Undetectable or subtherapeutic serum levels of antipsychotic drugs preceding switch to clozapine

The European psychiatric association (EPA) - early career psychiatrists committee survey on trainees' and early-career psychiatrists' attitudes towards therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) use and utility during antipsychotic treatment

OBJECTIVES

This survey assessed psychiatry residents'/early-career psychiatrists' attitudes towards the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antipsychotics.

METHODS

A previously developed questionnaire on attitudes on TDM utility during antipsychotic treatment was cross-sectionally disseminated by national coordinators between 01/01/2022-31/12/2023. The frequency of using TDM for antipsychotics other than clozapine was the main outcome in a linear regression analysis, including sex, clinical setting, caseload, and factors generated by an exploratory factor analysis. Comparisons between residents and early-career psychiatrists, respondents working in in- and outpatient settings, and low-/middle- and high-income countries were performed.

RESULTS

Altogether, 1,237 respondents completed the survey, with 37.9% having never used TDM for antipsychotics. Seven factors explained 41% of response variance; six of them were associated with frequency of TDM use (p < 0.05). Items with highest loadings for factors included clinical benefits of TDM (factors A and E: 0.7), negative expectations for beliefs of patients towards TDM (factor B: 0.6-0.7), weak TDM scientific evidence (factor C: 0.8), and TDM availability (factor D: -0.8). Respondents from low-/middle-income countries were less likely to frequently/almost always use TDM compared to high-income countries (9.4% vs. 21.5%, p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

TDM use for antipsychotics was poor and associated with limited knowledge and insufficient availability.

Rapid Metabolism Underlying Subtherapeutic Serum Levels of Atypical Antipsychotics Preceding Clozapine Treatment: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data

INTRODUCTION

Adequate antipsychotic treatment intensity is required before diagnosing resistant schizophrenia and initiating clozapine treatment. We aimed to investigate potential rapid drug metabolism underlying low dose-adjusted serum concentration (CD) of non-clozapine atypical antipsychotics preceding clozapine treatment.

METHODS

Patients using non-clozapine, atypical antipsychotics (aripiprazole, risperidone, olanzapine, or quetiapine) within 1 year before starting clozapine were included in this study from a therapeutic drug monitoring service in Oslo, Norway, between 2005 and 2023. Patients were assigned into low CD (LCD) and normal CD (NCD) subgroups. Using a reference sample with 147,964 antipsychotic measurements, LCD was defined as CDs below the 25th percentile, while patients with NCD exhibited CDs between the 25th and 75th percentile of the respective reference measurements. Metabolic ratios, doses, and frequency of subtherapeutic levels of non-clozapine antipsychotics were compared between LCD and NCD groups.

RESULTS

Preceding clozapine treatment, 110 out of 272 included patients (40.4%) were identified with LCD. Compared with the NCD group, LCD patients exhibited higher metabolic ratios of olanzapine (1.5-fold; p < 0.001), quetiapine (3.0-fold; p < 0.001), and risperidone (6.0-fold; p < 0.001). Metabolic ratio differences were independent of smoking and CYP2D6 genotype for olanzapine (p = 0.008) and risperidone (p = 0.016), respectively. Despite higher doses of olanzapine (1.25-fold; p = 0.054) and quetiapine (1.6-fold; p = 0.001) in LCD versus NCD patients, faster metabolism among the former was accompanied by higher frequencies of subtherapeutic levels of olanzapine (3.3-fold; p = 0.044) and quetiapine (1.8-fold; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

LCD and associated rapid metabolism of non-clozapine antipsychotics is frequent before starting clozapine treatment. For olanzapine and quetiapine, this is associated with significantly increased risk of having subtherapeutic concentrations.

Exploring low clozapine C/D ratios, inverted clozapine-norclozapine ratios and undetectable concentrations as measures of non-adherence in clozapine patients: A literature review and a case series of 17 patients from 3 studies

BACKGROUND

Up to 1/2 of outpatients prescribed clozapine may be partially/fully non-adherent, based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Three indices for measuring partial/full non-adherence are proposed a: 1) clozapine concentration/dose (C/D) ratio which drops to half or more of what is expected in the patient; 2) clozapine/norclozapine ratio that becomes inverted; and 3) clozapine concentration that becomes non-detectable.

METHODS

These 3 proposed indices are based on a literature review and 17 cases of possible non-adherence from 3 samples: 1) an inpatient study in a Chinese hospital, 2) an inpatient randomized clinical trial in a United States hospital, and 3) and a Uruguayan outpatient study.

RESULTS

The first index of non-adherence is a clozapine C/D ratio which is less than half the ratio corresponding to the patient's specific ancestry group and sex-smoking subgroup. Knowing the minimum therapeutic dose of the patient based on repeated TDM makes it much easier to establish non-adherence. The second index is inverted clozapine/norclozapine ratios in the absence of alternative explanations. The third index is undetectable concentrations. By using half-lives, the chronology of the 3 indices of non-adherence was modeled in two patients: 1) the clozapine C/D ratio dropped to ≥1/2 of what is expected from the patient (around day 2); 2) the clozapine/norclozapine ratio became inverted (around day 3); and 3) the clozapine concentration became undetectable by the laboratory (around days 9-11).

CONCLUSION

Prospective studies should further explore these proposed clozapine indices in average patients, poor metabolizers (3 presented) and ultrarapid metabolizers (2 presented).

Current Status of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Mental Health Treatment: A Review

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) receives growing interest in different psychiatric clinical settings (emergency, inpatient, and outpatient services). Despite its usefulness, TDM remains underemployed in mental health. This is partly due to the need for evidence about the relationship between drug serum concentration and efficacy and tolerability, both in the general population and even more in subpopulations with atypical pharmacokinetics. This work aims at reviewing the scientific literature published after 2017, when the most recent guidelines about the use of TDM in mental health were written. We found 164 pertinent records that we included in the review. Some promising studies highlighted the possibility of correlating early drug serum concentration and clinical efficacy and safety, especially for antipsychotics, potentially enabling clinicians to make decisions on early laboratory findings and not proceeding by trial and error. About populations with pharmacokinetic peculiarities, the latest studies confirmed very common alterations in drug blood levels in pregnant women, generally with a progressive decrease over pregnancy and a very relevant dose-adjusted concentration increase in the elderly. For adolescents also, several drugs result in having different dose-related concentration values compared to adults. These findings stress the recommendation to use TDM in these populations to ensure a safe and effective treatment. Moreover, the integration of TDM with pharmacogenetic analyses may allow clinicians to adopt precise treatments, addressing therapy on an individual pharmacometabolic basis. Mini-invasive TDM procedures that may be easily performed at home or in a point-of-care are very promising and may represent a turning point toward an extensive real-world TDM application. Although the highlighted recent evidence, research efforts have to be carried on: further studies, especially prospective and fixed-dose, are needed to replicate present findings and provide clearer knowledge on relationships between dose, serum concentration, and efficacy/safety.

Self-Report for Measuring and Predicting Medication Adherence: Experts' Experience in Predicting Adherence in Stable Psychiatric Outpatients and in Pharmacokinetics

THE PROBLEM

Poor adherence to appropriately prescribed medication is a global challenge for psychiatrists.

PRIOR STUDIES

Measuring adherence is complicated. In our recent three-country naturalistic study including more than 1000 patients and their adherence to multiple medication prescriptions at the same time, patients' self-report of adherence to each specific drug was the only practical option for measuring adherence. Systematic literature reviews provide inconsistent results for sociodemographic, clinical and medication variables as predictors of adherence to psychiatric drugs. Our studies over the last 10 years in relatively stable psychiatric outpatients have shown that some self-reported health beliefs had consistent, strong effects and a better predictive role. Three dimensions of these health beliefs are characteristics of the individual: 1) attitudes toward psychiatric medication such as pharmacophobia (fear of taking drugs or medicines), 2) health locus of control (the belief patients have about who or what agent determines the state of their health), 3) psychological reactance (an emotional reaction in direct contradiction to rules or regulations that threaten or suppress certain freedoms in behavior). They can be measured by the Patient Health Beliefs Questionnaire on Psychiatric Treatment. The attitude toward each specific medication can be measured by the necessity-concern framework and summarized as the presence or absence of skepticism about that drug. After 25 years conducting pharmacokinetic studies in psychiatric drugs, particularly antipsychotics, we have limited understanding of how to use blood levels to predict the effects of non-adherence or to establish it.

EXPERT OPINION ON FUTURE STUDIES

Future studies to predict adherence should include the inpatient setting and explore insight. Studying the pharmacokinetics associated with non-adherence in each psychiatric drug is a major challenge. Medication adherence is a complex and dynamic process changing over time in the same patient. Personalizing adherence using psychological or pharmacological variables are in their initial stages.