Frontline immunotherapy for NSCLC: alone or not alone?

Natural Cyclophilin A Inhibitors Suppress the Growth of Cancer Stem Cells in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Disrupting Crosstalk between CypA/CD147 and EGFR

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a fatal malignant tumor with a high mortality rate. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) play pivotal roles in tumor initiation and progression, treatment resistance, and NSCLC recurrence. Therefore, the development of novel therapeutic targets and anticancer drugs that effectively block CSC growth may improve treatment outcomes in patients with NSCLC. In this study, we evaluated, for the first time, the effects of natural cyclophilin A (CypA) inhibitors, including 23-demethyl 8,13-deoxynargenicin (C9) and cyclosporin A (CsA), on the growth of NSCLC CSCs. C9 and CsA more sensitively inhibited the proliferation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant NSCLC CSCs than EGFR wild-type NSCLC CSCs. Both compounds suppressed the self-renewal ability of NSCLC CSCs and NSCLC-CSC-derived tumor growth in vivo. Furthermore, C9 and CsA inhibited NSCLC CSC growth by activating the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Notably, C9 and CsA reduced the expression levels of major CSC markers, including integrin α6, CD133, CD44, ALDH1A1, Nanog, Oct4, and Sox2, through dual downregulation of the CypA/CD147 axis and EGFR activity in NSCLC CSCs. Our results also show that the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor afatinib inactivated EGFR and decreased the expression levels of CypA and CD147 in NSCLC CSCs, suggesting close crosstalk between the CypA/CD147 and EGFR pathways in regulating NSCLC CSC growth. In addition, combined treatment with afatinib and C9 or CsA more potently inhibited the growth of EGFR-mutant NSCLC CSCs than single-compound treatments. These findings suggest that the natural CypA inhibitors C9 and CsA are potential anticancer agents that suppress the growth of EGFR-mutant NSCLC CSCs, either as monotherapy or in combination with afatinib, by interfering with the crosstalk between CypA/CD147 and EGFR.

From targeted therapy to a novel way: Immunogenic cell death in lung cancer

Lung cancer (LC) is one of the most incident malignancies and a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Common tumorigenic drivers of LC mainly include genetic alterations of EGFR, ALK, KRAS, BRAF, ROS1, and MET. Small inhibitory molecules and antibodies selectively targeting these alterations or/and their downstream signaling pathways have been approved for treatment of LC. Unfortunately, following initial positive responses to these targeted therapies, a large number of patients show dismal prognosis due to the occurrence of resistance mechanisms, such as novel mutations of these genes and activation of alternative signaling pathways. Over the past decade, it has become clear that there is no possible cure for LC unless potent antitumor immune responses are induced by therapeutic intervention. Immunogenic cell death (ICD) is a newly emerged concept, a form of regulated cell death that is sufficient to activate adaptive immune responses against tumor cells. It transforms dying cancer cells into a therapeutic vaccine and stimulates long-lasting protective antitumor immunity. In this review, we discuss the key targetable genetic aberrations and the underlying mechanism of ICD in LC. Various agents inducing ICD are summarized and the possibility of harnessing ICD in LC immunotherapy is further explored.

First-Line ICI Monotherapies for Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients With PD-L1 of at Least 50%: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Objective: Three immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), pembrolizumab, atezolizumab and cemiplimab, have been successively approved as first-line treatments for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1) expression of at least 50%. This study was designed to compare the cost-effectiveness of these three novel therapies in this patient population.

Material and Methods: Using Markov model and network meta-analysis, we conducted separate cost-effectiveness analyses for cemiplimab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab among advanced NSCLC patients with PD-L1 of at least 50% from the United States health care sector perspective. Health states included progression-free survival, progressive disease, end-stage disease, and death. Clinical efficacy and safety data were derived from phase III clinical trials and health state utilities and costs data were collected from published resources. Two scenario analyses were conducted to assess the impact of varying subsequent anticancer therapies on the cost-effectiveness of these 3 ICIs and cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy versus these 3 first-line ICI monotherapies.

Results: In base case analysis, cemiplimab compared with pembrolizumab was associated with a gain of 0.44 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and an increased cost of $23,084, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $52,998/QALY; cemiplimab compared with atezolizumab was associated with a gain of 0.13 QALYs and a decreased cost of $104,642, resulting in its dominance of atezolizumab. The first scenario analysis yielded similar results as our base case analysis. The second scenario analysis founded the ICERs for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy were $393,359/QALY, $190,994/QALY and $33,230/QALY, respectively, compared with cemiplimab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab.

Conclusion: For advanced NSCLC patients with PD-L1 of at least 50%, cemiplimab was a cost-effective option compared with pembrolizumab and a dominant alternative against atezolizumab. Our scenario analysis results supported the cemiplimab plus chemotherapy as a second-line therapy and suggested an extended QALY but overwhelming cost linking to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy.

Interleukin-36α suppresses growth of non-small cell lung cancer in vitro by reducing angiogenesis

Interleukin (IL)-36α, a newly recognized IL-1 family member, has been previously reported to play a pivotal role in autoimmunity diseases and acute inflammatory reactions. Recently, several studies have indicated that IL-36α has potential anticancer effects against certain types of cancer. However, the expression pattern and functional role of IL-36α in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not been elucidated. Here, we report that the mRNA and protein levels of IL-36α are significantly reduced in NSCLC tissues. Low levels of intratumoral IL-36α are correlated with higher tumor status, advanced TNM stage, increased vascular invasion and shorter overall survival (OS). Intratumoral IL-36α expression is an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio = 3.081; P = 0.012) in patients with NSCLC. Overexpression of IL-36α in lung cancer cells did not disturb cell proliferation, apoptosis or cell-cycle distribution in vitro, but markedly inhibited tumor growth in vivo. Mechanistically, IL-36α reduced the expression and secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor A through inhibiting hypoxia-inducible factor 1α expression. Finally, decreased IL-36α expression was associated with high microvessel density and vascular endothelial growth factor A in patients with NSCLC. Together, our findings suggest that IL-36α expression is a valuable marker indicating poor prognosis in patients with NSCLC.

Cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents and the EGFR-TKI osimertinib induce calreticulin exposure in non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Synergistic anticancer efficacy of combination treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be attributable in part to the phenomenon of immunogenic cell death (ICD), which is characterized by the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) from dying tumor cells. The ability of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents and molecularly targeted drugs such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to induce DAMPs during the treatment of NSCLC has remained unclear, however.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We investigated the ability of seven cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents and the third-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib to induce translocation of the DAMP calreticulin to the cell surface in multiple NSCLC cell lines. The plasma concentration of soluble CRT in advanced NSCLC patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy or osimertinib was measured.

RESULTS

Antimetabolites and microtubule inhibitors induced expression of CRT at the cell surface (ecto-CRT) to a greater extent than did platinum agents in six NSCLC cell lines, exhibiting higher up-regulation of phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor-2α (eIF2α). Ecto-CRT expression was positively correlated with apoptosis induction in NSCLC cells treated with these various chemotherapeutic agents. The drug-induced up-regulation of ecto-CRT in NSCLC cells was attenuated by the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK. Osimertinib similarly increased ecto-CRT expression in association with apoptosis induction in five EGFR-mutated NSCLC cell lines. Furthermore, the plasma concentration of soluble CRT in 16 NSCLC patients treated with single-agent pemetrexed or docetaxel and in nine EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib was increased after treatment onset.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that antimetabolites, microtubule inhibitors, and osimertinib are effective inducers both of CRT exposure in NSCLC cell lines and of soluble CRT release in patients with advanced NSCLC, suggesting that these agents might prove effective for promotion of antitumor immunity in combination immunotherapy.

Cemiplimab monotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 of at least 50%: a multicentre, open-label, global, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

We aimed to examine cemiplimab, a programmed cell death 1 inhibitor, in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) of at least 50%.

METHODS

In EMPOWER-Lung 1, a multicentre, open-label, global, phase 3 study, eligible patients recruited in 138 clinics from 24 countries (aged ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1; never-smokers were ineligible) were randomly assigned (1:1) to cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks or platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Crossover from chemotherapy to cemiplimab was allowed following disease progression. Primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival per masked independent review committee. Primary endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population and in a prespecified PD-L1 of at least 50% population (per US Food and Drug Administration request to the sponsor), which consisted of patients with PD-L1 of at least 50% per 22C3 assay done according to instructions for use. Adverse events were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03088540 and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between June 27, 2017 and Feb 27, 2020, 710 patients were randomly assigned (intention-to-treat population). In the PD-L1 of at least 50% population, which consisted of 563 patients, median overall survival was not reached (95% CI 17·9-not evaluable) with cemiplimab (n=283) versus 14·2 months (11·2-17·5) with chemotherapy (n=280; hazard ratio [HR] 0·57 [0·42-0·77]; p=0·0002). Median progression-free survival was 8·2 months (6·1-8·8) with cemiplimab versus 5·7 months (4·5-6·2) with chemotherapy (HR 0·54 [0·43-0·68]; p<0·0001). Significant improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival were also observed with cemiplimab in the intention-to-treat population despite a high crossover rate (74%). Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 98 (28%) of 355 patients treated with cemiplimab and 135 (39%) of 342 patients treated with chemotherapy.

INTERPRETATION

Cemiplimab monotherapy significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 of at least 50%, providing a potential new treatment option for this patient population.

FUNDING

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi.

Immune landscape and a promising immune prognostic model associated with TP53 in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma

Purpose

TP53 mutation, one of the most frequent mutations in early‐stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), triggers a series of alterations in the immune landscape, progression, and clinical outcome of early‐stage LUAD. Our study was designed to unravel the effects of TP53 mutation on the immunophenotype of early‐stage LUAD and formulate a TP53‐associated immune prognostic model (IPM) that can estimate prognosis in early‐stage LUAD patients.

Materials and methods

Immune‐associated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between TP53 mutated (TP53^MUT) and TP53 wild‐type (TP53^WT) early‐stage LUAD were comprehensively analyzed. Univariate Cox analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis identified the prognostic immune‐associated DEGs. We constructed and validated an IPM based on the TCGA and a meta‐GEO composed of GSE72094, GSE42127, and GSE31210, respectively. The CIBERSORT algorithm was analyzed for assessing the percentage of immune cell types. A nomogram model was established for clinical application.

Results

TP53 mutation occurred in approximately 50.00% of LUAD patients, stimulating a weakened immune response in early‐stage LUAD. Sixty‐seven immune‐associated DEGs were determined between TP53^WT and TP53^MUT cohort. An IPM consisting of two prognostic immune‐associated DEGs (risk score = 0.098 * ENTPD2 expression + 0.168 * MIF expression) was developed through 397 cases in the TCGA and further validated based on 623 patients in a meta‐GEO. The IPM stratified patients into low or high risk of undesirable survival and was identified as an independent prognostic indicator in multivariate analysis (HR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.43–3.06, p < 0.001). Increased expressions of PD‐L1, CTLA‐4, and TIGIT were revealed in the high‐risk group. Prognostic nomogram incorporating the IPM and other clinicopathological parameters (TNM stage and age) achieved optimal predictive accuracy and clinical utility.

Conclusion

The IPM based on TP53 status is a reliable and robust immune signature to identify early‐stage LUAD patients with high risk of unfavorable survival.