The PD-1- and LAG-3-targeting bispecific molecule tebotelimab in solid tumors and hematologic cancers: a phase 1 trial

Tebotelimab, a bispecific PD-1×LAG-3 DART molecule that blocks both PD-1 and LAG-3, was investigated for clinical safety and activity in a phase 1 dose-escalation and cohort-expansion clinical trial in patients with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies and disease progression on previous treatment. Primary endpoints were safety and maximum tolerated dose of tebotelimab when administered as a single agent (n = 269) or in combination with the anti-HER2 antibody margetuximab (n = 84). Secondary endpoints included anti-tumor activity. In patients with advanced cancer treated with tebotelimab monotherapy, 68% (184/269) experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; 22% were grade ≥3). No maximum tolerated dose was defined; the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was 600 mg once every 2 weeks. There were tumor decreases in 34% (59/172) of response-evaluable patients in the dose-escalation cohorts, with objective responses in multiple solid tumor types, including PD-1-refractory disease, and in LAG-3+ non-Hodgkin lymphomas, including CAR-T refractory disease. To enhance potential anti-tumor responses, we tested margetuximab plus tebotelimab. In patients with HER2+ tumors treated with tebotelimab plus margetuximab, 74% (62/84) had TRAEs (17% were grade ≥3). The RP2D was 600 mg once every 3 weeks. The confirmed objective response rate in these patients was 19% (14/72), including responses in patients typically not responsive to anti-HER2/anti-PD-1 combination therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03219268 .

Efficacy and safety of cosibelimab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, in metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1)-blocking antibodies are approved to treat metastatic or locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) cases ineligible for curative surgery or radiation. Notwithstanding, some patients experience inadequate responses or severe immune-related adverse events (AEs), indicating the need for improved therapies. Cosibelimab is a high-affinity programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-blocking antibody that activates innate and adaptive immunity by blocking PD-L1 interaction with PD-1 and B7-1 receptors. It is an unmodified immunoglobulin G1 subtype with a functional Fc domain capable of inducing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Here, we present results of the pivotal study of patients with metastatic CSCC from an open-label, multicenter, multiregional, multicohort, phase 1 trial of cosibelimab.

METHODS

In this trial, participants with metastatic CSCC received cosibelimab 800 mg intravenously every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, V.1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR) and safety.

RESULTS

Objective response was observed in 37 of 78 participants (47.4% (95% CI: 36.0% to 59.1%)), with median follow-up of 15.4 months (range: 0.4 to 40.5) as of data cut-off. Median DOR was not reached (range: 1.4+ to 34.1+ months), with response ongoing in 73.0% of participants. Common treatment-emergent AEs (≥15%) were fatigue (26.9%), rash (16.7%), and anemia (15.4%). Eighteen participants (23.1%) experienced immune-related AEs (grade 3: n=2 (2.6%); no grade 4/5). No treatment-related deaths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Cosibelimab demonstrated clinically meaningful ORR and DOR and was associated with a manageable safety profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03212404.

A Phase 1 Proof of Concept Study Evaluating the Addition of an LSD1 Inhibitor to Nab-Paclitaxel in Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer (EPI-PRIMED)

Objective

Lysine-Specific Demethylase-1 (LSD1) is overexpressed in breast cancer cells and facilitate mesenchymal properties which may contribute to therapeutic resistance and cancer progression. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety of combination, nab-paclitaxel and phenelzine, an irreversible LSD1 inhibitor in patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC).

Methods

Eligible patients with mBC were treated with nab-paclitaxel (100mg/m²) weekly for 3 weeks with one week break in a 28-day cycle. Dose escalation of phenelzine followed the Cumulative Cohort Design and phenelzine treatment commenced from day 2 of first cycle. Eleven patients were screened, and eligible patients were enrolled in cohorts with the dose of phenelzine ranging from 45mg to 90mg.

Results

The Optimum Biological Dose was established at 60mg of phenelzine daily in combination with nab-paclitaxel and considered as the recommended phase 2 dose. Most (95%) of adverse events were grade 1 or 2 with two grade 3 events being diarrhea and neutropenia at 45mg and 60mg phenelzine respectively, with no unexpected toxicity/deaths. Commonly reported toxicities were fatigue (n=4,50%), dizziness (n=6,75%), neutropenia (n=3,37.5%), peripheral neuropathy (n=3,37.5%), diarrhea (n=2,25%), and hallucination (n=2,25%). After a median follow up of 113 weeks, all patients showed disease progression on trial with 4 patients being alive at the time of data cut off, including one patient with triple negative breast cancer. Median progression-free survival was 34 weeks. Significant inhibition of LSD1 and suppression of mesenchymal markers in circulating tumor cells were noted.

Conclusion

Phenelzine in combination with nab-paclitaxel was well tolerated, without any unexpected toxicities in patients with mBC and demonstrated evidence of antitumor activity. For the first time, this proof-of-concept study showed in-vivo inhibition of LSD1 suppressed mesenchymal markers, which are known to facilitate generation of cancer stem cells with metastatic potential. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT03505528, UTN of U1111-1197-5518.

Veliparib in Combination With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Study

PURPOSE

Squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) is genetically complex with evidence of DNA damage. This phase III study investigated the efficacy and safety of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor veliparib in combination with conventional chemotherapy for advanced sqNSCLC (NCT02106546).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients age ≥ 18 years with untreated, advanced sqNSCLC were randomly assigned 1:1 to carboplatin and paclitaxel with veliparib 120 mg twice daily (twice a day) or placebo twice a day for up to six cycles. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) in the veliparib arm versus the control arm in current smokers, based on phase II findings. Archival tumor samples were provided for biomarker analysis using a 52-gene expression histology classifier (LP52).

RESULTS

Overall, 970 patients were randomly assigned to carboplatin and paclitaxel plus either veliparib (n = 486) or placebo (n = 484); 57% were current smokers. There was no significant OS benefit with veliparib in current smokers, with median OS 11.9 versus 11.1 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.905; 95% CI, 0.744 to 1.101; P = .266). In the overall population, OS favored veliparib; median OS was 12.2 versus 11.2 months (HR, 0.853; 95% CI, 0.747 to 0.974), with no difference in progression-free survival (median 5.6 months per arm). In patients with biomarker-evaluable tumor samples (n = 360), OS favored veliparib in the LP52-positive population (median 14.0 v 9.6 months; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.89), but favored placebo in the LP52-negative population (median 11.0 v 14.4 months; HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.86). No new safety signals were observed in the experimental arm.

CONCLUSION

In current smokers with advanced sqNSCLC, there was no therapeutic benefit of adding veliparib to first-line chemotherapy. The LP52 signature may identify a subgroup of patients likely to derive benefit from veliparib with chemotherapy.

Cemiplimab monotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 of at least 50%: a multicentre, open-label, global, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

We aimed to examine cemiplimab, a programmed cell death 1 inhibitor, in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) of at least 50%.

METHODS

In EMPOWER-Lung 1, a multicentre, open-label, global, phase 3 study, eligible patients recruited in 138 clinics from 24 countries (aged ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1; never-smokers were ineligible) were randomly assigned (1:1) to cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks or platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Crossover from chemotherapy to cemiplimab was allowed following disease progression. Primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival per masked independent review committee. Primary endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population and in a prespecified PD-L1 of at least 50% population (per US Food and Drug Administration request to the sponsor), which consisted of patients with PD-L1 of at least 50% per 22C3 assay done according to instructions for use. Adverse events were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03088540 and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between June 27, 2017 and Feb 27, 2020, 710 patients were randomly assigned (intention-to-treat population). In the PD-L1 of at least 50% population, which consisted of 563 patients, median overall survival was not reached (95% CI 17·9-not evaluable) with cemiplimab (n=283) versus 14·2 months (11·2-17·5) with chemotherapy (n=280; hazard ratio [HR] 0·57 [0·42-0·77]; p=0·0002). Median progression-free survival was 8·2 months (6·1-8·8) with cemiplimab versus 5·7 months (4·5-6·2) with chemotherapy (HR 0·54 [0·43-0·68]; p<0·0001). Significant improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival were also observed with cemiplimab in the intention-to-treat population despite a high crossover rate (74%). Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 98 (28%) of 355 patients treated with cemiplimab and 135 (39%) of 342 patients treated with chemotherapy.

INTERPRETATION

Cemiplimab monotherapy significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 of at least 50%, providing a potential new treatment option for this patient population.

FUNDING

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi.

Updated Analysis From KEYNOTE-189: Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Pemetrexed and Platinum for Previously Untreated Metastatic Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

In KEYNOTE-189, first-line pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo plus pemetrexed-platinum in patients with metastatic nonsquamous non‒small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), irrespective of tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. We report an updated analysis from KEYNOTE-189 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02578680 ).

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive pemetrexed and platinum plus pembrolizumab (n = 410) or placebo (n = 206) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then pemetrexed maintenance plus pembrolizumab or placebo for up to a total of 35 cycles. Eligible patients with disease progression in the placebo-combination group could cross over to pembrolizumab monotherapy. Response was assessed per RECIST (version 1.1) by central review. No alpha was assigned to this updated analysis.

RESULTS

As of September 21, 2018 (median follow-up, 23.1 months), the updated median (95% CI) OS was 22.0 (19.5 to 25.2) months in the pembrolizumab-combination group versus 10.7 (8.7 to 13.6) months in the placebo-combination group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.70]). Median (95% CI) PFS was 9.0 (8.1 to 9.9) months and 4.9 (4.7 to 5.5) months, respectively (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.58). Median (95% CI) time from randomization to objective tumor progression on next-line treatment or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (progression-free-survival-2; PFS-2) was 17.0 (15.1 to 19.4) months and 9.0 (7.6 to 10.4) months, respectively (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.59). OS and PFS benefits with pembrolizumab were observed regardless of PD-L1 expression or presence of liver/brain metastases. Incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events was similar in the pembrolizumab-combination (71.9%) and placebo-combination (66.8%) groups.

CONCLUSION

First-line pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum continued to demonstrate substantially improved OS and PFS in metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC, regardless of PD-L1 expression or liver/brain metastases, with manageable safety and tolerability.

Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

First-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that lacks targetable mutations is platinum-based chemotherapy. Among patients with a tumor proportion score for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) of 50% or greater, pembrolizumab has replaced cytotoxic chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of choice. The addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy resulted in significantly higher rates of response and longer progression-free survival than chemotherapy alone in a phase 2 trial.

METHODS

In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) 616 patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR or ALK mutations who had received no previous treatment for metastatic disease to receive pemetrexed and a platinum-based drug plus either 200 mg of pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by pembrolizumab or placebo for up to a total of 35 cycles plus pemetrexed maintenance therapy. Crossover to pembrolizumab monotherapy was permitted among the patients in the placebo-combination group who had verified disease progression. The primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival, as assessed by blinded, independent central radiologic review.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 10.5 months, the estimated rate of overall survival at 12 months was 69.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.1 to 73.8) in the pembrolizumab-combination group versus 49.4% (95% CI, 42.1 to 56.2) in the placebo-combination group (hazard ratio for death, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.64; P<0.001). Improvement in overall survival was seen across all PD-L1 categories that were evaluated. Median progression-free survival was 8.8 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 9.2) in the pembrolizumab-combination group and 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.7 to 5.5) in the placebo-combination group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.64; P<0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 67.2% of the patients in the pembrolizumab-combination group and in 65.8% of those in the placebo-combination group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without EGFR or ALK mutations, the addition of pembrolizumab to standard chemotherapy of pemetrexed and a platinum-based drug resulted in significantly longer overall survival and progression-free survival than chemotherapy alone. (Funded by Merck; KEYNOTE-189 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02578680 .).

Safety and Efficacy of Oxaliplatin Doublet Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer is common in the elderly, but owing to under representation in clinical trials, the benefit of standard therapies is uncertain in this age group. We aimed to clarify the efficacy and complications of adjuvant oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy for patients 70 years and older with stage III colon cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients with stage III colon adenocarcinoma were identified from an Australian cancer registry (2006-2013). Multivariable Cox hazard regression was used to determine prognostic factors for all-cause mortality. Chemotherapy complications were quantified using discontinuation rates, hospital admissions, and mortality for 12 months after starting chemotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 2164 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria, including 1080 (49.9%) patients ≥ 70 years. Patients ≥ 70 years were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (60.7% vs. 89.6%) or oxaliplatin doublet chemotherapy (18.8% vs. 71.2%). Older patients receiving oxaliplatin were more likely to cease treatment early (18.7% vs. 7.6%) and require hospital admission (67.0% vs. 53.5%). The addition of oxaliplatin provided an overall survival benefit for patients < 70 years (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.6; P < .0001) and for patients ≥ 70 years (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.9; P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a modestly increased rate of hospital admission and early chemotherapy cessation, we demonstrate a persistent survival benefit for the addition of oxaliplatin to a fluoropyrimidine as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer in elderly patients.

Are BRAF mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) tumors more responsive to VEGFR-2 blockage? Analysis of patient outcomes by RAS/RAF mutation status in the RAISE study—A global, randomized, double-blind, phase III study

622

Background: The RAISE trial (NCT01183780) demonstrated that ramucirumab (RAM) plus leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo (PBO) plus FOLFIRI as second-line mCRC treatment. RAS/RAF mutations are associated with resistance to anti-EGFR therapies and poor prognosis, particularly BRAF mutations. The extensive RAISE biomarker program assessed the association of multiple candidate markers with efficacy outcomes. Here we present the results for RAS/ RAF mutations. Methods: Plasma and tumor tissue collection were mandatory. KRAS mutation status was determined locally before randomization. Further RAS and RAF mutations were assessed centrally by multiplex qPCR using the Modaplex system (Qiagen) only in samples that were initially reported as KRAS wild type. Thus, patients were classified into one of the 3 categories in the table. OS and PFS by RAS and RAF subgroups were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses. Results: As with previously reported KRAS analyses, the favorable RAM treatment effect was similar between patients with expanded RAS mutations compared with patients with RAS/ RAF wild-type tumors. However, in the 41 patients with BRAF mutated tumors, the RAM benefit was even more notable for both OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54; 95% CI 0.25–1.13) and PFS (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.28–1.08). Conclusions: RAISE demonstrated that the addition of RAM to FOLFIRI improved patient outcomes regardless of RAS mutation status. The noteworthy signal for patients with BRAF mutant tumors is encouraging due to their poor prognosis but requires further validation in other clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT01183780. [Table: see text]

Sidedness is prognostic in locoregional colon cancer: an analysis of 9509 Australian patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

Right sided colon cancer (RsCC) is proposed to be a distinct disease entity to left sided colon cancer (LsCC). We seek to confirm primary tumour location as an independent prognostic factor in locoregional colorectal cancer.

METHODS

All patients with stage I - III primary adenocarcinoma of colon were identified from the New South Wales (NSW) clinical cancer registry (2006-2013). Primary tumour location (RsCC vs LsCC) survival analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and adjusted hazard ratios for 5-year all-cause mortality (OS) and 5-year cancer specific mortality (CSS) were obtained using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

We identified 9509 patients including 5051 patients with RsCC and 4458 with LsCC. Patients with RsCC were more likely to be older, female, have a higher Charlson comorbidity index, and have worse tumour prognostic factors. In univariate analysis of all stages combined, those patients with RsCC had a worse overall survival (OS, HR 1.20 95% CI 1.11-1.29, p < 0.0001), although this was not significant in the multivariate analysis (HR 0.96 95% CI 0.89-1.04, p = 0.35). Stage I patients with RsCC had a trend to improved OS (multivariate HR 0.84 95% CI 0.69-1.01, p = 0.07) and a significantly improved CSS (multivariate HR 0.51 95% CI 0.35-0.75, p = 0.0006). In stage II patients with RsCC there was a significantly improved OS (multivariate HR 0.85 95% CI 0.75-0.98, p = 0.02) and CSS (multivariate HR 0.59 95% CI 0.45-0.78, p = 0.0002) compared to LsCC. In stage III patients, those with RsCC had a worse OS (multivariate HR 1.13 95% CI 1.01-1.26, p = 0.032) and a trend to worse CSS (multivariate HR 1.12 95% CI 0.94-1.33, p = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary tumour location is an important prognostic factor in locoregional colon cancer with an effect that varies by stage. RsCC is associated with lower all-cause mortality in stage II, and higher all-cause mortality in stage III.

Subgroup analysis in RAISE: a randomized, double-blind phase III study of irinotecan, folinic acid, and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) plus ramucirumab or placebo in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma progression

BACKGROUND

The RAISE phase III clinical trial demonstrated that ramucirumab + FOLFIRI improved overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.844, P = 0.0219] and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.793, P < 0.0005) compared with placebo + FOLFIRI for second-line metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) patients previously treated with first-line bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine. Since some patient or disease characteristics could be associated with differential efficacy or safety, prespecified subgroup analyses were undertaken. This report focuses on three of the most relevant ones: KRAS status (wild-type versus mutant), age (<65 versus ≥65 years), and time to progression (TTP) on first-line therapy (<6 versus ≥6 months).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

OS and PFS were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier analysis, with HR determined by the Cox proportional hazards model. Treatment-by-subgroup interaction was tested to determine whether treatment effect was consistent between subgroup pairs.

RESULTS

Patients with both wild-type and mutant KRAS benefited from ramucirumab + FOLFIRI treatment over placebo + FOLFIRI (interaction P = 0.526); although numerically, wild-type KRAS patients benefited more (wild-type KRAS: median OS = 14.4 versus 11.9 months, HR = 0.82, P = 0.049; mutant KRAS: median OS = 12.7 versus 11.3 months, HR = 0.89, P = 0.263). Patients with both longer and shorter first-line TTP benefited from ramucirumab (interaction P = 0.9434), although TTP <6 months was associated with poorer OS (TTP ≥6 months: median OS = 14.3 versus 12.5 months, HR = 0.86, P = 0.061; TTP <6 months: median OS = 10.4 versus 8.0 months, HR = 0.86, P = 0.276). The subgroups of patients ≥65 versus <65 years also derived a similar ramucirumab survival benefit (interaction P = 0.9521) (≥65 years: median OS = 13.8 versus 11.7 months, HR = 0.85, P = 0.156; <65 years: median OS = 13.1 versus 11.9 months, HR = 0.86, P = 0.098). The safety profile of ramucirumab + FOLFIRI was similar across subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses revealed similar efficacy and safety among patient subgroups with differing KRAS mutation status, longer or shorter first-line TTP, and age. Ramucirumab is a beneficial addition to second-line FOLFIRI treatment for a wide range of patients with mCRC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01183780.

The Impact of Mismatch Repair Status in Colorectal Cancer on the Decision to Treat With Adjuvant Chemotherapy: An Australian Population-Based Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Testing for mismatch repair (MMR) status in colorectal cancer (CRC) may provide useful prognostic and predictive information. We evaluated the impact of such testing on real-world practice regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resected CRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 175 patients with stage II and III mismatch repair-deficient (MMRD) CRC were identified from an Australian population-based study of incident CRCs. Their treatment decisions were compared with those for a cohort of 773 stage-matched patients with mismatch repair-proficient (MMRP) CRCs. The effect of MMR status, age, and pathologic characteristics on treatment decisions was determined using multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 32% of patients in stage II and 71% of patients in stage III received adjuvant chemotherapy. Among the stage II patients, those with MMRD cancer were less likely to receive chemotherapy than were MMRP cases (15% vs. 38%; p < .0001). In this group, the treatment decision was influenced by age, tumor location, and T stage. MMR status influenced the treatment decision such that its impact diminished with increasing patient age. Among patients with stage III tumors, no difference was found in the chemotherapy rates between the MMRD and MMRP cases. In this group, age was the only significant predictor of the treatment decision.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that knowledge of the MMR status of sporadic CRC influences treatment decisions for stage II patients, in an era when clear recommendations as to how these findings should influence practice are lacking.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a molecular marker of defective DNA mismatch repair found in 15% of sporadic colorectal cancers. Until recently, expert guidelines on the role of MSI as a valid biomarker in the selection of stage II patients for adjuvant chemotherapy were lacking. Conducted at a time when the clinical utility of routine MSI testing was unclear, this study found that clinicians were influenced by MSI status in selecting stage II patients for chemotherapy. Furthermore, the impact of MSI on treatment decisions was greatest in younger patients and declined progressively until age 80 years, when no effect was found.

Testosterone deficiency and quality of life in Australasian testicular cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study

This is the first prospective study in a contemporary Australian/New Zealand population to determine the prevalence of testosterone deficiency in testicular cancer survivors at 12 months from treatment, and any association with poorer quality of life. Hormone assays from 54 evaluable patients in a prospective cohort study revealed biochemical hypogonadism in 18 patients (33%) and low-normal testosterone in 13 patients (24%). We found no association between testosterone levels and quality of life (all P > 0.05). Hypogonadal patients should be considered for testosterone replacement to prevent long-term morbidity.

RAINBOW: A global, phase 3, double-blind study of ramucirumab (RAM) plus paclitaxel (PTX) versus placebo (PL) plus PTX in the treatment of advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma following disease progression on first-line platinum- and fluoropyrimidine-containing combination therapy—An age-group analysis

11

Background: RAM is a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody VEGF-R2 antagonist. The RAINBOW trial demonstrated that RAM added to PTX significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and objective response rates (ORR) in 2nd-line gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma patients (pts). Outcomes are reported by pts aged <65 and ≥65 yrs. Methods: Pts with advanced gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma after disease progression on platinum- and fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to receive RAM (8 mg/kg) or placebo (PL) on days 1 and 15 plus PTX 80 mg/m2IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Eligible pts had ECOG PS ≤ 1 and adequate organ function. OS was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included PFS, ORR, and safety. Results: Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced. Outcomes are summarized in the Table. The incidence of Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) was higher in the RAM+PTX arms for both age groups and similar across age groups. Grade ≥3 AEs occurring in ≥10% of pts and at higher rate in the RAM+PTX arm, and febrile neutropenia are shown in the Table. Conclusions: RAM+PTX conferred similar improvements over PL+PTX for OS, PFS, and ORR in both age groups. Toxicity profiles were similar in both groups, although a relatively higher incidence of Grade ≥3 neutropenia and leukopenia in pts ≥65 years was noted. [Table: see text]

Randomized Phase III Trial of Amrubicin Versus Topotecan As Second-Line Treatment for Patients With Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose

Amrubicin, a third-generation anthracycline and potent topoisomerase II inhibitor, showed promising activity in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in phase II trials. This phase III trial compared the safety and efficacy of amrubicin versus topotecan as second-line treatment for SCLC.

Patients and Methods

A total of 637 patients with refractory or sensitive SCLC were randomly assigned at a ratio of 2:1 to 21-day cycles of amrubicin 40 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on days 1 to 3 or topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 IV on days 1 to 5. Primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.

Results

Median OS was 7.5 months with amrubicin versus 7.8 months with topotecan (hazard ratio [HR], 0.880; P = .170); in refractory patients, median OS was 6.2 and 5.7 months, respectively (HR, 0.77; P = .047). Median PFS was 4.1 months with amrubicin and 3.5 months with topotecan (HR, 0.802; P = .018). ORR was 31.1% with amrubicin and 16.9% with topotecan (odds ratio, 2.223; P < .001). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the amrubicin and topotecan arms were: neutropenia (41% v 54%; P = .004), thrombocytopenia (21% v 54%; P < .001), anemia (16% v 31%; P < .001), infections (16% v 10%; P = .043), febrile neutropenia (10% v 3%; P = .003), and cardiac disorders (5% v 5%; P = .759); transfusion rates were 32% and 53% (P < .001), respectively. NQO1 polymorphisms did not influence safety outcomes.

Conclusion

Amrubicin did not improve survival when compared with topotecan in the second-line treatment of patients with SCLC. OS did not differ significantly between treatment groups, although an improvement in OS was noted in patients with refractory disease treated with amrubicin.

Randomised, double-blind trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with daily oral cediranib or placebo in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: NCIC Clinical Trials Group study BR29

INTRODUCTION

This randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study evaluated the addition of cediranib, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1-3, to standard carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients received paclitaxel (200mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the concentration time curve 6) intravenously every 3 weeks. Daily oral cediranib/placebo 20mg was commenced day 1 of cycle 1 and continued as monotherapy after completion of 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy. The primary end-point of the study was overall survival (OS). The trial would continue to full accrual if an interim analysis (IA) for progression-free survival (PFS), performed after 170 events of progression or death in the first 260 randomised patients, revealed a hazard ratio (HR) for PFS of ⩽ 0.70.

RESULTS

The trial was halted for futility at the IA (HR for PFS 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-1.20, p = 0.45). A final analysis was performed on all 306 enrolled patients. The addition of cediranib increased response rate ([RR] 52% versus 34%, p = 0.001) but did not significantly improve PFS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.71-1.18, p = 0.49) or OS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69-1.30, p=0.72). Cediranib patients had more grade 3 hypertension, diarrhoea and anorexia.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of cediranib 20mg daily to carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy increased RR and toxicity, but not survival.

A multi-centre randomized, open-label phase II trial of continuous erlotinib plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine as first-line therapy in ECOG PS2 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Erlotinib and gemcitabine are active in NSCLC and have synergy in other cancers. This study investigated the activity and tolerability of this combination as first-line therapy in ECOG PS 2 patients. Chemotherapy-naïve patients with NSCLC, either stage IIIB (with plural effusion) or stage IV, with measurable disease and ECOG PS 2, and adequate organ function were randomized to receive either erlotinib (150 mg/day p.o.) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15, every 4 weeks) in Arm A or gemcitabine monotherapy (Arm B). The primary end-point was progression-free survival. Seventeen patients of a planned 120 patients were randomized (12 males; 16 Caucasians, 4 large cell, 9 adenocarcinoma; 13 former and 1 never smokers); 16 patients received treatment (8 in each arm). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) was 8/8 in Arm A and 6/8 in Arm B; most AEs were grade 1 or 2. The most common treatment-related non-hematological AEs were grade 1 or 2 rash (7/8) and diarrhea (7/8) in Arm A. Two patients in Arm A had partial responses, with durations of 16 and 47 weeks, respectively. Overall disease control rate (N=15) was 86% in Arm A versus 50% for the control arm. Erlotinib plus gemcitabine for the treatment of ECOG 2 NSCLC patients warrants further investigation including intermittent erlotinib regimens.

A randomized double-blind trial of carboplatin plus paclitaxel (CP) with daily oral cediranib (CED), an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, or placebo (PLA) in patients (pts) with previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): NCIC Clinical Trials Group study BR29

7511

Background: In NCIC CTG study BR24, CED 30 mg/d + CP increased objective response rate (RR) and progression-free survival (PFS), but there were concerns regarding toxicity in some pts. BR29 tested a lower dose of CED 20 mg/d limiting accrual to pts without significant weight loss/hypoalbuminemia. Methods: Consenting, eligible adult pts with advanced incurable NSCLC of any histology were randomized to receive CED 20 mg/d or PLA with up to 6 cycles of C (AUC = 6) P (200 mg/m2); non-progressing pts continued CED/PLA after CP until progression, unacceptable toxicity or pt request. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). An interim analysis (IA) for PFS was planned after 170 events in the first 260 pts; the study would continue if the hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was < 0.7. Accrual continued until the required number of events was reached then held pending IA. Results: The trial was halted when the IA (n=260) revealed a HR for PFS of 0.89 (95% CI 0.66-1.20). A final analysis including all 306 randomized pts (median age 62, male 55%, PS 0 26%, PS 1 74%, adenocarcinoma 64%, squamous 13%, other histology 23%. RR was significantly higher with CED (52% vs 34 %, p = 0.001). For CED/PLA, respectively, median OS and PFS were 12.2/12.1 [HR: 0.95 (0.69-1.30, p=0.74)] and 5.5/5.5 months [HR: 0.91 (0.71-1.18, p=0.5)]. Grade >3 hypertension (15% vs 3%, p=0.0002), anorexia (7% vs 1%, p=0.02) and diarrhea (16% vs 1%, p<0.0001) were all significantly increased with CED; there were 2 deaths possibly-related to CED [1 each hemorrhage, leukoencephalopathy (prior radiation)]. Conclusions: Adding a lower dose of CED to CP increased RR and toxicity, but not PFS or OS.

Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial

PURPOSE Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly improved in patients who had undergone resection with curative intent for stage II or III colon cancer who received bolus plus continuous-infusion fluorouracil plus leucovorin (LV5FU2) with the addition of oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4). Final results of the study, including 6-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year updated DFS, are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 2,246 patients were randomly assigned to receive LV5FU2 or FOLFOX4 for 6 months. The primary end point was DFS. Secondary end points were OS and safety. Results Five-year DFS rates were 73.3% and 67.4% in the FOLFOX4 and LV5FU2 groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.93; P = .003). Six-year OS rates were 78.5% and 76.0% in the FOLFOX4 and LV5FU2 groups, respectively (HR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.00; P = .046); corresponding 6-year OS rates for patients with stage III disease were 72.9% and 68.7%, respectively (HR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97; P = .023). No difference in OS was seen in the stage II population. The incidence of second noncolorectal cancers was 5.5% and 6.1% in the FOLFOX4 and LV5FU2 groups, respectively. Among patients receiving oxaliplatin, the frequency of grade 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy was 1.3% 12 months after treatment and 0.7% at 48 months. CONCLUSION Adding oxaliplatin to LV5FU2 significantly improved 5-year DFS and 6-year OS in the adjuvant treatment of stage II or III colon cancer and should be considered after surgery for patients with stage III disease.

Two different first-line 5-fluorouracil regimens with or without oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (LV) are standard first-line treatments for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The aim of this multicentre, open-label, phase IIIb study was to assess the addition of oxaliplatin to two different 5-FU regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomised to arm A [two-weekly oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) + either continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) of 5-FU without LV or two-weekly bolus and CIV 5-FU + LV (LV5FU2)] or arm B (5-FU CIV or LV5FU2 alone). Irinotecan monotherapy was planned on progression.

RESULTS

A total of 725 patients were enrolled. After a fixed follow-up of 2 years for each patient, 2-year survival rates were 27.3% and 24.8% in arms A and B, respectively (hazard ratio 0.93; 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.10). The addition of oxaliplatin significantly improved response rates (54.1 versus 29.8%; P < 0.0001) and median progression-free survival (7.9 versus 5.9 months; P < 0.0001). The most common grade 3-4 toxic effects were neutropenia (arm A, 33%; arm B, 5%), diarrhoea (arm A, 14%; arm B, 8%), and fatigue (arm A, 9%; arm B, 8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite improved rates of tumour control, these results failed to demonstrate a survival benefit from the addition of oxaliplatin to infused 5-FU and lend further support to the use of sequential monotherapy in some patients with mCRC.

Oxaliplatin/5FU/LV in adjuvant colon cancer: Updated efficacy results of the MOSAIC trial, including survival, with a median follow-up of six years

4007

Background: The MOSAIC study was designed to evaluate the effects of the FOLFOX4 regimen (5-FU/LV + oxaliplatin) on 3- year disease free survival (DFS) probability in patients with stage II and III colon cancer. Methods: Patients (n=2246) with completely resected stage II (40%) or III (60%) colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive 5-FU/LV (LV5FU2) or FOLFOX4 every 2 weeks for 12 cycles. Results: Results for the primary endpoint of the study (for the overall population, with a median follow-up [FU] of 3 years), showed a significant benefit in DFS for the FOLFOX4-treated patients (78.2% vs 72.9%; HR: 0.77, p=0.002) (André et al, NEJM, 2004). Patients were followed beyond the 3-year cut-off for DFS and overall survival (OS) updates. Final DFS, at 5 years FU, are consistent with earlier results (HR: 0.80, p = 0.003). In addition, at a median FU of 6 years, the study demonstrates a significant benefit in OS for the stage III patients. Summary of OS results (median FU 6 years) Long-term safety update shows no increase in the rate of secondary cancer (5.0% in both treatment arms). Conclusions: These results confirm the benefit of the FOLFOX4 regimen in adjuvant colon cancer patients.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Concurrent end-phase boost high-dose radiation therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with or without cisplatin chemotherapy

The aim of this study was to audit the results of a high-dose, combined-modality prospective protocol for non-small-cell lung cancer in terms of survival, disease-specific survival and toxicity. One hundred and twenty-one patients with non-small-cell lung cancer were treated with a concurrent, end-phase, boost, high-dose radiotherapy protocol with 65 Gy in 35 fractions for more than 5 weeks. Sixty-six patients received radiotherapy alone (group 1), 29 received concurrent chemoradiation (group 2) and 26 received neoadjuvant and concurrent chemotherapy (group 3). Thirty-four patients had stage I disease, six had stage II and 81 had stage III. Overall median survival was 23 months: 75% at 1 year and 23% at 5 years. Median survivals for patients with stage I and stages II and III disease were 43 and 19 months, respectively. For stages II and III patients by groups 1-3, median survivals were 18, 25 and 18 months, respectively, and 2-year survivals were 36, 52 and 38%, respectively. Toxicity was acceptable. Overall, 9% had symptomatic pneumonitis and 7% had grades 3 and 4 oesophagitis. For those who had the mediastinum included in the volume, grade > or = 3 oesophagitis occurred in 0, 11 and 22% (n = 110, P = 0.001), respectively, for treatment groups 1-3. Overall treatment-related mortality was 3%, consisting of two septic deaths, one pneumonitis and possibly one late cardiac event, all occurring in patients who had chemotherapy (7% of 55 patients). Treatment-related mortality declined over the study period. Accelerated radiotherapy was well tolerated, with only moderate increased acute toxicity when combined with concurrent platinum chemotherapy. Toxicity was enhanced by induction chemotherapy. Overall survival outcomes were excellent for this condition. Continued use of this radiotherapy schedule is recommended as the platform for assessment of other chemotherapy schedules.

REVIEW OF PATIENTS WITH PERITONEAL MALIGNANCY TREATED WITH PERITONECTOMY AND HEATED INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOTHERAPY

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal dissemination of malignancy is usually considered incurable. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia and cytoreductive surgery.

METHODS

The present article is a retrospective review of prospectively recorded data in 60 patients who underwent 71 peritonectomy procedures between January 1996 and May 2004. Hospital records, a database and department notes were studied. Conditions treated were pseudomyxoma peritoneii (PMP) and appendiceal cancer (23), mesothelioma (7), colorectal cancer (CRC, 15), ovarian cancer (6) and other forms of malignancy (9). Following cytoreductive surgery, early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) was given in 47 procedures, five with added i.v. mitomycin C. In 34 procedures, heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was administered. A policy change was made from intravenous to intraperitoneal mitomycin C chemotherapy in December 2001. Peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was calculated for all procedures.

RESULTS

Of the procedures, 23 had PCI < or = 10, 37 had PCI of 11-20, and 11 had PCI > 20. The median operation time was 9 h. Blood units transfused and length of hospital stay have declined. Mortality was 4/60 patients (6.7%), caused by pancytopenia and sepsis. Morbidity occurred in 28/71 procedures. The 3-year survival rate for the HIPEC group was 71% compared with 28% for the no HIPEC group. In the complete excision group, the 3-year survival rate was 52% compared with 13% for the incomplete excision group. The 3-year survival rate for PMP and appendiceal cancer was 74%. The 2-year survival rate for ovarian cancer was 67%, mesothelioma 57%, and CRC 50%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity is significantly associated with duration of surgery and units of blood transfused. Our findings are consistent with the international experience in patients treated with combined peritonectomy and HIPEC.

Radiologically placed temporary hepatic artery catheter for treatment of liver cancer

Summary Hepatic artery infusion (HAI) chemotherapy is associated with higher response rates compared to systemic chemotherapy in those patients with unresectable liver malignancies. Operative hepatic artery catheter (HAC) insertion has significant morbidity and mortality, especially in patients with high-volume disease, some of whom may not respond to HAI chemotherapy. We report our experience in 45 patients with high-volume liver disease who were initially treated with HAI chemotherapy via a radiologically placed temporary HAC to try to select the responders who then went on to have an operative HAC. In these 45 patients who had 62 radiologically placed HAC, we found very few major complications, and certainly no complications such as cholecystitis, vascular or malperfusion problems.

Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer

BACKGROUND

The standard adjuvant treatment of colon cancer is fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FL). Oxaliplatin improves the efficacy of this combination in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. We evaluated the efficacy of treatment with FL plus oxaliplatin in the postoperative adjuvant setting.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 2246 patients who had undergone curative resection for stage II or III colon cancer to receive FL alone or with oxaliplatin for six months. The primary end point was disease-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 1123 patients were randomly assigned to each group. After a median follow-up of 37.9 months, 237 patients in the group given FL plus oxaliplatin had had a cancer-related event, as compared with 293 patients in the FL group (21.1 percent vs. 26.1 percent; hazard ratio for recurrence, 0.77; P=0.002). The rate of disease-free survival at three years was 78.2 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 75.6 to 80.7) in the group given FL plus oxaliplatin and 72.9 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 70.2 to 75.7) in the FL group (P=0.002 by the stratified log-rank test). In the group given FL plus oxaliplatin, the incidence of febrile neutropenia was 1.8 percent, the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects was low, and the incidence of grade 3 sensory neuropathy was 12.4 percent during treatment, decreasing to 1.1 percent at one year of follow-up. Six patients in each group died during treatment (death rate, 0.5 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding oxaliplatin to a regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin improves the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer.

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary metastases in patients with colorectal cancer

Introduction

This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of imaging-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for local control of lung metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods

Twenty patients with lung metastases from CRC were treated with a RITA® Starburst XL electrode and RITA® 1500 generator using temperature control and impedance monitoring. Patients received intravenous sedation and analgesia, or local anaesthetic, and stayed in hospital for at least 24 h after treatment. RFA was assessed with computed tomography (CT) at 1 week and 1 month, and then every 3 months.

Results

Forty-four CRC lung metastases in 19 patients were treated successfully at 25 treatment sessions. Five of 19 patients were retreated for new lesions. There were 13 pneumothoraces following the 25 treatments, and six patients required drainage. The median length of follow-up was 730 (range 148–924) days. Six months after treatment CT demonstrated that three lesions had progressed, 25 metastases were stable or smaller, and 11 were no longer visible. At 12 months five metastases had progressed, 11 were smaller or stable, and nine were not visible.

Conclusion

Percutaneous imaging-guided RFA was associated with modest morbidity. RFA can achieve local control of CRC lung metastases: nine of 25 metastases were not visible on CT at 12 months after treatment.

Hepatic cryotherapy and regional chemotherapy with or without resection for liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma: how many are too many?

BACKGROUND

The number of hepatic metastases for which resection or ablation is appropriate remains controversial.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of prospectively collected data from patients with liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma who underwent hepatic cryotherapy and hepatic arterial chemotherapy (HAC) with or without undergoing resection. Patients routinely had preoperative bone scans, chest computed tomography (CT) scans, and abdominal angio-CT scans. Positron emission tomography scans were unavailable. All patients were followed until June 2002 or until death occurred. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used to evaluate the impact of 17 potentially prognostic factors on survival.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-two patients who underwent hepatic cryotherapy and HAC with or without undergoing liver resection for in situ eradication of metastases formed the basis of this report. One patient (0.6%) died postoperatively from myocardial infarction. The morbidity rate was 27.9%. The median survival was 28 months (range, 0-98 months). The factors age < or = 50 years, well-differentiated or moderately differentiated primary tumor, small cryolesions (<3.5 cm), complete eradication of extrahepatic metastases at cryotherapy, and low preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were associated independently with a favorable outcome. In addition, a univariate analysis showed that the absence of untreated extrahepatic disease at laparotomy, postoperative CEA normalization, and a large decline in CEA levels were significant statistically. The number of lesions was not prognostic. One hundred forty-six patients (84.9%) who underwent a complete operation had 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, and 5-year survival rates of 89%, 65%, 41%, 24%, and 19%, respectively. The median survival of patients with 1 metastasis, 2 metastases, 3 metastases, 4 metastases, 5 metastases, 6 or 7 metastases, and 8-12 metastases were 32 months, 29 months, 30 months, 31 months, 27 months, 37 months, and 21 months, respectively (P=0.7859). Twenty-five patients had 6 or 7 lesions, and their 5-year survival rate was 25%.

CONCLUSIONS

When all colorectal hepatic lesions were eradicated, the numbers of hepatic metastases were not prognostic of survival in patients with liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma.

Peritonectomy and intraperitoneal chemotherapy in appendiceal and colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal spread of gastrointestinal malignancies has been regarded as an incurable disease, and treatment has been aimed at short-term palliation. The use of cytoreductive surgery, including peritonectomy procedures and intraperitoneal chemotherapy, has been proposed with the intention of prolonging survival, and perhaps curing patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal and possibly colon cancers. A series of eight patients who have undergone this procedure at St George Hospital is presented, and the results obtained by other groups are reviewed.

METHOD

Eight patients fitted the criteria for peritoneal carcinomatosis between January 1996 and November 1998. In seven patients this was secondary to appendiceal or colon cancer. and one patient had signet ring cancer of the uterus. The surgical treatment involved removing all macroscopic evidence of disease, and this was followed by early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The eight patients (seven female, one male) ranged in age from 25 to 67 years. There were seven complications, including two patients with pelvic abscesses, and one patient who developed Tenchkoff catheter occlusion. There were three deaths, one due to pelvic sepsis after 30 days, and the other two were due to metastatic disease. Of the remaining five patients, two have developed recurrence and three remain disease-free.

CONCLUSION

The results of peritonectomy and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for appendiceal tumours are encouraging. The role in colorectal cancer is less clear, although there are some reports that suggest a benefit.