Replication fork uncoupling causes nascent strand degradation and fork reversal

Control of DNA replication in vitro using a reversible replication barrier

A major obstacle to studying DNA replication is that it involves asynchronous and highly delocalized events. A reversible replication barrier overcomes this limitation and allows replication fork movement to be synchronized and localized, facilitating the study of replication fork function and replication coupled repair. Here we provide details on establishing a reversible replication barrier in vitro and using it to monitor different aspects of DNA replication. DNA template containing an array of lac operator (lacO) sequences is first bound to purified lac repressor (LacR). This substrate is then replicated in vitro using a biochemical replication system, which results in replication forks stalled on either side of the LacR array regardless of when or where they arise. Once replication forks are synchronized at the barrier, isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside can be added to disrupt LacR binding so that replication forks synchronously resume synthesis. We describe how this approach can be employed to control replication fork elongation, termination, stalling and uncoupling, as well as assays that can be used to monitor these processes. We also explain how this approach can be adapted to control whether replication forks encounter a DNA lesion on the leading or lagging strand template and whether a converging fork is present. The required reagents can be prepared in 1-2 weeks and experiments using this approach are typically performed over 1-3 d. The main requirements for utilizing the LacR replication barrier are basic biochemical expertise and access to an in vitro system to study DNA replication. Investigators should also be trained in working with radioactive materials.

Disparate requirements for RAD54L in replication fork reversal

RAD54L is a DNA motor protein with multiple roles in homologous recombination DNA repair (HR). In vitro , RAD54L was shown to also catalyze the reversal and restoration of model replication forks. In cells, however, little is known about how RAD54L may regulate the dynamics of DNA replication. Here, we show that RAD54L restrains the progression of replication forks and functions as a fork remodeler in human cells. Analogous to HLTF, SMARCAL1, and FBH1, and consistent with a role in fork reversal, RAD54L decelerates fork progression in response to replication stress and suppresses the formation of replication-associated ssDNA gaps. Interestingly, loss of RAD54L prevents nascent strand DNA degradation in both BRCA1/2- and 53BP1-deficient cells, suggesting that RAD54L functions in both pathways of RAD51-mediated replication fork reversal. In the HLTF/SMARCAL1 pathway, RAD54L is critical, but its ability to catalyze branch migration is dispensable, indicative of its function downstream of HLTF/SMARCAL1. Conversely, in the FBH1 pathway, branch migration activity of RAD54L is essential, and FBH1 engagement is dependent on its concerted action with RAD54L. Collectively, our results reveal disparate requirements for RAD54L in two distinct RAD51-mediated fork reversal pathways, positing its potential as a future therapeutic target.

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of TIMELESS limits DNA replication stress and promotes stalled fork protection

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation), catalyzed mainly by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)1, is a key posttranslational modification involved in DNA replication and repair. Here, we report that TIMELESS (TIM), an essential scaffold of the replisome, is PARylated, which is linked to its proteolysis. TIM PARylation requires recognition of auto-modified PARP1 via two poly(ADP-ribose)-binding motifs, which primes TIM for proteasome-dependent degradation. Cells expressing the PARylation-refractory TIM mutant or under PARP inhibition accumulate TIM at DNA replication forks, causing replication stress and hyper-resection of stalled forks. Mechanistically, aberrant engagement of TIM with the replicative helicase impedes RAD51 loading and protection of reversed forks. Accordingly, defective TIM degradation hypersensitizes BRCA2-deficient cells to replication damage. Our study defines TIM as a substrate of PARP1 and elucidates how the control of replisome remodeling by PARylation is linked to stalled fork protection. Therefore, we propose a mechanism of PARP inhibition that impinges on the DNA replication fork instability caused by defective TIM turnover.

BRCA2 promotes genomic integrity and therapy resistance primarily through its role in homology-directed repair

Tumor suppressor BRCA2 functions in homology-directed repair (HDR), the protection of stalled replication forks, and the suppression of replicative gaps, but their relative contributions to genome integrity and chemotherapy response are under scrutiny. Here, we report that mouse and human cells require a RAD51 filament stabilization motif in BRCA2 for fork protection and gap suppression but not HDR. In mice, the loss of fork protection/gap suppression does not compromise genome stability or shorten tumor latency. By contrast, HDR deficiency increases spontaneous and replication stress-induced chromosome aberrations and tumor predisposition. Unlike with HDR, fork protection/gap suppression defects are also observed in Brca2 heterozygous cells, likely due to reduced RAD51 stabilization at stalled forks/gaps. Gaps arise from PRIMPOL activity, which is associated with 5-hydroxymethyl-2'-deoxyuridine sensitivity due to the formation of SMUG1-generated abasic sites and is exacerbated by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition. However, HDR proficiency has the major role in mitigating sensitivity to chemotherapeutics, including PARP inhibitors.

Looping out of control: R-loops in transcription-replication conflict

Transcription-replication conflict is a major cause of replication stress that arises when replication forks collide with the transcription machinery. Replication fork stalling at sites of transcription compromises chromosome replication fidelity and can induce DNA damage with potentially deleterious consequences for genome stability and organismal health. The block to DNA replication by the transcription machinery is complex and can involve stalled or elongating RNA polymerases, promoter-bound transcription factor complexes, or DNA topology constraints. In addition, studies over the past two decades have identified co-transcriptional R-loops as a major source for impairment of DNA replication forks at active genes. However, how R-loops impede DNA replication at the molecular level is incompletely understood. Current evidence suggests that RNA:DNA hybrids, DNA secondary structures, stalled RNA polymerases, and condensed chromatin states associated with R-loops contribute to the of fork progression. Moreover, since both R-loops and replication forks are intrinsically asymmetric structures, the outcome of R-loop-replisome collisions is influenced by collision orientation. Collectively, the data suggest that the impact of R-loops on DNA replication is highly dependent on their specific structural composition. Here, we will summarize our current understanding of the molecular basis for R-loop-induced replication fork progression defects.

The Response of the Replication Apparatus to Leading Template Strand Blocks

Duplication of the genome requires the replication apparatus to overcome a variety of impediments, including covalent DNA adducts, the most challenging of which is on the leading template strand. Replisomes consist of two functional units, a helicase to unwind DNA and polymerases to synthesize it. The helicase is a multi-protein complex that encircles the leading template strand and makes the first contact with a leading strand adduct. The size of the channel in the helicase would appear to preclude transit by large adducts such as DNA: protein complexes (DPC). Here we discuss some of the extensively studied pathways that support replication restart after replisome encounters with leading template strand adducts. We also call attention to recent work that highlights the tolerance of the helicase for adducts ostensibly too large to pass through the central channel.

Structural basis for stabilisation of the RAD51 nucleoprotein filament by BRCA2

The BRCA2 tumour suppressor protein preserves genomic integrity via interactions with the DNA-strand exchange RAD51 protein in homology-directed repair. The RAD51-binding TR2 motif at the BRCA2 C-terminus is essential for protection and restart of stalled replication forks. Biochemical evidence shows that TR2 recognises filamentous RAD51, but existing models of TR2 binding to RAD51 lack a structural basis. Here we used cryo-electron microscopy and structure-guided mutagenesis to elucidate the mechanism of TR2 binding to nucleoprotein filaments of human RAD51. We find that TR2 binds across the protomer interface in the filament, acting as a brace for adjacent RAD51 molecules. TR2 targets an acidic-patch motif on human RAD51 that serves as a recruitment hub in fission yeast Rad51 for recombination mediators Rad52 and Rad55-Rad57. Our findings provide a structural rationale for RAD51 filament stabilisation by BRCA2 and reveal a common recruitment mechanism of recombination mediators to the RAD51 filament.

Synergistic lethality between auranofin-induced oxidative DNA damage and ATR inhibition in cancer cells

AIMS

Studies in the past have shown that inhibition of the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase sensitizes cancer cells to genotoxic anticancer treatments, however, clinical use of ATR inhibitors in combination with DNA damaging chemotherapy is limited due to toxicity in healthy tissues. In this study, we investigated the synergistic anticancer effect between ATR inhibition and oxidative DNA damage induced by the thioredoxin reductase inhibitor auranofin.

MAIN METHODS

Cytotoxicity was evaluated by cell viability assays. Western blot, comet assay, immunostaining and flow cytometry were performed to dissect the underlying mechanisms. In vivo efficacy was examined against tumor xenografts.

KEY FINDINGS

Nontoxic doses of auranofin alone increased the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cancer but not noncancerous cells, resulting in oxidative DNA damage and activation of the ATR DNA damage response pathway selectively in cancer cells. Inhibition of ATR in auranofin-treated cancer cells resulted in unscheduled firing of dormant DNA replication origins, abrogation of the S phase cell cycle checkpoint and extensive DNA breakage, leading to replication catastrophe and potent synergistic lethality. Both the antioxidant NAC and the DNA polymerase inhibitor aphidicolin reduced replication stress and synergistic cytotoxicity, implicating replication stress-driven catastrophic cell death resulted from collision between oxidative DNA damage and dysregulated DNA replication. In vivo, auranofin and VE822 coadministration enabled marked regressions of tumor xenografts, while each drug alone had no effect.

SIGNIFICANCE

As increased generation of ROS is a universal feature of tumors, our findings may open new routes to broaden the therapeutic potential of ATR inhibitors.

BRCA2 promotes genomic integrity and therapy resistance primarily through its role in homology-directed repair

Highlights

Gap suppression requires BRCA2 C-terminal RAD51 binding in mouse and human cells Brca2 heterozygosity in mice results in fork protection and gap suppression defects Gap suppression mitigates sensitivity to hmdU, but only when HDR is unperturbedHDR deficiency is the primary driver of chemotherapeutic sensitivity.

eTOC blurb

Lim et al . report that gap suppression as well as fork protection require BRCA2 stabilization of RAD51 filaments in human and mouse cells but have minimal impact on genome integrity, oncogenesis, and drug resistance. BRCA2 suppression of PRIMPOL-mediated replication gaps confers resistance to the nucleotide hmdU, incorporation of which leads to cytotoxic abasic sites.This effect is diminished when HDR is abrogated.

Summary

Tumor suppressor BRCA2 functions in homology-directed repair (HDR), protection of stalled replication forks, and suppression of replicative gaps. The relative contributions of these pathways to genome integrity and chemotherapy response are under scrutiny. Here, we report that mouse and human cells require a RAD51 filament stabilization motif in BRCA2 for both fork protection and gap suppression, but not HDR. Loss of fork protection and gap suppression do not compromise genome instability or shorten tumor latency in mice or cause replication stress in human mammary cells. By contrast, HDR deficiency increases spontaneous and replication stress-induced chromosome aberrations and tumor predisposition. Unlike with HDR, fork protection and gap suppression defects are also observed in Brca2 heterozygous mouse cells, likely due to reduced RAD51 stabilization at stalled forks and gaps. Gaps arise from PRIMPOL activity, which is associated with sensitivity to 5-hydroxymethyl-2’-deoxyuridine due to the formation of abasic sites by SMUG1 glycosylase and is exacerbated by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. However, HDR deficiency ultimately modulates sensitivity to chemotherapeutics, including PARP inhibitors.

RTEL1 and MCM10 overcome topological stress during vertebrate replication termination

Topological stress can cause converging replication forks to stall during termination of vertebrate DNA synthesis. However, replication forks ultimately overcome fork stalling, suggesting that alternative mechanisms of termination exist. Using proteomics in Xenopus egg extracts, we show that the helicase RTEL1 and the replisome protein MCM10 are highly enriched on chromatin during fork convergence and are crucially important for fork convergence under conditions of topological stress. RTEL1 and MCM10 cooperate to promote fork convergence and do not impact topoisomerase activity but do promote fork progression through a replication barrier. Thus, RTEL1 and MCM10 play a general role in promoting progression of stalled forks, including when forks stall during termination. Our data reveal an alternate mechanism of termination involving RTEL1 and MCM10 that can be used to complete DNA synthesis under conditions of topological stress.