Gasdermin D promotes hyperinflammation and immunopathology during severe influenza A virus infection

Host Innate Antiviral Response to Influenza A Virus Infection: From Viral Sensing to Antagonism and Escape

Influenza virus possesses an RNA genome of single-stranded, negative-sensed, and segmented configuration. Influenza virus causes an acute respiratory disease, commonly known as the "flu" in humans. In some individuals, flu can lead to pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Influenza A virus (IAV) is the most significant because it causes recurring seasonal epidemics, occasional pandemics, and zoonotic outbreaks in human populations, globally. The host innate immune response to IAV infection plays a critical role in sensing, preventing, and clearing the infection as well as in flu disease pathology. Host cells sense IAV infection through multiple receptors and mechanisms, which culminate in the induction of a concerted innate antiviral response and the creation of an antiviral state, which inhibits and clears the infection from host cells. However, IAV antagonizes and escapes many steps of the innate antiviral response by different mechanisms. Herein, we review those host and viral mechanisms. This review covers most aspects of the host innate immune response, i.e., (1) the sensing of incoming virus particles, (2) the activation of downstream innate antiviral signaling pathways, (3) the expression of interferon-stimulated genes, (4) and viral antagonism and escape.

Need for standardization of Influenza A virus-induced cell death in vivo to improve consistency of inter-laboratory research findings

The involvement of necroptosis in the control of influenza A virus (IAV) infection has been reported in multiple studies. Downstream of the nucleic acid sensor ZBP1, RIPK3 kinase activity is critically involved in the induction of necroptotic cell death by phosphorylating MLKL, while RIPK3 as a scaffold can induce apoptosis. Paradoxically, RIPK3-deficiency of mice may result in increased or decreased susceptibility to IAV infection. Here, we critically review the published reports on the involvement of RIPK3 in IAV infection susceptibility and try to identify differences in experimental settings that could explain seemingly conflicting outcomes. Analysis of the experimental reports revealed differences in the IAV challenge dose, the IAV inoculum preparation, IAV titer assessment, as well as the route of inoculation between studies. Furthermore, differences were noticed in the inclusion of littermate controls, which show high variance in viral sensitivity. Our evaluation argues for a standardized setup for IAV infection experiments including the preparation of the IAV virus, the use of different IAV infectious doses description and the proper experimental genetic controls of the mouse strains to increase inter-laboratory consistency in this field. Workflow for IAV infection studies in vivo: Viral preparation and titer assessment should be as standardized as possible with the use of a universal repository (such as BEI resources). Infection studies in genetically modified mice and littermate controls should include dose-response experimentation, following a defined infection route and inoculation volume. Data are generated by consistent analysis methods.

The gasdermin family: emerging therapeutic targets in diseases

The gasdermin (GSDM) family has garnered significant attention for its pivotal role in immunity and disease as a key player in pyroptosis. This recently characterized class of pore-forming effector proteins is pivotal in orchestrating processes such as membrane permeabilization, pyroptosis, and the follow-up inflammatory response, which are crucial self-defense mechanisms against irritants and infections. GSDMs have been implicated in a range of diseases including, but not limited to, sepsis, viral infections, and cancer, either through involvement in pyroptosis or independently of this process. The regulation of GSDM-mediated pyroptosis is gaining recognition as a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of various diseases. Current strategies for inhibiting GSDMD primarily involve binding to GSDMD, blocking GSDMD cleavage or inhibiting GSDMD-N-terminal (NT) oligomerization, albeit with some off-target effects. In this review, we delve into the cutting-edge understanding of the interplay between GSDMs and pyroptosis, elucidate the activation mechanisms of GSDMs, explore their associations with a range of diseases, and discuss recent advancements and potential strategies for developing GSDMD inhibitors.

Gasdermin D promotes influenza virus-induced mortality through neutrophil amplification of inflammation

Influenza virus activates cellular inflammasome pathways, which can be both beneficial and detrimental to infection outcomes. Here, we investigate the function of the inflammasome-activated, pore-forming protein gasdermin D (GSDMD) during infection. Ablation of GSDMD in knockout (KO) mice (Gsdmd-/-) significantly attenuates influenza virus-induced weight loss, lung dysfunction, lung histopathology, and mortality compared with wild type (WT) mice, despite similar viral loads. Infected Gsdmd-/- mice exhibit decreased inflammatory gene signatures shown by lung transcriptomics. Among these, diminished neutrophil gene activation signatures are corroborated by decreased detection of neutrophil elastase and myeloperoxidase in KO mouse lungs. Indeed, directly infected neutrophils are observed in vivo and infection of neutrophils in vitro induces release of DNA and tissue-damaging enzymes that is largely dependent on GSDMD. Neutrophil depletion in infected WT mice recapitulates the reductions in mortality, lung inflammation, and lung dysfunction observed in Gsdmd-/- animals, while depletion does not have additive protective effects in Gsdmd-/- mice. These findings implicate a function for GSDMD in promoting lung neutrophil responses that amplify influenza virus-induced inflammation and pathogenesis. Targeting the GSDMD/neutrophil axis may provide a therapeutic avenue for treating severe influenza.

Prognostic, immunity, stemness, and anticancer drug sensitivity characterization of pyroptosis related genes in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Pyroptosis plays a pivotal role in the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) dynamics, particularly in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of our study was to explore its effects on tumor progression, TME patterns, and the efficacy of therapeutic interventions in NSCLC.

METHODS

Our investigation encompassed a thorough analysis of pyroptosis-related genes (PRGs), integrating immunohistochemistry (IHC) data, TME characteristics, stemness indices, and anticancer drug sensitivities. We aimed to analyze mRNA expression profiles across various cancers, constructing benchmark datasets to assess the clinical significance of PRGs in NSCLC. This included evaluating their association with clinical responses and efficacy. Notably, both our and HPA IHC data demonstrated significantly elevated GSDMD-N protein levels in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) tissues.

RESULTS

The expression of PRGs differed significantly between tumor and normal tissues across various cancers, as validated by IHC data, and was correlated with prognosis (p < 0.05). Moreover, our investigation revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) in the expression of the PRGs among distinct TME subtypes categorized as C1 (wound healing), C3 (inflammatory), C2 (IFN-gamma dominant), C5 (immunological quiet), C4 (lymphocyte deficient), and C6 (TGF-beta dominant). Additionally, our research on anticancer drug sensitivity uncovered compelling connections between specific anticancer medications and the expression of PRGs, including GSDMD, ELANE, IL18, and CHMP4A (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study provided valuable insights into the critical role of PRGs in TME modulation, tumor stemness, and anticancer drug sensitivity across diverse cancers. Our findings illuminate the intricate relationship between pyroptosis and the TME, offering new perspectives for enhancing NSCLC treatment and prognosis.