Comparative single-cell analysis reveals heterogeneous immune landscapes in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and gastric adenocarcinoma

The axis of tumor-associated macrophages, extracellular matrix proteins, and cancer-associated fibroblasts in oncogenesis

The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a complex, dynamic network of multiple macromolecules that serve as a crucial structural and physical scaffold for neighboring cells. In the tumor microenvironment (TME), ECM proteins play a significant role in mediating cellular communication between cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Revealing the ECM modification of the TME necessitates the intricate signaling cascades that transpire among diverse cell populations and ECM proteins. The advent of single-cell sequencing has enabled the identification and refinement of specific cellular subpopulations, which has substantially enhanced our comprehension of the intricate milieu and given us a high-resolution perspective on the diversity of ECM proteins. However, it is essential to integrate single-cell data and establish a coherent framework. In this regard, we present a comprehensive review of the relationships among ECM, TAMs, and CAFs. This encompasses insights into the ECM proteins released by TAMs and CAFs, signaling integration in the TAM-ECM-CAF axis, and the potential applications and limitations of targeted therapies for CAFs. This review serves as a reliable resource for focused therapeutic strategies while highlighting the crucial role of ECM proteins as intermediates in the TME.

m6A modification enhances the stability of CDC25A promotes tumorigenicity of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma via cell cycle

N6-Methyladenosine (m6A) modification and its regulators play critical roles in human cancers, but their functions and regulatory mechanisms in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) remain unclear. Here, we identified that IGF2BP3 is the most significantly up-regulated m6A regulator in AEG tumors versus paired normal adjacent tissues from the expression profile of m6A regulators in a large cohort of AEG patients. Silencing IGF2BP3 inhibits AEG progression in vitro and in vivo. By profiling transcriptome-wide targets of IGF2BP3 and the m6A methylome in AEG, we found that IGF2BP3-mediated stabilization and enhanced expression of m6A-modified targets, including targets of the cell cycle pathway, such as CDC25A, CDK4, and E2F1, are critical for AEG progression. Mechanistically, the increased m6A modification of CDC25A accelerates the G1-S transition. Clinically, up-regulated IGF2BP3, METTL3, and CDC25A show a strong positive correlation in TCGA pan-cancer, including AEG. In conclusion, our study highlights the role of post-transcriptional regulation in modulating AEG tumor progression and elucidates the functional importance of the m6A/IGF2BP3/CDC25A axis in AEG cells.

Molecular classification and intratumoral heterogeneity of gastric adenocarcinoma

Gastric cancers frequently harbor striking histological complexity and diversity between lesions as well as within single lesions, known as inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity, respectively. The latest World Health Organization Classification of Tumors designated more than 30 histological subtypes for gastric epithelial tumors, assigning 12 subtypes for gastric adenocarcinoma (GAD). Meanwhile, recent advances in genome-wide analyses have provided molecular aspects to the histological classification of GAD, and consequently revealed different molecular traits underlying these histological subtypes. Moreover, accumulating knowledge of comprehensive molecular profiles has led to establishing molecular classifications of GAD, which are often associated with clinical biomarkers for therapeutics and prognosis. However, most of our knowledge of GAD molecular profiles is based on inter-tumoral heterogeneity, and the molecular profiles underlying intratumoral heterogeneity are yet to be determined. In this review, recently established molecular classifications of GAD are introduced in the aspect of pathological diagnosis and are discussed in the context of intratumoral heterogeneity.

Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of Early and Advanced Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) persists as the fourth most prevalent cause of global cancer-related mortality, presenting a challenge due to the scarcity of available therapeutic strategies. Precision medicine is crucial not only in the treatment but also in the management of GC. We performed gene panel sequencing with Oncomine focus assay comprising 52 cancer-associated genes and MSI analysis in 100 case-matched gastric cancer cases. A comprehensive analysis of clinical and genetic characteristics was conducted on these genetic results and clinicopathological findings. Upon comparison of clinicopathological characteristics, significant differences between early gastric cancer (EGC) and advanced gastric cancer (AGC) were observed in tumor location (p = 0.003), Lauren classification (p = 0.015), T stage (p = 0.000), and N stage (p = 0.015). The six most frequently mutated genes were PIK3CA (29%, 10/35), ERBB2 (17%, 6/35), KRAS (14%, 5/35), ALK (6%, 2/35), ESR1 (6%, 2/35), and FGFR3 (6%, 2/35). Regarding genetic variation, there was a tendency for the N stage to be higher in GC patients with mutated genes (p = 0.014). The frequency of mutations in GC patients was statistically significantly higher in AGC (n = 24) compared to EGC (n = 11) (odds ratio, 2.792; 95% confidence interval, 1.113 to 7.007; p = 0.026). Six of the ten GC patients carrying mutated genes and exhibiting MSI were classified into intestinal-type and undifferentiated GC, with the location of the tumor being in the lower-third. Among these patients, five harbored mutated PIK3CA, while the remaining patient had a mutation in ALK. Conclusions: AGC patients more frequently exhibited alterations of PIK3CA, KRAS, and ERBB2 as somatic oncogenic drivers, and displayed a higher prevalence of cumulative genetic events, including increased rates of PIK3CA mutations, enhanced detection of immunotherapy biomarkers, and mutations of the ESR1 gene.