Efficacy and safety of esaxerenone in patients with hypertension and concomitant heart failure

Efficacy and Safety of Esaxerenone in Hypertensive Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (ESES-LVH) Study: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Prospective, Interventional Study

INTRODUCTION

In contrast to the antihypertensive effect of esaxerenone, there is little evidence of its cardioprotective effect. We investigated the efficacy and safety of esaxerenone in patients with uncontrolled hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy taking a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) or calcium-channel blocker (CCB).

METHODS

This was a multicenter, open-label, exploratory study with a 24-week treatment period. Esaxerenone was orally administered at an initial dose of 2.5 mg/day (maximum dose: 5 mg/day). The primary endpoints were the change in morning home systolic blood pressure (BP)/diastolic BP and change and percentage change in left ventricular mass index (LVMI) from baseline to end of treatment (EOT). Key secondary endpoints included change from baseline in bedtime home and office BP, achievement rate of target BP, and safety.

RESULTS

In total, 60 patients were enrolled. Morning home systolic/diastolic BP was significantly decreased from baseline to EOT in the total population (- 11.5/ - 4.7 mmHg, p < 0.001) and in both the RASi and CCB subcohorts (all p < 0.01). Significant reductions in bedtime home and office BP were shown in the total population and both subcohorts. LVMI was also significantly decreased from baseline to EOT in the total population (- 9.9 g/m2, - 8.5%, both p < 0.001) and both subcohorts (all p < 0.05). The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and drug-related TEAEs were 35.0% and 3.3%, respectively; most were mild or moderate. No new safety concerns were identified.

CONCLUSION

Esaxerenone showed favorable antihypertensive and cardioprotective effects and safety in hypertensive patients with cardiac hypertrophy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs071190043).

The role of blood pressure management in stroke prevention: current status and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

Stroke is the second-leading cause of death worldwide and the second-leading cause of disability-adjusted life-years. It is well known that hypertension is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular events, including stroke.

AREAS COVERED

Recent interventional trials have demonstrated the superiority of intensive blood pressure (BP) control for prevention of cardiovascular events compared to standard BP control. Notably, in the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial, intensive BP control showed superiority in the prevention of stroke events in elderly hypertensive patients. Novel medications such as angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors have the potential to suppress various CVD events including stroke. Non-pharmacological antihypertensive therapies such as renal denervation have demonstrated BP-lowering effects and may be useful for stroke prevention. Additionally, new methods and systems of BP monitoring including various kinds of nighttime BP measurement devices, wearable devices, and methods using information and communication technology can be used to assess the pathophysiology of BP variability as a risk factor and an event trigger of stroke incidence.

EXPERT OPINION

Novel therapies and new technologies for BP evaluation strongly support the development of individualized anticipatory medicine, which should be useful for the prevention of stroke.

The Time to Reconsider Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blocking Strategy: Arrival of Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blockers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The study aims to verify the advantages of nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blockers (MRBs) in the management of hypertension and cardiovascular and renal diseases, comparing with conventional MRBs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Based on the unique structures, the nonsteroidal MRBs have higher selectivity for mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs) and show no agonist activity for major steroid hormone receptors in contrast to steroidal MRBs. Today, there are two nonsteroidal MRBs, esaxerenone and finerenone, which completed phase 3 clinical trials. Series of clinical trials have shown that both agents achieve similar MR blockade with smaller doses as compared with steroidal MRBs, but have no off-target side effect such as gynecomastia. Esaxerenone has persistent blood pressure-lowering effects in various hypertensive populations, including essential hypertension and those with diabetes and/or chronic kidney disease, while finerenone has demonstrated reduction of the cardiovascular risk rather than blood pressure in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Nonsteroidal MRBs are a more refined agent which contributes to appropriate MR blocking with minimized unpleasant adverse effects.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Esaxerenone, a Novel Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist: A Review

Esaxerenone is a selective, nonsteroidal, high-affinity mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist recently approved in Japan for the treatment of hypertension. It has high oral biovailability, a large volume of distribution, and is primarly metabolized in liver and excreted in bile. Esaxerenone is an efficient antihypertensive, whether given alone or as add-on therapy. The antihypertensive effect is accompanied by renoprotective action, which is being further investigated in current clinical trials. Due to its relatively long half-life and high affinity for the mineralocorticoid receptor, esaxerenone is administered once daily and in low absolute doses. The safety of esaxerenone is considerable, since hyperkalemia is not frequent and, when it does appear, not sustained. Endocrine adverse events, which frequently occur with steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, are extremely rare with esaxerenone. Although the risk of clinically significant drug-drug interactions is not high, esaxerenone treatment should start with low doses, with subsequent titration to achieve the optimal clinical effect, all while monitoring serum potassium and paying attention to concomitant therapy with drugs that may induce or inhibit esaxerenone metabolism. This review article offers comprehensive information about the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of esaxerenone in humans, which should help clinicians to more precisely tailor esaxerenone dosing regimens to their patients.

Implication of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Esaxerenone in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background: The implications of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, including the newly introduced esaxerenone, on cardiac reverse remodeling in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remain uncertain. Methods and Results: We included patients with HFpEF who received esaxerenone for hypertension between November 2019 and July 2021 in this retrospective study. Changes in left ventricular mass index (LVMI) were compared between the 6-month pretreatment period (without esaxerenone) and the 6-month treatment period (on esaxerenone). Thirty-three patients (median age 74 years [interquartile range {IQR} 70-81 years]; 33% male, median systolic blood pressure [SBP] 135 mmHg [IQR 123-148 mmHg]) were included in the study and completed 6-month esaxerenone therapy without any adverse events. During the pretreatment period, SBP decreased significantly (P=0.009), whereas LVMI remained unchanged (P=0.30). During the esaxerenone treatment period, both SBP and LVMI decreased significantly (P=0.003 and P=0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Esaxerenone may have beneficial effects of reverse remodeling in patients with HFpEF when used to treat hypertension. Further studies are needed to understand which patient populations may see greater benefits with esaxerenone.

Safety and efficacy of esaxerenone in Japanese hypertensive patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A retrospective study

Esaxerenone, a mineralocorticoid receptor blocker (MRB), is a new antihypertensive agent. However, esaxerenone-related data with respect to hypertension with heart failure are limited. We investigated the safety and efficacy of esaxerenone in hypertensive patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Hypertensive patients with HFrEF treated with esaxerenone were retrospectively analyzed at two timepoints (short-term: 35±15 days; mid-term: 167±45 days). Adverse events including hyperkalemia (K⁺ >5.5 mEq/L), worsening renal function (WRF; estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) reduction by ≥20%), and hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) were evaluated. eGFR and K⁺, serum creatinine, and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels at baseline, short-term, and mid-term assessments were compared. Patients administered esaxerenone as their first MRB (first-MRB cohort) and those who converted from another MRB (conversion cohort) were separately analyzed. There were 50 (56±10 years old, 26% female) patients. At the short-term assessment, hyperkalemia or hypotension was not observed at a dose of 2.0±0.9 mg/day. Seven patients (14%) showed WRF. K⁺ was slightly elevated (4.12±0.41 to 4.25±0.39 mmol/L, p = 0.07) and eGFR was significantly reduced (66.9±19.6 mL/min/1.73 m² to 62.4±19.7 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.006). In the conversion cohort, significant changes in K⁺ and eGFR from baseline were not observed at the short-term assessment. BNP levels were consistently improved regardless of the cohorts (first-MRB cohort, 310 [110–370] pg/mL to 137 [47–152] pg/mL, p = 0.001; conversion cohort, 181 [30–203] pg/mL to 108 [26–146] pg/mL, p = 0.028). At the mid-term assessment, there were no significant changes in K⁺ and eGFR compared with the short-term assessment. In conclusion, esaxerenone was safe for hypertensive patients with HFrEF. Hyperkalemia and hypotension were rarely noted, while eGFR was marginally reduced. Moreover, esaxerenone might be beneficial for HFrEF in terms of BNP level reduction.

Characterization of Direct Perturbations on Voltage-Gated Sodium Current by Esaxerenone, a Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blocker

Esaxerenone (ESAX; CS-3150, Minnebro^®) is known to be a newly non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist. However, its modulatory actions on different types of ionic currents in electrically excitable cells remain largely unanswered. The present investigations were undertaken to explore the possible perturbations of ESAX on the transient, late and persistent components of voltage-gated Na⁺ current (I_Na) identified from pituitary GH₃ or MMQ cells. GH₃-cell exposure to ESAX depressed the transient and late components of I_Na with varying potencies. The IC₅₀ value of ESAX required for its differential reduction in peak or late I_Na in GH₃ cells was estimated to be 13.2 or 3.2 μM, respectively. The steady-state activation curve of peak I_Na remained unchanged during exposure to ESAX; however, recovery of peak I_Na block was prolonged in the presence 3 μM ESAX. In continued presence of aldosterone (10 μM), further addition of 3 μM ESAX remained effective at inhibiting I_Na. ESAX (3 μM) potently reversed Tef-induced augmentation of I_Na. By using isosceles-triangular ramp pulse with varying durations, the amplitude of persistent I_Na measured at high or low threshold was enhanced by the presence of tefluthrin (Tef), in combination with the appearance of the figure-of-eight hysteretic loop; moreover, hysteretic strength of the current was attenuated by subsequent addition of ESAX. Likewise, in MMQ lactotrophs, the addition of ESAX also effectively decreased the peak amplitude of I_Na along with the increased current inactivation rate. Taken together, the present results provide a noticeable yet unidentified finding disclosing that, apart from its antagonistic effect on MR receptor, ESAX may directly and concertedly modify the amplitude, gating properties and hysteresis of I_Na in electrically excitable cells.