Phase 1b/2 trial of tepotinib in sorafenib pretreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with MET overexpression

A phase Ib/II trial of capmatinib plus spartalizumab vs. spartalizumab alone in patients with pretreated hepatocellular carcinoma

Background & aims

This phase Ib/II trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of capmatinib in combination with spartalizumab or spartalizumab alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Eligible patients who had progressed or were intolerant to sorafenib received escalating doses of capmatinib 200 mg, 300 mg, and 400 mg twice a day (bid) plus spartalizumab 300 mg every 3 weeks (q3w) in the phase Ib study. Once the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was determined, the phase II study commenced with randomised 1:1 treatment with either capmatinib + spartalizumab (n = 32) or spartalizumab alone (n = 30). Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability (phase Ib) and investigator-assessed overall response rate per RECIST v1.1 for combination vs. single-agent arms using a Bayesian logistic regression model (phase II).

Results

In phase Ib, the RP2D for capmatinib in combination with spartalizumab was determined to be 400 mg bid. Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of grade 3 diarrhoea was reported in one patient at the capmatinib 400 mg bid + spartalizumab 300 mg q3w dose level. The primary endpoint in the phase II study was not met. The observed overall response rate in the capmatinib + spartalizumab arm was 9.4% vs. 10% in the spartalizumab arm. The most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs, ≥20%) were nausea (37.5%), asthenia and vomiting (28.1% each), diarrhoea, pyrexia, and decreased appetite (25.0% each) in the combination arm; TRAEs ≥10% were pruritus (23.3%), and rash (10.0%) in the spartalizumab-alone arm.

Conclusion

Capmatinib at 400 mg bid plus spartalizumab 300 mg q3w was established as the RP2D, with manageable toxicities and no significant safety signals, but the combination did not show superior clinical activity compared with spartalizumab single-agent treatment in patients with advanced HCC who had previously been treated with sorafenib.

Impact and implications

Simultaneous targeting of MET and programmed cell death protein 1 may provide synergistic clinical benefit in patients with advanced HCC. This is the first trial to report a combination of capmatinib (MET inhibitor) and spartalizumab (programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor) as second-line treatment after sorafenib for advanced HCC. The combination did not show superior clinical activity compared with spartalizumab single-agent treatment in patients with advanced HCC who had previously been treated with sorafenib. The results indicate that there is a clear need to identify a reliable predictive marker of response for HCC and to identify patients with HCC that would benefit from the combination of checkpoint inhibitor +/- targeted therapy.

Clinical trial number

NCT02795429.

Activity of Tepotinib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma With High-Level MET Amplification: Preclinical and Clinical Evidence

PURPOSE

MET amplification (METamp) has been reported in 1%-5% of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and may be sensitive to MET inhibition. Tepotinib, a selective MET inhibitor, has shown promising activity in HCC with MET overexpression. We investigated the preclinical and clinical activity of tepotinib in HCC with METamp (MET gene copy number [GCN] ≥5), including high-level METamp (MET GCN ≥10).

METHODS

Preclinical antitumor activity of tepotinib 100 mg/kg (orally, days 1-5, every 7 days, 3-5 weeks; 3-12 replicates) was evaluated according to METamp status, as determined using the nCounter platform (NanoString), in 37 HCC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) in immunodeficient mice. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in patients with METamp by fluorescence in situ hybridization who received tepotinib 500 mg (450 mg active moiety) in two phase Ib/II trials in HCC with MET overexpression.

RESULTS

Across the PDX models, tepotinib induced complete or near-complete tumor regression in the only two models with high-level METamp. Median tumor volume reductions were 100% and 99.8% in models with MET GCN 47.1 and 44.0, respectively. Across the two clinical trials, 15/121 patients had METamp. Disease control was achieved by 11/15 patients with METamp (complete response [CR], n = 1; partial response [PR], n = 4; stable disease [SD], n = 6) and 4/4 with high-level METamp (CR, n = 1; PR, n = 2; SD, n = 1). All three patients with high-level METamp and objective response received treatment for >1 year, including one patient who received first-line tepotinib for >6 years.

CONCLUSION

High-level METamp may be an oncogenic driver in HCC that is sensitive to MET inhibitors such as tepotinib.

Radiomics Based on Contrast-Enhanced CT for Recognizing c-Met-Positive Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Noninvasive Approach to Predict the Outcome of Sorafenib Resistance

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of our project was to investigate the effectiveness of radiomic features based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) that can detect the expression of c-Met in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to validate its efficacy in predicting the outcome of sorafenib resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 130 patients (median age, 60 years) with pathologically confirmed HCC who underwent contrast material-enhanced CT from October 2012 to July 2020 were randomly divided into a training set (n = 91) and a test set (n = 39). Radiomic features were extracted from arterial phase (AP), portal venous phase (VP) and delayed phase (DP) images of every participant's enhanced CT images.

RESULTS

The entire group comprised 39 Met-positive and 91 Met-negative patients. The combined model, which included the clinical factors and the radiomic features, performed well in the training (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.878) and validation (AUC = 0.851) cohorts. The nomogram, which relied on the combined model, fits well in the calibration curves. Decision curve analysis (DCA) further confirmed that the clinical valuation of the nomogram achieved comparable accuracy in c-Met prediction. Among another 20 patients with HCC who had received sorafenib, the predicted high-risk group had shorter overall survival (OS) than the predicted low-risk group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A multivariate model acquired from three phases (AP, VP and DP) of enhanced CT, HBV-DNA and γ glutamyl transpeptidase isoenzyme II (GGT-II) could be considered a satisfactory preoperative marker of the expression of c-Met in patients with HCC. This approach may help in overcoming sorafenib resistance in advanced HCC.

MET in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Cross 'a Long and Winding Road' Looking for a Target

Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) can harbour different MET alterations, such as MET overexpression (MET OE), MET gene amplification (MET AMP), or MET gene mutations. Retrospective studies of surgical series of patients with MET-dysregulated NSCLC have shown worse clinical outcomes irrespective of the type of specific MET gene alteration. On the other hand, earlier attempts failed to identify the 'druggable' molecular gene driver until the discovery of MET exon 14 skipping mutations (METex14). METex14 are rare and amount to around 3% of all NSCLCs. Patients with METex14 NSCLC attain modest results when they are treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). New selective MET inhibitors (MET-Is) showed a long-lasting clinical benefit in patients with METex14 NSCLC and modest activity in patients with MET AMP NSCLC. Ongoing clinical trials are investigating new small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, or antibodies drug conjugate (ADCs). This review focuses on the prognostic role of MET, the summary of pivotal clinical trials of selective MET-Is with a focus on resistance mechanisms. The last section is addressed to future developments and challenges.

An Observatory for the MET Oncogene: A Guide for Targeted Therapies

The MET proto-oncogene encodes a pivotal tyrosine kinase receptor, binding the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF, also known as scatter factor, SF) and governing essential biological processes such as organogenesis, tissue repair, and angiogenesis. The pleiotropic physiological functions of MET explain its diverse role in cancer progression in a broad range of tumors; genetic/epigenetic alterations of MET drive tumor cell dissemination, metastasis, and acquired resistance to conventional and targeted therapies. Therefore, targeting MET emerged as a promising strategy, and many efforts were devoted to identifying the optimal way of hampering MET signaling. Despite encouraging results, however, the complexity of MET's functions in oncogenesis yields intriguing observations, fostering a humbler stance on our comprehension. This review explores recent discoveries concerning MET alterations in cancer, elucidating their biological repercussions, discussing therapeutic avenues, and outlining future directions. By contextualizing the research question and articulating the study's purpose, this work navigates MET biology's intricacies in cancer, offering a comprehensive perspective.

The Preclinical Pharmacology of Tepotinib-A Highly Selective MET Inhibitor with Activity in Tumors Harboring MET Alterations

The mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) proto-oncogene encodes the MET receptor tyrosine kinase. MET aberrations drive tumorigenesis in several cancer types through a variety of molecular mechanisms, including MET mutations, gene amplification, rearrangement, and overexpression. Therefore, MET is a therapeutic target and the selective type Ib MET inhibitor, tepotinib, was designed to potently inhibit MET kinase activity. In vitro, tepotinib inhibits MET in a concentration-dependent manner irrespective of the mode of MET activation, and in vivo, tepotinib exhibits marked, dose-dependent antitumor activity in MET-dependent tumor models of various cancer indications. Tepotinib penetrates the blood-brain barrier and demonstrates strong antitumor activity in subcutaneous and orthotopic brain metastasis models, in-line with clinical activity observed in patients. MET amplification is an established mechanism of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), and preclinical studies show that tepotinib in combination with EGFR TKIs can overcome this resistance. Tepotinib is currently approved for the treatment of adult patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations. This review focuses on the pharmacology of tepotinib in preclinical cancer models harboring MET alterations and demonstrates that strong adherence to the principles of the Pharmacological Audit Trail may result in a successful discovery and development of a precision medicine.

Biomarker discovery and application-An opportunity to resolve the challenge of liver cancer diagnosis and treatment

Liver cancer is one of the most common malignancies, with severe morbidity and mortality. While considerable progress has been made in liver cancer treatment, the 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients has not improved significantly. Reasons include the inadequate capability of early screening and diagnosis, a high incidence of recurrence and metastasis, a high degree of tumor heterogeneity, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Therefore, the identification and validation of specific and robust liver cancer biomarkers are of major importance for early screening, timely diagnosis, accurate prognosis, and the prevention of tumor progression. In this review, we highlight some of the latest research progress and potential applications of liver cancer biomarkers, describing hotspots and prospective directions in biomarker discovery.

Targeting the cMET pathway to enhance immunotherapeutic approaches for mUM patients

The liver is the most preferential initial site of metastasis for uveal melanoma (mUM), and this preference is associated with rapid mortality in mUM patients. Despite the significant clinical benefits of Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in metastatic cutaneous melanoma patients, ICIs have shown little to no benefit in mUM patients. A potential reason for this inefficiency of ICI could be partly devoted to the involvement of the liver itself, thanks to its rich source of growth factors and immunosuppressive microenvironment. Uveal melanoma cells show increased expression of a transmembrane protein called cMET, which is known as the sole receptor for the Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). Hyperactivation of cMET by HGF contributes to mUM development, and the liver, being the major source of HGF, may partially explain the metastasis of uveal melanoma cells to the liver. In addition, cMET/HGF signaling has also been shown to mediate resistance to ICI treatment, directly and indirectly, involving tumor and immune cell populations. Therefore, targeting the cMET/HGF interaction may enhance the efficacy of immunotherapeutic regimes for mUM patients. Hence in this minireview, we will discuss the rationale for combining cMET inhibitors/antibodies with leading immune checkpoint inhibitors for treating mUM. We will also briefly highlight the challenges and opportunities in targeting cMET in mUM.

Targeted Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment: A New Era Ahead-A Systematic Review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains one of the most common malignancies and the third cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with surgery being the best prognostic tool. Among the well-known causative factors of HCC are chronic liver virus infections, chronic virus hepatitis B (HBV) and chronic hepatitis virus C (HCV), aflatoxins, tobacco consumption, and non-alcoholic liver disease (NAFLD). There is a need for the development of efficient molecular markers and alternative therapeutic targets of great significance. In this review, we describe the general characteristics of HCC and present a variety of targeted therapies that resulted in progress in HCC therapy.

Small molecule inhibitors targeting the cancers

Compared with traditional therapies, targeted therapy has merits in selectivity, efficacy, and tolerability. Small molecule inhibitors are one of the primary targeted therapies for cancer. Due to their advantages in a wide range of targets, convenient medication, and the ability to penetrate into the central nervous system, many efforts have been devoted to developing more small molecule inhibitors. To date, 88 small molecule inhibitors have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration to treat cancers. Despite remarkable progress, small molecule inhibitors in cancer treatment still face many obstacles, such as low response rate, short duration of response, toxicity, biomarkers, and resistance. To better promote the development of small molecule inhibitors targeting cancers, we comprehensively reviewed small molecule inhibitors involved in all the approved agents and pivotal drug candidates in clinical trials arranged by the signaling pathways and the classification of small molecule inhibitors. We discussed lessons learned from the development of these agents, the proper strategies to overcome resistance arising from different mechanisms, and combination therapies concerned with small molecule inhibitors. Through our review, we hoped to provide insights and perspectives for the research and development of small molecule inhibitors in cancer treatment.

Identification of an Oxidative Stress-Related LncRNA Signature for Predicting Prognosis and Chemotherapy in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: Oxidative stress plays a critical role in oncogenesis and tumor progression. However, the prognostic role of oxidative stress-related lncRNA in hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) has not been fully explored.

Methods: We used the gene expression data and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database to identify oxidative stress-related differentially expressed lncRNAs (DElncRNAs) by pearson correlation analysis. A four-oxidative stress-related DElncRNA signature was constructed by LASSO regression and Cox regression analyses. The predictive signature was further validated by Kaplan–Meier (K–M) survival analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, nomogram and calibration plots, and principal component analysis (PCA). Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was used to explore the relationship between the signature and immune status. Finally, the correlation between the signature and chemotherapeutic response of HCC patients was analyzed.

Results: In our study, the four-DElncRNA signature was not only proved to be a robust independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) prediction, but also played a crucial role in the regulation of progression and chemotherapeutic response of HCC. ssGSEA showed that the signature was correlated with the infiltration level of immune cells. HCC patients in high-risk group were more sensitive to the conventional chemotherapeutic drugs including Sorafenib, lapatinib, Nilotinib, Gefitinib, Erlotinib and Dasatinib, which pave the way for targeting DElncRNA-associated treatments for HCC patients.

Conclusion: Our study has originated a prognostic signature for HCC based on oxidative stress-related DElncRNAs, deepened the understanding of the biological role of four key DElncRNAs in HCC and laid a theoretical foundation for the choice of chemotherapy.

Advances in Pharmacotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A State-of-the-Art Review

BACKGROUND

Due to the number of emerging new treatment options, the systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rapidly changing. We provide here an overview of the current landscape of systemic treatment of HCC and discuss its potential future development.

SUMMARY

HCC is a leading cause of tumor-related death worldwide. Despite the efforts aimed at reducing the prevalence of HCC through vaccination and antiviral treatment, and the implementation of screening programs for early tumor detection, most patients are diagnosed with or progress to advanced HCC. For approximately 10 years, sorafenib has been the only effective systemic treatment available for these patients. Recently, however, a number of new systemic compounds, comprising several multi-kinase inhibitors and immune-checkpoint inhibitors, have been approved for treatment of HCC. These new agents are opening a plethora of therapeutic options for the future therapy of HCC.

KEY MESSAGES

The rapid progress in the treatment of HCC raises the question of the optimal combination and sequence of these agents in the treatment of patients with advanced disease. The substantial improvements in terms of objective response and survival indicate that the use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors-based treatment combinations may be extended to patients with intermediate-stage HCC.

Advances in novel systemic therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents the most frequent type of primary liver tumor. Most HCC patients present with advanced disease at diagnosis and the recurrence rate after surgery remains high. Treatment options for advanced HCC are limited, with sorafenib representing the only systemic agent approved for treatment of advanced HCC in more than a decade. However, in recent years new molecular targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced HCC. In particular, combinations of ICIs with antiangiogenic drugs, or with other ICIs, represent one of the most promising strategies. Herein we provide a comprehensive overview of the main therapeutic advances in the systemic treatment of HCC, focusing on the most relevant ongoing clinical trials.

Opportunities and challenges of targeting c-Met in the treatment of digestive tumors

At present, a large number of studies have demonstrated that c-Met generally exerts a crucial function of promoting tumor cells proliferation and differentiation in digestive system tumors. c-Met also mediates tumor progression and drug resistance by signaling interactions with other oncogenic molecules and then activating downstream pathways. Therefore, c-Met is a promising target for the treatment of digestive system tumors. Many anti-tumor therapies targeting c-Met (tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and adoptive immunotherapy) have been developed in treating digestive system tumors. Some drugs have been successfully applied to clinic, but most of them are defective due to their efficacy and complications. In order to promote the clinical application of targeting c-Met drugs in digestive system tumors, it is necessary to further explore the mechanism of c-Met action in digestive system tumors and optimize the anti-tumor treatment of targeting c-Met drugs. Through reading a large number of literatures, the author systematically reviewed the biological functions and molecular mechanisms of c-Met associated with tumor and summarized the current status of targeting c-Met in the treatment of digestive system tumors so as to provide new ideas for the treatment of digestive system tumors.

Exposure-response analyses for the MET inhibitor tepotinib including patients in the pivotal VISION trial: support for dosage recommendations

Purpose

Tepotinib is a highly selective MET inhibitor approved for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring METex14 skipping alterations. Analyses presented herein evaluated the relationship between tepotinib exposure, and efficacy and safety outcomes.

Methods

Exposure–efficacy analyses included data from an ongoing phase 2 study (VISION) investigating 500 mg/day tepotinib in NSCLC harboring METex14 skipping alterations. Efficacy endpoints included objective response, duration of response, and progression-free survival. Exposure–safety analyses included data from VISION, plus four completed studies in advanced solid tumors/hepatocellular carcinoma (30–1400 mg). Safety endpoints included edema, serum albumin, creatinine, amylase, lipase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and QT interval corrected using Fridericia’s method (QTcF).

Results

Tepotinib exhibited flat exposure–efficacy relationships for all endpoints within the exposure range observed with 500 mg/day. Tepotinib also exhibited flat exposure–safety relationships for all endpoints within the exposure range observed with 30–1400 mg doses. Edema is the most frequently reported adverse event and the most frequent cause of tepotinib dose reductions and interruptions; however, the effect plateaued at low exposures. Concentration-QTc analyses using data from 30 to 1400 mg tepotinib resulted in the upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval being less than 10 ms for the mean exposures at the therapeutic (500 mg) and supratherapeutic (1000 mg) doses.

Conclusions

These analyses provide important quantitative pharmacologic support for benefit/risk assessment of the 500 mg/day dosage of tepotinib as being appropriate for the treatment of NSCLC harboring METex14 skipping alterations.

Registration Numbers

NCT01014936, NCT01832506, NCT01988493, NCT02115373, NCT02864992.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00280-022-04441-3.

Experimental drug treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma: Clinical trial failures 2015 to 2021

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major health problem worldwide with limited systemic therapy options. Since the approval of sorafenib in 2008, no systemic therapy has provided a sustained/robust/survival benefit for patients with advanced HCC until recently. Many initially promising therapies have been trialed, but survival outcomes remained stagnant. As such, knowledge concerning previous treatment failures may help guide further areas of study, as well inform future therapeutic approaches.

AREA COVERED

This article reviews recent advances in the treatment of HCC. Despite some recent success, many systemic and locoregional therapies have failed to produce significant improvements in outcome. These treatment failures are examined and insight into pathways for future success are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Combination atezolizumab and bevacizumab has changed the landscape of systemic treatment for patients with HCC when it became the first therapy after demonstrating improve outcomes over sorafenib. Clinical trials in patients with advanced HCC have inherent difficulty with challenges to determine if a patient's declining liver function is secondary to disease progression, worsening cirrhosis, or drug toxicity, which may skew results. As we gain more knowledge of underlying genetic alterations behind the pathophysiology of the development of HCC, molecular markers may be identified to assist in predicting which patients would respond to a specific therapy.

Companion Diagnostics and Predictive Biomarkers for MET-Targeted Therapy in NSCLC

Simple Summary

MET is a receptor tyrosine kinase encoded by the MET proto-oncogene that has a significant role in cancer cell progression. Several drugs targeting MET are under development for the treatment of different cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, until now, relatively few of these drugs have shown sufficient clinical activity and obtained regulatory approval. One of the reasons for this could be the lack of effective biomarkers to select the right patients for treatment. In a number of clinical trials, different biomarkers have been studied, but so far, MET exon 14 skipping mutation is the only one that has shown sufficient predictive properties. Another interesting biomarker is MET amplification detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which has shown promising results in the treatment of patients with NSCLC. Future clinical research will show whether MET amplification by FISH is an effective predictive biomarker for MET-targeted therapy.

Abstract

Dysregulation of the MET tyrosine kinase receptor is a known oncogenic driver, and multiple genetic alterations can lead to a clinically relevant oncogenesis. Currently, a number of drugs targeting MET are under development as potential therapeutics for different cancer indications, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, relatively few of these drugs have shown sufficient clinical activity and obtained regulatory approval. One of the reasons for this could be the lack of effective predictive biomarkers to select the right patient populations for treatment. So far, capmatinib is the only MET-targeted drug approved with a companion diagnostic (CDx) assay, which is indicated for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC in patients having a mutation resulting in MET exon 14 skipping. An alternative predictive biomarker for MET therapy is MET amplification, which has been identified as a resistance mechanism in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Results obtained from different clinical trials seem to indicate that the MET/CEP7 ratio detected by FISH possesses the best predictive properties, likely because this method excludes MET amplification caused by polysomy. In this article, the concept of CDx assays will be discussed, with a focus on the currently FDA-approved MET targeted therapies for the treatment of NSCLC.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tepotinib, an oral MET kinase inhibitor, including data from the VISION study

Purpose

Tepotinib is a highly selective, potent, mesenchymal–epithelial transition factor (MET) inhibitor, approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring MET exon 14 skipping. Objectives of this population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis were to evaluate the dose–exposure relationship of tepotinib and its major circulating metabolite, MSC2571109A, and to identify the intrinsic/extrinsic factors that are predictive of PK variability.

Methods

Data were included from 12 studies in patients with cancer and in healthy participants. A sequential modeling approach was used to analyze the parent and metabolite data, including covariate analyses. Potential associations between observed covariates and PK parameters were illustrated using bootstrap analysis-based forest plots.

Results

A two-compartment model with sequential zero- and first-order absorption, and a first-order elimination from the central compartment, best described the plasma PK of tepotinib in humans across the dose range of 30–1400 mg. The bioavailability of tepotinib was shown to be dose dependent, although bioavailability decreased primarily at doses above the therapeutic dose of 500 mg. The intrinsic factors of race, age, sex, body weight, mild/moderate hepatic impairment and mild/moderate renal impairment, along with the extrinsic factors of opioid analgesic and gefitinib intake, had no relevant effect on tepotinib PK. Tepotinib has a long effective half-life of ~ 32 h.

Conclusions

Tepotinib shows dose proportionality up to at least the therapeutic dose, and time-independent clearance with a profile appropriate for once-daily dosing. None of the covariates identified had a clinically meaningful effect on tepotinib exposure or required dose adjustments.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00280-022-04423-5.

Safety of Tepotinib in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC and Recommendations for Management

INTRODUCTION

The MET inhibitor tepotinib demonstrated durable clinical activity in patients with advanced MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping NSCLC. We report detailed analyses of adverse events of clinical interest (AECIs) in VISION, including edema, a class effect of MET inhibitors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Incidence, management, and time to first onset/resolution were analyzed for all-cause AECIs, according to composite categories (edema, hypoalbuminemia, creatinine increase, and ALT/AST increase) or individual preferred terms (pleural effusion, nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting), for patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC in the phase II VISION trial.

RESULTS

Of 255 patients analyzed (median age: 72 years), edema, the most common AECI, was reported in 69.8% (grade 3, 9.4%; grade 4, 0%). Median time to first edema onset was 7.9 weeks (range: 0.1-58.3). Edema was manageable with supportive measures, dose reduction (18.8%), and/or treatment interruption (23.1%), and rarely prompted discontinuation (4.3%). Other AECIs were also manageable and predominantly mild/moderate: hypoalbuminemia, 23.9% (grade 3, 5.5%); pleural effusion, 13.3% (grade ≥ 3, 5.1%); creatinine increase, 25.9% (grade 3, 0.4%); nausea, 26.7% (grade 3, 0.8%), diarrhea, 26.3% (grade 3, 0.4%), vomiting 12.9% (grade 3, 1.2%), and ALT/AST increase, 12.2% (grade ≥ 3, 3.1%). GI AEs typically occurred early and resolved in the first weeks.

CONCLUSION

Tepotinib was well tolerated in the largest trial of a MET inhibitor in METex14 skipping NSCLC. The most frequent AEs were largely mild/moderate and manageable with supportive measures and/or dose reduction/interruption, and caused few withdrawals in this elderly population.

Recent advances in systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and lethal malignant tumors in the world. Therapeutic options for advanced HCC are limited. Systemic treatment, especially with conventional cytotoxic drugs, is usually ineffective. For more than a decade, sorafenib has been the only systemic drug that has been proven to be clinically effective for treating advanced HCC. However, over the past three years, the rapid progress of molecular targeted therapies has dramatically changed the treatment landscape for advanced HCC. Immune checkpoint therapies are now being incorporated into HCC therapies, and their combination with molecular targeted therapy is emerging as a tool to enhance the immune response. In this review, we summarize the development and progress of molecular targeted agents and immunotherapies in HCC.

Advances of Targeted Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the common and fatal malignancies, which is a significant global health problem. The clinical applicability of traditional surgery and other locoregional therapies is limited, and these therapeutic strategies are far from satisfactory in improving the outcomes of advanced HCC. In the past decade, targeted therapy had made a ground-breaking progress in advanced HCC. Those targeted therapies exert antitumor effects through specific signals, including anti-angiogenesis or cell cycle progression. As a standard systemic therapy option, it tremendously improves the survival of this devastating disease. Moreover, the combination of targeted therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) has demonstrated more potent anticancer effects and becomes the hot topic in clinical studies. The combining medications bring about a paradigm shift in the treatment of advanced HCC. In this review, we presented all approved targeted agents for advanced HCC with an emphasis on their clinical efficacy, summarized the advances of multi-target drugs in research for HCC and potential therapeutic targets for drug development. We also discussed the exciting results of the combination between targeted therapy and ICI.

Randomised Phase 1b/2 trial of tepotinib vs sorafenib in Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with MET overexpression

Background

This open-label, Phase 1b/2 study evaluated the highly selective MET inhibitor tepotinib in systemic anticancer treatment (SACT)-naive Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) with MET overexpression.

Methods

In Phase 2b, tepotinib was orally administered once daily (300, 500 or 1,000 mg) to Asian adults with aHCC. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs). Phase 2 randomised SACT-naive Asian adults with aHCC with MET overexpression to tepotinib (recommended Phase 2 dose [RP2D]) or sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was independently assessed time to progression (TTP).

Results

In Phase 1b (n = 27), no DLTs occurred; the RP2D was 500 mg. In Phase 2 (n = 90, 45 patients per arm), the primary endpoint was met: independently assessed TTP was significantly longer with tepotinib versus sorafenib (median 2.9 versus 1.4 months, HR = 0.42, 90% confidence interval: 0.26–0.70, P = 0.0043). Progression-free survival and objective response also favoured tepotinib. Treatment-related Grade ≥3 AE rates were 28.9% with tepotinib and 45.5% with sorafenib.

Conclusions

Tepotinib improved TTP versus sorafenib and was generally well tolerated in SACT-naive Asian patients with aHCC with MET overexpression.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01988493.