1
|
Kaplan HG, Dowdell AK, Berry AB, Shimol RB, Robinson FL, Carney CA, Piening BD. Multi-omic profiling of simultaneous ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 205:451-464. [PMID: 38523186 PMCID: PMC11101558 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07270-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The progression of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) in humans is highly variable. To better understand the relationship between them, we performed a multi-omic characterization of co-occurring DCIS and IBC lesions in a cohort of individuals. METHODS Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 50 patients with co-occurring DCIS and IBC lesions were subjected to DNA-seq and whole transcriptome RNA-seq. Paired DCIS and IBC multi-omics profiles were then interrogated for DNA mutations, gene expression profiles and pathway analysis. RESULTS Most small variants and copy number variations were shared between co-occurring DCIS and IBC lesions, with IBC exhibiting on average a higher degree of additional mutations. However, 36% of co-occurring lesions shared no common mutations and 49% shared no common copy number variations. The most frequent genomic variants in both DCIS and IBC were PIK3CA, TP53, KMT2C, MAP3K1, GATA3 and SF3B1, with KMT2C being more frequent in DCIS and TP53 and MAP3K1 more frequent in IBC, though the numbers are too small for definitive conclusions. The most frequent copy number variations were seen in MCL1, CKSB1 and ERBB2. ERBB2 changes were not seen in IBC unless present in the corresponding DCIS. Transcriptional profiles were highly distinct between DCIS and IBC, with DCIS exhibiting upregulation of immune-related signatures, while IBC showed significant overexpression in genes and pathways associated with cell division and proliferation. Interestingly, DCIS and IBC exhibited significant differential expression of different components of extracellular matrix (ECM) formation and regulation, with DCIS showing overexpression of ECM-membrane interaction components while IBC showed upregulation of genes associated with fibronectin and invadopodia. CONCLUSION While most co-occurring DCIS and IBC were mutationally similar and suggestive of a common clonal progenitor, transcriptionally the lesions are highly distinct, with IBC expressing key pathways that facilitate invasion and proliferation. These results are suggestive of additional levels of regulation, epigenetic or other, that facilitate the acquisition of invasive properties during tumor evolution.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Female
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/genetics
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Mutation
- DNA Copy Number Variations
- Gene Expression Profiling/methods
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Invasiveness
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
- Transcriptome
- Aged
- Adult
- Genomics/methods
- Multiomics
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry G Kaplan
- Swedish Cancer Institute, 1221 Madison St., Suite 920, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
| | - Alexa K Dowdell
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Health, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
| | - Anna B Berry
- Swedish Cancer Institute, 1221 Madison St., Suite 920, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA
| | - Racheli Ben Shimol
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Health, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
| | - Fred L Robinson
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Health, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
| | | | - Brian D Piening
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Health, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ali HR, West RB. Spatial Biology of Breast Cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2024; 14:a041335. [PMID: 38110242 PMCID: PMC11065165 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Spatial findings have shaped on our understanding of breast cancer. In this review, we discuss how spatial methods, including spatial transcriptomics and proteomics and the resultant understanding of spatial relationships, have contributed to concepts regarding cancer progression and treatment. In addition to discussing traditional approaches, we examine how emerging multiplex imaging technologies have contributed to the field and how they might influence future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Raza Ali
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom
| | - Robert B West
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang J, Li B, Luo M, Huang J, Zhang K, Zheng S, Zhang S, Zhou J. Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: molecular features and clinical significance. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2024; 9:83. [PMID: 38570490 PMCID: PMC10991592 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-024-01779-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents pre-invasive breast carcinoma. In untreated cases, 25-60% DCIS progress to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). The challenge lies in distinguishing between non-progressive and progressive DCIS, often resulting in over- or under-treatment in many cases. With increasing screen-detected DCIS in these years, the nature of DCIS has aroused worldwide attention. A deeper understanding of the biological nature of DCIS and the molecular journey of the DCIS-IDC transition is crucial for more effective clinical management. Here, we reviewed the key signaling pathways in breast cancer that may contribute to DCIS initiation and progression. We also explored the molecular features of DCIS and IDC, shedding light on the progression of DCIS through both inherent changes within tumor cells and alterations in the tumor microenvironment. In addition, valuable research tools utilized in studying DCIS including preclinical models and newer advanced technologies such as single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics and artificial intelligence, have been systematically summarized. Further, we thoroughly discussed the clinical advancements in DCIS and IDC, including prognostic biomarkers and clinical managements, with the aim of facilitating more personalized treatment strategies in the future. Research on DCIS has already yielded significant insights into breast carcinogenesis and will continue to pave the way for practical clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Wang
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China
| | - Baizhou Li
- Department of Pathology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China
| | - Meng Luo
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Plastic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jia Huang
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China
| | - Kun Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shu Zheng
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China
| | - Suzhan Zhang
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Jiaojiao Zhou
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China.
- Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mangla B, Mittal P, Kumar P, Javed S, Ahsan W, Aggarwal G. Development of erlotinib-loaded nanotransferosomal gel for the topical treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2024; 19:855-874. [PMID: 38440976 DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2023-0260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Aims: This study was aimed to formulate erlotinib (ERL)-loaded transferosomal gel (ERL@TG) intended for topical application for the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ. Materials & methods: The optimized process involved a thin-film hydration method to generate ERL-loaded transferosomes (ERL@TFS), which was incorporated into a carbopol gel matrix to generate ERL@TG. The optimized formulation was characterized in vitro followed by cytotoxicity evaluation on MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines and acute toxicity and skin irritation studies was performed in vivo. Results: In a comparative assessment against plain ERL, ERL@TG displayed enhanced efficacy against MCF-7 cell lines, reflected in considerably lower IC50 values with an enhanced safety profile. Conclusion: Optimized ERL@TG was identified as a promising avenue for addressing ductal carcinoma in situ breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bharti Mangla
- Centre for Advanced Formulation & Technology, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi, 110017, India
| | - Priya Mittal
- Centre for Advanced Formulation & Technology, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi, 110017, India
| | - Pankaj Kumar
- Centre for Advanced Formulation & Technology, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi, 110017, India
| | - Shamama Javed
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, PO box no. 114, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
| | - Waquar Ahsan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, PO box no. 114, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
| | - Geeta Aggarwal
- Centre for Advanced Formulation & Technology, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi, 110017, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang K, Kumar T, Wang J, Minussi DC, Sei E, Li J, Tran TM, Thennavan A, Hu M, Casasent AK, Xiao Z, Bai S, Yang L, King LM, Shah V, Kristel P, van der Borden CL, Marks JR, Zhao Y, Zurita AJ, Aparicio A, Chapin B, Ye J, Zhang J, Gibbons DL, Sawyer E, Thompson AM, Futreal A, Hwang ES, Wesseling J, Lips EH, Navin NE. Archival single-cell genomics reveals persistent subclones during DCIS progression. Cell 2023; 186:3968-3982.e15. [PMID: 37586362 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a common precursor of invasive breast cancer. Our understanding of its genomic progression to recurrent disease remains poor, partly due to challenges associated with the genomic profiling of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) materials. Here, we developed Arc-well, a high-throughput single-cell DNA-sequencing method that is compatible with FFPE materials. We validated our method by profiling 40,330 single cells from cell lines, a frozen tissue, and 27 FFPE samples from breast, lung, and prostate tumors stored for 3-31 years. Analysis of 10 patients with matched DCIS and cancers that recurred 2-16 years later show that many primary DCIS had already undergone whole-genome doubling and clonal diversification and that they shared genomic lineages with persistent subclones in the recurrences. Evolutionary analysis suggests that most DCIS cases in our cohort underwent an evolutionary bottleneck, and further identified chromosome aberrations in the persistent subclones that were associated with recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaile Wang
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Tapsi Kumar
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; MD Anderson UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genomic Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Junke Wang
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; MD Anderson UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Darlan Conterno Minussi
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; MD Anderson UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Emi Sei
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jianzhuo Li
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Tuan M Tran
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Aatish Thennavan
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Min Hu
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Anna K Casasent
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Zhenna Xiao
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Shanshan Bai
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lei Yang
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; MD Anderson UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lorraine M King
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27707, USA
| | - Vandna Shah
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - Petra Kristel
- Division of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Carolien L van der Borden
- Division of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27707, USA
| | - Yuehui Zhao
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Amado J Zurita
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ana Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brian Chapin
- Department of Urology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jie Ye
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; MD Anderson UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jianjun Zhang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Don L Gibbons
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ellinor Sawyer
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - Alastair M Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Andrew Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - E Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27707, USA
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam 1066 CX, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZC, the Netherlands
| | - Esther H Lips
- Department of Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam 1066 CX, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZC, the Netherlands
| | - Nicholas E Navin
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; MD Anderson UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Bioinformatics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Strand SH, Rivero-Gutiérrez B, Houlahan KE, Seoane JA, King LM, Risom T, Simpson LA, Vennam S, Khan A, Cisneros L, Hardman T, Harmon B, Couch F, Gallagher K, Kilgore M, Wei S, DeMichele A, King T, McAuliffe PF, Nangia J, Lee J, Tseng J, Storniolo AM, Thompson AM, Gupta GP, Burns R, Veis DJ, DeSchryver K, Zhu C, Matusiak M, Wang J, Zhu SX, Tappenden J, Ding DY, Zhang D, Luo J, Jiang S, Varma S, Anderson L, Straub C, Srivastava S, Curtis C, Tibshirani R, Angelo RM, Hall A, Owzar K, Polyak K, Maley C, Marks JR, Colditz GA, Hwang ES, West RB. Molecular classification and biomarkers of clinical outcome in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: Analysis of TBCRC 038 and RAHBT cohorts. Cancer Cell 2022; 40:1521-1536.e7. [PMID: 36400020 PMCID: PMC9772081 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the most common precursor of invasive breast cancer (IBC), with variable propensity for progression. We perform multiscale, integrated molecular profiling of DCIS with clinical outcomes by analyzing 774 DCIS samples from 542 patients with 7.3 years median follow-up from the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium 038 study and the Resource of Archival Breast Tissue cohorts. We identify 812 genes associated with ipsilateral recurrence within 5 years from treatment and develop a classifier that predicts DCIS or IBC recurrence in both cohorts. Pathways associated with recurrence include proliferation, immune response, and metabolism. Distinct stromal expression patterns and immune cell compositions are identified. Our multiscale approach employed in situ methods to generate a spatially resolved atlas of breast precancers, where complementary modalities can be directly compared and correlated with conventional pathology findings, disease states, and clinical outcome.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Female
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/genetics
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Disease Progression
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Biomarkers
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siri H Strand
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Belén Rivero-Gutiérrez
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Kathleen E Houlahan
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Jose A Seoane
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lorraine M King
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Tyler Risom
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Lunden A Simpson
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Sujay Vennam
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Aziz Khan
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Luis Cisneros
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
| | - Timothy Hardman
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Bryan Harmon
- Department of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467, USA; TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Fergus Couch
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA
| | - Kristalyn Gallagher
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Mark Kilgore
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Shi Wei
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Angela DeMichele
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Tari King
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Priscilla F McAuliffe
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Julie Nangia
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX 77030, USA
| | - Joanna Lee
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jennifer Tseng
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Anna Maria Storniolo
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Alastair M Thompson
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX 77030, USA; Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Gaorav P Gupta
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Robyn Burns
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; TBCRC, The EMMES Corporation, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Deborah J Veis
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA; Departments of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Katherine DeSchryver
- Departments of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Chunfang Zhu
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Magdalena Matusiak
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Jason Wang
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Shirley X Zhu
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Jen Tappenden
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Daisy Yi Ding
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Dadong Zhang
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Jingqin Luo
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Shu Jiang
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Sushama Varma
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Lauren Anderson
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Cody Straub
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Sucheta Srivastava
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Christina Curtis
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Medicine and Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Rob Tibshirani
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Robert Michael Angelo
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Allison Hall
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Kouros Owzar
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA; Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Kornelia Polyak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Carlo Maley
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Graham A Colditz
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - E Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
| | - Robert B West
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Langille E, Al-Zahrani KN, Ma Z, Liang M, Uuskula-Reimand L, Espin R, Teng K, Malik A, Bergholtz H, El Ghamrasni S, Afiuni-Zadeh S, Tsai R, Alvi S, Elia A, Lü Y, Oh RH, Kozma KJ, Trcka D, Narimatsu M, Liu JC, Nguyen T, Barutcu S, Loganathan SK, Bremner R, Bader GD, Egan SE, Cescon DW, Sørlie T, Wrana JL, Jackson HW, Wilson MD, Witkiewicz AK, Knudsen ES, Pujana MA, Wahl GM, Schramek D. Loss of Epigenetic Regulation Disrupts Lineage Integrity, Induces Aberrant Alveogenesis, and Promotes Breast Cancer. Cancer Discov 2022; 12:2930-2953. [PMID: 36108220 PMCID: PMC9812400 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Systematically investigating the scores of genes mutated in cancer and discerning disease drivers from inconsequential bystanders is a prerequisite for precision medicine but remains challenging. Here, we developed a somatic CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis screen to study 215 recurrent "long-tail" breast cancer genes, which revealed epigenetic regulation as a major tumor-suppressive mechanism. We report that components of the BAP1 and COMPASS-like complexes, including KMT2C/D, KDM6A, BAP1, and ASXL1/2 ("EpiDrivers"), cooperate with PIK3CAH1047R to transform mouse and human breast epithelial cells. Mechanistically, we find that activation of PIK3CAH1047R and concomitant EpiDriver loss triggered an alveolar-like lineage conversion of basal mammary epithelial cells and accelerated formation of luminal-like tumors, suggesting a basal origin for luminal tumors. EpiDriver mutations are found in ∼39% of human breast cancers, and ∼50% of ductal carcinoma in situ express casein, suggesting that lineage infidelity and alveogenic mimicry may significantly contribute to early steps of breast cancer etiology. SIGNIFICANCE Infrequently mutated genes comprise most of the mutational burden in breast tumors but are poorly understood. In vivo CRISPR screening identified functional tumor suppressors that converged on epigenetic regulation. Loss of epigenetic regulators accelerated tumorigenesis and revealed lineage infidelity and aberrant expression of alveogenesis genes as potential early events in tumorigenesis. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2711.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Langille
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Khalid N. Al-Zahrani
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zhibo Ma
- Gene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Minggao Liang
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 0A4, Canada
| | | | - Roderic Espin
- Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Oncobell, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Katie Teng
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ahmad Malik
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Helga Bergholtz
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway
| | - Samah El Ghamrasni
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Somaieh Afiuni-Zadeh
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ricky Tsai
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sana Alvi
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 0A4, Canada
| | - Andrew Elia
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - YiQing Lü
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robin H. Oh
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katelyn J. Kozma
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 0A4, Canada
| | - Daniel Trcka
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Masahiro Narimatsu
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeff C. Liu
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas Nguyen
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Seda Barutcu
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sampath K. Loganathan
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rod Bremner
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gary D. Bader
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sean E. Egan
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 0A4, Canada
| | - David W. Cescon
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Therese Sørlie
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0315 Oslo, Norway
| | - Jeffrey L. Wrana
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hartland W. Jackson
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael D. Wilson
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 0A4, Canada
| | | | - Erik S. Knudsen
- Center for Personalized Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Miguel Angel Pujana
- Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Oncobell, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Geoffrey M. Wahl
- Gene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Daniel Schramek
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Casasent AK, Almekinders MM, Mulder C, Bhattacharjee P, Collyar D, Thompson AM, Jonkers J, Lips EH, van Rheenen J, Hwang ES, Nik-Zainal S, Navin NE, Wesseling J. Learning to distinguish progressive and non-progressive ductal carcinoma in situ. Nat Rev Cancer 2022; 22:663-678. [PMID: 36261705 DOI: 10.1038/s41568-022-00512-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive breast neoplasia that accounts for 25% of all screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed annually. Neoplastic cells in DCIS are confined to the ductal system of the breast, although they can escape and progress to invasive breast cancer in a subset of patients. A key concern of DCIS is overtreatment, as most patients screened for DCIS and in whom DCIS is diagnosed will not go on to exhibit symptoms or die of breast cancer, even if left untreated. However, differentiating low-risk, indolent DCIS from potentially progressive DCIS remains challenging. In this Review, we summarize our current knowledge of DCIS and explore open questions about the basic biology of DCIS, including those regarding how genomic events in neoplastic cells and the surrounding microenvironment contribute to the progression of DCIS to invasive breast cancer. Further, we discuss what information will be needed to prevent overtreatment of indolent DCIS lesions without compromising adequate treatment for high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna K Casasent
- Department of Genetics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Charlotta Mulder
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Jos Jonkers
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Esther H Lips
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jacco van Rheenen
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Serena Nik-Zainal
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nicholas E Navin
- Department of Genetics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Bioinformatics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zheng ZY, Elsarraj H, Lei JT, Hong Y, Anurag M, Feng L, Kennedy H, Shen Y, Lo F, Zhao Z, Zhang B, Zhang XHF, Tawfik OW, Behbod F, Chang EC. Elevated NRAS expression during DCIS is a potential driver for progression to basal-like properties and local invasiveness. Breast Cancer Res 2022; 24:68. [PMID: 36258226 PMCID: PMC9578182 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-022-01565-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the most common type of in situ premalignant breast cancers. What drives DCIS to invasive breast cancer is unclear. Basal-like invasive breast cancers are aggressive. We have previously shown that NRAS is highly expressed selectively in basal-like subtypes of invasive breast cancers and can promote their growth and progression. In this study, we investigated whether NRAS expression at the DCIS stage can control transition from luminal DCIS to basal-like invasive breast cancers. METHODS Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed to assess expression of NRAS in DCIS compared to invasive breast tumors in patients. NRAS mRNA levels were also determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization in patient tumor microarrays (TMAs) with concurrent normal, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer, and association of NRAS mRNA levels with DCIS and invasive breast cancer was assessed by paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Pearson's correlation was calculated between NRAS mRNA levels and basal biomarkers in the TMAs, as well as in patient datasets. RNA-seq data were generated in cell lines, and unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed after combining with RNA-seq data from a previously published patient cohort. RESULTS Invasive breast cancers showed higher NRAS mRNA levels compared to DCIS samples. These NRAShigh lesions were also enriched with basal-like features, such as basal gene expression signatures, lower ER, and higher p53 protein and Ki67 levels. We have shown previously that NRAS drives aggressive features in DCIS-like and basal-like SUM102PT cells. Here, we found that NRAS-silencing induced a shift to a luminal gene expression pattern. Conversely, NRAS overexpression in the luminal DCIS SUM225 cells induced a basal-like gene expression pattern, as well as an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition signature. Furthermore, these cells formed disorganized mammospheres containing cell masses with an apparent reduction in adhesion. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that elevated NRAS levels in DCIS are not only a marker but can also control the emergence of basal-like features leading to more aggressive tumor activity, thus supporting the therapeutic hypothesis that targeting NRAS and/or downstream pathways may block disease progression for a subset of DCIS patients with high NRAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ze-Yi Zheng
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Hanan Elsarraj
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Jonathan T Lei
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yan Hong
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Meenakshi Anurag
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Long Feng
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of Pathogenic Organism Biology, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Hilda Kennedy
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yichao Shen
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Flora Lo
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Zifan Zhao
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Cancer Cell Biology Graduate Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Bing Zhang
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Xiang H-F Zhang
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ossama W Tawfik
- MAWD Pathology Group, St. Luke's Hospital, Lenexa, KS, 66215, USA
| | - Fariba Behbod
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
| | - Eric C Chang
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Loudig O, Mitchell MI, Ben-Dov IZ, Liu C, Fineberg S. MiRNA expression deregulation correlates with the Oncotype DX ® DCIS score. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH : BCR 2022; 24:62. [PMID: 36096802 PMCID: PMC9469592 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-022-01558-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Current clinical criteria do not discriminate well between women who will or those who will not develop ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (IBC), or a DCIS recurrence after a ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosis. The 12-gene Oncotype DX® DCIS assay (RT qPCR gene-based scoring system) was established and shown to predict the risk of subsequent ipsilateral IBC or DCIS recurrence. Recent studies have shown that microRNA (miRNA) expression deregulation can contribute to the development of IBC, but very few have evaluated miRNA deregulation in DCIS lesions. In this study, we sought to determine whether specific miRNA expression changes may correlate with Oncotype DX® DCIS scores. Methods For this study, we used archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens from 41 women diagnosed with DCIS between 2012 and 2018. The DCIS lesions were stratified into low (n = 26), intermediate (n = 10), and high (n = 5) risk score groups using the Oncotype DX® DCIS assay. Total RNA was extracted from DCIS lesions by macro-dissection of unstained FFPE sections, and next-generation small-RNA sequencing was performed. We evaluated the correlation between miRNA expression data and Oncotype score, as well as patient age. RT-qPCR validations were performed to validate the topmost differentially expressed miRNAs identified between the different risk score groups. Results MiRNA sequencing of 32 FFPE DCIS specimens from the three different risk group scores identified a correlation between expression deregulation of 17 miRNAs and Oncotype scores. Our analyses also revealed a correlation between the expression deregulation of 9 miRNAs and the patient’s age. Based on these results, a total of 15 miRNAs were selected for RT-qPCR validation. Of these, miR-190b (p = 0.043), miR-135a (p = 0.05), miR-205 (p = 0.00056), miR-30c (p = 0.011), and miR-744 (p = 0.038) showed a decreased expression in the intermediate/high Oncotype group when compared to the low-risk score group. A composite risk score was established using these 5 miRNAs and indicated a significant association between miRNA expression deregulation and the Oncotype DX® DCIS Score (p < 0.0021), between high/intermediate and low risk groups. Conclusions Our analyses identified a subset of 5 miRNAs able to discriminate between Oncotype DX® DCIS score subgroups. Together, our data suggest that miRNA expression analysis may add value to the predictive and prognostic evaluation of DCIS lesions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-022-01558-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Loudig
- Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA.
| | - Megan I Mitchell
- Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA
| | - Iddo Z Ben-Dov
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hadassah Medical Center, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Christina Liu
- Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Department of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jiang S, Cook RJ. The polytomous discrimination index for prediction involving multistate processes under intermittent observation. Stat Med 2022; 41:3661-3678. [PMID: 35596238 PMCID: PMC9308735 DOI: 10.1002/sim.9441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
With the increasing importance of predictive modeling in health research comes the need for methods to rigorously assess predictive accuracy. We consider the problem of evaluating the accuracy of predictive models for nominal outcomes when outcome data are coarsened at random. We first consider the problem in the context of a multinomial response modeled by polytomous logistic regression. Attention is then directed to the motivating setting in which class membership corresponds to the state occupied in a multistate disease process at a time horizon of interest. Here, class (state) membership may be unknown at the time horizon since disease processes are under intermittent observation. We propose a novel extension to the polytomous discrimination index to address this and evaluate the predictive accuracy of an intensity-based model in the context of a study involving patients with arthritis from a registry at the University of Toronto Centre for Prognosis Studies in Rheumatic Diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu Jiang
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Richard J. Cook
- Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yang L, Shen M, Qiu Y, Tang T, Bu H. Molecular subtyping reveals uniqueness of prognosis in breast ductal carcinoma in situ patients with lumpectomy. Breast 2022; 64:1-6. [PMID: 35462343 PMCID: PMC9039875 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to analyse the discrepancy in clinical features and prognosis between molecular subtypes in primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients with lumpectomy. Methods Primary DCIS patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries database from 2010 to 2017. Based on immunohistochemistry markers of hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), enrolled DCIS cases were divided into four molecular subtypes, HR-HER2-, HR-HER2+, HR + HER2+, and HR + HER2-. Clinical features and prognosis were compared between molecular subtypes. Radiotherapy (RT) effects on prognosis were also analysed in each molecular subtype. Results A total of 5,628 DCIS cases were retrospectively enrolled in this study. HR-HER2-, HR-HER2+, HR+HER2+, and HR+HER2- are 299 (5.3%), 498 (8.8%), 1,086 (19.3%), and 3,745 (66.5%), respectively. HR + HER2- cases have smaller tumor size (72.6%, P < 0.001) and lower grade (23.5%, P < 0.001). Comedo necrosis is more frequent in HR-HER2- (24.4%, P < 0.001) and HR-HER2+ DCIS cases (24.3%, P < 0.001). In univariate analyses, HR-HER2+ cases have significantly higher ipsilateral breast event (IBE) recurrence than HR+HER2- cases (P = 0.010). HR-HER2- cases show higher disease-specific mortality than HR+HER2+ cases (P = 0.021). In high-risk DCIS cases, RT reduces the absolute 5-year IBE incidence by 1.3%, 0.7%, 1.9%, and 2.6%, respectively in HR-HER2-, HR-HER2+, HR+HER2+, and HR+HER2- cases, respectively. Conclusion In this population-based study, DCIS cases have diverse clinical and prognostic features for different molecular subtypes. Adjusting treatment strategies according to DCIS molecular subtypes is worth advancing. HR-HER2+ DCIS shows the highest proportion of high-risk cases. HR + HER2- DCIS shows lowest proportion of high-risk cases. HR-HER2+ DCIS shows high risk of IBE recurrence. The DSmortality has no differences among four molecular subtypes. RT lowered the probability of IBE incidence in high-risk cases for each molecular subtype of DCIS.
Collapse
|
13
|
Thennavan A, Garcia-Recio S, Liu S, He X, Perou CM. Molecular signatures of in situ to invasive progression for basal-like breast cancers: An integrated mouse model and human DCIS study. NPJ Breast Cancer 2022; 8:83. [PMID: 35851387 PMCID: PMC9293914 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00450-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a non-obligate precursor of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC) and thus the identification of features that may predict DCIS progression would be of potential clinical value. Experimental mouse models can be used to address this challenge by studying DCIS-to-IDC biology. Here we utilize single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) on the C3Tag genetically engineered mouse model that forms DCIS-like precursor lesions and for which many lesions progress into end-stage basal-like molecular subtype IDC. We also perform bulk RNAseq analysis on 10 human synchronous DCIS-IDC pairs comprised of estrogen receptor (ER) positive and ER-negative subsets and utilize 2 additional public human DCIS data sets for comparison to our mouse model. By identifying malignant cells using inferred DNA copy number changes from the murine C3Tag scRNAseq data, we show the existence of cancer cells within the C3Tag pre-DCIS, DCIS, and IDC-like tumor specimens. These cancer cells were further classified into proliferative, hypoxic, and inflammatory subpopulations, which change in frequency in DCIS versus IDC. The C3Tag tumor progression model was also associated with increase in Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts and decrease in activated T cells in IDC. Importantly, we translate the C3Tag murine genomic findings into human DCIS where we find common features only with human basal-like DCIS, suggesting there are intrinsic subtype unique DCIS features. This study identifies several tumor and microenvironmental features associated with DCIS progression and may also provide genomic signatures that can identify progression-prone DCIS within the context of human basal-like breast cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aatish Thennavan
- Oral and Craniofacial Biomedicine Program, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Susana Garcia-Recio
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Siyao Liu
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Xiaping He
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Charles M Perou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wang G, Kumar A, Ding W, Korangath P, Bera T, Wei J, Pai P, Gabrielson K, Pastan I, Sukumar S. Intraductal administration of transferrin receptor-targeted immunotoxin clears ductal carcinoma in situ in mouse models of breast cancer-a preclinical study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2200200119. [PMID: 35675429 PMCID: PMC9214490 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2200200119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The human transferrin receptor (TFR) is overexpressed in most breast cancers, including preneoplastic ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). HB21(Fv)-PE40 is a single-chain immunotoxin (IT) engineered by fusing the variable region of a monoclonal antibody (HB21) against a TFR with a 40 kDa fragment of Pseudomonas exotoxin (PE). In humans, the administration of other TFR-targeted immunotoxins intrathecally led to inflammation and vascular leakage. We proposed that for treatment of DCIS, intraductal (i.duc) injection of HB21(Fv)-PE40 could avoid systemic toxicity while retaining its potent antitumor effects on visible and occult tumors in the entire ductal tree. Pharmacokinetic studies in mice showed that, in contrast to intravenous injection, IT was undetectable by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in blood following i.duc injection of up to 3.0 μg HB21(Fv)-PE40. We demonstrated the antitumor efficacy of HB21(Fv)-PE40 in two mammary-in-duct (MIND) models, MCF7 and SUM225, grown in NOD/SCID/gamma mice. Tumors were undetectable by In Vivo Imaging System (IVIS) imaging in intraductally treated mice within 1 wk of initiation of the regimen (IT once weekly/3 wk, 1.5 μg/teat). MCF7 tumor-bearing mice remained tumor free for up to 60 d of observation with i.duc IT, whereas the HB21 antibody alone or intraperitoneal IT treatment had minimal/no antitumor effects. These and similar findings in the SUM225 MIND model were substantiated by analysis of mammary gland whole mounts, histology, and immunohistochemistry for the proteins Ki67, CD31, CD71 (TFR), and Ku80. This study provides a strong preclinical foundation for conducting feasibility and safety trials in patients with stage 0 breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guannan Wang
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007
| | - Alok Kumar
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Wanjun Ding
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287
- Department of Oncology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China
| | - Preethi Korangath
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Tapan Bera
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Junxia Wei
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Priya Pai
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Kathleen Gabrielson
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287
- Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205
| | - Ira Pastan
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Saraswati Sukumar
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rebbeck CA, Xian J, Bornelöv S, Geradts J, Hobeika A, Geiger H, Alvarez JF, Rozhkova E, Nicholls A, Robine N, Lyerly HK, Hannon GJ. Gene expression signatures of individual ductal carcinoma in situ lesions identify processes and biomarkers associated with progression towards invasive ductal carcinoma. Nat Commun 2022; 13:3399. [PMID: 35697697 PMCID: PMC9192778 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30573-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is considered a non-invasive precursor to breast cancer, and although associated with an increased risk of developing invasive disease, many women with DCIS will never progress beyond their in situ diagnosis. The path from normal duct to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) is not well understood, and efforts to do so are hampered by the substantial heterogeneity that exists between patients, and even within patients. Here we show gene expression analysis from > 2,000 individually micro-dissected ductal lesions representing 145 patients. Combining all samples into one continuous trajectory we show there is a progressive loss in basal layer integrity heading towards IDC, coupled with two epithelial to mesenchymal transitions, one early and a second coinciding with the convergence of DCIS and IDC expression profiles. We identify early processes and potential biomarkers, including CAMK2N1, MNX1, ADCY5, HOXC11 and ANKRD22, whose reduced expression is associated with the progression of DCIS to invasive breast cancer. Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) remains poorly understood. Here, the authors analyse over 2700 micro-dissected samples using transcriptomics to identify genes that characterise different stages of DCIS to IDC progression, and identify IDC-associated markers within early-stage lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare A Rebbeck
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Jian Xian
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Susanne Bornelöv
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joseph Geradts
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Amy Hobeika
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Jose Franco Alvarez
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Elena Rozhkova
- Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ashley Nicholls
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Herbert K Lyerly
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Gregory J Hannon
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Acevedo DS, Fang WB, Rao V, Penmetcha V, Leyva H, Acosta G, Cote P, Brodine R, Swerdlow R, Tan L, Lorenzi PL, Cheng N. Regulation of growth, invasion and metabolism of breast ductal carcinoma through CCL2/CCR2 signaling interactions with MET receptor tyrosine kinases. Neoplasia 2022; 28:100791. [PMID: 35405500 PMCID: PMC9010752 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2022.100791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
CCR2 correlates with MET receptor expression in breast ductal carcinomas. CCL2/CCR2 signaling in breast cancer cells depend on interactions with MET. CCR2 and MET signals alter metabolism of ductal carcinoma in situ in animal models. CCR2 mediates metabolism and progression of MIND lesions through MET.
With over 60,000 cases diagnosed annually in the US, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the most prevalent form of early-stage breast cancer. Because many DCIS cases never progress to invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC), overtreatment remains a significant problem. Up to 20% patients experience disease recurrence, indicating that standard treatments do not effectively treat DCIS for a subset of patients. By understanding the mechanisms of DCIS progression, we can develop new treatment strategies better tailored to patients. The chemokine CCL2 and its receptor CCR2 are known to regulate macrophage recruitment during inflammation and cancer progression. Recent studies indicate that increased CCL2/CCR2 signaling in breast epithelial cells enhance formation of IDC. Here, we characterized the molecular mechanisms important for CCL2/CCR2-mediated DCIS progression. Phospho-protein array profiling revealed that CCL2 stimulated phosphorylation of MET receptor tyrosine kinases in breast cancer cells. Co-immunoprecipitation and proximity ligation assays demonstrated that CCL2-induced MET activity depended on interactions with CCR2 and SRC. Extracellular flux analysis and biochemical assays revealed that CCL2/CCR2 signaling in breast cancer cells enhanced glycolytic enzyme expression and activity. CRISPR knockout and pharmacologic inhibition of MET revealed that CCL2/CCR2-induced breast cancer cell proliferation, survival, migration and glycolysis through MET-dependent mechanisms. In animals, MET inhibitors blocked CCR2-mediated DCIS progression and metabolism. CCR2 and MET were significantly co-expressed in patient DCIS and IDC tissues. In summary, MET receptor activity is an important mechanism for CCL2/CCR2-mediated progression and metabolism of early-stage breast cancer, with important clinical implications.
Collapse
|
17
|
Bertok T, Pinkova Gajdosova V, Bertokova A, Svecova N, Kasak P, Tkac J. Breast cancer glycan biomarkers: their link to tumour cell metabolism and their perspectives in clinical practice. Expert Rev Proteomics 2021; 18:881-910. [PMID: 34711108 DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2021.1996231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer (BCa) is the most common cancer type diagnosed in women and 5th most common cause of deaths among all cancer deaths despite the fact that screening program is at place. This is why novel diagnostics approaches are needed in order to decrease number of BCa cases and disease mortality. AREAS COVERED In this review paper, we aim to cover some basic aspects regarding cellular metabolism and signalling in BCa behind altered glycosylation. We also discuss novel exciting discoveries regarding glycan-based analysis, which can provide useful information for better understanding of the disease. The final part deals with clinical usefulness of glycan-based biomarkers and the clinical performance of such biomarkers is compared to already approved BCa biomarkers and diagnostic tools based on imaging. EXPERT OPINION Recent discoveries suggest that glycan-based biomarkers offer high accuracy for possible BCa diagnostics in blood, but also for better monitoring and management of BCa patients. The review article was written using Web of Science search engine to include articles published between 2019 and 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Bertok
- Glycanostics Ltd., Bratislava, Slovak Republic.,Department of Glycobiotechnology, Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Veronika Pinkova Gajdosova
- Department of Glycobiotechnology, Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | | | - Natalia Svecova
- Department of Glycobiotechnology, Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Peter Kasak
- Center for Advanced Materials, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| | - Jan Tkac
- Glycanostics Ltd., Bratislava, Slovak Republic.,Department of Glycobiotechnology, Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Brugnoli F, Tedeschi P, Grassilli S, Maietti A, Brandolini V, Bertagnolo V. Ethanol-based garlic extract prevents malignant evolution of non-invasive breast tumor cells induced by moderate hypoxia. Biomed Pharmacother 2021; 142:112052. [PMID: 34426261 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In breast cancer, low oxygen availability is associated with a more aggressive phenotype and with malignant evolution of non-invasive cells. Natural compounds have long attracted attention in cancer treatment, and in recent years garlic (Allium sativum) organosulfur derivatives have been shown to negatively affect growth and invasion of tumor cells. METHODS Homemade ethanol-based garlic extract (GE) was administered to MCF7 and MCF10DCIS breast tumor cell lines grown under moderate hypoxia. Cell cycle, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell markers were evaluated. RESULTS We revealed that, in the non-invasive MCF10DCIS cells but not in the post-EMT MCF7 cells, low oxygen availability induced the decrease of E-cadherin and the increase of vimentin and motility, that were prevented by GE administration. In both cell lines, treatment with GE counteracted the up-modulation of CD133 positive cells induced by hypoxia. CONCLUSIONS Overall, our data firstly revealed anti-cancer properties of garlic in non-invasive breast cancer cells. In particular, they demonstrated a protective role of this natural product against the hypoxia-induced increase of molecules that play crucial roles in tumor evolution, suggesting that garlic derivatives can be considered in new approaches for preventing progression of breast tumors from non-invasive to infiltrating lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Brugnoli
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Paola Tedeschi
- Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences (DOCPAS), University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Silvia Grassilli
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Annalisa Maietti
- Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences (DOCPAS), University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Brandolini
- Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences (DOCPAS), University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Valeria Bertagnolo
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Karakatsanis A, Charalampoudis P, Pistioli L, Di Micco R, Foukakis T, Valachis A. Axillary evaluation in ductal cancer in situ of the breast: challenging the diagnostic accuracy of clinical practice guidelines. Br J Surg 2021; 108:1120-1125. [PMID: 34089583 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Staging of the axilla is not routine in ductal cancer in situ (DCIS) although invasive cancer is observed in 20-25 per cent of patients at final pathology. Upfront sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) is advocated in clinical practice guidelines in certain situations. These include expected challenges in subsequent SLN detection and when the risk for invasion is high. Clinical practice guidelines are, however, inconsistent and lead to considerable practice variability. METHODS Clinical practice guidelines for upfront SLND in DCIS were identified and applied to patients included in the prospective SentiNot study. These patients were evaluated by six independent, blinded raters. Agreement statistics were performed to assess agreement and concordance. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed, to assess guideline accuracy in identifying patients with underlying invasion. RESULTS Eight guidelines with relevant recommendations were identified. Interobserver agreement varied greatly (kappa: 0.23-0.9) and the interpretation as to whether SLND should be performed ranged from 40-90 per cent and with varying concordance (32-88 per cent). The diagnostic accuracy was low with area under the curve ranging from 0.45 to 0.55. Fifty to 90 per cent of patients with pure DCIS would undergo unnecessary SLNB, whereas 10-50 per cent of patients with invasion were not identified as 'high risk'. Agreement across guidelines was low (kappa = 0.24), meaning that different patients had a similar risk of being treated inaccurately. CONCLUSION Available guidelines are inaccurate in identifying patients with DCIS who would benefit from upfront SLNB. Guideline refinement with detailed preoperative work-up and novel techniques for SLND identification could address this challenge and avoid overtreatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Karakatsanis
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Lida Pistioli
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Rosa Di Micco
- Breast Unit, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Theodoros Foukakis
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.,Breast Centre, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Antonios Valachis
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine & Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Xu H, Lien T, Bergholtz H, Fleischer T, Djerroudi L, Vincent-Salomon A, Sørlie T, Aittokallio T. Multi-Omics Marker Analysis Enables Early Prediction of Breast Tumor Progression. Front Genet 2021; 12:670749. [PMID: 34149812 PMCID: PMC8209521 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.670749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a preinvasive form of breast cancer with a highly variable potential of becoming invasive and affecting mortality of the patients. Due to the lack of accurate markers of disease progression, many women with detected DCIS are currently overtreated. To distinguish those DCIS cases who are likely to require therapy from those who should be left untreated, there is a need for robust and predictive biomarkers extracted from molecular or genetic profiles. We developed a supervised machine learning approach that implements multi-omics feature selection and model regularization for the identification of biomarker combinations that could be used to distinguish low-risk DCIS lesions from those with a higher likelihood of progression. To investigate the genetic heterogeneity of disease progression, we applied this approach to 40 pure DCIS and 259 invasive breast cancer (IBC) samples profiled with genome-wide transcriptomics, DNA methylation, and DNA copy number variation. Feature selection using the multi-omics Lasso-regularized algorithm identified both known genes involved in breast cancer development, as well as novel markers for early detection. Even though the gene expression-based model features led to the highest classification accuracy alone, methylation data provided a complementary source of features and improved especially the sensitivity of correctly classifying DCIS cases. We also identified a number of repeatedly misclassified DCIS cases when using either the expression or methylation markers. A small panel of 10 gene markers was able to distinguish DCIS and IBC cases with high accuracy in nested cross-validation (AU-ROC = 0.99). The marker panel was not specific to any of the established breast cancer subtypes, suggesting that the 10-gene signature may provide a subtype-agnostic and cost-effective approach for breast cancer detection and patient stratification. We further confirmed high accuracy of the 10-gene signature in an external validation cohort (AU-ROC = 0.95), profiled using distinct transcriptomic assay, hence demonstrating robustness of the risk signature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haifeng Xu
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology (OCBE), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tonje Lien
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helga Bergholtz
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas Fleischer
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lounes Djerroudi
- Institut Curie, Ensemble Hospitalier, Pôle de Médecine Diagnostique et Théranostique, Département de Pathologie, Paris, France
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Institut Curie, Ensemble Hospitalier, Pôle de Médecine Diagnostique et Théranostique, Département de Pathologie, Paris, France
| | - Therese Sørlie
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tero Aittokallio
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology (OCBE), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|