A prospective trial of treatment de-escalation following neoadjuvant paclitaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer

Unveiling Neoadjuvant Therapy: Insights and Outlooks for HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

This perspective underscores the evolution and significance of neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer, tracing its history and efficacy in improving outcomes. It delves into the correlation between achieving complete response and long-term survival, emphasizing the predictive value of treatment response estimation. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer, particularly with taxanes and anti-HER2 therapies, emerges as a cornerstone, offering enhanced breast conservation rates and prognostic insights. The focus on individualized care, tailored to treatment response, underscores the need for adaptive strategies. Additionally, the article discusses the ongoing debate surrounding anthracyclines' role and the benefits of dual HER2 blockade. Ultimately, advocating for a personalized approach, guided by treatment response assessment, ensures optimal outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer management.

Tailoring Neoadjuvant Therapy in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Early Breast Cancer: Recent Advances and Strategies

Neoadjuvant HER2 Therapy: Beyond one-size-fits-all.

Pathological and clinical outcomes following neoadjuvant dual HER2 therapy for early-stage breast cancer: An Australian institutional real-world experience

AIM

There has been significant progress made in developing novel targeted therapies in the neoadjuvant setting for non-metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, which may be used in combination with conventional chemotherapy to optimise pathological responses at surgery. However, these therapies, particularly the chemotherapeutic components, may portend significant and long-lasting toxicity. Hence, de-escalation of treatment intensity has been an area of interest and was evaluated in the phase II NeoSphere study. Herein, we report the real-world pathological and survival outcomes from neoadjuvant taxane and dual HER2 blockade recorded at our centre.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients receiving neoadjuvant pertuzumab, trastuzumab and taxane chemotherapy for non-metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer at a single centre in Sydney, Australia. We collected data pertaining to baseline demographic characteristics, pathological response rates, post-surgical prescribing patterns and also undertook survival analyses for invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) as well as exploratory analyses for correlations between pre-specified clinicopathologic factors and pathological response at surgery.

RESULTS

Our population was largely similar at baseline to the NeoSphere study. 71 patients were included in the final analysis. 61% achieved a pathological complete response (pCR). Three patients received conventional chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting. 92% of included patients were alive and disease-free at 3 years of follow-up. Only 3 events of recurrence or death were recorded at a median follow-up of 32 months. No significant difference in iDFS was noted between patients achieving pCR and those with residual disease at surgery.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that de-escalated adjuvant treatment for HER2-positive early breast cancer achieved favourable pathological and long-term outcomes comparable to large trials, some utilising more intensive chemotherapeutic components.

Preoperative factors that predict pathologic nodal involvement in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer: selecting cT1cN0 patients for treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to identify the preoperative predictors of pathologic nodal metastases (pN+) in cT1cN0 HER2+ breast cancer undergoing upfront surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from women with cT1-T2N0 HER2+ breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAC) or upfront surgery at our institution between 2012 and 2023. Factors associated with management strategy were evaluated, and in those undergoing upfront surgery, univariate analyses were performed to identify the clinicopathologic factors associated with nodal metastases.

RESULTS

Overall, 255 women with cT1-T2N0 HER2+ breast cancer met inclusion criteria, including 170 (68.6%) upfront surgery patients and 85 (31.4%) who underwent NAC. The median age at diagnosis was 59 years (range, 27-90 years). Younger age, larger clinical tumor size, high-grade disease, ER-PR-HER2+ subtype, and year of diagnosis after 2019 were significantly associated with receipt of NAC (p < 0.05). In those undergoing upfront surgery, 25.3% were pN+ , including 32.5% of cT1cN0 tumors. Factors associated with nodal involvement included age under 50, larger clinical tumor size, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), multifocality/multicentricity, and abnormal lymph nodes on axillary ultrasound (p < 0.05). In subset analysis of cT1cN0 HER2+ cases, LVI remained the strongest predictor of pN + disease (73.3% vs. 22.6%, p < 0.001). Patients with cT1cN0 HER2+ breast cancer under 50 years had a 47.1% likelihood of pN+ disease.

CONCLUSION

Patients with cT1cN0 breast cancer have a 32.5% likelihood of nodal metastases, with higher incidence with younger age, LVI, multifocality/multicentricity, and abnormal axillary ultrasound. The presence of these factors may identify the patients who would benefit from treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Systemic Therapy Advances for HER2-Positive and Triple Negative Breast Cancer: What the Surgeon Needs to Know

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) was initially reserved for unresectable patients however it has been increasingly used to facilitate breast conservation, downstage the axilla, and inform adjuvant therapy decisions based on response. For patients with HER2+ and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), clinical trials have resulted in the ability to individualize treatment regimens. For HER2+ breast cancer, de-escalation of neoadjuvant regimens to minimize cytotoxic chemotherapy and de-escalation or escalation of adjuvant regimens based on response have been effective. For TNBC, the approval of the combination of chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting has resulted in a major practice shift and opened the door to many additional treatment questions including de-escalation of the chemotherapy backbone or the adjuvant regimen. For both HER2+ and TNBC, most patients are treated with NST except those with very small tumors. Efforts are also being made to optimally identify patients with T1c tumors who may benefit from more aggressive NST. For patients treated according to or enrolled in NST de-escalation trials, breast conservation (even those who become eligible based on response to NST) and sentinel lymph node biopsy when cN0 at the completion of NST are safe and feasible. Continued involvement of surgeons and multidisciplinary teams in the design and reporting of trials will streamline their adoption into clinical practice. Surgeons need to remain aware of ongoing systemic therapy trials to appropriately select patients for NST and plan for appropriate post-neoadjuvant surgical care.

Comparison of anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free regimens in neoadjuvant HER-2 positive breast cancer treatment

While some clinics have adopted abbreviated neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer, there remains a shortage of comprehensive clinical data to support this practice. This is a retrospective, multicenter study. A total of 142 patients were included in the study who are HER2-positive breast cancer, aged ≤ 65 years, with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50%, received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent surgery at 10 different oncology centers in Türkiye between October 2016 and December 2022. The treatment arms were divided into 4-6 cycles of docetaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab for arm A, 4 cycles of adriamycin/cyclophosphamide followed by 4 cycles of taxane/TP for arm B. There were 50 patients (35.2%) in arm A and 92 patients (64.8%) in arm B. The median follow-up of all of the patients was 19.9 months (95% CI 17.5-22.3). The 3-year DFS rates for treatment arms A and B were 90.0% and 83.8%, respectively, and the survival outcomes between the groups were similar (p = 0.34). Furthermore, the pathologic complete response rates were similar in both treatment arms, at 50.0% and 51.1%, respectively (p = 0.90). This study supports shortened neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer, a common practice in some clinics.

Predictive markers for pathological complete response (pCR) after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Patients with HER2-positive invasive breast cancer that is node-positive and/or larger than 3 cm are generally treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We aimed to identify predictive markers for pathological complete response (pCR) after NAC in HER2-positive breast carcinoma.

METHODS

Hematoxylin/eosin-stained slides of 43 HER2-positive breast carcinoma biopsies were histopathologically reviewed. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on pre-NAC biopsies, comprising HER2, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Ki-67, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), mucin-4 (MUC4), p53 and p63. Dual-probe HER2 in situ hybridization (ISH) was performed to study the mean HER2 and CEP17 copy numbers. ISH and IHC data were retrospectively collected for a validation cohort, comprising 33 patients.

RESULTS

Younger age at diagnosis, 3+ HER2 IHC scores, high mean HER2 copy numbers and high mean HER2/CEP17 ratios were significantly associated with an increased chance of achieving a pCR, and the latter two associations were confirmed in the validation cohort. No other immunohistochemical or histopathological markers were associated with pCR.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study of two community-based NAC-treated HER2-positive breast cancer patient cohorts identified high mean HER2 copy numbers as a strong predictor for pCR. Further studies on larger cohorts are required to determine a precise cut-point for this predictive marker.

Qualification of a multiplexed tissue imaging assay and detection of novel patterns of HER2 heterogeneity in breast cancer

Emerging data suggests that HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) is associated with therapy resistance, highlighting the need for new strategies to assess HER2 ITH. A promising approach is leveraging multiplexed tissue analysis techniques such as cyclic immunofluorescence (CyCIF), which enable visualization and quantification of 10-60 antigens at single-cell resolution from individual tissue sections. In this study, we qualified a breast cancer-specific antibody panel, including HER2, ER, and PR, for multiplexed tissue imaging. We then compared the performance of these antibodies against established clinical standards using pixel-, cell- and tissue-level analyses, utilizing 866 tissue cores (representing 294 patients). To ensure reliability, the CyCIF antibodies were qualified against HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) data from the same samples. Our findings demonstrate the successful qualification of a breast cancer antibody panel for CyCIF, showing high concordance with established clinical antibodies. Subsequently, we employed the qualified antibodies, along with antibodies for CD45, CD68, PD-L1, p53, Ki67, pRB, and AR, to characterize 567 HER2+ invasive breast cancer samples from 189 patients. Through single-cell analysis, we identified four distinct cell clusters within HER2+ breast cancer exhibiting heterogeneous HER2 expression. Furthermore, these clusters displayed variations in ER, PR, p53, AR, and PD-L1 expression. To quantify the extent of heterogeneity, we calculated heterogeneity scores based on the diversity among these clusters. Our analysis revealed expression patterns that are relevant to breast cancer biology, with correlations to HER2 ITH and potential relevance to clinical outcomes.

Bispecific antibodies revolutionizing breast cancer treatment: a comprehensive overview

Breast cancer (BCa) is known as a complex and prevalent disease requiring the development of novel anticancer therapeutic approaches. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have emerged as a favorable strategy for BCa treatment due to their unique ability to target two different antigens simultaneously. By targeting tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) on cancer cells, engaging immune effector cells, or blocking critical signaling pathways, BsAbs offer enhanced tumor specificity and immune system involvement, improving anti-cancer activity. Preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the potential of BsAbs in BCa. For example, BsAbs targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) have shown the ability to redirect immune cells to HER2-positive BCa cells, resulting in effective tumor cell killing. Moreover, targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway by BsAbs has demonstrated promising outcomes in overcoming immunosuppression and enhancing immune-mediated tumor clearance. Combining BsAbs with existing therapeutic approaches, such as chemotherapy, targeted therapies, or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has also revealed synergistic effects in preclinical models and early clinical trials, emphasizing the usefulness and potential of BsAbs in BCa treatment. This review summarizes the latest evidence about BsAbs in treating BCa and the challenges and opportunities of their use in BCa.

Association of HER2DX with pathological complete response and survival outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The HER2DX genomic test predicts pathological complete response (pCR) and survival outcome in early-stage HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. Here, we evaluated the association of HER2DX scores with (i) pCR according to hormone receptor status and various treatment regimens, and (ii) survival outcome according to pCR status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven neoadjuvant cohorts with HER2DX and clinical individual patient data were evaluated (DAPHNe, GOM-HGUGM-2018-05, CALGB-40601, ISPY-2, BiOnHER, NEOHER and PAMELA). All patients were treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab (n = 765) in combination with pertuzumab (n = 328), lapatinib (n = 187) or without a second anti-HER2 drug (n = 250). Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were available in a combined series of 268 patients (i.e. NEOHER and PAMELA) with a pCR (n = 118) and without a pCR (n = 150). Cox models were adjusted to evaluate whether HER2DX can identify patients with low or high risk beyond pCR status.

RESULTS

HER2DX pCR score was significantly associated with pCR in all patients [odds ratio (OR) per 10-unit increase = 1.59, 95% confidence interval 1.43-1.77; area under the ROC curve = 0.75], with or without dual HER2 blockade. A statistically significant increase in pCR rate due to dual HER2 blockade over trastuzumab-only was observed in HER2DX pCR-high tumors treated with chemotherapy (OR = 2.36 (1.09-5.42). A statistically significant increase in pCR rate due to multi-agent chemotherapy over a single taxane was observed in HER2DX pCR-medium tumors treated with dual HER2 blockade (OR = 3.11, 1.54-6.49). The pCR rates in HER2DX pCR-low tumors were ≤30.0% regardless of treatment administered. After adjusting by pCR status, patients identified as HER2DX low-risk had better EFS (P < 0.001) and OS (P = 0.006) compared with patients with HER2DX high-risk.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2DX pCR score and risk score might help identify ideal candidates to receive neoadjuvant dual HER2 blockade in combination with a single taxane in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer.

Appraisal of Systemic Treatment Strategies in Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer-A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

The overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+) accounts for 15-20% of all breast cancer phenotypes. Even after the completion of the standard combination of chemotherapy and trastuzumab, relapse events occur in approximately 15% of cases. The neoadjuvant approach has multiple benefits that include the potential to downgrade staging and convert previously unresectable tumors to operable tumors. In addition, achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) following preoperative systemic treatment is prognostic of enhanced survival outcomes. Thus, optimal evaluation among the suitable strategies is crucial in deciding which patients should be selected for the neoadjuvant approach.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in the Embase, Medline, and Cochrane electronic libraries.

CONCLUSION

The evaluation of tumor and LN staging and, hence, stratifying BC recurrence risk are decisive factors in guiding clinicians to optimize treatment decisions between the neoadjuvant versus adjuvant approaches. For each individual case, it is important to consider the most likely postsurgical outcome, since, if the patient does not obtain pCR following neoadjuvant treatment, they are eligible for adjuvant T-DM1 in the case of residual disease. This review of HER2-positive female BC outlines suitable neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic treatment strategies for guiding clinical decision making around the selection of an appropriate therapy.

Assessment of the HER2DX Assay in Patients With ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Paclitaxel, Trastuzumab, and Pertuzumab

Importance

Patients with early-stage ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive breast cancer (ERBB2+ BC) who experience a pathologic complete response (pCR) after receiving neoadjuvant therapy have favorable survival outcomes. Predicting the likelihood of pCR may help optimize neoadjuvant therapy.

Objective

To test the ability of the HER2DX assay to predict the likelihood of pCR in patients with early-stage ERBB2+ BC who are receiving deescalated neoadjuvant therapy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this diagnostic/prognostic study, the HER2DX assay was administered on pretreatment tumor biopsy samples from patients enrolled in the single-arm, multicenter, prospective phase 2 DAPHNe clinical trial who had newly diagnosed stage II to III ERBB2+ BC that was treated with neoadjuvant paclitaxel weekly for 12 weeks plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.

Interventions and Exposures

The HER2DX assay is a classifier derived from gene expression and limited clinical features that provides 2 independent scores to predict prognosis and likelihood of pCR in patients with early-stage ERBB2+ BC. The assay was administered on baseline tumor samples from 80 of 97 patients (82.5%) in the DAPHNe trial.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary aim was to test the ability of the HER2DX pCR likelihood score (as a continuous variable from 0-100) to predict pCR (ypT0/isN0).

Results

Of 80 participants, 79 (98.8%) were women and there were 4 African American (5.0%), 6 Asian (7.5%), 4 Hispanic (5.0%), and 66 White individuals (82.5%); the mean (range) age was 50.3 (26.0-78.0) years. The HER2DX pCR score was significantly associated with pCR (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.08; P < .001). The pCR rates in the HER2DX high, medium, and low pCR score groups were 92.6%, 63.6%, and 29.0%, respectively (high vs low odds ratio, 30.6; P < .001). The HER2DX pCR score was significantly associated with pCR independently of hormone receptor status, ERBB2 immunohistochemistry score, HER2DX ERBB2 expression score, and prediction analysis of microarray 50 ERBB2-enriched subtype. The correlation between the HER2DX pCR score and prognostic risk score was weak (Pearson coefficient, -0.12). Performance of the risk score could not be assessed due to lack of recurrence events.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this diagnostic/prognostic study suggest that the HER2DX pCR score assay could predict pCR following treatment with deescalated neoadjuvant paclitaxel with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in patients with early-stage ERBB2+ BC. The HER2DX pCR score might guide therapeutic decisions by identifying patients who are candidates for deescalated or escalated approaches.

Assessment of a Genomic Assay in Patients With ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab-Based Chemotherapy With or Without Pertuzumab

Importance

Biomarkers to guide the use of pertuzumab in the treatment of early-stage ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive breast cancer beyond simple ERBB2 status are needed.

Objective

To determine if use of the HER2DX genomic assay (Reveal Genomics) in pretreatment baseline tissue samples of patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer is associated with response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy with or without pertuzumab.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This is a retrospective diagnostic/prognostic analysis of a multicenter academic observational study in Spain performed during 2018 to 2022 (GOM-HGUGM-2018-05). In addition, a combined analysis with 2 previously reported trials of neoadjuvant cohorts with results from the assay (DAPHNe and I-SPY2) was performed. All patients had stage I to III ERBB2-positive breast cancer, signed informed consent, and had available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens obtained prior to starting therapy.

Exposures

Patients received intravenous trastuzumab, 8 mg/kg, loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks in combination with intravenous docetaxel, 75 mg/m2, every 3 weeks and intravenous carboplatin area under the curve of 6 every 3 weeks for 6 cycles, or this regimen plus intravenous pertuzumab, 840 mg, loading dose, followed by an intravenous 420-mg dose every 3 weeks for 6 cycles.

Main Outcome and Measures

Association of baseline assay-reported pathologic complete response (pCR) score with pCR in the breast and axilla, as well as association of baseline assay-reported pCR score with response to pertuzumab.

Results

The assay was evaluated in 155 patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer (mean [range] age, 50.3 [26-78] years). Clinical T1 to T2 and node-positive disease was present in 113 (72.9%) and 99 (63.9%) patients, respectively, and 105 (67.7%) tumors were hormone receptor positive. The overall pCR rate was 57.4% (95% CI, 49.2%-65.2%). The proportion of patients in the assay-reported pCR-low, pCR-medium, and pCR-high groups was 53 (34.2%), 54 (34.8%), and 48 (31.0%), respectively. In the multivariable analysis, the assay-reported pCR score (as a continuous variable from 0-100) showed a statistically significant association with pCR (odds ratio [OR] per 10-unit increase, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.22-1.70; P < .001). The pCR rates in the assay-reported pCR-high and pCR-low groups were 75.0% and 28.3%, respectively (OR, 7.85; 95% CI, 2.67-24.91; P < .001). In the combined analysis (n = 282), an increase in pCR rate due to pertuzumab was found in the assay-reported pCR-high tumors (OR, 5.36; 95% CI, 1.89-15.20; P < .001) but not in the assay-reported pCR-low tumors (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.30-2.46; P = .77). A statistically significant interaction between the assay-reported pCR score and the effect of pertuzumab in pCR was observed.

Conclusions and Relevance

This diagnostic/prognostic study demonstrated that the genomic assay predicted pCR following neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy with or without pertuzumab. This assay could guide therapeutic decisions regarding the use of neoadjuvant pertuzumab.

Individualizing Curative-Intent Therapy in HER2-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancers have been historically considered an aggressive entity with high rates of recurrence and poor survival. However, during the last 20 years, there has been a dramatic change in prognosis due to the incorporation of different anti-HER2 therapies into the neo/adjuvant chemotherapy backbone. Neoadjuvant dual blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab has become the standard of care for women with stage II and III HER2+ breast cancer. Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) has been shown to improve outcomes if pathological complete response (pCR) is not achieved, and adjuvant extended therapy with neratinib has increased disease-free survival (DFS) and may have an impact in central nervous system (CNS) recurrences. However, these agents are both toxic for individual patients and costly for the overall healthcare system, and there are still patients that experience recurrence despite therapy improvements. At the same time, it has been shown that some patients with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer can be effectively treated with less intensive systemic therapy, using only taxane and trastuzumab, or that the chemotherapy backbone can be omitted completely. The current challenge is to properly identify which patients can receive a de-intensified regimen and which need new intensification strategies. Tumor size, nodal status, and pCR achievement after neoadjuvant treatment are well-known risk factors that can aid in making clinical decisions, but they do not accurately predict all patient outcomes. Various biomarkers have been proposed to better characterize the clinical and biological heterogeneity of HER2+ breast cancer. Immune infiltration, intrinsic subtype, intratumoral heterogeneity, and dynamic changes during treatment have been described as important prognostic and/or predictive features. The integration of all these factors will be key in the proper identification of the true risk, and individualized treatment strategy, for each patient.

Optimizing adjuvant and post-neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Treatment advances have improved outcomes in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early-stage breast cancer (eBC) but certain patients remain at high risk of recurrence. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has comparable outcomes to adjuvant therapy with the advantage of surgical down-staging, response assessment, informing prognosis, and tailoring adjuvant treatment. Thus, the standard of care for the majority of HER2-positive eBC has become a combination of chemotherapy and HER2-targeted agents given in the neoadjuvant setting.

AREAS COVERED

Mounting evidence suggests that pathologic complete response after NAT translates to a favorable long-term prognosis. The efficacy and tolerability of post-NAT are key, particularly for patients with residual disease. This is demonstrated, for example, by the use of trastuzumab emtansine in the appropriate clinical setting and various new drugs under investigation. This review summarizes the current clinical management and exciting future directions to optimize outcomes in HER2-positive eBC.

EXPERT OPINION

Targeted therapies such as trastuzumab deruxtecan, tucatinib, and immunotherapy have demonstrated impressive responses in metastatic breast cancer, including CNS disease. Incorporating these agents in the post-neoadjuvant space may improve the prognosis of HER2-positive eBC. Future research should prioritize the identification of biomarkers that personalize treatments to achieve maximum benefit and less toxicity.

The Evolving Role of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer

The role of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for localized breast cancer has evolved tremendously over the past several years. Currently, NAT is the preferred option for high-risk early triple-negative (TN) and HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancers and is indicated for some estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers. In addition to traditional absolute indications for NAT, relative indications such as the assessment of outcomes at the time of surgery and guidance of treatment escalation and de-escalation have greatly evolved in recent years. Pathologic complete response (pCR) and the Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) index are highly prognostic for disease recurrence and survival, mainly in patients with TN or HER2+ disease. Furthermore, post-NAT escalation strategies have been shown to improve long-term outcomes of patients who do not achieve pCR. Additionally, by allowing the direct assessment of drug effect on the tumor, the neoadjuvant setting has become an attractive setting for the exploration of novel agents and the identification of predictive biomarkers. Neoadjuvant trial design has also evolved, using adaptive treatment approaches that enable treatment de-escalation or escalation based on response. However, despite multiple practice-changing neoadjuvant trials and the addition of various new agents to the neoadjuvant setting for early breast cancer, many key questions remain. For example, patient selection for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in TN breast cancer, de-escalation methods in HER2+ breast cancer, and the use of gene expression profiles to guide NAT recommendations in ER+ breast cancer. This article reviews the current approach for NAT in localized breast cancer as well as evolving NAT strategies, the key remaining challenges, and the ongoing work in the field.