1
|
Scarborough RO, Bailey KE, Sri AE, Browning GF, Hardefeldt LY. Seeking simplicity, navigating complexity: How veterinarians select an antimicrobial drug, dose, and duration for companion animals. J Vet Intern Med 2024. [PMID: 39304497 DOI: 10.1111/jvim.17197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimizing harm from antimicrobials requires use of the narrowest spectrum drug, at an effective dose for the minimum effective duration. Many prescribers are not currently following these guidelines. To address suboptimal antimicrobial use, the underlying reasons must be understood. OBJECTIVES To identify factors influencing choices of antimicrobial drug, dose, and duration for companion animals. SUBJECTS Twenty-two veterinarians treating companion animals in Australia. Diversity of participants was deliberately sought. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted online. Two case studies were discussed, and then a range of broader questions was posed. Transcripts were analyzed thematically, using an inductive approach. RESULTS Few participants chose guideline-concordant management for the case studies. Prescribing choices were influenced by a complex array of factors associated with the clinical case, pet owner, drug, veterinarian, veterinary colleagues, and external factors. Key factors driving broad-spectrum antimicrobial use included a sense of safety, habit, ease of administering the drug (especially in cats), pharmaceutical marketing, and the self-perpetuating dispensary cycle. Many participants were concerned about antimicrobial resistance, but insufficiently informed about how to minimize this risk. Several participants believed that longer duration of treatment and ensuring patients finish a predetermined course would decrease the risk of antimicrobial resistance and improve clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE Veterinarians are engaged with the concept of antimicrobial stewardship, but face numerous practical barriers and require more information. In particular, improved education is needed on enhancing patient safety by minimizing both spectrum of activity and duration of treatment, and dispelling myths about "finishing the course."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ri O Scarborough
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute of Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kirsten E Bailey
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute of Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna Ellen Sri
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute of Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Glenn Francis Browning
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute of Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Laura Y Hardefeldt
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute of Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Allel K, Fernandez-Miyakawa M, Gaze W, Petroni A, Corso A, Luna F, Barcelona L, Boden L, Pitchforth E. Opportunities and challenges in antimicrobial resistance policy including animal production systems and humans across stakeholders in Argentina: a context and qualitative analysis. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e082156. [PMID: 38889938 PMCID: PMC11191766 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gaps in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance and control, including implementation of national action plans (NAPs), are evident internationally. Countries' capacity to translate political commitment into action is crucial to cope with AMR at the human-animal-environment interface. METHODS We employed a two-stage process to understand opportunities and challenges related to AMR surveillance and control at the human-animal interface in Argentina. First, we compiled the central AMR policies locally and mapped vital stakeholders around the NAP and the national commission against bacterial resistance. Second, we conducted qualitative interviews using a semistructured questionnaire covering stakeholders' understanding and progress towards AMR and NAP. We employed a mixed deductive-inductive approach and used the constant comparative analysis method. We created categories and themes to cluster subthemes and determined crucial relationships among thematic groups. RESULTS Crucial AMR policy developments have been made since 1969, including gradually banning colistin in food-producing animals. In 2023, a new government decree prioritised AMR following the 2015 NAP launch. Our qualitative analyses identified seven major themes for tackling AMR: (I) Cultural factors and sociopolitical country context hampering AMR progress, (II) Fragmented governance, (III) Antibiotic access and use, (IV) AMR knowledge and awareness throughout stakeholders, (V) AMR surveillance, (VI) NAP efforts and (VII) External drivers. We identified a fragmented structure of the food production chain, poor cross-coordination between stakeholders, limited surveillance and regulation among food-producing animals and geographical disparities over access, diagnosis and treatment. The country is moving to integrate animal and food production into its surveillance system, with most hospitals experienced in monitoring AMR through antimicrobial stewardship programmes. CONCLUSION AMR accountability should involve underpinning collaboration at different NAP implementation levels and providing adequate resources to safeguard long-term sustainability. Incorporating a multisectoral context-specific approach relying on different One Health domains is crucial to strengthening local AMR surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasim Allel
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Heatlh Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | | | - William Gaze
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Alejandro Petroni
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Alejandra Corso
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Laura Barcelona
- Comisión Nacional de Control de la Resistencia Antimicrobiana, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Lisa Boden
- University of Edinburgh Royal Dick School of Veterinary Studies, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, UK
| | - Emma Pitchforth
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Weese JS, Mosher M, Low R, West E, O'Kelley B, Morrison JA, Kimmerlein A, St. Bernard S, Blackie K, Gronlund U, Battersby I. Evaluation of antimicrobial purchasing by companion animal veterinary facilities in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America (2019-2021). J Vet Intern Med 2024; 38:1520-1534. [PMID: 38660791 PMCID: PMC11099783 DOI: 10.1111/jvim.17068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measuring antimicrobial use is a core component of antimicrobial stewardship. Purchasing data may be easier to obtain than prescription data in some situations, but differences in clinic size, caseload and collection timeframes must be considered. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to evaluate purchases of systemic antibacterial agents by small animal veterinary facilities in 5 networks across 3 countries, using a mg/veterinarian full time equivalent (FTE)/week as the metric. METHODS Data were obtained from purchasing records of 2194 veterinary facilities from networks from the United States (US, n = 3: US-A, 1036 facilities; US-B, 101 facilities; US-C, 886 facilities), Canada (n = 1: 117 facilities) and the United Kingdom (UK, n = 1: 54 facilities) during 2019-2021. RESULTS In total, 20 020 269 767 mg (20.02 t) of antimicrobials were purchased. Overall differences between the UK and North America were driven by significantly higher purchases of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in the UK (P < .001), with substantially less purchasing of third generation cephalosporins in the UK (P < .0001). A significant association was found between FTE and purchasing, with decreased purchasing (mg/FTE/week) as facility FTE increased. Significant differences also were found among US regions. Facilities in the top 10% of total purchasing accounted for 23%-30% of purchases, compared to only 1.6%-3.8% for the bottom 10%. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE These data provide useful information about general purchasing trends, inter- and intraregional differences and differences among facility types and identify high purchasing outliers for further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ben O'Kelley
- BluePearl Veterinary Partners LLCTampaFloridaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Becker SD, Hughes DM. Patient weight has diverse effects on the prescribing of different antibiotics to dogs. Front Vet Sci 2024; 11:1358535. [PMID: 38440386 PMCID: PMC10910008 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1358535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Various factors including body weight-associated treatment cost may influence the probability of dispensing antibiotics to dogs in first-opinion practice, but their effect on specific drug choice remains unclear. Methods Multiple membership regression modeling was used to investigate the probability of dispensing 12 different antibiotics to dogs of different weights in the context of various disease presentations, using anonymized data obtained from electronic health records of 18 clinics between 2020 and 2022. Data from 14,259 dogs were analyzed. Results Treatment choice varied significantly with animal weight. Higher body weight was associated with an increased likelihood of dispensing lower cost antimicrobials such as amoxicillin and trimethoprim sulfonamide, while use of higher cost antimicrobials such as cefovecin was strongly biased to smaller animals. However, these effects were limited when restricted treatment options were available for the target condition. Conclusion This work demonstrates that anticipated financial costs may result in different treatment choices for canine patients depending on their body weight. Further work is needed to understand the impact of financial pressures on veterinarians' treatment choices, and the implications for the optimization of antimicrobial stewardship in first opinion practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart D. Becker
- Department of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Pathobiology and Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - David M. Hughes
- Department of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Richards S, Bailey KE, Scarborough R, Gilkerson JR, Browning GF, Hur B, Ierardo J, Awad M, Chay R, Hardefeldt LY. Cross-sectional evaluation of a large-scale antimicrobial stewardship trial in Australian companion animal practices. Vet Rec 2024; 194:e3268. [PMID: 37518680 DOI: 10.1002/vetr.3268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) are critically important for improving the appropriate use of antimicrobial agents in veterinary practice. METHODS One of three ASPs was implemented in 135 Australian general veterinary practices in 2018-2020. The ASP interventions and the perceived impact they had on antimicrobial prescribing were assessed by the veterinarians working in these veterinary practices. An online survey was distributed to all 520 veterinarians working in the trial practices and 267 responses were analysed. RESULTS Most veterinarians (174/267, 65%) thought they had an ASP at their clinic and most respondents who said that they were aware that they had an ASP at their clinic indicated that they had changed the way they prescribed antimicrobials because of the trial (125/170, 74%). Antimicrobial prescribing guidelines, the traffic light system for indicating antimicrobial importance, delayed prescribing and antimicrobial stewardship champions were reported to have had the biggest impact. LIMITATIONS All practices in the trial belong to a single corporate group, which may impact the external validity of these results when applied to general small animal practice. CONCLUSION Antimicrobial stewardship has a positive impact on antimicrobial prescribing in veterinary medicine and future interventions should focus on the implementation of the effective interventions identified in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanna Richards
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Peter Doherty Institute, National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kirsten E Bailey
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Peter Doherty Institute, National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ri Scarborough
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Peter Doherty Institute, National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - James R Gilkerson
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Peter Doherty Institute, National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Glenn F Browning
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Peter Doherty Institute, National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brian Hur
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Peter Doherty Institute, National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- School of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jessica Ierardo
- Greencross Pet Wellness Company, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Magdoline Awad
- Greencross Pet Wellness Company, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachel Chay
- Greencross Pet Wellness Company, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Laura Y Hardefeldt
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Peter Doherty Institute, National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Farrell S, Bagcigil AF, Chaintoutis SC, Firth C, Aydin FG, Hare C, Maaland M, Mateus A, Vale AP, Windahl U, Damborg P, Timofte D, Singleton D, Allerton F. A multinational survey of companion animal veterinary clinicians: How can antimicrobial stewardship guidelines be optimised for the target stakeholder? Vet J 2024; 303:106045. [PMID: 38000694 DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2023.106045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
Antimicrobial stewardship initiatives are widely regarded as a cornerstone for ameliorating the global health impact of antimicrobial resistance. Within companion animal health, such efforts have largely focused on development and dissemination of antimicrobial stewardship guidelines (ASGs). However, there have been few attempts to understand veterinarian attitudes towards and knowledge of ASGs or to determine how awareness regarding ASGs might best be increased. An online survey regarding ASGs was formulated for veterinarians who treat companion animals. The survey was distributed across 46 European and associated countries between 12 January and 30 June, 2022. In total, 2271 surveys were completed, with 64.9% of respondents (n = 1474) reporting awareness and usage of at least one ASG. Respondents from countries with greater awareness of ASGs tended to report more appropriate use of antimicrobials (Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.6084, P ≤ 0.001), with respondents from countries with country-specific ASGs tending to score highest across both awareness and appropriate use domains. Respondents prioritised guidance around antimicrobial choice (82.0%, n = 1863), duration of treatment (66.0%, n = 1499), and dosage (51.9%, n = 1179) for inclusion in future ASGs, with 78.0% (n = 1776) of respondents preferring ASGs to be integrated into their patient management system. Awareness of ASGs and their use in companion animal veterinary practice appears to be greater than previously reported, with respondents tending to report antimicrobial prescription decision making broadly in line with current clinical recommendations. However, further initiatives aimed at maximising accessibility to ASGs both within countries and individual veterinary practices are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Farrell
- Department of Computer Science, Durham University, Durham, UK
| | - A F Bagcigil
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - S C Chaintoutis
- Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 11 Stavrou Voutyra str., Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - C Firth
- Unit of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria
| | - F G Aydin
- Ankara University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 06070 Altindag/Ankara, Turkey
| | - C Hare
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK
| | - M Maaland
- Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 4325 Sandnes, Norway
| | - A Mateus
- World Organisation for Animal Health, 12 Rue de Prony, 75017 Paris, France
| | - A P Vale
- School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, UCD Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
| | - U Windahl
- Swedish National Veterinary Institute, 75189 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - P Damborg
- Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Stigbøjlen 4, 1870 Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - D Timofte
- Department of Veterinary Anatomy Physiology and Pathology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston CH64 7TE, UK
| | - D Singleton
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - F Allerton
- Willows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service, part of Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Highlands Road, Shirley, Solihull B90 4NH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Allerton F, Granick J. Antimicrobial resistance: should vets have prescriber autonomy or formulary restriction in small animal practice? Vet Rec 2023; 193:418-419. [PMID: 37975467 DOI: 10.1002/vetr.3702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Fergus Allerton and Jennifer Granick discuss the different approaches to antimicrobial stewardship and the potential implications of the 'carrot' (enablement) versus 'stick' (legislative change) strategies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Foglia Manzillo V, Peruzy MF, Gizzarelli M, Izzo B, Sarnelli P, Carrella A, Vinciguerra G, Chirollo C, Ben Fayala NEH, Balestrino I, Oliva G. Examining the Veterinary Electronic Antimicrobial Prescriptions for Dogs and Cats in the Campania Region, Italy: Corrective Strategies Are Imperative. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:2869. [PMID: 37760269 PMCID: PMC10525136 DOI: 10.3390/ani13182869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Companion animals are increasingly being recognised as important contributors to the spread of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. The present work aimed to measure the antimicrobial drug prescribing in dogs and cats in the Campania Region, Italy by analysing the Veterinary Electronic Prescriptions (VEPs) between 2019 and 2020. The medical records associated with antimicrobial drug prescriptions were collected according to the drug administration (systemic or topical) and the rationale for the treatment chosen. In the period under investigation, 166,879 drugs were prescribed of which 129,116 (73.4%) were antimicrobial. A total of 83,965 (65%) antibiotics were prescribed to dogs, 40,477 (31.4%) to cats, and 4674 (3.6%) to other companion animals. In dogs, 90.5% of VEPs prescribed for systemic treatment included an antimicrobial Critically Important or Highly Important or Important for human medicine (WHO, 2018). The most widely prescribed class was fluoroquinolones. The antimicrobials prescribed were mainly metronidazole-spiramycin (29.7%), amoxicillin-clavulanic (19.6%), enrofloxacin and cephalexin in dogs (16.5%) and enrofloxacin (22.6%) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (21.4%) in cats. Based on the results, the widespread use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials and the use of molecules for which limitations should be observed according to the EMA guidelines has emerged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Foglia Manzillo
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy; (V.F.M.); (M.F.P.); (M.G.); (N.E.H.B.F.); (G.O.)
| | - Maria Francesca Peruzy
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy; (V.F.M.); (M.F.P.); (M.G.); (N.E.H.B.F.); (G.O.)
| | - Manuela Gizzarelli
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy; (V.F.M.); (M.F.P.); (M.G.); (N.E.H.B.F.); (G.O.)
| | - Berardino Izzo
- Veterinary Pharmacovigilance Center of Campania Region, 80137 Naples, Italy; (B.I.); (P.S.); (A.C.); (G.V.); (C.C.)
| | - Paolo Sarnelli
- Veterinary Pharmacovigilance Center of Campania Region, 80137 Naples, Italy; (B.I.); (P.S.); (A.C.); (G.V.); (C.C.)
| | - Antonio Carrella
- Veterinary Pharmacovigilance Center of Campania Region, 80137 Naples, Italy; (B.I.); (P.S.); (A.C.); (G.V.); (C.C.)
| | - Giuseppina Vinciguerra
- Veterinary Pharmacovigilance Center of Campania Region, 80137 Naples, Italy; (B.I.); (P.S.); (A.C.); (G.V.); (C.C.)
| | - Claudia Chirollo
- Veterinary Pharmacovigilance Center of Campania Region, 80137 Naples, Italy; (B.I.); (P.S.); (A.C.); (G.V.); (C.C.)
| | - Nour El Houda Ben Fayala
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy; (V.F.M.); (M.F.P.); (M.G.); (N.E.H.B.F.); (G.O.)
| | - Ines Balestrino
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy; (V.F.M.); (M.F.P.); (M.G.); (N.E.H.B.F.); (G.O.)
| | - Gaetano Oliva
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy; (V.F.M.); (M.F.P.); (M.G.); (N.E.H.B.F.); (G.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Redding LE, Reilly K, Radtke B, Bartholomew S, Cole SD. The potential role of veterinary technicians in promoting antimicrobial stewardship. BMC Vet Res 2023; 19:142. [PMID: 37660006 PMCID: PMC10474764 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-023-03637-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A core principle of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in veterinary settings is the need for engagement of all stakeholders; however, no studies have addressed the role of veterinary technicians in AMS specifically. The objective of this study was to qualitatively assess knowledge, opinions, and practices related to AMS among technicians. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 veterinary technicians with varied backgrounds, experience and roles. Interviews centered on participants work experience and interactions with their employer, perceptions of antimicrobial resistance and overuse in veterinary medicine, observed application of AMS principles, opinions on potential opportunities for technicians to contribute to AMS and concomitant potential barriers to these opportunities. Transcripts of interviews were coded thematically by two authors, then organized into a hierarchical framework, and the characterization of codes was compared across different categories of respondents. RESULTS Most veterinary technicians were knowledgeable about antimicrobial drugs but could not provide a complete definition of antimicrobial resistance or AMS. Most veterinary technicians could identify examples of antimicrobial misuse. Participants identified areas of client education and discussion with veterinarians as potential areas to contribute to AMS. Barriers identified included hierarchical structures of veterinary practices and time-constraints. Most participants expressed a personal interest in participating in AMS. CONCLUSIONS There is a possible appetite among some veterinary technicians to participate in AMS and they already play applicable roles in practices. Barriers such as educational needs, hierarchical structures of veterinary practices and time constraints will need to be addressed if technicians are included in AMS efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurel E Redding
- Department of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katherine Reilly
- Department of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Bridget Radtke
- Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stacy Bartholomew
- Department of Veterinary Technology, Manor College, Jenkintown, PA, USA
| | - Stephen D Cole
- Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Scarborough RO, Sri AE, Browning GF, Hardefeldt LY, Bailey KE. ‘Brave Enough’: A Qualitative Study of Veterinary Decisions to Withhold or Delay Antimicrobial Treatment in Pets. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:antibiotics12030540. [PMID: 36978407 PMCID: PMC10044613 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12030540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Veterinarians sometimes prescribe antimicrobials even when they know or suspect that they are unnecessary. The drivers of this behaviour must be understood to design effective antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 veterinarians who treated companion animals in Australia. The Theory of Planned Behaviour was used to organise interview themes, focusing on a decision to withhold antimicrobial therapy in the absence of a clear indication. Many background factors influenced antimicrobial-withholding decisions, including the veterinarian’s communication skills, general attitudes towards antimicrobial resistance (AMR), habits and energy levels. Client awareness of AMR and the veterinarian–client relationship were also important. Beliefs about the consequences of withholding antimicrobials (behavioural beliefs) were dominated by fears of the animal’s condition deteriorating and of failing to meet client expectations. These fears, weighed against the seemingly distant consequences of AMR, were major barriers to withholding antimicrobials. Normative beliefs were primarily focused on the expected approval (or disapproval) of the client and of other veterinarians. Control beliefs about the difficulty of withholding antimicrobials centred around client factors, most importantly, their capacity to adequately monitor their animal, to pay for further investigations, or to undertake non-antimicrobial management, such as wound care, at home. The use of antimicrobials by companion animal veterinarians in the absence of a clear indication is often powerfully driven by behavioural beliefs, chiefly, fears of clinical deterioration and of failing to meet client expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ri O. Scarborough
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Correspondence:
| | - Anna E. Sri
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Glenn F. Browning
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Laura Y. Hardefeldt
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Kirsten E. Bailey
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Taylor DD, Scallan Walter EJ. Colorado pet owners' perceptions of and attitudes towards antimicrobial drug use and resistance. Vet Rec 2023; 192:e2583. [PMID: 36692979 DOI: 10.1002/vetr.2583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial drug (AMD) use in companion animal medicine may contribute to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in both pets and humans. However, pet owners' attitudes and perceptions regarding AMD use and AMR have not been extensively studied in the United States. METHODS A cross-sectional survey at five Colorado veterinary hospitals collected information about pet owners' knowledge and perceptions of AMD use and AMR, adherence with AMD treatment instructions and the role of the veterinarian in the AMD prescribing process. RESULTS The pet owners surveyed did not have an adequate understanding of AMR and were unaware of the potential human health impact of AMD use in pets. However, most pet owners reported adherence with veterinary prescription instructions and indicated that they trusted their veterinarian to make appropriate decisions for their pets. LIMITATIONS The cross-sectional design focusing on Colorado pet owners limits the generalisability of the results. Selection and social desirability biases may have occurred, which could have affected who participated and how participants responded to statements. CONCLUSIONS Pet owners play an important role in the AMD prescription process, and their lack of AMR understanding should be addressed in antimicrobial stewardship plans. Further research on how to effectively incorporate pet owners into stewardship interventions is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel D Taylor
- Colorado School of Public Health, Colorado Integrated Food Safety Center of Excellence, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Elaine J Scallan Walter
- Colorado School of Public Health, Colorado Integrated Food Safety Center of Excellence, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kardomatea N, Hopman NEM, van Geijlswijk IM, Portengen L, Wagenaar JA, Heederik DJJ, Broens EM. Quantifying topical antimicrobial use before and during participation in an antimicrobial stewardship programme in Dutch companion animal clinics. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0283956. [PMID: 37053211 PMCID: PMC10101466 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The emergence of bacterial strains resistant to topical antimicrobials in both human and veterinary medicine has raised concerns over retaining the efficacy of these preparations. Yet, little information is available regarding the use of topical antimicrobials in either sector for planning targeted interventions. This study aims to quantify the use of topical antimicrobials in 44 Dutch companion animal clinics before and during their participation in an antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP), to explore the effect of the intervention on topical antimicrobial use (AMU). Hence, prescription and clinic animal population data, collected from July 2012 until June 2018 were used. Specifically, the period from July 2012 until June 2015 was defined as pre-intervention period, whereas clinics started to participate in the ASP from March 2016 onwards. As quantification metric, the Defined Daily Dose for Animals (DDDA) was used and a mixed effect times series model with auto-regression was applied to monthly topical AMU data. The intervention effect was modelled using a step function with a change in (linear) time trend and clinic characteristics, as potential determinants of topical AMU, were assessed using a multivariable regression model. A seasonal pattern was identified, in the pre-intervention period, where topical AMU was highest in July-August and lowest in February-March. In addition, total topical AMU appeared to significantly decrease over time in the pre-intervention period and the proportion of dogs in the clinic was positively associated with topical AMU. The intervention effect was significant only for second line and for skin product AMU. This study demonstrates that during participation in an ASP, second line and skin product AMU decreased in Dutch companion animal clinics. Additionally, this study demonstrates the existence of a seasonal effect and a decrease in topical AMU over time already before introduction of a targeted intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nafsika Kardomatea
- Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nonke E M Hopman
- Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ingeborg M van Geijlswijk
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lützen Portengen
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap A Wagenaar
- Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dick J J Heederik
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Els M Broens
- Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Walker B, Sánchez-Vizcaíno F, Barker EN. Effect of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention on the prescribing behaviours of companion animal veterinarians: A pre-post study. Vet Rec 2022; 190:e1485. [PMID: 35202485 DOI: 10.1002/vetr.1485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial stewardship is a cornerstone of efforts to combat antimicrobial resistance. We evaluated the impact of a formal discussion of antimicrobial stewardship for dogs and cats on systemic antimicrobial prescribing behaviours among companion animal veterinarians. METHODS Electronic health records including information about the prescription of antimicrobials were collected from a multisite UK veterinary practice between 2017 and 2020. We undertook interrupted time series analysis using a quasi-Poisson model to compare the pre- and postintervention change in level and slope for multiple outcomes. RESULTS After the intervention, there were sustained reductions in the prescription rate of cefovecin to cats and metronidazole to dogs and increases in amoxicillin-clavulanic acid prescribing. There was no evidence for an immediate change in overall prescribing rates in either species, although rates increased over the 12 months after the intervention. There was a transient increase in the proportion of dogs who had their weight recorded at the time of prescription. Results suggest decreases in the prescription of off-licence antimicrobials in both species and the likelihood of underdosing in dogs. CONCLUSIONS Discussion of antimicrobial stewardship is more likely to influence the antimicrobial choice than whether to prescribe or not. Interventions may benefit by focusing on appropriate antimicrobial selection rather than overall prescription frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Walker
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Emi N Barker
- Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, UK.,Langford Vets, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hardefeldt LY, Hur B, Richards S, Scarborough R, Browning GF, Billman-Jacobe H, Gilkerson JR, Ierardo J, Awad M, Chay R, Bailey KE. OUP accepted manuscript. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2022; 4:dlac015. [PMID: 35233530 PMCID: PMC8874133 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) have been widely implemented in medical practice to improve antimicrobial prescribing and reduce selection for multidrug-resistant pathogens. Objectives To implement different antimicrobial stewardship intervention packages in 135 veterinary practices and assess their impact on antimicrobial prescribing. Methods In October 2018, general veterinary clinics were assigned to one of three levels of ASP, education only (CON), intermediate (AMS1) or intensive (AMS2). De-identified prescribing data (1 October 2016 to 31 October 2020), sourced from VetCompass Australia, were analysed and a Poisson regression model fitted to identify the effect of the interventions on the incidence rates of antimicrobial prescribing. Results The overall incidence rate (IR) of antimicrobial prescribing for dogs and cats prior to the intervention was 3.7/100 consultations, which declined by 36% (2.4/100) in the implementation period, and by 50% (1.9/100) during the post-implementation period. Compared with CON, in AMS2 there was a 4% and 6% reduction in the overall IR of antimicrobial prescribing, and a 24% and 24% reduction in IR of high importance antimicrobial prescribing, attributable to the intervention in the implementation and post-implementation periods, respectively. A greater mean difference in the IR of antimicrobial prescribing was seen in high-prescribing clinics. Conclusions These AMS interventions had a positive impact in a large group of general veterinary practices, resulting in a decline in overall antimicrobial use and a shift towards use of antimicrobials rated as low importance, with the greatest impact in high-prescribing clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Y. Hardefeldt
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute, Grattan St, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- Corresponding author. E-mail:
| | - B. Hur
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- School of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - S. Richards
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute, Grattan St, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - R. Scarborough
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute, Grattan St, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - G. F. Browning
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute, Grattan St, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - H. Billman-Jacobe
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute, Grattan St, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - J. R. Gilkerson
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute, Grattan St, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - J. Ierardo
- Greencross Vets Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - M. Awad
- Greencross Vets Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - R. Chay
- Greencross Vets Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - K. E. Bailey
- Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute, Grattan St, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tompson AC, Mateus ALP, Brodbelt DC, Chandler CIR. Understanding Antibiotic Use in Companion Animals: A Literature Review Identifying Avenues for Future Efforts. Front Vet Sci 2021; 8:719547. [PMID: 34692805 PMCID: PMC8531418 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.719547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Addressing antibiotic use is essential to tackle antimicrobial resistance, a major human and animal health challenge. This review seeks to inform stewardship efforts in companion animals by collating research insights regarding antibiotic use in this group and identifying overlooked avenues for future research and stewardship efforts. The development of population-based methods has established that antibiotics are frequently used in companion animal care. Research insights are also contributing toward an in-depth comprehension of the contexts to antibiotic use. Qualitative approaches, for example, have enabled a nuanced understanding in four key areas: interactions with owners, clinical and financial risk management, time pressures, and clinic dynamics. This review identifies that much of the existing research frames antibiotic use as the result of choices made by the individuals at the interface of their use. Future research and policy endeavours could look beyond the moment of prescribing to consider the societal structures and networks in which companion animal antibiotic use is entangled. A diversification in research approaches and frameworks through which antibiotic use is understood will facilitate the identification of additional targets for stewardship initiatives beyond providing information and awareness campaigns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice C Tompson
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ana L P Mateus
- VEEPH Group, Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dave C Brodbelt
- VEEPH Group, Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cook S, Greensmith T, Humm K. Successful management of aspiration pneumopathy without antimicrobial agents: 14 dogs (2014-2021). J Small Anim Pract 2021; 62:1108-1113. [PMID: 34423436 DOI: 10.1111/jsap.13409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe clinical cases of aspiration pneumonitis and pneumonia in dogs, which were successfully managed without antimicrobials. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective case review of dogs presenting to a referral teaching hospital between February 2014 and February 2021. Cases were included when a clinical diagnosis of aspiration pneumopathy was made (requiring one or more of the following: radiographic evidence of an aspiration pneumopathy, endotracheal airway sampling consistent with aspiration and/or a positive endotracheal airway sample culture) which was not treated with antimicrobial therapy. RESULTS Fourteen cases were identified of which nine had respiratory signs including increased respiratory rate or effort (n=8), arterial hypoxaemia (n=2), or a clinician-determined requirement for oxygen therapy (n=4). Where haematology was performed, five of nine displayed a normal neutrophil count with toxic changes, three displayed neutrophilia and one displayed neutropenia with toxic changes. Endotracheal airway sample cytology in four cases revealed neutrophilic inflammation with bacteria, plant material, yeasts and unidentified foreign material. Where respiratory signs were present, these resolved within 12 to 36 hours. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE In this case series, immunocompetent dogs sustaining aspiration events, even with classical evidence of pneumonitis or pneumonia, have been managed successfully without antimicrobials. Radiography alone cannot be used to determine the requirement for antimicrobials. Better characterisation of the pathogenesis and clinical trajectory of aspiration pneumopathy is required, which may enable a reduction in inappropriate antimicrobial prescriptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Cook
- Queen Mother Hospital for Animals, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, AL9 7TA, UK
| | - T Greensmith
- Queen Mother Hospital for Animals, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, AL9 7TA, UK
| | - K Humm
- Queen Mother Hospital for Animals, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, AL9 7TA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Isgren CM. Improving clinical outcomes via responsible antimicrobial use in horses. EQUINE VET EDUC 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/eve.13502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C. M. Isgren
- Department of Equine Clinical Science Faculty of Health & Life Sciences Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences University of Liverpool Leahurst UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hopman NEM, Wagenaar JA, van Geijlswijk IM, Broens EM. Development and Pilot of an Interactive Online Course on Antimicrobial Stewardship in Companion Animals. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 10:antibiotics10050610. [PMID: 34065607 PMCID: PMC8161360 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10050610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
A holistic approach to antimicrobial use (AMU) and prescribing is needed to combat the problem of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Previously, an antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) was developed, introduced, and evaluated in 44 Dutch companion animal clinics, which resulted in an optimization of AMU. As a follow-up to this, an online course was developed to promote awareness of AMU, AMR, and responsible antimicrobial prescribing. The aim of this paper is to describe the development and pilot, including evaluation, of this course, which will be disseminated more widely among Dutch companion animal veterinarians. The interactive programme consists of a major e-learning component and two online, face-to-face meetings. The course comprises five different parts corresponding with five consecutive weeks. Theory on several topics is offered, for example on AMU and AMR in general, Dutch regulations and guidelines on veterinary AMU, behavioural change, and possible methods to quantify AMU. Additionally, several assignments are offered, for example to reflect upon one’s own current antimicrobial prescribing behaviour. Interactive discussion and peer-to-peer learning are promoted. Since September 2020, the course has been offered in a pilot phase, and the feedback is promising. Evaluation of the pilot phase will result in recommendations for further optimization and dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nonke E. M. Hopman
- Department Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Yalelaan 1, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.W.); (E.M.B.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Jaap A. Wagenaar
- Department Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Yalelaan 1, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.W.); (E.M.B.)
- Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA Lelystad, The Netherlands
| | - Ingeborg M. van Geijlswijk
- IRAS Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics Group, Department Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 106, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Els M. Broens
- Department Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Yalelaan 1, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.W.); (E.M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Breaking new ground in antimicrobial stewardship in companion animal veterinary practice. Nat Commun 2021; 12:2445. [PMID: 33907195 PMCID: PMC8079427 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22542-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Singleton and colleagues publish in Nature Communications an intervention study to reduce antimicrobial usage in companion animal practice. They identify significant reductions in antimicrobial usage with their more active intervention group over approximately a 6-month period. The study offers an exciting way forward to explore further the trial interventions and assess alternative methods to improve antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary practice.
Collapse
|