1
|
Brighi C, Puttick S, Woods A, Keall P, Tooney PA, Waddington DEJ, Sproule V, Rose S, Fay M. Comparison between [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and [ 18F]FET PET as Imaging Biomarkers in Adult Recurrent Glioblastoma. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:16208. [PMID: 38003399 PMCID: PMC10671181 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242216208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the potential of the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting ligand, [68Ga]-PSMA-Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-2-naphthyl-L-Ala-cyclohexane-DOTA ([68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617) as a positron emission tomography (PET) imaging biomarker in recurrent glioblastoma patients. Patients underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([18F]FET) PET scans on two separate days. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 tumour selectivity was assessed by comparing tumour volume delineation and by assessing the intra-patient correlation between tumour uptake on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and [18F]FET PET images. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 tumour specificity was evaluated by comparing its tumour-to-brain ratio (TBR) with [18F]FET TBR and its tumour volume with the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast-enhancing (CE) tumour volume. Ten patients were recruited in this study. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617-avid tumour volume was larger than the [18F]FET tumour volume (p = 0.063). There was a positive intra-patient correlation (median Pearson r = 0.51; p < 0.0001) between [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and [18F]FET in the tumour volume. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 had significantly higher TBR (p = 0.002) than [18F]FET. The [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617-avid tumour volume was larger than the CE tumour volume (p = 0.0039). Overall, accumulation of [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-617 beyond [18F]FET-avid tumour regions suggests the presence of neoangiogenesis in tumour regions that are not overly metabolically active yet. Higher tumour specificity suggests that [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-617 could be a better imaging biomarker for recurrent tumour delineation and secondary treatment planning than [18F]FET and CE MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Brighi
- Image X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2015, Australia; (P.K.); (D.E.J.W.)
| | - Simon Puttick
- AdvanCell Isotopes Pty Ltd., Sydney 2000, Australia; (S.P.); (S.R.)
| | - Amanda Woods
- GenesisCare, Newcastle 2290, Australia; (A.W.); (V.S.); (M.F.)
| | - Paul Keall
- Image X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2015, Australia; (P.K.); (D.E.J.W.)
| | - Paul A. Tooney
- MHF Centre for Brain Cancer Research, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle 2308, Australia;
| | - David E. J. Waddington
- Image X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2015, Australia; (P.K.); (D.E.J.W.)
| | - Vicki Sproule
- GenesisCare, Newcastle 2290, Australia; (A.W.); (V.S.); (M.F.)
| | - Stephen Rose
- AdvanCell Isotopes Pty Ltd., Sydney 2000, Australia; (S.P.); (S.R.)
| | - Michael Fay
- GenesisCare, Newcastle 2290, Australia; (A.W.); (V.S.); (M.F.)
- MHF Centre for Brain Cancer Research, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle 2308, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rahimpour M, Boellaard R, Jentjens S, Deckers W, Goffin K, Koole M. A multi-label CNN model for the automatic detection and segmentation of gliomas using [ 18F]FET PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:2441-2452. [PMID: 36933075 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06193-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for the automatic detection and segmentation of gliomas using [18F]fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine ([18F]FET) PET. METHODS Ninety-three patients (84 in-house/7 external) who underwent a 20-40-min static [18F]FET PET scan were retrospectively included. Lesions and background regions were defined by two nuclear medicine physicians using the MIM software, such that delineations by one expert reader served as ground truth for training and testing the CNN model, while delineations by the second expert reader were used to evaluate inter-reader agreement. A multi-label CNN was developed to segment the lesion and background region while a single-label CNN was implemented for a lesion-only segmentation. Lesion detectability was evaluated by classifying [18F]FET PET scans as negative when no tumor was segmented and vice versa, while segmentation performance was assessed using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and segmented tumor volume. The quantitative accuracy was evaluated using the maximal and mean tumor to mean background uptake ratio (TBRmax/TBRmean). CNN models were trained and tested by a threefold cross-validation (CV) using the in-house data, while the external data was used for an independent evaluation to assess the generalizability of the two CNN models. RESULTS Based on the threefold CV, the multi-label CNN model achieved 88.9% sensitivity and 96.5% precision for discriminating between positive and negative [18F]FET PET scans compared to a 35.3% sensitivity and 83.1% precision obtained with the single-label CNN model. In addition, the multi-label CNN allowed an accurate estimation of the maximal/mean lesion and mean background uptake, resulting in an accurate TBRmax/TBRmean estimation compared to a semi-automatic approach. In terms of lesion segmentation, the multi-label CNN model (DSC = 74.6 ± 23.1%) demonstrated equal performance as the single-label CNN model (DSC = 73.7 ± 23.2%) with tumor volumes estimated by the single-label and multi-label model (22.9 ± 23.6 ml and 23.1 ± 24.3 ml, respectively) closely approximating the tumor volumes estimated by the expert reader (24.1 ± 24.4 ml). DSCs of both CNN models were in line with the DSCs by the second expert reader compared with the lesion segmentations by the first expert reader, while detection and segmentation performance of both CNN models as determined with the in-house data were confirmed by the independent evaluation using external data. CONCLUSION The proposed multi-label CNN model detected positive [18F]FET PET scans with high sensitivity and precision. Once detected, an accurate tumor segmentation and estimation of background activity was achieved resulting in an automatic and accurate TBRmax/TBRmean estimation, such that user interaction and potential inter-reader variability can be minimized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masoomeh Rahimpour
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, UZ, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 - Box 7003, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Wies Deckers
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karolien Goffin
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, UZ, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 - Box 7003, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michel Koole
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, UZ, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 - Box 7003, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rajagopal A, Natsuaki Y, Wangerin K, Hamdi M, An H, Sunderland JJ, Laforest R, Kinahan PE, Larson PEZ, Hope TA. Synthetic PET via Domain Translation of 3-D MRI. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES 2023; 7:333-343. [PMID: 37396797 PMCID: PMC10311993 DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2022.3223275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
Historically, patient datasets have been used to develop and validate various reconstruction algorithms for PET/MRI and PET/CT. To enable such algorithm development, without the need for acquiring hundreds of patient exams, in this article we demonstrate a deep learning technique to generate synthetic but realistic whole-body PET sinograms from abundantly available whole-body MRI. Specifically, we use a dataset of 56 18F-FDG-PET/MRI exams to train a 3-D residual UNet to predict physiologic PET uptake from whole-body T1-weighted MRI. In training, we implemented a balanced loss function to generate realistic uptake across a large dynamic range and computed losses along tomographic lines of response to mimic the PET acquisition. The predicted PET images are forward projected to produce synthetic PET (sPET) time-of-flight (ToF) sinograms that can be used with vendor-provided PET reconstruction algorithms, including using CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC) and MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC). The resulting synthetic data recapitulates physiologic 18F-FDG uptake, e.g., high uptake localized to the brain and bladder, as well as uptake in liver, kidneys, heart, and muscle. To simulate abnormalities with high uptake, we also insert synthetic lesions. We demonstrate that this sPET data can be used interchangeably with real PET data for the PET quantification task of comparing CTAC and MRAC methods, achieving ≤ 7.6% error in mean-SUV compared to using real data. These results together show that the proposed sPET data pipeline can be reasonably used for development, evaluation, and validation of PET/MRI reconstruction methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhejit Rajagopal
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
| | - Yutaka Natsuaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
| | | | - Mahdjoub Hamdi
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA
| | - Hongyu An
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA
| | - John J Sunderland
- Department of Radiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
| | - Richard Laforest
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA
| | - Paul E Kinahan
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Peder E Z Larson
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Waltenberger M, Furkel J, Röhrich M, Salome P, Debus C, Tawk B, Gahlawat AW, Kudak A, Dostal M, Wirkner U, Schwager C, Herold-Mende C, Combs SE, König L, Debus J, Haberkorn U, Abdollahi A, Knoll M. The impact of tumor metabolic activity assessed by 18F-FET amino acid PET imaging in particle radiotherapy of high-grade glioma patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:901390. [PMID: 36203443 PMCID: PMC9531169 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.901390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Selective uptake of (18)F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine (18F-FET) is used in high-grade glioma (HGG) to assess tumor metabolic activity via positron emission tomography (PET). We aim to investigate its value for target volume definition, as a prognosticator, and associations with whole-blood transcriptome liquid biopsy (WBT lbx) for which we recently reported feasibility to mirror tumor characteristics and response to particle irradiation in recurrent HGG (rHGG). Methods 18F-FET-PET data from n = 43 patients with primary glioblastoma (pGBM) and n = 33 patients with rHGG were assessed. pGBM patients were irradiated with photons and sequential proton/carbon boost, and rHGG patients were treated with carbon re-irradiation (CIR). WBT (Illumina HumanHT-12 Expression BeadChips) lbx was available for n = 9 patients from the rHGG cohort. PET isocontours (40%–70% SUVmax, 10% steps) and MRI-based treatment volumes (MRIvol) were compared using the conformity index (CI) (pGBM, n = 16; rHGG, n = 27). Associations with WBT lbx data were tested on gene expression level and inferred pathways activity scores (PROGENy) and from transcriptome estimated cell fractions (CIBERSORT, xCell). Results In pGBM, median SUVmax was higher in PET acquired pre-radiotherapy (4.1, range (R) 1.5–7.8; n = 20) vs. during radiotherapy (3.3, R 1.5–5.7, n = 23; p = 0.03) and in non-resected (4.7, R 2.9–7.9; n = 11) vs. resected tumors (3.3, R 1.5–7.8, n = 32; p = 0.01). In rHGG, a trend toward higher SUVmax values in grade IV tumors was observed (p = 0.13). Median MRIvol was 32.34 (R 8.75–108.77) cm3 in pGBM (n = 16) and 20.77 (R 0.63–128.44) cm3 in rHGG patients (n = 27). The highest median CI was observed for 40% (pGBM, 0.31) and 50% (rHGG, 0.43, all tumors) isodose, with 70% (40%) isodose in grade III (IV) rHGG tumors (median CI, 0.38 and 0.49). High SUVmax was linked to shorter survival in pGBM (>3.3, p = 0.001, OR 6.0 [2.1–17.4]) and rHGG (>2.8, p = 0.02, OR 4.1 [1.2–13.9]). SUVmax showed associations with inferred monocyte fractions, hypoxia, and TGFbeta pathway activity and links to immune checkpoint gene expression from WBT lbx. Conclusion The benefits of 18F-FET-PET imaging on gross tumor volume (GTV) definition for particle radiotherapy warrant further evaluation. SUVmax might assist in prognostic stratification of HGG patients for particle radiotherapy, highlights heterogeneity in rHGG, and is positively associated with unfavorable signatures in peripheral whole-blood transcriptomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Waltenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Jennifer Furkel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Röhrich
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Salome
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Charlotte Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Steinbuch Centre for Computing (SCC), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
| | - Bouchra Tawk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aoife Ward Gahlawat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Kudak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Dostal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ute Wirkner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Schwager
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christel Herold-Mende
- Department of Experimental Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uwe Haberkorn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Knoll
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Maximilian Knoll,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Relapsing High—Grade Glioma from Peritumoral Zone: Critical Review of Radiotherapy Treatment Options. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12040416. [PMID: 35447948 PMCID: PMC9027370 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12040416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive brain tumor in adults, with a median survival of about 15 months. After the prior treatment, GBM tends to relapse within the high dose radiation field, defined as the peritumoral brain zone (PTZ), needing a second treatment. In the present review, the primary role of ionizing radiation in recurrent GBM is discussed, and the current literature knowledge about the different radiation modalities, doses and fractionation options at our disposal is summarized. Therefore, the focus is on the necessity of tailoring the treatment approach to every single patient and using radiomics and PET/MRI imaging to have a relatively good outcome and avoid severe toxicity. The use of charged particle therapy and radiosensitizers to overcome GBM radioresistance is considered, even if further studies are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness in the setting of reirradiation.
Collapse
|
6
|
Whole Blood Transcriptional Fingerprints of High-Grade Glioma and Longitudinal Tumor Evolution under Carbon Ion Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030684. [PMID: 35158950 PMCID: PMC8833402 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Particle therapy with carbon ions is a promising novel option for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG). Lack of initial and sequential biopsies limits the investigation of rHGG evolution under therapy. We hypothesized that peripheral blood transcriptome derived from liquid biopsies (lbx) as a minimal invasive method may provide a useful decision support for identification of glioma grade and provide novel means for longitudinal molecular monitoring of tumor evolution under carbon ion irradiation (CIR). We demonstrate feasibility and report patient, tumor and treatment fingerprints in whole blood transcriptomes of rHGG patients with pre-CIR and three post-CIR time points. Abstract Purpose: To assess the value of whole blood transcriptome data from liquid biopsy (lbx) in recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG) patients for longitudinal molecular monitoring of tumor evolution under carbon ion irradiation (CIR). Methods: Whole blood transcriptome (WBT) analysis (Illumina HumanHT-12 Expression BeadChips) was performed in 14 patients with rHGG pre re-irradiation (reRT) with CIR and 3, 6 and 9 weeks post-CIR (reRT grade III:5, 36%, IV:9, 64%). Patients were irradiated with 30, 33, 36 GyRBE (n = 5, 6, 3) in 3GyRBE per fraction. Results: WTB analysis showed stable correlation with treatment characteristics and patients tumor grade, indicating a preserved tumor origin specific as well as dynamic transcriptional fingerprints of peripheral blood cells. Initial histopathologic tumor grade was indirectly associated with TMEM173 (STING), DNA-repair (ATM, POLD4) and hypoxia related genes. DNA-repair, chromatin remodeling (LIG1, SMARCD1) and immune response (FLT3LG) pathways were affected post-CIR. Longitudinal WTB fingerprints identified two distinct trajectories of rHGG evolution, characterized by differential and prognostic CRISPLD2 expression pre-CIR. Conclusions: Lbx based WTB analysis holds the potential for molecular stratification of rHGG patients and therapy monitoring. We demonstrate the feasibility of the peripheral blood transcriptome as a sentinel organ for identification of patient, tumor characteristics and CIR specific fingerprints in rHGG.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ort J, Hamou HA, Kernbach JM, Hakvoort K, Blume C, Lohmann P, Galldiks N, Heiland DH, Mottaghy FM, Clusmann H, Neuloh G, Langen KJ, Delev D. 18F-FET-PET-guided gross total resection improves overall survival in patients with WHO grade III/IV glioma: moving towards a multimodal imaging-guided resection. J Neurooncol 2021; 155:71-80. [PMID: 34599479 PMCID: PMC8545732 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03844-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Purpose PET using radiolabeled amino acid [18F]-fluoro-ethyl-L-tyrosine (FET-PET) is a well-established imaging modality for glioma diagnostics. The biological tumor volume (BTV) as depicted by FET-PET often differs in volume and location from tumor volume of contrast enhancement (CE) in MRI. Our aim was to investigate whether a gross total resection of BTVs defined as < 1 cm3 of residual BTV (PET GTR) correlates with better oncological outcome. Methods We retrospectively analyzed imaging and survival data from patients with primary and recurrent WHO grade III or IV gliomas who underwent FET-PET before surgical resection. Tumor overlap between FET-PET and CE was evaluated. Completeness of FET-PET resection (PET GTR) was calculated after superimposition and semi-automated segmentation of pre-operative FET-PET and postoperative MRI imaging. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test. Results From 30 included patients, PET GTR was achieved in 20 patients. Patients with PET GTR showed improved median OS with 19.3 compared to 13.7 months for patients with residual FET uptake (p = 0.007; HR 0.3; 95% CI 0.12–0.76). This finding remained as independent prognostic factor after performing multivariate analysis (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06–0.62, p = 0.006). Other survival influencing factors such as age, IDH-mutation, MGMT promotor status, and adjuvant treatment modalities were equally distributed between both groups. Conclusion Our results suggest that PET GTR improves the OS in patients with WHO grade III or IV gliomas. A multimodal imaging approach including FET-PET for surgical planning in newly diagnosed and recurrent tumors may improve the oncological outcome in glioma patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-021-03844-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Ort
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany. .,NAILA-Neurosurgical Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Aachen, Aachen, Germany. .,Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Aachen, Germany.
| | - Hussam Aldin Hamou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Aachen, Germany
| | - Julius M Kernbach
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany.,NAILA-Neurosurgical Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Aachen, Aachen, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Aachen, Germany
| | - Karlijn Hakvoort
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany.,NAILA-Neurosurgical Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Aachen, Aachen, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Aachen, Germany
| | - Christian Blume
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Aachen, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Aachen, Germany
| | - Dieter Henrik Heiland
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg University, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Felix M Mottaghy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany.,JARA-Juelich Aachen Research Alliance, Juelich, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Aachen, Germany
| | - Hans Clusmann
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Aachen, Germany
| | - Georg Neuloh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Aachen, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany.,JARA-Juelich Aachen Research Alliance, Juelich, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Aachen, Germany
| | - Daniel Delev
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany.,NAILA-Neurosurgical Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Aachen, Aachen, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Riva G, Imparato S, Savietto G, Pecorilla M, Iannalfi A, Barcellini A, Ronchi S, Fiore MR, Paganelli C, Buizza G, Ciocca M, Baroni G, Preda L, Orlandi E. Potential role of functional imaging in predicting outcome for patients treated with carbon ion therapy: a review. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20210524. [PMID: 34520670 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) is an emerging radiation technique with advantageous physical and radiobiologic properties compared to conventional radiotherapy (RT) providing better response in case of radioresistant and hypoxic tumors. Our aim is to critically review if functional imaging techniques could play a role in predicting outcome of CIRT-treated tumors, as already proven for conventional RT. METHODS 14 studies, concerning Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET), were selected after a comprehensive search on multiple electronic databases from January 2000 to March 2020. RESULTS MRI studies (n = 5) focused on diffusion-weighted MRI and, even though quantitative parameters were the same in all studies (apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC), results were not univocal, probably due to different imaging acquisition protocols and tumoral histology. For PET studies (n = 9), different tracers were used such as [18F]FDG and other uncommon tracers ([11C]MET, [18F]FLT), with a relevant heterogeneity regarding parameters used for outcome assessment. CONCLUSION No conclusion can be drawn on the predictive value of functional imaging in CIRT-treated tumors. A standardization of image acquisition, multi-institutional large trials and external validations are needed in order to establish the prognostic value of functional imaging in CIRT and to guide clinical practice. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Emerging studies focused on functional imaging's role in predicting CIRT outcome. Due to the heterogeneity of images acquisition and studies, results are conflicting and prospective large studies with imaging standardized protocol are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Riva
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Sara Imparato
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Savietto
- Unit of Radiology, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Mattia Pecorilla
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Alberto Iannalfi
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Amelia Barcellini
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Sara Ronchi
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Rosaria Fiore
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering (DEIB), Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Giulia Buizza
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering (DEIB), Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Mario Ciocca
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Guido Baroni
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering (DEIB), Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Preda
- Unit of Radiology, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.,Department of Radiology, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tang Z, Dokic I, Knoll M, Ciamarone F, Schwager C, Klein C, Cebulla G, Hoffmann DC, Schlegel J, Seidel P, Rutenberg C, Brons S, Herold-Mende C, Wick W, Debus J, Lemke D, Abdollahi A. Radioresistance and Transcriptional Reprograming of Invasive Glioblastoma Cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:499-513. [PMID: 34534627 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Infiltrative growth pattern is a hallmark of glioblastoma (GBM). Radiation therapy aims to eradicate microscopic residual GBM cells after surgical removal of the visible tumor bulk. However, in-field recurrences remain the major pattern of therapy failure. We hypothesized that the radiosensitivity of peripheral invasive tumor cells (peri) may differ from the predominantly investigated tumor bulk. METHODS AND MATERIALS Invasive GBM populations were generated via debulking of the visible tumor core and serial orthotopic transplantation of peri cells, and sustained proinvasive phenotype of peri cells was confirmed in vitro by scratch assay and time lapse imaging. In parallel, invasive GBM cells were selected by transwell assay and from peri cells of patient-derived 3-dimensional spheroid cultures. Transcriptome analysis deciphered a GBM invasion-associated gene signature, and functional involvement of key pathways was validated by pharmacologic inhibition. RESULTS Compared with the bulk cells, invasive GBM populations acquired a radioresistant phenotype characterized by increased cell survival, reduced cell apoptosis, and enhanced DNA double-strand break repair proficiency. Transcriptome analysis revealed a reprograming of invasive cells toward augmented activation of epidermal growth factor receptor- and nuclear factor-κB-related pathways, whereas metabolic processes were downregulated. An invasive GBM score derived from this transcriptional fingerprint correlated well with patient outcome. Inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor and nuclear factor-κB signaling resensitized invasive cells to irradiation. Invasive cells were eradicated with similar efficacy by particle therapy with carbon ions. CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that invasive tumor cells constitute a phenotypically distinct and highly radioresistant GBM subpopulation with prognostic impact that may be vulnerable to targeted therapy and carbon ions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zili Tang
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ivana Dokic
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Knoll
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Federica Ciamarone
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Schwager
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carmen Klein
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gina Cebulla
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dirk C Hoffmann
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julian Schlegel
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Seidel
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christiane Rutenberg
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christel Herold-Mende
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dieter Lemke
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Moon H, Byun BH, Lim I, Kim BI, Choi CW, Rhee CH, Lee KC, Woo SK, Park C, Kil HS, Chi DY, Youn SM, Lim SM. A Phase 0 Microdosing PET/CT Study Using O-[18F]Fluoromethyl-d-Tyrosine in Normal Human Brain and Brain Tumor. Clin Nucl Med 2021; 46:717-722. [PMID: 34034333 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000003735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the present study was to obtain information about distribution, radiation dosimetry, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of O-[18F]fluoromethyl-d-tyrosine (d-18F-FMT), an amino acid PET tracer, in patients with brain tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 6 healthy controls (age = 19-25 years, 3 males and 3 females) with brain PET images and radiation dosimetry and 12 patients (median age = 60 years, 6 males and 6 females) with primary (n = 5) or metastatic brain tumor (n = 7) were enrolled. We acquired 60-minute dynamic brain PET images after injecting 370 MBq of d-18F-FMT. Time-activity curves of d-18F-FMT uptake in normal brain versus brain tumors and tumor-to-background ratio were analyzed for each PET data set. RESULTS Normal cerebral uptake of d-18F-FMT decreased from 0 to 5 minutes after injection, but gradually increased from 10 to 60 minutes. Tumoral uptake of d-18F-FMT reached a peak before 30 minutes. Tumor-to-background ratio peaked at less than 15 minutes for 8 patients and more than 15 minutes for 4 patients. The mean effective dose was calculated to be 13.2 μSv/MBq. CONCLUSIONS Using d-18F-FMT as a PET radiotracer is safe. It can distinguish brain tumor from surrounding normal brain tissues with a high contrast. Early-time PET images of brain tumors should be acquired because the tumor-to-background ratio tended to reach a peak within 15 minutes after injection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kyo Chul Lee
- Division of RI Convergence, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences
| | - Sang-Keun Woo
- Division of RI Convergence, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Optimisation of CT scan parameters to increase the accuracy of gross tumour volume identification in brain radiotherapy. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396920000436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractAim:This study aimed to optimise computed tomography (CT) simulation scan parameters to increase the accuracy for gross tumour volume identification in brain radiotherapy. For this purpose, high-contrast scan protocols were assessed.Materials and methods:A CT accreditation phantom (ACR Gammex 464) was used to optimise brain CT scan parameters on a Toshiba Alexion 16-row multislice CT scanner. Dose, tube voltage, tube current–time and CT dose index (CTDI) were varied to create five image quality enhancement (IQE) protocols. They were assessed in terms of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and noise level and compared with a standard clinical protocol. Finally, the ability of the selected protocols to identify low-contrast objects was examined based on a subjective method.Results:Among the five IQE protocols, the one with the highest tube current–time product (250 mA) and lowest tube voltage (100 kVp) showed higher CNR, while another with a tube current–time product of 150 mA and a tube voltage of 135 kVp had improved SNR and lower noise level compared to the standard protocol. In contouring low-contrast objects, the protocol with the highest milliampere and lowest peak kilovoltage exhibited the lowest error rate (1%) compared to the standard protocol (25%).Findings:CT image quality should be optimised using the high-dose parameters created in this study to provide better soft tissue contrast. This could lead to an accurate identification of gross tumour volume recognition in the planning of radiotherapy treatment.
Collapse
|
12
|
Galldiks N, Niyazi M, Grosu AL, Kocher M, Langen KJ, Law I, Minniti G, Kim MM, Tsien C, Dhermain F, Soffietti R, Mehta MP, Weller M, Tonn JC. Contribution of PET imaging to radiotherapy planning and monitoring in glioma patients - a report of the PET/RANO group. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:881-893. [PMID: 33538838 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of patients with glioma usually requires multimodality treatment including surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy. Accurate neuroimaging plays a central role for radiotherapy planning and follow-up after radiotherapy completion. In order to maximize the radiation dose to the tumor and to minimize toxic effects on the surrounding brain parenchyma, reliable identification of tumor extent and target volume delineation is crucial. The use of positron emission tomography (PET) for radiotherapy planning and monitoring in gliomas has gained considerable interest over the last several years, but Class I data are not yet available. Furthermore, PET has been used after radiotherapy for response assessment and to distinguish tumor progression from pseudoprogression or radiation necrosis. Here, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group provides a summary of the literature and recommendations for the use of PET imaging for radiotherapy of patients with glioma based on published studies, constituting levels 1-3 evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, Cologne and Aachen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, Cologne and Aachen, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.,IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Christina Tsien
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Frederic Dhermain
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut de Cancerologie Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA.,Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jörg-Christian Tonn
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Robinson ER, Gowrishankar G, D'Souza AL, Kheirolomoom A, Haywood T, Hori SS, Chuang HY, Zeng Y, Tumbale SK, Aalipour A, Beinat C, Alam IS, Sathirachinda A, Kanada M, Paulmurugan R, Ferrara KW, Gambhir SS. Minicircles for a two-step blood biomarker and PET imaging early cancer detection strategy. J Control Release 2021; 335:281-289. [PMID: 34029631 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Early cancer detection can dramatically increase treatment options and survival rates for patients, yet detection of early-stage tumors remains difficult. Here, we demonstrate a two-step strategy to detect and locate cancerous lesions by delivering tumor-activatable minicircle (MC) plasmids encoding a combination of blood-based and imaging reporter genes to tumor cells. We genetically engineered the MCs, under the control of the pan-tumor-specific Survivin promoter, to encode: 1) Gaussia Luciferase (GLuc), a secreted biomarker that can be easily assayed in blood samples; and 2) Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Thymidine Kinase mutant (HSV-1 sr39TK), a PET reporter gene that can be used for highly sensitive and quantitative imaging of the tumor location. We evaluated two methods of MC delivery, complexing the MCs with the chemical transfection reagent jetPEI or encapsulating the MCs in extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from a human cervical cancer HeLa cell line. MCs delivered by EVs or jetPEI yielded significant expression of the reporter genes in cell culture versus MCs delivered without a transfection reagent. Secreted GLuc correlated with HSV-1 sr39TK expression with R2 = 0.9676. MC complexation with jetPEI delivered a larger mass of MC for enhanced transfection, which was crucial for in vivo animal studies, where delivery of MCs via jetPEI resulted in GLuc and HSV-1 sr39TK expression at significantly higher levels than controls. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the PET reporter gene HSV-1 sr39TK delivered via a tumor-activatable MC to tumor cells for an early cancer detection strategy. This work explores solutions to endogenous blood-based biomarker and molecular imaging limitations of early cancer detection strategies and elucidates the delivery capabilities and limitations of EVs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise R Robinson
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Gayatri Gowrishankar
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Aloma L D'Souza
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Azadeh Kheirolomoom
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Tom Haywood
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Sharon S Hori
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Hui-Yen Chuang
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yitian Zeng
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Spencer K Tumbale
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Amin Aalipour
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Corinne Beinat
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Israt S Alam
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Ataya Sathirachinda
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Masamitsu Kanada
- Institute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering (IQ), Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824., USA
| | - Ramasamy Paulmurugan
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Katherine W Ferrara
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| | - Sanjiv S Gambhir
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ferjančič P, Ebert MA, Francis R, Nowak AK, Jeraj R. Repeatability of Quantitative 18F-FET PET in Glioblastoma. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2021; 7. [PMID: 33887712 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/abfae9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET), a PET radiotracer of amino acid uptake, has shown potential for diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). To improve quantitative assessment of FET PET imaging, we evaluated the repeatability of uptake of this tracer in patients with GBM.Methods: Test-retest FET PET imaging was performed on 8 patients with histologically confirmed GBM, who previously underwent surgical resection of the tumour. Data were acquired according to the protocol of a prospective clinical trial validating FET PET as a clinical tool in GBM. SUVmean, SUVmaxand SUV98%metrics were extracted for both test and retest images and used to calculate 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA) on lesion-level, as well as on volumes of varying sizes. Impact of healthy brain normalization on repeatability of lesion SUV metrics was evaluated.Results: Tumour LoA were [0.72, 1.46] for SUVmeanand SUVtotal, [0.79,1.23] for SUVmax, and [0.80,1.18] for SUV98%. Healthy brain LoA were [0.80,1.25] for SUVmean, [0.80,1.25] for SUVmax, and [0.81,1.23] for SUV98%. Voxel-level SUV LoA were [0.76, 1.32] for tumour volumes and [0.80, 1.25] for healthy brain. When sampled over maximum volume, SUV LoA were [0.90,1.12] for tumour and [0.92,1.08] for healthy brain. Normalization of uptake using healthy brain volumes was found to improve repeatability, but not after normalization volume size of about 15 cm3.Conclusions Advances in Knowledge and Implications for Patient Care: Repeatability of FET PET is comparable to existing tracers such as FDG and FLT. Healthy brain uptake is slightly more repeatable than uptake of tumour volumes. Repeatability was found to increase with sampled volume. SUV normalization between scans using healthy brain uptake should be performed using volumes at least 15 cm3in size to ensure best imaging repeatability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Ferjančič
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - Martin A Ebert
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.,Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.,5D Clinics, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Roslyn Francis
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.,Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Anna K Nowak
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.,Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Robert Jeraj
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.,Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Marcus D, Lieverse RIY, Klein C, Abdollahi A, Lambin P, Dubois LJ, Yaromina A. Charged Particle and Conventional Radiotherapy: Current Implications as Partner for Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1468. [PMID: 33806808 PMCID: PMC8005048 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to interfere with inflammatory signals and to enhance tumor immunogenicity via, e.g., immunogenic cell death, thereby potentially augmenting the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy. Conventional RT consists predominantly of high energy photon beams. Hypofractionated RT regimens administered, e.g., by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), are increasingly investigated in combination with cancer immunotherapy within clinical trials. Despite intensive preclinical studies, the optimal dose per fraction and dose schemes for elaboration of RT induced immunogenic potential remain inconclusive. Compared to the scenario of combined immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and RT, multimodal therapies utilizing other immunotherapy principles such as adoptive transfer of immune cells, vaccination strategies, targeted immune-cytokines and agonists are underrepresented in both preclinical and clinical settings. Despite the clinical success of ICI and RT combination, e.g., prolonging overall survival in locally advanced lung cancer, curative outcomes are still not achieved for most cancer entities studied. Charged particle RT (PRT) has gained interest as it may enhance tumor immunogenicity compared to conventional RT due to its unique biological and physical properties. However, whether PRT in combination with immune therapy will elicit superior antitumor effects both locally and systemically needs to be further investigated. In this review, the immunological effects of RT in the tumor microenvironment are summarized to understand their implications for immunotherapy combinations. Attention will be given to the various immunotherapeutic interventions that have been co-administered with RT so far. Furthermore, the theoretical basis and first evidences supporting a favorable immunogenicity profile of PRT will be examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damiënne Marcus
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW–School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (D.M.); (R.I.Y.L.); (P.L.); (L.J.D.)
| | - Relinde I. Y. Lieverse
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW–School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (D.M.); (R.I.Y.L.); (P.L.); (L.J.D.)
| | - Carmen Klein
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (C.K.); (A.A.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 222, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (C.K.); (A.A.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 222, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philippe Lambin
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW–School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (D.M.); (R.I.Y.L.); (P.L.); (L.J.D.)
| | - Ludwig J. Dubois
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW–School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (D.M.); (R.I.Y.L.); (P.L.); (L.J.D.)
| | - Ala Yaromina
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW–School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (D.M.); (R.I.Y.L.); (P.L.); (L.J.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schnabel E, Knoll M, Schwager C, Warta R, Mock A, Campos B, König L, Jungk C, Wick W, Unterberg A, Debus J, Herold-Mende C, Abdollahi A. Prognostic Value of microRNA-221/2 and 17-92 Families in Primary Glioblastoma Patients Treated with Postoperative Radiotherapy. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22062960. [PMID: 33803955 PMCID: PMC7998975 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22062960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRs) are non-coding master regulators of transcriptome that could act as tumor suppressors (TSs) or oncogenes (oncomiRs). We aimed to systematically investigate the relevance of miRs as prognostic biomarkers in primary glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) treated with postoperative radio(chemo)therapy (PORT). For hypothesis generation, tumor miR expression by Agilent 8x15K human microRNA microarrays and survival data from 482 GBM patients of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA cohort) were analyzed using Cox-PH models. Expression of candidate miRs with prognostic relevance (miR-221/222; miR-17-5p, miR-18a, miR-19b) was validated by qRT-PCR using Taqman technology on an independent validation cohort of GBM patients (n = 109) treated at Heidelberg University Hospital (HD cohort). In TCGA, 50 miRs showed significant association with survival. Among the top ranked prognostic miRs were members of the two miR families miR-221/222 and miR-17-92. Loss of miR-221/222 was correlated with improved prognosis in both cohorts (TCGA, HD) and was an independent prognostic marker in a multivariate analysis considering demographic characteristics (age, sex, Karnofsky performance index (KPI)), molecular markers (O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation, IDH mutation status) and PORT as co-variables. The prognostic value of miR-17-92 family members was ambiguous and in part contradictory by direct comparison of the two cohorts, thus warranting further validation in larger prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Schnabel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.S.); (M.K.); (C.S.); (A.M.); (L.K.); (J.D.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Divisions of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), DKFZ and UKHD, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), DKFZ and UKHD, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Child and Adolescent Medicine, General Pediatrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Knoll
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.S.); (M.K.); (C.S.); (A.M.); (L.K.); (J.D.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Divisions of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), DKFZ and UKHD, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), DKFZ and UKHD, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Schwager
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.S.); (M.K.); (C.S.); (A.M.); (L.K.); (J.D.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Divisions of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), DKFZ and UKHD, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), DKFZ and UKHD, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rolf Warta
- Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (R.W.); (B.C.); (C.J.); (A.U.); (C.H.-M.)
| | - Andreas Mock
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.S.); (M.K.); (C.S.); (A.M.); (L.K.); (J.D.)
- Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (R.W.); (B.C.); (C.J.); (A.U.); (C.H.-M.)
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Department of Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benito Campos
- Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (R.W.); (B.C.); (C.J.); (A.U.); (C.H.-M.)
| | - Laila König
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.S.); (M.K.); (C.S.); (A.M.); (L.K.); (J.D.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Divisions of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), DKFZ and UKHD, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), DKFZ and UKHD, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Jungk
- Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (R.W.); (B.C.); (C.J.); (A.U.); (C.H.-M.)
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Andreas Unterberg
- Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (R.W.); (B.C.); (C.J.); (A.U.); (C.H.-M.)
| | - Jürgen Debus
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.S.); (M.K.); (C.S.); (A.M.); (L.K.); (J.D.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Divisions of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), DKFZ and UKHD, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), DKFZ and UKHD, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christel Herold-Mende
- Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (R.W.); (B.C.); (C.J.); (A.U.); (C.H.-M.)
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.S.); (M.K.); (C.S.); (A.M.); (L.K.); (J.D.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Divisions of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), DKFZ and UKHD, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), DKFZ and UKHD, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gutsche R, Scheins J, Kocher M, Bousabarah K, Fink GR, Shah NJ, Langen KJ, Galldiks N, Lohmann P. Evaluation of FET PET Radiomics Feature Repeatability in Glioma Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040647. [PMID: 33562803 PMCID: PMC7915742 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Initial studies suggested the additional diagnostic value of amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) radiomics using the tracer O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) in brain tumor patient management. However, to ensure the reliable performance of the generated FET PET radiomics models for clinical diagnostics, repeatability of radiomics features is essential. Hence, we assessed the impact of brain tumor volumes and key molecular alterations such as an isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation on the repeatability of FET PET radiomics features in 50 newly diagnosed glioma patients. In a test–retest approach based on routinely acquired FET PET scans, we identified 297 repeatable features. The IDH genotype did not affect feature repeatability. Moreover, these robust features were able to differentiate patients with IDH-wildtype glioma from those with an IDH mutation. Our results suggest that robust radiomics features can be obtained from routinely acquired FET PET scans, which are valuable for further standardization of radiomics analyses in neurooncology. Abstract Amino acid PET using the tracer O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) has attracted considerable interest in neurooncology. Furthermore, initial studies suggested the additional diagnostic value of FET PET radiomics in brain tumor patient management. However, the conclusiveness of radiomics models strongly depends on feature generalizability. We here evaluated the repeatability of feature-based FET PET radiomics. A test–retest analysis based on equivalent but statistically independent subsamples of FET PET images was performed in 50 newly diagnosed and histomolecularly characterized glioma patients. A total of 1,302 radiomics features were calculated from semi-automatically segmented tumor volumes-of-interest (VOIs). Furthermore, to investigate the influence of the spatial resolution of PET on repeatability, spherical VOIs of different sizes were positioned in the tumor and healthy brain tissue. Feature repeatability was assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). To further investigate the influence of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genotype on feature repeatability, a hierarchical cluster analysis was performed. For tumor VOIs, 73% of first-order features and 71% of features extracted from the gray level co-occurrence matrix showed high repeatability (ICC 95% confidence interval, 0.91–1.00). In the largest spherical tumor VOIs, 67% of features showed high repeatability, significantly decreasing towards smaller VOIs. The IDH genotype did not affect feature repeatability. Based on 297 repeatable features, two clusters were identified separating patients with IDH-wildtype glioma from those with an IDH mutation. Our results suggest that robust features can be obtained from routinely acquired FET PET scans, which are valuable for further standardization of radiomics analyses in neurooncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Gutsche
- Research Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), 52425 Juelich, Germany; (R.G.); (J.S.); (M.K.); (G.R.F.); (N.J.S.); (K.-J.L.); (N.G.)
- RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Scheins
- Research Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), 52425 Juelich, Germany; (R.G.); (J.S.); (M.K.); (G.R.F.); (N.J.S.); (K.-J.L.); (N.G.)
| | - Martin Kocher
- Research Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), 52425 Juelich, Germany; (R.G.); (J.S.); (M.K.); (G.R.F.); (N.J.S.); (K.-J.L.); (N.G.)
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities Aachen, Bonn, Duesseldorf and Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Khaled Bousabarah
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Gereon R. Fink
- Research Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), 52425 Juelich, Germany; (R.G.); (J.S.); (M.K.); (G.R.F.); (N.J.S.); (K.-J.L.); (N.G.)
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Nadim J. Shah
- Research Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), 52425 Juelich, Germany; (R.G.); (J.S.); (M.K.); (G.R.F.); (N.J.S.); (K.-J.L.); (N.G.)
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
- JARA-BRAIN-Translational Medicine, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Research Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), 52425 Juelich, Germany; (R.G.); (J.S.); (M.K.); (G.R.F.); (N.J.S.); (K.-J.L.); (N.G.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities Aachen, Bonn, Duesseldorf and Cologne, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Research Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), 52425 Juelich, Germany; (R.G.); (J.S.); (M.K.); (G.R.F.); (N.J.S.); (K.-J.L.); (N.G.)
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities Aachen, Bonn, Duesseldorf and Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Research Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), 52425 Juelich, Germany; (R.G.); (J.S.); (M.K.); (G.R.F.); (N.J.S.); (K.-J.L.); (N.G.)
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tamal M. Intensity threshold based solid tumour segmentation method for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) images: A review. Heliyon 2020; 6:e05267. [PMID: 33163642 PMCID: PMC7610228 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate, robust and reproducible delineation of tumour in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is essential for diagnosis, treatment planning and response assessment. Since standardized uptake value (SUV) – a normalized semiquantitative parameter used in PET is represented by the intensity of the PET images and related to the radiotracer uptake, a SUV based threshold method is a natural choice to delineate the tumour. However, determination of an optimum threshold value is a challenging task due to low spatial resolution, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) along with finite image sampling constraint. The aim of the review is to summarize different fixed and adaptive threshold-based PET image segmentation approaches under a common mathematical framework Advantages and disadvantages of different threshold based methods are also highlighted from the perspectives of diagnosis, treatment planning and response assessment. Several fixed threshold values (30%–70% of the maximum SUV of the tumour (SUVmaxT)) have been investigated. It has been reported that the fixed threshold-based method is very much dependent on the SNR, tumour to background ratio (TBR) and the size of the tumour. Adaptive threshold-based method, an alternative to fixed threshold, can minimize these dependencies by accounting for tumour to background ratio (TBR) and tumour size. However, the parameters for the adaptive methods need to be calibrated for each PET camera system (e.g., scanner geometry, image acquisition protocol, reconstruction algorithm etc.) and it is not straight forward to implement the same procedure to other PET systems to obtain similar results. It has been reported that the performance of the adaptive methods is also not optimum for smaller volumes with lower TBR and SNR. Statistical analysis carried out on the NEMA thorax phantom images also indicates that regions segmented by the fixed threshold method are significantly different for all cases. On the other hand, the adaptive method provides significantly different segmented regions only for low TBR with different SNR. From this viewpoint, a robust threshold based segmentation method that will be less sensitive to SUVmaxT, SNR, TBR and volume needs to be developed. It was really challenging to compare the performance of different threshold-based methods because the performance of each method was tested on dissimilar data set with different data acquisition and reconstruction protocols along with different TBR, SNR and volumes. To avoid such difficulties, it will be desirable to have a common database of clinical PET images acquired with different image acquisition protocols and different PET cameras to compare the performance of automatic segmentation methods. It is also suggested to report the changes in SNR and TBR while reporting the response using threshold based methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahbubunnabi Tamal
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, PO Box 1982, Dammam, 31441, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schneider F, Wolpert F, Stolzmann P, Albatly AA, Kenkel D, Weller J, Weller M, Kollias SS, Rushing EJ, Veit-Haibach P, Huellner MW. Prognostic value of O-(2-[ 18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET in relapsing oligodendroglioma. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1357-1364. [PMID: 32686979 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1787507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the relationship between F-18-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine positron emission tomography (FET-PET) parameters of relapsing oligodendroglioma and progression-free survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS The relationship of clinical parameters, FET-PET parameters (SUVmax, TBRmax, BTV, time-activity curves) and progression-free survival was analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis in 42 adult patients with relapsing oligodendroglioma. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess survival. RESULTS Patients who did not undergo surgical resection of their relapsing tumor had significantly lower PFS if the tumor exhibited an SUVmax above 3.40 than those with an SUVmax below 3.40 (13.1 ± 2.3 months vs. 47.3 ± 6.0 months, respectively, p < .001). Patients who underwent surgery had similar PFS as the aforementioned non-operated patients with low SUVmax (53.6 ± 6.7 months, p = .948). The same was true for TBRmax using a threshold of 3.03 (PFS 12.5 ± 2.4 months vs. 44.0 ± 6.3 months / 53.6 ± 6.7 months, respectively; p < .001 / p = .825). Also, subjects with BTV below 10 cm3 that did not undergo surgery had a similar PFS as subjects who underwent surgery (40.2 ± 6.0 months vs. 52.4 ± 8.9 months, respectively, p = .587). Subjects with BTV above 10 cm3 and without surgery had a significantly worse PFS (13.8 ± 3.3 months, p < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that the prognostication by clinical parameters is improved by adding TBRmax to the model (AUC 0.945 (95% CI: 0.881-1.000), true classification rate 88.1%). CONCLUSION FET-PET may provide added value for the prognostication of relapsing oligodendroglioma in addition to clinical parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Schneider
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich/University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Fabian Wolpert
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich/University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Paul Stolzmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich/University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Abdulrahman A. Albatly
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich/University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - David Kenkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich/University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan Weller
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich/University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich/University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Spyros S. Kollias
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich/University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Elisabeth J. Rushing
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Zurich/University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Veit-Haibach
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich/University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Martin W. Huellner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich/University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Main genetic differences in high-grade gliomas may present different MR imaging and MR spectroscopy correlates. Eur Radiol 2020; 31:749-763. [PMID: 32875375 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07138-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether the main genetic differences observed in high-grade gliomas (HGG) will present different MR imaging and MR spectroscopy correlates that could be used to better characterize lesions in the clinical setting. METHODS Seventy-nine patients with histologically confirmed HGG were recruited. Immunohistochemistry analyses for isocitrate dehydrogenase gene 1 (IDH1), alpha thalassemia mental retardation X-linked gene (ATRX), Ki-67, and p53 protein expression were performed. Tumour radiological features were examined on MR images. Metabolic profile and infiltrative pattern were assessed with MR spectroscopy. MR features were analysed to identify imaging-molecular associations. The Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox regression model were used to identify survival prognostic factors. RESULTS In total, 17.7% of the lesions were IDH1-mutated, 8.9% presented ATRX-mutated, 70.9% presented p53 unexpressed, and 22.8% had Ki-67 > 5%. IDH1 wild-type tumours had higher levels of mobile lipids (p = 0.001). The tumour-infiltrative pattern was higher in HGG with unexpressed p53 (p = 0.009). Mutated ATRX tumours presented higher levels of glutamate and glutamine (Glx) (p = 0.001). An association was observed between Glx tumour levels (p = 0.038) and Ki-67 expression (p = 0.008) with the infiltrative pattern. Survival analyses identified IDH1 status, age, and tumour choline levels as independent predictors of prognostic significance. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that IDH1-wt tumours are more necrotic than IDH1-mut. And that the presence of an infiltrative pattern in HGG is associated with loss of p53 expression, Ki-67 index, and Glx levels. Finally, tumour choline levels could be used as a predictive factor in survival in addition to the IDH1 status to provide a more accurate prediction of survival in HGG patients. KEY POINTS • IDH1-wt tumours present higher levels of mobile lipids than IDH1-mut. • Mutated ATRX tumours exhibit higher levels of glutamate and glutamine. • Loss of p53 expression, Ki-67 expression, and glutamate and glutamine levels may contribute to the presence of an infiltrative pattern in HGG.
Collapse
|
21
|
Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) specific PET for advanced target volume delineation in glioblastoma. Radiother Oncol 2020; 150:159-163. [PMID: 32598977 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.06.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Revised: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP)-specific Positron Emission Tomography (PET) has shown promising results in various cancers. This pilot study compares FAP-specific PET to MRI for treatment planning in 13 Glioblastoma patients. The resulting incongruent volumes could provide additional information for radiotherapy or biopsy planning.
Collapse
|
22
|
Seidensaal K, Harrabi SB, Debus J. Molecular Imaging for Particle Therapy: Current Approach and Future Directions. Recent Results Cancer Res 2020; 216:865-879. [PMID: 32594410 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-42618-7_28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
During the last decades, radiation oncology has been subject to a number of technological innovations. Particle therapy has evolved in parallel to the modern high-precision photon radiotherapy techniques and offers a superior dose distribution with decreased integral dose to healthy tissues. With advancing precision of treatment, the necessity for accurate and confident target volume delineation is rising. When morphological imaging reaches its limitations, molecular imaging can provide valuable information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Ben Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lohmeier J, Bohner G, Siebert E, Brenner W, Hamm B, Makowski MR. Quantitative biparametric analysis of hybrid 18F-FET PET/MR-neuroimaging for differentiation between treatment response and recurrent glioma. Sci Rep 2019; 9:14603. [PMID: 31601829 PMCID: PMC6787240 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50182-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigated the diagnostic potential of simultaneous 18F-FET PET/MR-imaging for differentiation between recurrent glioma and post-treatment related effects (PTRE) using quantitative volumetric (3D-VOI) lesion analysis. In this retrospective study, a total of 42 patients including 32 patients with histologically proven glioma relapse and 10 patients with PTRE (histopathologic follow-up, n = 4, serial imaging follow-up, n = 6) were evaluated regarding recurrence. PET/MR-imaging was semi-automatically analysed based on FET tracer uptake using conservative SUV thresholding (isocontour 80%) with emphasis on the metabolically most active regions. Mean (relative) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmean, rADCmean), standardised-uptake-value (SUV) including target-to-background (TBR) ratio were determined. Glioma relapse presented higher ADCmean (MD ± SE, 284 ± 91, p = 0.003) and TBRmax (MD ± SE, 1.10 ± 0.45, p = 0.02) values than treatment-related changes. Both ADCmean (AUC ± SE = 0.82 ± 0.07, p-value < 0.001) and TBRmax (AUC ± SE = 0.81 ± 0.08, p-value < 0.001) achieved reliable diagnostic performance in differentiating glioma recurrence from PTRE. Bivariate analysis based on a combination of ADCmean and TBRmax demonstrated highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC ± SE = 0.90 ± 0.05, p-value < 0.001), improving clinical (false negative and false positive) classification. In conclusion, biparametric analysis using DWI and FET PET, both providing distinct information regarding the underlying pathophysiology, presented best diagnostic accuracy and clinical benefit in differentiating recurrent glioma from treatment-related changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Lohmeier
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Radiology, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Georg Bohner
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Neuroradiology, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eberhard Siebert
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Neuroradiology, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Winfried Brenner
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum (CVK), Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Hamm
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Radiology, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus R Makowski
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Radiology, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Carbon ion radiotherapy in the treatment of gliomas: a review. J Neurooncol 2019; 145:191-199. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03303-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
25
|
Report of first recurrent glioma patients examined with PET-MRI prior to re-irradiation. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0216111. [PMID: 31339892 PMCID: PMC6655559 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The advantage of combined PET-MRI over sequential PET and MRI is the high spatial conformity and the absence of time delay between the examinations. The benefit of this technique for planning of re-irradiation (re-RT) treatment is unkown yet. Imaging data from a phase 1 trial of re-RT for recurrent glioma was analysed to assess whether planning target volumes and treatment margins in glioma re-RT can be adjusted by PET-MRI with rater independent PET based biological tumour volumes (BTVs). Patients and methods Combined PET-MRI with the tracer O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) prior to re-RT was performed in recurrent glioma patients in a phase I trial. GTVs including all regions suspicious of tumour on contrast enhanced MRI were delineated by three experienced radiation oncologists and included into MRI based consensus GTVs (MRGTVs). BTVs were semi-automatically delineated with a fixed threshold of 1.6 x background activity. Corresponding BTVs and MRGTVs were fused into union volume PET-MRGTVs. The Sørensen–Dice coefficient and the conformity index were used to assess the geometric overlap of the BTVs with the MRGTVs. A recurrence pattern analysis was performed based on the original planning target volumes (PTVs = GTV + 10 mm margin or 5 mm in one case) and the PET-MRGTVs with margins of 10, 8, 5 and 3 mm. Results Seven recurrent glioma patients, who received PET-MRI prior to re-RT, were included into the present planning study. At the time of re-RT, patients were in median 54 years old and had a median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score of 80. Median post-recurrence survival after the beginning of re-RT was 13 months. Concomitant bevacizumab therapy was applied in six patients and one patient received chemoradiation with temozolomide. Median GTV volumes of the three radiation oncologists were 35.0, 37.5 and 40.5 cubic centimeters (cc) and median MRGTV volume 41.8 cc. Median BTV volume was 36.6 cc and median PET-MRGTV volume 59.3 cc. The median Sørensen–Dice coefficient for the comparison between MRGTV and BTV was 0.61 and the median conformity index 0.44. Recurrence pattern analysis revealed two central, two in-field and one distant recurrence within both, the original PTV, as well as the PET-MRGTV with a reduced margin of 3 mm. Conclusion PET-MRI provides radiation treatment planning imaging with high spatial and timely conformity for high-grade glioma patients treated with re-RT with potential advancements for target volume delineation. Prospective randomised trials are warranted to further investigate the treatment benefits of PET-MRI based re-RT planning.
Collapse
|
26
|
Zhang Q, Gao X, Wei G, Qiu C, Qu H, Zhou X. Prognostic Value of MTV, SUVmax and the T/N Ratio of PET/CT in Patients with Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Cancer 2019; 10:1707-1716. [PMID: 31205526 PMCID: PMC6548003 DOI: 10.7150/jca.28605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In the past decade, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has become an important imaging tool for clinical assessment of tumor patients. Our meta-analysis aimed to compare the predictive value of PET/CT parameters regard to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes in glioma. Methods: Relevant articles were systematically searched in PMC, PubMed, EMBASE and WEB of science. Studies involving the prognostic roles of PET/CT parameters with OS and PFS in glioma patients were evaluated. The impact of metabolic tumor volume (MTV), maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax), and the ratio of uptake in tumor to normal (T/N ratio) on survival was measured by calculating combined hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 32 articles with 1715 patients were included. The combined HRs of higher MTV, higher SUVmax and higher T/N ratio for OS were 1.14 (95% CI: 0.98-1.32, P heterogeneity<0.001), 1.69 (95% CI: 1.18-2.41, P heterogeneity<0.001) and 1.68 (95% CI: 1.40-2.01, P heterogeneity< 0.001), respectively. Regarding PFS, the combined HRs were 1.04 (95% CI: 0.97-1.11, P heterogeneity=0.002) with higher MTV, 1.45 (95% CI: 1.11-1.90, P heterogeneity<0.001) with higher SUVmax and 2.07 (95% CI: 1.45-2.95, P heterogeneity<0.001) with higher T/N ratio. Results remained similar in the sub-group analyses. Conclusion: PET/CT parameters T/N ratio may be a significant prognostic factor in patients with glioma. Evidence of SUVmax and MTV needed more large-scale studies performed to validate. PET/CT scan could be a promising technique to provide prognostic information for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xinghua People's Hospital, Xinghua 225700, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Xian Gao
- Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Guohua Wei
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Cheng Qiu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Hongyi Qu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xinghua People's Hospital, Xinghua 225700, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Xin Zhou
- Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Chiblak S, Tang Z, Lemke D, Knoll M, Dokic I, Warta R, Moustafa M, Mier W, Brons S, Rapp C, Muschal S, Seidel P, Bendszus M, Adeberg S, Wiestler OD, Haberkorn U, Debus J, Herold-Mende C, Wick W, Abdollahi A. Carbon irradiation overcomes glioma radioresistance by eradicating stem cells and forming an antiangiogenic and immunopermissive niche. JCI Insight 2019; 4:123837. [PMID: 30674721 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.123837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 12/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor radioresistance leading to local therapy failure remains a major obstacle for successful treatment of high-grade glioma. We hypothesized that distinct radiobiological features of particle therapy with carbon ions may circumvent glioma radioresistance. We demonstrate that carbon irradiation (CIR) efficiently eradicates radioresistant patient-derived glioma stem cells (GSCs), leading to growth inhibition and prolonged survival. The impact of CIR at the tumor-stroma interface was further investigated in 2 syngeneic mouse and 2 orthotopic GSC xenograft models. Intriguingly, tumor regressions and long-term local controls were observed at doses greater than or equal to 15-Gy CIR. Fractionated CIR further prolonged survival. The enhanced relative biological effectiveness of CIR in vivo was attributed to its potent antiangiogenic effects and eradication of radioresistant hypoxic tumor cells. Blockade of the HIF1-α/stromal cell-derived factor 1/CXCR4 axis by CIR reduced the recruitment of microglia and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (CD11b+Gr1+). Consequently, CIR abrogated M2-like immune polarization and enhanced the influx of CD8+ cells, generating an immunopermissive niche. We report that radiotherapy with carbon ions could surmount several central glioma resistance mechanisms by eradicating hypoxic and stem cell-like tumor cells, as well as modulating the glioma niche toward an antiangiogenic and less immunosuppressive state. Conclusively, potentially novel rationales for CIR in conquering glioma radioresistance are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Chiblak
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School and National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Zili Tang
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School and National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dieter Lemke
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Medical School and National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Knoll
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School and National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ivana Dokic
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School and National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rolf Warta
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mahmoud Moustafa
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School and National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Walter Mier
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Medical School and National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School and National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carmen Rapp
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Muschal
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School and National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Seidel
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School and National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Bendszus
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Medical School and National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School and National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Uwe Haberkorn
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Medical School and National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School and National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christel Herold-Mende
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Medical School and National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School and National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rausch I, Zitterl A, Berroterán-Infante N, Rischka L, Prayer D, Fenchel M, Sareshgi RA, Haug AR, Hacker M, Beyer T, Traub-Weidinger T. Dynamic [18F]FET-PET/MRI using standard MRI-based attenuation correction methods. Eur Radiol 2019; 29:4276-4285. [PMID: 30635757 PMCID: PMC6610265 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5942-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM To assess if tumour grading based on dynamic [18F]FET positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) studies is affected by different MRI-based attenuation correction (AC) methods. METHODS Twenty-four patients with suspected brain tumours underwent dynamic [18F]FET-PET/MRI examinations and subsequent low-dose computed tomography (CT) scans of the head. The dynamic PET data was reconstructed using the following AC methods: standard Dixon-based AC and ultra-short echo time MRI-based AC (MR-AC) and a model-based AC approach. All data were reconstructed also using CT-based AC (reference). For all lesions and reconstructions, time-activity curves (TACs) and time to peak (TTP) were extracted using different region-of-interest (ROI) and volume-of-interest (VOI) definitions. According to the most common evaluation approaches, TACs were categorised into two or three distinct curve patterns. Changes in TTP and TAC patterns compared to PET using CT-based AC were reported. RESULTS In the majority of cases, TAC patterns did not change. However, TAC pattern changes as well as changes in TTP were observed in up to 8% and 17% of the cases when using different MR-AC methods and ROI/VOI definitions, respectively. However, these changes in TTP and TAC pattern were attributed to different delineations of the ROIs/VOIs in PET corrected with different AC methods. CONCLUSION PET/MRI using different MR-AC methods can be used for the assessment of TAC patterns in dynamic [18F]FET studies, as long as a meaningful delineation of the area of interest within the tumour is ensured. KEY POINTS • PET/MRI using different MR-AC methods can be used for dynamic [18F]FET studies. • A meaningful segmentation of the area of interest needs to be ensured, mandating a visual validation of the delineation by an experienced reader.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivo Rausch
- QIMP Team, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Zitterl
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Neydher Berroterán-Infante
- QIMP Team, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lucas Rischka
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniela Prayer
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Reza A Sareshgi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Radiology-Technique, University of Applied Science, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander R Haug
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marcus Hacker
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Beyer
- QIMP Team, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tatjana Traub-Weidinger
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dai X, Liao K, Zhuang Z, Chen B, Zhou Z, Zhou S, Lin G, Zhang F, Lin Y, Miao Y, Li Z, Huang R, Qiu Y, Lin R. AHIF promotes glioblastoma progression and radioresistance via exosomes. Int J Oncol 2018; 54:261-270. [PMID: 30387845 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has the highest mortality rate among patients with brain tumors, and radiotherapy forms an important part of its treatment. Thus, there is an urgent requirement to elucidate the mechanisms conferring GBM progression and radioresistance. In the present study, it was identified that antisense transcript of hypoxia‑inducible factor‑1α (AHIF) was significantly upregulated in GBM cancerous tissues, as well as in radioresistant GBM cells. The expression of AHIF was also upregulated in response to radiation. Knockdown of AHIF in GBM cells decreased viability and invasive capacities, and increased the proportion of apoptotic cells. By contrast, overexpression of AHIF in GBM cells increased viability and invasive capacities, and decreased the proportion of apoptotic cells. Furthermore, exosomes derived from AHIF‑knockdown GBM cells inhibited viability, invasion and radioresistance, whereas exosomes derived from AHIF‑overexpressing GBM cells promoted viability, invasion and radioresistance. Further biochemical analysis identified that AHIF regulates factors associated with migration and angiogenesis in exosomes. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to establish that AHIF promotes glioblastoma progression and radioresistance via exosomes, which suggests that AHIF is a potential therapeutic target for GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuejun Dai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian 363000, P.R. China
| | - Keman Liao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200120, P.R. China
| | - Zhijun Zhuang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian 363000, P.R. China
| | - Binghong Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200120, P.R. China
| | - Zhiyi Zhou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200120, P.R. China
| | - Sunhai Zhou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200120, P.R. China
| | - Guoshi Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian 363000, P.R. China
| | - Feifei Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian 363000, P.R. China
| | - Yingying Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200120, P.R. China
| | - Yifeng Miao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200120, P.R. China
| | - Zhiqiang Li
- Shanghai Neurological Research Institute of Anhui University of Science and Technology, Shanghai Fengxian District Central Hospital, Shanghai 201499, P.R. China
| | - Renhua Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200120, P.R. China
| | - Yongming Qiu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200120, P.R. China
| | - Ruisheng Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian 363000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lohmann P, Stavrinou P, Lipke K, Bauer EK, Ceccon G, Werner JM, Neumaier B, Fink GR, Shah NJ, Langen KJ, Galldiks N. FET PET reveals considerable spatial differences in tumour burden compared to conventional MRI in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 46:591-602. [PMID: 30327856 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4188-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Areas of contrast enhancement (CE) on MRI are usually the target for resection or radiotherapy target volume definition in glioblastomas. However, the solid tumour mass may extend beyond areas of CE. Amino acid PET can detect parts of the tumour that show no CE. We systematically investigated tumour volumes delineated by amino acid PET and MRI in patients with newly diagnosed, untreated glioblastoma. METHODS Preoperatively, 50 patients with neuropathologically confirmed glioblastoma underwent O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and contrast-enhanced MRI. Areas of CE were manually segmented. FET PET tumour volumes were segmented using a tumour-to-brain ratio of ≥1.6. The percentage overlap volumes, and Dice and Jaccard spatial similarity coefficients (DSC, JSC) were calculated. FLAIR images were evaluated visually. RESULTS In 43 patients (86%), the FET tumour volume was significantly larger than the CE volume (21.5 ± 14.3 mL vs. 9.4 ± 11.3 mL; P < 0.001). Forty patients (80%) showed both increased uptake of FET and CE. In these 40 patients, the spatial similarity between FET uptake and CE was low (mean DSC 0.39 ± 0.21, mean JSC 0.26 ± 0.16). Ten patients (20%) showed no CE, and one of these patients showed no FET uptake. In five patients (10%), increased FET uptake was present outside areas of FLAIR hyperintensity. CONCLUSION Our results show that the metabolically active tumour volume delineated by FET PET is significantly larger than tumour volume delineated by CE. Furthermore, the results strongly suggest that the information derived from both imaging modalities should be integrated into the management of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany.
| | | | - Katharina Lipke
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany
| | - Elena K Bauer
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Garry Ceccon
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Bernd Neumaier
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nadim J Shah
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Debus C, Afshar-Oromieh A, Floca R, Ingrisch M, Knoll M, Debus J, Haberkorn U, Abdollahi A. Feasibility and robustness of dynamic 18F-FET PET based tracer kinetic models applied to patients with recurrent high-grade glioma prior to carbon ion irradiation. Sci Rep 2018; 8:14760. [PMID: 30283013 PMCID: PMC6170489 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33034-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the robustness and diagnostic value of different compartment models for dynamic 18F-FET PET in recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG). Dynamic 18F-FET PET data of patients with recurrent WHO grade III (n:7) and WHO grade IV (n: 9) tumors undergoing re-irradiation with carbon ions were analyzed by voxelwise fitting of the time-activity curves with a simplified and an extended one-tissue compartment model (1TCM) and a two-tissue compartment model (2TCM), respectively. A simulation study was conducted to assess robustness and precision of the 2TCM. Parameter maps showed enhanced detail on tumor substructure. Neglecting the blood volume VB in the 1TCM yields insufficient results. Parameter K1 from both 1TCM and 2TCM showed correlation with overall patient survival after carbon ion irradiation (p = 0.043 and 0.036, respectively). The 2TCM yields realistic estimates for tumor blood volume, which was found to be significantly higher in WHO IV compared to WHO III (p = 0.031). Simulations on the 2TCM showed that K1 yields good accuracy and robustness while k2 showed lowest stability of all parameters. The 1TCM provides the best compromise between parameter stability and model accuracy; however application of the 2TCM is still feasible and provides a more accurate representation of tracer-kinetics at the cost of reduced robustness. Detailed tracer kinetic analysis of 18F-FET PET with compartment models holds valuable information on tumor substructures and provides additional diagnostic and prognostic value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Debus
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Ali Afshar-Oromieh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ralf Floca
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Ingrisch
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Knoll
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uwe Haberkorn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|