Evolution of CAR T-cell immunotherapy in terms of patenting activity

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell and regulatory T cell therapy in non-oncology diseases: A narrative review of studies from 2017 to 2023

Recently, the remarkable success of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy in treating certain tumors has led to numerous studies exploring its potential application to treat non-oncology diseases. This review discusses the progress and evolution of CAR-T cell therapies for treating non-oncology diseases over the past 5 years. Additionally, we summarize the advantages and disadvantages of CAR-T cell therapy in treating non-oncological diseases and identify any difficulties that should be overcome. After conducting an in-depth analysis of the most recent studies on CAR-T technology, we discuss the key elements of CAR-T therapy, such as developing an effective CAR design for non-oncological diseases, controlling the rate and duration of response, and implementing safety measures to reduce toxicity. These studies provide new insights into different delivery strategies, the discovery of new target molecules, and improvements in the safety of CAR-T therapy for non-oncological diseases.

Patent landscape analysis-Contributing to the identification of technology trends and informing research and innovation funding policy

Patents and the systematic analysis thereof provide important decision information for a range of stakeholders pursuing diverse goals. However, in particular academia and small-scale private sector innovators underappreciate the value of patent information for identifying research gaps, ensuring originality of their work and, in turn, maximisation of limited (public) funds. By the same token, pertinent public sector organisations, such as regulators, require overviews of potentially upcoming technologies to adequately adapt regulatory protocols. The latter, in particular if contemporary scientific evidence is not sufficient, can require a substantial amount of time and lead to a delay in the marketing of important innovations. Patent landscape analysis (PLA) is a very useful method to create overviews of technology fields and thereby indicate if, inter alia, a specific line of scientific enquiry and its application have already been pursued or potential regulatory gaps will exist in the near- to mid-term future. The objective of this communication is to increase awareness of the utility of patent information and provide support in retrieval and analysis of pertinent information for those involved in biotech R&D. Based on Espacenet, a patent search engine, we provide basic guidance on search strategy development, piloting and execution, and data preparation and analysis. To highlight the value of PLA, we also summarise selected results of a PLA we performed recently for microbiome targeting interventions, also referred to as live biotherapeutic products.

Development of CAR T Cell Therapy in Children-A Comprehensive Overview

CAR T cell therapy has revolutionized immunotherapy in the last decade with the successful establishment of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-expressing cellular therapies as an alternative treatment in relapsed and refractory CD19-positive leukemias and lymphomas. There are fundamental reasons why CAR T cell therapy has been approved by the Food and Drug administration and the European Medicines Agency for pediatric and young adult patients first. Commonly, novel therapies are developed for adult patients and then adapted for pediatric use, due to regulatory and commercial reasons. Both strategic and biological factors have supported the success of CAR T cell therapy in children. Since there is an urgent need for more potent and specific therapies in childhood malignancies, efforts should also include the development of CAR therapeutics and expand applicability by introducing new technologies. Basic aspects, the evolution and the drawbacks of childhood CAR T cell therapy are discussed as along with the latest clinically relevant information.

Adoptive T-cell Immunotherapy: Perfecting Self-Defenses

As an important part of the immune system, T lymphocytes exhibit undoubtedly an important role in targeting and eradicating cancer. However, despite these characteristics, their natural antitumor response may be insufficient. Numerous clinical trials in terminally ill cancer patients testing the design of novel and efficient immunotherapeutic approaches based on the adoptive transfer of autologous tumor-specific T lymphocytes have shown encouraging results. Moreover, this also led to the approval of engineered T-cell therapies in patients. Herein, we will expand on the development and the use of such strategies using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes or genetically engineered T-cells. We will also comment on the requirements and potential hurdles encountered when elaborating and implementing such treatments as well as the exciting prospects for this kind of emerging personalized medicine therapy.

Engineering Nano-Therapeutics to Boost Adoptive Cell Therapy for Cancer Treatment

Although adoptive transfer of therapeutic cells to cancer patients is demonstrated with great success and fortunately approved for the treatment of leukemia and B-cell lymphoma, potential issues, including the unclear mechanism, complicated procedures, unfavorable therapeutic efficacy for solid tumors, and side effects, still hinder its extensive applications. The explosion of nanotechnology recently has led to advanced development of novel strategies to address these challenges, facilitating the design of nano-therapeutics to improve adoptive cell therapy (ACT) for cancer treatment. In this review, the emerging nano-enabled approaches, that design multiscale artificial antigen-presenting cells for cell proliferation and stimulation in vitro, promote the transducing efficiency of tumor-targeting domains, engineer therapeutic cells for in vivo imaging, tumor infiltration, and in vivo functional sustainability, as well as generate tumoricidal T cells in vivo, are summarized. Meanwhile, the current challenges and future perspectives of the nanostrategy-based ACT for cancer treatment are also discussed in the end.

Health Economic Aspects of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapies for Hematological Cancers: Present and Future

Since 2018, 2 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies received approval from the European Medicine Agency, with list prices around 320 000 Euro (€) (EUR) per treatment. These high prices raise concerns for patient access and the sustainability of healthcare systems. We aimed to estimate the costs and budget impact associated with CAR T-cell therapies for current and future indications in hematological cancers from 2019 to 2029. We focused on the former France, Germany, Spain, Italy and the United Kingdom (EU-5) and the Netherlands. We conducted a review of list prices, health technology assessment reports, budget impact analysis dossiers, and published cost-effectiveness analyses. We forecasted the 10-year health expenditures on CAR T-cells for several hematological cancers in selected European Union countries. Nine cost-effectiveness studies were identified and list prices for CAR T-cell therapies ranged between 307 200 EUR and 350 000 EUR. Estimated additional costs for pre- and post-treatment were 50 359 EUR per patient, whereas the incremental costs of CAR T-cell therapy (when compared with care as usual) ranged between 276 086 EUR and 328 727 EUR. We estimated market entry of CAR T-cell therapies for chronic mantle cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, multiple myeloma, and acute myeloid leukemia in 2021, 2022, 2022, 2022, and 2025, respectively. Cumulative expenditure estimates for existing and future indications from 2019 to 2029 were on average 28.5 billion EUR, 32.8 billion EUR, and 28.9 billion EUR when considering CAR T-cell therapy costs only, CAR T-cell therapy costs including pre- and post-treatment, and incremental CAR T-cell therapy costs, respectively. CAR T-cell therapies seem to be promising treatment options for hematological cancers but the financial burden on healthcare systems in the former EU-5 and the Netherlands will contribute to a substantial rise in healthcare expenditure in the field of hematology.

The 100 Most Influential Studies in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell: A Bibliometric Analysis

Background: Bibliometric analyses are used to provide information on trends within a specific research field, along with indicators of the impact of a publication. With such an analysis, we map the scientific landscape of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) research to see the emerging topics and infer directions the field might take.

Methods: We extracted the 100 most-cited articles, published all periods (from 2008 to 2019) by the Web of Science Core Collection. Using their bibliographic details, including year of publication, country of author, research organization, author information, and keywords, we graph the networks created between the articles.

Results: Of the 100 papers identified, the majority (93%) were written in the USA. Notable was that 34 papers were published from the University of Pennsylvania. Regarding authors, Carl H. June participated in 29 researches, followed by Bruce L. Levine who participated in 12. As for journals, Blood (n = 19) published the most papers, followed by Science Translational Medicine (n = 9) and Cancer Research (n = 9). Lastly, the most frequently used keywords were “adoptive immunotherapy” (n = 47), “lymphocytes” (n = 27), and “antitumor activity” (n = 22).

Conclusion: By evaluating the top 100 most-cited papers in the CAR-T field, this study provides insight into the direction of the scientific growth and its trends, as well as information on the field's network structure.

Value and affordability of CAR T-cell therapy in the United States

In the United States the increasing number of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, innovative, and potentially effective commercial cancer therapies pose a significant financial burden on public and private payers. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are prototypical of this challenge. In 2017 and 2018, tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah, Novartis) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta, Kite) were approved by the FDA for use after showing groundbreaking results in relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. In 2020 and 2021, four further submissions to the FDA are expected for CAR T-cell therapies for indolent and aggressive B-cell malignancies and plasma cell myeloma. Yet, with marketed prices of over $350,000 per infusion for the two FDA-approved therapies and similar price tags expected for the coming products, serious concerns are raised over value and affordability. In this review we summarize recent, peer-reviewed cost-effectiveness studies of tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel in the United States; discuss key issues concerning the health plan budget impact of CAR T-cell therapy; and review policy, payment and scientific approaches that may improve the value and affordability of CAR T-cell therapy.

Biomarkers in individualized management of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy

The development of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immunotherapy has achieved promising results, both in clinical studies and in commercial products for patients with hematologic malignancies. Despite high remission rates of CAR-T cell therapy in previously untreatable, refractory and/or relapsed patients, several challenges in CAR-T therapy remain to be overcome, especially in integrating such therapies into personalized disease management approaches. Given the unique characteristics of CAR-T therapy, it is particularly urgent to identify biomarkers to maximize their clinical benefits. This systematic review summarizes clinically relevant biomarkers that may help individualized disease management in patients receiving CAR-T cell therapy in terms of toxicity warning, efficacy prediction and relapse monitoring. We summarize data from 18 clinical trials, including traditional indicators like cytokines, biochemical proteins, tumor burden, as well as potential novel indicators such as CAR-T cell expansion and persistency. The establishment of a biomarker-based system aimed at individualized management is recommended to guide better clinical application of CAR-T products.

Platforms for Clinical-Grade CAR-T Cell Expansion

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has revolutionized the immunotherapy field with high rate complete responses especially for hematological diseases. Despite the diversity of tumor specific-antigens, the manufacturing process is consistent and involves multiple steps, including selection of T cells, activation, genetic modification, and in vitro expansion. Among these complex manufacturing phases, the choice of culture system to generate a high number of functional cells needs to be evaluated and optimized. Flasks, bags, and rocking motion bioreactor are the most used platforms for CAR-T cell expansion in the current clinical trials but are far from being standardized. New processing options are available and a systematic effort seeking automation, standardization and the increase of production scale, would certainly help to bring the costs down and ultimately democratize this personalized therapy. In this review, we describe different cell expansion platforms available as well as the quality control requirements for clinical-grade production.

T Cell Reprogramming Against Cancer

Advances in academic and clinical studies during the last several years have resulted in practical outcomes in adoptive immune therapy of cancer. Immune cells can be programmed with molecular modules that increase their therapeutic potency and specificity. It has become obvious that successful immunotherapy must take into account the full complexity of the immune system and, when possible, include the use of multifactor cell reprogramming that allows fast adjustment during the treatment. Today, practically all immune cells can be stably or transiently reprogrammed against cancer. Here, we review works related to T cell reprogramming, as the most developed field in immunotherapy. We discuss factors that determine the specific roles of αβ and γδ T cells in the immune system and the structure and function of T cell receptors in relation to other structures involved in T cell target recognition and immune response. We also discuss the aspects of T cell engineering, specifically the construction of synthetic T cell receptors (synTCRs) and chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) and the use of engineered T cells in integrative multifactor therapy of cancer.

Anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma: can we do better?

Despite a substantial survival improvement and the availability of many new drugs in the last 2 decades, multiple myeloma (MM) remains largely incurable. Immunotherapeutic approaches are changing the current landscape in MM with B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) as one of the most promising target antigens. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy targeting BCMA produced unprecedented results in heavily pretreated relapsed and/or refractory MM. Data on more than 300 MM patients treated with anti-BCMA directed CAR T cells are available and these numbers are rapidly increasing. The response rate and the depth of responses induced by anti-BCMA CAR T cells are impressive; however, the majority of patients eventually relapse. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of response and resistance in treated MM patients will be critical to the rational development of this therapy. Moreover, the ideal place of this therapy in the treatment paradigm for MM is an important question that needs biological and clinical correlative data to help elucidate. T-cell-related, tumor-related and microenvironmental factors may play a role in the efficacy of anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy. In this review we summarize key clinical and correlative data on anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy. Based on available data we will try to highlight opportunities to further optimize this potential game-changing therapy for MM.

A Study on Technology Competition of Graphene Biomedical Technology Based on Patent Analysis

Graphene, with high biocompatibility, physiological solubility and stability, has been reported as an emerging material for biomedical applications such as biosensors, drug delivery, and tissue engineering. Recently, identifying the technological competition (TC) of graphene biomedical technology has received worldwide attention from stakeholders. However, few studies have attached great importance to review the TC of this field by the analysis of patents. The main objective of this study is to develop a new and comprehensive method to investigate TC in a given technology field by conducting a patent review and then employing a patent roadmap to dig out the technology opportunity. The effectiveness of the approach is verified with the case study on graphene biomedical technology. Compared to previous research, this study makes the following important contributions. First, this study provides a new and systematic framework for the dynamic analysis of TC in a given technology field. It also extends the research perspectives of TC for industry, assignees, and technology, employs a patent roadmap to dig out technology opportunities, and enables stakeholders to understand TC from a dynamic perspective. Second, this study integrates patent analysis with a patent roadmap that has not appeared in existing methodologies of patent review. Third, it first introduces indicators (e.g., high value patent and competition position of top assignees) to the previous patent roadmap and provides a new methodology for patent roadmaps from a country level and assignee level. Finally, this study provides useful information for stakeholders interested in graphene biomedical technology, helps them to find new technology opportunities in this field, encourages them to determine the direction of future research, and has important significance for its application to diverse other emerging technologies.