Leukemia stemness and co-occurring mutations drive resistance to IDH inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia

FLT3 targeting in the modern era: from clonal selection to combination therapies

Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) is the most frequently mutated gene in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Modern targeting of FLT3 with inhibitors has improved clinical outcomes and FLT3 inhibitors have been incorporated into the treatment of AML in all phases of the disease, including the upfront, relapsed/refractory and maintenance settings. This review will discuss the current understanding of FLT3 biology, the clinical use of FLT3 inhibitors, resistance mechanisms and emerging combination treatment strategies.

Precision medicine in AML: overcoming resistance

The development of molecularly targeted therapy for acute myeloid leukemia is progressing at an accelerated pace. Therapies targeting FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, and BCL2 have been approved in the last 5 years. As we exploit these biological vulnerabilities, various mechanisms of resistance arise. Emergence of competing clones with different genetic drivers and acquisition of constitutional mutations in the target renders therapies ineffective, and enzymatic isoform changes can lead to reappearance of the disease phenotype. Understanding the timing and circumstances of resistance origination will allow clinicians to develop combinatorial and sequential therapeutic approaches to deepen responses and improve survival. The objective of this review is to illustrate the biological underpinnings of each therapy and the landscape of resistance mechanisms and discuss strategies to overcome on- and off-target resistance.

Evolving therapeutic landscape of advanced biliary tract cancer: from chemotherapy to molecular targets

Biliary tract cancer, the second most common type of liver cancer, remains a therapeutic challenge due to its late diagnosis and poor prognosis. In recent years, it has become evident that classical chemotherapy might not be the optimal treatment for patients with biliary tract cancer, especially after failure of first-line therapy. Finding new treatment options and strategies to improve the survival of these patients is therefore crucial. With the rise and increasing availability of genetic testing in patients with tumor, novel treatment approaches targeting specific genetic alterations have recently been proposed and have demonstrated their safety and efficacy in numerous clinical trials. In this review, we will first consider chemotherapy options and the new possibility of combining chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in first-line treatment. We will then provide an overview of genomic alterations and their potential for targeted therapy especially in second-line therapy. In addition to the most common alterations such as isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH1/2) mutations, fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusions, and alterations, we will also discuss less frequently encountered alterations such as BRAF V600E mutation and neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor gene (NTRK) fusion. We highlight the importance of molecular profiling in guiding therapeutic decisions and emphasize the need for continued research to optimize and expand targeted treatment strategies for this aggressive malignancy.

PTPN11 Mutation Clonal Hierarchy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Mutations in protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 11 ( PTPN11 ) have been considered late acquired mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) development. To interrogate the ontogeny of PTPN11 mutations, we utilized single-cell DNA sequencing and identified that PTPN11 mutations can occur as initiating events in some AML patients when accompanied by strong oncogenic drivers, commonly NPM1 mutations. The co-driver role of PTPN11 mutations was confirmed in a novel murine model that exhibits an AML phenotype with early expansion of a diverse set of variably differentiated myeloid cells that engrafted into immunodeficient and immunocompetent mice. This immune diversity was reconstituted from early precursor cells when engrafted into immunodeficient mice. Moreover, immune diversity was also observed in the blast component of patient samples with NPM1 and PTPN11 mutations, providing novel antigen targets for immune based approaches in this subset of AML that is resistant to multiple targeted therapies.

Recent advancements in biomarkers, therapeutics, and associated challenges in acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a common type of leukemia that has a high mortality rate. The reasons for high mortality in patients with AML are therapeutic resistance, limited ability to predict duration of response, and likelihood of cancer relapse. Biomarkers, such as leukemic stem cell biomarkers, circulatory biomarkers, measurable residual disease biomarkers, and molecular biomarkers, are used for prognosis, diagnosis, and targeted killing to selectively eliminate AML cells. They also play an indispensable role in providing therapeutic resistance to patients with AML. Therefore, targeting these biomarkers will improve the outcome of AML patients. However, identifying biomarkers that can differentiate between treatment-responsive and non-responsive AML patients remains a challenge. This review discusses recent advancements in AML biomarkers, promising therapeutics, and associated challenges in the treatment of AML.

The clinical implications of BCOR mutations in a large cohort of acute myeloid leukemia patients: a 5-year single-center retrospective study

To elucidate the effect of BCOR mutation (BCORmut) on clinical outcomes, we included a total of 899 consecutive AML patients in a single-center during July 2016 to December 2021. Fifty cases (5.6%) had BCOR mutations, which co-occurred with mutations of RUNX1, DNMT3A, IDH2, BCORL1, STAG2, SF3B1 and U2AF1, but were exclusive with KIT and CEBPA mutations. BCORmut was also found to be exclusive with t(8;21)(q22;q22.1) AML in all patients and MLL rearrangements in the European Leukemia Net (ELN) adverse group. In those receiving intensive chemotherapy regimens, BCORmut was associated with lower complete remission (CR) rates and worse prognosis. Subgroup analysis showed that BCORmut mainly conferred a poor prognosis in the intermediate and adverse groups of the ELN2017 risk. These results suggest that BCOR mutation is an independent prognostic parameter in AML, implying BCOR mutation as a novel marker for chemorefractory disease and inferior prognosis.

Clinical Implications of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutations and Targeted Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Mutant Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors-Recent Advances, Challenges and Future Prospects

Despite the better understanding of the molecular mechanisms contributing to the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and improved patient survival in recent years, AML therapy still remains a clinical challenge. For this reason, it is important to search for new therapies that will enable the achievement of remission. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration approved three mutant IDH (mIDH) inhibitors for the treatment of AML. However, the use of mIDH inhibitors in monotherapy usually leads to the development of resistance and the subsequent recurrence of the cancer, despite the initial effectiveness of the therapy. A complete understanding of the mechanisms by which IDH mutations influence the development of leukemia, as well as the processes that enable resistance to mIDH inhibitors, may significantly improve the efficacy of this therapy through the use of an appropriate synergistic approach. The aim of this literature review is to present the role of IDH1/IDH2 mutations in the pathogenesis of AML and the results of clinical trials using mIDH1/IDH2 inhibitors in AML and to discuss the challenges related to the use of mIDH1/IDH2 inhibitors in practice and future prospects related to the potential methods of overcoming resistance to these agents.

Combination therapy with novel agents for acute myeloid leukaemia: Insights into treatment of a heterogenous disease

The treatment landscape of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is evolving rapidly. Venetoclax in combination with intensive chemotherapy or doublets or triplets with targeted or immune therapies is the focus of numerous ongoing trials. The development of mutation-targeted therapies has greatly enhanced the treatment armamentarium, with FLT3 inhibitors and isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors improving outcomes in frontline and relapsed/refractory (RR) AML, and menin inhibitors showing efficacy in RR NPM1mut and KMT2A-rearranged AML. With so many new drugs approved, the number of potential combinatorial approaches to leverage the maximal benefit of these agents has increased dramatically, while at the same time introducing clinical challenges, such as key preclinical and clinical data supporting the development of combinatorial therapy, how to optimally combine or sequence these novel agents, how to optimise dose and duration to maintain safety while enhancing efficacy, the optimal duration of therapy and the role of measurable residual disease in decision-making in both intensive and low-intensity therapy settings. In this review, we will outline the evidence leading to the approval of key agents in AML, their on-label current approvals and how they may be optimally combined in a safe and deliverable fashion to further improve outcomes in AML.

Mutation Patterns Predict Drug Sensitivity in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

PURPOSE

The inherent genetic heterogeneity of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has challenged the development of precise and effective therapies. The objective of this study was to elucidate the genomic basis of drug resistance or sensitivity, identify signatures for drug response prediction, and provide resources to the research community.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We performed targeted sequencing, high-throughput drug screening, and single-cell genomic profiling on leukemia cell samples derived from patients with AML. Statistical approaches and machine learning models were applied to identify signatures for drug response prediction. We also integrated large public datasets to understand the co-occurring mutation patterns and further investigated the mutation profiles in the single cells. The features revealed in the co-occurring or mutual exclusivity pattern were further subjected to machine learning models.

RESULTS

We detected genetic signatures associated with sensitivity or resistance to specific agents, and identified five co-occurring mutation groups. The application of single-cell genomic sequencing unveiled the co-occurrence of variants at the individual cell level, highlighting the presence of distinct subclones within patients with AML. Using the mutation pattern for drug response prediction demonstrates high accuracy in predicting sensitivity to some drug classes, such as MEK inhibitors for RAS-mutated leukemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the importance of considering the gene mutation patterns for the prediction of drug response in AML. It provides a framework for categorizing patients with AML by mutations that enable drug sensitivity prediction.

Discovery of Novel Dual Inhibitors Targeting Mutant IDH1 and NAMPT for the Treatment of Glioma with IDH1Mutation

The targeting of cancer cell intrinsic metabolism has emerged as a promising strategy for antitumor intervention. In the study, we identified the first-in-class small molecules that effectively inhibit both mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1) and nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT), two crucial targets in cancer metabolism, through structure-based drug design. Notably, compound 23h exhibits excellent and balanced inhibitory activities against both mIDH1 (IC50 = 14.93 nM) and NAMPT (IC50 = 12.56 nM), leading to significant suppression of IDH1-mutated glioma cell (U87 MG-IDH1R132H) proliferation. Significantly, compound 23h has the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier (B/P ratio, 0.76) and demonstrates remarkable in vivo antitumor efficacy (20 mg/kg) in the U87 MG-IDH1R132H orthotopic transplantation mouse models without any notable toxicity. This proof-of-concept investigation substantiates the viability of discovering small molecules that concurrently target mIDH1 and NAMPT, providing valuable leads for the treatment of glioma and an efficient approach for the discovery of multitarget antitumor drugs.

Venetoclax and Cobimetinib in Relapsed/Refractory AML: A Phase 1b Trial

BACKGROUND

Therapies for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia remain limited and outcomes poor, especially amongst patients who are ineligible for cytotoxic chemotherapy or targeted therapies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase 1b trial evaluated venetoclax, a B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitor, plus cobimetinib, a MEK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia, ineligible for cytotoxic chemotherapy. Two-dimensional dose-escalation was performed for venetoclax dosed daily, and for cobimetinib dosed on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (median [range] age: 71.5 years [60-84]) received venetoclax-cobimetinib. The most common adverse events (AEs; in ≥40.0% of patients) were diarrhea (80.0%), nausea (60.0%), vomiting (40.0%), febrile neutropenia (40.0%), and fatigue (40.0%). Overall, 66.7% and 23.3% of patients experienced AEs leading to dose modification/interruption or treatment withdrawal, respectively. The composite complete remission (CRc) rate (complete remission [CR] + CR with incomplete blood count recovery + CR with incomplete platelet recovery) was 15.6%; antileukemic response rate (CRc + morphologic leukemia-free state/partial remission) was 18.8%. For the recommended phase 2 dose (venetoclax: 600 mg; cobimetinib: 40 mg), CRc and antileukemic response rates were both 12.5%. Failure to achieve an antileukemic response was associated with elevated baseline phosphorylated ERK and MCL-1 levels, but not BCL-xL. Baseline mutations in ≥1 signaling gene or TP53 were noted in nonresponders and emerged on treatment. Pharmacodynamic biomarkers revealed inconsistent, transient inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway.

CONCLUSION

Venetoclax-cobimetinib showed limited preliminary efficacy similar to single-agent venetoclax, but with added toxicity. Our findings will inform future trials of BCL-2/MAPK pathway inhibitor combinations.

RAS mutations in myeloid malignancies: revisiting old questions with novel insights and therapeutic perspectives

NRAS and KRAS activating point mutations are present in 10-30% of myeloid malignancies and are often associated with a proliferative phenotype. RAS mutations harbor allele-specific structural and biochemical properties depending on the hotspot mutation, contributing to variable biological consequences. Given their subclonal nature in most myeloid malignancies, their clonal architecture, and patterns of cooperativity with other driver genetic alterations may potentially have a direct, causal influence on the prognosis and treatment of myeloid malignancies. RAS mutations overall tend to be associated with poor clinical outcome in both chronic and acute myeloid malignancies. Several recent prognostic scoring systems have incorporated RAS mutational status. While RAS mutations do not always act as independent prognostic factors, they significantly influence disease progression and survival. However, their clinical significance depends on the type of mutation, disease context, and treatment administered. Recent evidence also indicates that RAS mutations drive resistance to targeted therapies, particularly FLT3, IDH1/2, or JAK2 inhibitors, as well as the venetoclax-azacitidine combination. The investigation of novel therapeutic strategies and combinations that target multiple axes within the RAS pathway, encompassing both upstream and downstream components, is an active field of research. The success of direct RAS inhibitors in patients with solid tumors has brought renewed optimism that this progress will be translated to patients with hematologic malignancies. In this review, we highlight key insights on RAS mutations across myeloid malignancies from the past decade, including their prevalence and distribution, cooperative genetic events, clonal architecture and dynamics, prognostic implications, and therapeutic targeting.

A personalized medicine approach identifies enasidenib as an efficient treatment for IDH2 mutant chondrosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Sarcomas represent an extensive group of malignant diseases affecting mesodermal tissues. Among sarcomas, the clinical management of chondrosarcomas remains a complex challenge, as high-grade tumours do not respond to current therapies. Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and 2 genes are among the most common mutations detected in chondrosarcomas and may represent a therapeutic opportunity. The presence of mutated IDH (mIDH) enzymes results in the accumulation of the oncometabolite 2-HG leading to molecular alterations that contribute to drive tumour growth.

METHODS

We developed a personalized medicine strategy based on the targeted NGS/Sanger sequencing of sarcoma samples (n = 6) and the use of matched patient-derived cell lines as a drug-testing platform. The anti-tumour potential of IDH mutations found in two chondrosarcoma cases was analysed in vitro, in vivo and molecularly (transcriptomic and DNA methylation analyses).

FINDINGS

We treated several chondrosarcoma models with specific mIDH1/2 inhibitors. Among these treatments, only the mIDH2 inhibitor enasidenib was able to decrease 2-HG levels and efficiently reduce the viability of mIDH2 chondrosarcoma cells. Importantly, oral administration of enasidenib in xenografted mice resulted in a complete abrogation of tumour growth. Enasidenib induced a profound remodelling of the transcriptomic landscape not associated to changes in the 5 mC methylation levels and its anti-tumour effects were associated with the repression of proliferative pathways such as those controlled by E2F factors.

INTERPRETATION

Overall, this work provides preclinical evidence for the use of enasidenib to treat mIDH2 chondrosarcomas.

FUNDING

Supported by the Spanish Research Agency/FEDER (grants PID2022-142020OB-I00; PID2019-106666RB-I00), the ISC III/FEDER (PI20CIII/00020; DTS18CIII/00005; CB16/12/00390; CB06/07/1009; CB19/07/00057); the GEIS group (GEIS-62); and the PCTI (Asturias)/FEDER (IDI/2021/000027).

Innovations in conditioning and post-transplant maintenance in AML: genomically informed revelations on the graft-versus-leukemia effect

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is the prototype of cancer genomics as it was the first published cancer genome. Large-scale next generation/massively parallel sequencing efforts have identified recurrent alterations that inform prognosis and have guided the development of targeted therapies. Despite changes in the frontline and relapsed standard of care stemming from the success of small molecules targeting FLT3, IDH1/2, and apoptotic pathways, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) and the resulting graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect remains the only curative path for most patients. Advances in conditioning regimens, graft-vs-host disease prophylaxis, anti-infective agents, and supportive care have made this modality feasible, reducing transplant related mortality even among patients with advanced age or medical comorbidities. As such, relapse has emerged now as the most common cause of transplant failure. Relapse may occur after alloHSCT because residual disease clones persist after transplant, and develop immune escape from GVL, or such clones may proliferate rapidly early after alloHSCT, and outpace donor immune reconstitution, leading to relapse before any GVL effect could set in. To address this issue, genomically informed therapies are increasingly being incorporated into pre-transplant conditioning, or as post-transplant maintenance or pre-emptive therapy in the setting of mixed/falling donor chimerism or persistent detectable measurable residual disease (MRD). There is an urgent need to better understand how these emerging therapies modulate the two sides of the GVHD vs. GVL coin: 1) how molecularly or immunologically targeted therapies affect engraftment, GVHD potential, and function of the donor graft and 2) how these therapies affect the immunogenicity and sensitivity of leukemic clones to the GVL effect. By maximizing the synergistic action of molecularly targeted agents, immunomodulating agents, conventional chemotherapy, and the GVL effect, there is hope for improving outcomes for patients with this often-devastating disease.

Therapeutic biomarkers in acute myeloid leukemia: functional and genomic approaches

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is clinically and genetically a heterogeneous disease characterized by clonal expansion of abnormal hematopoietic progenitors. Genomic approaches to precision medicine have been implemented to direct targeted therapy for subgroups of AML patients, for instance, IDH inhibitors for IDH1/2 mutated patients, and FLT3 inhibitors with FLT3 mutated patients. While next generation sequencing for genetic mutations has improved treatment outcomes, only a fraction of AML patients benefit due to the low prevalence of actionable targets. In recent years, the adoption of newer functional technologies for quantitative phenotypic analysis and patient-derived avatar models has strengthened the potential for generalized functional precision medicine approach. However, functional approach requires robust standardization for multiple variables such as functional parameters, time of drug exposure and drug concentration for making in vitro predictions. In this review, we first summarize genomic and functional therapeutic biomarkers adopted for AML therapy, followed by challenges associated with these approaches, and finally, the future strategies to enhance the implementation of precision medicine.

A study to assess the efficacy of enasidenib and risk-adapted addition of azacitidine in newly diagnosed IDH2-mutant AML

ABSTRACT

Enasidenib (ENA) is an inhibitor of isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) approved for the treatment of patients with IDH2-mutant relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this phase 2/1b Beat AML substudy, we applied a risk-adapted approach to assess the efficacy of ENA monotherapy for patients aged ≥60 years with newly diagnosed IDH2-mutant AML in whom genomic profiling demonstrated that mutant IDH2 was in the dominant leukemic clone. Patients for whom ENA monotherapy did not induce a complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) enrolled in a phase 1b cohort with the addition of azacitidine. The phase 2 portion assessing the overall response to ENA alone demonstrated efficacy, with a composite complete response (cCR) rate (CR/CRi) of 46% in 60 evaluable patients. Seventeen patients subsequently transitioned to phase 1b combination therapy, with a cCR rate of 41% and 1 dose-limiting toxicity. Correlative studies highlight mechanisms of clonal elimination with differentiation therapy as well as therapeutic resistance. This study demonstrates both efficacy of ENA monotherapy in the upfront setting and feasibility and applicability of a risk-adapted approach to the upfront treatment of IDH2-mutant AML. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03013998.

Aberrant HIF1- α and SIX-1 Expression is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 Mutations

BACKGROUND

IDH1 mutations are common in many cancers, however, their role in promoting the Warburg effect remains elusive. This study elucidates the putative involvement of mutant-IDH1 in regulating hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF1-α) and Sine-Oculis Homeobox-1 (SIX-1) expression.

METHODOLOGY

Genetic screening was performed using the ARMS-PCR in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), brain, and breast cancer (BC) cohorts, while transcript expression was determined using qPCR. Further, a meta-analysis of risk factors associated with the R132 mutation was performed.

RESULTS

Approximately 32% of AML and ∼60% of glioma cases were mutants, while no mutation was found in the BC cohort. 'AA' and TT' were associated with higher disease risk (OR = 12.18 & 4.68) in AML and had significantly upregulated IDH1 expression. Moreover, downregulated HIF1-α and upregulated SIX-1 expression was also observed in these patients, suggesting that mutant-IDH1 may alter glucose metabolism. Perturbed IDH1 and HIF-α levels exhibited poor prognosis in univariate and multivariate analysis, while age and gender were found to be contributory factors as well. Based on the ROC model, these had a good potential to be used as prognostic markers. A significant variation in frequencies of R132 mutations in AML among different populations was observed. Cytogenesis (R2 = 12.2%), NMP1 mutation status (R2 = 18.5%), and ethnic contributions (R2 = 73.21%) were critical moderators underlying these mutations. Women had a higher risk of R132 mutation (HR = 1.3, P < 0.04). The pooled prevalence was calculated to be 0.29 (95% CI 0.26-0.33, P < 0.01), indicating that IDH1 mutations are a significant prognostic factor in AML.

CONCLUSION

IDH1 and HIF1-α profiles are linked to poor survival and prognosis, while high SIX-1 expression in IDH1 mutants suggests a role in leukemic transformation and therapy response in AML.

Molecular predictors of response and survival following IDH1/2 inhibitor monotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia

Not available.

Phospholipid metabolic adaptation promotes survival of IDH2 mutant acute myeloid leukemia cells

Genetic mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) gene that result in a pathological enzymatic activity to produce oncometabolite have been detected in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. While specific inhibitors that target mutant IDH enzymes and normalize intracellular oncometabolite level have been developed, refractoriness and resistance has been reported. Since acquisition of pathological enzymatic activity is accompanied by the abrogation of the crucial WT IDH enzymatic activity in IDH mutant cells, aberrant metabolism in IDH mutant cells can potentially persist even after the normalization of intracellular oncometabolite level. Comparisons of isogenic AML cell lines with and without IDH2 gene mutations revealed two mutually exclusive signalings for growth advantage of IDH2 mutant cells, STAT phosphorylation associated with intracellular oncometabolite level and phospholipid metabolic adaptation. The latter came to light after the oncometabolite normalization and increased the resistance of IDH2 mutant cells to arachidonic acid-mediated apoptosis. The release of this metabolic adaptation by FDA-approved anti-inflammatory drugs targeting the metabolism of arachidonic acid could sensitize IDH2 mutant cells to apoptosis, resulting in their eradication in vitro and in vivo. Our findings will contribute to the development of alternative therapeutic options for IDH2 mutant AML patients who do not tolerate currently available therapies.

IDH2 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia

Advances in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) over the last 40 years have been limited. With an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease, the advent of new treatment options has enriched the armamentarium of the physician to combat the disease. Mutations of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDHs) genes are common in AML and occur in 20-30% of cases. These mutations lead to DNA hypermethylation, aberrant gene expression, cell proliferation, and abnormal differentiation. Targeting mutant IDH, either as monotherapy or in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or BCL-2 inhibitors, has opened new avenues of therapy for these patients.This review will outline the function of IDHs and focus on the biological effects of IDH2 mutations in AML, their prognosis and treatment options.

Mechanisms of Resistance to Small Molecules in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

In recent years, great progress has been made in the therapy of AML by targeting cellular processes associated with specific molecular features of the disease. Various small molecules inhibiting FLT3, IDH1/IDH2, and BCL2 have already gained approval from the respective authorities and are essential parts of personalized therapeutic regimens in modern therapy of AML. Unfortunately, primary and secondary resistance to these inhibitors is a frequent problem. Here, we comprehensively review the current state of knowledge regarding molecular processes involved in primary and secondary resistance to these agents, covering both genetic and nongenetic mechanisms. In addition, we introduce concepts and strategies for how these resistance mechanisms might be overcome.

Ivosidenib in acute myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Traditional treatment strategies for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have primarily relied on standard chemotherapy regimens for four decades. Indeed, the landscape of AML therapy has evolved substantially in recent years, mainly due to the introduction of hypomethylating agents and small molecules.Bcl2 inhibitor venetoclax, Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors such as midostaurin and gilteritinib, and isocitrate dehydrogenases 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) inhibitors ivosidenib and enasidenib, as well as hedgehog (HH) pathway inhibitor glasdegib represented a significant step forward in AML therapeutic armamentarium. Smoothened (SMO) inhibitor in combination with low-dose cytarabine marks a recent milestone.

AREAS COVERED

Ivosidenib, the first-in-class, selective, allosteric IDH1R132 inhibitor, showed the capability to induce in vitro differentiation of primary mIDH1 AML blasts. Clinical data highlighted its exceptional safety profile, as a standalone therapy and in combination strategy. Additionally, comprehensive studies consistently demonstrated its effectiveness, both in monotherapy and in association with chemotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

The identified ivosidenib's strengths, including its remarkable safety record and ability to yield positive therapeutic outcomes, position it as an ideal partner for both classic chemotherapy and biological treatments, i.e. hypometilant agents and/or venetoclax. Further studies are warranted to explore strategies for overcoming the occurrence of ivosidenib resistance.

Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 Mutation and Ivosidenib in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comprehensive Review

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) arises from immature myeloid progenitors, resulting in a stem-cell-like proliferative state. This leads to excessive pools of immature cells that cannot function, which usually happens at the cost of the production of mature functional cells, leading to deleterious consequences. The management of AML has intensified as newer targeted therapies have come into existence owing to deeper genetic analysis of the disease and patients. Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) is a cytosolic enzyme that is a part of the Krebs cycle and is extremely important in maintaining the homeostasis of the cell. It is produced by two different genes: IDH1 and IDH2. Ivosidenib has been associated with IDH1 inhibition and has been studied in numerous cancers. This review highlights the studies that have dealt with ivosidenib, an IDH1 inhibitor, in AML, the side effect profile, and the possible future course of the drug. After a scoping review of the available literature, we have identified that studies have consistently shown positive outcomes and that ivosidenib is a promising avenue for the management of AML. But it also has to be kept in mind that resistance to IDH inhibitors is on the rise, and the need to identify ways to circumvent this is to be addressed.

Perturbed epigenetic transcriptional regulation in AML with IDH mutations causes increased susceptibility to NK cells

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are found in 20% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. However, only 30-40% of the patients respond to IDH inhibitors (IDHi). We aimed to identify a molecular vulnerability to tailor novel therapies for AML patients with IDH mutations. We characterized the transcriptional and epigenetic landscape with the IDH2i AG-221, using an IDH2 mutated AML cell line model and AML patient cohorts, and discovered a perturbed transcriptional regulatory network involving myeloid transcription factors that were partly restored after AG-221 treatment. In addition, hypermethylation of the HLA cluster caused a down-regulation of HLA class I genes, triggering an enhanced natural killer (NK) cell activation and an increased susceptibility to NK cell-mediated responses. Finally, analyses of DNA methylation data from IDHi-treated patients showed that non-responders still harbored hypermethylation in HLA class I genes. In conclusion, this study provides new insights suggesting that IDH mutated AML is particularly sensitive to NK cell-based personalized immunotherapy.

The curious case of IDH mutant acute myeloid leukaemia: biochemistry and therapeutic approaches

Of the many genetic alterations that occur in cancer, relatively few have proven to be suitable for the development of targeted therapies. Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and -2 increase the capacity of cancer cells to produce a normally scarce metabolite, D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), by several orders of magnitude. The discovery of the unusual biochemistry of IDH mutations spurred a flurry of activity that revealed 2-HG as an 'oncometabolite' with pleiotropic effects in malignant cells and consequences for anti-tumour immunity. Over the next decade, we learned that 2-HG dysregulates a wide array of molecular pathways, among them a large family of dioxygenases that utilise the closely related metabolite α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) as an essential co-substrate. 2-HG not only contributes to malignant transformation, but some cancer cells become addicted to it and sensitive to inhibitors that block its synthesis. Moreover, high 2-HG levels and loss of wild-type IDH1 or IDH2 activity gives rise to synthetic lethal vulnerabilities. Herein, we review the biology of IDH mutations with a particular focus on acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), an aggressive disease where selective targeting of IDH-mutant cells is showing significant promise.

Targeting metabolic vulnerabilities to overcome resistance to therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

Malignant hematopoietic cells gain metabolic plasticity, reorganize anabolic mechanisms to improve anabolic output and prevent oxidative damage, and bypass cell cycle checkpoints, eventually outcompeting normal hematopoietic cells. Current therapeutic strategies of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are based on prognostic stratification that includes mutation profile as the closest surrogate to disease biology. Clinical efficacy of targeted therapies, e.g., agents targeting mutant FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2, are mostly limited to the presence of relevant mutations. Recent studies have not only demonstrated that specific mutations in AML create metabolic vulnerabilities but also highlighted the efficacy of targeting metabolic vulnerabilities in combination with inhibitors of these mutations. Therefore, delineating the functional relationships between genetic stratification, metabolic dependencies, and response to specific inhibitors of these vulnerabilities is crucial for identifying more effective therapeutic regimens, understanding resistance mechanisms, and identifying early response markers, ultimately improving the likelihood of cure. In addition, metabolic changes occurring in the tumor microenvironment have also been reported as therapeutic targets. The metabolic profiles of leukemia stem cells (LSCs) differ, and relapsed/refractory LSCs switch to alternative metabolic pathways, fueling oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), rendering them therapeutically resistant. In this review, we discuss the role of cancer metabolic pathways that contribute to the metabolic plasticity of AML and confer resistance to standard therapy; we also highlight the latest promising developments in the field in translating these important findings to the clinic and discuss the tumor microenvironment that supports metabolic plasticity and interplay with AML cells.

A Phase Ib/II Study of Ivosidenib with Venetoclax ± Azacitidine in IDH1-Mutated Myeloid Malignancies

The safety and efficacy of combining the isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) inhibitor ivosidenib (IVO) with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN; IVO + VEN) ± azacitidine (AZA; IVO + VEN + AZA) were evaluated in four cohorts of patients with IDH1-mutated myeloid malignancies (n = 31). Most (91%) adverse events were grade 1 or 2. The maximal tolerated dose was not reached. Composite complete remission with IVO + VEN + AZA versus IVO + VEN was 90% versus 83%. Among measurable residual disease (MRD)-evaluable patients (N = 16), 63% attained MRD--negative remissions; IDH1 mutation clearance occurred in 64% of patients receiving ≥5 treatment cycles (N = 14). Median event-free survival and overall survival were 36 [94% CI, 23-not reached (NR)] and 42 (95% CI, 42-NR) months. Patients with signaling gene mutations appeared to particularly benefit from the triplet regimen. Longitudinal single-cell proteogenomic analyses linked cooccurring mutations, antiapoptotic protein expression, and cell maturation to therapeutic sensitivity of IDH1-mutated clones. No IDH isoform switching or second-site IDH1 mutations were observed, indicating combination therapy may overcome established resistance pathways to single-agent IVO.

SIGNIFICANCE

IVO + VEN + AZA is safe and active in patients with IDH1-mutated myeloid malignancies. Combination therapy appears to overcome resistance mechanisms observed with single-agent IDH-inhibitor use, with high MRD-negative remission rates. Single-cell DNA ± protein and time-of-flight mass-cytometry analysis revealed complex resistance mechanisms at relapse, highlighting key pathways for future therapeutic intervention. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 247.

Update on Small Molecule Targeted Therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

OPINION STATEMENT

The search for effective therapies for the highly heterogenous disease acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has remained elusive. While cytotoxic therapies can induce complete remission and even, at times, long-term survival, this approach is associated with significant toxic effects to visceral organs and worsening of immune dysfunction and marrow suppression leading to death. Sophisticated molecular studies have revealed defects within the AML cell that can be exploited by utilizing small molecule agents to target these defects, often dubbed "target therapy." Several medications have already established new standards of care for many patients with AML, including FDA-approved agents that inhibitor IDH1, IDH2, FLT3, and BCL-2. Emerging small molecules hold additional to add to the armamentarium of AML treatment options including MCL-1 inhibitors, TP53 inhibitors, menin inhibitors, and E-selectin antagonists. Moreover, the increasing options also mean that future combinations of these agents need to be explored, including with cytotoxic drugs and other newer emerging strategies such as immunotherapies for AML. Recent investigations continue to show that overcoming many of the challenges of treating AML finally is on the horizon.

An Overview of Targeted Therapies in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most aggressive adult leukemia, characterized by clonal differentiation arrest of progenitor or precursor hematopoietic cells. Intense preclinical and clinical research has led to regulatory approval of several targeted therapeutics, administered either as single agents or as combination therapies. However, the majority of patients still face a poor prognosis and disease relapse frequently occurs due to selection of therapy-resistant clones. Hence, more effective novel therapies, most likely as innovative, rational combination therapies, are urgently needed. Chromosomal aberrations, gene mutations, and epigenetic alterations drive AML pathogenesis but concurrently provide vulnerabilities to specifically target leukemic cells. Other molecules, either aberrantly active and/or overexpressed in leukemic stem cells, may also be leveraged for therapeutic benefit. This concise review of targeted therapies for AML treatment, which are either approved or are being actively investigated in clinical trials or recent preclinical studies, provides a flavor of the direction of travel, but also highlights the current challenges in AML treatment.

Molecularly Targeted Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Treatment Landscape and Mechanisms of Response and Resistance

Treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has evolved rapidly over the last decade as improved understanding of cytogenetic and molecular drivers of leukemogenesis refined survival prognostication and enabled development of targeted therapeutics. Molecularly targeted therapies are now approved for the treatment of FLT3 and IDH1/2-mutated AML and additional molecularly and cellularly targeted therapeutics are in development for defined patient subgroups. Alongside these welcome therapeutic advancements, increased understanding of leukemic biology and treatment resistance has resulted in clinical trials investigating combinations of cytotoxic, cellular, and molecularly targeted therapeutics resulting in improved response and survival outcomes in patients with AML. Herein, we comprehensively review the current landscape of IDH and FLT3 inhibitors in clinical practice for the treatment of AML, highlight known resistance mechanisms, and discuss new cellular or molecularly targeted therapies currently under investigation in ongoing early phase clinical trials.

The clinical impact of the molecular landscape of acute myeloid leukemia

Research into the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has led to remarkable advances in our understanding of the disease. Mutations now allow us to explore the enormous diversity among cytogenetically defined subsets of AML, particularly the large subset of cytogenetically normal AML. Despite the progress in unraveling the tumor genome, only a small number of recurrent mutations have been incorporated into risk-stratification schemes and have been proven to be clinically relevant, targetable lesions. The current World Health Organization Classification of myeloid neoplasms and leukemia includes eight AML categories defined by recurrent genetic abnormalities as well as three categories defined by gene mutations. We here discuss the utility of molecular markers in AML in prognostication and treatment decision-making. New therapies based on targetable markers include IDH inhibitors (ivosidenib, enasidenib), venetoclax-based therapy, FLT3 inhibitors (midostaurin, gilteritinib, and quizartinib), gemtuzumab ozogamicin, magrolimab and menin inhibitors.

Leukemic stem cells and therapy resistance in acute myeloid leukemia

A major obstacle in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is refractory disease or relapse after achieving remission. The latter arises from a few therapy-resistant cells within minimal residual disease (MRD). Resistant cells with long-term self-renewal capacity that drive clonal outgrowth are referred to as leukemic stem cells (LSC). The cancer stem cell concept considers LSC as relapse-initiating cells residing at the top of each genetically defined AML subclone forming epigenetically controlled downstream hierarchies. LSC display significant phenotypic and epigenetic plasticity, particularly in response to therapy stress, which results in various mechanisms mediating treatment resistance. Given the inherent chemotherapy resistance of LSC, targeted strategies must be incorporated into first-line regimens to prevent LSC-mediated AML relapse. The combination of venetoclax and azacitidine is a promising current strategy for the treatment of AML LSC. Nevertheless, the selection of patients who would benefit either from standard chemotherapy or venetoclax + azacitidine treatment in first-line therapy has yet to be established and the mechanisms of resistance still need to be discovered and overcome. Clinical trials are currently underway that investigate LSC susceptibility to first-line therapies. The era of single-cell multi-omics has begun to uncover the complex clonal and cellular architectures and associated biological networks. This should lead to a better understanding of the highly heterogeneous AML at the inter- and intra-patient level and identify resistance mechanisms by longitudinal analysis of patients' samples. This review discusses LSC biology and associated resistance mechanisms, potential therapeutic LSC vulnerabilities and current clinical trial activities.

Resistance to targeted therapies in acute myeloid leukemia

The introduction of new targeted therapies to the treatment algorithm of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) offers new opportunities, but also presents new challenges. Patients diagnosed with AML receiving targeted therapies as part of lower intensity regimens will relapse inevitably due to primary or secondary resistance mechanisms. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the main mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies in AML. Resistance to FLT3 inhibitors is mainly mediated by on target mutations and dysregulation of downstream pathways. Switching the FLT3 inhibitor has a potential therapeutic benefit. During treatment with IDH inhibitors resistance can develop due to aberrant cell metabolism or secondary site IDH mutations. As a unique resistance mechanism the mutated IDH isotype may switch from IDH1 to IDH2 or vice versa. Resistance to gemtuzumab-ozogamicin is determined by the CD33 isotype and the degradation of the cytotoxin. The main mechanisms of resistance to venetoclax are the dysregulation of alternative pathways especially the upregulation of the BCL-2-analogues MCL-1 and BCL-XL or the induction of an aberrant cell metabolism. The introduction of therapies targeting immune processes will lead to new forms of therapy resistance. Knowing those mechanisms will help to develop strategies that can overcome resistance to treatment.

Single-cell methods in myeloproliferative neoplasms: old questions, new technologies

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a group of clonal stem cell-derived hematopoietic malignancies driven by aberrant Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins (JAK/STAT) signaling. Although these are genetically simple diseases, MPNs are phenotypically heterogeneous, reflecting underlying intratumoral heterogeneity driven by the interplay of genetic and nongenetic factors. Their evolution is determined by factors that enable certain cellular subsets to outcompete others. Therefore, techniques that resolve cellular heterogeneity at the single-cell level are ideally placed to provide new insights into MPN biology. With these insights comes the potential to uncover new approaches to predict the clinical course and treat these cancers, ultimately improving outcomes for patients. MPNs present a particularly tractable model of cancer evolution, because most patients present in an early disease phase and only a small proportion progress to aggressive disease. Therefore, it is not surprising that many groundbreaking technological advances in single-cell omics have been pioneered by their application in MPNs. In this review article, we explore how single-cell approaches have provided transformative insights into MPN disease biology, which are broadly applicable across human cancers, and discuss how these studies might be swiftly translated into clinical pathways and may eventually underpin precision medicine.

Distinct and opposite effects of leukemogenic Idh and Tet2 mutations in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells

Mutations in IDH1, IDH2, and TET2 are recurrently observed in myeloid neoplasms. IDH1 and IDH2 encode isocitrate dehydrogenase isoforms, which normally catalyze the conversion of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate (α-KG). Oncogenic IDH1/2 mutations confer neomorphic activity, leading to the production of D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG), a potent inhibitor of α-KG-dependent enzymes which include the TET methylcytosine dioxygenases. Given their mutual exclusivity in myeloid neoplasms, IDH1, IDH2, and TET2 mutations may converge on a common oncogenic mechanism. Contrary to this expectation, we observed that they have distinct, and even opposite, effects on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in genetically engineered mice. Epigenetic and single-cell transcriptomic analyses revealed that Idh2^R172K and Tet2 loss-of-function have divergent consequences on the expression and activity of key hematopoietic and leukemogenic regulators. Notably, chromatin accessibility and transcriptional deregulation in Idh2^R172K cells were partially disconnected from DNA methylation alterations. These results highlight unanticipated divergent effects of IDH1/2 and TET2 mutations, providing support for the optimization of genotype-specific therapies.

Reconstructing mutational lineages in breast cancer by multi-patient-targeted single-cell DNA sequencing

Single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNA-seq) methods are powerful tools for profiling mutations in cancer cells; however, most genomic regions sequenced in single cells are non-informative. To overcome this issue, we developed a multi-patient-targeted (MPT) scDNA-seq method. MPT involves first performing bulk exome sequencing across a cohort of cancer patients to identify somatic mutations, which are then pooled together to develop a single custom targeted panel for high-throughput scDNA-seq using a microfluidics platform. We applied MPT to profile 330 mutations across 23,500 cells from 5 patients with triple negative-breast cancer (TNBC), which showed that 3 tumors were monoclonal and 2 tumors were polyclonal. From these data, we reconstructed mutational lineages and identified early mutational and copy-number events, including early TP53 mutations that occurred in all five patients. Collectively, our data suggest that MPT can overcome a major technical obstacle for studying tumor evolution using scDNA-seq by profiling information-rich mutation sites.

Disabling Uncompetitive Inhibition of Oncogenic IDH Mutations Drives Acquired Resistance

Mutations in IDH genes occur frequently in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and other human cancers to generate the oncometabolite R-2HG. Allosteric inhibition of mutant IDH suppresses R-2HG production in a subset of patients with AML; however, acquired resistance emerges as a new challenge, and the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Here we establish isogenic leukemia cells containing common IDH oncogenic mutations by CRISPR base editing. By mutational scanning of IDH single amino acid variants in base-edited cells, we describe a repertoire of IDH second-site mutations responsible for therapy resistance through disabling uncompetitive enzyme inhibition. Recurrent mutations at NADPH binding sites within IDH heterodimers act in cis or trans to prevent the formation of stable enzyme-inhibitor complexes, restore R-2HG production in the presence of inhibitors, and drive therapy resistance in IDH-mutant AML cells and patients. We therefore uncover a new class of pathogenic mutations and mechanisms for acquired resistance to targeted cancer therapies.

SIGNIFICANCE

Comprehensive scanning of IDH single amino acid variants in base-edited leukemia cells uncovers recurrent mutations conferring resistance to IDH inhibition through disabling NADPH-dependent uncompetitive inhibition. Together with targeted sequencing, structural, and functional studies, we identify a new class of pathogenic mutations and mechanisms for acquired resistance to IDH-targeting cancer therapies. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1.

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation drives leukemogenesis by PDGFRA activation due to insulator disruption in acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by complex molecular alterations and driver mutations. Elderly patients show increased frequencies of IDH mutations with high chemoresistance and relapse rates despite recent therapeutic advances. Besides being associated with global promoter hypermethylation, IDH1 mutation facilitated changes in 3D DNA-conformation by CTCF-anchor methylation and upregulated oncogene expression in glioma, correlating with poor prognosis. Here, we investigated the role of IDH1 p.R132H mutation in altering 3D DNA-architecture and subsequent oncogene activation in AML. Using public RNA-Seq data, we identified upregulation of tyrosine kinase PDGFRA in IDH1-mutant patients, correlating with poor prognosis. DNA methylation analysis identified CpG hypermethylation within a CTCF-anchor upstream of PDGFRA in IDH1-mutant patients. Increased PDGFRA expression, PDGFRA-CTCF methylation and decreased CTCF binding were confirmed in AML CRISPR cells with heterozygous IDH1 p.R132H mutation and upon exogenous 2-HG treatment. IDH1-mutant cells showed higher sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib, which was supported by reduced blast count in a patient with refractory IDH1-mutant AML after dasatinib treatment. Our data illustrate that IDH1 p.R132H mutation leads to CTCF hypermethylation, disrupting DNA-looping and insulation of PDGFRA, resulting in PDGFRA upregulation in IDH1-mutant AML. Treatment with dasatinib may offer a novel treatment strategy for IDH1-mutant AML.

Targeting STAT5 Signaling Overcomes Resistance to IDH Inhibitors in Acute Myeloid Leukemia through Suppression of Stemness

Mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and IDH2 block the differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells through production of R-2-hydroxyglutarate (R-2-HG). IDH inhibitors can induce differentiation of AML cells by lowering R-2-HG but have limited clinical efficacy as single agents. Here, we performed a genome-wide CRISPR knockout screen in an Idh1-mutated hematopoietic progenitor cell line to identify genes that increased the differentiation response to ivosidenib, an IDH1 inhibitor. The screen identified C-type lectin member 5a (Clec5a), which encodes a spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK)-coupled surface receptor, as one of the top hits. Knockout of Clec5a and Syk rendered cells more sensitive to ivosidenib-induced differentiation through a reduction in STAT5-dependent expression of stemness-related genes, including genes in the homeobox (HOX) family. Importantly, direct inhibition of STAT5 activity was sufficient to increase the differentiation response to IDH inhibitors in primary human IDH1- and IDH2-mutated AML cells, including those harboring mutations in receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and MAPK genes that have been linked to drug resistance. In patient-derived xenograft models of IDH1-mutated AML, combination treatment with ivosidenib and the STAT5 inhibitor pimozide was superior to each agent alone in inducing differentiation in leukemic cells without compromising normal hematopoiesis. These findings demonstrate that STAT5 is a critical mediator of resistance to IDH inhibitors and provide the rationale for combining STAT5 and IDH inhibitors in the treatment of IDH-mutated AML.

SIGNIFICANCE

A CRISPR knockout screen identifies a mechanism of resistance to IDH inhibitors in AML involving activated STAT5 signaling, suggesting a potential strategy to improve the clinical efficacy of IDH inhibitors.

Implications of RAS mutational status in subsets of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia across therapy subtypes

Activating mutations in RAS have been reported in about 10-15% of patients with AML; previous studies have not identified a prognostic significance. However, RAS mutations have emerged as a potential resistance mechanism to treatment with inhibitors of FLT3, IDH, and BCL2. We aimed to determine the characteristics and outcomes of patients with RAS-mutated (RAS-mut) AML across therapy subsets of 1410 patients newly diagnosed (ND AML). RAS-mut was observed in 273 (20%) patients. Overall, patients with RAS-mut AML had an estimated 3-year survival rate of 38% vs. 28% in those with RAS wild type (RAS-wt), p = .01. Among patients with RAS-mut, favorable karyotype and concomitant NPM1 mutations were associated with a higher CR/CRi rate, OR 23.2 (95% CI: 2.7-192.7; p < .001) and OR 2.8 (95% CI: 1.1-6.9; p = .02), respectively, while secondary and treated secondary (ts)-AML were associated with low response rates, OR 0.34 (95% CI: 0.1-0.9; p = .04) and OR 0.22 (95% CI: 0.09-0.5; p = .001), respectively. Intensive chemotherapy was associated with high response rates OR 5.9 (95% CI: 2.9-12.2; p < .001). Better median OS was observed among those with favorable karyotype, HR 0.28 (95% CI: 0.1-0.6; p = .002), and those treated with intensive chemotherapy, HR 0.42 (95% CI: 0.2-0.6 p < .001). Conversely, ts- AML and co-occurrence of mutations in TP53 were associated with poor median OS; HR 2.3 (95% CI: 1.4-3.9; p = .001) and HR 1.7 (95% CI: 0.9-3.1; p = .06), respectively. The addition of venetoclax was associated with a non-significant improvement in CR/CRi and OS.

IDH Inhibitors and Immunotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer: A Marriage of Convenience?

Systemic treatments have traditionally reported limited efficacy for biliary tract cancer (BTC), and although targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been found to play an increasingly important role in treatment, several questions remain unanswered, including the identification of biomarkers of response. The tumor microenvironment (TME) has recently attracted the attention of the BTC medical community, and is currently being studied due to its potential role in modulating response and resistance to systemic therapies, including immunotherapy. In this perspective article, we discuss available evidence regarding the interplay between TME, IDH inhibitors, and immunotherapy, providing rationale for the design of future clinical trials.

Inhibition of mutant IDH1 promotes cycling of acute myeloid leukemia stem cells

Approximately 20% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients carry mutations in IDH1 or IDH2 that result in over-production of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG). Small molecule inhibitors that block 2-HG synthesis can induce complete morphological remission; however, almost all patients eventually acquire drug resistance and relapse. Using a multi-allelic mouse model of IDH1-mutant AML, we demonstrate that the clinical IDH1 inhibitor AG-120 (ivosidenib) exerts cell-type-dependent effects on leukemic cells, promoting delayed disease regression. Although single-agent AG-120 treatment does not fully eradicate the disease, it increases cycling of rare leukemia stem cells and triggers transcriptional upregulation of the pyrimidine salvage pathway. Accordingly, AG-120 sensitizes IDH1-mutant AML to azacitidine, with the combination of AG-120 and azacitidine showing vastly improved efficacy in vivo. Our data highlight the impact of non-genetic heterogeneity on treatment response and provide a mechanistic rationale for the observed combinatorial effect of AG-120 and azacitidine in patients.

Efficacy of FLT3 and IDH1/2 Inhibitors in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Previously Treated with Venetoclax

Small molecule inhibitors targeting mutant FLT3, IDH1, and IDH2 as well as venetoclax-based combination therapies have expanded treatment options for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). As the landmark trials leading to the approval of FLT3, IDH1, and IDH2 inhibitors in R/R-AML were conducted prior to the widespread use of venetoclax, it is unclear how these results apply in the current era of venetoclax based therapy frequently being used in the frontline treatment of AML. In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, we included 53 patients who received FLT3, IDH1 or IDH2 inhibitors after disease progression on venetoclax-based therapy. Among patients treated with targeted agents after venetoclax, the overall response rate (ORR; composite of complete remission [CR]/CR with incomplete count recovery, partial remission, and morphologic leukemia free state) was 17.7 % (n = 9 patients) and median OS of 4.2 months. Eight of 9 patients responding to targeted agents after venetoclax received gilteritinib. None of the patients with RAS pathway mutations responded to targeted agents after venetoclax. Additionally, mutations in TP53 and KRAS were associated with shorter OS among patients treated targeted agents. Our data suggest that response rates to targeted therapies after venetoclax are low and novel therapeutic strategies are warranted.

Properties of Leukemic Stem Cells in Regulating Drug Resistance in Acute and Chronic Myeloid Leukemias

Notoriously known for their capacity to reconstitute hematological malignancies in vivo, leukemic stem cells (LSCs) represent key drivers of therapeutic resistance and disease relapse, posing as a major medical dilemma. Despite having low abundance in the bulk leukemic population, LSCs have developed unique molecular dependencies and intricate signaling networks to enable self-renewal, quiescence, and drug resistance. To illustrate the multi-dimensional landscape of LSC-mediated leukemogenesis, in this review, we present phenotypical characteristics of LSCs, address the LSC-associated leukemic stromal microenvironment, highlight molecular aberrations that occur in the transcriptome, epigenome, proteome, and metabolome of LSCs, and showcase promising novel therapeutic strategies that potentially target the molecular vulnerabilities of LSCs.

The Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance to IDH Inhibitors in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Gain-of-function mutations of isocitrate dehydrogenases 1/2 (IDH1/2) play crucial roles in the development and progression of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which provide promising therapeutic targets. Two small molecular inhibitors, ivosidenib and enasidenib have been approved for the treatment of IDH1- and IDH2-mutant AML, respectively. Although these inhibitors benefit patients with AML clinically, drug resistance still occurs and have become a major problem for targeted therapies of IDH-mutant AML. A number of up-to-date studies have demonstrated molecular mechanisms of resistance, providing rationales of novel therapeutic strategies targeting mutant IDH1/2. In this review, we discuss mechanisms of resistance to ivosidenib and enasidenib in patients with AML.

Resistance to targeted therapies: delving into FLT3 and IDH

Recent advances in FLT3 and IDH targeted inhibition have improved response rates and overall survival in patients with mutations affecting these respective proteins. Despite this success, resistance mechanisms have arisen including mutations that disrupt inhibitor-target interaction, mutations impacting alternate pathways, and changes in the microenvironment. Here we review the role of these proteins in leukemogenesis, their respective inhibitors, mechanisms of resistance, and briefly ongoing studies aimed at overcoming resistance.

The Promise of Single-cell Technology in Providing New Insights Into the Molecular Heterogeneity and Management of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Drug resistance and treatment failure in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are in part driven by tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution. Although bulk tumor genomic analyses have provided some insight into these processes, single-cell sequencing has emerged as a powerful technique to profile individual cells in unprecedented detail. Since the introduction of single-cell RNA sequencing, we now have the capability to capture not only transcriptomic, but also genomic, epigenetic, and proteomic variation between single cells separately and in combination. This rapidly evolving field has the potential to transform our understanding of the fundamental biology of pediatric ALL and guide the management of ALL patients to improve their clinical outcome. Here, we discuss the impact single-cell sequencing has had on our understanding of tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution in ALL and provide examples of how single-cell technology can be integrated into the clinic to inform treatment decisions for children with high-risk disease.

IDH mutation and cancer stem cell

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a small population of cells in human malignancies that resemble the biology of human pluripotent stem cells. CSCs are closely related to the critical hallmarks in human cancers, ranging from oncogenesis to disease progression, therapeutic resistance, and overall outcome. Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) were recently identified as founder mutations for human cancers. An increasing amount of evidence indicates that IDH mutations are closely related to the establishment and maintenance of CSCs. Biosynthesis of oncometabolite, metabolic reprogramming, and epigenetic shifts establish distinctive molecular signatures in IDH-mutated CSCs. Additionally, IDH mutation and IDH-related pathways could be valuable molecular targets to impact the CSC components in human cancers and to improve the disease outcome.

Biology of IDH mutant cholangiocarcinoma

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) are the most frequently mutated metabolic genes across human cancers. These hotspot gain-of-function mutations cause the IDH enzyme to aberrantly generate high levels of the oncometabolite, R-2-hydroxyglutarate, which competitively inhibits enzymes that regulate epigenetics, DNA repair, metabolism, and other processes. Among epithelial malignancies, IDH mutations are particularly common in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Importantly, pharmacological inhibition of mutant IDH (mIDH) 1 delays progression of mIDH1 iCCA, indicating a role for this oncogene in tumor maintenance. However, not all patients receive clinical benefit, and those who do typically show stable disease rather than significant tumor regressions. The elucidation of the oncogenic functions of mIDH is needed to inform strategies that can more effectively harness mIDH as a therapeutic target. This review will discuss the biology of mIDH iCCA, including roles of mIDH in blocking cell differentiation programs and suppressing antitumor immunity, and the potential relevance of these effects to mIDH1-targeted therapy. We also cover opportunities for synthetic lethal therapeutic interactions that harness the altered cell state provoked by mIDH1 rather than inhibiting the mutant enzyme. Finally, we highlight key outstanding questions in the biology of this fascinating and incompletely understood oncogene.