lncRNA transcriptional initiation induces chromatin remodeling within a limited range in the fission yeast fbp1 promoter

Metabolic stress-induced long ncRNA transcription governs the formation of meiotic DNA breaks in the fission yeast fbp1 gene

Meiotic recombination is a pivotal process that ensures faithful chromosome segregation and contributes to the generation of genetic diversity in offspring, which is initiated by the formation of double-strand breaks (DSBs). The distribution of meiotic DSBs is not uniform and is clustered at hotspots, which can be affected by environmental conditions. Here, we show that non-coding RNA (ncRNA) transcription creates meiotic DSBs through local chromatin remodeling in the fission yeast fbp1 gene. The fbp1 gene is activated upon glucose starvation stress, in which a cascade of ncRNA-transcription in the fbp1 upstream region converts the chromatin configuration into an open structure, leading to the subsequent binding of transcription factors. We examined the distribution of meiotic DSBs around the fbp1 upstream region in the presence and absence of glucose and observed several new DSBs after chromatin conversion under glucose starvation conditions. Moreover, these DSBs disappeared when cis-elements required for ncRNA transcription were mutated. These results indicate that ncRNA transcription creates meiotic DSBs in response to stress conditions in the fbp1 upstream region. This study addressed part of a long-standing unresolved mechanism underlying meiotic recombination plasticity in response to environmental fluctuation.

On the Role of Glycolysis in Early Tumorigenesis-Permissive and Executioner Effects

Reprogramming energy production from mitochondrial respiration to glycolysis is now considered a hallmark of cancer. When tumors grow beyond a certain size they give rise to changes in their microenvironment (e.g., hypoxia, mechanical stress) that are conducive to the upregulation of glycolysis. Over the years, however, it has become clear that glycolysis can also associate with the earliest steps of tumorigenesis. Thus, many of the oncoproteins most commonly involved in tumor initiation and progression upregulate glycolysis. Moreover, in recent years, considerable evidence has been reported suggesting that upregulated glycolysis itself, through its enzymes and/or metabolites, may play a causative role in tumorigenesis, either by acting itself as an oncogenic stimulus or by facilitating the appearance of oncogenic mutations. In fact, several changes induced by upregulated glycolysis have been shown to be involved in tumor initiation and early tumorigenesis: glycolysis-induced chromatin remodeling, inhibition of premature senescence and induction of proliferation, effects on DNA repair, O-linked N-acetylglucosamine modification of target proteins, antiapoptotic effects, induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition or autophagy, and induction of angiogenesis. In this article we summarize the evidence that upregulated glycolysis is involved in tumor initiation and, in the following, we propose a mechanistic model aimed at explaining how upregulated glycolysis may play such a role.

Regulation Mechanisms of Meiotic Recombination Revealed from the Analysis of a Fission Yeast Recombination Hotspot ade6-M26

Meiotic recombination is a pivotal event that ensures faithful chromosome segregation and creates genetic diversity in gametes. Meiotic recombination is initiated by programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs), which are catalyzed by the conserved Spo11 protein. Spo11 is an enzyme with structural similarity to topoisomerase II and induces DSBs through the nucleophilic attack of the phosphodiester bond by the hydroxy group of its tyrosine (Tyr) catalytic residue. DSBs caused by Spo11 are repaired by homologous recombination using homologous chromosomes as donors, resulting in crossovers/chiasmata, which ensure physical contact between homologous chromosomes. Thus, the site of meiotic recombination is determined by the site of the induced DSB on the chromosome. Meiotic recombination is not uniformly induced, and sites showing high recombination rates are referred to as recombination hotspots. In fission yeast, ade6-M26, a nonsense point mutation of ade6 is a well-characterized meiotic recombination hotspot caused by the heptanucleotide sequence 5'-ATGACGT-3' at the M26 mutation point. In this review, we summarize the meiotic recombination mechanisms revealed by the analysis of the fission ade6-M26 gene as a model system.

Multi-Layered Regulations on the Chromatin Architectures: Establishing the Tight and Specific Responses of Fission Yeast fbp1 Gene Transcription

Transcriptional regulation is pivotal for all living organisms and is required for adequate response to environmental fluctuations and intercellular signaling molecules. For precise regulation of transcription, cells have evolved regulatory systems on the genome architecture, including the chromosome higher-order structure (e.g., chromatin loops), location of transcription factor (TF)-binding sequences, non-coding RNA (ncRNA) transcription, chromatin configuration (e.g., nucleosome positioning and histone modifications), and the topological state of the DNA double helix. To understand how these genome-chromatin architectures and their regulators establish tight and specific responses at the transcription stage, the fission yeast fbp1 gene has been analyzed as a model system for decades. The fission yeast fbp1 gene is tightly repressed in the presence of glucose, and this gene is induced by over three orders of magnitude upon glucose starvation with a cascade of multi-layered regulations on various levels of genome and chromatin architecture. In this review article, we summarize the multi-layered transcriptional regulatory systems revealed by the analysis of the fission yeast fbp1 gene as a model system.

Reciprocal stabilization of transcription factor binding integrates two signaling pathways to regulate fission yeast fbp1 transcription

Transcriptional regulation, a pivotal biological process by which cells adapt to environmental fluctuations, is achieved by the binding of transcription factors to target sequences in a sequence-specific manner. However, how transcription factors recognize the correct target from amongst the numerous candidates in a genome has not been fully elucidated. We here show that, in the fission-yeast fbp1 gene, when transcription factors bind to target sequences in close proximity, their binding is reciprocally stabilized, thereby integrating distinct signal transduction pathways. The fbp1 gene is massively induced upon glucose starvation by the activation of two transcription factors, Atf1 and Rst2, mediated via distinct signal transduction pathways. Atf1 and Rst2 bind to the upstream-activating sequence 1 region, carrying two binding sites located 45 bp apart. Their binding is reciprocally stabilized due to the close proximity of the two target sites, which destabilizes the independent binding of Atf1 or Rst2. Tup11/12 (Tup-family co-repressors) suppress independent binding. These data demonstrate a previously unappreciated mechanism by which two transcription-factor binding sites, in close proximity, integrate two independent-signal pathways, thereby behaving as a hub for signal integration.

lncRNA transcription induces meiotic recombination through chromatin remodelling in fission yeast

Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) are involved in various biological processes, including gene expression, development, and disease. Here, we identify a novel consensus sequence of a cis-element involved in long ncRNA (lncRNA) transcription and demonstrate that lncRNA transcription from this cis-element activates meiotic recombination via chromatin remodeling. In the fission yeast fbp1 gene, glucose starvation induces a series of promoter-associated lncRNAs, referred to as metabolic-stress-induced lncRNAs (mlonRNAs), which contribute to chromatin remodeling and fbp1 activation. Translocation of the cis-element required for mlonRNA into a well-characterized meiotic recombination hotspot, ade6-M26, further stimulates transcription and meiotic recombination via local chromatin remodeling. The consensus sequence of this cis-element (mlon-box) overlaps with meiotic recombination sites in the fission yeast genome. At one such site, the SPBC24C6.09c upstream region, meiotic double-strand break (DSB) formation is induced in an mlon-box-dependent manner. Therefore, mlonRNA transcription plays a universal role in chromatin remodeling and the regulation of transcription and recombination.

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in spermatogenesis and male infertility

BACKGROUND

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have a size of more than 200 bp and are known to regulate a host of crucial cellular processes like proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis by regulating gene expression. While small noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) such as miRNAs, siRNAs, Piwi-interacting RNAs have been extensively studied in male germ cell development, the role of lncRNAs in spermatogenesis remains largely unknown.

OBJECTIVE

In this article, we have reviewed the biology and role of lncRNAs in spermatogenesis along with the tools available for data analysis.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Till date, three microarray and four RNA-seq studies have been undertaken to identify lncRNAs in mouse testes or germ cells. These studies were done on pre-natal, post-natal, adult testis, and different germ cells to identify lncRNAs regulating spermatogenesis. In case of humans, five RNA-seq studies on different germ cell populations, including two on sperm, were undertaken. We compared three studies on human germ cells to identify common lncRNAs and found 15 lncRNAs (LINC00635, LINC00521, LINC00174, LINC00654, LINC00710, LINC00226, LINC00326, LINC00494, LINC00535, LINC00616, LINC00662, LINC00668, LINC00467, LINC00608, and LINC00658) to show consistent differential expression across these studies. Some of the targets of these lncRNAs included CENPB, FAM98B, GOLGA6 family, RPGR, TPM2, GNB5, KCNQ10T1, TAZ, LIN28A, CDKN2B, CDKN2A, CDKN1A, CDKN1B, CDKN1C, EZH2, SUZ12, VEGFA genes. A lone study on human male infertility identified 9879 differentially expressed lncRNAs with three (lnc32058, lnc09522, and lnc98497) of them showing specific and high expression in immotile sperm in comparison to normal motile sperm. A few lncRNAs (Mrhl, Drm, Spga-lncRNAs, NLC1-C, HongrES2, Tsx, LncRNA-tcam1, Tug1, Tesra, AK015322, Gm2044, and LncRNA033862) have been functionally validated for their roles in spermatogenesis. Apart from rodents and humans, studies on sheep and bull have also identified lncRNAs potentially important for spermatogenesis. A number of these non-coding RNAs are strong candidates for further research on their roles in spermatogenesis.

Phosphorylation of the Transcription Factor Atf1 at Multiple Sites by the MAP Kinase Sty1 Controls Homologous Recombination and Transcription

Transcription factors are often the downstream effectors of signaling cascades. In fission yeast, the transcription factor Atf1 is phosphorylated by the MAP kinase Sty1 under several environmental stressors to promote transcription initiation of stress genes. However, Sty1 and Atf1 have also been involved in other cellular processes such as homologous recombination at hotspots, ste11 gene expression during mating and meiosis, or regulation of fbp1 gene transcription under glucose starvation conditions. Using different phospho-mutants of Atf1, we have investigated the role of Atf1 phosphorylation by Sty1 in those biological processes. An Atf1 mutant lacking the canonical MAP kinase phosphorylation sites cannot activate fbp1 transcription when glucose is depleted, but it is still able to induce recombination at ade6.M26 and to induce ste11 after nitrogen depletion; in these last cases, Sty1 is still required, suggesting that additional non-canonical sites are activating the transcription factor. In all cases, an Atf1 phosphomimetic mutant bypasses the requirement of the Sty1 kinase in these diverse biological processes, highlighting the essential role of the DNA binding factor Atf1 on chromatin remodeling and cell adaptation to nutritional changes. We propose that post-translational modifications of Atf1 by Sty1, either at canonical or non-canonical sites, are sufficient to activate some of the functions of Atf1, those involving chromatin remodeling and transcription initiation. However, in the case of fbp1 where Atf1 acts synergistically with other transcription factors, elimination of the canonical sites is sufficient to hamper some of the interactions required in this complex scenario and to impair transcription initiation.