1
|
Groß-Albenhausen E, Weier A, Velten M, Heider T, Chunder R, Kuerten S. Immune monitoring of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell and B cell responses in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with ocrelizumab. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1254128. [PMID: 37841269 PMCID: PMC10569464 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1254128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Since the development of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2), there has been significant interest in determining the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients under immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of ocrelizumab, a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, on SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell and B cell responses in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods To this end, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from n = 23 patients with RRMS. Of these patients, n = 17 were tested before (time point t0) and one month after (time point t1) their first dose of ocrelizumab. In addition, we studied n = 9 RRMS patients that got infected with SARS-CoV-2 over the course of ocrelizumab therapy (time point t2). PBMCs were also isolated from n = 19 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HCs) after vaccination or infection with SARS-CoV-2, respectively. Interferon-γ (IFN-γ)/interleukin-2 (IL-2) and granzyme B (GzB)/perforin (PFN) double-color enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays or single-color ELISPOT assays were performed to measure SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific T cell and B cell responses. Anti-viral antibody titers were quantified in the serum by chemiluminescence immunoassay. Results Our data indicate a significant difference in the SARS-CoV-2 specific IFN-γ (P = 0.0119) and PFN (P = 0.0005) secreting T cell compartment in the MS cohort at t0 compared to HCs. Following the first dose of ocrelizumab treatment, a significant decrease in the number of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-specific B cells was observed (P = 0.0012). Infection with SARS-CoV-2 in MS patients under ocrelizumab therapy did not significantly alter their existing immune response against the virus. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis suggested that the spike S1 protein-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)G response might be a key parameter for predicting the probability of (re)infection with SARS-CoV-2. Discussion Our results call for a critical discussion regarding appropriate vaccination intervals and potential biomarkers for the prediction of (re)infection with SARS-CoV-2 in patients with MS receiving ocrelizumab. Unique identifier DRKS00029110; URL: http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elina Groß-Albenhausen
- Institute of Neuroanatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bonn and University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Alicia Weier
- Institute of Neuroanatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bonn and University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Markus Velten
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thorsten Heider
- Clinic for Neurology, Klinikum St. Marien Amberg, Amberg, Germany
| | - Rittika Chunder
- Institute of Neuroanatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bonn and University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stefanie Kuerten
- Institute of Neuroanatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bonn and University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Otero-Romero S, Lebrun-Frénay C, Reyes S, Amato MP, Campins M, Farez M, Filippi M, Hacohen Y, Hemmer B, Juuti R, Magyari M, Oreja-Guevara C, Siva A, Vukusic S, Tintoré M. ECTRIMS/EAN consensus on vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis: Improving immunization strategies in the era of highly active immunotherapeutic drugs. Mult Scler 2023; 29:904-925. [PMID: 37293841 PMCID: PMC10338708 DOI: 10.1177/13524585231168043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the new highly active drugs available for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), vaccination becomes an essential part of the risk management strategy. OBJECTIVE To develop a European evidence-based consensus for the vaccination strategy of pwMS who are candidates for disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). METHODS This work was conducted by a multidisciplinary working group using formal consensus methodology. Clinical questions (defined as population, interventions, and outcomes) considered all authorized DMTs and vaccines. A systematic literature search was conducted and quality of evidence was defined according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. The recommendations were formulated based on the quality of evidence and the risk-benefit balance. RESULTS Seven questions, encompassing vaccine safety, vaccine effectiveness, global vaccination strategy and vaccination in sub-populations (pediatric, pregnant women, elderly and international travelers) were considered. A narrative description of the evidence considering published studies, guidelines, and position statements is presented. A total of 53 recommendations were agreed by the working group after three rounds of consensus. CONCLUSION This first European consensus on vaccination in pwMS proposes the best vaccination strategy according to current evidence and expert knowledge, with the goal of homogenizing the immunization practices in pwMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Otero-Romero
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital, Barcelona, Spain Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Saúl Reyes
- Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Maria Pia Amato
- Department NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Florence, Italy IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy
| | - Magda Campins
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mauricio Farez
- Centro para la Investigación de Enfermedades Neuroinmunológicas (CIEN), FLENI, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy Neurology Unit, Neurorehabilitation Unit, and Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Yael Hacohen
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Bernhard Hemmer
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Rosa Juuti
- Multiple Sclerosis International Federation, London, UK
| | - Melinda Magyari
- Department of Neurology, Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center and the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Celia Oreja-Guevara
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aksel Siva
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sandra Vukusic
- Service de Neurologie, Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-inflammation, Centre de Référence des Maladies Inflammatoires Rares du Cerveau et de la Moelle, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Centre des Neurosciences de Lyon, Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques, INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR5292, Lyon, France Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | - Mar Tintoré
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gao F, Mallajosyula V, Arunachalam PS, van der Ploeg K, Manohar M, Röltgen K, Yang F, Wirz O, Hoh R, Haraguchi E, Lee JY, Willis R, Ramachandiran V, Li J, Kathuria KR, Li C, Lee AS, Shah MM, Sindher SB, Gonzalez J, Altman JD, Wang TT, Boyd SD, Pulendran B, Jagannathan P, Nadeau KC, Davis MM. Spheromers reveal robust T cell responses to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and attenuated peripheral CD8 + T cell responses post SARS-CoV-2 infection. Immunity 2023; 56:864-878.e4. [PMID: 36996809 PMCID: PMC10017386 DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
T cells are a critical component of the response to SARS-CoV-2, but their kinetics after infection and vaccination are insufficiently understood. Using "spheromer" peptide-MHC multimer reagents, we analyzed healthy subjects receiving two doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine. Vaccination resulted in robust spike-specific T cell responses for the dominant CD4+ (HLA-DRB1∗15:01/S191) and CD8+ (HLA-A∗02/S691) T cell epitopes. Antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were asynchronous, with the peak CD4+ T cell responses occurring 1 week post the second vaccination (boost), whereas CD8+ T cells peaked 2 weeks later. These peripheral T cell responses were elevated compared with COVID-19 patients. We also found that previous SARS-CoV-2 infection resulted in decreased CD8+ T cell activation and expansion, suggesting that previous infection can influence the T cell response to vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Gao
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Vamsee Mallajosyula
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Prabhu S Arunachalam
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kattria van der Ploeg
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Monali Manohar
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University and Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Katharina Röltgen
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Fan Yang
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Oliver Wirz
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ramona Hoh
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Emily Haraguchi
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ji-Yeun Lee
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Richard Willis
- Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Jiefu Li
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Karan Raj Kathuria
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Chunfeng Li
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Alexandra S Lee
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University and Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Mihir M Shah
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University and Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sayantani B Sindher
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University and Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Joseph Gonzalez
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - John D Altman
- Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Taia T Wang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Scott D Boyd
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University and Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Bali Pulendran
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Prasanna Jagannathan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kari C Nadeau
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University and Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard, MA, USA
| | - Mark M Davis
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee MX, Peng S, Lee ARYB, Wong SY, Tay RYK, Li J, Tariq A, Goh CXY, Tan YK, Tan BKJ, Teo CB, Chan E, Ooi M, Chng WJ, Chee CE, Ho CLF, Walsh RJ, Wong M, Su Y, Alexander L, Sethi SK, Tan SSY, Chan YH, Tan KB, Lee SC, Chai LYA, Sundar R. Clinical efficacy and long-term immunogenicity of an early triple dose regimen of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in cancer patients. ANNALS OF THE ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, SINGAPORE 2023. [DOI: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Three doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines have been recommended for cancer patients to reduce the risk of severe disease. Anti-neoplastic treatment, such as chemotherapy, may affect long-term vaccine immunogenicity.
Method: Patients with solid or haematological cancer were recruited from 2 hospitals between July 2021 and March 2022. Humoral response was evaluated using GenScript cPASS surrogate virus neutralisation assays. Clinical outcomes were obtained from medical records and national mandatory-reporting databases.
Results: A total of 273 patients were recruited, with 40 having haematological malignancies and the rest solid tumours. Among the participants, 204 (74.7%) were receiving active cancer therapy, including 98 (35.9%) undergoing systemic chemotherapy and the rest targeted therapy or immunotherapy. All patients were seronegative at baseline. Seroconversion rates after receiving 1, 2 and 3 doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination were 35.2%, 79.4% and 92.4%, respectively. After 3 doses, patients on active treatment for haematological malignancies had lower antibodies (57.3%±46.2) when compared to patients on immunotherapy (94.1%±9.56, P<0.05) and chemotherapy (92.8%±18.1, P<0.05). SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported in 77 (28.2%) patients, of which 18 were severe. No patient receiving a third dose within 90 days of the second dose experienced severe infection.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates the benefit of early administration of the third dose among cancer patients.
Keywords: Cancer, oncology, SARS-CoV-2, third dose, vaccination
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Siyu Peng
- National University Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Shi Yin Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ryan Yong Kiat Tay
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jiaqi Li
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Areeba Tariq
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Claire Xin Yi Goh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ying Kiat Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Chong Boon Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Esther Chan
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Melissa Ooi
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wee Joo Chng
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cheng Ean Chee
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Carol LF Ho
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Maggie Wong
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yan Su
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore
| | - Lezhava Alexander
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore
| | | | | | - Yiong Huak Chan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Soo-Chin Lee
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Raghav Sundar
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Somogyi E, Kremlitzka M, Csiszovszki Z, Molnár L, Lőrincz O, Tóth J, de Waal L, Pattijn S, Reineking W, Beineke A, Tőke ER. T cell immunity ameliorates COVID-19 disease severity and provides post-exposure prophylaxis after peptide-vaccination, in Syrian hamsters. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1111629. [PMID: 36761759 PMCID: PMC9902696 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1111629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The emergence of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants that resist neutralizing antibodies drew the attention to cellular immunity and calls for the development of alternative vaccination strategies to combat the pandemic. Here, we have assessed the kinetics of T cell responses and protective efficacy against severe COVID-19 in pre- and post-exposure settings, elicited by PolyPEPI-SCoV-2, a peptide based T cell vaccine. Methods 75 Syrian hamsters were immunized subcutaneously with PolyPEPI-SCoV-2 on D0 and D14. On D42, hamsters were intranasally challenged with 102 TCID50 of the virus. To analyze immunogenicity by IFN-γ ELISPOT and antibody secretion, lymphoid tissues were collected both before (D0, D14, D28, D42) and after challenge (D44, D46, D49). To measure vaccine efficacy, lung tissue, throat swabs and nasal turbinate samples were assessed for viral load and histopathological changes. Further, body weight was monitored on D0, D28, D42 and every day after challenge. Results The vaccine induced robust activation of T cells against all SARS-CoV-2 structural proteins that were rapidly boosted after virus challenge compared to control animals (~4-fold, p<0.05). A single dose of PolyPEPI-SCoV-2 administered one day after challenge also resulted in elevated T cell response (p<0.01). The vaccination did not induce virus-specific antibodies and viral load reduction. Still, peptide vaccination significantly reduced body weight loss (p<0.001), relative lung weight (p<0.05) and lung lesions (p<0.05), in both settings. Conclusion Our study provides first proof of concept data on the contribution of T cell immunity on disease course and provide rationale for the use of T cell-based peptide vaccines against both novel SARS-CoV-2 variants and supports post-exposure prophylaxis as alternative vaccination strategy against COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eszter Somogyi
- Treos Bio Ltd, London, United Kingdom
- Treos Bio Zrt, Veszprém, Hungary
- PepTC Vaccines Ltd, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mariann Kremlitzka
- Treos Bio Ltd, London, United Kingdom
- Treos Bio Zrt, Veszprém, Hungary
- PepTC Vaccines Ltd, London, United Kingdom
| | - Zsolt Csiszovszki
- Treos Bio Ltd, London, United Kingdom
- Treos Bio Zrt, Veszprém, Hungary
- PepTC Vaccines Ltd, London, United Kingdom
| | - Levente Molnár
- Treos Bio Ltd, London, United Kingdom
- Treos Bio Zrt, Veszprém, Hungary
- PepTC Vaccines Ltd, London, United Kingdom
| | - Orsolya Lőrincz
- Treos Bio Ltd, London, United Kingdom
- Treos Bio Zrt, Veszprém, Hungary
- PepTC Vaccines Ltd, London, United Kingdom
| | - József Tóth
- Treos Bio Ltd, London, United Kingdom
- Treos Bio Zrt, Veszprém, Hungary
- PepTC Vaccines Ltd, London, United Kingdom
| | - Leon de Waal
- Viroclinics Biosciences B.V., Viroclinics Xplore, Schaijk, Netherlands
| | - Sofie Pattijn
- ImmunXperts Société Anonyme, Q2 Solutions Company, Gosselies, Belgium
| | - Wencke Reineking
- Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Andreas Beineke
- Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Enikő R. Tőke
- Treos Bio Ltd, London, United Kingdom
- Treos Bio Zrt, Veszprém, Hungary
- PepTC Vaccines Ltd, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Multiple sclerosis in the era of COVID-19: disease course, DMTs and SARS-CoV2 vaccinations. Curr Opin Neurol 2022; 35:319-327. [PMID: 35674075 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000001066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW As of January 21st 2022, over 340 million are confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), including nearly 5.6 million deaths. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is neurotropic and affects the neural parenchyma through direct viral invasion from the nasal mucosa and postinfectious cytokine storm. Further challenges of SARS-CoV-2 infection are nowadays linked to variants of concern. Multiple sclerosis is an inflammatory and progressive degenerative disorder of the central nervous system commonly affecting young adults and potentially generating irreversible disability. Since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) have been considered 'extra' vulnerable because of the immune-mediated nature of the disease, the disability status, and the immunomodulatory therapies potentially increasing the risk for viral infection. Today multiple sclerosis neurologists are faced with several challenges in the management of pwMS to both prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection and protection from disease worsening. We aimed to highlight today's most relevant facts about the complex management of pwMS in the COVID-19 era. RECENT FINDINGS The incidence of COVID-19 among pwMS does not differ from the general population. The prognosis of COVID-19 among pwMS is driven by older age, male sex, nonambulatory status, comorbidity as in the general population, as well as by corticosteroid treatment and B-cell depleting agents which decrease seropositivity from SARS-CoV-2 infection and immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. SUMMARY Disease modifying treatments (DMTs) should be regularly continued in relation to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, but an ad hoc timing is required with B-cell depleting agents. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is recommended in pwMS with willingness improving through health education programs. Multiple sclerosis does not seem to worsen after SARS-Cov2 vaccination but COVID-19 may enhance disease activity.
Collapse
|