1
|
Hou R, Lo JY, Marks JR, Hwang ES, Grimm LJ. Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0282402. [PMID: 38324545 PMCID: PMC10849231 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the performance bias caused by sampling data into training and test sets in a mammography radiomics study. METHODS Mammograms from 700 women were used to study upstaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. The dataset was repeatedly shuffled and split into training (n = 400) and test cases (n = 300) forty times. For each split, cross-validation was used for training, followed by an assessment of the test set. Logistic regression with regularization and support vector machine were used as the machine learning classifiers. For each split and classifier type, multiple models were created based on radiomics and/or clinical features. RESULTS Area under the curve (AUC) performances varied considerably across the different data splits (e.g., radiomics regression model: train 0.58-0.70, test 0.59-0.73). Performances for regression models showed a tradeoff where better training led to worse testing and vice versa. Cross-validation over all cases reduced this variability, but required samples of 500+ cases to yield representative estimates of performance. CONCLUSIONS In medical imaging, clinical datasets are often limited to relatively small size. Models built from different training sets may not be representative of the whole dataset. Depending on the selected data split and model, performance bias could lead to inappropriate conclusions that might influence the clinical significance of the findings. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Performance bias can result from model testing when using limited datasets. Optimal strategies for test set selection should be developed to ensure study conclusions are appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Hou
- Department of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Joseph Y. Lo
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey R. Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - E. Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Lars J. Grimm
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davidson NR, Barnard ME, Hippen AA, Campbell A, Johnson CE, Way GP, Dalley BK, Berchuck A, Salas LA, Peres LC, Marks JR, Schildkraut JM, Greene CS, Doherty JA. Molecular subtypes of high-grade serous ovarian cancer across racial groups and gene expression platforms. bioRxiv 2023:2023.11.01.565179. [PMID: 37961178 PMCID: PMC10635053 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.01.565179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Introduction High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) gene expression subtypes are associated with differential survival. We characterized HGSC gene expression in Black individuals and considered whether gene expression differences by race may contribute to poorer HGSC survival among Black versus non-Hispanic White individuals. Methods We included newly generated RNA-Seq data from Black and White individuals, and array-based genotyping data from four existing studies of White and Japanese individuals. We assigned subtypes using K-means clustering. Cluster- and dataset-specific gene expression patterns were summarized by moderated t-scores. We compared cluster-specific gene expression patterns across datasets by calculating the correlation between the summarized vectors of moderated t-scores. Following mapping to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-derived HGSC subtypes, we used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate subtype-specific survival by dataset. Results Cluster-specific gene expression was similar across gene expression platforms. Comparing the Black study population to the White and Japanese study populations, the immunoreactive subtype was more common (39% versus 23%-28%) and the differentiated subtype less common (7% versus 22%-31%). Patterns of subtype-specific survival were similar between the Black and White populations with RNA-Seq data; compared to mesenchymal cases, the risk of death was similar for proliferative and differentiated cases and suggestively lower for immunoreactive cases (Black population HR=0.79 [0.55, 1.13], White population HR=0.86 [0.62, 1.19]). Conclusions A single, platform-agnostic pipeline can be used to assign HGSC gene expression subtypes. While the observed prevalence of HGSC subtypes varied by race, subtype-specific survival was similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie R. Davidson
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Mollie E. Barnard
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and the Department of Population Health Sciences at the Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ariel A. Hippen
- Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amy Campbell
- Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Courtney E. Johnson
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Gregory P. Way
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Brian K. Dalley
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Lucas A. Salas
- Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Lauren C. Peres
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jeffrey R. Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Joellen M. Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Casey S. Greene
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer A. Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and the Department of Population Health Sciences at the Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ryser MD, Greenwald MA, Sorribes IC, King LM, Hall A, Geradts J, Weaver DL, Mallo D, Holloway S, Monyak D, Gumbert G, Vaez-Ghaemi S, Wu E, Murgas K, Grimm LJ, Maley CC, Marks JR, Shibata D, Hwang ES. Growth Dynamics of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Recapitulate Normal Breast Development. bioRxiv 2023:2023.10.01.560370. [PMID: 37873488 PMCID: PMC10592867 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.01.560370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast cancer share many morphologic, proteomic, and genomic alterations. Yet in contrast to invasive cancer, many DCIS tumors do not progress and may remain indolent over decades. To better understand the heterogenous nature of this disease, we reconstructed the growth dynamics of 18 DCIS tumors based on the geo-spatial distribution of their somatic mutations. The somatic mutation topographies revealed that DCIS is multiclonal and consists of spatially discontinuous subclonal lesions. Here we show that this pattern of spread is consistent with a new 'Comet' model of DCIS tumorigenesis, whereby multiple subclones arise early and nucleate the buds of the growing tumor. The discontinuous, multiclonal growth of the Comet model is analogous to the branching morphogenesis of normal breast development that governs the rapid expansion of the mammary epithelium during puberty. The branching morphogenesis-like dynamics of the proposed Comet model diverges from the canonical model of clonal evolution, and better explains observed genomic spatial data. Importantly, the Comet model allows for the clinically relevant scenario of extensive DCIS spread, without being subjected to the selective pressures of subclone competition that promote the emergence of increasingly invasive phenotypes. As such, the normal cell movement inferred during DCIS growth provides a new explanation for the limited risk of progression in DCIS and adds biologic rationale for ongoing clinical efforts to reduce DCIS overtreatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc D. Ryser
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Lorraine M. King
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Allison Hall
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Joseph Geradts
- Department of Pathology, East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Donald L. Weaver
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont and UVM Cancer Center, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Diego Mallo
- Arizona Cancer Evolution Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
- Biodesign Center for Biocomputing, Security and Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Shannon Holloway
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Monyak
- Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Graham Gumbert
- Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Ethan Wu
- Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Kevin Murgas
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Lars J. Grimm
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Carlo C. Maley
- Arizona Cancer Evolution Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
- Biodesign Center for Biocomputing, Security and Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Jeffrey R. Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Darryl Shibata
- Department of Pathology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - E. Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Johnson CE, Alberg AJ, Bandera EV, Peres LC, Akonde M, Collin LJ, Cote ML, Hastert TA, Hébert JR, Peters ES, Qin B, Terry P, Schwartz AG, Bondy M, Epstein MP, Mandle HB, Marks JR, Lawson AB, Schildkraut JM. Association of inflammation-related exposures and ovarian cancer survival in a multi-site cohort study of Black women. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:1119-1125. [PMID: 37537254 PMCID: PMC10539498 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02385-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An association was observed between an inflammation-related risk score (IRRS) and worse overall survival (OS) among a cohort of mostly White women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Herein, we evaluated the association between the IRRS and OS among Black women with EOC, a population with higher frequencies of pro-inflammatory exposures and worse survival. METHODS The analysis included 592 Black women diagnosed with EOC from the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES). Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of the IRRS and OS, adjusting for relevant covariates. Additional inflammation-related exposures, including the energy-adjusted Dietary Inflammatory Index (E-DIITM), were evaluated. RESULTS A dose-response trend was observed showing higher IRRS was associated with worse OS (per quartile HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.22). Adding the E-DII to the model attenuated the association of IRRS with OS, and increasing E-DII, indicating a more pro-inflammatory diet, was associated with shorter OS (per quartile HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.24). Scoring high on both indices was associated with shorter OS (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.16-2.06). CONCLUSION Higher levels of inflammation-related exposures were associated with decreased EOC OS among Black women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney E Johnson
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Anthony J Alberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Cancer and Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Lauren C Peres
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Maxwell Akonde
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Lindsay J Collin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Michele L Cote
- Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Theresa A Hastert
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - James R Hébert
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Edward S Peters
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Bonnie Qin
- Cancer and Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Paul Terry
- Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Ann G Schwartz
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Melissa Bondy
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Michael P Epstein
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Hannah B Mandle
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Andrew B Lawson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Usher Institute, School of Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ren Y, Liu X, Ge J, Liang Z, Xu X, Grimm LJ, Go J, Marks JR, Lo JY. Ipsilateral Lesion Detection Refinement for Tomosynthesis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2023; 42:3080-3090. [PMID: 37227903 PMCID: PMC11033619 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2023.3280135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Computer-aided detection (CAD) frameworks for breast cancer screening have been researched for several decades. Early adoption of deep-learning models in CAD frameworks has shown greatly improved detection performance compared to traditional CAD on single-view images. Recently, studies have improved performance by merging information from multiple views within each screening exam. Clinically, the integration of lesion correspondence during screening is a complicated decision process that depends on the correct execution of several referencing steps. However, most multi-view CAD frameworks are deep-learning-based black-box techniques. Fully end-to-end designs make it very difficult to analyze model behaviors and fine-tune performance. More importantly, the black-box nature of the techniques discourages clinical adoption due to the lack of explicit reasoning for each multi-view referencing step. Therefore, there is a need for a multi-view detection framework that can not only detect cancers accurately but also provide step-by-step, multi-view reasoning. In this work, we present Ipsilateral-Matching-Refinement Networks (IMR-Net) for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) lesion detection across multiple views. Our proposed framework adaptively refines the single-view detection scores based on explicit ipsilateral lesion matching. IMR-Net is built on a robust, single-view detection CAD pipeline with a commercial development DBT dataset of 24675 DBT volumetric views from 8034 exams. Performance is measured using location-based, case-level receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and case-level free-response ROC (FROC) analysis.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang K, Kumar T, Wang J, Minussi DC, Sei E, Li J, Tran TM, Thennavan A, Hu M, Casasent AK, Xiao Z, Bai S, Yang L, King LM, Shah V, Kristel P, van der Borden CL, Marks JR, Zhao Y, Zurita AJ, Aparicio A, Chapin B, Ye J, Zhang J, Gibbons DL, Sawyer E, Thompson AM, Futreal A, Hwang ES, Wesseling J, Lips EH, Navin NE. Archival single-cell genomics reveals persistent subclones during DCIS progression. Cell 2023; 186:3968-3982.e15. [PMID: 37586362 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a common precursor of invasive breast cancer. Our understanding of its genomic progression to recurrent disease remains poor, partly due to challenges associated with the genomic profiling of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) materials. Here, we developed Arc-well, a high-throughput single-cell DNA-sequencing method that is compatible with FFPE materials. We validated our method by profiling 40,330 single cells from cell lines, a frozen tissue, and 27 FFPE samples from breast, lung, and prostate tumors stored for 3-31 years. Analysis of 10 patients with matched DCIS and cancers that recurred 2-16 years later show that many primary DCIS had already undergone whole-genome doubling and clonal diversification and that they shared genomic lineages with persistent subclones in the recurrences. Evolutionary analysis suggests that most DCIS cases in our cohort underwent an evolutionary bottleneck, and further identified chromosome aberrations in the persistent subclones that were associated with recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaile Wang
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Tapsi Kumar
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; MD Anderson UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genomic Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Junke Wang
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; MD Anderson UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Darlan Conterno Minussi
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; MD Anderson UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Emi Sei
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jianzhuo Li
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Tuan M Tran
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Aatish Thennavan
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Min Hu
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Anna K Casasent
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Zhenna Xiao
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Shanshan Bai
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lei Yang
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; MD Anderson UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lorraine M King
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27707, USA
| | - Vandna Shah
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - Petra Kristel
- Division of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Carolien L van der Borden
- Division of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27707, USA
| | - Yuehui Zhao
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Amado J Zurita
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ana Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brian Chapin
- Department of Urology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jie Ye
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; MD Anderson UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jianjun Zhang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Don L Gibbons
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ellinor Sawyer
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - Alastair M Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Andrew Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - E Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27707, USA
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam 1066 CX, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZC, the Netherlands
| | - Esther H Lips
- Department of Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam 1066 CX, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZC, the Netherlands
| | - Nicholas E Navin
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; MD Anderson UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Bioinformatics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Strand SH, Rivero-Gutiérrez B, Houlahan KE, Seoane JA, King LM, Risom T, Simpson LA, Vennam S, Khan A, Cisneros L, Hardman T, Harmon B, Couch F, Gallagher K, Kilgore M, We S, DeMichele A, King T, McAuliffe PF, Nangia J, Lee J, Tseng J, Storniolo AM, Thompson AM, Gupta GP, Burns R, Veis DJ, DeSchryver K, Zhu C, Matusiak M, Wang J, Zhu SX, Tappenden J, Ding DY, Zhang D, Luo J, Jiang S, Varma S, Anderson L, Straub C, Srivastava S, Curtis C, Tibshirani R, Angelo RM, Hall A, Owzar K, Polyak K, Maley C, Marks JR, Colditz GA, Shelley Hwang E, West RB. Molecular classification and biomarkers of clinical outcome in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: Analysis of TBCRC 038 and RAHBT cohorts. Cancer Cell 2023; 41:1381. [PMID: 37433282 PMCID: PMC10416265 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
|
8
|
Hou R, Lo JY, Marks JR, Hwang ES, Grimm LJ. Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset. medRxiv 2023:2023.02.15.23285985. [PMID: 36865183 PMCID: PMC9980247 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.15.23285985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To assess the performance bias caused by sampling data into training and test sets in a mammography radiomics study. Methods Mammograms from 700 women were used to study upstaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. The dataset was repeatedly shuffled and split into training (n=400) and test cases (n=300) forty times. For each split, cross-validation was used for training, followed by an assessment of the test set. Logistic regression with regularization and support vector machine were used as the machine learning classifiers. For each split and classifier type, multiple models were created based on radiomics and/or clinical features. Results Area under the curve (AUC) performances varied considerably across the different data splits (e.g., radiomics regression model: train 0.58-0.70, test 0.59-0.73). Performances for regression models showed a tradeoff where better training led to worse testing and vice versa. Cross-validation over all cases reduced this variability, but required samples of 500+ cases to yield representative estimates of performance. Conclusions In medical imaging, clinical datasets are often limited to relatively small size. Models built from different training sets may not be representative of the whole dataset. Depending on the selected data split and model, performance bias could lead to inappropriate conclusions that might influence the clinical significance of the findings. Optimal strategies for test set selection should be developed to ensure study conclusions are appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Hou
- Department of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, USA
| | - Joseph Y Lo
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, USA
| | - E Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, USA
| | - Lars J Grimm
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sun C, Ye Y, Tan Z, Liu Y, Li Y, Hu W, Liang K, Egranov SD, Huang LA, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Yao J, Nguyen TK, Zhao Z, Wu A, Marks JR, Caudle AS, Sahin AA, Gao J, Gammon ST, Piwnica-Worms D, Hu J, Chiao PJ, Yu D, Hung MC, Curran MA, Calin GA, Ying H, Han L, Lin C, Yang L. Tumor-associated nonmyelinating Schwann cell-expressed PVT1 promotes pancreatic cancer kynurenine pathway and tumor immune exclusion. Sci Adv 2023; 9:eadd6995. [PMID: 36724291 PMCID: PMC9891701 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.add6995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
One of the major obstacles to treating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is its immunoresistant microenvironment. The functional importance and molecular mechanisms of Schwann cells in PDAC remains largely elusive. We characterized the gene signature of tumor-associated nonmyelinating Schwann cells (TASc) in PDAC and indicated that the abundance of TASc was correlated with immune suppressive tumor microenvironment and the unfavorable outcome of patients with PDAC. Depletion of pancreatic-specific TASc promoted the tumorigenesis of PDAC tumors. TASc-expressed long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) plasmacytoma variant translocation 1 (PVT1) was triggered by the tumor cell-produced interleukin-6. Mechanistically, PVT1 modulated RAF proto-oncogene serine/threonine protein kinase-mediated phosphorylation of tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase in TASc, facilitating its enzymatic activities in catalysis of tryptophan to kynurenine. Depletion of TASc-expressed PVT1 suppressed PDAC tumor growth. Furthermore, depletion of TASc using a small-molecule inhibitor effectively sensitized PDAC to immunotherapy, signifying the important roles of TASc in PDAC immune resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengcao Sun
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Youqiong Ye
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Zhi Tan
- Center for Drug Discovery, Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yuan Liu
- Center for Epigenetics and Disease Prevention, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yajuan Li
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Wei Hu
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201620, China
| | - Ke Liang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sergey D. Egranov
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lisa Angela Huang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Zhao Zhang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yaohua Zhang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jun Yao
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Tina K. Nguyen
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Zilong Zhao
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Andrew Wu
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jeffrey R. Marks
- Division of Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Duke University, School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Abigail S. Caudle
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Aysegul A. Sahin
- Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jianjun Gao
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Seth T. Gammon
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - David Piwnica-Worms
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jian Hu
- Department of Cancer Biology, Division of Basic Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Paul J. Chiao
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Dihua Yu
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mien-Chie Hung
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Research Center for Cancer Biology, and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
- Department of Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung 413, Taiwan
| | - Michael A. Curran
- The Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - George A. Calin
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Center for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNAs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Haoqiang Ying
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Leng Han
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Center for Epigenetics and Disease Prevention, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Chunru Lin
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Liuqing Yang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Center for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNAs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Strand SH, Rivero-Gutiérrez B, Houlahan KE, Seoane JA, King LM, Risom T, Simpson LA, Vennam S, Khan A, Cisneros L, Hardman T, Harmon B, Couch F, Gallagher K, Kilgore M, Wei S, DeMichele A, King T, McAuliffe PF, Nangia J, Lee J, Tseng J, Storniolo AM, Thompson AM, Gupta GP, Burns R, Veis DJ, DeSchryver K, Zhu C, Matusiak M, Wang J, Zhu SX, Tappenden J, Ding DY, Zhang D, Luo J, Jiang S, Varma S, Anderson L, Straub C, Srivastava S, Curtis C, Tibshirani R, Angelo RM, Hall A, Owzar K, Polyak K, Maley C, Marks JR, Colditz GA, Hwang ES, West RB. Molecular classification and biomarkers of clinical outcome in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: Analysis of TBCRC 038 and RAHBT cohorts. Cancer Cell 2022; 40:1521-1536.e7. [PMID: 36400020 PMCID: PMC9772081 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the most common precursor of invasive breast cancer (IBC), with variable propensity for progression. We perform multiscale, integrated molecular profiling of DCIS with clinical outcomes by analyzing 774 DCIS samples from 542 patients with 7.3 years median follow-up from the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium 038 study and the Resource of Archival Breast Tissue cohorts. We identify 812 genes associated with ipsilateral recurrence within 5 years from treatment and develop a classifier that predicts DCIS or IBC recurrence in both cohorts. Pathways associated with recurrence include proliferation, immune response, and metabolism. Distinct stromal expression patterns and immune cell compositions are identified. Our multiscale approach employed in situ methods to generate a spatially resolved atlas of breast precancers, where complementary modalities can be directly compared and correlated with conventional pathology findings, disease states, and clinical outcome.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Female
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/genetics
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Disease Progression
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Biomarkers
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siri H Strand
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Belén Rivero-Gutiérrez
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Kathleen E Houlahan
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Jose A Seoane
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lorraine M King
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Tyler Risom
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Lunden A Simpson
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Sujay Vennam
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Aziz Khan
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Luis Cisneros
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
| | - Timothy Hardman
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Bryan Harmon
- Department of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467, USA; TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Fergus Couch
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA
| | - Kristalyn Gallagher
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Mark Kilgore
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Shi Wei
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Angela DeMichele
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Tari King
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Priscilla F McAuliffe
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Julie Nangia
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX 77030, USA
| | - Joanna Lee
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jennifer Tseng
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Anna Maria Storniolo
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Alastair M Thompson
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX 77030, USA; Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Gaorav P Gupta
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Robyn Burns
- TBCRC Loco-Regional Working Group, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; TBCRC, The EMMES Corporation, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Deborah J Veis
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA; Departments of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Katherine DeSchryver
- Departments of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Chunfang Zhu
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Magdalena Matusiak
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Jason Wang
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Shirley X Zhu
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Jen Tappenden
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Daisy Yi Ding
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Dadong Zhang
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Jingqin Luo
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Shu Jiang
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Sushama Varma
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Lauren Anderson
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Cody Straub
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Sucheta Srivastava
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Christina Curtis
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Medicine and Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Rob Tibshirani
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Robert Michael Angelo
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Allison Hall
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Kouros Owzar
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA; Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Kornelia Polyak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Carlo Maley
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Graham A Colditz
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - E Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
| | - Robert B West
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Escorza MR, Sheinman M, Bismeijer T, Ahmed AA, Shah V, Marks JR, King LM, Megalios A, Visser LL, Hoogstrat M, Davies HR, Kumar T, Collyar D, Stobart H, Pinder S, Navin NN, Futreal A, Nik-Zainal S, Hwang ES, Lips EH, Thompson A, Wessels LF, Wesseling J, Sawyer EJ. Abstract PR002: Genomic predictor can discriminate between high- and low-risk DCIS. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1940-6215.dcis22-pr002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is considered a non-obligate precursor of invasive ductal carcinoma. With the aim of preventing a subsequent invasive cancer, all DCIS lesions are currently treated with surgical excision often supplemented with radiotherapy (RT). To prevent DCIS over- or undertreatment, a reliable marker of DCIS invasiveness risk is urgently needed. Methods: We studied two large DCIS cohorts: the Sloane cohort, a prospective breast screening cohort from the UK (median follow-up of 11 years), and a Dutch population-based cohort (NKI, median follow-up of 13 years). FFPE tissue specimens from patients with pure primary DCIS after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) +/- RT that did develop a subsequent ipsilateral event (DCIS or invasive) were considered as cases, whereas patients that did not develop any form of recurrence up to the last follow-up or death were considered as controls. We performed copy number analysis (CNA) and RNAseq analysis on 229 cases (80 DCIS only recurrences) and 344 controls. Results: DCIS was classified into the PAM50 subtypes using RNAseq data which revealed an enrichment of luminal A phenotype in DCIS that did not recur (P = 0.01, Fisher Exact test). No single copy number aberration was more common in cases compared to controls. RNAseq data did not reveal any genes significantly over/under-expressed in cases versus controls after FDR correction. However, by limiting the analysis to samples that had not had RT and excluding pure DCIS recurrences, we could develop a penalized Cox model from RNAseq data. The model was trained on weighted samples (to correct for the biased sampling of the case-control dataset) from the NKI series with double loop cross-validation. The genes were selected using the Elastic net framework of penalization. Using this predicted hazard ratio, the samples were split into high, medium, and low-risk quantiles, with a recurrence risk of 23%, 7% and 2%, respectively at 5 years (p = 10-10, Wald test). The NKI-trained predictor was independently validated in the Sloane No RT no DCIS recurrence cohort (p = 0.02, Wald test). GSEA analysis revealed proliferation hallmarks enriched in the recurrence predictor (FDR = 0.058). The RNAseq predictor was more predictive of recurrence than PAM50, clinical features (Grade, Her2 and ER) and the 12-gene Oncotype DCIS score (p < 0.001, permutation test using the Wald statistic) in both the NKI and Sloane series. Conclusion: Genomic profiling of two independent series of DCIS with outcome data did not reveal any clear associations with recurrence until analysis was limited to a set of samples who had not had radiotherapy and DCIS recurrences were excluded. We then identified an RNAseq-based classifier that could differentiate primary DCIS in low-, medium-, and high-risk groups, and validated it in an independent cohort. This classifier, if validated in other datasets, will allow us to identify women who do not need intensive treatment for their DCIS.
Citation Format: Maria Roman Escorza, Michael Sheinman, Tycho Bismeijer, Ahmed A. Ahmed, Vandna Shah, Jeffrey R. Marks, Lorraine M. King, Anargyros Megalios, Lindy L. Visser, Marlous Hoogstrat, Helen R. Davies, Tapsi Kumar, Deborah Collyar, Hilary Stobart, Sarah Pinder, Nicholas N. Navin, Andrew Futreal, Serena Nik-Zainal, E. Shelley Hwang, Esther H. Lips, Alastair Thompson, Lodewyk F.A. Wessels, Jelle Wesseling, Elinor J. Sawyer. Genomic predictor can discriminate between high- and low-risk DCIS [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Rethinking DCIS: An Opportunity for Prevention?; 2022 Sep 8-11; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2022;15(12 Suppl_1): Abstract nr PR002.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Vandna Shah
- 1King's College London, London, United Kingdom,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tapsi Kumar
- 5The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | | | - Hilary Stobart
- 7Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom,
| | | | | | - Andrew Futreal
- 5The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wallace EN, Grimsley G, Strand SH, Angelo RM, Colditz G, Hwang ES, West R, Marks JR, Angel PM, Drake RR. Abstract PR010: Characterizing N-glycan profiles of DCIS progression using tissue imaging MALDI mass spectrometry. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1940-6215.dcis22-pr010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Identifying distinct biomarkers of DCIS and determining the invasive potential of DCIS are of great clinical importance. N-linked glycans present on the cell surface of DCIS lesions and surrounding stroma are potential biomarkers of disease and tissue, but remain largely unexplored. An N-glycan targeted imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) approach was initiated to identify N-glycans associated with DCIS and progression in clinical FFPE tissues. A cohort of pathologist annotated DCIS and IDC tissues with a range of disease severity as well as the RAHBT TMA DCIS cohort were evaluated. The RAHBT cohort contains primary DCIS lesions with known long-term outcomes and serves as a good sample set to identify early markers indicating progressive potential, while the DCIS and IDC large tissue biopsies provide information on distinct glycan profiles when DCIS has progressed to IDC. Initially, tissue samples containing DCIS alone or both DCIS and IDC were processed for N-glycan MALDI-IMS analysis, the goal being to establish a consensus panel of each analyte and determine distinct profiles of DCIS when alone vs. when IDC was present. For N-glycans, a peak list of 54 N-glycans was selected for evaluation of each DCIS only tissue, as well as the mixed DCIS/IDC tissues. By highest intensity, the major DCIS-associated glycans were in the high-mannose and paucimannose structure categories. Additionally, a series of tri- and tetra-antennary multi-fucosylated glycans were also detected specifically in the DCIS lesions. In tissues containing both IDC and DCIS lesions, the high mannose glycans were also detected in the IDC regions, and GlcNAc-bisected glycans were seen elevated in these as compared to DCIS-only tissues. For samples in the RAHBT TMA cohort (progressors N=43; non-progressors N=78), the bisected N-glycans seen elevated with IDC were also seen to be significantly increased in the RAHBT samples that would eventually progress to IDC. Additional analyses to evaluate N-glycan isomer distributions for fucosylated and sialylated glycan species are also ongoing. The cumulative N-glycan data will be assessed with the extensive spatial genomic, transcriptomic and immunohistological data already generated for the same samples in the RAHBT cohort. This novel combination of multi-enzymatic digests with histopathology annotations represents an extensive multi-dimensional profile of DCIS and a novel tissue biomarker discovery approach.
Citation Format: Elizabeth N. Wallace, Grace Grimsley, Siri H. Strand, Robert Michael Angelo, Graham Colditz, E. Shelley Hwang, Robert West, Jeffrey R. Marks, Peggi M. Angel, Richard R. Drake. Characterizing N-glycan profiles of DCIS progression using tissue imaging MALDI mass spectrometry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Rethinking DCIS: An Opportunity for Prevention?; 2022 Sep 8-11; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2022;15(12 Suppl_1): Abstract nr PR010.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hulahan TS, Wallace EN, Strand SH, Angelo RM, Colditz G, Hwang ESS, West R, Spruill L, Marks JR, Drake RR, Angel PM. Abstract B019: Discrete regulation of the collagen proteome among pathological features in DCIS and invasive breast cancer by mass spectrometry tissue imaging. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1940-6215.dcis22-b019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is characterized by inter-tumor heterogeneity that poses a therapeutic challenge due to its unpredictable recurrence and progression to invasive breast cancer (IBC). In recent publications, collagen stromal differences have been reported between patients that progressed to IBC (progressors) and those that did not (non-progressors). However, details on the role spatial regulation of the collagen proteome might play in this progression have yet to be studied. Here, we investigated the pathological distribution of collagen post-translational modifications in a cohort of patients classified as progressors with ipsilateral IBC recurrence compared to non-progressors. Previously published methods for collagen proteomics by targeted tissue mass spectrometry imaging were used. The method reports collagen types and post-translational modifications within the collagen triple-helical region as well as approximately 40 other extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins involved in the regulation of collagen fibers. Initial studies investigated collagen variation in lumpectomies (n=7) with DCIS, DCIS plus invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) or IDC only. Over 590 peptides were found to be linked to annotated pathologies. A preliminary comparison of DCIS (n=2392 spectra) to IBC (n=4696 spectra) using area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) ≥0.85 demonstrated that 47 peptides could individually discriminate between DCIS and IBC in this limited cohort. Image segmentation of the 405,652 pixels demonstrated 11 high-level hierarchical groups designating unique spatially localized ECM proteomic groups; these groups overlaid with histopathological features and pathological annotations. A total of 87 samples from the Resource of Archival Breast Tissue (RAHBT) matched with clinical characteristics were also investigated. Cores were histologically diverse within the tissue microarrays, with cribriform, micropapillary, papillary, solid, and comedo necrosis architectural patterns. Initial results suggest certain peptides may differentiate between non-progressors and progressors with ipsilateral IBC recurrence. Our current work focuses on correlating collagen signatures to mixed pathologies and the cellular content of cores. Further investigation of the collagen proteome is warranted. Overall, the data suggest unique collagen signatures in DCIS that could be useful for understanding recurrence and progression to IBC.
Citation Format: Taylor S. Hulahan, Elizabeth N. Wallace, Siri H. Strand, Robert Michael Angelo, Graham Colditz, Eun-Sil Shelley Hwang, Robert West, Laura Spruill, Jeffrey R. Marks, Richard R. Drake, Peggi M. Angel. Discrete regulation of the collagen proteome among pathological features in DCIS and invasive breast cancer by mass spectrometry tissue imaging [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Rethinking DCIS: An Opportunity for Prevention?; 2022 Sep 8-11; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2022;15(12 Suppl_1): Abstract nr B019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Laura Spruill
- 1Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sobhani F, Muralidhar S, Hamidinekoo A, Hall AH, King LM, Marks JR, Maley C, Horlings HM, Hwang ES, Yuan Y. Spatial interplay of tissue hypoxia and T-cell regulation in ductal carcinoma in situ. NPJ Breast Cancer 2022; 8:105. [PMID: 36109587 PMCID: PMC9477879 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00419-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractHypoxia promotes aggressive tumor phenotypes and mediates the recruitment of suppressive T cells in invasive breast carcinomas. We investigated the role of hypoxia in relation to T-cell regulation in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We designed a deep learning system tailored for the tissue architecture complexity of DCIS, and compared pure DCIS cases with the synchronous DCIS and invasive components within invasive ductal carcinoma cases. Single-cell classification was applied in tandem with a new method for DCIS ductal segmentation in dual-stained CA9 and FOXP3, whole-tumor section digital pathology images. Pure DCIS typically has an intermediate level of colocalization of FOXP3+ and CA9+ cells, but in invasive carcinoma cases, the FOXP3+ (T-regulatory) cells may have relocated from the DCIS and into the invasive parts of the tumor, leading to high levels of colocalization in the invasive parts but low levels in the synchronous DCIS component. This may be due to invasive, hypoxic tumors evolving to recruit T-regulatory cells in order to evade immune predation. Our data support the notion that hypoxia promotes immune tolerance through recruitment of T-regulatory cells, and furthermore indicate a spatial pattern of relocalization of T-regulatory cells from DCIS to hypoxic tumor cells. Spatial colocalization of hypoxic and T-regulatory cells may be a key event and useful marker of DCIS progression.
Collapse
|
15
|
Ahmed AA, Roman-Escorza M, Bismeijer T, Sheinman M, Shah V, Shami R, Marks JR, King LM, Megalios A, Visser LL, Hoogstraat M, Davies HR, Kumar T, Collyar D, Stobart H, Pinder S, Navin NN, Futreal A, Nik-Zainal S, Hwang ES, Wessels LF, Lips EH, Thompson A, Wesseling J, Sawyer EJ. Abstract 5108: Copy number analysis of pure DCIS and association with recurrence. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-5108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
With the widespread adoption of breast cancer screening the incidence of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased. As DCIS is considered a non-obligate precursor of invasive ductal carcinoma most women with pure DCIS are treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) +/- radiotherapy. However, for many this is likely to be overtreatment as only a minority will develop a subsequent ipsilateral recurrence. Studies also show that only ~60% of these ipsilateral recurrences are invasive disease with the remainder being pure DCIS. To predict which women are most likely to benefit from interventions, there is a need to identify biomarkers that are associated with invasive recurrence. Our aim was to assess whether copy number aberrations (CNAs) could be used to identify DCIS that was likely to recur as invasive disease or remain recurrence-free during long-time follow up.
We performed somatic copy number profiling on 309 pure DCIS samples that had not developed an ipsilateral event (controls), 198 that had developed subsequent ipsilateral invasive disease (INV-cases) and 58 that had developed subsequent ipsilateral pure DCIS (DCIS-cases). The samples were obtained from two large nation-wide cohorts: the Sloane cohort, a prospective breast screening cohort from the UK with a median follow up of 12.5 years and a Dutch population based cohort, with a median follow up of 13 years. CNAs were assessed using the CytoSNP array or low pass whole genome sequencing and analyzed using GISTIC.
Integrative cluster (IntClust) subtyping revealed that only 5 subtypes were well represented in DCIS compared to 10 in invasive disease and the distribution of clusters between INV-cases and controls was similar with the exception of IntClust 4, which was significantly more common in controls (P= 0.025, Fishers exact test). IntClust 4 is characterized to have low levels of genomic instability and a CNA-devoid. INV-cases were globally more aberrant than controls (P = 0.006, Wilcoxon test) as assessed by the chromosomal instability index (CIN) score. GISTIC identified 17 recurrent amplifications, 21 recurrent gains and 22 recurrent losses in the whole cohort. Six of these regions were more common in INV-cases compared to controls: amplifications at 17q24.1 and 8p11.23, losses at 1p36.13 and 11q23.2 and gains at 17q21.33 and 16p (Nominal P < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1, Fishers exact test). Subgroup analysis of ER+, Her2- INV-cases versus controls revealed an additional differential CNA, amplification at 11q13.3 more common in cases.
DCIS-cases had similar CNAs to INV-cases and were more aberrant than controls in terms of CIN score (P < 0.037, Wilcoxon test) but not as aberrant as INV-cases.
In conclusion, we have identified potential CNAs that are associated with invasive recurrence. Further analysis will integrate gene expression with copy number data to identify which genes are being targeted by these CNAs in order to identify pathways important in progression of DCIS.
Citation Format: Ahmed A. Ahmed, Maria Roman-Escorza, Tycho Bismeijer, Michael Sheinman, Vandna Shah, Rana Shami, Jeffrey R. Marks, Lorraine M. King, Anargyros Megalios, Lindy L. Visser, Marlous Hoogstraat, Helen R. Davies, Tapsi Kumar, Deborah Collyar, Hilary Stobart, Sarah Pinder, Nicholas N. Navin, Andrew Futreal, Serena Nik-Zainal, E. Shelley Hwang, Lodewyk F. Wessels, Esther H. Lips, Alastair Thompson, Jelle Wesseling, Elinor J. Sawyer. Copy number analysis of pure DCIS and association with recurrence [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5108.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Vandna Shah
- 1King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rana Shami
- 1King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Hilary Stobart
- 7Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lips EH, Kumar T, Megalios A, Visser LL, Sheinman M, Fortunato A, Shah V, Hoogstraat M, Sei E, Mallo D, Roman-Escorza M, Ahmed AA, Xu M, van den Belt-Dusebout AW, Brugman W, Casasent AK, Clements K, Davies HR, Fu L, Grigoriadis A, Hardman TM, King LM, Krete M, Kristel P, de Maaker M, Maley CC, Marks JR, Menegaz BA, Mulder L, Nieboer F, Nowinski S, Pinder S, Quist J, Salinas-Souza C, Schaapveld M, Schmidt MK, Shaaban AM, Shami R, Sridharan M, Zhang J, Stobart H, Collyar D, Nik-Zainal S, Wessels LFA, Hwang ES, Navin NE, Futreal PA, Thompson AM, Wesseling J, Sawyer EJ. Genomic analysis defines clonal relationships of ductal carcinoma in situ and recurrent invasive breast cancer. Nat Genet 2022; 54:850-860. [PMID: 35681052 PMCID: PMC9197769 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-022-01082-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the most common form of preinvasive breast cancer and, despite treatment, a small fraction (5-10%) of DCIS patients develop subsequent invasive disease. A fundamental biologic question is whether the invasive disease arises from tumor cells in the initial DCIS or represents new unrelated disease. To address this question, we performed genomic analyses on the initial DCIS lesion and paired invasive recurrent tumors in 95 patients together with single-cell DNA sequencing in a subset of cases. Our data show that in 75% of cases the invasive recurrence was clonally related to the initial DCIS, suggesting that tumor cells were not eliminated during the initial treatment. Surprisingly, however, 18% were clonally unrelated to the DCIS, representing new independent lineages and 7% of cases were ambiguous. This knowledge is essential for accurate risk evaluation of DCIS, treatment de-escalation strategies and the identification of predictive biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther H Lips
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tapsi Kumar
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- MD Anderson UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anargyros Megalios
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lindy L Visser
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Sheinman
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute and The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Angelo Fortunato
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
- Biodesign Center for Biocomputing, Security and Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Vandna Shah
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Marlous Hoogstraat
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute and The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emi Sei
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Diego Mallo
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
- Biodesign Center for Biocomputing, Security and Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Maria Roman-Escorza
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ahmed A Ahmed
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mingchu Xu
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Wim Brugman
- Genomics Core Facility, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna K Casasent
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Karen Clements
- Screening Quality Assurance Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Helen R Davies
- Early Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre and Academic Department of Medical Genetics, Cambridge Biomedical Research Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Liping Fu
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anita Grigoriadis
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Timothy M Hardman
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lorraine M King
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Marielle Krete
- Genomics Core Facility, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petra Kristel
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel de Maaker
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carlo C Maley
- Biodesign Center for Biocomputing, Security and Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Brian A Menegaz
- Department of Surgery, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lennart Mulder
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Nieboer
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Salpie Nowinski
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Pinder
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jelmar Quist
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Carolina Salinas-Souza
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Division of Psychosocial research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Abeer M Shaaban
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rana Shami
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mathini Sridharan
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - John Zhang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Serena Nik-Zainal
- Early Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre and Academic Department of Medical Genetics, Cambridge Biomedical Research Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lodewyk F A Wessels
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute and The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics, and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - E Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nicholas E Navin
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - P Andrew Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alastair M Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Divisions of Diagnostic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Elinor J Sawyer
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Peres LC, Colin-Leitzinger C, Sinha S, Marks JR, Conejo-Garcia JR, Alberg AJ, Bandera EV, Berchuck A, Bondy ML, Christensen BC, Cote ML, Doherty JA, Moorman PG, Peters ES, Segura CM, Nguyen JV, Schwartz AG, Terry PD, Wilson CM, Fridley BL, Schildkraut JM. Racial Differences in the Tumor Immune Landscape and Survival of Women with High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022; 31:1006-1016. [PMID: 35244678 PMCID: PMC9081269 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-1334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) confer a survival benefit among patients with ovarian cancer; however, little work has been conducted in racially diverse cohorts. METHODS The current study investigated racial differences in the tumor immune landscape and survival of age- and stage-matched non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White women with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) enrolled in two population-based studies (n = 121 in each racial group). We measured TILs (CD3+), cytotoxic T cells (CD3+CD8+), regulatory T cells (CD3+FoxP3+), myeloid cells (CD11b+), and neutrophils (CD11b+CD15+) via multiplex immunofluorescence. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate the association between immune cell abundance and survival overall and by race. RESULTS Overall, higher levels of TILs, cytotoxic T cells, myeloid cells, and neutrophils were associated with better survival in the intratumoral and peritumoral region, irrespective of tissue compartment (tumor, stroma). Improved survival was noted for T-regulatory cells in the peritumoral region and in the stroma of the intratumoral region, but no association for intratumoral T-regulatory cells. Despite similar abundance of immune cells across racial groups, associations with survival among non-Hispanic White women were consistent with the overall findings, but among non-Hispanic Black women, most associations were attenuated and not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Our results add to the existing evidence that a robust immune infiltrate confers a survival advantage among women with HGSOC; however, non-Hispanic Black women may not experience the same survival benefit as non-Hispanic White women with HGSOC. IMPACT This study contributes to our understanding of the immunoepidemiology of HGSOC in diverse populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren C. Peres
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Sweta Sinha
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jeffrey R. Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jose R. Conejo-Garcia
- Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Anthony J. Alberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
| | - Elisa V. Bandera
- Department of Population Science, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Melissa L. Bondy
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Brock C. Christensen
- Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Department of Molecular and Systems Biology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Michele L. Cote
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Jennifer Anne Doherty
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Patricia G. Moorman
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Edward S. Peters
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Carlos Moran Segura
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jonathan V. Nguyen
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Ann G. Schwartz
- Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Paul D. Terry
- Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center – Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee
| | - Christopher M. Wilson
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Brooke L. Fridley
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Joellen M. Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hou R, Peng Y, Grimm LJ, Ren Y, Mazurowski MA, Marks JR, King LM, Maley CC, Hwang ES, Lo JY. Anomaly Detection of Calcifications in Mammography Based on 11,000 Negative Cases. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2022; 69:1639-1650. [PMID: 34788216 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2021.3126281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
In mammography, calcifications are one of the most common signs of breast cancer. Detection of such lesions is an active area of research for computer-aided diagnosis and machine learning algorithms. Due to limited numbers of positive cases, many supervised detection models suffer from overfitting and fail to generalize. We present a one-class, semi-supervised framework using a deep convolutional autoencoder trained with over 50,000 images from 11,000 negative-only cases. Since the model learned from only normal breast parenchymal features, calcifications produced large signals when comparing the residuals between input and reconstruction output images. As a key advancement, a structural dissimilarity index was used to suppress non-structural noises. Our selected model achieved pixel-based AUROC of 0.959 and AUPRC of 0.676 during validation, where calcification masks were defined in a semi-automated process. Although not trained directly on any cancers, detection performance of calcification lesions on 1,883 testing images (645 malignant and 1238 negative) achieved 75% sensitivity at 2.5 false positives per image. Performance plateaued early when trained with only a fraction of the cases, and greater model complexity or a larger dataset did not improve performance. This study demonstrates the potential of this anomaly detection approach to detect mammographic calcifications in a semi-supervised manner with efficient use of a small number of labeled images, and may facilitate new clinical applications such as computer-aided triage and quality improvement.
Collapse
|
19
|
Dareng EO, Tyrer JP, Barnes DR, Jones MR, Yang X, Aben KKH, Adank MA, Agata S, Andrulis IL, Anton-Culver H, Antonenkova NN, Aravantinos G, Arun BK, Augustinsson A, Balmaña J, Bandera EV, Barkardottir RB, Barrowdale D, Beckmann MW, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Benitez J, Bermisheva M, Bernardini MQ, Bjorge L, Black A, Bogdanova NV, Bonanni B, Borg A, Brenton JD, Budzilowska A, Butzow R, Buys SS, Cai H, Caligo MA, Campbell I, Cannioto R, Cassingham H, Chang-Claude J, Chanock SJ, Chen K, Chiew YE, Chung WK, Claes KBM, Colonna S, Cook LS, Couch FJ, Daly MB, Dao F, Davies E, de la Hoya M, de Putter R, Dennis J, DePersia A, Devilee P, Diez O, Ding YC, Doherty JA, Domchek SM, Dörk T, du Bois A, Dürst M, Eccles DM, Eliassen HA, Engel C, Evans GD, Fasching PA, Flanagan JM, Fortner RT, Machackova E, Friedman E, Ganz PA, Garber J, Gensini F, Giles GG, Glendon G, Godwin AK, Goodman MT, Greene MH, Gronwald J, Hahnen E, Haiman CA, Håkansson N, Hamann U, Hansen TVO, Harris HR, Hartman M, Heitz F, Hildebrandt MAT, Høgdall E, Høgdall CK, Hopper JL, Huang RY, Huff C, Hulick PJ, Huntsman DG, Imyanitov EN, Isaacs C, Jakubowska A, James PA, Janavicius R, Jensen A, Johannsson OT, John EM, Jones ME, Kang D, Karlan BY, Karnezis A, Kelemen LE, Khusnutdinova E, Kiemeney LA, Kim BG, Kjaer SK, Komenaka I, Kupryjanczyk J, Kurian AW, Kwong A, Lambrechts D, Larson MC, Lazaro C, Le ND, Leslie G, Lester J, Lesueur F, Levine DA, Li L, Li J, Loud JT, Lu KH, Lubiński J, Mai PL, Manoukian S, Marks JR, Matsuno RK, Matsuo K, May T, McGuffog L, McLaughlin JR, McNeish IA, Mebirouk N, Menon U, Miller A, Milne RL, Minlikeeva A, Modugno F, Montagna M, Moysich KB, Munro E, Nathanson KL, Neuhausen SL, Nevanlinna H, Yie JNY, Nielsen HR, Nielsen FC, Nikitina-Zake L, Odunsi K, Offit K, Olah E, Olbrecht S, Olopade OI, Olson SH, Olsson H, Osorio A, Papi L, Park SK, Parsons MT, Pathak H, Pedersen IS, Peixoto A, Pejovic T, Perez-Segura P, Permuth JB, Peshkin B, Peterlongo P, Piskorz A, Prokofyeva D, Radice P, Rantala J, Riggan MJ, Risch HA, Rodriguez-Antona C, Ross E, Rossing MA, Runnebaum I, Sandler DP, Santamariña M, Soucy P, Schmutzler RK, Setiawan VW, Shan K, Sieh W, Simard J, Singer CF, Sokolenko AP, Song H, Southey MC, Steed H, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Sutphen R, Swerdlow AJ, Tan YY, Teixeira MR, Teo SH, Terry KL, Terry MB, Thomassen M, Thompson PJ, Thomsen LCV, Thull DL, Tischkowitz M, Titus L, Toland AE, Torres D, Trabert B, Travis R, Tung N, Tworoger SS, Valen E, van Altena AM, van der Hout AH, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, van Rensburg EJ, Vega A, Edwards DV, Vierkant RA, Wang F, Wappenschmidt B, Webb PM, Weinberg CR, Weitzel JN, Wentzensen N, White E, Whittemore AS, Winham SJ, Wolk A, Woo YL, Wu AH, Yan L, Yannoukakos D, Zavaglia KM, Zheng W, Ziogas A, Zorn KK, Kleibl Z, Easton D, Lawrenson K, DeFazio A, Sellers TA, Ramus SJ, Pearce CL, Monteiro AN, Cunningham J, Goode EL, Schildkraut JM, Berchuck A, Chenevix-Trench G, Gayther SA, Antoniou AC, Pharoah PDP. Correction: Polygenic risk modeling for prediction of epithelial ovarian cancer risk. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:630-631. [PMID: 35314806 PMCID: PMC9090804 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01085-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen O Dareng
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan P Tyrer
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Daniel R Barnes
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michelle R Jones
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Xin Yang
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Katja K H Aben
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Muriel A Adank
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Family Cancer Clinic, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simona Agata
- Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Padua, Italy
| | - Irene L Andrulis
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Toronto, Department of Molecular Genetics, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- University of California Irvine, Department of Epidemiology, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Natalia N Antonenkova
- N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Minsk, Belarus
| | | | - Banu K Arun
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Annelie Augustinsson
- Lund University, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden
| | - Judith Balmaña
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Hereditary cancer Genetics Group, Barcelona, Spain
- University Hospital of Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medical Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Rosa B Barkardottir
- Landspitali University Hospital, Department of Pathology, Reykjavik, Iceland
- University of Iceland, BMC (Biomedical Centre), Faculty of Medicine, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Daniel Barrowdale
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Javier Benitez
- Biomedical Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
- Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Bermisheva
- Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa, Russia
| | - Marcus Q Bernardini
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Line Bjorge
- Haukeland University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bergen, Norway
- University of Bergen, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, Bergen, Norway
| | - Amanda Black
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Natalia V Bogdanova
- N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Minsk, Belarus
- Hannover Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover, Germany
- Hannover Medical School, Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bernardo Bonanni
- IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, Milan, Italy
| | - Ake Borg
- Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Lund, Sweden
| | - James D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Agnieszka Budzilowska
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Ralf Butzow
- University of Helsinki, Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Saundra S Buys
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Hui Cai
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Maria A Caligo
- University Hospital, SOD Genetica Molecolare, Pisa, Italy
| | - Ian Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rikki Cannioto
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Cancer Pathology & Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Hayley Cassingham
- Division of Human Genetics, The Ohio State University, Department of Internal Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kexin Chen
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Department of Epidemiology, Tianjin, China
| | - Yoke-Eng Chiew
- The University of Sydney, Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Columbia University, Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Sarah Colonna
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Linda S Cook
- University of New Mexico, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Alberta Health Services, Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mary B Daly
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Department of Clinical Genetics, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Fanny Dao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Miguel de la Hoya
- CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Madrid, Spain
| | - Robin de Putter
- Ghent University, Centre for Medical Genetics, Gent, Belgium
| | - Joe Dennis
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Allison DePersia
- NorthShore University Health System, Center for Medical Genetics, Evanston, IL, USA
- The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Peter Devilee
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Orland Diez
- Vall dHebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Oncogenetics Group, Barcelona, Spain
- University Hospital Vall dHebron, Clinical and Molecular Genetics Area, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yuan Chun Ding
- Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Department of Population Sciences, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Susan M Domchek
- University of Pennsylvania, Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Hannover Medical School, Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte (KEM), Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
- Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Matthias Dürst
- Jena University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University, Department of Gynaecology, Jena, Germany
| | - Diana M Eccles
- University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
| | - Heather A Eliassen
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Boston, MA, USA
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Channing Division of Network Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christoph Engel
- University of Leipzig, Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig, Germany
- University of Leipzig, LIFE-Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Gareth D Evans
- University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter A Fasching
- University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
- University of California at Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James M Flanagan
- Imperial College London, Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, London, UK
| | - Renée T Fortner
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Machackova
- Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Eitan Friedman
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, The Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Tel Aviv University, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| | - Patricia A Ganz
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Centre, UCLA, Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Division of Cancer Prevention & Control Research, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Judy Garber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Cancer Risk and Prevention Clinic, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Francesca Gensini
- University of Florence, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio', Medical Genetics Unit, Florence, Italy
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Division, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Monash University, Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Gord Glendon
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew K Godwin
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mark H Greene
- National Cancer Institute, Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Cologne, Germany
| | - Christopher A Haiman
- University of Southern California, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Niclas Håkansson
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ute Hamann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas V O Hansen
- Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Holly R Harris
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mikael Hartman
- National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore
- National University Health System, Department of Surgery, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Florian Heitz
- Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte (KEM), Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
- Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Estrid Høgdall
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Copenhagen, Denmark
- University of Copenhagen, Molecular Unit, Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Claus K Høgdall
- University of Copenhagen, Department of Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - John L Hopper
- The University of Melbourne, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ruea-Yea Huang
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Center For Immunotherapy, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Chad Huff
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Epidemiology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter J Hulick
- NorthShore University Health System, Center for Medical Genetics, Evanston, IL, USA
- The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David G Huntsman
- BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Cancer Research Centre, Department of Molecular Oncology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Claudine Isaacs
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Szczecin, Poland
- Pomeranian Medical University, Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Paul A James
- The University of Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ramunas Janavicius
- Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics, Hematology, oncology and transfusion medicine center, Dept. of Molecular and Regenerative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
- State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Allan Jensen
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Esther M John
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Michael E Jones
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, London, UK
| | - Daehee Kang
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Seoul National University Graduate School, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
- Seoul National University, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Korea
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- University of California at Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anthony Karnezis
- UC Davis Medical Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Elza Khusnutdinova
- Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa, Russia
- Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Lambertus A Kiemeney
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Byoung-Gie Kim
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Susanne K Kjaer
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Copenhagen, Denmark
- University of Copenhagen, Department of Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ian Komenaka
- City of Hope Clinical Cancer Genetics Community Research Network, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jolanta Kupryjanczyk
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Allison W Kurian
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ava Kwong
- Cancer Genetics Centre, Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Happy Valley, Hong Kong
- The University of Hong Kong, Department of Surgery, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
- Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Department of Surgery, Happy Valley, Hong Kong
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium
- University of Leuven, Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Melissa C Larson
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Conxi Lazaro
- ONCOBELL-IDIBELL-IGTP, Catalan Institute of Oncology, CIBERONC, Hereditary Cancer Program, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nhu D Le
- BC Cancer, Cancer Control Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Goska Leslie
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jenny Lester
- University of California at Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Fabienne Lesueur
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France
- Inserm U900, Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer team, Paris, France
| | - Douglas A Levine
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- NYU Langone Medical Center, Gynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Pearlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lian Li
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Department of Epidemiology, Tianjin, China
| | - Jingmei Li
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Human Genetics Division, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jennifer T Loud
- National Cancer Institute, Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Karen H Lu
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Phuong L Mai
- Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Milan, Italy
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Duke University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Rayna Kim Matsuno
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Cancer Epidemiology Program, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Keitaro Matsuo
- Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Nagoya, Japan
- Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Taymaa May
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lesley McGuffog
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - John R McLaughlin
- Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Iain A McNeish
- Imperial College London, Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department Surgery & Cancer, London, UK
- University of Glasgow, Institute of Cancer Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| | - Noura Mebirouk
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France
- Inserm U900, Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer team, Paris, France
| | - Usha Menon
- University College London, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London, UK
| | - Austin Miller
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, NRG Oncology, Statistics and Data Management Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Division, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Monash University, Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Albina Minlikeeva
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Magee-Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer Center, Womens Cancer Research Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Marco Montagna
- Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Padua, Italy
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth Munro
- Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Portland, OR, USA
- Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Katherine L Nathanson
- University of Pennsylvania, Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Department of Population Sciences, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- University of Helsinki, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Joanne Ngeow Yuen Yie
- National Cancer Centre, Cancer Genetics Service, Singapore, Singapore
- Nanyang Technological University, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Finn C Nielsen
- Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Kunle Odunsi
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Clinical Genetics Research Lab, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, New York, NY, USA
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edith Olah
- National Institute of Oncology, Department of Molecular Genetics, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Siel Olbrecht
- University Hospitals Leuven, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Sara H Olson
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, New York, NY, USA
| | - Håkan Olsson
- Lund University, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ana Osorio
- Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Papi
- University of Florence, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio', Medical Genetics Unit, Florence, Italy
| | - Sue K Park
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Seoul National University Graduate School, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
- Seoul National University, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Korea
| | - Michael T Parsons
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Harsha Pathak
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Inge Sokilde Pedersen
- Aalborg University Hospital, Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg, Denmark
- Aalborg University Hospital, Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg, Denmark
- Aalborg University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ana Peixoto
- Portuguese Oncology Institute, Department of Genetics, Porto, Portugal
| | - Tanja Pejovic
- Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Portland, OR, USA
- Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Pedro Perez-Segura
- CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jennifer B Permuth
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Beth Peshkin
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- IFOM-the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Genome Diagnostics Program, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Piskorz
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Darya Prokofyeva
- Bashkir State University, Department of Genetics and Fundamental Medicine, Ufa, Russia
| | - Paolo Radice
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Research, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marjorie J Riggan
- Duke University Hospital, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Harvey A Risch
- Yale School of Public Health, Chronic Disease Epidemiology, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Cristina Rodriguez-Antona
- Biomedical Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
- Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eric Ross
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Population Studies Facility, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mary Anne Rossing
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ingo Runnebaum
- Jena University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University, Department of Gynaecology, Jena, Germany
| | - Dale P Sandler
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Epidemiology Branch, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Marta Santamariña
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
- Fundación Pública Galega Medicina Xenómica, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
| | - Penny Soucy
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Genomics Center, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Cologne, Germany
| | - V Wendy Setiawan
- University of Southern California, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kang Shan
- Hebei Medical University, Fourth Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, New York, NY, USA
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jacques Simard
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Genomic Center, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Christian F Singer
- Medical University of Vienna, Dept of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Honglin Song
- University of Cambridge, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Division, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Monash University, Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Department of Clinical Pathology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Helen Steed
- Royal Alexandra Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- INSERM U830, Department of Tumour Biology, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Service de Génétique, Paris, France
- Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Rebecca Sutphen
- University of South Florida, Epidemiology Center, College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Breast Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Yen Yen Tan
- Medical University of Vienna, Dept of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
| | - Manuel R Teixeira
- Portuguese Oncology Institute, Department of Genetics, Porto, Portugal
- University of Porto, Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), Porto, Portugal
| | - Soo Hwang Teo
- Cancer Research Malaysia, Breast Cancer Research Programme, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
- University of Malaya, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Kathryn L Terry
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Boston, MA, USA
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Columbia University, Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Odense University Hospital, Department of Clinical Genetics, Odence C, Denmark
| | - Pamela J Thompson
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Liv Cecilie Vestrheim Thomsen
- Haukeland University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bergen, Norway
- University of Bergen, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, Bergen, Norway
| | - Darcy L Thull
- Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- McGill University, Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Human Genetics and Oncology, Montréal, QC, Canada
- University of Cambridge, Department of Medical Genetics, Cambridge, UK
| | - Linda Titus
- Dartmouth College, Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Amanda E Toland
- The Ohio State University, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Diana Torres
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, Heidelberg, Germany
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Institute of Human Genetics, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Britton Trabert
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ruth Travis
- University of Oxford, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford, UK
| | - Nadine Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shelley S Tworoger
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Boston, MA, USA
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ellen Valen
- Haukeland University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bergen, Norway
- University of Bergen, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, Bergen, Norway
| | - Anne M van Altena
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Annemieke H van der Hout
- University Medical Center Groningen, University Groningen, Department of Genetics, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- University Hospitals Leuven, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Ana Vega
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Digna Velez Edwards
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Division of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Women's Health Research, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Robert A Vierkant
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Frances Wang
- Duke Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke University Hospital, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Cologne, Germany
| | - Penelope M Webb
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Population Health Department, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Clarice R Weinberg
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Emily White
- University of Washington, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alice S Whittemore
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alicja Wolk
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden
- Uppsala University, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Yin-Ling Woo
- University of Malaya, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Anna H Wu
- University of Southern California, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Li Yan
- Hebei Medical University, Fourth Hospital, Department of Molecular Biology, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Drakoulis Yannoukakos
- National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Wei Zheng
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Argyrios Ziogas
- University of California Irvine, Department of Epidemiology, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Kristin K Zorn
- Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Zdenek Kleibl
- Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty od Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Douglas Easton
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kate Lawrenson
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The University of Sydney, Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Susan J Ramus
- University of NSW Sydney, School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of NSW Sydney, Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Celeste L Pearce
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alvaro N Monteiro
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Julie Cunningham
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Emory University, Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Duke University Hospital, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK.
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dareng EO, Tyrer JP, Barnes DR, Jones MR, Yang X, Aben KKH, Adank MA, Agata S, Andrulis IL, Anton-Culver H, Antonenkova NN, Aravantinos G, Arun BK, Augustinsson A, Balmaña J, Bandera EV, Barkardottir RB, Barrowdale D, Beckmann MW, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Benitez J, Bermisheva M, Bernardini MQ, Bjorge L, Black A, Bogdanova NV, Bonanni B, Borg A, Brenton JD, Budzilowska A, Butzow R, Buys SS, Cai H, Caligo MA, Campbell I, Cannioto R, Cassingham H, Chang-Claude J, Chanock SJ, Chen K, Chiew YE, Chung WK, Claes KBM, Colonna S, Cook LS, Couch FJ, Daly MB, Dao F, Davies E, de la Hoya M, de Putter R, Dennis J, DePersia A, Devilee P, Diez O, Ding YC, Doherty JA, Domchek SM, Dörk T, du Bois A, Dürst M, Eccles DM, Eliassen HA, Engel C, Evans GD, Fasching PA, Flanagan JM, Fortner RT, Machackova E, Friedman E, Ganz PA, Garber J, Gensini F, Giles GG, Glendon G, Godwin AK, Goodman MT, Greene MH, Gronwald J, Hahnen E, Haiman CA, Håkansson N, Hamann U, Hansen TVO, Harris HR, Hartman M, Heitz F, Hildebrandt MAT, Høgdall E, Høgdall CK, Hopper JL, Huang RY, Huff C, Hulick PJ, Huntsman DG, Imyanitov EN, Isaacs C, Jakubowska A, James PA, Janavicius R, Jensen A, Johannsson OT, John EM, Jones ME, Kang D, Karlan BY, Karnezis A, Kelemen LE, Khusnutdinova E, Kiemeney LA, Kim BG, Kjaer SK, Komenaka I, Kupryjanczyk J, Kurian AW, Kwong A, Lambrechts D, Larson MC, Lazaro C, Le ND, Leslie G, Lester J, Lesueur F, Levine DA, Li L, Li J, Loud JT, Lu KH, Lubiński J, Mai PL, Manoukian S, Marks JR, Matsuno RK, Matsuo K, May T, McGuffog L, McLaughlin JR, McNeish IA, Mebirouk N, Menon U, Miller A, Milne RL, Minlikeeva A, Modugno F, Montagna M, Moysich KB, Munro E, Nathanson KL, Neuhausen SL, Nevanlinna H, Yie JNY, Nielsen HR, Nielsen FC, Nikitina-Zake L, Odunsi K, Offit K, Olah E, Olbrecht S, Olopade OI, Olson SH, Olsson H, Osorio A, Papi L, Park SK, Parsons MT, Pathak H, Pedersen IS, Peixoto A, Pejovic T, Perez-Segura P, Permuth JB, Peshkin B, Peterlongo P, Piskorz A, Prokofyeva D, Radice P, Rantala J, Riggan MJ, Risch HA, Rodriguez-Antona C, Ross E, Rossing MA, Runnebaum I, Sandler DP, Santamariña M, Soucy P, Schmutzler RK, Setiawan VW, Shan K, Sieh W, Simard J, Singer CF, Sokolenko AP, Song H, Southey MC, Steed H, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Sutphen R, Swerdlow AJ, Tan YY, Teixeira MR, Teo SH, Terry KL, Terry MB, Thomassen M, Thompson PJ, Thomsen LCV, Thull DL, Tischkowitz M, Titus L, Toland AE, Torres D, Trabert B, Travis R, Tung N, Tworoger SS, Valen E, van Altena AM, van der Hout AH, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, van Rensburg EJ, Vega A, Edwards DV, Vierkant RA, Wang F, Wappenschmidt B, Webb PM, Weinberg CR, Weitzel JN, Wentzensen N, White E, Whittemore AS, Winham SJ, Wolk A, Woo YL, Wu AH, Yan L, Yannoukakos D, Zavaglia KM, Zheng W, Ziogas A, Zorn KK, Kleibl Z, Easton D, Lawrenson K, DeFazio A, Sellers TA, Ramus SJ, Pearce CL, Monteiro AN, Cunningham J, Goode EL, Schildkraut JM, Berchuck A, Chenevix-Trench G, Gayther SA, Antoniou AC, Pharoah PDP. Polygenic risk modeling for prediction of epithelial ovarian cancer risk. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:349-362. [PMID: 35027648 PMCID: PMC8904525 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00987-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have the potential to improve risk stratification. Joint estimation of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) effects in models could improve predictive performance over standard approaches of PRS construction. Here, we implemented computationally efficient, penalized, logistic regression models (lasso, elastic net, stepwise) to individual level genotype data and a Bayesian framework with continuous shrinkage, "select and shrink for summary statistics" (S4), to summary level data for epithelial non-mucinous ovarian cancer risk prediction. We developed the models in a dataset consisting of 23,564 non-mucinous EOC cases and 40,138 controls participating in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) and validated the best models in three populations of different ancestries: prospective data from 198,101 women of European ancestries; 7,669 women of East Asian ancestries; 1,072 women of African ancestries, and in 18,915 BRCA1 and 12,337 BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers of European ancestries. In the external validation data, the model with the strongest association for non-mucinous EOC risk derived from the OCAC model development data was the S4 model (27,240 SNPs) with odds ratios (OR) of 1.38 (95% CI: 1.28-1.48, AUC: 0.588) per unit standard deviation, in women of European ancestries; 1.14 (95% CI: 1.08-1.19, AUC: 0.538) in women of East Asian ancestries; 1.38 (95% CI: 1.21-1.58, AUC: 0.593) in women of African ancestries; hazard ratios of 1.36 (95% CI: 1.29-1.43, AUC: 0.592) in BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers and 1.49 (95% CI: 1.35-1.64, AUC: 0.624) in BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. Incorporation of the S4 PRS in risk prediction models for ovarian cancer may have clinical utility in ovarian cancer prevention programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen O Dareng
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan P Tyrer
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Daniel R Barnes
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michelle R Jones
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Xin Yang
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Katja K H Aben
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Muriel A Adank
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Family Cancer Clinic, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simona Agata
- Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Padua, Italy
| | - Irene L Andrulis
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Toronto, Department of Molecular Genetics, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- University of California Irvine, Department of Epidemiology, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Natalia N Antonenkova
- N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Minsk, Belarus
| | | | - Banu K Arun
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Annelie Augustinsson
- Lund University, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden
| | - Judith Balmaña
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Hereditary cancer Genetics Group, Barcelona, Spain
- University Hospital of Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medical Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Rosa B Barkardottir
- Landspitali University Hospital, Department of Pathology, Reykjavik, Iceland
- University of Iceland, BMC (Biomedical Centre), Faculty of Medicine, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Daniel Barrowdale
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Javier Benitez
- Biomedical Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
- Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Bermisheva
- Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa, Russia
| | - Marcus Q Bernardini
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Line Bjorge
- Haukeland University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bergen, Norway
- University of Bergen, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, Bergen, Norway
| | - Amanda Black
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Natalia V Bogdanova
- N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Minsk, Belarus
- Hannover Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover, Germany
- Hannover Medical School, Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bernardo Bonanni
- IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, Milan, Italy
| | - Ake Borg
- Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Lund, Sweden
| | - James D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Agnieszka Budzilowska
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Ralf Butzow
- University of Helsinki, Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Saundra S Buys
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Hui Cai
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Maria A Caligo
- University Hospital, SOD Genetica Molecolare, Pisa, Italy
| | - Ian Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rikki Cannioto
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Cancer Pathology & Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Hayley Cassingham
- Division of Human Genetics, The Ohio State University, Department of Internal Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kexin Chen
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Department of Epidemiology, Tianjin, China
| | - Yoke-Eng Chiew
- The University of Sydney, Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Columbia University, Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Sarah Colonna
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Linda S Cook
- University of New Mexico, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Alberta Health Services, Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mary B Daly
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Department of Clinical Genetics, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Fanny Dao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Miguel de la Hoya
- CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Madrid, Spain
| | - Robin de Putter
- Ghent University, Centre for Medical Genetics, Gent, Belgium
| | - Joe Dennis
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Allison DePersia
- NorthShore University Health System, Center for Medical Genetics, Evanston, IL, USA
- The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Peter Devilee
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Orland Diez
- Vall dHebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Oncogenetics Group, Barcelona, Spain
- University Hospital Vall dHebron, Clinical and Molecular Genetics Area, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yuan Chun Ding
- Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Department of Population Sciences, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Susan M Domchek
- University of Pennsylvania, Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Hannover Medical School, Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte (KEM), Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
- Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Matthias Dürst
- Jena University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University, Department of Gynaecology, Jena, Germany
| | - Diana M Eccles
- University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
| | - Heather A Eliassen
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Boston, MA, USA
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Channing Division of Network Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christoph Engel
- University of Leipzig, Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig, Germany
- University of Leipzig, LIFE-Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Gareth D Evans
- University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
- St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter A Fasching
- University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
- University of California at Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James M Flanagan
- Imperial College London, Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, London, UK
| | - Renée T Fortner
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Machackova
- Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Eitan Friedman
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, The Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Tel Aviv University, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| | - Patricia A Ganz
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Centre, UCLA, Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Division of Cancer Prevention & Control Research, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Judy Garber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Cancer Risk and Prevention Clinic, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Francesca Gensini
- University of Florence, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio', Medical Genetics Unit, Florence, Italy
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Division, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Monash University, Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Gord Glendon
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew K Godwin
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mark H Greene
- National Cancer Institute, Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Cologne, Germany
| | - Christopher A Haiman
- University of Southern California, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Niclas Håkansson
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ute Hamann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas V O Hansen
- Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Holly R Harris
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mikael Hartman
- National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore
- National University Health System, Department of Surgery, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Florian Heitz
- Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte (KEM), Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
- Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Estrid Høgdall
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Copenhagen, Denmark
- University of Copenhagen, Molecular Unit, Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Claus K Høgdall
- University of Copenhagen, Department of Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - John L Hopper
- The University of Melbourne, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ruea-Yea Huang
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Center For Immunotherapy, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Chad Huff
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Epidemiology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter J Hulick
- NorthShore University Health System, Center for Medical Genetics, Evanston, IL, USA
- The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David G Huntsman
- BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Cancer Research Centre, Department of Molecular Oncology, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Claudine Isaacs
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Szczecin, Poland
- Pomeranian Medical University, Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Paul A James
- The University of Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ramunas Janavicius
- Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics, Hematology, oncology and transfusion medicine center, Dept. of Molecular and Regenerative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
- State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Allan Jensen
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Esther M John
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Michael E Jones
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, London, UK
| | - Daehee Kang
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Seoul National University Graduate School, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
- Seoul National University, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Korea
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- University of California at Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anthony Karnezis
- UC Davis Medical Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Elza Khusnutdinova
- Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa, Russia
- Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Lambertus A Kiemeney
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Byoung-Gie Kim
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Susanne K Kjaer
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Copenhagen, Denmark
- University of Copenhagen, Department of Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ian Komenaka
- City of Hope Clinical Cancer Genetics Community Research Network, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jolanta Kupryjanczyk
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Allison W Kurian
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ava Kwong
- Cancer Genetics Centre, Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Happy Valley, Hong Kong
- The University of Hong Kong, Department of Surgery, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
- Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Department of Surgery, Happy Valley, Hong Kong
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium
- University of Leuven, Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Melissa C Larson
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Conxi Lazaro
- ONCOBELL-IDIBELL-IGTP, Catalan Institute of Oncology, CIBERONC, Hereditary Cancer Program, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nhu D Le
- BC Cancer, Cancer Control Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Goska Leslie
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jenny Lester
- University of California at Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Fabienne Lesueur
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France
- Inserm U900, Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer team, Paris, France
| | - Douglas A Levine
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- NYU Langone Medical Center, Gynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Pearlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lian Li
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Department of Epidemiology, Tianjin, China
| | - Jingmei Li
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Human Genetics Division, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jennifer T Loud
- National Cancer Institute, Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Karen H Lu
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Phuong L Mai
- Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Milan, Italy
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Duke University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Rayna Kim Matsuno
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Cancer Epidemiology Program, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Keitaro Matsuo
- Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Nagoya, Japan
- Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Taymaa May
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lesley McGuffog
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - John R McLaughlin
- Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Iain A McNeish
- Imperial College London, Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department Surgery & Cancer, London, UK
- University of Glasgow, Institute of Cancer Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| | - Noura Mebirouk
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France
- Inserm U900, Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer team, Paris, France
| | - Usha Menon
- University College London, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London, UK
| | - Austin Miller
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, NRG Oncology, Statistics and Data Management Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Division, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Monash University, Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Albina Minlikeeva
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Magee-Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer Center, Womens Cancer Research Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Marco Montagna
- Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Padua, Italy
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth Munro
- Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Portland, OR, USA
- Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Katherine L Nathanson
- University of Pennsylvania, Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Department of Population Sciences, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- University of Helsinki, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Joanne Ngeow Yuen Yie
- National Cancer Centre, Cancer Genetics Service, Singapore, Singapore
- Nanyang Technological University, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Finn C Nielsen
- Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Kunle Odunsi
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Clinical Genetics Research Lab, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, New York, NY, USA
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edith Olah
- National Institute of Oncology, Department of Molecular Genetics, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Siel Olbrecht
- University Hospitals Leuven, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Sara H Olson
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, New York, NY, USA
| | - Håkan Olsson
- Lund University, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ana Osorio
- Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Papi
- University of Florence, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio', Medical Genetics Unit, Florence, Italy
| | - Sue K Park
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Seoul National University Graduate School, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
- Seoul National University, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Korea
| | - Michael T Parsons
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Harsha Pathak
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Inge Sokilde Pedersen
- Aalborg University Hospital, Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg, Denmark
- Aalborg University Hospital, Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg, Denmark
- Aalborg University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ana Peixoto
- Portuguese Oncology Institute, Department of Genetics, Porto, Portugal
| | - Tanja Pejovic
- Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Portland, OR, USA
- Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Pedro Perez-Segura
- CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jennifer B Permuth
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Beth Peshkin
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- IFOM-the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Genome Diagnostics Program, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Piskorz
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Darya Prokofyeva
- Bashkir State University, Department of Genetics and Fundamental Medicine, Ufa, Russia
| | - Paolo Radice
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Research, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marjorie J Riggan
- Duke University Hospital, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Harvey A Risch
- Yale School of Public Health, Chronic Disease Epidemiology, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Cristina Rodriguez-Antona
- Biomedical Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
- Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eric Ross
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Population Studies Facility, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mary Anne Rossing
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ingo Runnebaum
- Jena University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University, Department of Gynaecology, Jena, Germany
| | - Dale P Sandler
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Epidemiology Branch, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Marta Santamariña
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
- Fundación Pública Galega Medicina Xenómica, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
| | - Penny Soucy
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Genomics Center, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Cologne, Germany
| | - V Wendy Setiawan
- University of Southern California, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kang Shan
- Hebei Medical University, Fourth Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, New York, NY, USA
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jacques Simard
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Genomic Center, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Christian F Singer
- Medical University of Vienna, Dept of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Honglin Song
- University of Cambridge, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Division, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Monash University, Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Department of Clinical Pathology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Helen Steed
- Royal Alexandra Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- INSERM U830, Department of Tumour Biology, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Service de Génétique, Paris, France
- Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Rebecca Sutphen
- University of South Florida, Epidemiology Center, College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Breast Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Yen Yen Tan
- Medical University of Vienna, Dept of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
| | - Manuel R Teixeira
- Portuguese Oncology Institute, Department of Genetics, Porto, Portugal
- University of Porto, Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), Porto, Portugal
| | - Soo Hwang Teo
- Cancer Research Malaysia, Breast Cancer Research Programme, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
- University of Malaya, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Kathryn L Terry
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Boston, MA, USA
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Columbia University, Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Odense University Hospital, Department of Clinical Genetics, Odence C, Denmark
| | - Pamela J Thompson
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Liv Cecilie Vestrheim Thomsen
- Haukeland University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bergen, Norway
- University of Bergen, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, Bergen, Norway
| | - Darcy L Thull
- Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- McGill University, Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Human Genetics and Oncology, Montréal, QC, Canada
- University of Cambridge, Department of Medical Genetics, Cambridge, UK
| | - Linda Titus
- Dartmouth College, Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Amanda E Toland
- The Ohio State University, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Diana Torres
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, Heidelberg, Germany
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Institute of Human Genetics, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Britton Trabert
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ruth Travis
- University of Oxford, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford, UK
| | - Nadine Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shelley S Tworoger
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Boston, MA, USA
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ellen Valen
- Haukeland University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bergen, Norway
- University of Bergen, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, Bergen, Norway
| | - Anne M van Altena
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Annemieke H van der Hout
- University Medical Center Groningen, University Groningen, Department of Genetics, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- University Hospitals Leuven, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Ana Vega
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Digna Velez Edwards
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Division of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Women's Health Research, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Robert A Vierkant
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Frances Wang
- Duke Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke University Hospital, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Cologne, Germany
| | - Penelope M Webb
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Population Health Department, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Clarice R Weinberg
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Emily White
- University of Washington, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alice S Whittemore
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alicja Wolk
- Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden
- Uppsala University, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Yin-Ling Woo
- University of Malaya, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Anna H Wu
- University of Southern California, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Li Yan
- Hebei Medical University, Fourth Hospital, Department of Molecular Biology, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Drakoulis Yannoukakos
- National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Wei Zheng
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Argyrios Ziogas
- University of California Irvine, Department of Epidemiology, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Kristin K Zorn
- Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Zdenek Kleibl
- Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty od Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Douglas Easton
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kate Lawrenson
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The University of Sydney, Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Susan J Ramus
- University of NSW Sydney, School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of NSW Sydney, Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Celeste L Pearce
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alvaro N Monteiro
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Julie Cunningham
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Emory University, Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Duke University Hospital, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK.
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Strand SH, Rivero-Gutiérrez B, Houlahan KE, Seoane JA, King LM, Risom T, Simpson L, Vennam S, Khan A, Hardman T, Harmon BE, Couch FJ, Gallagher K, Kilgore M, Wei S, DeMichele A, King T, McAuliffe PF, Nangia J, Lee J, Tseng J, Storniolo AM, Thompson A, Gupta G, Burns R, Veis DJ, DeSchryver K, Zhu C, Matusiak M, Wang J, Zhu SX, Tappenden J, Ding DY, Zhang D, Luo J, Jiang S, Varma S, Straub C, Srivastava S, Curtis C, Tibshirani R, Angelo RM, Hall A, Owzar K, Polyak K, Maley C, Marks JR, Colditz GA, Hwang ES, West RB. Abstract GS4-07: The Breast PreCancer Atlas DCIS genomic signatures define biology and correlate with clinical outcomes: An analysis of TBCRC 038 and RAHBT cohorts. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-gs4-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background. DCIS consists of a molecularly heterogeneous group of premalignant lesions, with variable risk of invasive progression. Understanding biomarkers for invasive progression could help individualize treatment recommendations based upon tumor biology. As part of the NCI Human Tumor Atlas Network (HTAN), we conducted comprehensive genomic analyses on two large DCIS case-control cohorts. Methods. We performed smart3-seq and low-pass whole genome sequencing on two independent, retrospective, longitudinally sampled DCIS case-control cohorts. TBCRC 038 was a multicenter cohort diagnosed with DCIS between 1998 and 2016 at one of the Translational Breast Cancer Research sites; the RAHBT (Resource of Archival Human Breast Tissue) cohort included women identified through the St. Louis Breast Tissue Repository, and the Women’s Health Repository diagnosed between 1997 and 2001. We studied the spectrum of molecular changes present and sought genomic predictors of subsequent ipsilateral breast events (iBEs: DCIS recurrence or invasive progression) in both DCIS epithelium and stroma in formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue. We generated de novo tumor and stroma-centric subtypes for DCIS that represents fundamental transcriptomic organization. Copy number analysis was performed using low-pass DNA sequencing. Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) was applied to the RNA expression of all coding genes to identify clusters. A negative-binomial regression model was used to identify differentially expressed genes. Results. We analyzed 677 DCIS samples from 481 patients with 7.1 years median follow-up. In TBCRC samples, we identified three clusters via NMF in TBCRC referred to as ER low, quiescent, and ER high. The ER-low cluster had significantly higher levels of ERBB2 and lower levels of ESR1 compared to quiescent and ER-high clusters. Quiescent cluster lesions were less proliferative and less metabolically active than ER high and ER low subtypes. These findings were replicated in the RAHBT cohort. Focusing on the stromal component of DCIS from laser capture microdissection in RAHBT samples, we identified four distinct DCIS-associated stromal clusters. A “normal-like” stromal cluster with ECM organization and PI3K-AKT signaling; a “collagen-rich” stromal cluster; a “desmoplastic” stromal cluster with high fibroblast and total myeloid abundance, mostly associated with macrophages and myeloid dendritic cells (mDC); and an “immune-dense” stromal cluster. Further, we compared differentially expressed genes in patients with or without subsequent iBEs within 5 years of diagnosis. Hypothesizing that the resulting 812 DE genes (DESeq2) represent multiple routes to subsequent iBEs, we leveraged NMF to identify paths to progression. In both TBCRC and RAHBT cohorts, poor outcome groups exhibited increased ER, MYC signaling, and oxidative phosphorylation, supporting that these pathways are important for DCIS recurrence and progression. Conclusion. Comprehensive genomic profiling in two independent DCIS cohorts with longitudinal outcomes shows distinct DCIS stromal expression patterns and immune cell composition. RNA expression profiles reveal underlying tumor biology that is associated with later iBEs in both cohorts. These studies provide new insight into DCIS biology and will guide the design of diagnostic strategies to prevent invasive progression.
Citation Format: Siri H Strand, Belén Rivero-Gutiérrez, Kathleen E Houlahan, Jose A Seoane, Lorraine M King, Tyler Risom, Lunden Simpson, Sujay Vennam, Aziz Khan, Timothy Hardman, Bryan E Harmon, Fergus J Couch, Kristalyn Gallagher, Mark Kilgore, Shi Wei, Angela DeMichele, Tari King, Priscilla F McAuliffe, Julie Nangia, Joanna Lee, Jennifer Tseng, Anna Maria Storniolo, Alastair Thompson, Gaorav Gupta, Robyn Burns, Deborah J Veis, Katherine DeSchryver, Chunfang Zhu, Magdalena Matusiak, Jason Wang, Shirley X Zhu, Jen Tappenden, Daisy Yi Ding, Dadong Zhang, Jingqin Luo, Shu Jiang, Sushama Varma, Cody Straub, Sucheta Srivastava, Christina Curtis, Rob Tibshirani, Robert Michael Angelo, Allison Hall, Kouros Owzar, Kornelia Polyak, Carlo Maley, Jeffrey R Marks, Graham A Colditz, E Shelley Hwang, Robert B West. The Breast PreCancer Atlas DCIS genomic signatures define biology and correlate with clinical outcomes: An analysis of TBCRC 038 and RAHBT cohorts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jose A Seoane
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Shi Wei
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | - Tari King
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Gaorav Gupta
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Shu Jiang
- Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bismeijer T, Ahmed AA, Sheinman M, Roman-Escorza M, Shah V, Marks JR, King LM, Megalios A, Visser LL, Hoogstraat M, Davies HR, Kumar T, Collyar D, Stobart H, Navin NN, Futreal A, Nik-Zainal S, Hwang S, Lips EH, Thompson A, Wessels LFA, Sawyer EJ, Wesseling J. Abstract P1-22-05: Identifying predictors of invasive recurrence based on molecular profiles of DCIS lesions. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p1-22-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor of invasive breast cancer. Patients with DCIS are routinely treated by breast-conserving surgery often supplemented by radiotherapy, although many will never develop invasive disease. To date, no robust predictors of invasive breast cancer recurrence following DCIS have been identified. In our efforts to find such predictors, we performed gene expression, copy number and mutation analysis on two large DCIS cohorts with long-term follow-up. Methods Two nested case control series were analyzed, where cases are defined as DCIS with a subsequent invasive breast cancer and controls remained disease free during follow up. Cases and controls were matched on age and on follow up duration and were derived from two nation-wide cohort studies. The Sloane cohort is a prospective breast screening cohort from the UK, median follow up is 6 years (range 1-10). The Dutch cohort is population-based and had a median follow up of 13 years (range 2-23). We performed copy number analysis using CytoSNP array or low pass whole genome sequencing (lpWGS) on 310 controls and 196 cases, and RNA-seq on 295 controls and 206 cases. Results First analyses on the copy number data suggest that cases are genetically more aberrant with multiple regions of amplification compared to controls (p < 0.05). RNA-seq was used to classify DCIS into the PAM50 subtypes which did not appear to be predictive of recurrence. Initial RNA-seq analysis did not show consistent gene expression differences between cases and controls in the Sloane or Dutch cohorts, possibly explained by differences in clinical characteristics of the cohorts. A new computational method has been developed accounting for the differences in follow-up times, results will be presented at SABCS. Targeted sequencing revealed that the most common mutations were in PIK3CA and TP53, but there was no association with recurrence. Conclusion Only small molecular differences were identified between DCIS that recurs as invasive breast cancer and DCIS that remains disease-free. Currently, we are seeking to identify reproducible differences by a combined analysis of two population-based cohorts in a time dependent fashion. These will be presented at the SABCS. This work was supported by Cancer Research UK and by KWF Dutch Cancer Society (ref.C38317/A24043)
Citation Format: Tycho Bismeijer, Ahmed A Ahmed, Michael Sheinman, Maria Roman-Escorza, Vandna Shah, Jeffrey R Marks, Lorraine M King, Anargyros Megalios, Lindy L Visser, Marlous Hoogstraat, Helen R Davies, Tapsi Kumar, Deborah Collyar, Hilary Stobart, Nicholas N Navin, Andrew Futreal, Serena Nik-Zainal, Shelley Hwang, Esther H Lips, Alastair Thompson, Lodewyk FA Wessels, Elinor J Sawyer, Jelle Wesseling, Grand Challenge PRECISION Consortium. Identifying predictors of invasive recurrence based on molecular profiles of DCIS lesions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-22-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tycho Bismeijer
- Oncode Institute and Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ahmed A Ahmed
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy’s Cancer Centre, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Sheinman
- Oncode Institute and Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maria Roman-Escorza
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy’s Cancer Centre, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Vandna Shah
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy’s Cancer Centre, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Lorraine M King
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Anargyros Megalios
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy’s Cancer Centre, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lindy L Visser
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marlous Hoogstraat
- Oncode Institute and Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Helen R Davies
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre and Academic Department of Medical Genetics, Cambridge Biomedical Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Tapsi Kumar
- Department of Genomic Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Hilary Stobart
- Independent Cancer Patients’ Voice, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andrew Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Serena Nik-Zainal
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre and Academic Department of Medical Genetics, Cambridge Biomedical Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Esther H Lips
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Alastair Thompson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Lodewyk FA Wessels
- Oncode Institute and Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute and Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics, and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Elinor J Sawyer
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy’s Cancer Centre, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Division of Molecular Pathology and Division of Diagnostic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute and Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Risom T, Glass DR, Averbukh I, Liu CC, Baranski A, Kagel A, McCaffrey EF, Greenwald NF, Rivero-Gutiérrez B, Strand SH, Varma S, Kong A, Keren L, Srivastava S, Zhu C, Khair Z, Veis DJ, Deschryver K, Vennam S, Maley C, Hwang ES, Marks JR, Bendall SC, Colditz GA, West RB, Angelo M. Transition to invasive breast cancer is associated with progressive changes in the structure and composition of tumor stroma. Cell 2022; 185:299-310.e18. [PMID: 35063072 PMCID: PMC8792442 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 63.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a pre-invasive lesion that is thought to be a precursor to invasive breast cancer (IBC). To understand the changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) accompanying transition to IBC, we used multiplexed ion beam imaging by time of flight (MIBI-TOF) and a 37-plex antibody staining panel to interrogate 79 clinically annotated surgical resections using machine learning tools for cell segmentation, pixel-based clustering, and object morphometrics. Comparison of normal breast with patient-matched DCIS and IBC revealed coordinated transitions between four TME states that were delineated based on the location and function of myoepithelium, fibroblasts, and immune cells. Surprisingly, myoepithelial disruption was more advanced in DCIS patients that did not develop IBC, suggesting this process could be protective against recurrence. Taken together, this HTAN Breast PreCancer Atlas study offers insight into drivers of IBC relapse and emphasizes the importance of the TME in regulating these processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Risom
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Research Pathology, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David R Glass
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Inna Averbukh
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Candace C Liu
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Alex Baranski
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Adam Kagel
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Erin F McCaffrey
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Noah F Greenwald
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Siri H Strand
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sushama Varma
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Alex Kong
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Leeat Keren
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sucheta Srivastava
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Chunfang Zhu
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Zumana Khair
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Deborah J Veis
- Departments of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Katherine Deschryver
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sujay Vennam
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Carlo Maley
- Biodesign institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Sean C Bendall
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Graham A Colditz
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Robert B West
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Michael Angelo
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Departments of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hou R, Grimm LJ, Mazurowski MA, Marks JR, King LM, Maley CC, Lynch T, van Oirsouw M, Rogers K, Stone N, Wallis M, Teuwen J, Wesseling J, Hwang ES, Lo JY. Prediction of Upstaging in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Based on Mammographic Radiomic Features. Radiology 2022; 303:54-62. [PMID: 34981975 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.210407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background Improving diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) before surgery is important in choosing optimal patient management strategies. However, patients may harbor occult invasive disease not detected until definitive surgery. Purpose To assess the performance and clinical utility of mammographic radiomic features in the prediction of occult invasive cancer among women diagnosed with DCIS on the basis of core biopsy findings. Materials and Methods In this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective study, digital magnification mammographic images were collected from women who underwent breast core-needle biopsy for calcifications that was performed at a single institution between September 2008 and April 2017 and yielded a diagnosis of DCIS. The database query was directed at asymptomatic women with calcifications without a mass, architectural distortion, asymmetric density, or palpable disease. Logistic regression with regularization was used. Differences across training and internal test set by upstaging rate, age, lesion size, and estrogen and progesterone receptor status were assessed by using the Kruskal-Wallis or χ2 test. Results The study consisted of 700 women with DCIS (age range, 40-89 years; mean age, 59 years ± 10 [standard deviation]), including 114 with lesions (16.3%) upstaged to invasive cancer at subsequent surgery. The sample was split randomly into 400 women for the training set and 300 for the testing set (mean ages: training set, 59 years ± 10; test set, 59 years ± 10; P = .85). A total of 109 radiomic and four clinical features were extracted. The best model on the test set by using all radiomic and clinical features helped predict upstaging with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.79). For a fixed high sensitivity (90%), the model yielded a specificity of 22%, a negative predictive value of 92%, and an odds ratio of 2.4 (95% CI: 1.8, 3.2). High specificity (90%) corresponded to a sensitivity of 37%, positive predictive value of 41%, and odds ratio of 5.0 (95% CI: 2.8, 9.0). Conclusion Machine learning models that use radiomic features applied to mammographic calcifications may help predict upstaging of ductal carcinoma in situ, which can refine clinical decision making and treatment planning. © RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Hou
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.H., L.J.G., J.Y.L.) and Surgery (J.R.M., L.M.K., T.L., E.S.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3513, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC (R.H.); School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz (C.C.M.); Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK (K.R.); School of Physics and Astronomy, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Physics Building, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK (N.S.); Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK (M.W.); and Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.v.O., J.T., J.W.)
| | - Lars J Grimm
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.H., L.J.G., J.Y.L.) and Surgery (J.R.M., L.M.K., T.L., E.S.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3513, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC (R.H.); School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz (C.C.M.); Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK (K.R.); School of Physics and Astronomy, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Physics Building, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK (N.S.); Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK (M.W.); and Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.v.O., J.T., J.W.)
| | - Maciej A Mazurowski
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.H., L.J.G., J.Y.L.) and Surgery (J.R.M., L.M.K., T.L., E.S.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3513, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC (R.H.); School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz (C.C.M.); Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK (K.R.); School of Physics and Astronomy, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Physics Building, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK (N.S.); Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK (M.W.); and Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.v.O., J.T., J.W.)
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.H., L.J.G., J.Y.L.) and Surgery (J.R.M., L.M.K., T.L., E.S.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3513, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC (R.H.); School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz (C.C.M.); Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK (K.R.); School of Physics and Astronomy, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Physics Building, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK (N.S.); Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK (M.W.); and Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.v.O., J.T., J.W.)
| | - Lorraine M King
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.H., L.J.G., J.Y.L.) and Surgery (J.R.M., L.M.K., T.L., E.S.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3513, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC (R.H.); School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz (C.C.M.); Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK (K.R.); School of Physics and Astronomy, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Physics Building, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK (N.S.); Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK (M.W.); and Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.v.O., J.T., J.W.)
| | - Carlo C Maley
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.H., L.J.G., J.Y.L.) and Surgery (J.R.M., L.M.K., T.L., E.S.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3513, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC (R.H.); School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz (C.C.M.); Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK (K.R.); School of Physics and Astronomy, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Physics Building, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK (N.S.); Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK (M.W.); and Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.v.O., J.T., J.W.)
| | - Thomas Lynch
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.H., L.J.G., J.Y.L.) and Surgery (J.R.M., L.M.K., T.L., E.S.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3513, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC (R.H.); School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz (C.C.M.); Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK (K.R.); School of Physics and Astronomy, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Physics Building, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK (N.S.); Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK (M.W.); and Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.v.O., J.T., J.W.)
| | - Marja van Oirsouw
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.H., L.J.G., J.Y.L.) and Surgery (J.R.M., L.M.K., T.L., E.S.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3513, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC (R.H.); School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz (C.C.M.); Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK (K.R.); School of Physics and Astronomy, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Physics Building, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK (N.S.); Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK (M.W.); and Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.v.O., J.T., J.W.)
| | - Keith Rogers
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.H., L.J.G., J.Y.L.) and Surgery (J.R.M., L.M.K., T.L., E.S.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3513, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC (R.H.); School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz (C.C.M.); Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK (K.R.); School of Physics and Astronomy, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Physics Building, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK (N.S.); Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK (M.W.); and Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.v.O., J.T., J.W.)
| | - Nicholas Stone
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.H., L.J.G., J.Y.L.) and Surgery (J.R.M., L.M.K., T.L., E.S.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3513, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC (R.H.); School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz (C.C.M.); Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK (K.R.); School of Physics and Astronomy, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Physics Building, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK (N.S.); Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK (M.W.); and Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.v.O., J.T., J.W.)
| | - Matthew Wallis
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.H., L.J.G., J.Y.L.) and Surgery (J.R.M., L.M.K., T.L., E.S.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3513, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC (R.H.); School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz (C.C.M.); Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK (K.R.); School of Physics and Astronomy, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Physics Building, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK (N.S.); Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK (M.W.); and Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.v.O., J.T., J.W.)
| | - Jonas Teuwen
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.H., L.J.G., J.Y.L.) and Surgery (J.R.M., L.M.K., T.L., E.S.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3513, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC (R.H.); School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz (C.C.M.); Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK (K.R.); School of Physics and Astronomy, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Physics Building, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK (N.S.); Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK (M.W.); and Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.v.O., J.T., J.W.)
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.H., L.J.G., J.Y.L.) and Surgery (J.R.M., L.M.K., T.L., E.S.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3513, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC (R.H.); School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz (C.C.M.); Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK (K.R.); School of Physics and Astronomy, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Physics Building, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK (N.S.); Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK (M.W.); and Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.v.O., J.T., J.W.)
| | - E Shelley Hwang
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.H., L.J.G., J.Y.L.) and Surgery (J.R.M., L.M.K., T.L., E.S.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3513, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC (R.H.); School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz (C.C.M.); Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK (K.R.); School of Physics and Astronomy, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Physics Building, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK (N.S.); Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK (M.W.); and Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.v.O., J.T., J.W.)
| | - Joseph Y Lo
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.H., L.J.G., J.Y.L.) and Surgery (J.R.M., L.M.K., T.L., E.S.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3513, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC (R.H.); School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz (C.C.M.); Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK (K.R.); School of Physics and Astronomy, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Physics Building, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK (N.S.); Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Center, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK (M.W.); and Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.v.O., J.T., J.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fortunato A, Mallo D, Rupp SM, King LM, Hardman T, Lo JY, Hall A, Marks JR, Hwang ES, Maley CC. A new method to accurately identify single nucleotide variants using small FFPE breast samples. Brief Bioinform 2021; 22:6296507. [PMID: 34117742 PMCID: PMC8574974 DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbab221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Most tissue collections of neoplasms are composed of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) excised tumor samples used for routine diagnostics. DNA sequencing is becoming increasingly important in cancer research and clinical management; however it is difficult to accurately sequence DNA from FFPE samples. We developed and validated a new bioinformatic pipeline to use existing variant-calling strategies to robustly identify somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) from whole exome sequencing using small amounts of DNA extracted from archival FFPE samples of breast cancers. We optimized this strategy using 28 pairs of technical replicates. After optimization, the mean similarity between replicates increased 5-fold, reaching 88% (range 0-100%), with a mean of 21.4 SNVs (range 1-68) per sample, representing a markedly superior performance to existing tools. We found that the SNV-identification accuracy declined when there was less than 40 ng of DNA available and that insertion-deletion variant calls are less reliable than single base substitutions. As the first application of the new algorithm, we compared samples of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast to their adjacent invasive ductal carcinoma samples. We observed an increased number of mutations (paired-samples sign test, P < 0.05), and a higher genetic divergence in the invasive samples (paired-samples sign test, P < 0.01). Our method provides a significant improvement in detecting SNVs in FFPE samples over previous approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Fortunato
- Arizona Cancer Evolution Center, Arizona State University, 1001 S. McAllister Ave., Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.,Biodesign Center for Biocomputing, Security and Society, Arizona State University, 727 E. Tyler St., Tempe, AZ 85281 USA.,School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, 427 East Tyler Mall, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Diego Mallo
- Arizona Cancer Evolution Center, Arizona State University, 1001 S. McAllister Ave., Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.,Biodesign Center for Biocomputing, Security and Society, Arizona State University, 727 E. Tyler St., Tempe, AZ 85281 USA.,School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, 427 East Tyler Mall, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Shawn M Rupp
- Arizona Cancer Evolution Center, Arizona State University, 1001 S. McAllister Ave., Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.,Biodesign Center for Biocomputing, Security and Society, Arizona State University, 727 E. Tyler St., Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
| | | | | | - Joseph Y Lo
- Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Allison Hall
- Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Carlo C Maley
- Arizona Cancer Evolution Center, Arizona State University, 1001 S. McAllister Ave., Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.,Biodesign Center for Biocomputing, Security and Society, Arizona State University, 727 E. Tyler St., Tempe, AZ 85281 USA.,School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, 427 East Tyler Mall, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Narayanan PL, Raza SEA, Hall AH, Marks JR, King L, West RB, Hernandez L, Guppy N, Dowsett M, Gusterson B, Maley C, Hwang ES, Yuan Y. Unmasking the immune microecology of ductal carcinoma in situ with deep learning. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:19. [PMID: 33649333 PMCID: PMC7921670 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-00205-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite increasing evidence supporting the clinical relevance of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in invasive breast cancer, TIL spatial variability within ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) samples and its association with progression are not well understood. To characterise tissue spatial architecture and the microenvironment of DCIS, we designed and validated a new deep learning pipeline, UNMaSk. Following automated detection of individual DCIS ducts using a new method IM-Net, we applied spatial tessellation to create virtual boundaries for each duct. To study local TIL infiltration for each duct, DRDIN was developed for mapping the distribution of TILs. In a dataset comprising grade 2-3 pure DCIS and DCIS adjacent to invasive cancer (adjacent DCIS), we found that pure DCIS cases had more TILs compared to adjacent DCIS. However, the colocalisation of TILs with DCIS ducts was significantly lower in pure DCIS compared to adjacent DCIS, which may suggest a more inflamed tissue ecology local to DCIS ducts in adjacent DCIS cases. Our study demonstrates that technological developments in deep convolutional neural networks and digital pathology can enable an automated morphological and microenvironmental analysis of DCIS, providing a new way to study differential immune ecology for individual ducts and identify new markers of progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Lakshmi Narayanan
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - Shan E Ahmed Raza
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Allison H Hall
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lorraine King
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Robert B West
- Department of Pathology, Surgical Pathology, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Lucia Hernandez
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Naomi Guppy
- Breast Cancer Now Histopathology Core, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- UCL Advanced Diagnostics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mitch Dowsett
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Academic Department of Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Barry Gusterson
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Carlo Maley
- Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - E Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ryser MD, Sorribes IC, Greenwald M, Wu E, Hall A, Mallo D, King LM, Hardman T, Simpson L, Maley CC, Marks JR, Shibata D, Hwang ES. Abstract PR02: Inferring the evolutionary dynamics of ductal carcinoma in situ through multi-regional sequencing and mathematical modeling. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.tumhet2020-pr02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction. The natural history of preinvasive breast cancer, or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains poorly understood. Overcoming this gap would allow risk-appropriate treatment for patients diagnosed with DCIS. We used a multiregional sequencing approach in combination with mathematical modeling to characterize the evolutionary dynamics of DCIS initiation and progression. Methods. We analyzed a cohort of 18 patients diagnosed with DCIS, either with (n=9) or without (n=9) synchronous invasive cancer. Based on whole exome sequencing, tumor-specific mutation panels were constructed, each targeting 29-75 mutations (median: 60). From each tumor, and using selective ultraviolet radiation fractionation (SURF), we microdissected small spots (encompassing 1-3 duct cross-sections) from 3-4 spatially separated microscope sections (mean slide separation: 1.25cm, range: 0.34-6.0cm). Spots were spatially registered and genotyped based on targeted sequencing of the tumor-specific mutation panels. For each tumor, we performed unsupervised clonal deconvolution of the spot genotypes (CloneFinder) and constructed phylogenetic subclone trees. To quantify the spatial patterns of subclonal mutations, we introduced a dispersion index (DI), ranging from low (DI=0%) to high (DI=100%). To provide a spatio-temporal context for the heterogeneity patterns we developed a family of stochastic mathematical models of DCIS initiation and progression. Thereby, we embedded the evolutionary dynamics of tumor cell expansion in the branching topology of mammary ductal trees. Results. A total of 485 microdissected spots (median per tumor: 23, range: 10-50) were spatially registered and sequenced (median depth: 9,000x). All tumors were multiclonal, containing a median of 5 subclones (range: 2-14). Surprisingly, the correlation between spatial and genomic distances of spots was low. Individual subclones were diffusely dispersed across tumors. DCIS with synchronous DCIS and invasive cancer (mixed DCIS) had a higher mutation dispersion (DI=84.7%) than those without (pure DCIS, DI=70.5%; p=0.03, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Mixed DCIS also had a higher fraction of spots containing more than one subclone than pure DCIS (median: 30.4% vs 0%, p=0.03). Among 7 mixed DCIS with invasive spots, 5 showed evidence of multiclonal invasion, that is more than one invading subclones were found in both in situ and invasive regions of the tumor. Mathematical modeling analyses show that the observed spatial patterns of genetic heterogeneity are consistent with a single expansion of mixing subclones across the ductal tree architecture. Conclusions. Our findings provide novel insights into the early growth and invasion dynamics of DCIS lesions. Further, we identified potential evolutionary markers for the delineation between indolent (pure) and aggressive (mixed) DCIS. This constitutes an important step towards identification of patients with low-risk DCIS who could be appropriately managed with less aggressive treatment.
Citation Format: Marc D. Ryser, Inmaculada C. Sorribes, Matthew Greenwald, Ethan Wu, Allison Hall, Diego Mallo, Lorraine M. King, Timothy Hardman, Lunden Simpson, Carlo C. Maley, Jeffrey R. Marks, Darryl Shibata, E. Shelley Hwang. Inferring the evolutionary dynamics of ductal carcinoma in situ through multi-regional sequencing and mathematical modeling [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Tumor Heterogeneity: From Single Cells to Clinical Impact; 2020 Sep 17-18. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(21 Suppl):Abstract nr PR02.
Collapse
|
28
|
Fortunato A, Mallo D, King L, Hardman T, Hall A, Marks JR, Hwang SS, Maley CC. Abstract 2502: Genetic and functional heterogeneity of DCIS as predictors of invasive cancer. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-2502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Genetic diversity both between and within individual tumors constitutes a challenge to personalized cancer medicine. Intra-tumor heterogeneity provides the genetic fuel for natural selection in clonal evolution and cancer progression. Tumors with high levels of genetic heterogeneity are hypothesized to be more likely to demonstrate aggressive behavior and progress to invasion and metastasis.
We analyzed the mutational loads from separate areas of pure DCIS and compared this to genetic heterogeneity in DCIS lesions found adjacent to invasive and metastatic cancer. Two spatially distinct areas of DCIS from each case were macro-dissected and the DNA extracted from FFPE samples. To analyze the data, we developed new bioinformatics methods that allowed analysis of small amounts of degraded DNA extracted from FFPE samples across multiple regions. Our bioinformatics pipeline was optimized on a series of 28 independent technical replicates of the same DNA sample sequenced twice, as training tools to find the best filtering parameters.
Whole exome sequencing was performed on each of the two geospatially separated samples for each case. Minimum coverage for inclusion in this study was 40X over at least 50% of the exome. We used the ratio of private mutations (only in 1 area) to public (found in both areas) mutations as a measure of intra-tumor heterogeneity.
We present an approach to measure clonal heterogeneity using a bulk sequencing strategy applied to geospatially distinct foci of DCIS. We found statistically significant difference between DCIS adjacent to invasive disease and metastatic patients' genetic divergence (t-test, p=0.013). Our findings suggest that genetic and functional heterogeneity may play an important evolutionary role as a driver for invasive progression.
Citation Format: Angelo Fortunato, Diego Mallo, Lorraine King, Timothy Hardman, Allison Hall, Jeffrey R. Marks, Shelley Shelley Hwang, Carlo C. Maley. Genetic and functional heterogeneity of DCIS as predictors of invasive cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 2502.
Collapse
|
29
|
Adams D, Lin SH, Pass HI, Chumsri S, Lapidus RG, Edelman M, Bergan RC, Tsai S, Aft R, Pillai S, Watson M, Kim AK, Chikamatsu K, Hayashi M, Loeb DM, Pinto NR, Alpaugh RK, Tang CM, Ho TH, Marks JR. Circulating stromal cells as a potential blood-based biomarker for screening invasive solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.3535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3535 Background: Peripheral blood allows for a simple non-invasive method for isolating various cancer associated circulating stromal cells (CStCs) which may predict for cancer presence. Cancer Associated Macrophage-Like cells (CAMLs), a specific CStC, are phagocytic myeloid cells that derive from an immunological response to cancer and emanate from primary tumors. Using a filtration platform we screened the peripheral blood of untreated newly diagnosed cancer patients (n = 308) for CAMLs. In parallel, we screened patients with newly diagnosed non-malignant diseases, i.e. lupus, benign cysts, etc. (n = 39), and healthy control samples (n = 76). We found that CAMLs are highly prevalent (87%) in the blood of cancer patients, but uncommon in non-malignant conditions (20%) & absent in healthy individuals (0%). Methods: Anonymized peripheral blood were taken from 308 cancer patients after confirmation of invasive malignancy [stage I (n = 76), stage II (n = 73), stage III (n = 72), stage IV (n = 65) and unstaged non-metastatic (n = 22)] with pathologically confirmed lung (n = 65), pancreas (n = 53), breast (n = 52), prostate (n = 40), esophageal (n = 30), renal cell (n = 18), hepatocellular (n = 15), neuroblastoma (n = 10), melanoma (n = 8), and other (n = 17). Further, anonymized blood was taken from patients with untreated non-malignant conditions including benign breast masses (n = 19), lupus (n = 11), liver cirrhosis (n = 5), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (n = 3), and viral infection (n = 1); or from healthy control volunteers (n = 76). CAMLs were isolated from whole peripheral blood by the CellSieve™ microfiltration technique and defined as enlarged, multinuclear cells with cytokeratin and/or CD45/CD14 positive. Results: CAMLs were found in 87% of all cancer patients regardless of stage, ~5.4 CAMLs/7.5mL blood. Specifically, CAMLs were found in 80% of Stage I, 90% Stage II, 89% Stage III, and 97% Stage IV patients. No CAMLs were found in any healthy controls, but were found in 26% of benign breast masses, 18% of lupus, 0% of BPH and 0% of cirrhosis. In total, CAML sensitivity in cancer vs healthy was 87% (CI95% 82-90%), specificity = 100% (CI95% 95-100%), PPV = 100% (CI95% 100%), NPV = 67% (CI95% 58-71%). CAML sensitivity in cancer vs benign was 87% (CI95% 82-90%), specificity = 80% (CI95% 64-91%), PPV = 97% (CI95% 95-98%), NPV = 43% (CI95% 35-51%). Conclusions: CAMLs, a Circulating Stromal Cell subtype, is a sensitive blood based biomarker found in all stages of cancer that is rare in non-malignant conditions and absent in healthy individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Steven H. Lin
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Rena G. Lapidus
- University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | - Susan Tsai
- Medical College of Wisconsin and Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI
| | | | | | - Mark Watson
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Amy K. Kim
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Force JM, Taylor ML, Drusbosky L, Yen J, Marcom PK, Anders CK, Marks JR. Identification of pathogenic ROS1 alterations in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.1031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
1031 Background: ROS1 is an important proto-oncogene involved in the development of various cancers for which we have FDA approved therapies. While activation of the ROS1 tyrosine kinase receptor has been reported in 1-2% of lung cancers, the frequency and type of ROS1 alterations in breast cancer have not been fully explored. We previously described the incidence of ROS1 alterations from breast cancer tissue. The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence of ROS1 genomic alterations occurring in cfDNA from patients with breast cancer. Methods: We queried 16,053 breast cancer samples from the Guardant Health breast cancer database between June 2015 - October 2019 to identify the incidence of ROS1 alterations detected in cfDNA in breast cancer. We identified fusion partner genes and classified each alteration type into the following categories: fusion, single nucleotide variants (SNVs), and indels. Radical amino acid changes occurring at conserved regions across the ROS1 gene were identified. In vitro analyses were used to investigate the effect of ROS1 nonsynonymous mutations on the ROS1 protein. We made associations with ROS1 alterations and co-occurring mutated genes. Results: Nonsynonymous ROS1 alterations from the Guardant Health breast cancer database were found in 162 samples from 142 patients in the 16,053-patient cohort (1%). Alterations found included: 1 (0.6%) ROS1-SLC35F1 fusion, 155 (95.7%) SNVs, and 6 (3.7%) indels. Of the 155 SNVs, we identified 23 (14.8%) mutations occurring in the ROS1 kinase, of which, 20 (12.9%) occurred at highly conserved regions and 15 (9.6%) harbored radical amino acid changes. The top 5 co-occurring mutations in samples with ROS1 alterations were TP53 (50%), PIK3CA (44%), ESR1 (27%), EGFR (21%), and FGFR1 (18%). Conclusions: A modest incidence of ROS1 genomic alterations occurs in cfDNA from patients with breast cancer. New somatic alterations in the ROS1 gene were identified from Guardant Health that were not detected in publicly available databases. A portion of mutations occurred at highly conserved regions across the ROS1 gene suggesting these may be more actionable than currently recognized. In vitro analyses of ROS1 gene activation from these newly discovered somatic alterations are being investigated with results to be reported. Co-occurring mutations reveal a unique genotype associated with ROS1 alterations that may play a biologic role in ROS1-mediated pathogenesis.
Collapse
|
31
|
Ryser MD, Mallo D, Hall A, Hardman T, King LM, Tatishchev S, Sorribes IC, Maley CC, Marks JR, Hwang ES, Shibata D. Minimal barriers to invasion during human colorectal tumor growth. Nat Commun 2020; 11:1280. [PMID: 32152322 PMCID: PMC7062901 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14908-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Intra-tumoral heterogeneity (ITH) could represent clonal evolution where subclones with greater fitness confer more malignant phenotypes and invasion constitutes an evolutionary bottleneck. Alternatively, ITH could represent branching evolution with invasion of multiple subclones. The two models respectively predict a hierarchy of subclones arranged by phenotype, or multiple subclones with shared phenotypes. We delineate these modes of invasion by merging ancestral, topographic, and phenotypic information from 12 human colorectal tumors (11 carcinomas, 1 adenoma) obtained through saturation microdissection of 325 small tumor regions. The majority of subclones (29/46, 60%) share superficial and invasive phenotypes. Of 11 carcinomas, 9 show evidence of multiclonal invasion, and invasive and metastatic subclones arise early along the ancestral trees. Early multiclonal invasion in the majority of these tumors indicates the expansion of co-evolving subclones with similar malignant potential in absence of late bottlenecks and suggests that barriers to invasion are minimal during colorectal cancer growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc D Ryser
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Diego Mallo
- Arizona Cancer Evolution Center and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Allison Hall
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Timothy Hardman
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lorraine M King
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sergei Tatishchev
- Department of Pathology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Carlo C Maley
- Arizona Cancer Evolution Center and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - E Shelley Hwang
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Darryl Shibata
- Department of Pathology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Angel PM, Saunders J, Jensen-Smith H, Bruner E, Ford ME, Berkhiser S, Boxall B, Bethard J, Ball LE, Yeh ES, Hollingsworth MA, Mehta AS, Marks JR, Nakshatri H, Drake RR. Abstract P2-10-18: Deciphering racial disparities in breast cancer collagen reorganization by targeted extracellular matrix proteomics. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p2-10-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Although European American women have a higher incidence of breast cancer, African American women have higher mortality rates with increased occurrence of lethal cancers at a younger age. Breast density, characterized by increases in stroma, is a risk factor for breast cancer and African American women have significantly greater odds of high breast density compared to European American women. Genomic profiling of breast cancer by ancestry shows that stromal collagen type genes vary based on African and European ancestry and correlate to differences in breast cancer progression and survival. Contemporary scientific literature describes breast cancer progression as being linked to a “collagen switch” whereby collagen fibers surrounding the tumor are re-organized during later tumor growth to facilitate metastatic spread of cancer activated fibroblasts. However, mechanisms facilitating the “collagen switch” remain mostly unknown, especially at a translational level. Additionally, collagen re-organization has not yet been evaluated for contributions to racial disparities in breast cancer. Our novel extracellular matrix proteomic studies on 17 patient lumpectomies depict that very specific sites on collagen protein types in breast tumor are post-translationally regulated by hydroxylation of proline (HYP) dependent on race (7 African American, 10 European American; no significant age or receptor status difference). By proteomic sequencing, distinct peptide sequences of collagen 1A1, collagen 1A2, and collagen 3A1 are modified by HYP and are significantly regulated when measured in African American versus European American breast tumors. From 16 collagen type proteins, 143 collagen peptides from all breast tumors were identified with HYP modifications (site probability ≥0.95). A total of 16% of the HYP peptides were unique to African American breast tumors. Imaging mass spectrometry that targets collagens reported that specific peptides sequences showed increased hydroxylation of proline in tumors compared to normal adjacent tissue. Interestingly, but not unexpected, translational and post-translational regulation did not always correlate with transcriptional regulation. Investigation on over 300 tissue microarray cores of breast tumor by second harmonic generation microscopy demonstrated significant ancestry-defined regulation of collagen fibers. For example, compared to breast tumor tissue cores of European American ancestry, African American breast tumor tissue cancer cores showed significant overall increases in collagen fibril length with decreased collagen fibril straightness (two-tailed student’s t-test p-value <0.05). Imaging mass spectrometry that targets collagens done on the identical set of 300 ancestry-defined tissue microarray cores supports that ancestry of breast tumor correlates with site specific collagen modification by hydroxylation of prolines. For instance, COL3A1 peptide GPAGIPx GFPx shows a nearly 3-fold increase in African American breast tumors compared to European breast tumors (Mann-Whitney p-value ≤0.02; area under the receiver operating curve 0.81, p-value ≤0.0001; HYP site probability of 1.00 for each proline designated Px). Since HYP stabilizes collagen triple helices, we hypothesize that HYP alteration at specific sites in collagen protein types from African American breast tumors may reflect a change in collagen flexibility that contributes to an earlier metastatic collagen switch than in European American breast tumors. Current work determines ancestry-related changes in collagen fibers per breast cancer type and per normal adjacent tissue. To summarize, we provide the first evidence that post-translational regulation of collagen types may contribute to racial disparities in breast cancer.
Citation Format: Peggi M Angel, Janet Saunders, Heather Jensen-Smith, Evelyn Bruner, Marvella E. Ford, Savanna Berkhiser, Baylye Boxall, Jennifer Bethard, Lauren E. Ball, Elizabeth S. Yeh, Michael A. Hollingsworth, Anand S. Mehta, Jeffrey R. Marks, Harikrishna Nakshatri, Richard R. Drake. Deciphering racial disparities in breast cancer collagen reorganization by targeted extracellular matrix proteomics [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-10-18.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peggi M Angel
- 1Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | | | | | - Evelyn Bruner
- 1Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | | | | | - Baylye Boxall
- 1Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rosenberg SM, Hendrix LH, Schreiber KL, Thompson AM, Bedrosian I, Hughes KS, Lynch T, Basila D, Collyar DE, Frank ES, Darai S, Lanahan C, Marks JR, Plichta JK, Hyslop T, Partridge AH, Hwang ES. Abstract P1-21-07: The Patient-reported Outcomes after Routine Treatment of Atypical Lesions (PORTAL) study: Pain, psychosocial wellbeing, and quality of life among women undergoing guideline concordant care for DCIS vs. active surveillance for in situ and atypical lesions. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p1-21-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Guideline-concordant care (GCC) for DCIS includes surgery, radiation, and endocrine treatment. Active surveillance (AS) is a strategy under study for management of low risk DCIS. The PORTAL Study was designed to evaluate patient reported outcomes (PROs) after GCC for DCIS compared to women who received AS for DCIS combined with women with a history of other atypical lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), or atypical lobular hyperplasia/lobular carcinoma in situ (LN), as proxies for AS-managed DCIS. Methods: The PORTAL Study invited women age≥ 18, diagnosed with DCIS, ADH, or LN between 2012-2017 from 4 academic centers to complete a one-time, cross-sectional survey. Clinical, pathological, and treatment information was obtained from medical record review. The primary outcome was breast/chest wall pain assessed with the Breast Cancer Pain Questionnaire (BCPQ) including severity (10-point scale, ≥3=clinically relevant), a Pain Burden Index (PBI), which is a composite of severity, frequency, and location (breast, arm, side, axilla) and assessments of sensory disturbances, and impact of pain on emotional and physical functioning. Additional PROs included measures of generalized pain (Brief Pain Inventory), anxiety (STAI-Short Form), depression (CES-D), and QOL (Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors). Pain, psychosocial, and QOL outcomes were compared between the GCC vs. AS groups using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Chi-Square tests. Results: Of 1565 patients invited and sent a survey, 927 (59%) responded to the survey with evaluable pain outcome data. Median time from diagnosis was 3.8 years. Median age at survey completion was 58 (range: 26-94) years; 13% identified as non-White; 4% Hispanic. Among those with DCIS (n=554), 97% had GCC (62%, lumpectomy, 38%, mastectomy; 48%, radiation), representing 58% of participants vs 42% representing AS. The prevalence of clinically relevant pain was higher in the GCC vs. AS group (16.5% vs 9%, p=.0009). Median BCPQ-PBI, sensory disturbance, physical, and emotional impact scores were all higher (p<.0001) in the GCC vs. AS group (Table); BPI scores for pain severity and interference were similar between groups. QOL, anxiety and depressive symptoms were similar among women who had GCC compared to the AS group. Conclusion: Women with DCIS who have undergone GCC experience more breast/chest wall pain and report greater impact of pain on physical and emotional functioning in long term follow-up, compared to women who have undergone AS for DCIS or are managed for other atypical lesions. Given that many women with low risk DCIS may be unlikely to develop invasive cancer, improved understanding of the potential trade-offs of GCC vs AS can help support informed decision making in women with DCIS who are considering their treatment options. Ongoing prospective trials will provide further information regarding risks and benefits of AS vs GCC for women with low risk DCIS.
BCPQ Scores, GCC vs. ASGCCASMean (range)Median (IQR)Mean (range)Median (IQR)p*PBI6.4 (0-80)0 (0-9)2.9 (0-64)0 (0-0)<.0001Sensory disturbance1.4 (0-9)0 (0-2)0.6 (0-9)0 (0-0)<.0001Physical impact9.6 (0-67)0 (0-19)4.4 (0-56)0 (0-0)<.0001Emotional impact1.4 (0-33)0 (0-1)0.6 (0-38)0 (0-0)<.0001*Wilcoxon rank sum test comparing median scores
Citation Format: Shoshana M Rosenberg, Laura H Hendrix, Kristin L Schreiber, Alastair M Thompson, Isabelle Bedrosian, Kevin S Hughes, Thomas Lynch, Desiree Basila, Deborah E Collyar, Elizabeth S Frank, Sonja Darai, Conor Lanahan, Jeffrey R Marks, Jennifer K Plichta, Terry Hyslop, Ann H Partridge, E. Shelley Hwang. The Patient-reported Outcomes after Routine Treatment of Atypical Lesions (PORTAL) study: Pain, psychosocial wellbeing, and quality of life among women undergoing guideline concordant care for DCIS vs. active surveillance for in situ and atypical lesions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-21-07.
Collapse
|
34
|
Cocce KJ, Jasper JS, Desautels TK, Everett L, Wardell S, Westerling T, Baldi R, Wright TM, Tavares K, Yllanes A, Bae Y, Blitzer JT, Logsdon C, Rakiec DP, Ruddy DA, Jiang T, Broadwater G, Hyslop T, Hall A, Laine M, Phung L, Greene GL, Martin LA, Pancholi S, Dowsett M, Detre S, Marks JR, Crawford GE, Brown M, Norris JD, Chang CY, McDonnell DP. The Lineage Determining Factor GRHL2 Collaborates with FOXA1 to Establish a Targetable Pathway in Endocrine Therapy-Resistant Breast Cancer. Cell Rep 2019; 29:889-903.e10. [PMID: 31644911 PMCID: PMC6874102 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2017] [Revised: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Notwithstanding the positive clinical impact of endocrine therapies in estrogen receptor-alpha (ERα)-positive breast cancer, de novo and acquired resistance limits the therapeutic lifespan of existing drugs. Taking the position that resistance is nearly inevitable, we undertook a study to identify and exploit targetable vulnerabilities that were manifest in endocrine therapy-resistant disease. Using cellular and mouse models of endocrine therapy-sensitive and endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer, together with contemporary discovery platforms, we identified a targetable pathway that is composed of the transcription factors FOXA1 and GRHL2, a coregulated target gene, the membrane receptor LYPD3, and the LYPD3 ligand, AGR2. Inhibition of the activity of this pathway using blocking antibodies directed against LYPD3 or AGR2 inhibits the growth of endocrine therapy-resistant tumors in mice, providing the rationale for near-term clinical development of humanized antibodies directed against these proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly J Cocce
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Jeff S Jasper
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Taylor K Desautels
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Logan Everett
- Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - Suzanne Wardell
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Thomas Westerling
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Robert Baldi
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Tricia M Wright
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Kendall Tavares
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Alex Yllanes
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Yeeun Bae
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | - Craig Logsdon
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA
| | - Daniel P Rakiec
- Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Oncology Disease Area, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - David A Ruddy
- Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Oncology Disease Area, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Tiancong Jiang
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Gloria Broadwater
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Terry Hyslop
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Allison Hall
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Muriel Laine
- The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Linda Phung
- The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Geoffrey L Greene
- The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Lesley-Ann Martin
- Breast Cancer Now, Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Sunil Pancholi
- Breast Cancer Now, Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Mitch Dowsett
- Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Simone Detre
- Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Gregory E Crawford
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Myles Brown
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - John D Norris
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Ching-Yi Chang
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Donald P McDonnell
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hou R, Mazurowski MA, Grimm LJ, Marks JR, King LM, Maley CC, Hwang ESS, Lo JY. Prediction of Upstaged Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Using Forced Labeling and Domain Adaptation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2019; 67:1565-1572. [PMID: 31502960 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2019.2940195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this study is to use adjunctive classes to improve a predictive model whose performance is limited by the common problems of small numbers of primary cases, high feature dimensionality, and poor class separability. Specifically, our clinical task is to use mammographic features to predict whether ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) identified at needle core biopsy will be later upstaged or shown to contain invasive breast cancer. METHODS To improve the prediction of pure DCIS (negative) versus upstaged DCIS (positive) cases, this study considers the adjunctive roles of two related classes: atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), a non-cancer type of breast abnormity, and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), with 113 computer vision based mammographic features extracted from each case. To improve the baseline Model A's classification of pure vs. upstaged DCIS, we designed three different strategies (Models B, C, D) with different ways of embedding features or inputs. RESULTS Based on ROC analysis, the baseline Model A performed with AUC of 0.614 (95% CI, 0.496-0.733). All three new models performed better than the baseline, with domain adaptation (Model D) performing the best with an AUC of 0.697 (95% CI, 0.595-0.797). CONCLUSION We improved the prediction performance of DCIS upstaging by embedding two related pathology classes in different training phases. SIGNIFICANCE The three new strategies of embedding related class data all outperformed the baseline model, thus demonstrating not only feature similarities among these different classes, but also the potential for improving classification by using other related classes.
Collapse
|
36
|
Hu Q, Li C, Wang S, Li Y, Wen B, Zhang Y, Liang K, Yao J, Ye Y, Hsiao H, Nguyen TK, Park PK, Egranov SD, Hawke DH, Marks JR, Han L, Hung MC, Zhang B, Lin C, Yang L. LncRNAs-directed PTEN enzymatic switch governs epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cell Res 2019; 29:286-304. [PMID: 30631154 PMCID: PMC6461864 DOI: 10.1038/s41422-018-0134-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the structural conservation of PTEN with dual-specificity phosphatases, there have been no reports regarding the regulatory mechanisms that underlie this potential dual-phosphatase activity. Here, we report that K27-linked polyubiquitination of PTEN at lysines 66 and 80 switches its phosphoinositide/protein tyrosine phosphatase activity to protein serine/threonine phosphatase activity. Mechanistically, high glucose, TGF-β, CTGF, SHH, and IL-6 induce the expression of a long non-coding RNA, GAEA (Glucose Aroused for EMT Activation), which associates with an RNA-binding E3 ligase, MEX3C, and enhances its enzymatic activity, leading to the K27-linked polyubiquitination of PTEN. The MEX3C-catalyzed PTENK27-polyUb activates its protein serine/threonine phosphatase activity and inhibits its phosphatidylinositol/protein tyrosine phosphatase activity. With this altered enzymatic activity, PTENK27-polyUb dephosphorylates the phosphoserine/threonine residues of TWIST1, SNAI1, and YAP1, leading to accumulation of these master regulators of EMT. Animals with genetic inhibition of PTENK27-polyUb, by a single nucleotide mutation generated using CRISPR/Cas9 (PtenK80R/K80R), exhibit inhibition of EMT markers during mammary gland morphogenesis in pregnancy/lactation and during cutaneous wound healing processes. Our findings illustrate an unexpected paradigm in which the lncRNA-dependent switch in PTEN protein serine/threonine phosphatase activity is important for physiological homeostasis and disease development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingsong Hu
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Chunlai Li
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Shouyu Wang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Yajuan Li
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Bo Wen
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yanyan Zhang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Institute of Immunology, Third Military Medical University, 400038, Chongqing, China
| | - Ke Liang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jun Yao
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Youqiong Ye
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGroven Medical School, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Heidi Hsiao
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Tina K Nguyen
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Peter K Park
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Sergey D Egranov
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - David H Hawke
- Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Leng Han
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGroven Medical School, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Mien-Chie Hung
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Program in Cancer Biology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Bing Zhang
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Chunru Lin
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
- Program in Cancer Biology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Liuqing Yang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
- Program in Cancer Biology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
- Center for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNAs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Fackler MJ, Cho SS, Cope LM, Gabrielson E, Wilsbach K, Lynch C, Marks JR, Geradts J, Regan MM, Viale G, Wolff AC, Umbricht CB, Sukumar S. Abstract P4-08-09: DNA methylation markers predict recurrence-free interval in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p4-08-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Chemotherapy remains the treatment mainstay for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Nevertheless, randomized trials have shown that not all TNBC require it, nor does it benefit all patients that receive it. Molecular tools to risk-stratify TNBC are currently lacking. In light of the importance of epigenetic processes modulating gene expression, we performed an array-based genome-wide DNA methylation search in well-documented institutional and clinical trial cohorts of TNBC for markers that can distinguish breast cancers with a favorable natural history from those with a high risk of recurrence.
METHODS. We performed an array-based genome-wide DNA methylation survey of well-documented institutional and clinical trial cohorts of TNBC and conducted molecular marker discovery on institutional TNBCs (115 patient samples; 53 recurrences) treated by locoregional therapy (LRT) alone. The identified hypermethylated gene signatures were then tested in a TNBC cohort (50 patient samples; 16 recurrences) from the no chemotherapy arms of IBCSG trials VIII and IX, and in a separate combined cohort of TNBCs (131 patient samples; 33 recurrences) treated with chemotherapy from an institutional repository and from IBCSG trials VIII and IX. Cross platform validation was conducted using quantitative multiplexed methylation specific PCR (QM-MSP) on hypermethylated markers in samples from both the Discovery Set and IBCSG LRT Test Set.
RESULTS. We identified methylation signatures in the discovery cohort consisting of 100 or 30 CpG probes that discriminated patients who remained recurrence-free from those with recurrent disease. These signatures were then tested in the IBCSG no chemotherapy cohort, and we found that hypermethylation was associated with shorter recurrence-free interval (RFI). A significant association of both 100 CpG (P<0.0001) and 30 CpG (P=0.0021) signatures with shorter RFI was found in the combined institutional and IBCSG chemotherapy cohort. We observed an enrichment of methylation probes residing on chromosome 19, particularly within 19q13.41-43, that significantly correlated with RFI following chemotherapy. QM-MSP results reflected that of the methylation array [Spearman correlation coefficient of r = 0.495 (P = 0.0009)] indicating that the relationship between high methylation and short RFI is detectable independent of analytical platform. We also observed enrichment for Chromosome 19-specific probes within the 100 and 30 probe sets. While only 5% of all CpG markers are located within Chr19, 15% of the 100 CpG set, 37% of the 30 CpG set, and 47% of the 17 CpGs that are statistically significantly correlated with RFI in the chemotherapy group reside on the Chr19, mostly within 19q13.41-43.
CONCLUSIONS. Methylation markers may be of prognostic importance in TNBC and our findings should be validated in additional clinical trial cohorts.
Citation Format: Fackler MJ, Cho SS, Cope LM, Gabrielson E, Wilsbach K, Lynch C, Marks JR, Geradts J, Regan MM, Viale G, Wolff AC, Umbricht CB, Sukumar S. DNA methylation markers predict recurrence-free interval in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-08-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MJ Fackler
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - SS Cho
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - LM Cope
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - E Gabrielson
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - K Wilsbach
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - C Lynch
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - JR Marks
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - J Geradts
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - MM Regan
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - G Viale
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - AC Wolff
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - CB Umbricht
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - S Sukumar
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mazurowski MA, Saha A, Harowicz MR, Cain EH, Marks JR, Marcom PK. Association of distant recurrence-free survival with algorithmically extracted MRI characteristics in breast cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 49:e231-e240. [PMID: 30672045 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Revised: 12/23/2018] [Accepted: 12/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While important in diagnosis of breast cancer, the scientific assessment of the role of imaging in prognosis of outcomes and treatment planning is limited. PURPOSE To evaluate the potential of using quantitative imaging variables for stratifying risk of distant recurrence in breast cancer patients. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. POPULATION In all, 892 female invasive breast cancer patients. SEQUENCE Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with field strength 1.5 T and 3 T. ASSESSMENT Computer vision algorithms were applied to extract a comprehensive set of 529 imaging features quantifying size, shape, enhancement patterns, and heterogeneity of the tumors and the surrounding tissue. Using a development set with 446 cases, we selected 20 imaging features with high prognostic value. STATISTICAL TESTS We evaluated the imaging features using an independent test set with 446 cases. The principal statistical measure was a concordance index between individual imaging features and patient distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS). RESULTS The strongest association with DRFS that persisted after controlling for known prognostic clinical and pathology variables was found for signal enhancement ratio (SER) partial tumor volume (concordance index [C] = 0.768, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.679-0.856), tumor major axis length (C = 0.742, 95% CI: 0.650-0.834), kurtosis of the SER map within tumor (C = 0.640, 95% CI: 0.521-0.760), tumor cluster shade (C = 0.313, 95% CI: 0.216-0.410), and washin rate information measure of correlation (C = 0.702, 95% CI: 0.601-0.803). DATA CONCLUSION Quantitative assessment of breast cancer features seen in a routine breast MRI might be able to be used for assessment of risk of distant recurrence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 6 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej A Mazurowski
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ashirbani Saha
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael R Harowicz
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Elizabeth Hope Cain
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - P Kelly Marcom
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Saha A, Harowicz MR, Cain EH, Hall AH, Hwang ESS, Marks JR, Marcom PK, Mazurowski MA. Intra-tumor molecular heterogeneity in breast cancer: definitions of measures and association with distant recurrence-free survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 172:123-132. [PMID: 29992418 PMCID: PMC6588400 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4879-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to define quantitative measures of intra-tumor heterogeneity in breast cancer based on histopathology data gathered from multiple samples on individual patients and determine their association with distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS). METHODS We collected data from 971 invasive breast cancers, from 1st January 2000 to 23rd March 2014, that underwent repeat tumor sampling at our institution. We defined and calculated 31 measures of intra-tumor heterogeneity including ER, PR, and HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC), proliferation, EGFR IHC, grade, and histology. For each heterogeneity measure, Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine whether patients with heterogeneous disease had different distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) than those with homogeneous disease. RESULTS The presence of heterogeneity in ER percentage staining was prognostic of reduced DRFS with a hazard ratio of 4.26 (95% CI 2.22-8.18, p < 0.00002). It remained significant after controlling for the ER status itself (p < 0.00062) and for patients that had chemotherapy (p < 0.00032). Most of the heterogeneity measures did not show any association with DRFS despite the considerable sample size. CONCLUSIONS Intra-tumor heterogeneity of ER receptor status may be a predictor of patient DRFS. Histopathologic data from multiple tissue samples may offer a view of tumor heterogeneity and assess recurrence risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashirbani Saha
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, 2424 Erwin Road, Suite 302, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
| | - Michael R Harowicz
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Elizabeth Hope Cain
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Allison H Hall
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Eun-Sil Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Paul Kelly Marcom
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Maciej A Mazurowski
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Duke University Medical Physics Program, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Sang LJ, Ju HQ, Liu GP, Tian T, Ma GL, Lu YX, Liu ZX, Pan RL, Li RH, Piao HL, Marks JR, Yang LJ, Yan Q, Wang W, Shao J, Zhou Y, Zhou T, Lin A. LncRNA CamK-A Regulates Ca 2+-Signaling-Mediated Tumor Microenvironment Remodeling. Mol Cell 2018; 72:601. [PMID: 30388414 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
41
|
Cain EH, Saha A, Harowicz MR, Marks JR, Marcom PK, Mazurowski MA. Multivariate machine learning models for prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer using MRI features: a study using an independent validation set. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 173:455-463. [PMID: 30328048 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4990-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether a multivariate machine learning-based model using computer-extracted features of pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) can predict pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in breast cancer patients. METHODS Institutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective study of 288 breast cancer patients at our institution who received NAT and had a pre-treatment breast MRI. A comprehensive set of 529 radiomic features was extracted from each patient's pre-treatment MRI. The patients were divided into equal groups to form a training set and an independent test set. Two multivariate machine learning models (logistic regression and a support vector machine) based on imaging features were trained to predict pCR in (a) all patients with NAT, (b) patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and (c) triple-negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (TN/HER2+) patients who had NAT. The multivariate models were tested using the independent test set, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS Out of the 288 patients, 64 achieved pCR. The AUC values for predicting pCR in TN/HER+ patients who received NAT were significant (0.707, 95% CI 0.582-0.833, p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS The multivariate models based on pre-treatment MRI features were able to predict pCR in TN/HER2+ patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Hope Cain
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
| | - Ashirbani Saha
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Michael R Harowicz
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.,Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - P Kelly Marcom
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Maciej A Mazurowski
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sang LJ, Ju HQ, Liu GP, Tian T, Ma GL, Lu YX, Liu ZX, Pan RL, Li RH, Piao HL, Marks JR, Yang LJ, Yan Q, Wang W, Shao J, Zhou Y, Zhou T, Lin A. LncRNA CamK-A Regulates Ca 2+-Signaling-Mediated Tumor Microenvironment Remodeling. Mol Cell 2018; 72:71-83.e7. [PMID: 30220561 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Revised: 06/30/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Cancer cells entail metabolic adaptation and microenvironmental remodeling to survive and progress. Both calcium (Ca2+) flux and Ca2+-dependent signaling play a crucial role in this process, although the underlying mechanism has yet to be elucidated. Through RNA screening, we identified one long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) named CamK-A (lncRNA for calcium-dependent kinase activation) in tumorigenesis. CamK-A is highly expressed in multiple human cancers and involved in cancer microenvironment remodeling via activation of Ca2+-triggered signaling. Mechanistically, CamK-A activates Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase PNCK, which in turn phosphorylates IκBα and triggers calcium-dependent nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) activation. This regulation results in the tumor microenvironment remodeling, including macrophage recruitment, angiogenesis, and tumor progression. Notably, our human-patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model studies demonstrate that targeting CamK-A robustly impaired cancer development. Clinically, CamK-A expression coordinates with the activation of CaMK-NF-κB axis, and its high expression indicates poor patient survival rate, suggesting its role as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling-Jie Sang
- College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
| | - Huai-Qiang Ju
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China
| | - Guang-Ping Liu
- College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; College of Life Sciences, Yan'an University, Yan'an, Shaanxi 716000, China
| | - Tian Tian
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China
| | - Guo-Lin Ma
- Center for Translational Cancer Research, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yun-Xin Lu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China
| | - Ze-Xian Liu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China
| | - Ruo-Lang Pan
- College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
| | - Rui-Hua Li
- College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
| | - Hai-Long Piao
- CAS Key Laboratory of Separation Science for Analytical Chemistry, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, Liaoning 116023, China
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Science, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Luo-Jia Yang
- College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
| | - Qingfeng Yan
- College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
| | - Wenqi Wang
- Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
| | - Jianzhong Shao
- College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
| | - Yubin Zhou
- Center for Translational Cancer Research, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Tianhua Zhou
- Department of Cell Biology and Program in Molecular Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
| | - Aifu Lin
- College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; Key Laboratory for Cell and Gene Engineering of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Xing Z, Zhang Y, Liang K, Yan L, Xiang Y, Li C, Hu Q, Jin F, Putluri V, Putluri N, Coarfa C, Sreekumar A, Park PK, Nguyen TK, Wang S, Zhou J, Zhou Y, Marks JR, Hawke DH, Hung MC, Yang L, Han L, Ying H, Lin C. Expression of Long Noncoding RNA YIYA Promotes Glycolysis in Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 2018; 78:4524-4532. [PMID: 29967256 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-0385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2017] [Revised: 08/15/2017] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) is yet to be linked to cancer metabolism. Here, we report that upregulation of the lncRNA LINC00538 (YIYA) promotes glycolysis, cell proliferation, and tumor growth in breast cancer. YIYA is associated with the cytosolic cyclin-dependent kinase CDK6 and regulated CDK6-dependent phosphorylation of the fructose bisphosphatase PFK2 (PFKFB3) in a cell-cycle-independent manner. In breast cancer cells, these events promoted catalysis of glucose 6-phosphate to fructose-2,6-bisphosphate/fructose-1,6-bisphosphate. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of YIYA or CDK6 silencing impaired glycolysis and tumor growth in vivo In clinical specimens of breast cancer, YIYA was expressed in approximately 40% of cases where it correlated with CDK6 expression and unfavorable survival outcomes. Our results define a functional role for lncRNA in metabolic reprogramming in cancer, with potential clinical implications for its therapeutic targeting.Significance: These findings offer a first glimpse into how a long-coding RNA influences cancer metabolism to drive tumor growth. Cancer Res; 78(16); 4524-32. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Xing
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yanyan Zhang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ke Liang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Liang Yan
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yu Xiang
- Division of Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Duke University, School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Chunlai Li
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Qingsong Hu
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Feng Jin
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Vasanta Putluri
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Nagireddy Putluri
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Cristian Coarfa
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Arun Sreekumar
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Peter K Park
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tina K Nguyen
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Shouyu Wang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Toxicology, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jianwei Zhou
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Toxicology, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yan Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Yixing People's Hospital, Yixing, China
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Division of Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Duke University, School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David H Hawke
- Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mien-Chie Hung
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,The Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Liuqing Yang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,The Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Center for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNAs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Leng Han
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas
| | - Haoqiang Ying
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,The Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chunru Lin
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. .,The Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Center for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNAs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Salas LA, Peres LC, Abbott SE, Greene CS, Marks JR, Alberg AJ, Bandera EV, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Schwartz AG, Cote ML, Moorman PG, Funkhouser EM, Peters ES, Bondy ML, Terry PD, Doherty JA, Christensen BC, Schildkraut JM. Abstract 5318: High-grade serous ovarian cancer DNA methylation and survival in African-American women. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-5318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic cancer in the United States, and African-American (AA) women have the poorest outcomes compared to other racial/ethnic groups. Although several biomarkers have been proposed to establish prognosis in European ancestry (EA) patients, including some DNA methylation markers (FGF4, FGF21, MYLK2, MYLK3, MYL7, and ITGAE) (Phelps et al., 2017), it is unknown if these or other markers are applicable to AA patients. Using data from the African-American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES), we evaluated 1) if DNA methylation is associated with residual disease and survival, and 2) if previously reported CpG biomarkers for EA women are related to survival in AA women. 121 AA women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) were randomly selected from 600 women enrolled in AACES. Clinical records and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue were retrieved, and a pathologist reviewed histopathologic slides to confirm diagnosis. 92 HGSOC had complete clinical information. DNA methylation was measured using Illlumina HumanMethylationEPIC. Beta-values were preprocessed (RELIC, Tost+BMIQ and ComBat). Low quality probes were filtered. Tumor purity was estimated using InfiniumPurify; <30% was considered low purity. Four cell estimates (RefFreecellmix) were used as a proxy of cell composition. To evaluate DNA methylation alterations, we used the top 100K most variable CpG sites and a semisupervised recursively partitioned mixture model (ssRPMM) approach to delineate the patients into RPMM classes. We also evaluated the six candidate CpGs from Phelps et al. The dataset was divided into training and validation subsets (50% each); if findings were consistent, a pooled statistic is reported. We used logistic regression to evaluate the association between DNA methylation and residual disease; Cox proportional hazard models were used for survival. Models were adjusted for age at diagnosis, low purity, cell types, neoadjuvant therapy, tissue source (adnexa vs. peritoneum), histology (serous vs. mixed), and residual disease. The RPMM classes were not associated with residual disease. For survival, four RPMM classes were delineated, which we collapsed into two classes. A lower risk of mortality was observed for one of the RPMM classes, HR: 0. 03[95% CI: 0.01-0.12]. This “low risk” RPMM class grouped five CpGs in genes PLEC1, AP5B1, DNAH7 and MAPK15. These genes have been associated with cell motility and ovarian cancer ascites. Among the candidate CpGs, we only observed a trend to better survival per every 10% increase in MYLK3 CpG methylation, HR: 0.51 [95%CI: 0.24-1.10]. These preliminary results suggest that some DNA methylation modifications may identify subgroups of AA women with better survival. Previously reported biomarkers in EA may not be as useful in AA women. Future studies with increased sample size may help to disentangle these associations.
Citation Format: Lucas A. Salas, Lauren C. Peres, Sarah E. Abbott, Casey S. Greene, Jeffrey R. Marks, Anthony J. Alberg, Elisa V. Bandera, Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan, Ann G. Schwartz, Michele L. Cote, Patricia G. Moorman, Ellen M. Funkhouser, Edward S. Peters, Melissa L. Bondy, Paul D. Terry, Jennifer A. Doherty, Brock C. Christensen, Joellen M. Schildkraut. High-grade serous ovarian cancer DNA methylation and survival in African-American women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5318.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas A. Salas
- 1The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH
| | | | | | - Casey S. Greene
- 3Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Elisa V. Bandera
- 6Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (CINJ), New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Edward S. Peters
- 10Louisiana State University School of Public Health, New Orleans, LA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wu J, Jiang Z, Chen C, Hu Q, Fu Z, Chen J, Wang Z, Wang Q, Li A, Marks JR, Guo C, Chen Y, Zhou J, Yang L, Lin C, Wang S. CircIRAK3 sponges miR-3607 to facilitate breast cancer metastasis. Cancer Lett 2018; 430:179-192. [PMID: 29803789 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.05.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Revised: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
As a class of endogenous noncoding RNAs, circular RNAs (circRNAs) have been recently identified to regulate tumourigenesis and progression in multiple malignancies. However, the expression profiles and function of circRNAs in breast cancer metastasis are largely unknown. Here, we determined that the expression of a novel circRNA, which we named circIRAK3, was increased in metastatic breast cancer (BC) cells and predictive of BC recurrence. Gain-of-function and loss-of-function studies in BC cells demonstrated that circIRAK3 promoted cell migration, invasion and metastasis in vitro and in vivo but did not affect cell proliferation, colony formation or cell cycle progression. Using circIRAK3 in vivo precipitation and luciferase reporter assays, we identified miR-3607 as a circIRAK3-associated miRNA. Furthermore, RNA sequencing and bioinformatics analysis showed that forkhead box C1 (FOXC1), the target of miR-3607, was downregulated in circIRAK3-silenced cells and mediated circIRAK3-induced BC cell migration. Intriguingly, FOXC1 could, in turn, bind to the IRAK3 promoter, triggering a positive-feedback loop that perpetuated the circIRAK3/miR-3607/FOXC1 signaling axis. Collectively, our findings indicated that circIRAK3 may exert regulatory roles in BC metastasis and may be a potential target for metastatic BC therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Wu
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Toxicology, Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China
| | - Zerun Jiang
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Toxicology, Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China
| | - Chen Chen
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Toxicology, Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China
| | - Qingsong Hu
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ziyi Fu
- Nanjing Maternity and Child Medical Institute, Affiliated Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210004, People's Republic of China
| | - Junjie Chen
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Toxicology, Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhangding Wang
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Toxicology, Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiang Wang
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Toxicology, Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China
| | - Aiping Li
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Toxicology, Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Changying Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, People's Republic of China
| | - Yun Chen
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianwei Zhou
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Toxicology, Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China
| | - Liuqing Yang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Chunru Lin
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Shouyu Wang
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Toxicology, Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Shi B, Grimm LJ, Mazurowski MA, Baker JA, Marks JR, King LM, Maley CC, Hwang ES, Lo JY. Prediction of Occult Invasive Disease in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Using Deep Learning Features. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15:527-534. [PMID: 29398498 PMCID: PMC5837927 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to determine whether deep features extracted from digital mammograms using a pretrained deep convolutional neural network are prognostic of occult invasive disease for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on core needle biopsy. METHODS In this retrospective study, digital mammographic magnification views were collected for 99 subjects with DCIS at biopsy, 25 of which were subsequently upstaged to invasive cancer. A deep convolutional neural network model that was pretrained on nonmedical images (eg, animals, plants, instruments) was used as the feature extractor. Through a statistical pooling strategy, deep features were extracted at different levels of convolutional layers from the lesion areas, without sacrificing the original resolution or distorting the underlying topology. A multivariate classifier was then trained to predict which tumors contain occult invasive disease. This was compared with the performance of traditional "handcrafted" computer vision (CV) features previously developed specifically to assess mammographic calcifications. The generalization performance was assessed using Monte Carlo cross-validation and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS Deep features were able to distinguish DCIS with occult invasion from pure DCIS, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.73). This performance was comparable with the handcrafted CV features (area under the curve = 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.71) that were designed with prior domain knowledge. CONCLUSIONS Despite being pretrained on only nonmedical images, the deep features extracted from digital mammograms demonstrated comparable performance with handcrafted CV features for the challenging task of predicting DCIS upstaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bibo Shi
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Lars J Grimm
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Maciej A Mazurowski
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jay A Baker
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lorraine M King
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Carlo C Maley
- Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; Centre for Evolution and Cancer, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - E Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Joseph Y Lo
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lo JY, Grimm LJ, Mazurowski MA, Baker JA, Marks JR, King LM, Maley CC, Hwang ESS, Shi B. Abstract GS5-04: Prediction of occult invasive disease in ductal carcinoma in situ using deep learning features. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-gs5-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Deep learning, especially deep convolutional neural network (CNN), has emerged as a promising approach for many image recognition or classification tasks, demonstrating human or even superhuman performance. Used as feature extractor, some pre-trained CNN models can match or surpass the performance of domain-specific, “handcrafted” features. In this study, we aim to determine whether deep features extracted from digital mammograms using a pre-trained deep CNN are prognostic of occult invasive disease for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on core needle biopsy.
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we collected digital mammography magnification views for 99 subjects with DCIS at biopsy, 25 of which were subsequently upstaged to invasive cancer. We utilized a deep CNN model that was pre-trained on non-medical images (e.g., animals, plants, instruments) as the feature extractor. Through a statistical pooling strategy, we extracted deep features at different levels of convolutional layers from the lesion areas, without sacrificing the original resolution or distorting the underlying topology. A multivariate classifier was then trained to predict which tumors contain occult invasive disease. This was compared to the performance of traditional “handcrafted” computer vision (CV) features previously developed specifically to assess mammographic calcifications. The generalization performance was assessed using Monte Carlo cross validation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Results: Deep features were able to distinguish DCIS with occult invasion from pure DCIS, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) equal to 0.70 (95% CI: 0.68-0.73). This performance was comparable to the "handcrafted" CV features (AUC-ROC = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.66-0.71) that were designed with prior domain knowledge.
Conclusion: In spite of being pre-trained on only non-medical images, the deep features extracted from digital mammograms demonstrated comparable performance to "handcrafted" CV features for the challenging task of predicting DCIS upstaging.
Acknowledgments: This work was supported in part by NIH/NCI R01-CQA185138 and DOD Breast Cancer Research Program W81XWH-14-1-0473.
Citation Format: Lo JY, Grimm LJ, Mazurowski MA, Baker JA, Marks JR, King LM, Maley CC, Hwang E-SS, Shi B. Prediction of occult invasive disease in ductal carcinoma in situ using deep learning features [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS5-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JY Lo
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
| | - LJ Grimm
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
| | - MA Mazurowski
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
| | - JA Baker
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
| | - JR Marks
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
| | - LM King
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
| | - CC Maley
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
| | - E-SS Hwang
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
| | - B Shi
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Fortunato A, King L, Mallo D, Hall A, Aktipis A, Marks JR, Hwang S, Maley CC. Abstract P2-05-05: Not presented. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p2-05-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
This abstract was not presented at the symposium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Fortunato
- Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe; Duke University, Durham, NC; Arizona State University, AZ
| | - L King
- Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe; Duke University, Durham, NC; Arizona State University, AZ
| | - D Mallo
- Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe; Duke University, Durham, NC; Arizona State University, AZ
| | - A Hall
- Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe; Duke University, Durham, NC; Arizona State University, AZ
| | - A Aktipis
- Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe; Duke University, Durham, NC; Arizona State University, AZ
| | - JR Marks
- Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe; Duke University, Durham, NC; Arizona State University, AZ
| | - S Hwang
- Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe; Duke University, Durham, NC; Arizona State University, AZ
| | - CC Maley
- Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe; Duke University, Durham, NC; Arizona State University, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Wang S, Liang K, Hu Q, Li P, Song J, Yang Y, Yao J, Mangala LS, Li C, Yang W, Park PK, Hawke DH, Zhou J, Zhou Y, Xia W, Hung MC, Marks JR, Gallick GE, Lopez-Berestein G, Flores ER, Sood AK, Huang S, Yu D, Yang L, Lin C. JAK2-binding long noncoding RNA promotes breast cancer brain metastasis. J Clin Invest 2017; 127:4498-4515. [PMID: 29130936 DOI: 10.1172/jci91553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2017] [Accepted: 10/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Conventional therapies for breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs) have been largely ineffective because of chemoresistance and impermeability of the blood-brain barrier. A comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanism that allows breast cancer cells to infiltrate the brain is necessary to circumvent treatment resistance of BCBMs. Here, we determined that expression of a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) that we have named lncRNA associated with BCBM (Lnc-BM) is prognostic of the progression of brain metastasis in breast cancer patients. In preclinical murine models, elevated Lnc-BM expression drove BCBM, while depletion of Lnc-BM with nanoparticle-encapsulated siRNAs effectively treated BCBM. Lnc-BM increased JAK2 kinase activity to mediate oncostatin M- and IL-6-triggered STAT3 phosphorylation. In breast cancer cells, Lnc-BM promoted STAT3-dependent expression of ICAM1 and CCL2, which mediated vascular co-option and recruitment of macrophages in the brain, respectively. Recruited macrophages in turn produced oncostatin M and IL-6, thereby further activating the Lnc-BM/JAK2/STAT3 pathway and enhancing BCBM. Collectively, our results show that Lnc-BM and JAK2 promote BCBMs by mediating communication between breast cancer cells and the brain microenvironment. Moreover, these results suggest targeting Lnc-BM as a potential strategy for fighting this difficult disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shouyu Wang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Toxicology, School of Public Health.,Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, and.,State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, China International Cooperation Center for Environment and Human Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ke Liang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Qingsong Hu
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jian Song
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yuedong Yang
- Institute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jun Yao
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Chunlai Li
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wenhao Yang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Peter K Park
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David H Hawke
- Department of System Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jianwei Zhou
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Toxicology, School of Public Health
| | - Yan Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Yixing People's Hospital, Yixing, China
| | - Weiya Xia
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mien-Chie Hung
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Center for Molecular Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Gary E Gallick
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Gabriel Lopez-Berestein
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Elsa R Flores
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine and.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Dihua Yu
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Liuqing Yang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Center for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNAs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chunru Lin
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Harowicz M, Saha A, Grimm LJ, Marcom PK, Marks JR, Hwang ES, Mazurowski MA. Can algorithmically assessed MRI features predict which patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ are upstaged to invasive breast cancer? J Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 46:1332-1340. [PMID: 28181348 PMCID: PMC5910028 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2016] [Revised: 01/16/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the ability of algorithmically assessed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features to predict the likelihood of upstaging to invasive cancer in newly diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified 131 patients at our institution from 2000-2014 with a core needle biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of pure DCIS, a 1.5 or 3T preoperative bilateral breast MRI with nonfat-saturated T1 -weighted MRI sequences, no preoperative therapy before breast MRI, and no prior history of breast cancer. A fellowship-trained radiologist identified the lesion on each breast MRI using a bounding box. Twenty-nine imaging features were then computed automatically using computer algorithms based on the radiologist's annotation. RESULTS The rate of upstaging of DCIS to invasive cancer in our study was 26.7% (35/131). Out of all imaging variables tested, the information measure of correlation 1, which quantifies spatial dependency in neighboring voxels of the tumor, showed the highest predictive value of upstaging with an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.719 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.609-0.829). This feature was statistically significant after adjusting for tumor size (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Automatically assessed MRI features may have a role in triaging which patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS are at highest risk for occult invasive disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1332-1340.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Harowicz
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ashirbani Saha
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lars J. Grimm
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - P. Kelly Marcom
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jeffrey R. Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - E. Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Maciej A. Mazurowski
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke University Medical Physics Program, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|