Characterizing the mutational burden, DNA methylation landscape, and proteome of germ cell tumor-related somatic-type malignancies to identify the tissue-of-origin, mechanisms of therapy resistance, and druggable targets

Molecular and epigenetic ex vivo profiling of testis cancer-associated fibroblasts and their interaction with germ cell tumor cells and macrophages

Germ cell tumors (GCT) are the most common solid tumors in young men of age 15 - 40. In previous studies, we profiled the interaction of GCT cells with cells of the tumor microenvironment (TM), which showed that especially the 3D interaction of fibroblasts (FB) or macrophages with GCT cells influenced the growth behavior and cisplatin response as well as the transcriptome and secretome of the tumor cells, suggesting that the crosstalk of these cells with GCT cells is crucial for tumor progression and therapy outcome. In this study, we shed light on the mechanisms of activation of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) in the GCT setting and their effects on GCT cells lines and the monocyte cell line THP-1. Ex vivo cultures of GCT-derived CAF were established and characterized molecularly and epigenetically by performing DNA methylation arrays, RNA sequencing, and mass spectrometry-based secretome analysis. We demonstrated that the activation state of CAF is influenced by their former prevailing tumor environment in which they have resided. Hereby, we postulate that seminoma (SE) and embryonal carcinoma (EC) activate CAF, while teratoma (TER) play only a minor role in CAF formation. In turn, CAF influence proliferation and the expression of cisplatin sensitivity-related factors in GCT cells lines as well as polarization of in vitro-induced macrophages by the identified effector molecules IGFBP1, LGALS3BP, LYVE1, and PTX3. Our data suggests that the vital interaction of CAF with GCT cells and with macrophages has a huge influence on shaping the extracellular matrix as well as on recruitment of immune cells to the TM. In conclusion, therapeutically interfering with CAF and / or macrophages in addition to the standard therapy might slow-down progression of GCT and re-shaping of the TM to a tumor-promoting environment. Significance: The interaction of CAF with GCT and macrophages considerably influences the microenvironment. Thus, therapeutically interfering with CAF might slow-down progression of GCT and re-shaping of the microenvironment to a tumor-promoting environment.

Pathogenesis and pathobiology of testicular germ cell tumours: a view from a developmental biological perspective with guidelines for pathological diagnostics

Testicular germ cell tumours (GCT) are divided into three different subtypes (types I-III) regarding to their developmental origin, histological differences and molecular features. Type I GCT develop from disturbed primordial germ cells and most commonly occur in children and young adolescents, which is why they are referred to as prepubertal GCT. Type II GCT develop from a non-invasive germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) and show an isochromosome 12p (i12p) or gain of 12p material as a common and characteristic molecular alteration. Type III GCT originate from distorted postpubertal germ cells (e.g. spermatogonia) in adult patients and have changes on chromosome 9 with amplification of the DMRT1 gene. Type I GCT encompass prepubertal-type teratomas and yolk-sac tumours (YST). Type II GCT include seminoma, embryonal carcinoma, choriocarcinoma, postpubertal-type teratoma and postpubertal-type YST. Types I and II GCT both show similar morphology, but are separated from each other by the detection of a GCNIS and an i12p in type II GCT. For type II GCT it is especially important to detect non-seminomatous elements, as these tumours have a worse biological behaviour and need a different treatment to seminomas. In contrast to types I and II GCT, type III tumours are equivalent to spermatocytic tumours and usually occur in elderly men, with few exceptions in young adults. The development of types I and II GCT seems to depend not upon driver mutations, but rather on changes in the epigenetic landscape. Furthermore, different pluripotency associated factors (e.g. OCT3/4, SOX2, SOX17) play a crucial role in GCT development and can be used as immunohistochemical markers allowing to distinguish the different subtypes from each other in morphologically challenging tissue specimens. Especially in metastatic sites, a morphological and immunohistochemical diagnostic algorithm is important to detect small subpopulations of each non-seminomatous GCT subtype, which are associated with a poorer prognosis and need a different treatment. Furthermore, primary extragonadal GCT of the retroperitoneum or mediastinum develop from misguided germ cells during embryonic development, and might be challenging to detect in small tissue biopsies due to their rarity at corresponding sites. This review article summarises the pathobiological and developmental aspects of the three different types of testicular GCT that can be helpful in the histopathological examination of tumour specimens by pathologists.

Fibroblast Growth Factor 6

Fibroblast Growth Factor 6 (FGF6), also referred to as HST2 or HBGF6, is a member of the Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), the Heparin Binding Growth Factor (HBGF) and the Heparin Binding Secretory Transforming Gene (HST) families. The genomic and protein structure of FGF6 is highly conserved among varied species, as is its expression in muscle and muscle progenitor cells. Like other members of the FGF family, FGF6 regulates cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration. Specifically, it plays key roles in myogenesis and muscular regeneration, angiogenesis, along with iron transport and lipid metabolism. Similar to others from the FGF family, FGF6 also possesses oncogenic transforming activity, and as such is implicated in a variety of cancers.

Analysis of GATA3 and FOXA2 expression suggests that downregulation of genes involved in the maintenance of a mature yolk sac tumor phenotype may underlie sarcomatoid transformation

In the post-chemotherapy setting, germ cell tumors of the testis (GCTT) that resemble non-specific sarcomas and co-express cytokeratins and glypican-3 (GPC3) are diagnosed as "sarcomatoid yolk sac tumor postpubertal-type (YSTpt)". The diagnosis of sarcomatoid YSTpt is clinically relevant but challenging due to its rarity, non-specific histology, and negative α-fetoprotein (AFP) staining. Recently, FOXA2 has emerged as a key-gene in the reprogramming of GCTT (activating the transcription of several genes, among which GATA3), and immunohistochemical studies showed that GATA3 and FOXA2 have a higher sensitivity for non-sarcomatoid YSTpt than GPC3 and AFP. We found that sarcomatoid YSTpt did not express FOXA2 [0: 14/14 (100%)] and showed focal expression of GATA3 [0: 12/14 (85.7%), 1 + : 2/14 (14.3%)], thus suggesting that these markers are not useful in diagnosing this tumor. Furthermore, we proposed a potential mechanism of sarcomatoid transformation in the post-chemotherapy setting of GCTT, mediated by the downregulation of FOXA2 and GATA3.

Assessing the risk to develop a growing teratoma syndrome based on molecular and epigenetic subtyping as well as novel secreted biomarkers

In germ cell tumors (GCT), a growing teratoma during chemotherapy with decreasing tumor markers was defined as 'growing teratoma syndrome' (GTS) by Logothetis et al. in 1982. So far, its pathogenesis and specific treatment options remain elusive. We aimed at updating the GTS definition based on molecular and epigenetic features as well as identifying circulating biomarkers. We selected 50 GTS patients for clinical characterization and subsequently 12 samples were molecularly analyzed. We further included 7 longitudinal samples of 2 GTS patients. Teratomas (TER) showing no features of GTS served as controls. GTS were stratified based on growth rates into a slow (<0.5 cm/month), medium (0.5-1.5) and rapid (>1.5) group. By analyzing DNA methylation, microRNA expression and the secretome, we identified putative epigenetic and secreted biomarkers for the GTS subgroups. We found that proteins enriched in the GTS groups compared to TER were involved in proliferation, DNA replication and the cell cycle, while proteins interacting with the immune system were depleted. Additionally, GTSrapid seem to interact more strongly with the surrounding microenvironment than GTSslow. Expression of pluripotency- and yolk-sac tumor-associated genes in GTS and formation of a yolk-sac tumor or somatic-type malignancy in the longitudinal GTS samples, pointed at an additional occult non-seminomatous component after chemotherapy. Thus, updating the Logothetis GTS definition is necessary, which we propose as follows: The GTS describes a continuously growing teratoma that might harbor occult non-seminomatous components considerably reduced during therapy but outgrowing over time again.

Role of Epigenetics for the Efficacy of Cisplatin

The clinical utility of the chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin is restricted by cancer drug resistance, which is either intrinsic to the tumor or acquired during therapy. Epigenetics is increasingly recognized as a factor contributing to cisplatin resistance and hence influences drug efficacy and clinical outcomes. In particular, epigenetics regulates gene expression without changing the DNA sequence. Common types of epigenetic modifications linked to chemoresistance are DNA methylation, histone modification, and non-coding RNAs. This review provides an overview of the current findings of various epigenetic modifications related to cisplatin efficacy in cell lines in vitro and in clinical tumor samples. Furthermore, it discusses whether epigenetic alterations might be used as predictors of the platinum agent response in order to prevent avoidable side effects in patients with resistant malignancies. In addition, epigenetic targeting therapies are described as a possible strategy to render cancer cells more susceptible to platinum drugs.