Green nephrology

Transplantation: A Priority in the Healthcare Agenda

BACKGROUND

In November 2023, in the context of the Spanish Presidency of the Council of the European Union, the Organization National de Transplante organized a global summit discussing global action in transplantation for the next decade. This article reports the recommendations supporting the need to prioritize transplantation in healthcare systems.

METHODS

The working group investigated how transplantation addresses noncommunicable disease mortality, particularly related to kidney and liver disease. They also investigated how transplantation can contribute to the achievement of several of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, especially Goal 3 (good health and well-being), Goal 8 (sustained, inclusive, and sustainable economic growth and employment for all), and Goal 13 (combat climate change and its impact).

RESULTS

By prioritizing transplantation, the increased availability and accessibility of life-saving organs and tissues to the public will not only lead to saving more lives and improving health outcomes for individual patients but also contribute to the development of a resilient health system in general in that country as a consequence of developing the infrastructure required for transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The ethical principles associated with transplantation promote the principles of solidarity in society by fostering the donation process and equity in access to therapy. This article aims to advocate for the widespread availability of solid organ, tissue, and cell transplantation for all patients.

Use of water in dialysis and its impact on the environment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The climate crisis poses significant challenges across various sectors, including healthcare, where resource consumption often exacerbates environmental issues. This review addresses concerns over current levels of water use for dialysis treatment, a critical procedure for patients with kidney failure. Despite its life-saving importance, the dialysis process consumes large quantities of water, contributing to water scarcity and increased carbon emissions associated with water treatment and distribution.

RECENT FINDINGS

Through a comprehensive analysis of current practices, we identify inefficiencies and propose sustainable alternatives aimed at reducing water usage in dialysis.

SUMMARY

Findings indicate that optimizing treatment protocols and considering innovative technologies can significantly mitigate the environmental impact while maintaining patient care standards. This review underscores the urgent need for the healthcare sector to adopt sustainable practices in response to the climate crisis.

Environmental challenges in hemodialysis: Exploring the road to sustainability

Hemodialysis (HD) is a treatment with a significant environmental impact. One dialysis cycle is equivalent to the daily consumption of 3.5-4 people, and the average annual electricity consumption of a center is equivalent to that of approximately 2.5-3 households (9 kWh/day per household). The carbon footprint (kg CO2 equivalent) measures direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions and is influenced by the production of the various materials used, their transport, patients, and healthcare personnel. In this context, it is necessary to understand the real impact of each center on the environment and act sustainably. The aim of this review is to analyze the environmental footprint generated by dialysis, rethink processes, and propose management strategies to provide tools applicable to any unit to reduce the negative impact of this activity. Each center must measure and monitor indicators, set its own standards, design improvement plans, and carry out annual monitoring in a multidisciplinary manner.

Monitoring and maintaining quality in the paediatric haemodialysis unit

Chronic kidney disease in children is being increasingly recognised and reported worldwide, and the focus of paediatric dialysis planning has changed from acute care alone to encompass chronic care. In many parts of the world, haemodialysis for children is performed in adult units and is based on standards established for adults. This review proposes standards for paediatric haemodialysis, incorporating special requirements for children while simultaneously drawing from the adult experience. We discuss the optimum requirements, including space utilisation, equipment needed, water treatment facilities, disposables, safety standards, staffing needs, monitoring and maintenance, infection prevention, waste disposal and quality indicators. We also review recent advancements in the field that should be incorporated into future dialysis units and the steps required for achieving carbon neutrality and protecting the environment.

Future of Uremic Toxin Management

During the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), the retention of uremic toxins plays a key role in the development of uremic syndrome. Knowledge about the nature and biological impact of uremic toxins has grown exponentially over the past decades. However, the science on reducing the concentration and effects of uremic toxins has not advanced in parallel. Additionally, the focus has remained for too long on dialysis strategies, which only benefit the small fraction of people with CKD who suffer from advanced kidney disease, whereas uremic toxicity effects are only partially prevented. This article reviews recent research on alternative methods to counteract uremic toxicity, emphasizing options that are also beneficial in the earlier stages of CKD, with a focus on both established methods and approaches which are still under investigation or at the experimental stage. We will consequently discuss the preservation of kidney function, the prevention of cardiovascular damage, gastro-intestinal interventions, including diet and biotics, and pharmacologic interventions. In the final part, we also review alternative options for extracorporeal uremic toxin removal. The future will reveal which of these options are valid for further development and evidence-based assessment, hopefully leading to a more sustainable treatment model for CKD than the current one.

Decarbonisation of Kidney Care in the United Arab Emirates: A Roadmap to an Environmentally Sustainable Care

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a major public health burden and a leading cause of mortality worldwide and in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Alongside its clinical and humanistic burden, CKD care is associated with a significant carbon footprint. In this narrative review, we present an overview of the carbon footprint of current CKD treatments and the results of an analysis estimating the carbon footprint of CKD treatments in the UAE. Using the life cycle assessment (LCA) method and local data from the published national reports and inventory sources, we estimated that haemodialysis leads to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of ~12.8 tons of CO2 equivalents (CO2eq) per person in the UAE annually. Thus, the decarbonisation of CKD care is crucial in establishing an environmentally sustainable healthcare system. We propose a framework to decarbonise CKD care in the UAE that tackles the carbon footprint of CKD care in the UAE by focusing on three main pillars: Delaying early CKD and slowing its progression; reducing anthropogenic emissions from CKD and dialysis care by promoting best practices and eco-friendly technologies; and enhancing access to kidney transplantation. Such approaches are relevant not only for the UAE but also for global healthcare systems aiming towards net-zero emissions.

Climate Change and Environmentally Sustainable Kidney Care in Canada: A Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Survey of Kidney Care Providers

Background

Climate change impacts health and threatens the stability of care delivery systems, while healthcare is mobilizing to reduce its significant environmental impact.

Objective

This study aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) about climate change among Canadian kidney care providers.

Design setting participants measurements and methods

An electronic KAP survey, created by the Canadian Society of Nephrology-Sustainable Nephrology Action Planning committee, was distributed to kidney care providers across Canada, from March to April 2023.

Results

A total of 516 people responded to the survey. Most respondents (79%) identified as women; 83% were aged 30 to 59 years. Nurses and nephrologists made up 44% and 23% of respondents, respectively. About half of the participants felt informed about climate change to an average degree. Most respondents (71%; 349/495 and 62%; 300/489) were either extremely or very concerned about climate change and waste generated in their kidney care program, respectively. The vast majority of respondents (89%; 441/495) reported taking steps to lower their personal carbon footprint. People who felt more informed about climate change presented higher degrees of concern. Similarly, both those who felt more informed and those who reported higher degrees of concern about climate change were more likely to take steps to reduce their carbon footprint. Over 80% of respondents (314/386) were at least moderately interested in learning sessions about environmentally sustainable initiatives in care.

Limitations

This survey is at risk of social acceptability, representative, and subjective bias. Overrepresentation from Quebec and British Columbia, as well as the majority of respondents identifying as women and working in academic centers, may affect generalizability of the findings.

Conclusions

Most kidney care providers who responded to this survey are informed and concerned about climate change, and their knowledge is directly associated with attitude and practices. This indicates that educational initiatives to increase awareness and knowledge on climate change will likely lead to practice changes.

e-Prescribing, Charting, and Documentation for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Green Intensive Care Unit and Nephrology Initiative

BACKGROUND

Patient care informatics are becoming more advanced with digital capacity and server functionality. The intensive care unit (ICU) is becoming paperless for prescribing, charting, and monitoring care. A further challenge is to include all life sustaining therapies in this digital space. Digital modules and options may be available; however, continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRTs) often require custom design for many nuances. Associated with the COVID pandemic and a surge in the paperless and "green" ICU bedside, we gathered a team to design, develop, and implement a CRRT orders, charting-documentation, and monitoring functionality into our existing Cerner (ORACLE Corp., Austin, Texas, USA) software.

KEY MESSAGES

This included new approaches to the two-dimensional paper documents used prior and a live dashboard with new metrics and data. The design linked to other relevant CRRT pages such as the master patient fluid balance, pathology results, and medication prescribing. The primary views and function are role-related for medical, nursing, and pharmacy with specific and sensitive input. Following the build and implementation, initial evaluation was positive and led to an audit trail or e-history for prescribers use and provision for concurrent therapies. Clinicians use this digital ordering differently with live data available for "handover" and case discussion. There is scope for research and further links to devices such as personal phones and via an app.

SUMMARY

This experience may assist CRRT users design and develop similar prescribing, charting, and monitoring bedside computer opportunities in the desire for digital and green nephrology in the ICU.

Reducing the carbon footprint for a 30-bed haemodialysis unit by changing the delivery of acid concentrate supplied by individual 5 L containers to a central delivery system

BACKGROUND

Haemodialysis treatments generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mainly as a result of the equipment, consumables and pharmaceuticals required. An internal audit demonstrated a 33% wastage of acid concentrate when using individual 5.0 L containers at a 1:44 dilution ratio. We therefore investigated whether changing the delivery system for acid concentrate would reduce wastage and any associated greenhouse gas emissions.

METHODS

We calculated the difference for a 30-bed dialysis unit between receiving acid concentrate in single-use 5.0 L plastic containers versus bulk delivery for a central acid delivery system connected to the dialysis machines. Estimates of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions were made using the United Kingdom government database and other sources.

RESULTS

A 30-station dialysis unit functioning at maximum capacity (3 shifts and 6 days/week), switching to bulk delivery and central acid delivery could realise an approximate total reduction of 33,841 kgCO2e/year; in reduced product wastage, saving 6192 kgCO2e, 5205 kgCO2e from fewer deliveries, and 22,444 kgCO2e saving from a reduction in packaging and waste generated, which equates approximately to a one tonne reduction in CO2e emissions per dialysis station/year.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from delivering acid concentrate in individual 5.0 L containers to a central acid delivery system can result in substantial reductions in CO2e emissions within a dialysis clinic. The emission savings from reducing the single-use plastic packaging greatly outweigh any gains from eliminating wastage of acid concentrate. Dialysis companies and clinicians should consider reviewing the design of current and future dialysis facilities and policies to determine whether reductions in CO2e emissions can be made.

Climate change and its implications for kidney health

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Extremes of weather as a result of climate change are affecting social, economic and health systems. Kidney health is being threatened by global warming while treatment of kidney disease is contributing to increasing resource utilization and leaving a substantial carbon footprint. Improved physician awareness and patient education are needed to mitigate the risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

Rising temperatures are changing kidney disease patterns, with increasing prevalence of acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease and kidney stones. These issues disproportionately affect people suffering from social inequality and limited access to resources.

SUMMARY

In this article, we review the effects of climate change on kidney stones, and acute and chronic kidney injury. Finally, we discuss the impact of renal replacement therapies on the environment and proposed ways to mitigate it.

Hemodialysis water reuse within a circular economy approach. What can we add to current knowledge? A point of view

The ongoing climate change and the ecological challenges call for sustainable medicine and, in our field, sustainable kidney care. Dialysis is life-saving and resource-consuming, and high water consumption is one of the main concerns. Circular water economy, meaning reuse and recycling of water, and recovering resources can help reducing emissions and enhancing resilience to climate change. Several actions are possible including reusing reverse osmosis reject water, employable for gardening, aquaponics or even simply for toilet flushing, or in sterilization settings, reusing spent dialysate, at least for toilet flushing, but with wider use if microbiologically purified, recovering thermal energy from spent dialysate, that can probably be done with simple devices, or using phosphate-rich spent dialysate for producing fertilizers, namely struvite. All these options may be economically sound, and all help reducing the final dialysis carbon footprint. There is room for open-minded innovative approaches to improve water-related sustainability in hemodialysis, ultimately reducing ecological impact and increasing availability.

Climate Change, Kidney Health, and Environmentally Sustainable Kidney Care: A Multinational Survey of Health Care Professionals

Key Points

Background

Given the threat of climate change to kidney health and the significant environmental effect of kidney care, calls are increasing for health care professionals and organizations to champion climate advocacy and environmentally sustainable kidney care. Yet, little is known about their engagement, and existing literature is primarily emerging from high-income countries.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey to understand the knowledge, attitude, and practice of health care professionals on the interconnectedness of climate change and kidney health; to identify personal and organizational initiatives in sustainable kidney care and strategies to increase their engagement; and to compare responses by their country's income level as classified by the World Bank.

Results

Participants (n=972) represented 108 countries, with 64% from lower- or middle-income countries. Ninety-eight percent believed that climate change is happening, yet <50% possessed knowledge about the effect of climate change on kidney health or the environmental effect of kidney care. Only 14% were involved in climate change and kidney health initiatives (membership, knowledge/awareness, research, and advocacy), 22% in sustainable kidney care initiatives (education/advocacy, preventative nephrology, sustainable dialysis, promoting transplant/home therapies, and research), and 26% reported organizational initiatives in sustainable kidney care (sustainable general or dialysis practices, preventative/lean nephrology, and focused committees). Participants from lower-income countries generally reported higher knowledge and variable level of concern. Engagement in sustainable kidney care did not vary by income level. Guidance/toolkit (79%), continuing education (75%), and opportunities (74%) were the top choices to increase engagement. National initiatives (47%), preventative measures (35%), and research endeavors (31%) were the top avenues for organizational engagement. These varied by income level, suggesting that the vision and priorities vary by baseline resource setting.

Conclusions

We have identified knowledge and practice gaps among health care professionals on the bidirectional relationship between kidney disease and climate change in a multinational context and several avenues to increase their engagement.

Environmentally sustainable kidney care through transplantation: Current status and future challenges

The environmental impact of healthcare is an issue currently examined with increased scrutiny and on a global scale with multiple stakeholders seeking to identify the appropriate interventions to reduce it. Interestingly, a significant portion of healthcare's environmental impact stems from intensive modalities of treatment for chronic disease. There is no better example than End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), where dialysis or transplantation are the modalities of treatment offered to the vast majority of these patients. Kidney transplantation (KTx) offers a longer life expectancy and improved quality of life in comparison to dialysis. Cost-effectiveness analyses have proven its financial superiority, as well. PubMed and EMBASE literature search using keywords "kidney transplantation", "carbon footprint", "sustainability" showed that there is no published work in the field of environmental sustainability in kidney transplantation. Relevant literature was identified for surgical services and applied to transplantation. Assuming its environmental superiority to dialysis, maximising KTx rate would be an important action towards "green" renal care services. That could be achieved through living organ donation, systematic use of machine perfusion for extended criteria deceased donors and individualised immune risk stratification techniques. All these measures aim towards implementing enhanced recovery protocols and two vital steps can be taken towards assessing their value. The first step is a detailed audit of the environmental impact of these novel techniques and secondly their impact in reducing the length of hospital stay and its subsequent environmental impact. Another key element is delivering appropriate post-operative care, substituting allograft biopsy with non-invasive techniques and reducing physical outpatient follow-up, using telemedicine. The gap in quantifying KTx services environmental impact needs to be addressed urgently, with development of strategies within the multidisciplinary transplant team. Introducing novel technologies can lead to donor pool expansion and improved organ utilisation rates, transforming transplant services in "green" hubs.

Immobilized Urease Vector System Based on the Dynamic Defect Regeneration Strategy for Efficient Urea Removal

The clearance of urea poses a formidable challenge, and its excessive accumulation can cause various renal diseases. Urease demonstrates remarkable efficacy in eliminating urea, but cannot be reused. This study aimed to develop a composite vector system comprising microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) immobilized with urease and metal-organic framework (MOF) UiO-66-NH2, denoted as MCC@UiO/U, through the dynamic defect generation strategy. By utilizing competitive coordination, effective immobilization of urease into MCC@UiO was achieved for efficient urea removal. Within 2 h, the urea removal efficiency could reach up to 1500 mg/g, surpassing an 80% clearance rate. Furthermore, an 80% clearance rate can also be attained in peritoneal dialyzate from patients. MCC@UiO/U also exhibits an exceptional bioactivity even after undergoing 5 cycles of perfusion, demonstrating remarkable stability and biocompatibility. This innovative approach and methodology provide a novel avenue and a wide range of immobilized enzyme vectors for clinical urea removal and treatment of kidney diseases, presenting immense potential for future clinical applications.

[Which dialysis method for whom? In-center dialysis vs home dialysis]

There are various dialysis methods available to treat patients with chronic kidney failure. Generally, a distinction is made between peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis, as well as between home dialysis methods and center-based dialysis methods. To be able to advise patients optimally, it is important to understand the opportunities and limitations of the different method variants. This article provides an overview of the therapy options and describes their strengths and weaknesses.

Green Hospital as a new Standard in Japan: How far can Neurosurgery go in Japan?

BACKGROUND

Climate change is a significant challenge that the medical community must address. Hospitals are large facilities with high water and energy consumption, as well as high levels of waste generation, which makes it important to pursue green hospital initiatives. Neurosurgery requires substantial energy for surgeries and tests.

METHODS

Based on the keywords "Climate change," "green hospital," "neurosurgery," "energy consumption," "environmental impact" listed in this paper, we extracted representative manuscripts, and the practices employed in the authors' hospital were assessed.

RESULTS

The "Guidelines for Environmental Consideration in Hospitals" and "Guidelines for the Sustainability of Hospital Environments" have been developed; however, they are not implemented in most hospitals in Japan. Inhalational anesthetics were found to contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. Educating patients and staff and employing the "8 Rs" (rethink, refuse, reduce, reuse, recycle, research, renovation, and revolution) showed promise in achieving green hospital standards.

CONCLUSIONS

The advent of 'green hospitals' in Japan is imminent. The active participation of neurosurgeons can play a crucial role in diminishing the environmental footprint of health care while simultaneously enhancing medical standards. Given the pressing challenges posed by climate change, there is a critical need for an overhaul of medical practices. It is imperative for neurosurgeons to pioneer the adoption of new, sustainable medical methodologies.

Ten tips from the Swiss Working Group on Sustainable Nephrology on how to go green in your dialysis unit

The health-care system and particularly renal replacement therapy has a significant carbon footprint adding to global warming and extreme weather conditions. Improving sustainability has become the focus of national and international working groups. Many reviews underline the need for improvement of sustainability in nephrology, in particular dialysis, and provide recommendations on how to reduce waste, energy, and water consumption. However, how to implement these recommendations, and where to start, is not always clear. This paper summarizes discussions within the 'working group on sustainable nephrology' of the Swiss Society of Nephrology. We do not provide a detailed review of the topic but instead present a practical 10-point action plan to help health-care workers in nephrology make a start and improve the carbon footprint of their dialysis centres. We emphasize the importance of ongoing research, cooperation, and dialogue, and welcome additional ideas from the wider renal community.

Does online high-volume hemodiafiltration offer greater efficiency and sustainability compared with high-flux hemodialysis? A detailed simulation analysis anchored in real-world data

Recent findings, including the CONVINCE (comparison of high-dose HDF with high-flux HD) study report, suggest the superiority of high-volume hemodiafiltration (HDF) over high-flux hemodialysis (HD) in improving patients' outcomes. Despite positive patient outcomes, concerns have arisen about the potential negative environmental impact of high-volume HDF, as it may lead to increased water and dialysis fluid consumption and higher waste production. In this manuscript, we address the environmental impact of high-volume HDF, focusing on three key factors: water treatment consumption, dialysis fluid consumption, and solute efficiency markers of HD and HDF. By optimizing HDF prescription through adjustments in operational capabilities, while keeping a high blood flow (i.e., >350 ml/min) such as reducing the QD/QB ratio to 1.2 rather than 1.4 or 1.5 and incorporating automated ultrafiltration and substitution control, we demonstrate that HDF delivers a higher dialysis dose for small- and middle-molecule uremic compounds with the same dialysis fluid consumption, and at equal dialysis doses dialysis fluid consumption is reduced. This finding is supported by real-world data from 26 031 patients who underwent high-volume postdilution HDF at a reduced dialysis flow (430 mL/min) and achieved an effective OCMKt/V of 1.70 (where "OCM" stands for online clearance measurement, "K" represents effective dialysis clearance and "V" denotes total body water measured by multifrequency bioimpedance). In addition, simulation modeling calculations, using blood extraction coefficient, dialysate saturation coefficient and solute clearances with urea (small molecular weight) and β2-microglobulin (middle molecular weight), consistently show the superiority of postdilution HDF to HD. This holds true even with a significant reduction in dialysis flow down to 430 mL/min, reflecting QD/QB ratio of 1.2. Postdilution HDF generates high ultrafiltrate flow (up to 35% of blood flow), delivering saturated ultrafiltrate to the lower solute concentration containing effluent dialysate, thus enhancing solute clearance which opens the way to reduce the dialysis flow. In conclusion, our analysis, combining simulation and real-world data, suggests that postdilution HDF could be a more environmentally friendly treatment option compared with conventional HD. Additionally, automated user-friendly functions that minimize dialysis fluid use can further strengthen this environmental benefit while enhancing efficiency.

A survey of environmental sustainability in Japanese dialysis facilities

BACKGROUND

Dialysis practice has a particularly high environmental impact, including responsible for carbon emissions and climate change. Insufficient research has been conducted on environmental sustainability activities in dialysis therapy in Japan.

METHODS

We conducted an online Green Survey comprising 30 question items based on a previously conducted survey in Australia. Between August and September 2023, this was sent to members of the Japanese Association of Dialysis Physicians, including hospital and clinic physicians, working across 885 dialysis facilities in Japan.

RESULTS

In total, 255 (29%) facilities responded to the survey. More than half of the facilities (n = 157; 61.6%) responded that they did not have a strategy, policy, or action plan for environmental sustainability. In four-fifths of the facilities (n = 208; 81.6%), no "green team" or committee had been formed to promote environmental protection. By contrast, most of the surveyed facilities had emergency strategies for natural disasters, such as covering for patient visits and staff commuting during extreme weather conditions (n = 169; 66.3%), water shortages (n = 159; 62.4%), and power outages (n = 188; 73.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Following the UK, Australia and New Zealand, and Portugal, this is the fourth Green Survey to be conducted, and the first on environmental sustainability among kidney health-care providers in Japan. The results indicated that daily activities for environmental protection are still lacking at many facilities, even though the management of dialysis treatment during a natural disaster is well conducted.

Green Dialysis From the Indian Perspective: A Systematic Review

Global warming and climate change represent the most significant threats to humanity in the 21st century, both of which are manmade catastrophes. Addressing climate change requires corrective action across all aspects of modern human life and work, including the medical field. Among healthcare sectors, dialysis units stand out as major contributors to plastic waste and excessive water consumption. It is imperative for hemodialysis units to lead by example in the judicious use of natural resources. This systemic review is aimed to establish a bare minimum of recommendations for environmental sustainability across Indian dialysis units, and to guide future initiatives to reduce the environmental impact of dialysis process. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, and Google to retrieve articles or studies related to green dialysis. The predefined keyword search yielded a total of 291 studies. A total of 54 studies and articles which were relevant to study question, and fulfilled inclusion criteria, were retrieved and analyzed to form opinions on the implementation of green dialysis initiatives from an Indian perspective. Green dialysis initiatives are much-needed reforms to be adopted by the Indian dialysis community. Through careful planning and minimal efforts, substantial amounts of water used in hemodialysis can be conserved and repurposed for other hospital activities. Similarly, the vast majority of discarded plastic waste can be recycled or reused. Despite controversy, reconsidering the risk-benefit aspects of dialyzer reuse is essential, particularly in the context of resource-limited developing nations like India.

A Pilot Study on the Safety and Adequacy of a Novel Ecofriendly Hemodialysis Prescription-Green Nephrology

Introduction

Hemodialysis (HD) units require large quantities of water. To reduce water consumption without compromising the adequacy and safety of dialysis, we studied a novel HD prescription with high temperature and low flow dialysate.

Methods

This was a single-center nonrandomized open-label cross-over pilot trial in patients with end-stage kidney disease on maintenance HD. Each participant was subjected to 3 different dialysis prescriptions for 1 month each as follows: (i) normal temperature with normal flow dialysate (NTNF prescription), (ii) high temperature with normal flow dialysate (HTNF prescription), and (iii) high temperature with low flow dialysate (HTLF prescription). The primary outcome, assessed at the end of each dialysis session, was the delivery of "adequate" dialysis, as defined by a single-pool Kt/V (spKt/V) ≥1.2. Outcomes were evaluated by comparing the NTNF and HTLF prescriptions.

Results

A total of 863 sessions of HD were performed in 30 patients over 3 months, with 287 to 288 sessions in each of the 3 dialysis prescriptions. The primary outcome was not significantly different between the NTNF prescription (202 sessions [70.14%]) and the HTLF prescription (198 sessions [68.75%]) (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.52; P = 0.45). The mean spKt/V and urea reduction ratio (URR) were not significantly different. Clinically evident hemodynamic instability occurred in only 1 dialysis session in the HTNF prescription.

Conclusion

Increasing dialysate temperature while reducing dialysate flow rate (QD) can be used as a water conservation strategy without compromising the adequacy and safety of dialysis in young and hemodynamically stable patients. Reducing the QD from 500 ml/min to 300 ml/min reduces water consumption by 40%.

Chronic kidney disease, dialysis and climate change

Chronic Kidney Disease is a serious public health problem and in clear relation to Climate Change and ecosystem maintenance. Renal health is particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, and dialysis therapy (hemodialysis and PD) has a significant environmental footprint, conditioned by energy consumption and greenhouse gas production. In the last 50 years, people have changed ecosystems faster and more extensively than in any other period in human history. It is a consequence of ever-increasing demand for food, fresh water, fuel, industry, etc. and the result has been a substantial and largely irreversible loss of the diversity of life on Earth. Since 1979, human activities have caused the extinction of 60% of mammals, birds, fish and reptiles. There is an urgent need to adopt "Green Nephrology" measures by developing sustainable environmental solutions for the prevention and treatment of kidney diseases.

Nephrology Nurses: Essential Professionals in Sustainable Kidney Care

Purpose

The increasing frequency of extreme climate events underscores the need for urgent action on climate change. The health care system contributes 4.6% of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) in Canada; thus, it is a major contributor to the country's carbon footprint. Kidney care in particular can involve high amounts of waste (eg, plastic and consumable waste associated with dialysis, transportation, emissions, energy, and water consumption). Therefore, sustainability initiatives within the health care system, and especially in the context of kidney care, have great potential to make a positive impact on planetary health. Here, we outline ways in which nephrology nurses can expand our duty of care to the environment and incorporate sustainability into our work.

Sources of information

A small advisory group of nephrology nurses in partnership with the Canadian Association of Nurses for the Environment (CANE) assessed ways that sustainable practices can be incorporated into nephrology nursing. Drawing on the Planetary Health Care model used by the Canadian Society of Nephrology: Sustainable Nephrology Action Planning (SNAP) committee, we assessed how the model could be adapted in the context of kidney care using 3 main actionable themes in their work: reducing the demand for health services, matching the supply of health services with demand, and reducing emissions from the supply of health services. We also reviewed and selected real-world examples of initiatives pursued by colleagues.

Key findings

Through this established framework, we provide recommendations and case examples for nephrology nurses to expand our duty of care to the environment. We describe nursing-led strategies used in Canada to improve environmental sustainability in kidney programs and consider their applicability to other renal programs. In 1 case example, we show how a simple nurse-led initiative at a single dialysis clinic can lower plastic waste and associated costs by $2042.59 per year. More broadly, we provide recommendations and actions for nephrology nurses to improve environmental sustainability in kidney care.

Limitations

Nurses in Canada have many responsibilities within limited timeframes, making it essential to choose sustainable practices that do not exacerbate burnout and high workloads. For sustainable practices to be successful, nurses must integrate them into their existing workflows.

Relationship between number of daily exchanges at CAPD start with clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) continues to be demanding for patients affected by kidney failure. In kidney failure patients with residual kidney function, the employment of incremental PD, a less onerous dialytic prescription, could translate into a decrease burden on both health systems and patients.

METHODS

Between 1st January 2009 and 31st December 2021, 182 patients who started continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) at our institution were included in the study. The CAPD population was divided into three groups according to the initial number of daily CAPD exchanges prescribed: one or two (50 patients, CAPD-1/2 group), three (97 patients, CAPD-3 group) and four (35 patients, CAPD-4 group), respectively.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis showed a difference in term of peritonitis free survival in CAPD-1/2 in comparison to CAPD-3 (hazard ratio (HR): 2.20, p = 0.014) and CAPD-4 (HR: 2.98, p < 0.01). A tendency towards a lower hospitalisation rate (CAPD-3 and CAPD-4 vs. CAPD-1/2, p = 0.11 and 0.13, respectively) and decreased mortality (CAPD-3 and CAPD-4 vs. CAPD-1/2, p = 0.13 and 0.22, respectively) in patients who started PD with less than three daily exchanges was detected. No discrepancy of the difference of the mean values between baseline and 24 months residual kidney function was observed among the three groups (p = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

One- or two-exchange CAPD start was associated with a lower risk of peritonitis in comparison to three- or four-exchange start. Furthermore, an initial PD prescription with less than three exchanges may be associated with an advantage in term of hospitalisation rate and patient survival.

Failing kidneys: Hotspots, blind spots and biopolitics of indifference

Chronic kidney disease of non-traditional cause (CKDnt) is commonly associated with monocropping agriculture, heat stress and impoverished working conditions, referred to as CKDnt "hotspots." The condition is also emerging in various sites of environmental contamination, raising questions as to whether multiple variants of the condition exist as a result of different ecologies and different human-environment interactions. This paper examines the emergence of CKDnt around Lake Chapala in Mexico, where we document local efforts to gain recognition and reparation for CKDnt. We follow the ways patients, families and activists have mobilized specific and interlocking infrastructural failures to enact complaint and confront state inaction and neglect of their bodies, communities, and environments. Though their labors have formally achieved little, we discuss how they make visible a biopolitics of indifference, one bound to the production of structural "blindspots."

Providing environmentally sustainable nephrology care: focus in low- and middle-income countries

Health care on a global scale significantly contributes to carbon emissions, with high-income countries being the primary culprits. Within health care, dialysis plays a significant role as a major source of emissions. Low- and middle-income countries have a high burden of kidney disease and are facing an increasing demand for dialysis. This reality presents multiple opportunities to plan for environmentally sustainable and quality kidney care. By placing a stronger emphasis on primary and secondary prevention of kidney disease and its progression, within the framework of universal health coverage, as well as empowering patients to enhance self-care, we can significantly reduce the need for costly and environmentally detrimental kidney replacement therapy. Mandating the adoption of lean and innovative low-carbon dialysis practices while also promoting the growth of kidney transplantation would enable low- and middle-income countries to take the lead in implementing environmentally friendly nephrology practices and reducing costs, thus optimizing sustainability and the well-being of individuals living with kidney disease.

Climate crisis and nephrology: a review of climate change's impact on nephrology and how to combat it

Climate change is worsening with tangible effects on our healthcare system. This review aims to examine the repercussions of the climate change on nephrology and explore potential strategies to mitigate its impact. This review examines dialysis's environmental impact, resource recycling methods, and plant-based diets for kidney health. Recent research highlights the advantages of plant-based diets in managing and preventing chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its complications. Integrating these practices can significantly lessen the environmental impact of nephrology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study is to discuss the bidirectional relationship of climate change and kidney disease and the impact of nephrology on climate change and to discuss potential solutions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Each dialysis session consumes significant amounts of resource; reusing them will aid the environment. Plant-based diets slow renal disease and have a lower carbon footprint, making them ecologically friendly.

SUMMARY

Climate change is a growing threat to population health and healthcare. Rising temperatures raise the risk of kidney problems. Dialysis treatments also impact the environment through its high resource requirements while generating high volumes of waste and greenhouse gases. Opportunities exist to reduce the environmental impact of dialysis treatments. Plant-based diets serve to benefit both kidney disease and the environment.

The climate impact of dialysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A reciprocal relationship currently exists between climate change and healthcare, mutually influencing each other. There have been significant planetary shifts in recent decades, marked by escalating temperatures, frequent natural calamities, a disturbing surge in climate-linked fatalities, and a heightened incidence of kidney disease diagnoses.

RECENT FINDINGS

Dialysis, a life-preserving treatment for kidney failure, extends to 2-3 million patients globally, mainly through in-centre haemodialysis. This treatment exerts an environmental toll, contributing to the healthcare sector's carbon footprint through water usage, energy consumption, waste generation, and current procurement practices. Diligent scrutiny and data collection of these facets have spurred sustainability initiatives, beginning at the local level with water, energy, and waste management. Still, this represents just the tip of the iceberg, with a pressing need for more comprehensive and habitual sustainable dialysis practices.

SUMMARY

This review examines the carbon footprint from dialysis, probes its ecological ramifications, and underscores potential solutions to lessen its climate impact.

Roadmaps to green nephrology: a mediterranean point of view

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Green nephrology is a movement whose aim is to find ways to reduce the environmental impact of kidney care. The question is of particular concern in this field since haemodialysis is one of the major contributors to waste generation, energy use and water consumption in healthcare. Although several ways for improving sustainability have been advocated, they are all context sensitive. This review aims to analyse the interventions that have been proposed to improve the ecologic sustainability and reduce the carbon footprint of nephrology care adapting to specific settings, and taking advantage of local expertise.

RECENT FINDINGS

Green hospitals are becoming a reality in several high-income settings, thanks to new building guidelines, with greater awareness of climate change and users' demands. Water saving is feasible, and is increasingly done, in different ways (improving hardware, reducing and adapting dialysate flows). Recycling noncontaminated plastic waste is feasible, but is still rarely performed. However, ecological transition has been slow even in high-income countries, while in low and middle-income countries lack of resources limit the ability to cope with the planet's urgent needs. Conversely, where man-power cost is low, some time-consuming tasks, such as separation of various components for recycling may be affordable. Theoretically, implementation of all clinical tasks aiming to avoid or retard dialysis, should be a priority.

SUMMARY

There is no single roadmap for achieving green nephrology. Each setting should start from those feasible interventions most in line with its specific needs and priorities.

Balancing the health benefits and climate mortality costs of haemodialysis

Extensive work is underway to quantify the carbon footprint of specific healthcare interventions and identify ways to minimise healthcare-related emissions; however, it remains unclear how to balance the relative benefits from delivering healthcare with the harm from the associated carbon footprint. To estimate emissions-related harms, we used the Mortality Cost of Carbon, a recently developed metric from environmental economics, which presents the impacts of carbon emissions in the form of excess deaths. We convert deaths into years of life lost and compare this with the healthy life years gained, under two temperature scenarios: 'Dynamic Integrated Climate Economy Model with an Endogenous Mortality Response' (DICE-EMR) (2.4°C) and 'DICE-Baseline' (4.1°C). As a case study, we use haemodialysis, a life-prolonging intervention with a large carbon footprint. We estimate that 19-53 and 10-25 healthy life years are gained from haemodialysis per year of life lost from the associated emissions in the DICE-EMR and DICE-Baseline scenarios, respectively, depending on the country and treatment regimen. This brings the distribution of harms, benefits and tradeoffs inherent to the decarbonisation of healthcare into sharper focus. More fully accounting for the harm imposed by carbon emissions could result in better value investments to lower the carbon footprint of interventions and support the implementation of the net-zero healthcare agenda.

Sustainable Development Goals: Challenges and the Role of the International Society of Nephrology in Improving Global Kidney Health

The United Nations 2030 agenda for sustainable development includes 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) that represent a universal call to end poverty and protect the planet, and are intended to guide government and private sector policies for international cooperation and optimal mobilization of resources. At the core of their achievement is reducing mortality by improving the global burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. CKD is the only NCD with a consistently rising age-adjusted mortality rate and is rising steadily up the list of the causes of lives lost globally. Kidney disease is strongly affected by social determinants of health, with a strong interplay between CKD incidence and progression and other NCDs and SDGs. Tackling the shared CKD and NCD risk factors will help with progress toward the SDGs and vice versa . Challenges to global kidney health include both preexisting socioeconomic factors and natural and human-induced disasters, many of which are intended to be addressed through actions proposed in the sustainable development agenda. Opportunities to address these challenges include public health policies focused on integrated kidney care, kidney disease surveillance, building strategic partnerships, building workforce capacity, harnessing technology and virtual platforms, advocacy/public awareness campaigns, translational and implementation research, and environmentally sustainable kidney care.

Home Dialysis in North America: The Current State

There is widespread interest in expanding the uptake of home dialysis in North America. Although kidney transplantation should be the preferred option in eligible patients, home hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) offer cost-effective options for KRT. In this review, the motivation for promoting home dialysis is presented, and the literature supporting it is critically reviewed. Randomized comparisons of home HD and PD with in-center HD have been challenging to conduct and provide only limited information. Nonrandomized studies are heterogeneous in their design and have often yielded conflicting results. They are prone to bias, and this must be carefully considered when evaluating this literature. Home modalities seem to have equivalent clinical outcomes and quality of life when compared with in-center HD. However, the cost of providing home therapies, particularly PD, is lower than conventional, in-center HD. Measures of home dialysis utilization, the philosophy behind their measurement, and important factors to consider when interpreting them are discussed. The importance of understanding measures of home dialysis utilization in the context of rates of kidney failure, the proportion of individuals who opt for conservative care, and rates of kidney transplantation is highlighted, and a framework for proposing targets is presented, using PD as an example.

Water implications in dialysis therapy, threats and opportunities to reduce water consumption: a call for the planet

Water is a dwindling natural resource, and potable water is wrongly considered an unlimited resource. Dialysis, particularly hemodialysis, is a water-hungry treatment that impacts the environment. The global annual water use of hemodialysis is approximately 265 million m3/yr. In this reference estimate, two-thirds of this water is represented by reverse osmosis reject water discharged into the drain. In this review, we would like to draw attention to the complexity and importance of water saving in hemodialysis. We propose that circular water management may comply with the "3R" concept: reduce (reduce dialysis need, reduce dialysate flow, and optimize reverse osmosis performance), reuse (reuse wastewater as potable water), and recycle (dialysis effluents for agriculture and aquaponic use). Awareness and sustainability should be integrated to create positive behaviors. Effective communication is crucial for water savings because local perspectives may lead to global opportunities. Besides the positive environmental impacts, planet-friendly alternatives may have significant financial returns. Innovative policies based on the transition from linear to circular water management may lead to a paradigm shift and establish a sustainable water management model. This review seeks to support policymakers in making informed decisions about water use, avoiding wasting, and finding solutions that may be planet friendly and patient friendly in dialysis, especially in hemodialysis treatments.

Our shared responsibility: the urgent necessity of global environmentally sustainable kidney care

In response to Earth's accelerating climate crisis, we, an international group of nephrologists, call on our global community to unite and align kidney care in accordance with United Nation's 26th Conference of the Parties health sector principles. We announce a global and inclusive initiative, "GREEN-K": Global Environmental Evolution in Nephrology and Kidney Care, with a vision of "sustainable kidney care for a healthy planet and healthy kidneys" and mission to "promote and support environmentally sustainable and resilient kidney care globally through advocacy, education, and collaboration." A patient-centric approach that permits climate change mitigation and adaptation is proposed. Multi-stakeholder GREEN-K action and focus areas will include education, sustainable clinical care, and advances toward environmentally sustainable innovations, procurement, and infrastructure. Mindful of the disproportionately high climate impact of kidney therapies, we welcome the opportunity to work together in shared accountability to patients and Earth's natural systems.

Anthropological perspectives on CKDnt in Mexico: time for a paradigm shift on the social determinants of health

In Mexico, the kidneys of individuals in poor and marginalized communities are failing with little warning and no explanation. Commonly referred to as chronic kidney disease of non-traditional origin (CKDnt), this new variant of kidney disease cannot be accounted for by conventional or discrete etiological explanations, but is instead understood to be a consequence of economic development, environmental degradation and precarious working and living conditions. Drawing on two interconnected ethnographic studies, and the intertwining problems of causation and care, this paper will (1) document the social conditions of disease emergence around Lake Chapala, Central Mexico, and (2) follow the haphazard routes kidney patients take to access resource-intensive biotechnical treatments. Its aim is to both challenge and reconceptualize social determinants as social relations in order to fully account for the profoundly contextual, temporal, and dynamic character of this condition, and to rethink opportunities for care and intervention.