1
|
Zhao Y, Fan S, Wang Z, Yan X, Luo H. Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-stage vs two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection: a call for a prospective randomized trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:153. [PMID: 38373976 PMCID: PMC10875807 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07229-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication of joint arthroplasty that causes significant pain and economic loss. This study aimed to determine whether the current evidence supports single-stage revision for PJI based on reinfection and reoperation rates. METHODS We searched the PubMed, EBSCO, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to 30 May 2023 to identify studies that compared single-stage revision and two-stage revision for PJI. Data on reinfection and reoperation rates were pooled. RESULTS This meta-analysis included a total of 40 studies with 8711 patients. Overall, there was no significant difference between single- and two-stage revision regarding the postoperative reinfection rate and reoperation rate. Subgroup analysis by surgery period and different surgical sites revealed no difference between the two groups in the reinfection and reoperation rates. CONCLUSIONS Based on the available evidence, our study did not identify a significant difference in reinfection and reoperation rates between single- and two-stage revision for PJI. Given the limitations in inclusion/exclusion criteria and the observed heterogeneity, we acknowledge the complexity of drawing strong conclusions. Therefore, we suggest that the choice between single- and two-stage revision should be carefully considered on an individual basis, taking into account patient-specific factors and further research developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Fengxian District Central Hospital, Shanghai, 201400, China
| | - Shaohua Fan
- Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 317000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhangfu Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 317000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xueli Yan
- Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 317000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hua Luo
- Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 317000, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saccomanno MF, Lädermann A, Collin P. Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Infection Provides Comparable Functional Outcomes to Primary Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Clin Med 2024; 13:904. [PMID: 38337598 PMCID: PMC10856729 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to compare functional outcomes after two-stage revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with the results of primary RSA. Patients affected by PJI and treated by means of two-stage revision RSA were 1:1 matched with a group of patients who were treated electively with RSA without developing any complications. Out of 1477 RSAs performed between 2009 and 2021, 16 patients developed a PJI. Each matched cohort comprised 16 patients (3 females, 13 males). The mean age was 69.13 ± 5.43 years old in the PJI group and 70.28 ± 5.04 (p = 0.543) in the matched cohort. The mean follow-up was 41.23 ± 26.9 months in the PJI group and 28.5 ± 20.2 (p = 0.142) in the matched group. Only one patient showed recurrent PJI five years after revision RSA. Comparison between the PJI patients and matched patients did not show any significant differences at the latest follow-up, nor for subjective shoulder value (SSV) (p = 0.101) or Constant score (p = 0.134). Two-stage exchange RSA for PJI allows for appropriate control of the disease and good functional outcomes. Comparison with an age- and sex-matched cohort of uninfected patients showed no significant differences, thus confirming the idea that revision surgeries may lead to satisfactory functional outcomes, as expected after primary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maristella Francesca Saccomanno
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy;
- Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Spedali Civili, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Alexandre Lädermann
- Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Hôpital de La Tour, Rue J.-D. Maillard 3, 1217 Meyrin, Switzerland
- Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Philippe Collin
- CHP Saint-Gregoire, 6 Boulevard de la Boutière, 35760 Saint-Grégoire, France;
- Clinique Victor Hugo, 5 Bis Rue du Dôme, 75016 Paris, France
- American Hospital of Paris, 55 Boulevard du Château, 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fiore M, Ferra L, Giannini C, Sambri A, Filippini M, Tedeschi S, Zamparini E, Viale P, De Paolis M, Guerra E. Management of periprosthetic joint infection of shoulder arthroplasty: Single-stage versus two-stage protocols. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Shoulder Elbow 2023; 15:25-40. [PMID: 37692869 PMCID: PMC10492529 DOI: 10.1177/17585732221116839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
Background The treatment of shoulder prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) requiring removal of the prosthesis is not well defined. This article aims to systematically review and compare the results of the literature in single-stage and two-stage protocols in the treatment of shoulder PJI. Methods An in-depth search on PubMed/Scopus/Web of Science databases and cross-referencing search was carried out concerning the articles reporting detailed data on the topic. Results A total of 486 shoulder PJIs were included: 137 treated with single-stage and 349 with two-stage procedure. A similar distribution between early and not-early infections (19.1% vs 80.9%) was found between the two groups. The overall rate of success in terms of PJI eradication was significantly higher in the single-stage group (95.6% vs 85.7%, p < 0.001). The non-infection-related complications rate was 13.8% in the single-stage group and 37.6% in the two-stage group (p < 0.001), the non-infection-related revision rate was 8% and 18.9%, respectively (p = 0.005). Discussion The single-phase protocol showed a higher success rate in eradicating the infection and a lower complication rate. However, the low number of patients included, the low quality of the articles, the lack of data on clinical severity and bacteriological virulence suggest caution in conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Fiore
- Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Ferra
- Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Sambri
- Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Sara Tedeschi
- Infectious Disease Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eleonora Zamparini
- Infectious Disease Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Viale
- Infectious Disease Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Massimiliano De Paolis
- Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Enrico Guerra
- Shoulder & Elbow Surgery Department, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lo EY, Ouseph A, Badejo M, Lund J, Bettacchi C, Garofalo R, Krishnan SG. Success of staged revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in eradication of periprosthetic joint infection. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:625-635. [PMID: 36243299 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in shoulder arthroplasty remains a challenge, with no established gold standard treatment. This study presents the unique experience of a high-volume single-surgeon, single-institution approach on staged revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for infection. The authors theorize that staged revision RTSA is an effective treatment for PJI. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2013 and 2018, 38 patients underwent a staged RTSA for treatment of PJI. Patient histories were collected and classified using Cierny-Mader classification. Infection workup for all patients included radiographs, laboratory indices, and computed tomographic aspiration arthrogram. PJI was identified based on high clinical and radiographic suspicion, elevated serologic markers, and/or aspirate culture results per 2018 International Consensus Meeting Shoulder guidelines on Orthopedic Infections. All patients underwent first stage with implant removal, irrigation and débridement, and antibiotic spacer placement. Next, intravenous antibiotics were administered by infectious disease consultants for a minimum of 6 weeks. Infection workup was then repeated and, if normalized, final-stage revision commenced with antibiotic spacer removal and revision to RTSA. If indices were persistently abnormal, an additional stage of débridement and spacer placement procedure was performed. Treatment failure was defined as recurrent periprosthetic infection after final prosthesis implantation or persistently elevated indices despite adequate débridement and spacer placement. RESULTS Mean age of the cohort was 68 (standard deviation [SD] 8.9) years and mean follow-up was 33 (SD 14) months with 34 Cierny-Mader C hosts and 4 B hosts. Patients underwent a mean of 2 (SD 1.1) previous surgeries. The staged revision protocol was successful in 34 (89.5%) patients for management of PJI. Four patients (10.5%) were considered failures with recurrent infections at a mean of 13 months (range 2-26 months) after the final RTSA implantation and underwent repeat staged revisions. Of the 34 patients who had successful infection eradication, 31 had 2-stage treatment and 3 had to undergo 3 stages. There were no treatment-associated mortalities and 10 major complications (26%), including permanent neuropathy, instability, and periprosthetic fractures. The most common cultured microorganism was Cutibacterium acnes (18%), with no polymicrobial infections detected. DISCUSSION Although there are multiple treatment options for PJI management, staged revision remains an effective means of treatment. Although there were several patients who required an additional stage of treatment, and a significant complication rate, staged revision RTSA proved successful in the ultimate eradication of the PJI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eddie Y Lo
- The Shoulder Center Research, Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA; The Shoulder Service, Baylor University Medical Center, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | - Alvin Ouseph
- The Shoulder Center Research, Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA; The Shoulder Service, Baylor University Medical Center, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Julia Lund
- The Shoulder Center Research, Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA; The Shoulder Service, Baylor University Medical Center, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Christopher Bettacchi
- North Texas Infectious Diseases Consultants, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Raffaele Garofalo
- Upper Limb Unit, F Miulli Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti, BA, Italy
| | - Sumant G Krishnan
- The Shoulder Center Research, Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA; The Shoulder Service, Baylor University Medical Center, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Martinez-Catalan N, Nguyen NTV, Morrey ME, O’Driscoll SW, Sanchez-Sotelo J. Two-stage reimplantation for deep infection after total elbow arthroplasty. Shoulder Elbow 2022; 14:668-676. [PMID: 36479006 PMCID: PMC9720873 DOI: 10.1177/17585732211043524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Persistent infection rate after 2-stage reimplantation complicating elbow arthroplasty has been reported to be as high as 25%. The purposes of this retrospective study were to determine the infection eradication rates, complications and outcomes in a cohort of patients treated with two-stage reimplantation for deep periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and to determine possible associated risk factors for treatment failure. Methods Between 2000 and 2017, 52 elbows underwent a two-stage reimplantation for PJI after TEA. There were 22 males and 30 females with a mean age of 61 (range, 25-82) years. The most common bacterium was Staphylococcus epidermidis (28 elbows). Mayo Elbow Performance Scores were calculated at the latest follow-up. Mean follow-up time was 6 years (range, 2-14 years). Results PJI was eradicated in 36 elbows (69%). The remaining 16 elbows were considered treatment failures secondary to recurrent infection. The risk of persistent infection was 3.3 times higher in elbows with retained cement (p 0.04), and 3.5 times higher when the infecting organism was Staphylococcus epidermidis (p 0.06). Conclusion Two-stage reimplantation for PJI after TEA was successful in eradicating deep infection in 69% of cases. The eradication of PJI after TEA still needs to be improved substantially.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Martinez-Catalan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ohlmeier M, Alrustom F, Citak M, Salber J, Gehrke T, Frings J. What Is the Mid-term Survivorship of Infected Rotating-hinge Implants Treated with One-stage-exchange? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479:2714-2722. [PMID: 34153008 PMCID: PMC8726537 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the growing number of studies reporting on periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), there is little information on one-stage exchange arthroplasty for the revision of infected rotating-hinge prostheses, which can be among the most difficult PJI presentations to treat. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES After one-stage direct exchange revision for an infected rotating-hinge TKA prosthesis, and using a multimodal approach for infection control, we asked: (1) What is the survivorship free from repeat revision for infection and survivorship free from reoperation for any cause? (2) What is the clinical outcome, based on the Oxford Knee Score, of these patients at the latest follow-up? METHODS Between January 2011 and December 2017, we treated 101 patients with infected rotating-hinge knee prostheses at our hospital. All patients who underwent a one-stage exchange using another rotating-hinge implant were potentially eligible for this retrospective study. During that period, we generally used a one-stage approach when treating PJIs. Eighty-three percent (84 of 101) of patients were treated with one-stage exchange, and the remainder were treated with two-stage exchange. Of the 84 treated with one-stage exchange, eight patients died of unrelated causes and were therefore excluded, one patient declined to participate in the study, and another eight patients were lost before the minimum study follow-up of 2 years or had incomplete datasets, leaving 80% (67 of 84) for analysis in this study. The included study population consisted of 60% males (40 of 67) with a mean age of 64 ± 8 years and a mean (range) BMI of 30 ± 6 kg/m2 (21 to 40). The mean number of prior surgeries was 4 ± 2 (1 to 9) on the affected knee. Fifteen percent (10 of 67) of knees had a preoperative joint communicating sinus tract, and 66% (44 of 67) had experienced a prior PJI on the affected knee. The antimicrobial regimen was chosen based on the advice of our infectious disease consultant and individually adapted for the organism cultured. The mean follow-up duration was 6 ± 2 years. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed using the endpoints of survivorship free from repeat revision for infection and survivorship free from all-cause revision. The functional outcome was assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (on a 12- to 60-point scale, with lower scores representing less pain and greater function), obtained by interviewing patients for this study at their most recent follow-up visit. Preoperative scores were not obtained. RESULTS The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated an overall survivorship free from reoperation for any cause of 75% (95% CI 64% to 87%) at the mean follow-up of 6 years postoperatively. Survivorship free from any repeat operative procedure for infection was 90% (95% CI 83% to 97%) at 6 years. The mean postoperative Oxford Knee Score was 37 ± 11 points. CONCLUSION With an overall revision rate of about 25% at 6 years and the limited functional results based on the poor Oxford Knee Scores, patients should be counseled to have modest expectations concerning postoperative pain and function level after one-stage exchange of an infected rotating-hinge arthroplasty. Nevertheless, patients may be informed about a reasonable chance of PJI eradication and might opt for this approach as a means to try to avoid high transfemoral amputation or joint arthrodesis, which in this population often is associated with the inability to ambulate at all. Regarding the relatively high number of patients with aseptic loosening, future studies might focus on implant design of revision knee systems as well. A longer course of oral antibiotics after such procedures may also be warranted to limit the chance of reinfection but requires further study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malte Ohlmeier
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fadi Alrustom
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mustafa Citak
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jochen Salber
- Department of Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Thorsten Gehrke
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jannik Frings
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Manasherob R, Mooney JA, Lowenberg DW, Bollyky PL, Amanatullah DF. Tolerant Small-colony Variants Form Prior to Resistance Within a Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Based on Antibiotic Selective Pressure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479:1471-1481. [PMID: 33835090 PMCID: PMC8208434 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is focused on the surgical or chemical removal of biofilm. Antibiotics in isolation are typically ineffective against PJI. Bacteria survive after antibiotic administration because of antibiotic tolerance, resistance, and persistence that arise in the resident bacteria of a biofilm. Small-colony variants are typically slow-growing bacterial subpopulations that arise after antibiotic exposure and are associated with persistent and chronic infections such as PJI. The role of biofilm-mediated antibiotic tolerance in the emergence of antibiotic resistance remains poorly defined experimentally. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We asked: (1) Does prior antibiotic exposure affect how Staphylococcus aureus survives within a developing biofilm when exposed to an antibiotic that penetrates biofilm, like rifampicin? (2) Does exposure to an antibiotic with poor biofilm penetration, such as vancomycin, affect how S. aureus survives within a developing biofilm? (3) Do small-colony variants emerge from antibiotic-tolerant or -resistant bacteria in a S. aureus biofilm? METHODS We used a porous membrane as an in vitro implant model to grow luminescent S. aureus biofilms and simultaneously track microcolony expansion. We evaluated the impact of tolerance on the development of resistance by comparing rifampicin (an antibiotic that penetrates S. aureus biofilm) with vancomycin (an antibiotic that penetrates biofilm poorly). We performed viability counting after membrane dissociation to discriminate among tolerant, resistant, and persistent bacteria. Biofilm quantification and small-colony morphologies were confirmed using scanning electron microscopy. Because of experimental variability induced by the starting bacterial inoculum, relative changes were compared since absolute values may not have been statistically comparable. RESULTS Antibiotic-naïve S. aureus placed under the selective pressure of rifampicin initially survived within an emerging biofilm by using tolerance given that biofilm resident cell viability revealed 1.0 x 108 CFU, of which 7.5 x 106 CFU were attributed to the emergence of resistance and 9.3 x 107 CFU of which were attributed to the development of tolerance. Previous exposure of S. aureus to rifampicin obviated tolerance-mediate survival when rifampicin resistance was present, since the number of viable biofilm resident cells (9.5 x 109 CFU) nearly equaled the number of rifampicin-resistant bacteria (1.1 x 1010 CFU). Bacteria exposed to an antibiotic with poor biofilm penetration, like vancomycin, survive within an emerging biofilm by using tolerance as well because the biofilm resident cell viability for vancomycin-naïve (1.6 x 1010 CFU) and vancomycin-resistant (1.0 x 1010 CFU) S. aureus could not be accounted for by emergence of resistance. Adding rifampicin to vancomycin resulted in a nearly 500-fold reduction in vancomycin-tolerant bacteria from 1.5 x 1010 CFU to 3.3 x 107 CFU. Small-colony variant S. aureus emerged within the tolerant bacterial population within 24 hours of biofilm-penetrating antibiotic administration. Scanning electron microscopy before membrane dissociation confirmed the presence of small, uniform cells with biofilm-related microstructures when unexposed to rifampicin as well as large, misshapen, lysed cells with a small-colony variant morphology [29, 41, 42, 63] and a lack of biofilm-related microstructures when exposed to rifampicin. This visually confirmed the rapid emergence of small-colony variants within the sessile niche of a developing biofilm when exposed to an antibiotic that exerted selective pressure. CONCLUSION Tolerance explains why surgical and nonsurgical modalities that rely on antibiotics to "treat" residual microscopic biofilm may fail over time. The differential emergence of resistance based on biofilm penetration may explain why some suppressive antibiotic therapies that do not penetrate biofilm well may rely on bacterial control while limiting the emergence of resistance. However, this strategy fails to address the tolerant bacterial niche that harbors persistent bacteria with a small-colony variant morphology. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Our work establishes biofilm-mediated antibiotic tolerance as a neglected feature of bacterial communities that prevents the effective treatment of PJI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Manasherob
- School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Jake A. Mooney
- School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - David W. Lowenberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Paul L. Bollyky
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dauzere F, Clavert P, Ronde-Oustau C, Antoni M. Is systematic 1-stage exchange a valid attitude in chronic infection of total elbow arthroplasty? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2021; 107:102905. [PMID: 33789199 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgical treatment for chronic infection of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) generally involves 2-stage exchange. In the lower limb, 1-stage strategies are increasingly implemented, but few cases have been reported for the elbow. We present results in a preliminary series, with the aim of: (1) assessing control of infection in systematic 1-stage exchange for chronic TEA infection, (2) detailing clinical and radiological results, and (3) analyzing intra- and post-operative complications. HYPOTHESIS Systematic 1-stage exchange for chronic TEA prosthetic joint infection provides satisfactory control of infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS Seven non-selected patients were operated on by 1-stage exchange for chronic infection of TEA during the study period. Two died before the minimum 2 years' follow-up, from causes unrelated to the infection. Thus 5 patients (4 women, 1 man; mean age at surgery, 61 years [range: 48-69 years]) were included for analysis. At a minimum 2 years' follow-up, all underwent clinical examination and elbow X-ray. Infection was monomicrobial in 4 cases and polymicrobial in 1. Isolates comprised Staphylococcus aureus in 40% of cases (2/5), Staphylococcus epidermidis in 60% (3/5) and Staphylococcus Warneri in 20% (1/5). Three patients showed fistula. Three were under immunosuppression/immunomodulation treatment. RESULTS At a mean 40 months' follow-up (range: 24-60 months), 4 patients (80%) were free of infection and 1 showed signs of persistent infection. Mean range of flexion-extension was 81° (range: 60-95°) and pronation-supination 128° (range: 80-160°). Mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 75 points (range: 65-90). There were 2 intraoperative fractures and 1 neurologic deficit with partial regression. CONCLUSION One-stage exchange provided control of infection in 80% of cases, despite cutaneous fistulae or immunosuppression treatment. Clinical results and complications rate were similar to those reported for 2-stage exchange. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV; retrospective study without control group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Dauzere
- Service de Chirurgie du Membre Supérieur, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - Philippe Clavert
- Service de Chirurgie du Membre Supérieur, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - Cécile Ronde-Oustau
- Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique Septique, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Maxime Antoni
- Service de Chirurgie du Membre Supérieur, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg cedex, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bordure P, Marc C, Hubert L, Rony L. Does the retention of osseointegrated prosthetic implants during the surgical management of chronic infections following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) influence functional outcomes without impacting the efficacy of the infection treatment? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2021; 107:102906. [PMID: 33789197 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The gold standard (GS) for treating chronic infections following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a complete exchange of the prosthesis carried out in one or two stages. This surgical procedure, which may damage the bone stock, can result in poor functional outcomes due to intraoperative complications. The purpose of this study was to compare the GS to a surgical technique that retained osseointegrated implants: the partial one-stage exchange. HYPOTHESIS Partial one-stage exchange was effective in treating chronic infections after RTSA (no recurrent infection) and resulted in better functional outcomes than the GS. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective single-center study included 18 patients with chronic infection after a primary RTSA. Two treatments were compared in a non-randomized fashion. The first included 11 patients who underwent a partial one-stage exchange with implant retention in case of macroscopic osseointegration. The second included seven patients who were treated with the GS: six patients with a complete one-stage exchange and one patient with a two-stage surgical approach. The absence of recurrent infection and functional outcomes were assessed after a minimum of two years. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences in treatment efficacy between the two strategies: 91% vs. 100%, respectively. The partial one-stage exchange resulted in a significantly improved shoulder function compared to the GS with postoperative Constant scores of 55±14.58 vs. 44±14.45, respectively (p=.03). In the partial one-stage exchange group, there was a significantly improved shoulder function with a preoperative Constant score of 40 [28-55]±9.04 preoperatively vs. 55 [25-75]±14.58 postoperatively (p=.01). The GS treatment did not significantly improve the postoperative function (p=.09). DISCUSSION Partial one-stage exchange does not compromise treatment efficacy of chronic infections after RTSA. This technique resulted in better shoulder function than a conventional GS-type management. A study with greater statistical power is required. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III; clinical series, retrospective, single-center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Bordure
- Orthopaedic & Traumatologic Surgery Department, University hospital, 4, rue Larrey, Angers, France.
| | - Clément Marc
- Orthopaedic & Traumatologic Surgery Department, University hospital, 4, rue Larrey, Angers, France
| | - Laurent Hubert
- Orthopaedic & Traumatologic Surgery Department, University hospital, 4, rue Larrey, Angers, France
| | - Louis Rony
- Orthopaedic & Traumatologic Surgery Department, University hospital, 4, rue Larrey, Angers, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kim SC, Kim IS, Jang MC, Yoo JC. Complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a concise review. Clin Shoulder Elb 2021; 24:42-52. [PMID: 33652512 PMCID: PMC7943379 DOI: 10.5397/cise.2021.00066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is an ideal treatment for glenohumeral dysfunction due to cuff tear arthropathy. As the number of patients treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty is increasing, the incidence of complications after this procedure also is increasing. The rate of complications in reverse shoulder arthroplasty was reported to be 15%-24%. Recently, the following complications have been reported in order of frequency: periprosthetic infection, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, neurologic injury, scapular notching, acromion or scapular spine fracture, and aseptic loosening of prosthesis. However, the overall complication rate has varied across studies because of different prosthesis used, improvement of implant and surgical skills, and different definitions of complications. Some authors included complications that affect the clinical outcomes of the surgery, while others reported minor complications that do not affect the clinical outcomes such as minor reversible neurologic deficit or minimal scapular notching. This review article summarizes the processes related to diagnosis and treatment of complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the aim of helping clinicians reduce complications and perform appropriate procedures if/when complications occur.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Cheol Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Il Su Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Chang Jang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Chul Yoo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kunutsor SK, Barrett MC, Whitehouse MR, Blom AW. Clinical Effectiveness of Treatment Strategies for Prosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Ankle Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg 2021; 59:367-372. [PMID: 32131004 DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total ankle replacement (TAR) is a challenging complication, which often requires debridement and implant retention (DAIR) with or without polyethylene exchange, revision surgery, implantation of a cement spacer, conversion to arthrodesis, or even amputation. The optimum treatment for ankle PJI is not well established. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical effectiveness of various treatment strategies for infected ankle prostheses. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to December 2018 for studies evaluating the impact of treatment in patient populations with infected ankle prostheses following TAR. Binary data were pooled after arcsine transformation. Six citations comprising 17 observational design comparisons were included. The reinfection rates (95% confidence intervals) for DAIR with or without polyethylene exchange, 1-stage revision, 2-stage revision, cement spacer, and arthrodesis were 39.8% (24.4 to 56.1), 0.0% (0.0 to 78.7), 0.0% (0.0 to 8.5), 0.2% (0.0 to 17.9), and 13.6% (0.0 to 45.8), respectively. Rates of amputation for DAIR with or without polyethylene exchange and cement spacer were 5.6% (0.0 to 16.9) and 22.2% (6.3 to 54.7), respectively. Measures of function, pain, and satisfaction could not be compared because of limited data. One- and 2-stage revision strategies seem to be associated with the lowest reinfection rates, but these findings are based on limited data. Arthrodesis and DAIR with or without polyethylene exchange appear to be commonly used in treating infected ankle prosthesis, but are associated with poor infection control. Clear gaps exist in the literature, and further research is warranted to evaluate treatment strategies for infected ankle prosthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Setor K Kunutsor
- Research Fellow, National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Research Fellow, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Learning & Research Building (Level 1), Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
| | - Matthew C Barrett
- Medical Student, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Michael R Whitehouse
- Reader, National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Reader, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Learning & Research Building (Level 1), Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Ashley W Blom
- Professor, National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Professor, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Learning & Research Building (Level 1), Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Clinical Outcome of Two-Stage Revision after Periprosthetic Shoulder Infection. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10020218. [PMID: 33435442 PMCID: PMC7826686 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Revised: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Periprosthetic shoulder infections are devastating complications after shoulder arthroplasty. A potential treatment concept is a two-stage prosthesis exchange. Data are sparse in terms of clinical outcome, including infection-free survival and patient satisfaction after this procedure. In the present study, we investigated recurrence of infection, revision-free survivorship and clinical outcome following two-stage revision due to periprosthetic shoulder infection. Furthermore, reasons for poor outcome were analyzed. Methods: Sixteen patients undergoing two-stage revision after shoulder joint infection were retrospectively identified. Recurrence of infection was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier survival curve. Clinical outcome was quantified with subjective shoulder value (SSV), “quick” Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (qDASH) and Rowe score. Range of motion (ROM) was measured pre- and postoperatively. Postoperative scores and ROM were compared in a subgroup analysis according to different reimplanted prosthesis types. Results: The reinfection-free implant survival was 81% after one year and at final follow-up (FU; mean of 33.2 months). The overall revision-free survival amounted to 56% after one year and at final FU. Patients who received reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) as part of reimplantation had less disability and long-term complications. This group demonstrated better subjective stability and function compared to patients revised to megaprostheses or large-head hemiarthroplasties. Conclusions: Two-stage revision following periprosthetic joint infection of the shoulder allows appropriate infection control in the majority of patients. However, the overall complications and revision rates due to mechanical failure or reinfection are high. Reimplantation of RSA seem superior to alternative prosthesis models in terms of function and patient satisfaction. Therefore, bone-saving surgery and reconstruction of the glenoid may increase the likelihood of reimplantation of RSA and potentially improve outcome in the case of infection-related two-stage revision of the shoulder.
Collapse
|
13
|
Alessio-Mazzola M, Repetto I, Russo A, Clemente A, Ventura N, Formica M, Burastero G, Felli L. Permanent Spacers Are a Reliable Solution for Peri-prosthetic Shoulder Infection: A Systematic Review. HSS J 2020; 16:272-279. [PMID: 33082722 PMCID: PMC7534885 DOI: 10.1007/s11420-020-09755-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peri-prosthetic shoulder infection (PSI), a highly disabling complication of shoulder arthroplasty, often requires additional surgery and prolonged antibiotic therapy. Of strategies proposed to manage this devastating condition, the use of cement spacers, perhaps even as a definitive treatment, is debated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We sought to systematically review the literature on antibiotic-loaded cement spacers as a viable, perhaps definitive, treatment for PSI, evaluating the eradication rates, mechanical reliability, and functional results related to its use. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of studies published from January 1, 1980, through September 1, 2019. Following the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, we searched for studies reporting functional and clinical outcomes in patients with PSI treated with a permanent spacer of the shoulder. Two independent reviewers searched eight databases, as well as reference lists of the retrieved articles. RESULTS After exclusion criteria were applied, 12 studies were included, involving a total of 143 patients. The mean age was 65.8 years; the mean follow-up was 37.4 months. A total of 133 patients (93%) were free from infection at latest follow-up. The mean post-operative active elevation of the shoulder ranged from 48.6 to 90°, the mean abduction ranged from 51 to 75°, and external rotation ranged from 3.6 to 29°. The mean Constant-Murley score ranged from 20.6 to 42 points (out of 100, from worst to best). CONCLUSION The use of a permanent cement spacer is a reliable solution to PSI in low-demand, older patients with comorbidities, a population in whom it is desirable to avoid additional surgery. Our review found a high rate of infection eradication and moderate-to-good objective and subjective results. However, the overall level of evidence of included studies was very low, and higher-quality studies are needed to clarify the role of permanent spacers in the treatment of PSI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Alessio-Mazzola
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 2° piano, 16132 Genoa, Italy ,Orthopedic Clinic, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ilaria Repetto
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 2° piano, 16132 Genoa, Italy ,Orthopedic Clinic, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 2° piano, 16132 Genoa, Italy ,Orthopedic Clinic, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Antonio Clemente
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 2° piano, 16132 Genoa, Italy ,Orthopedic Clinic, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Niccolò Ventura
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 2° piano, 16132 Genoa, Italy ,Orthopedic Clinic, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Formica
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 2° piano, 16132 Genoa, Italy ,Orthopedic Clinic, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giorgio Burastero
- Joint Replacement Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Corona, Pietra Ligure, Italy
| | - Lamberto Felli
- grid.5606.50000 0001 2151 3065Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 2° piano, 16132 Genoa, Italy ,Orthopedic Clinic, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fossati C, Vitale M, Forin Valvecchi T, Gualtierotti R, Randelli PS. Management of Painful Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review. Pain Ther 2020; 9:427-439. [PMID: 32676775 PMCID: PMC7648774 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-020-00186-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the recent advances in surgical techniques, the percentage of painful shoulder arthroplasties is still high (more than 10%). The causes of residual pain after shoulder arthroplasty, and the resulting treatment solutions, are many and different. The most common complications of shoulder prosthesis are infections, aseptic loosening, modular components disassembling, metal hypersensitivity, and instability. There are also implant-related complications such as glenoid wear in hemiarthroplasty, rotator cuff tear in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty, scapular notching, and acromion fracture in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Several of these complications can be avoided with a careful selection of the implants, a proper surgical technique and a precise implant positioning. The execution of a more accurate preoperative planning and the possible use of patient-specific implants are expected to translate into better clinical results in the future. We provide the reader with recent evidence on the causes and therapeutic options of this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Fossati
- 1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy. .,Laboratorio di Biomeccanica Applicata, Dipartimento Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| | - Marianna Vitale
- 1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Laboratorio di Biomeccanica Applicata, Dipartimento Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Forin Valvecchi
- 1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Laboratorio di Biomeccanica Applicata, Dipartimento Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Gualtierotti
- Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia medico-chirurgica e dei trapianti, Università degli studi di Milano, via Pace 9, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro S Randelli
- 1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Laboratorio di Biomeccanica Applicata, Dipartimento Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Li C, Ojeda-Thies C, Xu C, Trampuz A. Meta-analysis in periprosthetic joint infection: a global bibliometric analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15:251. [PMID: 32650802 PMCID: PMC7350679 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01757-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most serious complication of joint replacement surgery. Further comorbidities include bedsore, deep vein thrombosis, reinfection, or even death. An increasing number of researchers are focusing on this challenging complication. The aim of the present study was to estimate global PJI research based on bibliometrics from meta-analysis studies. Methods A database search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Relevant studies were assessed using the bibliometric analysis. Results A total of 117 articles were included. The most relevant literature on PJI was found on Scopus. China made the highest contributions to global research, followed by the USA and the UK. The institution with the most contributions was the University of Bristol. The journal with the highest number of publications was The Journal of Arthroplasty, whereas the Journal of Clinical Medicine had the shortest acceptance time. Furthermore, the top three frequently used databases were Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane. The most frequent number of authors in meta-analysis studies was four. Most studies focused on the periprosthetic hip and knee. The alpha-defensin diagnostic test, preventive measures on antibiotics use, and risk factors of intra-articular steroid injections were the most popular topic in recent years. Conclusion Based on the results of the present study, we found that there was no single database that covered all relevant articles; the optimal method for bibliometric analysis is a combination of databases. The most popular research topics on PJI focused on alpha-defensin, antibiotic use, risk factors of intra-articular steroid injections, and the location of prosthetic hip and knee infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Li
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Charitéplatz 1, D-10117, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Chi Xu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Andrej Trampuz
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Charitéplatz 1, D-10117, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
李 宇, 张 豪, 王 立, 郑 秋, 肖 世, 杨 洪. [Two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for treating postoperative deep infection after internal fixation of proximal humeral fracture]. ZHONGGUO XIU FU CHONG JIAN WAI KE ZA ZHI = ZHONGGUO XIUFU CHONGJIAN WAIKE ZAZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF REPARATIVE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 2020; 34:184-189. [PMID: 32030949 PMCID: PMC8171974 DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201907079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Revised: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize the effectiveness of two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for treating postoperative deep infection after internal fixation of the proximal humeral fracture. METHODS Between June 2014 and January 2018, 17 patients with deep infection and humeral head necrosis or bone nonunion after internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures were treated. There were 8 males and 9 females, aged from 52 to 78 years (mean, 63.8 years). The infection occurred at 19-66 months after the initial internal fixation (mean, 34.8 months). Microbial culture of joint fluid was positive in 14 cases and negative in 3 cases. The preoperative Constant score, American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were 36.41±8.65, 31.06±7.43, and 7.29±0.99, respectively. The preoperative ranges of forward flexion, abduction, external rotation were (45.88±12.46), (42.18±12.31), and (16.76±4.92)°, respectively. The preoperative range of internal rotation was buttock in 9 cases, lumbosacral joint in 3 cases, L 3 in 5 cases. At the first-stage surgery, the thorough debridement was done and the antibiotic-impregnated bone cement spacer was placed after the removal of internal fixation. After the infections disappeared, the two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was performed. The mean interval between the two procedures was 4.2 months (range, 3.0-6.5 months). RESULTS All the incisions healed primarily and no complications such as recurrent infection or vascular nerve injury occurred. All patients were followed up 15-32 months (mean, 22.0 months). At last follow-up, the ranges of forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation were (109.00±23.66), (98.53±16.92), (41.41±6.82)°, respectively; and the range of internal rotation was lumbosacral joint in 5 cases, L 3 in 8 cases, T 12 in 4 cases. The range of motion of shoulder joints at last follow-up was significant improved when compared with the preoperative range of motion ( P<0.05). The Constant score (64.88±8.70), ASES score (65.18±8.10), and VAS score (2.94±1.25) were significantly superior to the preoperative scores ( P<0.05). X-ray films showed that no prosthesis loosening occurred. CONCLUSION Two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment for the postoperative deep infection after internal fixation of the proximal humeral fracture, which has advantages of low risk of infection recurrence, good shoulder function, and satisfactory short-term effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- 宇 李
- 西南医科大学附属医院骨与关节外科(四川泸州 646000)Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou Sichuan, 646000, P.R.China
| | - 豪 张
- 西南医科大学附属医院骨与关节外科(四川泸州 646000)Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou Sichuan, 646000, P.R.China
| | - 立志 王
- 西南医科大学附属医院骨与关节外科(四川泸州 646000)Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou Sichuan, 646000, P.R.China
| | - 秋 郑
- 西南医科大学附属医院骨与关节外科(四川泸州 646000)Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou Sichuan, 646000, P.R.China
| | - 世卓 肖
- 西南医科大学附属医院骨与关节外科(四川泸州 646000)Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou Sichuan, 646000, P.R.China
| | - 洪彬 杨
- 西南医科大学附属医院骨与关节外科(四川泸州 646000)Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou Sichuan, 646000, P.R.China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kunutsor SK, Beswick AD, Whitehouse MR, Blom AW. One- and two-stage surgical revision of infected elbow prostheses following total joint replacement: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20:467. [PMID: 31640638 PMCID: PMC6806568 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2848-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a challenging complication of total elbow replacement (TER). Potential surgical treatments include one- or two-stage revision; however, the best treatment for elbow PJI is not clearly defined. We conducted a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to compare the clinical effectiveness of one- and two-stage revision surgery for elbow PJI using re-infection (recurrent and new infections) rates; mortality; clinical measures of function, pain, and satisfaction; and non-infection related adverse events. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library were searched up to June 2019 to identify observational cohort studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that had recruited patients with elbow PJI following TER and treated with one- or two-stage revision. Of 96 retrieved articles, 2 one-stage and 6 two-stage revision studies were eligible. No RCT was identified. Arcsine transformation was used in estimating rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Staphylococcus aureus was the most common causative organism for PJI of the elbow (24 of 71 elbow PJIs). The re-infection rate (95% CI) for one-stage (7 elbows) ranged from 0.0% (0.0–79.3) to 16.7% (3.0–56.4) and that for two-stage revision (87 elbows) from 0.0% (0.0–49.0) to 20.0% (3.6–62.4). Non-infection related adverse event rate for one-stage (based on a single study) was 16.7% (3.0–56.4) and that for two-stage ranged from 11.8% (4.7–26.6) to 20.0% (3.6–62.4). There were no mortality events recorded following one- or two-stage revision surgery and postoperative clinical measures of function, pain, and satisfaction could not be effectively compared because of limited data. Conclusions No strong conclusions can be drawn because of limited data. The one-stage revision may be potentially at least as clinically effective as two-stage revision, but further data is needed. There are clear gaps in the existing literature and studies are urgently warranted to assess the clinical effectiveness of one- and two-stage revision strategies for PJI following TER. Systematic review registration PROSPERO 2018: CRD42018118002.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Setor K Kunutsor
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. .,Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Learning & Research Building (Level 1), Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
| | - Andrew D Beswick
- Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Learning & Research Building (Level 1), Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Michael R Whitehouse
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Learning & Research Building (Level 1), Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Ashley W Blom
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Learning & Research Building (Level 1), Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| |
Collapse
|