Systems-level effects of allosteric perturbations to a model molecular switch

The energetic and allosteric landscape for KRAS inhibition

Thousands of proteins have been validated genetically as therapeutic targets for human diseases1. However, very few have been successfully targeted, and many are considered 'undruggable'. This is particularly true for proteins that function via protein-protein interactions-direct inhibition of binding interfaces is difficult and requires the identification of allosteric sites. However, most proteins have no known allosteric sites, and a comprehensive allosteric map does not exist for any protein. Here we address this shortcoming by charting multiple global atlases of inhibitory allosteric communication in KRAS. We quantified the effects of more than 26,000 mutations on the folding of KRAS and its binding to six interaction partners. Genetic interactions in double mutants enabled us to perform biophysical measurements at scale, inferring more than 22,000 causal free energy changes. These energy landscapes quantify how mutations tune the binding specificity of a signalling protein and map the inhibitory allosteric sites for an important therapeutic target. Allosteric propagation is particularly effective across the central β-sheet of KRAS, and multiple surface pockets are genetically validated as allosterically active, including a distal pocket in the C-terminal lobe of the protein. Allosteric mutations typically inhibit binding to all tested effectors, but they can also change the binding specificity, revealing the regulatory, evolutionary and therapeutic potential to tune pathway activation. Using the approach described here, it should be possible to rapidly and comprehensively identify allosteric target sites in many proteins.

Designed allosteric protein logic

The regulation of protein function by external or internal signals is one of the key features of living organisms. The ability to directly control the function of a selected protein would represent a valuable tool for regulating biological processes. Here, we present a generally applicable regulation of proteins called INSRTR, based on inserting a peptide into a loop of a target protein that retains its function. We demonstrate the versatility and robustness of coiled-coil-mediated regulation, which enables designs for either inactivation or activation of selected protein functions, and implementation of two-input logic functions with rapid response in mammalian cells. The selection of insertion positions in tested proteins was facilitated by using a predictive machine learning model. We showcase the robustness of the INSRTR strategy on proteins with diverse folds and biological functions, including enzymes, signaling mediators, DNA binders, transcriptional regulators, reporters, and antibody domains implemented as chimeric antigen receptors in T cells. Our findings highlight the potential of INSRTR as a powerful tool for precise control of protein function, advancing our understanding of biological processes and developing biotechnological and therapeutic interventions.

Emerging maps of allosteric regulation in cellular networks

Allosteric regulation is classically defined as action at a distance, where a perturbation outside of a protein active site affects function. While this definition has motivated many studies of allosteric mechanisms at the level of protein structure, translating these insights to the allosteric regulation of entire cellular processes - and their crosstalk - has received less attention, despite the broad importance of allostery for cellular regulation foreseen by Jacob and Monod. Here, we revisit an evolutionary model for the widespread emergence of allosteric regulation in colocalized proteins, describe supporting evidence, and discuss emerging advances in mapping allostery in cellular networks that link precise and often allosteric perturbations at the molecular level to functional changes at the pathway and systems levels.

Recent breakthroughs in computational structural biology harnessing the power of sequences and structures

Recent advances in computational approaches and their integration into structural biology enable tackling increasingly complex questions. Here, we discuss several key areas, highlighting breakthroughs and remaining challenges. Theoretical modeling has provided tools to accurately predict and design protein structures on a scale currently difficult to achieve using experimental approaches. Molecular Dynamics simulations have become faster and more precise, delivering actionable information inaccessible by current experimental methods. Virtual screening workflows allow a high-throughput approach to discover ligands that bind and modulate protein function, while Machine Learning methods enable the design of proteins with new functionalities. Integrative structural biology combines several of these approaches, pushing the frontiers of structural and functional characterization to ever larger systems, advancing towards a complete understanding of the living cell. These breakthroughs will accelerate and significantly impact diverse areas of science.

A complete allosteric map of a GTPase switch in its native cellular network

Allosteric regulation is central to protein function in cellular networks. A fundamental open question is whether cellular regulation of allosteric proteins occurs only at a few defined positions or at many sites distributed throughout the structure. Here, we probe the regulation of GTPases-protein switches that control signaling through regulated conformational cycling-at residue-level resolution by deep mutagenesis in the native biological network. For the GTPase Gsp1/Ran, we find that 28% of the 4,315 assayed mutations show pronounced gain-of-function responses. Twenty of the sixty positions enriched for gain-of-function mutations are outside the canonical GTPase active site switch regions. Kinetic analysis shows that these distal sites are allosterically coupled to the active site. We conclude that the GTPase switch mechanism is broadly sensitive to cellular allosteric regulation. Our systematic discovery of new regulatory sites provides a functional map to interrogate and target GTPases controlling many essential biological processes.

From systems to structure - using genetic data to model protein structures

Understanding the effects of genetic variation is a fundamental problem in biology that requires methods to analyse both physical and functional consequences of sequence changes at systems-wide and mechanistic scales. To achieve a systems view, protein interaction networks map which proteins physically interact, while genetic interaction networks inform on the phenotypic consequences of perturbing these protein interactions. Until recently, understanding the molecular mechanisms that underlie these interactions often required biophysical methods to determine the structures of the proteins involved. The past decade has seen the emergence of new approaches based on coevolution, deep mutational scanning and genome-scale genetic or chemical-genetic interaction mapping that enable modelling of the structures of individual proteins or protein complexes. Here, we review the emerging use of large-scale genetic datasets and deep learning approaches to model protein structures and their interactions, and discuss the integration of structural data from different sources.

Diverse Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Pathogenic Protein Mutations: Beyond the Loss-of-Function Paradigm

Most known disease-causing mutations occur in protein-coding regions of DNA. While some of these involve a loss of protein function (e.g., through premature stop codons or missense changes that destabilize protein folding), many act via alternative molecular mechanisms and have dominant-negative or gain-of-function effects. In nearly all cases, these non-loss-of-function mutations can be understood by considering interactions of the wild-type and mutant protein with other molecules, such as proteins, nucleic acids, or small ligands and substrates. Here, we review the diverse molecular mechanisms by which pathogenic mutations can have non-loss-of-function effects, including by disrupting interactions, increasing binding affinity, changing binding specificity, causing assembly-mediated dominant-negative and dominant-positive effects, creating novel interactions, and promoting aggregation and phase separation. We believe that increased awareness of these diverse molecular disease mechanisms will lead to improved diagnosis (and ultimately treatment) of human genetic disorders. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, Volume 23 is October 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.