JCGA: the Japanese version of the Cancer Genome Atlas and its contribution to the interpretation of gene alterations detected in clinical cancer genome sequencing

Study Protocol for a Prospective Self-Controlled Trial on Success in Meeting Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Analysis Criteria for Specimens Obtained by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using a 19G Needle from Primary and Metastatic Lesions in Pancreatic Cancer with Metastatic Lesions: The PRIMATE Study

EUS-TA in unresectable pancreatic cancer requires not only a tissue diagnosis but also tissue collection in anticipation of comprehensive genomic profiling. However, the optimal puncture target remains controversial. Therefore, the Primary and Metastatic Lesions in Pancreatic Cancer (PRIMATE) study was designed to clarify the optimal target by comparing the success rates for meeting OncoGuide NCC Oncopanel (NOP) analysis criteria on pre-check primary and metastatic lesion specimens obtained during the same EUS-TA session in patients with invasive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. In this ongoing prospective study, two specimens, each from primary and metastatic lesions, are obtained by EUS-TA (typically using a 19G fine-needle biopsy needle) in patients with invasive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The primary endpoint is the proportion of EUS-TA specimens that meet NOP analysis criteria during pre-check (i.e., tumor cellularity of ≥20% and a tissue area of ≥4 mm2), which are then compared between primary and metastatic lesions. This study has been approved by the National Cancer Center Institutional Review Board (Research No. 2022-168). The results of this study will be reported at an international conference and published in an international peer-reviewed journal. The trial registration number is UMIN 000048966.

Clinical and Diagnostic Utility of Genomic Profiling for Digestive Cancers: Real-World Evidence from Japan

The usefulness of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in the Japanese healthcare insurance system remains underexplored. Therefore, this large-scale study aimed to determine the usefulness of CGP in diagnosing digestive cancers. Patients with various cancer types recruited between March 2020 and October 2022 underwent the FoundationOne® CDx assay at the Keio PleSSision Group (19 hospitals in Japan). A scoring system was developed to identify potentially actionable genomic alterations of biological significance and actionable genomic alterations. The detection rates for potentially actionable genomic alterations, actionable genomic alterations, and alterations equivalent to companion diagnosis (CDx), as well as the signaling pathways associated with these alterations in each digestive cancer, were analyzed. Among the 1587 patients, 547 had digestive cancer. The detection rates of potentially actionable genomic alterations, actionable genomic alterations, and alterations equivalent to CDx were 99.5%, 62.5%, and 11.5%, respectively. APC, KRAS, and CDKN2A alterations were frequently observed in colorectal, pancreatic, and biliary cancers, respectively. Most digestive cancers, except esophageal cancer, were adenocarcinomas. Thus, the classification flowchart for digestive adenocarcinomas proposed in this study may facilitate precise diagnosis. CGP has clinical and diagnostic utility in digestive cancers.

Genomic landscape of pancreatic cancer in the Japanese version of the Cancer Genome Atlas

Background

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most aggressive cancers worldwide. Although many studies have investigated genomic alterations, the genomic landscape of Japanese PC patients has not been fully elucidated.

Methods

We used whole-exome sequencing, cancer gene panel deep-sequencing, and microarray gene expression profiling data derived from the Japanese version of the Cancer Genome Atlas (JCGA) in 93 PC cases.

Results

Somatic driver mutations were identified in 65.6% of samples in 19 genes. The median tumor mutation burden (TMB) value was 0.24 Muts/Mb (interquartile range, 0.15-0.64 Muts/Mb). The commonly mutated genes were KRAS (58%), TP53 (40%), CDKN2A (10%), SMAD4 (10%), FGFR2 (9%), and PKHD1 (9%). Frequent germline variation genes were BRCA1 (8%), CDH1 (5%), MET (5%), MSH6 (5%), and TEK (5%). Frequent chromosomal arm alterations included copy number gains in 2q (42%), 7q (24%), and 3q (24%), and copy number losses in 19p (62%), 19q (47%), 12q (34%), and 7q (30%). A prognostic analysis according to the presence of driver mutations showed that overall survival (OS) in the driver mutation-positive group was significantly worse in comparison to that of the driver mutation-negative group (median, 23.1 vs 46.7 mo; P = .010). A Cox proportional hazards analysis for OS identified driver mutation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; P = .025) and lymph node metastasis (HR, 3.27; P = .002) as independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion

The present results from the JCGA dataset constitute a fundamental resource for genomic medicine for PC patients, especially in Japan.