Study to establish visual acuity norms with Teller Acuity Cards II for infants from southern China

Clinical usefulness of the baby vision test in young children and its correlation with the Snellen chart

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of a new visual acuity (VA) screening method, the baby vision test for young children.

METHODS

A total 105 eyes of 65 children aged 2-8y were included in the study. Acuity testing was conducted using a standardized recognition acuity chart (Snellen visual chart: at 3 m) and the baby vision model assessment. The baby vision device includes a screen, a near infrared camera and a computer. Children were seated at a measured distance of 33-40 cm from a display for testing. VA was estimated according to the highest resolution the children could follow. Decimal VA data were converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for statistical analysis. The VA results for each child were recorded and analyzed for consistency.

RESULTS

The mean VA measured using the Snellen visual chart was 0.62±0.32, and that assessed using the baby vision test was 0.66±0.27. The 95% limit of agreement was -0.609 to 0.695, with 95.2% (100/105) plots within the 95% limits of agreement. VA values of the baby vision test were significantly correlated with those of the Snellen chart (R=0.274, P=0.005).

CONCLUSION

The baby vision test can be used as a relatively reliable method for estimating VA in young children. This new acuity assessment might be a valid predictor of optotype-measured acuity later in preverbal children.

Maximizing valid eye-tracking data in human and macaque infants by optimizing calibration and adjusting areas of interest

Remote eye tracking with automated corneal reflection provides insights into the emergence and development of cognitive, social, and emotional functions in human infants and non-human primates. However, because most eye-tracking systems were designed for use in human adults, the accuracy of eye-tracking data collected in other populations is unclear, as are potential approaches to minimize measurement error. For instance, data quality may differ across species or ages, which are necessary considerations for comparative and developmental studies. Here we examined how the calibration method and adjustments to areas of interest (AOIs) of the Tobii TX300 changed the mapping of fixations to AOIs in a cross-species longitudinal study. We tested humans (N = 119) at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 14 months of age and macaques (Macaca mulatta; N = 21) at 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 6 months of age. In all groups, we found improvement in the proportion of AOI hits detected as the number of successful calibration points increased, suggesting calibration approaches with more points may be advantageous. Spatially enlarging and temporally prolonging AOIs increased the number of fixation-AOI mappings, suggesting improvements in capturing infants' gaze behaviors; however, these benefits varied across age groups and species, suggesting different parameters may be ideal, depending on the population studied. In sum, to maximize usable sessions and minimize measurement error, eye-tracking data collection and extraction approaches may need adjustments for the age groups and species studied. Doing so may make it easier to standardize and replicate eye-tracking research findings.

Grating acuity tests for infants, young children and individuals with disabilities: A review of recent advances

BACKGROUND

Accurate measurement of visual acuity is important in managing any ocular condition. Measuring visual acuity has always remained a challenge in infants, young children and individuals with disabilities who are unable to respond verbally. A variety of pediatric acuity tests that include both grating and recognition acuities have been described in the literature, some of which are outdated. This review paper aims to summarize the currently available and recently developed grating acuity tests that can be used for infants, young children and individuals with disabilities.

METHODS

A review of literature was carried out to identify tests that were currently available and recently developed. Additionally, search was also done on popular search engines and websites of companies. Tests identified were screened for availability and investigated for validity through published research in peer-reviewed journals.

RESULTS

A total of eight grating acuity tests were identified, out of which six of them were paper-based tests. The remaining two tests were app-based tests with established data for the typically developing pediatric cohort. The repeatability indices were available only for four grating acuity tests.

CONCLUSIONS

This review paper summarizes the basic features of the grating acuity tests and importantly, the parameters that determine the clinical utility of the tests such as the testability, acuity range, specific cohort studied, testing time and reliability indices. The paper also discusses the recent technological advancements in the field of acuity testing for the pediatric cohort and its comparisons with the conventional methods when available.