Patients' and professionals' preferences in terms of the attributes of home enteral nutrition products in Spain. A discrete choice experiment

Experience with the management of patients requiring home enteral nutrition in routine clinical practice in Spain: the ECONES study

Introduction

Introduction: enteral nutrition is an effective method for restoring the nutritional status in patients unable to eat or fulfil nutritional requirements orally. Objectives: the ECONES study aimed to describe the treatment of patients requiring home enteral nutrition (HEN) in routine practice and the experience of specialists with the high-protein hypercaloric formula 2.0 with fiber IS50 (HP/HC 2.0). Methods: Spanish specialists answered a 38-questions survey about their last six patients with HEN and their treatment with HP/HC 2.0 formula. Results: the formulas were chosen based on the patients' requirements. HP/HC 2.0 was administered in a mean of 31.5 % of patients, and for a mean of 42.2 % of those, it was selected since the beginning of treatment. According to 92.4 % of specialists, the HP/HC 2.0 was considered as adequate based on nutritional requirements. Among adverse reactions, specialists reported diarrhea, bloating and constipation. Specialists reported that caregivers (90.6 %) stated that HP/HC 2.0 was well tolerated by patients (90.6 %) and expressed comfort with the frequency (75.3 %) and administration time (82.9 %). Conclusions: according to the specialists, formulas are chosen based on patients' characteristics. Patients with high nutritional needs benefit from the HP/HC 2.0 formula as it allows volume restriction, presents few adverse events, and improves the quality of life of the patients.

Physicians' Perception of Oral Nutritional Supplement Acceptance and Tolerability in Malnourished Outpatients: PerceptiONS Study

Malnutrition is a common condition associated with various pathologies such as infections, neoplasms and digestive system disorders. Patients can be managed using different strategies, which include dietary modifications or oral nutritional supplements (ONS). It is important to promote good ONS adherence in order to attain clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Several factors (amount, type, duration and tolerability) may have an impact on ONS adherence. PerceptiONS is a descriptive, cross-sectional observational study based on an ad hoc electronic survey designed to explore physicians' perception of malnourished outpatients prescribed ONS. The survey considered adherence, acceptance/satisfaction, tolerability and benefits within the context of Spain's healthcare system. The perceptions of 548 physicians regarding the experience of 2516 patients were analyzed. From the physicians' perspective, 57.11% of patients adhered to over 75% of the prescribed ONS. The organoleptic properties of ONS represented the aspect with the most positive impact on adherence, with smell (43.72%) ranking as the top characteristic. In general, patients were satisfied (90.10%) with the ONS, with their related benefits (88.51%) and their organoleptic properties (90.42%), and accepted ONS in their daily diet (88.63%). ONS improved patients' general condition (87.04%), quality of life (QoL) (81.96%) and vitality/energy (81.28%). Physicians would prescribe the same ONS again in 96.4% of the cases.

Preferences of oral nutritional supplement therapy among postoperative patients with gastric cancer: Attributes development for a discrete choice experiment

Background

Adherence to oral nutritional supplement therapy among postoperative patients with gastric cancer is low. There is little knowledge about patients’ priorities and needs regarding oral nutritional supplement therapy. The discrete choice experiment is an innovative method used to elicit patients’ preferences. Good practice guidelines emphasize that the development of attributes and levels is a fundamentally important process.

Objective

To comprehensively describe the identification, refinement, and selection of attributes and levels for a discrete choice experiment.

Methods

A mixed-methods approach, consisting of three consecutive steps: a literature review, in-depth interviews, and focus groups. First, the literature review allowed quick identification of attributes and levels. Then, 15 in-depth interviews were conducted to gather a rich description of the experience of patients taking oral nutritional supplements after gastrectomy and to verify and enrich the attributes and levels list. Finally, four focus group participants discussed the wording of the attributes and levels and reduced the number of attributes to manageable numbers through voting ranking methods.

Results

Following the literature review and qualitative data collection, eight attributes were finally generated, each with two to three levels. The following attributes were included: 1) information provider; 2) health guidance approach; 3) adverse reactions; 4) flavor; 5) follow-up method; 6) follow-up frequency; 7) psychological support; 8) cost. These attributes covered the important attributes of nutritional preparations and health guidance included in ONS therapy that were relevant to patients.

Conclusions

This study’s mixed-methods approach has been found highly suitable to identify, refine and select attributes and levels for a discrete choice experiment. The three methods have pros and cons, and they complement each other, especially the analysis of qualitative data led to a deeper and broader understanding of attributes and levels.

Preferences for oral nutritional supplement therapy among postoperative patients with gastric cancer: a discrete choice experiment

Purposes

Patients after gastrectomy have poor compliance with oral nutritional supplement (ONS) therapy. Incorporating patient preferences into treatment decisions allows possible product improvements or treatment focus adjustments. The purpose of this research was to investigate the preferences for ONS therapy among postoperative patients with gastric cancer, and to provide person-centered oral nutrition management strategies.

Methods

A discrete choice experiment was designed and implemented within a Chinese cancer population. The survey was administered via paper-based questionnaires during face-to-face interviews with assistance from health professionals. A mixed logit model was used to estimate respondents’ preferences for different levels of nutrition therapy attributes.

Results

One hundred ninety respondents valued “Adverse reactions-almost none” (β 3.43 [SE, 0.28]) the most, followed by “Flavor-good taste” (β 0.68 [SE, 0.13]) and “Follow-up frequency-once every 2 weeks” (β 0.52 [SE, 0.13]), and were willing to pay more for these attribute levels. Respondents would be 93.73% more likely to accept a nutrition therapy program if there were almost no adverse reactions compared to the frequent adverse reactions.

Conclusions

Health professionals should pay attention to the management and prevention of adverse reactions when prescribing nutritional products, and provide diversified ONS products when necessary to meet patient preferences. When formulating intervention strategies, health professionals should also consider the different characteristics of patients, acknowledge the importance of the role of nurse specialists in a novel model of multidisciplinary nutritional care, standardize ONS information, follow up regularly, and encourage patients’ families to participate in daily nutrition care.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-07154-8.