Changes in intestinal microbiota in postmenopausal oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients treated with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy

Guideline for designing microbiome studies in neoplastic diseases

Oncobiosis has emerged as a key contributor to the development, and modulator of the treatment efficacy of cancer. Hereby, we review the modalities through which the oncobiome can support the progression of tumors, and the emerging therapeutic opportunities they present. The review highlights the inherent challenges and limitations faced in sampling and accurately characterizing oncobiome. Additionally, the review underscores the critical need for the standardization of microbial analysis techniques and the consistent reporting of microbiome data. We provide a suggested metadata set that should accompany microbiome datasets from oncological settings so that studies remain comparable and decipherable.

Baseline gut microbiota as a predictive marker for the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer: a multicenter prospective cohort study in the Setouchi Breast Project-14

PURPOSE

Various studies have demonstrated the causal relationship between gut microbiota and efficacy of chemotherapy; however, the impact of gut microbiota on breast cancer has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the associations between the gut microbiota before neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its consequent efficacy in breast cancer.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary early breast cancer at eight institutions between October 1, 2019, and March 31, 2022. We performed 16S rRNA analysis of fecal samples and α and β diversity analyses of the gut microbiota. The primary endpoint was the association between the gut microbiota and pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Among the 183 patients, the pCR rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 36.1% in all patients and 12.9% (9/70), 69.5% (41/59), and 29.6% (16/54) in those with the luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and triple-negative types, respectively. The α diversity of the gut microbiota did not significantly differ between patients with pCR and those without pCR. Among the gut microbiota, two species (Victivallales, P = 0.001 and Anaerolineales, P = 0.001) were associated with pCR, and one (Gemellales, P = 0.002) was associated with non-pCR.

CONCLUSION

Three species in the gut microbiota had potential associations with neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy, but the diversity of the gut microbiota was not associated with response to chemotherapy. Further research is needed to validate our findings.

Chemotherapy-induced gut microbiome disruption, inflammation, and cognitive decline in female patients with breast cancer

Chemotherapy is notorious for causing behavioral side effects (e.g., cognitive decline). Notably, the gut microbiome has recently been reported to communicate with the brain to affect behavior, including cognition. Thus, the aim of this clinical longitudinal observational study was to determine whether chemotherapy-induced disruption of the gut microbial community structure relates to cognitive decline and circulating inflammatory signals. Fecal samples, blood, and cognitive measures were collected from 77 patients with breast cancer before, during, and after chemotherapy. Chemotherapy altered the gut microbiome community structure and increased circulating TNF-α. Both the chemotherapy-induced changes in microbial relative abundance and decreased microbial diversity were related to elevated circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6. Participants reported subjective cognitive decline during chemotherapy, which was not related to changes in the gut microbiome or inflammatory markers. In contrast, a decrease in overall objective cognition was related to a decrease in microbial diversity, independent of circulating cytokines. Stratification of subjects, via a reliable change index based on 4 objective cognitive tests, identified objective cognitive decline in 35% of the subjects. Based on a differential microbial abundance analysis, those characterized by cognitive decline had unique taxonomic shifts (Faecalibacterium, Bacteroides, Fusicatenibacter, Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-003, and Subdoligranulum) over chemotherapy treatment compared to those without cognitive decline. Taken together, gut microbiome change was associated with cognitive decline during chemotherapy, independent of chemotherapy-induced inflammation. These results suggest that microbiome-related strategies may be useful for predicting and preventing behavioral side effects of chemotherapy.

Preliminary Analysis of Gut Microbiome and Gastrointestinal Symptom Burden in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy Compared to Healthy Controls

BACKGROUND

Alterations in the naturally occurring bacteria of the gut, known as the gastrointestinal (GI) microbiome, may influence GI symptoms in women with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This work aims to describe GI symptom occurrence, duration, severity, and distress and measures of the GI microbiome among women with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy compared to age- and sex-matched healthy controls.

INTERVENTIONS/METHODS

22 women with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy and 17 healthy control women provided stool specimens and GI symptom data using the modified Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS). The fecal microbiome was profiled by metagenomic sequencing of 16S Ribosomal RNA (rRNA). GI microbiome was compared between groups using alpha-diversity (Observed OTU number and Shannon index), beta-diversity (UniFrac distances), and relative abundance of select genera.

RESULTS

GI symptoms with high symptom reports among breast cancer patients included nausea, diarrhea, flatulence, dry mouth, taste change, and poor appetite. Indices of differential abundance (beta diversity) significantly distinguished between breast cancer patients and healthy controls. Unique bacterial features differentiating the 2 groups were Prevotella_9, Akkermansia, Lachnospira, Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136, Lachnoclostridium, and Oscillibacter.

CONCLUSIONS

Gut bacteria are associated with GI inflammation and mucus degradation, suggesting the potential role of the GI microbiome in GI symptom burden. Understanding the influence of GI bacteria on gut health and symptoms will help harness the enormous potential of the GI microbiome as a future diagnostic and therapeutic agent to reduce the symptom burden associated with chemotherapy.

Microbial Therapy and Breast Cancer Management: Exploring Mechanisms, Clinical Efficacy, and Integration within the One Health Approach

This comprehensive review elucidates the profound relationship between the human microbiome and breast cancer management. Recent findings highlight the significance of microbial alterations in tissue, such as the gut and the breast, and their role in influencing the breast cancer risk, development, progression, and treatment outcomes. We delve into how the gut microbiome can modulate systemic inflammatory responses and estrogen levels, thereby impacting cancer initiation and therapeutic drug efficacy. Furthermore, we explore the unique microbial diversity within breast tissue, indicating potential imbalances brought about by cancer and highlighting specific microbes as promising therapeutic targets. Emphasizing a holistic One Health approach, this review underscores the importance of integrating insights from human, animal, and environmental health to gain a deeper understanding of the complex microbe-cancer interplay. As the field advances, the strategic manipulation of the microbiome and its metabolites presents innovative prospects for the enhancement of cancer diagnostics and therapeutics. However, rigorous clinical trials remain essential to confirm the potential of microbiota-based interventions in breast cancer management.

Current and future research on the association between gut microbiota and breast cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is a prevalent malignancy. There exists a strong association between gut microbiota (GM) and the development of BC. The GM composition in individuals with BC significantly differs from that in their healthy counterparts. Furthermore, the distribution of GM varies significantly among individuals with different types of BC. The GM can impact BC through metabolite secretion, the gut-mammary axis, and other pathways. Modulating the GM can serve as a very promising potential therapeutic strategy in the treatment of BC. This article will summarize existing research, focusing on the relationship between intestinal microbiota and BC. At the same time, the project will also analyze the application value of intestinal microorganisms in BC intervention work, so as to provide a reference for the further development of BC prevention and treatment work.

Gut microbiome causal impacts on the prognosis of breast cancer: a Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence has shown that gut microbiome composition is associated with breast cancer (BC), but the causality remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the link between BC prognosis and the gut microbiome at various oestrogen receptor (ER) statuses.

METHODS

We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to analyse the gut microbiome of BC patients, the dataset for which was collected by the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). The analysis was executed mainly via inverse variance weighting (IVW); the Mendelian randomization (MR) results were verified by heterogeneity tests, sensitivity analysis, and pleiotropy analysis.

RESULTS

Our findings identified nine causal relationships between the gut microbiome and total BC cases, with ten and nine causal relationships between the gut microbiome and ER-negative (ER-) and ER-positive (ER+) BC, respectively. The family Ruminococcaceae and genus Parabacteroides were most apparent among the three categories. Moreover, the genus Desulfovibrio was expressed in ER- BC and total BC, whereas the genera Sellimonas, Adlercreutzia and Rikenellaceae appeared in the relationship between ER + BC and total BC.

CONCLUSION

Our MR inquiry confirmed that the gut microbiota is causally related to BC. This further explains the link between specific bacteria for prognosis of BC at different ER statuses. Considering that potential weak instrument bias impacts the findings and that the results are limited to European females due to data constraints, further validation is crucial.

The Association between the Gut Microbiome and Development and Progression of Cancer Treatment Adverse Effects

Adverse effects are a common consequence of cytotoxic cancer treatments. Over the last two decades there have been significant advances in exploring the relationship between the gut microbiome and these adverse effects. Changes in the gut microbiome were shown in multiple clinical studies to be associated with the development of acute gastrointestinal adverse effects, including diarrhoea and mucositis. However, more recent studies showed that changes in the gut microbiome may also be associated with the long-term development of psychoneurological changes, cancer cachexia, and fatigue. Therefore, the aim of this review was to examine the literature to identify potential contributions and associations of the gut microbiome with the wide range of adverse effects from cytotoxic cancer treatments.

Elucidating the roles of the mammary and gut microbiomes in breast cancer development

The mammary microbiome is a newly characterized bacterial niche that might offer biological insight into the development of breast cancer. Together with in-depth analysis of the gut microbiome in breast cancer, current evidence using next-generation sequencing and metabolic profiling suggests compositional and functional shifts in microbial consortia are associated with breast cancer. In this review, we discuss the fundamental studies that have progressed this important area of research, focusing on the roles of both the mammary tissue microbiome and the gut microbiome. From the literature, we identified the following major conclusions, (I) There are unique breast and gut microbial signatures (both compositional and functional) that are associated with breast cancer, (II) breast and gut microbiome compositional and breast functional dysbiosis represent potential early events of breast tumor development, (III) specific breast and gut microbes confer host immune responses that can combat breast tumor development and progression, and (IV) chemotherapies alter the microbiome and thus maintenance of a eubiotic microbiome may be key in breast cancer treatment. As the field expectantly advances, it is necessary for the role of the microbiome to continue to be elucidated using multi-omic approaches and translational animal models in order to improve predictive, preventive, and therapeutic strategies for breast cancer.

Extensive review on breast cancer its etiology, progression, prognostic markers, and treatment

As the most frequent and vulnerable malignancy among women, breast cancer universally manifests a formidable healthcare challenge. From a biological and molecular perspective, it is a heterogenous disease and is stratified based on the etiological factors driving breast carcinogenesis. Notably, genetic predispositions and epigenetic impacts often constitute the heterogeneity of this disease. Typically, breast cancer is classified intrinsically into histological subtypes in clinical landscapes. These stratifications empower physicians to tailor precise treatments among the spectrum of breast cancer therapeutics. In this pursuit, numerous prognostic algorithms are extensively characterized, drastically changing how breast cancer is portrayed. Therefore, it is a basic requisite to comprehend the multidisciplinary rationales of breast cancer to assist the evolution of novel therapeutic strategies. This review aims at highlighting the molecular and genetic grounds of cancer additionally with therapeutic and phytotherapeutic context. Substantially, it also renders researchers with an insight into the breast cancer cell lines as a model paradigm for breast cancer research interventions.

Counteracting gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel induced dysbiosis in KRAS wild type and KRASG12D mutated pancreatic cancer in vivo model

Pancreatic cancer (PC) has a very low survival rate mainly due to late diagnosis and refractoriness to therapies. The latter also cause adverse effects negatively affecting the patients' quality of life, often requiring dose reduction or discontinuation of scheduled treatments, compromising the chances of cure. We explored the effects of a specific probiotic blend on PC mice xenografted with KRAS wild-type or KRASG12D mutated cell lines alone or together with gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel treatment to then assess tumor volume and clinical pathological variables. Beside a semi-quantitative histopathological evaluation of murine tumor and large intestine samples, histochemical and immunohistochemical analyses were carried out to evaluate collagen deposition, proliferation index Ki67, immunological microenvironment tumor-associated, DNA damage markers and also mucin production. Blood cellular and biochemical parameters and serum metabolomics were further analyzed. 16S sequencing was performed to analyze the composition of fecal microbiota. Gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel treatment impaired gut microbial profile in KRAS wild-type and KRASG12D mice. Counteracting gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel- induced dysbiosis through the administration of probiotics ameliorated chemotherapy side effects and decreased cancer-associated stromatogenesis. Milder intestinal damage and improved blood count were also observed upon probiotics treatment as well as a positive effect on fecal microbiota, yielding an increase in species richness and in short chain fatty acids producing- bacteria. Mice' serum metabolomic profiles revealed significant drops in many amino acids upon probiotics administration in KRAS wild-type mice while in animals transplanted with PANC-1 KRASG12D mutated all treated groups showed a sharp decline in serum levels of bile acids with respect to control mice. These results suggest that counteracting gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel-induced dysbiosis ameliorates chemotherapy side effects by restoring a favorable microbiota composition. Relieving adverse effects of the chemotherapy through microbiota manipulation could be a desirable strategy in order to improve pancreatic cancer patients' quality of life and to increase the chance of cure.

Effect of Chemotherapy on the Gut Microbiome of Breast Cancer Patients During the First Year of Treatment

INTRODUCTION

There is accumulating information of the effects of chemotherapy and weight changes on the gut microbiome of breast cancer patients.

METHODS

In this 1-year follow-up study, we investigated gut microbiome of 33 breast cancer patients who donated fecal samples at baseline and after completion of treatment. We compared alpha diversity and mean taxa abundance at baseline and absolute taxa abundance changes (final-baseline) by treatment (16 neoadjuvant [neoADJ], 13 adjuvant [ADJ], 4 no chemotherapy [noC]) and specific chemotherapy agent using Wilcoxon rank sum and negative binomial mixed model (NBMM) analysis.

RESULTS

All four gut alpha diversity measures changed in association with chemotherapy treatment; they increased in the neoADJ (+16.4% OTU p = 0.03; +51.6% Chao1 p = 0.03; +7.0% Shannon index p = 0.02; +11.0% PD whole tree p = 0.09) but not in the ADJ and noC group (ADJ+noC). The difference in Chao1 index change between groups was statistically significant (pneoADJ vs. ADJ+noC=0.04). Wilcoxon p values of 0.03-0.003 were observed for five taxa. In NBMM analysis, changes in taxa abundance differed (Bonferroni-adjusted p ≤ 0.0007) for two Bacteroidetes taxa (g_Alistipes, f_S24-7) and two Firmicutes taxa (g_Catenibacterium, g_Eubacterium). NBMM analysis results remained unchanged with adjustment for weight changes. Alpha diversity changes were also found by receipt of chemotherapy agents. Consistent increases in alpha diversity were observed among those treated with TCHP (OTU p = 0.009; Chao1 p = 0.02; Shannon p = 0.02; PD whole tree p = 0.05) but not AC, Taxol or Herceptin. Those treated with TCHP or Herceptin showed increases in Verrucomicrobia (g_Akkermansia) but decreases of Bacteroidetes(g_Alistipes); the differences in changes in taxa abundance were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Results from this pilot longitudinal study support an effect of chemotherapy, particularly neoADJ on the gut microbiome of breast cancer patients even after adjustment for weight changes. Further investigations are needed to confirm these findings in larger studies and with longer follow-up and to assess the impact of these microbiome changes on patient outcome.