Cancer disparities in war-torn and post-war regions

6th and 7th International consensus guidelines for the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC guidelines 6 and 7)

This manuscript describes the Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) international consensus guidelines updated at the last two ABC international consensus conferences (ABC 6 in 2021, virtual, and ABC 7 in 2023, in Lisbon, Portugal), organized by the ABC Global Alliance. It provides the main recommendations on how to best manage patients with advanced breast cancer (inoperable locally advanced or metastatic), of all breast cancer subtypes, as well as palliative and supportive care. These guidelines are based on available evidence or on expert opinion when a higher level of evidence is lacking. Each guideline is accompanied by the level of evidence (LoE), grade of recommendation (GoR) and percentage of consensus reached at the consensus conferences. Updated diagnostic and treatment algorithms are also provided. The guidelines represent the best management options for patients living with ABC globally, assuming accessibility to all available therapies. Their adaptation (i.e. resource-stratified guidelines) is often needed in settings where access to care is limited.

Real world challenges and disparities in the systemic treatment of ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a global health problem, and the mortality-to-incidence ratio is expected to increase, especially in low- and middle-income countries. These regions face disparities in access to OC care, including lack of awareness, limited access to genetic and tumor testing, paucity of surgical expertise, time to approval of novel therapeutics, and treatment costs. By addressing these inequities, the core aim of this paper is to promote action through collaboration in order to overcome these barriers and promote health equity in OC management and treatment.

Lung Cancer Diagnoses and Outcomes During the Syrian War, 2011-2018

Importance

Protracted wars, which disproportionately affect low-resource countries, exacerbate the challenges faced by cancer care systems, with lung cancer being the most affected as the most fatal oncological condition.

Objective

To characterize the presentation and survival of patients with lung cancer during the decade-long Syrian war.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study included patients at a large oncology center in Syria during the first 8 years of the Syrian armed conflict (2011-2018). All patients with a new diagnosis of lung cancer were included. Variables investigated included histological subtypes, TNM classification (tumor, lymph nodes, and metastasis), and staging at diagnosis as well as the yearly follow-ups up to 5 years after presentation.

Exposure

The Syrian war divided the country into temporary regions with different political influences and heterogeneously impacted health care accessibility among these regions.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Change in prevalence of advanced lung cancer cases at presentation; change in overall survival odds.

Results

The study included 5160 patients from all Syrian governorates (mean [SD] age, 59.6 [10.8] years; 4399 men [85.3%]). New diagnoses sharply declined during the first 3 years of the war, with partial recovery afterward. Regardless of their tempo-geographical regions, 60% to 80% of the yearly diagnoses presented with metastases. The 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 13.1% (423 of 3238 patients with follow-up results) and 0.1% (2 of 1853 patients), respectively. Patients who presented from regions more involved in the armed conflicts showed poorer survival rates with odds ranging between 0.51 (95% CI, 0.44-0.59) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.49-0.74) across follow-ups for up to 2 years in comparison with patients presenting from safer regions. War-related health care inaccessibility explained a greater percentage of the variability in survival (Nagelkerke R2 = 7.5%; P < .001) than both patients' age and the stage of the disease combined (Nagelkerke R2 = 3.9%; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

The Syrian war has been associated with a marked decline in the management of patients with lung cancer, with limited access to specialized care, delayed diagnoses, and substantial decrease in survival rates correlating with the intensity of armed conflict in the respective regions. The profound repercussions of the prolonged armed conflict on patients with lung cancer in Syria necessitates urgent comprehensive strategies to improve the accessibility and quality of health care services, especially in conflict-ridden zones.

Access to advanced cancer care services in the West Bank-occupied Palestinian territory

Introduction

Universal Health Coverage (UHC) identifies the provision of palliative care for people with advanced disease as an essential health service. Palliative care is also stipulated as a human right under existing covenants. Oncology services provided by the Palestinian Authority under Israeli military occupation are limited to surgery and chemotherapy treatment. Our study aimed to describe the experiences of patients with advanced-stage cancer in the West Bank in accessing oncology services and meeting their health care needs.

Methodology

We conducted a qualitative study among adult patients diagnosed with advanced lung, colon, or breast cancer in three Palestinian governmental hospitals, and with oncologists. Thematic analysis was conducted on the verbatim interview transcripts.

Results

The sample consisted of 22 Palestinian patients (10 men and 12 women) and 3 practicing oncologists. The findings reveal that cancer care is fragmented, with limited access to the services needed. Patients face referral delays in accessing treatment which worsen their health condition in some cases. Some patients reported difficulties in getting Israeli permits to access radiotherapy treatment in East-Jerusalem, and others experienced interruptions of their chemotherapy treatment sessions due to the unavailability of chemotherapy medications caused by Israeli-side delays. Other reported problems were related to the Palestinian health system and service delivery and quality, including fragmentation of services, infrastructure issues, and unavailability of medications. Advanced diagnostic services and palliative care are almost absent at Palestinian governmental hospitals, and patients need to seek these services in the private sector.

Conclusion

The data demonstrate specific access restrictions to cancer care in the West Bank due to Israeli military occupation of Palestinian land. This affects all stages of the care pathway, from restricted diagnosis services, to limited treatment and then poor availability of palliative care. Cancer patients will continue to suffer if the root causes of these structural constraints are not addressed.

Libyan cancer patients at King Hussein Cancer Center for more than a decade, the current situation, and a future vision

Background

Since 2011, the Libyan civil war crisis had affected all dimensions of livelihood including cancer care. This has resulted in a steady incline in the number of Libyan patients with cancer seeking oncologic care and management in Tunisia, Egypt and Jordan, among others. King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC) has been one of the main destinations for Libyan patients with cancer for more than a decade.

Aim

We are reporting on the characteristics of Libyan patients with cancer presenting to KHCC during the past fourteen years.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of all Libyan patients with cancer presenting to KHCC between 2006 and 2019.

Results

A total of 3170 records were included in the final analysis. The overall sample was predominantly adults (71%) with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.2. Overall, the most common referred cancers to KHCC were breast (21%), hematolymphoid (HL) (17%), and gastrointestinal tract (GIT) (16.2%) cancers. Breast cancer was the most common among adult females (41.7%), GIT among adult males (23.6%), and HL among pediatrics (38.5%). Around 37.8% of patients presented with distant metastasis at their first encounter at KHCC, among which 14.7% were candidates for palliative care.

Conclusion

The sustenance of treatment for Libyan patients with cancer requires extensive collaboration between governmental and private sectors. The Libyan oncological landscape could benefit from national screening and awareness programs, twining programs and telemedicine, introduction of multidisciplinary boards, and the formulation of a national cancer registry. Adopting the successful models at KHCC can help to augment the oncology services within the Libyan healthcare sector.