1
|
Bao YQ, Yu TH, Huang W, Mao QF, Tu GJ, Li B, Yi A, Li JG, Rao J, Zhang HW, Jiang CL. Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy post breast-conserving surgery: clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and cosmetic outcomes in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer 2024; 31:726-734. [PMID: 38705942 PMCID: PMC11194202 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-024-01588-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) is an innovative technique delivering a higher dose to the tumor bed while irradiating the entire breast. This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes, adverse effects, and cosmetic results of SIB-IMRT following breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 308 patients with stage 0-III breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery and SIB-IMRT from January 2016 to December 2020. The prescribed doses included 1.85 Gy/27 fractions to the whole breast and 2.22 Gy/27 fractions or 2.20 Gy/27 fractions to the tumor bed. Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), local-regional control (LRC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), acute and late toxicities, and cosmetic outcomes. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 36 months. The 3-year OS, LRC, and DMFS rates were 100%, 99.6%, and 99.2%, respectively. Five patients (1.8%) experienced local recurrence or distant metastasis, and one patient succumbed to distant metastasis. The most common acute toxicity was grade 1-2 skin reactions (91.6%). The most common late toxicity was grade 0-1 skin and subcutaneous tissue reactions (96.7%). Five patients (1.8%) developed grade 1-2 upper limb lymphedema, and three patients (1.1%) had grade 1 radiation pneumonitis. Among the 262 patients evaluated for cosmetic outcomes at least 2 years post-radiotherapy, 96.9% achieved excellent or good results, while 3.1% had fair or poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS SIB-IMRT after breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients demonstrated excellent clinical efficacy, mild acute and late toxicities, and satisfactory cosmetic outcomes in our study. SIB-IMRT appears to be a feasible and effective option for breast cancer patients suitable for breast-conserving surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong-Qiang Bao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Cancer Institute, Nanchang, 330029, Jiangxi, China
- Medical Oncology, Nanchang People's Hospital, Nanchang People's Hospital Affiliated of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, 330009, Jiangxi, China
| | - Teng-Hua Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Cancer Institute, Nanchang, 330029, Jiangxi, China
| | - Wei Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China
| | - Qing-Feng Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Cancer Institute, Nanchang, 330029, Jiangxi, China
| | - Gan-Jie Tu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Cancer Institute, Nanchang, 330029, Jiangxi, China
| | - Bin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Cancer Institute, Nanchang, 330029, Jiangxi, China
| | - An Yi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Cancer Institute, Nanchang, 330029, Jiangxi, China
| | - Jin-Gao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Cancer Institute, Nanchang, 330029, Jiangxi, China
| | - Jun Rao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Cancer Institute, Nanchang, 330029, Jiangxi, China.
| | - Huai-Wen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Cancer Institute, Nanchang, 330029, Jiangxi, China.
| | - Chun-Ling Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Cancer Institute, Nanchang, 330029, Jiangxi, China.
- Key Laboratory of Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330029, Jiangxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ji MC, Li ZJ, Li K, Wang YX, Yang B, Lv LL, Su Y, Zhang ZW, Huo ZC, Qi Q, Lu YC, Cui ZQ, Liu YB. Dosimetric risk factors for radiation esophagitis in patients with breast cancer following regional nodal radiation. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12:2995-3003. [PMID: 38898857 PMCID: PMC11185373 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i17.2995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation esophagitis (RE) is one of the most common clinical symptoms of regi-onal lymph node radiotherapy for breast cancer. However, there are fewer studies focusing on RE caused by hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT). AIM To analyze the clinical and dosimetric factors that contribute to the development of RE in patients with breast cancer treated with HFRT of regional lymph nodes. METHODS Between January and December 2022, we retrospectively analysed 64 patients with breast cancer who met our inclusion criteria underwent regional nodal intensity-modulated radiotherapy at a radiotherapy dose of 43.5 Gy/15F. RESULTS Of the 64 patients in this study, 24 (37.5%) did not develop RE, 29 (45.3%) developed grade 1 RE (G1RE), 11 (17.2%) developed grade 2 RE (G2RE), and none developed grade 3 RE or higher. Our univariable logistic regression analysis found G2RE to be significantly correlated with the maximum dose, mean dose, relative volume 20-40, and absolute volume (AV) 20-40. Our stepwise linear regression analyses found AV30 and AV35 to be significantly associated with G2RE (P < 0.001). The optimal threshold for AV30 was 2.39 mL [area under the curve (AUC): 0.996; sensitivity: 90.9%; specificity: 91.1%]. The optimal threshold for AV35 was 0.71 mL (AUC: 0.932; sensitivity: 90.9%; specificity: 83.9%). CONCLUSION AV30 and AV35 were significantly associated with G2RE. The thresholds for AV30 and AV35 should be limited to 2.39 mL and 0.71 mL, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei-Chen Ji
- Oncology Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of En-gineering, Handan 056002, Hebei Province, China
| | - Zhi-Jia Li
- Oncology Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of En-gineering, Handan 056002, Hebei Province, China
| | - Ke Li
- Oncology Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of En-gineering, Handan 056002, Hebei Province, China
| | - Yun-Xiao Wang
- Oncology Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of En-gineering, Handan 056002, Hebei Province, China
| | - Bo Yang
- Oncology Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of En-gineering, Handan 056002, Hebei Province, China
| | - Lin-Lin Lv
- Oncology Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of En-gineering, Handan 056002, Hebei Province, China
| | - Ying Su
- Oncology Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of En-gineering, Handan 056002, Hebei Province, China
| | - Zhi-Wei Zhang
- Oncology Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of En-gineering, Handan 056002, Hebei Province, China
| | - Zhong-Chao Huo
- Oncology Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of En-gineering, Handan 056002, Hebei Province, China
| | - Qing Qi
- Oncology Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of En-gineering, Handan 056002, Hebei Province, China
| | - Yong-Chang Lu
- General Surgery Department, Handan First Hospital, Handan 056002, Hebei Province, China
| | - Zhi-Qiang Cui
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056002, Hebei Province, China
| | - Yan-Bao Liu
- School of Clinical Medicine, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056002, Hebei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fairweather D, Taylor RM, Simões R. Choosing the right questions - A systematic review of patient reported outcome measures used in radiotherapy and proton beam therapy. Radiother Oncol 2024; 191:110071. [PMID: 38142933 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
The implementation of PROMs into clinical practice has been shown to improve quality of care. This systematic review aims to identify which PROMs are suitable for implementation within routine clinical practice in a radiotherapy or PBT service.The bibliographic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and EMCARE were searched. Articles published between 1st January 2008 to 1st June 2023, that reported PROMs being utilised as an outcome measure were included. Inclusion criteria also included being written in English, involving human patients, aged 16 and above, receiving external beam radiotherapy or PBT for six defined tumour sites. PROMs identified within the included articles were subjected to quality assessment using the COSMIN reporting guidelines. Results are reported as per PRISMA guidelines. A total of 268 studies were identified in the search, of which 52 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The use of 39 different PROMs was reported. The PROMs identified were mostly tumour or site-specific quality of life (n = 23) measures but also included generic cancer (n = 3), health-related quality-of-life (n = 6), and symptom specific (n = 7) measures.None of the PROMs identified received a high GRADE score for good content. There were 13 PROMs that received a moderate GRADE score. The remaining PROMs either had limited evidence of development and validation within the patient cohorts investigated, or lacked relevance or comprehensiveness needed for routine PROMs collection in a radiotherapy or PBT service.This review highlights that there are a wide variety of PROMs being utilised within radiotherapy research, but most lack specificity to radiotherapy side-effects. There is a risk that by using non-specific PROMs in clinical practice, patients might not receive the supportive care that they need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Fairweather
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Rachel M Taylor
- Centre for Nurse, Midwife and Allied Health Profession Led Research (CNMAR), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rita Simões
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang DQ, Zhang N, Dong LH, Zhong YH, Wu HF, Zhong QZ, Jin J, Hou XR, Jing H, Tang Y, Hu C, Song YW, Liu YP, Qi SN, Tang Y, Lu NN, Chen B, Zhai YR, Zhang WW, Li N, Fang H, Li YX, Wang SL. Dose-Volume Predictors for Radiation Esophagitis in Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Hypofractionated Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:186-197. [PMID: 37001764 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.03.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our objective was to assess the incidence and dose-volume predictors of radiation esophagitis (RE) in patients with breast cancer undergoing hypofractionated regional nodal irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible patients who received intensity modulated radiation therapy (RT) at the chest wall, the supraclavicular/infraclavicular fossa, level II axilla, and/or the internal mammary chain after mastectomy were included. The prescribed dose was 43.5 Gy in 15 fractions. RE was evaluated weekly during RT and at 1 and 2 weeks, followed by 3 and 6 months after RT, and was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. The esophagus was contoured from the lower border level of the cricoid cartilage to the lower margin of the aortic arch. Esophageal total volume, mean dose, maximum dose, and the relative volumes (RV) and absolute volumes (AV) receiving at least 5 to 45 Gy by 5-Gy increments (RV5-RV45 and AV5-AV45) were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for RE, and receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained to identify the thresholds of esophageal dosimetric parameters. RESULTS In total, 298 patients were included between May 8, 2020, and January 5, 2022 (minimum post-RT follow-up: 6 months). Grade 2 and 3 RE incidence was 40.9% (122/298) and 0.3% (1/298), respectively. No grade 4 or 5 RE was observed. Esophageal RV20-RV40 and AV35-AV40 were significantly associated with the risk of grade ≥2 RE after adjusting for tumor laterality and internal mammary nodal irradiation. RV25 and AV35 were optimum dose-volume predictors for grade ≥2 RE at thresholds 20% for RV25 (35.9% vs 60.9%; P = .04) and 0.27 mL for AV35 (31.0% vs 54.6%; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS RE is common in patients with breast cancer undergoing hypofractionated regional nodal irradiation. Maintaining the upper esophageal V25 at <20% and V35 at <0.27 mL may decrease the risk of RE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan-Qiong Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Na Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Li-Hua Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Ya-Hua Zhong
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Wuhan, China
| | - Hong-Fen Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Jilin Province, Changchun, China
| | - Qiu-Zi Zhong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Hospital, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xiao-Rong Hou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Jing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Hu
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yong-Wen Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yue-Ping Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shu-Nan Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ning-Ning Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yi-Rui Zhai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wen-Wen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| | - Ye-Xiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| | - Shu-Lian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xie Y, Wang Q, Hu T, Chen R, Wang J, Chang H, Cheng J. Risk Factors Related to Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer Patients After Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:738851. [PMID: 34912704 PMCID: PMC8667470 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.738851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) is the most common acute response after adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer patients and negatively affects patients’ quality of life. Some studies have reported several risk factors that can predict breast cancer patients who are at a high risk of ARD. This study aimed to identify patient- and treatment-related risk factors associated with ARD. Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang literature databases were searched for studies exploring the risk factors in breast cancer patients. The pooled effect sizes, relative risks (RRs), and 95% CIs were calculated using the random-effects model. Potential heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses by study design, ARD evaluation scale, and regions were also performed. Results A total of 38 studies composed of 15,623 breast cancer patients were included in the analysis. Of the seven available patient-related risk factors, four factors were significantly associated with ARD: body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.06–1.16, I2 = 57.1%), large breast volume (RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01–1.03, I2 = 93.2%), smoking habits (RR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.24–2.34, I2 = 50.7%), and diabetes (RR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.53–3.27, I2 = 0%). Of the seven treatment-related risk factors, we found that hypofractionated radiotherapy reduced the risk of ARD in patients with breast cancer compared with that in conventional fractionated radiotherapy (RR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.19–0.43, I2 = 84.5%). Sequential boost and bolus use was significantly associated with ARD (boost, RR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.34–2.72, I2 = 92.5%; bolus, RR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.82–4.76, I2 = 23.8%). However, chemotherapy regimen (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.95–1.45, I2 = 57.2%), hormone therapy (RR = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.94–1.93, I2 = 77.1%), trastuzumab therapy (RR = 1.56, 95% CI = 0.18–1.76, I2 = 91.9%), and nodal irradiation (RR = 1.57, 95% CI = 0.98–2.53, I2 = 72.5%) were not correlated with ARD. Sensitivity analysis results showed that BMI was consistently associated with ARD, while smoking, breast volume, and boost administration were associated with ARD depending on study design, country of study, and toxicity evaluation scale used. Hypofractionation was consistently shown as protective. The differences between study design, toxicity evaluation scale, and regions might explain a little of the sources of heterogeneity. Conclusion The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 was a significant predictor of ARD and that hypofractionation was consistently protective. Depending on country of study, study design, and toxicity scale used, breast volume, smoking habit, diabetes, and sequential boost and bolus use were also predictive of ARD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxiu Xie
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Qiong Wang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ting Hu
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Renwang Chen
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jue Wang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Haiyan Chang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jing Cheng
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Forster T, Hommertgen A, Häfner MF, Arians N, König L, Harrabi SB, Schlampp I, Köhler C, Meixner E, Heinrich V, Weidner N, Hüsing J, Sohn C, Heil J, Golatta M, Hof H, Krug D, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. Quality of life after simultaneously integrated boost with intensity-modulated versus conventional radiotherapy with sequential boost for adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: 2-year results of the multicenter randomized IMRT-MC2 trial. Radiother Oncol 2021; 163:165-176. [PMID: 34480960 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We recently published 2-year results of the prospective, randomized IMRT-MC2 trial, showing non-inferior local control and cosmesis in breast cancer patients after conventionally fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneously integrated boost (IMRT-SIB), compared to 3D-conformal radiotherapy with sequential boost (3D-CRT-seqB). Here, we report on 2-year quality of life results. PATIENTS AND METHODS 502 patients were enrolled and randomized to IMRT-SIB (50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions with a 64.4 Gy SIB to the tumor bed) or to 3D-CRT-seqB (50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions, followed by a sequential boost of 16 Gy in 2 Gy fractions). For quality of life (QoL) assessment, patients completed the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires at baseline, 6 weeks and 2 years after radiotherapy. RESULTS Significant differences between treatment arms were seen 6 weeks after radiotherapy for pain (22.3 points for IMRT vs. 27.0 points for 3D-CRT-seqB; p = 0.033) and arm symptoms (18.1 points for IMRT vs. 23.6 points for 3D-CRT-seqB; p = 0.013), both favoring IMRT-SIB. Compared to baseline values, both arms showed significant improvement in global score (IMRT: p = 0.009; 3D-CRT: p = 0.001) after 2 years, with slight deterioration on the role (IMRT: p = 0.008; 3-D-CRT: p = 0.001) and social functioning (IMRT: p = 0.013, 3D-CRT: p = 0.001) as well as the future perspectives scale (IMRT: p = 0.003; 3D-CRT: p = 0.0034). CONCLUSION This is the first randomized phase III trial demonstrating that IMRT-SIB was associated with slightly superior QoL compared to 3-D-CRT-seqB. These findings further support the clinical implementation of SIB in adjuvant breast cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Adriane Hommertgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Felix Häfner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nathalie Arians
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Ben Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ingmar Schlampp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clara Köhler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vanessa Heinrich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Nicola Weidner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Johannes Hüsing
- Division of Biostatistics, Coordination Centre for Clinical Trials, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof Sohn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Golatta
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Holger Hof
- Strahlentherapie Rhein-Pfalz, Neustadt, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dzul S, Ninia J, Jang H, Kim S, Dominello M. Predictors of Acute Radiation Dermatitis and Esophagitis in African American Patients Receiving Whole Breast Radiotherapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 12:52-59. [PMID: 34710629 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES Adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy following breast conserving surgery is standard of care in the management of early stage breast cancer. Two of the most common acute toxicities of breast radiotherapy are radiation esophagitis (RE) and radiation dermatitis (RD). African Americans are at higher risk for experiencing treatment-related toxicity and are often under-represented in clinical trials. METHODS An institutional database was developed to include all African American patients with history of breast cancer or DCIS undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy at a single institution from 2013-2019. Records were reviewed to identify patient age, BMI, radiation dose, prone vs supine position, inclusion of boost, and inclusion of regional nodal irradiation (RNI). Radiation treatment plans were reviewed to identify breast size as well as dosimetric parameters to the breast and esophagus. Medical records were reviewed to identify which patients were prescribed silvadene or mylanta-lidocaine during or immediately following their course of radiotherapy which was used as a surrogate for Grade 2 or higher dermatitis (G2RD) and esophagitis (G2RE), respectively. RESULTS 272 patients were included in the final analysis. On univariable analysis, morbidly obese patients were more likely to develop G2RD while hypofractionated radiotherapy was associated with lower rates of G2RD. On multivariable analysis, increasing breast volume was associated with higher rates of G2RD. For the subset of patients receiving RNI, 19% of patients experienced G2RE with the best predictor on multivariable analysis being Dmean to the esophagus. CONCLUSION Radiation dermatitis and esophagitis are common toxicities in African American patients undergoing adjuvant breast radiotherapy. Breast size, irrespective of patient's BMI, was associated with worse rate of dermatitis. Prone position and hypofractionated radiation reduced rates of G2RD. Dmean to the esophagus was the dosimetric parameter best correlating with G2RE. These results may be used to help select patients are at higher risk for G2 or higher toxicity during radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Dzul
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI.
| | - James Ninia
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Two-year toxicity of simultaneous integrated boost in hypofractionated prone breast cancer irradiation: Comparison with sequential boost in a randomized trial. Radiother Oncol 2021; 158:62-66. [PMID: 33617910 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) leads to less acute toxicity. Less is known for late toxicity due to SIB. In this first and only randomized trial, two-years toxicity is analysed. MATERIALS AND METHODS Physician-assessed toxicity, using the LENT SOMA scale, and photographs, analysed with the BCCT.core software, was examined for 150 patients, randomized between SIB and sequential boost (SEB). RESULTS Differences in physician-assessed two-years toxicity and photographic analysis between SIB and SEB are very small and not significant. CONCLUSION There is no indication that a SIB leads to an excess in toxicity or worse cosmetic outcome at 2 years.
Collapse
|
9
|
Correlation between toxicity and dosimetric parameters for adjuvant intensity modulated radiation therapy of breast cancer: a prospective study. Sci Rep 2021; 11:3626. [PMID: 33574446 PMCID: PMC7878810 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83159-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
ORCID: 0000–0001-6019–7309. In the treatment of breast cancer, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reportedly reduces the high-dose irradiation of at-risk organs and decreases the frequency of adverse events (AEs). Comparisons with conventional radiotherapy have shown that IMRT is associated with lower frequencies of acute and late-onset AEs. Here, we extended a prospective, observational, single-center study of the safety of IMRT to a second investigating center. Patients scheduled for adjuvant IMRT after partial or total mastectomy were given a dose of 50 Gy (25 fractions of 2 Gy over 5 weeks), with a simultaneous integrated boost in patients having undergone conservative surgery. 300 patients were included in the study, and 288 were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 2.1 years. The 2-year disease-free survival rate [95% CI] was 93.4% [89.2–96.0%]. Most AEs were mild. The most common AEs were skin-related—mainly radiodermatitis [in 266 patients (92.4%)] and hyperpigmentation (in 178 (61.8%)). 35% and 6% of the patients presented with grade 2 acute skin and esophageal toxicity, respectively. Only 4 patients presented with a grade 3 event (radiodermatitis). Smoking (odds ratio) [95% CI] = 2.10 [1.14–3.87]; p = 0.017), no prior chemotherapy (0.52 [0.27–0.98]; p = 0.044), and D98% for subclavicular skin (1.030 [1.001–1.061]; p = 0.045) were associated with grade ≥ 2 acute AEs. In a univariate analysis, the mean dose, (p < 0.0001), D2% (p < 0.0001), D50% (p = 0.037), D95% (p = 0.0005), D98% (p = 0.0007), V30Gy (p < 0.0001), and V45Gy (p = 0.0001) were significantly associated with grade ≥ 1 acute esophageal AEs. In a multivariate analysis, D95% for the skin (p < 0.001), D98% for the subclavicular skin and low D95% for the internal mammary lymph nodes were associated with grade ≥ 1 medium-term AEs. The safety profile of adjuvant IMRT after partial or total mastectomy is influenced by dosimetric parameters. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02281149.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bataille B, Raoudha B, Le Tinier F, Basson L, Escande A, Langin H, Tresch E, Crop F, Darloy F, Carlier D, Lartigau E, Pasquier D. Prospective Study of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12123852. [PMID: 33419316 PMCID: PMC7766204 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Revised: 12/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Tomotherapy is a modern intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique, whose aim is to reduce the high doses delivered to organs at risk. Thus, we conducted a prospective study evaluating the early and medium-term toxicities, the patient’s quality of life, and the aesthetic outcomes (evaluated by both physicians and patients) of tomotherapy for breast cancer. We wanted to show that this treatment is very well tolerated, with low-grade acute toxicities, and has only a moderate impact on patients’ quality of life and aesthetic outcome, in order to support its larger use in this very frequent situation. Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the acute and medium-term toxicities, the quality of life, and aesthetic results of patients with breast cancer (BC) treated with tomotherapy. This was a prospective study, including patients with BC treated by tomotherapy. Radiation therapy delivered 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the breast or chest wall and to lymph node areas, with a simultaneous integrated boost at a dose of 60 Gy at the tumor bed in cases of breast conservative surgery. We included 288 patients, 168 and 120 treated with breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy respectively. Two hundred sixty patients (90.3%) received lymph node irradiation. Median follow-up was 25 months (6–48). Acute dermatitis was observed in 278 patients (96.5%), mostly grade 1 (59.7%). The aesthetic aspect of the breast at one year was reported as “good” or “excellent” in 84.6% of patients. The patients’ quality of life improved over time, especially those treated with chemotherapy. The two-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 97.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): 94.1–99.2%), and 93.4% (95% CI: 89.2–96.0%) respectively. Tomotherapy for locally advanced BC has acceptable toxicity, supporting its use in this indication; however, longer follow-up is needed to assess long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoît Bataille
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, 59020 Lille, France; (B.B.); (B.R.); (F.L.T.); (L.B.); (A.E.); (H.L.); (E.L.)
| | - Bennadji Raoudha
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, 59020 Lille, France; (B.B.); (B.R.); (F.L.T.); (L.B.); (A.E.); (H.L.); (E.L.)
| | - Florence Le Tinier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, 59020 Lille, France; (B.B.); (B.R.); (F.L.T.); (L.B.); (A.E.); (H.L.); (E.L.)
| | - Laurent Basson
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, 59020 Lille, France; (B.B.); (B.R.); (F.L.T.); (L.B.); (A.E.); (H.L.); (E.L.)
| | - Alexandre Escande
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, 59020 Lille, France; (B.B.); (B.R.); (F.L.T.); (L.B.); (A.E.); (H.L.); (E.L.)
| | - Hélène Langin
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, 59020 Lille, France; (B.B.); (B.R.); (F.L.T.); (L.B.); (A.E.); (H.L.); (E.L.)
| | - Emmanuelle Tresch
- Methodology and Biostatistics Department, Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, 59020 Lille, France;
| | - Frederik Crop
- Medical Physics Department, Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, 59020 Lille, France;
| | - Franck Darloy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leonard De Vinci center, 59187 Dechy, France; (F.D.); (D.C.)
| | - Damien Carlier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leonard De Vinci center, 59187 Dechy, France; (F.D.); (D.C.)
| | - Eric Lartigau
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, 59020 Lille, France; (B.B.); (B.R.); (F.L.T.); (L.B.); (A.E.); (H.L.); (E.L.)
- CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, 59000 Lille, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, 59020 Lille, France; (B.B.); (B.R.); (F.L.T.); (L.B.); (A.E.); (H.L.); (E.L.)
- CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, 59000 Lille, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-3-20-29-59-11; Fax: +33-3-20-29-59-72
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Krug D, Vonthein R, Schreiber A, Boicev AD, Zimmer J, Laubach R, Weidner N, Dinges S, Hipp M, Schneider R, Weinstrauch E, Martin T, Hörner-Rieber J, Olbrich D, Illen A, Heßler N, König IR, Dellas K, Dunst J. Impact of guideline changes on adoption of hypofractionation and breast cancer patient characteristics in the randomized controlled HYPOSIB trial. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 197:802-811. [PMID: 33320286 PMCID: PMC8397631 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01730-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Hypofractionated radiotherapy is the standard of care for adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy (RT). However, adoption has been slow. The indication for regional nodal irradiation has been expanded to include patients with 0–3 involved lymph nodes. We investigated the impact of the publication of the updated German S3 guidelines in 2017 on adoption of hypofractionation and enrollment of patients with lymph node involvement within a randomized controlled phase III trial. Methods In the experimental arm of the HYPOSIB trial (NCT02474641), hypofractionated RT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) was used. In the standard arm, RT could be given as hypofractionated RT with sequential boost (HFseq), normofractionated RT with sequential boost (NFseq), or normofractionated RT with SIB (NFSIB). The cutoff date for the updated German S3 guidelines was December 17, 2017. Temporal trends were analyzed by generalized linear regression models. Multiple logistic regression models were used to investigate the influence of time (prior to/after guideline) and setting (university hospital/other institutions) on the fractionation patterns. Results Enrollment of patients with involved lymph nodes was low throughout the trial. Adoption of HFseq increased over time and when using the guideline publication date as cutoff. Results of the multiple logistic regressions showed an interaction between time and setting. Furthermore, the use of HFseq was significantly more common in university hospitals. Conclusion The use of HFseq in the standard arm increased over the course of the HYPOSIB trial and after publication of the S3 guideline update. This was primarily driven by patients treated in university hospitals. Enrolment of patients with lymph node involvement was low throughout the trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Reinhard Vonthein
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Andreas Schreiber
- Praxis für Strahlentherapie Dr. med. Andreas Schreiber, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexander D Boicev
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Heinrich-Braun-Klinikum Zwickau, Zwickau, Germany
| | - Jörg Zimmer
- Praxis für Strahlentherapie Dr. med. Andreas Schreiber, Dresden, Germany
| | - Reinhold Laubach
- Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, St. Marien-Krankenhaus Siegen, Siegen, Germany
| | - Nicola Weidner
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stefan Dinges
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie & Radioonkologie, Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Hipp
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Klinikum Amberg, Amberg, Germany
| | - Ralf Schneider
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Helios-Kliniken Schwerin, Schwerin, Germany
| | - Evelyn Weinstrauch
- Praxis für Radioonkologie, Johanniter-Zentren für Medizinische Versorgung Stendal, Stendal, Germany
| | - Thomas Martin
- Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Fachbereich RadioOnkologie, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- RadioOnkologie und Strahlentherapie, UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Denise Olbrich
- ZKS Lübeck (Zentrum für klinische Studien Lübeck), Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Alicia Illen
- ZKS Lübeck (Zentrum für klinische Studien Lübeck), Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Nicole Heßler
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Inke R König
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Kathrin Dellas
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hörner-Rieber J, Forster T, Hommertgen A, Haefner MF, Arians N, König L, Harrabi SB, Schlampp I, Weykamp F, Lischalk JW, Heinrich V, Weidner N, Hüsing J, Sohn C, Heil J, Hof H, Krug D, Debus J. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) With Simultaneously Integrated Boost Shortens Treatment Time and Is Noninferior to Conventional Radiation Therapy Followed by Sequential Boost in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment: Results of a Large Randomized Phase III Trial (IMRT-MC2 Trial). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:1311-1324. [PMID: 33321192 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the modern era, improvements in radiation therapy techniques have paved the way for simultaneous integrated boost irradiation in adjuvant breast radiation therapy after breast conservation surgery. Nevertheless, randomized trials supporting the noninferiority of this treatment to historical standards of care approach are lacking. METHODS A prospective, multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial (NCT01322854) was performed to analyze noninferiority of conventional fractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost (IMRT-SIB) to 3-D conformal radiation therapy with sequential boost (3-D-CRT-seqB) for breast cancer patients. Primary outcomes were local control (LC) rates at 2 and 5 years (noninferiority margin at hazard ratio [HR] of 3.5) as well as cosmetic results 6 weeks and 2 years after radiation therapy (evaluated via photo documentation calculating the relative breast retraction assessment [pBRA] score [noninferiority margin of 1.25]). RESULTS A total of 502 patients were randomly assigned from 2011 to 2015. After a median follow-up of 5.1 years, the 2-year LC for the IMRT-SIB arm was noninferior to the 3-D-CRT-seqB arm (99.6% vs 99.6%, respectively; HR, 0.602; 95% CI, 0.123-2.452; P = .487). In addition, noninferiority was also shown for cosmesis after IMRT-SIB and 3-D-CRT-seqB at both 6 weeks (median pBRA, 9.1% vs 9.1%) and 2 years (median pBRA, 10.4% vs 9.8%) after radiation therapy (95% CI, -0.317 to 0.107 %; P = .332). Cosmetic assessment according to the Harvard scale by both the patient and the treating physician as well as late-toxicity evaluation with the late effects normal tissues- subjective, objective, management, analytic criteria, a score for the evaluation of long-term adverse effects in normal tissue, revealed no significant differences between treatment arms. In addition, there was no difference in overall survival rates (99.6% vs 99.6%; HR, 3.281; 95% CI: -0.748 to 22.585; P = .148) for IMRT-SIB and 3-D-CRT-seqB, respectively. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first prospective trial reporting the noninferiority of IMRT-SIB versus 3-D-CRT-seqB with respect to cosmesis and LC at 2 years of follow-up. This treatment regimen considerably shortens adjuvant radiation therapy times without compromising clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Adriane Hommertgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias F Haefner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nathalie Arians
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi B Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ingmar Schlampp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonathan W Lischalk
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, Lagone Medical Center, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Vanessa Heinrich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Nicola Weidner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Johannes Hüsing
- Division of Biostatistics, Coordination Centre for Clinical Trials, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof Sohn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörrg Heil
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Holger Hof
- Strahlentherapie Rhein-Pfalz, Neustadt, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, partner site Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Acute toxicity of normofractionated intensity modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with sequential boost in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:235. [PMID: 33050920 PMCID: PMC7557053 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01652-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) improves dose homogeneity and late toxicity compared to simple tangential techniques in adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy for patients with breast cancer. Simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) radiotherapy shortens the overall treatment time and improves dose homogeneity. However, prospective randomized trials regarding IMRT with SIB for adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer are lacking. METHODS The IMRT-MC2 (MINT) trial is a phase III prospective randomized controlled trial comparing IMRT with SIB (Arm A: whole breast 28 × 1.8 Gy, Boost 28 × 2.3 Gy) to 3D-conformal radiotherapy with a sequential boost (Arm B: whole breast 28 × 1.8 Gy, boost 8 × 2 Gy) in patients with breast cancer after BCS. Indication for boost radiotherapy was defined as age < 70 years or age > 70 years with presence of additional risk factors. This is a retrospective analysis of acute toxicity at one of two trial sites. RESULTS Five hundred two patients were randomized, of which 446 patients were eligible for this analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of any grade radiation dermatitis between the two treatment arms at the end of treatment (p = 0.26). However, radiation dermatitis grade 2/3 (29.1% vs. 20.1 and 3.5% vs. 2.3%) occurred significantly more often in Arm A (p = 0.02). Breast/chest wall pain at the first follow-up visit was significantly more common in patients treated on Arm B (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Treatment on both arms was well tolerated, however there were some differences regarding radiodermatitis and breast pain. Further analyses are ongoing. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov , NCT01322854 , registered 24th March 2011.
Collapse
|
14
|
Wang X, Ge X, Wang X, Zhang W, Zhou H, Lin Y, Qie S, Hu M, Wang W, Liu K, Pang Q, Li M, Chen J, Liu M, Zhang K, Li L, Shi Y, Deng W, Li C, Ni W, Chang X, Han W, Deng L, Wang W, Liang J, Bi N, Zhang T, Liu W, Wang J, Zhai Y, Feng Q, Chen D, Zhou Z, Zhao Y, Sun X, Xiao Z. S-1-Based Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy With S-1 in Elderly Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Phase II Trial. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1499. [PMID: 32983991 PMCID: PMC7484368 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Intensive treatments can often not be administered to elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), leading to a poorer prognosis. This multi-center phase II trial aimed to determine the toxicity profile and efficiency of S-1–based simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy (SIB-RT) followed by consolidation chemotherapy with S-1 in elderly ESCC patients and to evaluate the usefulness of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Patients and Methods: We prospectively enrolled 46 elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) with histopathologically proven ESCC. The patients underwent pretreatment CGA followed by SIB-RT (dose, 59.92 Gy/50.4 Gy) in 28 daily fractions administered using intensity-modulated radiotherapy or volumetric-modulated arc therapy. S-1 was orally administered (40–60 mg/m2) concurrently with radiotherapy and 4–8 weeks later, for up to four 3-week cycles at the same dose. Results: The median survival time was 22.6 months. The 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 80.4 and 47.8%, respectively. The overall response rate was 78.3% (36/46). The incidence of grade 3–4 toxicities was 28% (13/46). The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were radiation esophagitis (5/46, 10.9%), nausea (4/46, 8.7%), anorexia (3/46, 6.5%), and radiation pneumonitis (3/46, 6.5%). There were no grade 5 toxicities. CGA identified that 48.8% of patients were at risk for depression and 65.5% had malnutrition. Conclusion: Concurrent S-1 treatment with SIB-RT followed by 4 cycles of S-1 monotherapy yielded satisfactory tumor response rates and manageable toxicities in selected elderly patients with ESCC. Pretreatment CGA uncovered numerous health problems and allowed the provision of appropriate supportive care. Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02979691.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaolin Ge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaomin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Wencheng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Haiwen Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Yu Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shuai Qie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China
| | - Miaomiao Hu
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Ke Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Qingsong Pang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Minghe Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Junqiang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Miaoling Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China
| | - Kaixian Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Yonggang Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Wei Deng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjie Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weiming Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenqing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Nan Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenyang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianyang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yirui Zhai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qinfu Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Dongfu Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zongmei Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yidian Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Xinchen Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China
| | - Zefen Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Saldi S, Perrucci E, Fulcheri CPL, Mariucci C, Chierchini S, Ingrosso G, Falcinelli L, Podlesko AM, Merluzzi M, Bini V, Aristei C. Zinc-L-carnosine prevented dysphagia in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy: Results of a phase III randomized trial. Breast J 2020; 26:1882-1884. [PMID: 32383225 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2020] [Revised: 04/05/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Simonetta Saldi
- Radiation Oncology Section, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | | | | | - Cristina Mariucci
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Sara Chierchini
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Anna Maria Podlesko
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Mara Merluzzi
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Vittorio Bini
- Internal Medicine, Endocrinology & Metabolism, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|