The prognostic significance of controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score for surgically treated renal cell cancer and upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio as a novel prognostic biomarker for the oncological outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) on progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from a single-center nephroureterectomy registry between January 2011 and December 2017. Participants were categorized into high and low CAR groups based on the optimal CAR cut-off value determined using the Youden index. The primary endpoint was PFS, the time from RNU to metastasis or disease recurrence. The secondary endpoint was CSS, the time from RNU to UTUC-related death. Median PFS and CSS were compared between the high and low CAR groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to assess the prognostic significance of CAR, adjusting for known prognostic factors.

RESULTS

We included 491 patients with UTUC in the analysis. The optimal CAR cut-off value was determined to be 0.036, which resulted in classifying 49.3% (242/491) of patients into the high CAR group. The high CAR group had older patients (69.8 vs. 67.4, p-value = 0.01), advanced T and N stages (p-value<0.001), high-grade tumor (p-value = 0.03), and a higher incidence of preoperative hydronephrosis (p-value < 0.01) than the low CAR group. The high CAR group demonstrated significantly inferior median PFS (78.3 vs. 100.3 months, p-value < 0.01) and CSS (73.2 vs. 96.1 months, p-value < 0.01) than the low CAR group. Moreover, high CAR independently increased the risk of disease progression (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-2.64, p < 0.01) and UTUC-related mortality (HR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.15, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Pre-operative CAR is independently associated with poor PFS and CSS in patients with UTUC undergoing RNU. Moreover, CAR may be an independent UTUC prognostic factor, offering a cost-effective and minimally invasive marker. However, further validation through large-scale, multi-center studies is necessary to confirm these findings and determine the optimal CAR cut-off value.

Prognostic role of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in patients with biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous reports have not reached consistent results regarding the prognostic significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in biliary tract cancer (BTC). Therefore, the present meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the precise role of the CONUT score in predicting the prognosis of BTC.

METHODS

Electronic platforms including Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were comprehensively searched up to May 2, 2023. We also determined combined hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to estimate the role of the CONUT score in predicting the prognosis of patients with BTC.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 1,441 patients were included in the present study. Nine studies treated patients with surgical resection, and one study used percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting (PTBS) plus 125I seed intracavitary irradiation. Based on the combined data, a higher CONUT score significantly predicted dismal overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.94, 95%CI = 1.41-2.66, p < 0.001), inferior recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 1.79, 95%CI = 1.48-2.17, p < 0.001) in BTC, and low differentiation (OR = 1.57, 95%CI = 1.15-2.14, p = 0.004). Nonetheless, the CONUT score was not related to sex, lymph node metastasis, microvascular invasion, perineural invasion, distant metastasis, TNM stage, or tumor number in patients with BTC.

CONCLUSION

Higher CONUT scores significantly predicted worse OS and RFS in patients with BTC. Moreover, BTC patients with high CONUT scores tended to have poor tumor differentiation. The CONUT score could help clinicians stratify high-risk patients with BTC and devise individualized treatment plans.

Interpretations of the Role of Plasma Albumin in Prognostic Indices: A Literature Review

This review assesses how publications interpret factors that influence the serum or plasma albumin (PA) level in prognostic indices, focusing on inflammation and nutrition. On PubMed, a search for "albumin AND prognosis" yielded 23,919 results. From these records, prognostic indices were retrieved, and their names were used as search strings on PubMed. Indices found in 10 or more original research articles were included. The same search strings, restricted to "Review" or "Systematic review", retrieved yielded on the indices. The data comprised the 10 latest original research articles and up to 10 of the latest reviews. Thirty indices had 294 original research articles (6 covering two indices) and 131 reviews, most of which were from recent years. A total of 106 articles related the PA level to inflammation, and 136 related the PA level to nutrition. For the reviews, the equivalent numbers were 54 and 65. In conclusion, more publications mention the PA level as a marker of nutrition rather than inflammation. This is in contrast to several general reviews on albumin and nutritional guidelines, which state that the PA level is a marker of inflammation but not nutrition. Hypoalbuminemia should prompt clinicians to focus on the inflammatory aspects in their patients.

Prognostic Ability of Nutritional Indices for Outcomes of Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Nutrition has become an important parameter influencing the prognosis of several cancers. However, its impact on outcomes for bladder cancer (BC) is still unclear. This review examines the association between three commonly used nutritional indices, namely, the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), controlling nutritional status (CONUT), and the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and outcomes of BC.

METHODS

PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar were explored for studies published up to April 13, 2023. Data from studies were pooled to examine the association between PNI, CONUT, or GNRI and overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated significantly poor OS with low PNI versus high PNI in BC patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.37, 2.14; I2 = 0%). This result remained significant in various subgroup analyses. However, no association was noted between PNI and RFS (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.67, 2.24; I2 = 84%). Meta-analysis showed that patients with high CONUT scores had significantly poor OS (HR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.82, 3.25; I2 = 0%) as well as RFS (HR: 2.90; 95% CI: 2.10, 4.01; I2 = 0%). Data on GNRI were scarce and conflicting.

CONCLUSION

Limited data show that PNI and CONUT are predictive of outcomes in BC. Low PNI was associated with poor OS, while high CONUT was associated with poor OS and RFS. Data on GNRI are too scarce to obtain conclusions. Further studies are needed to supplement the results.

Prognostic and clinicopathological impacts of Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score on patients with gynecological cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score has proven to be a potential biomarker for determining the prognosis of patients with various types of cancer. Its value in determining the prognosis of patients with gynecological cancer, however, remains unknown. The present study was a meta-analysis that aimed to evaluate the prognostic and clinicopathological significance of the CONUT score in gynecological cancer.

METHODS

The Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were comprehensively searched through November 22, 2022. A pooled hazard ratio (HR), together with a 95% confidence interval (CI), was used to determine whether the CONUT score had prognostic value in terms of survival outcomes. Using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs, we estimated the relationship between the CONUT score and clinicopathological characteristics of gynecological cancer.

RESULTS

We evaluated 6 articles, involving a total of 2,569 cases, in the present study. According to the results of our analyses, higher CONUT scores were significantly correlated with decreased overall survival (OS) (n = 6; HR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.13-2.04; P = 0.006; I2 = 57.4%; Ph = 0.038) and progression-free survival (PFS) (n = 4; HR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.25-1.84; P < 0.001; I2 = 0; Ph = 0.682) in gynecological cancer. Moreover, higher CONUT scores were significantly correlated with a histological grade of G3 (n = 3; OR = 1.76; 95% CI = 1.18-2.62; P = 0.006; I2 = 0; Ph = 0.980), a tumor size ≥ 4 cm (n = 2; OR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.12-2.01; P = 0.007; I2 = 0; Ph = 0.721), and an advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (n = 2; OR = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.54-4.11; P < 0.001; I2 = 45.5%; Ph = 0.175). The correlation between the CONUT score and lymph node metastasis, however, was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher CONUT scores were significantly correlated with decreased OS and PFS in gynecological cancer. The CONUT score, therefore, is a promising and cost-effective biomarker for predicting survival outcomes in gynecological cancer.

Prognostic value of pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status score in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis

Background and purpose: The association between the pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients remains unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to further elucidate the prognostic role of the pretreatment CONUT score in esophageal cancer based on current evidence. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CNKI databases were searched up to 27 September 2022. The primary and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)/cancer-specific survival (CSS), and the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled for analysis. Results: A total of 11 retrospective studies involving 3,783 participants were included. The pooled results demonstrated that a higher pretreatment CONUT score was significantly related to poor OS (HR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.31-2.54, p < 0.001), and subgroup analysis stratified by pathological type showed similar results. In addition, the pretreatment CONUT score was associated with poor PFS (HR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.10-1.28, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.77-4.02, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The pretreatment CONUT score was predictive of worse prognosis in esophageal cancer, and patients with a higher CONUT score showed worse survival.

Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score as a Potential Prognostic Indicator of In-Hospital Mortality, Sepsis and Length of Stay in an Internal Medicine Department

The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score represents poor nutritional status and has been identified as an indicator of adverse outcomes. Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic role of the CONUT score on in-hospital outcomes in an Internal Medicine Department. This is a retrospective study analyzing data from 369 patients, divided into four groups based on the CONUT score: normal (0-1), mild-high (2-4), moderate-high (5-8), and marked high (9-12). In-hospital all-cause mortality increased from normal to marked high CONUT score group (2.2% vs. 3.6% vs. 13.4% vs. 15.3%, p < 0.009). Furthermore, a higher CONUT score was linked to a longer length of hospital stay (LOS) (9.48 ± 6.22 vs. 11.09 ± 7.11 vs. 12.45 ± 7.88 vs. 13.10 ± 8.12, p < 0.013) and an increased prevalence of sepsis. The excess risk of a high CONUT score relative to a low CONUT score remained significant after adjusting for confounders (all-cause mortality: OR: 3.3, 95% CI: 1.1-9.7, p < 0.02; sepsis: OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.5-4.9, p < 0.01; LOS: OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.2-3.9, p < 0.007). The present study demonstrated that an increased CONUT score is related to a higher risk of short-term in-hospital death and complications.

Clinical significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in gastric cancer patients: A meta-analysis of 9,764 participants

Background

The clinical value of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score has been widely reported in multiple malignancies. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between the CONUT score and clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search of electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was performed up to December 2022. The primary endpoints were survival outcomes and postoperative complications. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed during the pooled analysis.

Results

Nineteen studies including 9,764 patients were included. The pooled results indicated that patients in the high CONUT group had a worse overall survival (HR = 1.70 95%CI: 1.54-1.87; P < 0.0001; I ² = 33%) and recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.57; 95%CI: 1.36-1.82; P < 0.0001; I ² = 30%), and a higher risk of complications (OR = 1.96; 95%CI: 1.50-2.57; P < 0.0001; I ² = 69%). In addition, a high CONUT score was significantly associated with larger tumor size, higher percentage of microvascular invasion, later TNM stage and fewer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, but not with tumor differentiation.

Conclusion

Based on existing evidence, the CONUT score could act as a valuable biomarker to predict clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer. Clinicians could use this useful indicator to stratify patients and formulate individual treatment plans.

Low prognostic nutritional index is associated with poor outcome in middle-aged and elderly patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and age are effective prognostic factors for patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and an interaction between them may exist. However, the age cutoff value is generally set at 45 years in current studies. The clinical implications of PNI in middle-aged and elderly patients are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to uncover this issue.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 132 middle-aged and elderly (≥ 45 years old) patients with non-metastatic NPC. The association between covariates and the PNI was analyzed using ² or t-test. The effect of PNI on the prognosis was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted models were applied. Stratified and interactive analyses were performed to investigate the potential source of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Median age (61.0 years versus 59.5 years) and the proportion of patients aged ≥ 60 years (57.6% versus 50.0%) in the low-PNI group were higher than those in the high-PNI group (P > 0.05). The patients with a low PNI had shorter overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.80-0.93; P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.87-0.99; P = 0.034). The results remained stable after three adjusted models of covariates, including age (P < 0.05). No significant interactions were observed in middle-aged (45-59 years) and elderly (≥ 60 years) subgroups for OS and PFS (P for interaction > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although there is an interaction between PNI and age, PNI is an independent prognostic factor in middle-aged and elderly patients with non-metastatic NPC.

Prognostic Potential of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score in Predicting All-Cause Mortality and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Background

As defined by the Controlling Nutrition Status (CONUT) score, the prognostic significance of nutritional status has attracted attention in patients with cardiovascular disease. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the importance of CONUT score for prediction of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in adult patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods

Observational studies conducted to evaluate the association of CONUT score with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with CAD were included. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library, Google scholar, medRxiv pre-print as well as Science Direct search engine for studies published from the inception of each database until March 21, 2022. Studies reporting the utility of CONUT score in prediction of all-cause mortality and MACE among patients with CAD were eligible. Predictive potential of the CONUT score were summarized by pooling the multivariable adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) with 95% CI for the malnourished vs. normal nutritional status or per point CONUT score increase.

Results

Of 2,547 screened citation, nine observational studies involving 81,257 patients with CAD were analyzed. Malnutrition defined by the CONUT score was associated with significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality when compared with the normal nutritional state (aHR for mild, moderate, and severe malnutrition, respectively: (1.21 [95% CI: 1.15–1.27], I² = 0%), (1.53 [95% CI: 1.26–1.84], I² = 84%), and (2.24 [95% CI: 1.57–3.19], I² = 77%). Similarly, moderate (aHR 1.71 [95% CI: 1.44–2.03], I² = 0%) and severe (aHR 2.66 [95% CI: 1.82–3.89], I² = 0%) malnutrition was associated with a significantly higher risk of MACE compared with the normal nutritional state. Additionally, per point increase in the CONUT score was correlated with 20 and 23% additional risk of all-cause mortality and MACE, respectively.

Conclusion

As defined by the CONUT score, malnutrition is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and MACE in CAD patients. Nutritional assessment with CONUT score could allow clinicians to identify patients with CAD at high risk for adverse clinical outcomes.