Deep Learning for the Radiographic Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss

Applications of artificial intelligence in dentomaxillofacial imaging: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been increasingly developed in oral and maxillofacial imaging. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the applications and performance of the developed algorithms in different dentomaxillofacial imaging modalities.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus databases was performed. The search strategy was set as a combination of the following keywords: "Artificial Intelligence," "Machine Learning," "Deep Learning," "Neural Networks," "Head and Neck Imaging," and "Maxillofacial Imaging." Full-text screening and data extraction were independently conducted by two independent reviewers; any mismatch was resolved by discussion. The risk of bias was assessed by one reviewer and validated by another.

RESULTS

The search returned a total of 3,392 articles. After careful evaluation of the titles, abstracts, and full texts, a total number of 194 articles were included. Most studies focused on AI applications for tooth and implant classification and identification, 3-dimensional cephalometric landmark detection, lesion detection (periapical, jaws, and bone), and osteoporosis detection.

CONCLUSION

Despite the AI models' limitations, they showed promising results. Further studies are needed to explore specific applications and real-world scenarios before confidently integrating these models into dental practice.

Radiographical diagnostic competences of dental students using various feedback methods and integrating an artificial intelligence application-A randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Radiographic diagnostic competences are a primary focus of dental education. This study assessed two feedback methods to enhance learning outcomes and explored the feasibility of artificial intelligence (AI) to support education.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourth-year dental students had access to 16 virtual radiological example cases for 8 weeks. They were randomly assigned to either elaborated feedback (eF) or knowledge of results feedback (KOR) based on expert consensus. Students´ diagnostic competences were tested on bitewing/periapical radiographs for detection of caries, apical periodontitis, accuracy for all radiological findings and image quality. We additionally assessed the accuracy of an AI system (dentalXrai Pro 3.0), where applicable. Data were analysed descriptively and using ROC analysis (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUC). Groups were compared with Welch's t-test.

RESULTS

Among 55 students, the eF group by large performed significantly better than the KOR group in detecting enamel caries (accuracy 0.840 ± 0.041, p = .196; sensitivity 0.638 ± 0.204, p = .037; specificity 0.859 ± 0.050, p = .410; ROC AUC 0.748 ± 0.094, p = .020), apical periodontitis (accuracy 0.813 ± 0.095, p = .011; sensitivity 0.476 ± 0.230, p = .003; specificity 0.914 ± 0.108, p = .292; ROC AUC 0.695 ± 0.123, p = .001) and in assessing the image quality of periapical images (p = .031). No significant differences were observed for the other outcomes. The AI showed almost perfect diagnostic performance (enamel caries: accuracy 0.964, sensitivity 0.857, specificity 0.074; dentin caries: accuracy 0.988, sensitivity 0.941, specificity 1.0; overall: accuracy 0.976, sensitivity 0.958, specificity 0.983).

CONCLUSION

Elaborated feedback can improve student's radiographic diagnostic competences, particularly in detecting enamel caries and apical periodontitis. Using an AI may constitute an alternative to expert labelling of radiographs.

Tooth numbering with polygonal segmentation on periapical radiographs: an artificial intelligence study

OBJECTIVES

Accurately identification and tooth numbering on radiographs is essential for any clinicians. The aim of the present study was to validate the hypothesis that Yolov5, a type of artificial intelligence model, can be trained to detect and number teeth in periapical radiographs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six thousand four hundred forty six anonymized periapical radiographs without motion-related artifacts were randomly selected from the database. All periapical radiographs in which all boundaries of any tooth could be distinguished were included in the study. The radiographic images used were randomly divided into three groups: 80% training, 10% validation, and 10% testing. The confusion matrix was used to examine model success.

RESULTS

During the test phase, 2578 labelings were performed on 644 periapical radiographs. The number of true positive was 2434 (94.4%), false positive was 115 (4.4%), and false negative was 29 (1.2%). The recall, precision, and F1 scores were 0.9882, 0.9548, and 0.9712, respectively. Moreover, the model yielded an area under curve (AUC) of 0.603 on the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed us that YOLOv5 is nearly perfect for numbering teeth on periapical radiography. Although high success rates were achieved as a result of the study, it should not be forgotten that artificial intelligence currently only can be guides dentists for accurate and rapid diagnosis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

It is thought that dentists can accelerate the radiographic examination time and inexperienced dentists can reduce the error rate by using YOLOv5. Additionally, YOLOv5 can also be used in the education of dentistry students.

Automating Dental Condition Detection on Panoramic Radiographs: Challenges, Pitfalls, and Opportunities

Background/Objectives: The integration of AI into dentistry holds promise for improving diagnostic workflows, particularly in the detection of dental pathologies and pre-radiotherapy screening for head and neck cancer patients. This study aimed to develop and validate an AI model for detecting various dental conditions, with a focus on identifying teeth at risk prior to radiotherapy. Methods: A YOLOv8 model was trained on a dataset of 1628 annotated panoramic radiographs and externally validated on 180 radiographs from multiple centers. The model was designed to detect a variety of dental conditions, including periapical lesions, impacted teeth, root fragments, prosthetic restorations, and orthodontic devices. Results: The model showed strong performance in detecting implants, endodontic treatments, and surgical devices, with precision and recall values exceeding 0.8 for several conditions. However, performance declined during external validation, highlighting the need for improvements in generalizability. Conclusions: YOLOv8 demonstrated robust detection capabilities for several dental conditions, especially in training data. However, further refinement is needed to enhance generalizability in external datasets and improve performance for conditions like periapical lesions and bone loss.

Comparing the accuracy of two machine learning models in detection and classification of periapical lesions using periapical radiographs

BACKGROUND

Previous deep learning-based studies were mainly conducted on detecting periapical lesions; limited information in classification, such as the periapical index (PAI) scoring system, is available. The study aimed to apply two deep learning models, Faster R-CNN and YOLOv4, in detecting and classifying periapical lesions using the PAI score from periapical radiographs (PR) in three different regions of the dental arch: anterior teeth, premolars, and molars.

METHODS

Out of 2658 PR selected for the study, 2122 PR were used for training, 268 PR were used for validation and 268 PR were used for testing. The diagnosis made by experienced dentists was used as the reference diagnosis.

RESULTS

The Faster R-CNN and YOLOv4 models obtained great sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and precision for detecting periapical lesions. No clear difference in the performance of both models among these three regions was found. The true prediction of Faster R-CNN was 89%, 83.01% and 91.84% for PAI 3, PAI 4 and PAI 5 lesions, respectively. The corresponding values of YOLOv4 were 68.06%, 50.94%, and 65.31%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated the potential of YOLOv4 and Faster R-CNN models for detecting and classifying periapical lesions based on the PAI scoring system using periapical radiographs.

Toward Digital Periodontal Health: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives

Periodontal diseases, ranging from gingivitis to periodontitis, are prevalent oral diseases affecting over 50% of the global population. These diseases arise from infections and inflammation of the gums and supporting bones, significantly impacting oral health. The established link between periodontal diseases and systemic diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, underscores their importance as a public health concern. Consequently, the early detection and prevention of periodontal diseases have become critical objectives in healthcare, particularly through the integration of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. This paper aims to bridge the gap between clinical practices and cutting-edge technologies by providing a comprehensive review of current research. We examine the identification of causative factors, disease progression, and the role of AI in enhancing early detection and treatment. Our goal is to underscore the importance of early intervention in improving patient outcomes and to stimulate further interest among researchers, bioengineers, and AI specialists in the ongoing exploration of AI applications in periodontal disease diagnosis.

Artificial Intelligence-Related Dental Research: Bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent years have witnessed an explosive surge in dental research related to artificial intelligence (AI). These applications have optimised dental workflows, demonstrating significant clinical importance. Understanding the current landscape and trends of this topic is crucial for both clinicians and researchers to utilise and advance this technology. However, a comprehensive scientometric study regarding this field had yet to be performed.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection database to identify eligible "research articles" and "reviews." Literature screening and exclusion were performed by 2 investigators. Thereafter, VOSviewer was utilised in co-occurrence analysis and CiteSpace in co-citation analysis. R package Bibliometrix was employed to automatically calculate scientific impacts, determining the core authors and journals. Altmetric data were described narratively and supplemented with Spearman correlation analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1558 research publications were included. During the past 5 years, AI-related dental publications drastically increased in number, from 36 to 581. Diagnostics and Scientific Reports published the most articles, whereas Journal of Dental Research received the highest number of citations per article. China, the US, and South Korea emerged as the most prolific countries, whilst Germany received the highest number of citations per article (23.29). Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin was the institution with the highest number of publications and citations per article (29.16). Altmetric Attention Score was correlated with News Mentions (P < .001), and significant associations were observed amongst Dimension Citations, Mendeley Readers, and Web of Science Citations (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The publication numbers regarding AI-related dental research have been rising rapidly and may continue their upwards trend. China, the US, South Korea, and Germany had promoted the progress of AI-related dental research. Disease diagnosis, orthodontic applications, and morphology segmentation were current hotspots. Attention mechanism, explainable AI, multimodal data fusion, and AI-generated text assistants necessitate future research and exploration.

Periodontitis diagnosis: A review of current and future trends in artificial intelligence

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) acts as the state-of-the-art in periodontitis diagnosis in dentistry. Current diagnostic challenges include errors due to a lack of experienced dentists, limited time for radiograph analysis, and mandatory reporting, impacting care quality, cost, and efficiency.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to evaluate the current and future trends in AI for diagnosing periodontitis.

METHODS

A thorough literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. We searched databases including PubMed, Scopus, Wiley Online Library, and ScienceDirect for studies published between January 2018 and December 2023. Keywords used in the search included "artificial intelligence," "panoramic radiograph," "periodontitis," "periodontal disease," and "diagnosis."

RESULTS

The review included 12 studies from an initial 211 records. These studies used advanced models, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), demonstrating accuracy rates for periodontal bone loss detection ranging from 0.76 to 0.98. Methodologies included deep learning hybrid methods, automated identification systems, and machine learning classifiers, enhancing diagnostic precision and efficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating AI innovations in periodontitis diagnosis enhances diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, providing a robust alternative to conventional methods. These technologies offer quicker, less labor-intensive, and more precise alternatives to classical approaches. Future research should focus on improving AI model reliability and generalizability to ensure widespread clinical adoption.

Evaluation of tooth development stages with deep learning-based artificial intelligence algorithm

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the performance of a deep learning system for the evaluation of tooth development stages on images obtained from panoramic radiographs from child patients.

METHODS

The study collected a total of 1500 images obtained from panoramic radiographs from child patients between the ages of 5 and 14 years. YOLOv5, a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based object detection model, was used to automatically detect the calcification states of teeth. Images obtained from panoramic radiographs from child patients were trained and tested in the YOLOv5 algorithm. True-positive (TP), false-positive (FP), and false-negative (FN) ratios were calculated. A confusion matrix was used to evaluate the performance of the model.

RESULTS

Among the 146 test group images with 1022 labels, there were 828 TPs, 308 FPs, and 1 FN. The sensitivity, precision, and F1-score values of the detection model of the tooth stage development model were 0.99, 0.72, and 0.84, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, utilizing a deep learning-based approach for the detection of dental development on pediatric panoramic radiographs may facilitate a precise evaluation of the chronological correlation between tooth development stages and age. This can help clinicians make treatment decisions and aid dentists in finding more accurate treatment options.

Conquering class imbalances in deep learning-based segmentation of dental radiographs with different loss functions

OBJECTIVE

The imbalanced nature of real-world datasets is an ongoing challenge in the field of machine and deep learning. In medicine and in dentistry, most data samples represent patients not affected by pathologies, and on imagery, pathologic image areas are often smaller than healthy ones. Selecting suitable loss functions during deep learning is essential and may help to overcome the resulting imbalance. We assessed six different loss functions for one exemplary task, tooth structure segmentation on bitewing radiographs, for their performance.

METHODS

Six different loss functions (Focal Loss, Dice Loss, Tversky Loss and hybrid losses of Cross-Entropy and Dice Loss, Focal and Dice Loss, Focal and Generalized Dice Loss) were compared on a tooth structure segmentation task of 1,625 bitewing radiographs. Training was performed using three different model architectures (U-Net, Linknet, DeepLavbV3+) over a 5-fold cross-validation. Tooth structures consisted of the classes (occurrence in% of samples/captures areas measured on pixel level) enamel (100 %/25 %), dentin (100 %/50 %), root canal (100 %/10 %), filling (81 %/8 %) and crown (28 %/5 %).

RESULTS

Hybrid loss functions significantly outperformed standalone ones and provided robust results over the different architectures for the classes enamel, dentin, root canal and filling. Specifically, the Dice Focal loss reached high performance to conquer both image level and pixel level class imbalance, respectively.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

In dental use cases it is often important to predict minority classes such as pathologies accurately. Using specific loss function may be an effective strategy to overcome data imbalance when training deep learning models.

Applications of Machine Learning in Periodontology and Implantology: A Comprehensive Review

Machine learning (ML) has led to significant advances in dentistry, easing the workload of professionals and improving the performance of various medical processes. The fields of periodontology and implantology can profit from these advances for tasks such as determining periodontally compromised teeth, assisting doctors in the implant planning process, determining types of implants, or predicting the occurrence of peri-implantitis. The current paper provides an overview of recent ML techniques applied in periodontology and implantology, aiming to identify popular models for different medical tasks, to assess the impact of the training data on the success of the automatic algorithms and to highlight advantages and disadvantages of various approaches. 48 original research papers, published between 2016 and 2023, were selected and divided into four classes: periodontology, implant planning, implant brands and types, and success of dental implants. These papers were analyzed in terms of aim, technical details, characteristics of training and testing data, results, and medical observations. The purpose of this paper is not to provide an exhaustive survey, but to show representative methods from recent literature that highlight the advantages and disadvantages of various approaches, as well as the potential of applying machine learning in dentistry.

Deep learning based approach: automated gingival inflammation grading model using gingival removal strategy

Gingival inflammation grade serves as a well-established index in periodontitis. The aim of this study was to develop a deep learning network utilizing a novel feature extraction method for the automatic assessment of gingival inflammation. T-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) was utilized for dimensionality reduction. A convolutional neural network (CNN) model based on DenseNet was developed for the identification and evaluation of gingival inflammation. To enhance the performance of the deep learning (DL) model, a novel teeth removal algorithm was implemented. Additionally, a Grad-CAM +  + encoder was applied to generate heatmaps for computer visual attention analysis. The mean Intersection over Union (MIoU) for the identification of gingivitis was 0.727 ± 0.117. The accuracy rates for the five inflammatory degrees were 77.09%, 77.25%, 74.38%, 73.68% and 79.22%. The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) values were 0.83, 0.80, 0.81, 0.81 and 0.84, respectively. The attention ratio towards gingival tissue increased from 37.73% to 62.20%, and within 8 mm of the gingival margin, it rose from 21.11% to 38.23%. On the gingiva, the overall attention ratio increased from 51.82% to 78.21%. The proposed DL model with novel feature extraction method provides high accuracy and sensitivity for identifying and grading gingival inflammation.

Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Automated Staging of Periodontal Bone Loss Severity on Bite-wing Radiographs: An Eigen-CAM Explainability Mapping Approach

Periodontal disease is a significant global oral health problem. Radiographic staging is critical in determining periodontitis severity and treatment requirements. This study aims to automatically stage periodontal bone loss using a deep learning approach using bite-wing images. A total of 1752 bite-wing images were used for the study. Radiological examinations were classified into 4 groups. Healthy (normal), no bone loss; stage I (mild destruction), bone loss in the coronal third (< 15%); stage II (moderate destruction), bone loss is in the coronal third and from 15 to 33% (15-33%); stage III-IV (severe destruction), bone loss extending from the middle third to the apical third with furcation destruction (> 33%). All images were converted to 512 × 400 dimensions using bilinear interpolation. The data was divided into 80% training validation and 20% testing. The classification module of the YOLOv8 deep learning model was used for the artificial intelligence-based classification of the images. Based on four class results, it was trained using fivefold cross-validation after transfer learning and fine tuning. After the training, 20% of test data, which the system had never seen, were analyzed using the artificial intelligence weights obtained in each cross-validation. Training and test results were calculated with average accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score performance metrics. Test images were analyzed with Eigen-CAM explainability heat maps. In the classification of bite-wing images as healthy, mild destruction, moderate destruction, and severe destruction, training performance results were 86.100% accuracy, 84.790% precision, 82.350% recall, and 84.411% F1-score, and test performance results were 83.446% accuracy, 81.742% precision, 80.883% recall, and 81.090% F1-score. The deep learning model gave successful results in staging periodontal bone loss in bite-wing images. Classification scores were relatively high for normal (no bone loss) and severe bone loss in bite-wing images, as they are more clearly visible than mild and moderate damage.

AI-Driven localization of all impacted teeth and prediction of winter angulation for third molars on panoramic radiographs: Clinical user interface design

PURPOSE

Impacted teeth are abnormal tooth disorders under the gums or jawbone that cannot take their normal position even though it is time to erupt. This study aims to detect all impacted teeth and to classify impacted third molars according to the Winter method with an artificial intelligence model on panoramic radiographs.

METHODS

In this study, 1197 panoramic radiographs from the dentistry faculty database were collected for all impacted teeth, and 1000 panoramic radiographs were collected for Winter classification. Some pre-processing methods were performed and the images were doubled with data augmentation. Both datasets were randomly divided into 80% training, 10% validation, and 10% testing. After transfer learning and fine-tuning processes, the two datasets were trained with the YOLOv8 deep learning algorithm, a high-performance artificial intelligence model, and the detection of impacted teeth was carried out. The results were evaluated with precision, recall, mAP, and F1-score performance metrics. A graphical user interface was designed for clinical use with the artificial intelligence weights obtained as a result of the training.

RESULTS

For the detection of impacted third molar teeth according to Winter classification, the average precision, average recall, and average F1 score were obtained to be 0.972, 0.967, and 0.969, respectively. For the detection of all impacted teeth, the average precision, average recall, and average F1 score were obtained as 0.991, 0.995, and 0.993, respectively.

CONCLUSION

According to the results, the artificial intelligence-based YOLOv8 deep learning model successfully detected all impacted teeth and the impacted third molar teeth according to the Winter classification system.

Artificial intelligence in dentistry: A bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2023

Background/purpose

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping clinical practice in dentistry. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of global trends and research hotspots on the application of AI to dentistry.

Materials and methods

Studies on AI in dentistry published between 2000 and 2023 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. Bibliometric parameters were extracted and bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer, Pajek, and CiteSpace software.

Results

A total of 651 publications were identified, 88.7 % of which were published after 2019. Publications originating from the United States and China accounted for 34.5 % of the total. The Charité Medical University of Berlin was the institution with the highest number of publications, and Schwendicke and Krois were the most active authors in the field. The Journal of Dentistry had the highest citation count. The focus of AI in dentistry primarily centered on the analysis of imaging data and the dental diseases most frequently associated with AI were periodontitis, bone fractures, and dental caries. The dental AI applications most frequently discussed since 2019 included neural networks, medical devices, clinical decision support systems, head and neck cancer, support vector machine, geometric deep learning, and precision medicine.

Conclusion

Research on AI in dentistry is experiencing explosive growth. The prevailing research emphasis and anticipated future development involve the establishment of medical devices and clinical decision support systems based on innovative AI algorithms to advance precision dentistry. This study provides dentists with valuable insights into this field.

Accuracy of machine learning in the diagnosis of odontogenic cysts and tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The recent impact of artificial intelligence in diagnostic services has been enormous. Machine learning tools offer an innovative alternative to diagnose cysts and tumors radiographically that pose certain challenges due to the near similar presentation, anatomical variations, and superimposition. It is crucial that the performance of these models is evaluated for their clinical applicability in diagnosing cysts and tumors.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was carried out on eminent databases for published studies between January 2015 and December 2022. Studies utilizing machine learning models in the diagnosis of odontogenic cysts or tumors using Orthopantomograms (OPG) or Cone Beam Computed Tomographic images (CBCT) were included. QUADAS-2 tool was used for the assessment of the risk of bias and applicability concerns. Meta-analysis was performed for studies reporting sufficient performance metrics, separately for OPG and CBCT.

RESULTS

16 studies were included for qualitative synthesis including a total of 10,872 odontogenic cysts and tumors. The sensitivity and specificity of machine learning in diagnosing cysts and tumors through OPG were 0.83 (95% CI 0.81-0.85) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.81-0.83) respectively. Studies utilizing CBCT noted a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.87-0.88) and specificity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.87-0.89). Highest classification accuracy was 100%, noted for Support Vector Machine classifier.

CONCLUSION

The results from the present review favoured machine learning models to be used as a clinical adjunct in the radiographic diagnosis of odontogenic cysts and tumors, provided they undergo robust training with a huge dataset. However, the arduous process, investment, and certain ethical concerns associated with the total dependence on technology must be taken into account. Standardized reporting of outcomes for diagnostic studies utilizing machine learning methods is recommended to ensure homogeneity in assessment criteria, facilitate comparison between different studies, and promote transparency in research findings.

Artificial Intelligence in Periodontics: A Comprehensive Review

Periodontal diseases are prevalent worldwide and pose a significant public health burden. With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI), there has been growing interest in leveraging AI technologies to improve diagnosis, treatment planning, and management of periodontal conditions. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the applications of AI in periodontics, including its potential benefits, challenges, and future directions. Fifteen relevant studies were analyzed to explore the role of AI in periodontal disease detection, risk assessment, treatment planning, and patient management. The findings highlight the promising role of AI in enhancing the accuracy, efficiency, and personalized care delivery in periodontics.

Evaluation of deep learning for detecting intraosseous jaw lesions in cone beam computed tomography volumes

OBJECTIVE

The study aim was to develop and assess the performance of a deep learning (DL) algorithm in the detection of radiolucent intraosseous jaw lesions in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) volumes.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 290 CBCT volumes from more than 12 different scanners were acquired. Fields of view ranged from 6 × 6 × 6 cm to 18 × 18 × 16 cm. CBCT volumes contained either zero or at least one biopsy-confirmed intraosseous lesion. 80 volumes with no intraosseous lesions were included as controls and were not annotated. 210 volumes with intraosseous lesions were manually annotated using ITK-Snap 3.8.0. 150 volumes (10 control, 140 positive) were presented to the DL software for training. Validation was performed using 60 volumes (30 control, 30 positive). Testing was performed using the remaining 80 volumes (40 control, 40 positive).

RESULTS

The DL algorithm obtained an adjusted sensitivity by case, specificity by case, positive predictive value by case, and negative predictive value by case of 0.975, 0.825, 0.848, and 0.971, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A DL algorithm showed moderate success at lesion detection in their correct locations, as well as recognition of lesion shape and extent. This study demonstrated the potential of DL methods for intraosseous lesion detection in CBCT volumes.

Automatic detection and classification of nasopalatine duct cyst and periapical cyst on panoramic radiographs using deep convolutional neural networks

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) method for the detection and classification of nasopalatine duct cysts (NPDC) and periapical cysts (PAC) on panoramic radiographs.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 1,209 panoramic radiographs with 606 NPDC and 603 PAC were labeled with a bounding box and divided into training, validation, and test sets with an 8:1:1 ratio. The networks used were EfficientDet-D3, Faster R-CNN, YOLO v5, RetinaNet, and SSD. Mean average precision (mAP) was used to assess performance. Sixty images with no lesion in the anterior maxilla were added to the previous test set and were tested on 2 dentists with no training in radiology (GP) and on EfficientDet-D3. The performances were comparatively examined.

RESULTS

The mAP for each DCNN was EfficientDet-D3 93.8%, Faster R-CNN 90.8%, YOLO v5 89.5%, RetinaNet 79.4%, and SSD 60.9%. The classification performance of EfficientDet-D3 was higher than that of the GPs' with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 94.4%, 94.4%, 97.2%, 94.6%, and 97.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method achieved high performance for the detection and classification of NPDC and PAC compared with the GPs and presented promising prospects for clinical application.

Oral Health Status and Treatment Needs Based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Dental Panoramic Radiograph (DPR) Analysis: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: The application of artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining popularity in modern dentistry. AI has been successfully used to interpret dental panoramic radiographs (DPRs) and quickly screen large groups of patients. This cross-sectional study aimed to perform a population-based assessment of the oral health status and treatment needs of the residents of Kielce, Poland, and the surrounding area based on DPR analysis performed by a high-accuracy AI algorithm trained with over 250,000 radiographs. Methods: This study included adults who had a panoramic radiograph performed, regardless of indications. The following diagnoses were used for analysis: (1) dental caries, (2) missing tooth, (3) dental filling, (4) root canal filling, (5) endodontic lesion, (6) implant, (7) implant abutment crown, (8) pontic crown, (9) dental abutment crown, and (10) sound tooth. The study sample included 980 subjects. Results: The patients had an average of 15 sound teeth, with the domination of the lower dental arch over the upper one. The most commonly identified pathology was dental caries, which affected 99% of participants. A total of 67% of patients underwent root canal treatment. Every fifth endodontically treated tooth presented a periapical lesion. Of study group members, 82% lost at least one tooth. Pontics were identified more often (9%) than implants (2%) in replacing missing teeth. Conclusions: DPR assessment by AI has proven to be an efficient method for population analysis. Despite recent improvements in the oral health status of Polish residents, its level is still unsatisfactory and suggests the need to improve oral health. However, due to some limitations of this study, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Radiographic diagnosis of periodontal diseases - Current evidence versus innovations

Accurate diagnosis of periodontal and peri-implant diseases relies significantly on radiographic examination, especially for assessing alveolar bone levels, bone defect morphology, and bone quality. This narrative review aimed to comprehensively outline the current state-of-the-art in radiographic diagnosis of alveolar bone diseases, covering both two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) modalities. Additionally, this review explores recent technological advances in periodontal imaging diagnosis, focusing on their potential integration into clinical practice. Clinical probing and intraoral radiography, while crucial, encounter limitations in effectively assessing complex periodontal bone defects. Recognizing these challenges, 3D imaging modalities, such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), have been explored for a more comprehensive understanding of periodontal structures. The significance of the radiographic assessment approach is evidenced by its ability to offer an objective and standardized means of evaluating hard tissues, reducing variability associated with manual clinical measurements and contributing to a more precise diagnosis of periodontal health. However, clinicians should be aware of challenges related to CBCT imaging assessment, including beam-hardening artifacts generated by the high-density materials present in the field of view, which might affect image quality. Integration of digital technologies, such as artificial intelligence-based tools in intraoral radiography software, the enhances the diagnostic process. The overarching recommendation is a judicious combination of CBCT and digital intraoral radiography for enhanced periodontal bone assessment. Therefore, it is crucial for clinicians to weigh the benefits against the risks associated with higher radiation exposure on a case-by-case basis, prioritizing patient safety and treatment outcomes.

Artificial intelligence and personalized diagnostics in periodontology: A narrative review

Periodontal diseases pose a significant global health burden, requiring early detection and personalized treatment approaches. Traditional diagnostic approaches in periodontology often rely on a "one size fits all" approach, which may overlook the unique variations in disease progression and response to treatment among individuals. This narrative review explores the role of artificial intelligence (AI) and personalized diagnostics in periodontology, emphasizing the potential for tailored diagnostic strategies to enhance precision medicine in periodontal care. The review begins by elucidating the limitations of conventional diagnostic techniques. Subsequently, it delves into the application of AI models in analyzing diverse data sets, such as clinical records, imaging, and molecular information, and its role in periodontal training. Furthermore, the review also discusses the role of research community and policymakers in integrating personalized diagnostics in periodontal care. Challenges and ethical considerations associated with adopting AI-based personalized diagnostic tools are also explored, emphasizing the need for transparent algorithms, data safety and privacy, ongoing multidisciplinary collaboration, and patient involvement. In conclusion, this narrative review underscores the transformative potential of AI in advancing periodontal diagnostics toward a personalized paradigm, and their integration into clinical practice holds the promise of ushering in a new era of precision medicine for periodontal care.

AI model to detect contact relationship between maxillary sinus and posterior teeth

Objectives

To establish a novel deep learning networks (MSF-MPTnet) based on panoramic radiographs (PRs) for automatic assessment of relationship between maxillary sinus floor (MSF) and maxillary posterior teeth (MPT), and to compare accuracy of MSF-MPTnet, dentists and radiologists identifying contact relationship.

Study design

A total of 1035 PRs and 1035 Cone-beam computed tomographys （CBCT）images were collected from January 2018 to April 2022. The relationships were classified into class I and II by CBCT. Class I represents non-contact group, and class II represents contact group. 350 PRs were randomly selected as test dataset and accuracy of MSF-MPTnet, dentists, and radiologists was compared.

Results

The intraclass correlation coefficient of dentists was 0.460-0.690 and it was 0.453-0.664 for radiologists. Sensitivity and accuracy of MSF-MPTnet were 0.682-0.852and 0.890-0.951, indicating that the output performance of MSF-MPTnet was reliable. Accuracy of maxillary premolars and molars were 79.7%-90.3 %, 76.2%-89.2 % and 72.9%-88.3 % in MSF-MPTnet model, dentists and radiologists. Accuracy of class I relationship in the MSF-MPTnet model (67.7%-94.6 %) was higher than that of dentists (56.5%-84.6 %) in maxillary first premolars and right second premolar, and accuracy of class I relationship in the MSF-MPTnet model is also higher than radiologists (40.0%-78.1 %) in all teeth positions (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

MSF-MPTnet model could increase detecting accuracy of the relationship between MSF and MPT, minimize pseudo contact relationship and reduce frequency of CBCT use.

AI-Assisted Detection of Interproximal, Occlusal, and Secondary Caries on Bite-Wing Radiographs: A Single-Shot Deep Learning Approach

Tooth decay is a common oral disease worldwide, but errors in diagnosis can often be made in dental clinics, which can lead to a delay in treatment. This study aims to use artificial intelligence (AI) for the automated detection and localization of secondary, occlusal, and interproximal (D1, D2, D3) caries types on bite-wing radiographs. The eight hundred and sixty bite-wing radiographs were collected from the School of Dentistry database. Pre-processing and data augmentation operations were performed. Interproximal (D1, D2, D3), secondary, and occlusal caries on bite-wing radiographs were annotated by two oral radiologists. The data were split into 80% for training, 10% for validation, and 10% for testing. The AI-based training process was conducted using the YOLOv8 algorithm. A clinical decision support system interface was designed using the Python PyQT5 library, allowing for the use of dental caries detection without the need for complex programming procedures. In the test images, the average precision, average sensitivity, and average F1 score values for secondary, occlusal, and interproximal caries were obtained as 0.977, 0.932, and 0.954, respectively. The AI-based dental caries detection system yielded highly successful results in the test, receiving full approval from dentists for clinical use. YOLOv8 has the potential to increase sensitivity and reliability while reducing the burden on dentists and can prevent diagnostic errors in dental clinics.

Periodontal grading-estimation of responsiveness to therapy and progression of disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the capability of periodontal grading to estimate the progression of periodontal disease and the responsiveness to therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-four patients who underwent non-surgical therapy (NST) were included. Direct and indirect evidence of progression were determined according to the current classification. Responsiveness to therapy was examined using mean pocket probing depths reduction (PPDRed), reduction of bleeding on probing (BOPRed), and the rate of pocket closure (%PC) after six months.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis revealed no agreement between direct and indirect evidence in grading periodontitis (κ = 0.070). The actual rate of progression as determined by longitudinal data was underestimated in 13% (n = 11), overestimated in 51% (n = 43) and correctly estimated in 30% (n = 36) by indirect evidence. No significant differences in responsiveness to therapy were observed in patients graded according to direct evidence. Using indirect evidence, patients assigned grade C showed more PPDRed but less BOPRed and lower %PC compared to grade B.

CONCLUSION

The present data indicate that indirect evidence may lead to inaccuracies compared to direct evidence regarding the estimation of periodontal progression. However, indirect evidence seems to be more suitable in the estimation of responsiveness to therapy than direct evidence, helping to identify cases that are more likely to require additional therapies such as re-instrumentation or periodontal surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Regarding the estimation of disease progression and responsiveness to periodontal therapy, accuracy and reliability of both direct and indirect evidence are limited when grading periodontitis.

Classification of Periapical and Bitewing Radiographs as Periodontally Healthy or Diseased by Deep Learning Algorithms

Objectives The aim of this artificial intelligence (AI) study was to develop a deep learning algorithm capable of automatically classifying periapical and bitewing radiography images as either periodontally healthy or unhealthy and to assess the algorithm's diagnostic success. Materials and methods The sample of the study consisted of 1120 periapical radiographs (560 periodontally healthy, 560 periodontally unhealthy) and 1498 bitewing radiographs (749 periodontally healthy, 749 periodontally ill). From the main datasets of both radiography types, three sub-datasets were randomly created: a training set (80%), a validation set (10%), and a test set (10%). Using these sub-datasets, a deep learning algorithm was developed with the YOLOv8-cls model (Ultralytics, Los Angeles, California, United States) and trained over 300 epochs. The success of the developed algorithm was evaluated using the confusion matrix method. Results The AI algorithm achieved classification accuracies of 75% or higher for both radiograph types. For bitewing radiographs, the sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy, and F1 score values were 0.8243, 0.7162, 0.7439, 0.7703, and 0.7821, respectively. For periapical radiographs, the sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy, and F1 score were 0.7500, 0.7500, 0.7500, 0.7500, and 0.7500, respectively. Conclusion The AI models developed in this study demonstrated considerable success in classifying periodontal disease. Future applications may involve employing AI algorithms for assessing periodontal status across various types of radiography images and for automated disease detection.

Perceptiveness and Attitude on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Dentistry among Dentists and Non-Dentists - A Regional Survey

Artificial intelligence (AI) is an emerging tool in modern medicine and the digital world. AI can help dentists diagnose oral diseases, design treatment plans, monitor patient progress and automate administrative tasks. The aim of this study is to evaluate the perception and attitude on use of artificial intelligence in dentistry for diagnosis and treatment planning among dentists and non-dentists' population of south Tamil Nadu region in India.

Materials and Methods

A cross sectional online survey conducted using 20 close ended questionnaire google forms which were circulated among the dentists and non -dentists population of south Tamil Nadu region in India. The data collected from 264 participants (dentists -158, non-dentists -106) within a limited time frame were subjected to descriptive statistical analysis.

Results

70.9% of dentists are aware of artificial intelligence in dentistry. 40.5% participants were not aware of AI in caries detection but aware of its use in interpretation of radiographs (43.9%) and in planning of orthognathic surgery (42.4%) which are statistically significant P < 0.05.44.7% support clinical experience of a human doctor better than AI diagnosis. Dentists of 54.4% agree to support AI use in dentistry.

Conclusion

The study concluded AI use in dentistry knowledge is more with dentists and perception of AI in dentistry is optimistic among dentists than non -dentists, majority of participants support AI in dentistry as an adjunct tool to diagnosis and treatment planning.

Establishing a novel deep learning model for detecting peri-implantiti

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The diagnosis of peri-implantitis using periapical radiographs is crucial. Recently, artificial intelligence may apply in radiographic image analysis effectively. The aim of this study was to differentiate the degree of marginal bone loss of an implant, and also to classify the severity of peri-implantitis using a deep learning model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A dataset of 800 periapical radiographic images were divided into training (n = 600), validation (n = 100), and test (n = 100) datasets with implants used for deep learning. An object detection algorithm (YOLOv7) was used to identify peri-implantitis. The classification performance of this model was evaluated using metrics, including the specificity, precision, recall, and F1 score.

RESULTS

Considering the classification performance, the specificity was 100%, precision was 100%, recall was 94.44%, and F1 score was 97.10%.

CONCLUSION

Results of this study suggested that implants can be identified from periapical radiographic images using deep learning-based object detection. This identification system could help dentists and patients suffering from implant problems. However, more images of other implant systems are needed to increase the learning performance to apply this system in clinical practice.

Dental radiographic changes in individuals with COVID-19: a controlled retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare the pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 dental radiological findings of individuals with positive rRT-PCR test results and with healthy controls using the apical periodontitis grade scale (APGS), radiographic-based periodontal bone loss (R-PBL), and radiographic DMFT indices, and to investigate the relatively long-term dental effects of COVID-19.

METHODS

This study included people who had two panoramic radiographs taken between 2018 and 2022. There are 52 patients with positive rRT-PCR tests in the study group. The control group included 50 individuals. Study and control groups were compared using the apical periodontitis grade scale (APGS), radiographic-based periodontal bone loss (R-PBL), and radiographic DMFT indices.

RESULTS

Although results showed a significant difference in percentage R-PBL value and R-PBL types in the study group, there was no significant difference in percentage R-PBL value and R-PBL types in the control group. Also, both groups showed a significant difference in the DMFT index.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results of this study, it can be said that COVID-19 increases the incidence of periodontitis, and it can be interpreted that the pandemic may adversely affect the general oral health of all people.

Panoramic imaging errors in machine learning model development: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the management of imaging errors from panoramic radiography (PAN) datasets used in the development of machine learning (ML) models.

METHODS

This systematic literature followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and used three databases. Keywords were selected from relevant literature.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

PAN studies that used ML models and mentioned image quality concerns.

RESULTS

Out of 400 articles, 41 papers satisfied the inclusion criteria. All the studies used ML models, with 35 papers using deep learning (DL) models. PAN quality assessment was approached in 3 ways: acknowledgement and acceptance of imaging errors in the ML model, removal of low-quality radiographs from the dataset before building the model, and application of image enhancement methods prior to model development. The criteria for determining PAN image quality varied widely across studies and were prone to bias.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed significant inconsistencies in the management of PAN imaging errors in ML research. However, most studies agree that such errors are detrimental when building ML models. More research is needed to understand the impact of low-quality inputs on model performance. Prospective studies may streamline image quality assessment by leveraging DL models, which excel at pattern recognition tasks.

Comparison between observer-based and AI-based reading of CBCT datasets: An interrater-reliability study

Objective

To assess the performance of human observers and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in detecting periodontal lesions in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), a total of 38 datasets were examined. Three human readers and a CNN-based solution were employed to evaluate the presence of periodontal pathologies in these datasets.

Materials and Methods

Datasets were acquired with a Veraview X800 L P (JMorita Mfg. Corp., Kyoto, Japan). Three general dentists, previously calibrated by a general principal investigator, read the datasets in 3D MPR mode using Horos(LGPL license at Horosproject.org and sponsored by Nimble Co LLC d/b/a Purview in Annapolis, MD, USA) as a DICOM reader. All pathological changes including vertical bone loss, furcation involvement, and periradicular osteolysis were detected. Furthermore, the same datasets were analyzed automatically by Diagnocat (Diagnocat LLC, Prague, Czech Republic), a deep CNN. Finally, the performance of the dentists and the CNN were compared and evaluated.

Results

The CNN's performance was significantly lower compared to the human readers in the search for different types of lesions. The human observers achieved good to very good interobserver agreement, except for the evaluation of the vertical lesions, which resulted in a moderate agreement.

Conclusion

The CNN used in this study was found to be ineffective in identifying periodontal lesions and was not adequately trained to offer significant assistance in the automated evaluation of periodontal lesions in CBCT datasets.

Detection of periodontal bone loss patterns and furcation defects from panoramic radiographs using deep learning algorithm: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aimed to develop a deep learning algorithm for the interpretation of panoramic radiographs and to examine the performance of this algorithm in the detection of periodontal bone losses and bone loss patterns.

METHODS

A total of 1121 panoramic radiographs were used in this study. Bone losses in the maxilla and mandibula (total alveolar bone loss) (n = 2251), interdental bone losses (n = 25303), and furcation defects (n = 2815) were labeled using the segmentation method. In addition, interdental bone losses were divided into horizontal (n = 21839) and vertical (n = 3464) bone losses according to the defect patterns. A Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based artificial intelligence (AI) system was developed using U-Net architecture. The performance of the deep learning algorithm was statistically evaluated by the confusion matrix and ROC curve analysis.

RESULTS

The system showed the highest diagnostic performance in the detection of total alveolar bone losses (AUC = 0.951) and the lowest in the detection of vertical bone losses (AUC = 0.733). The sensitivity, precision, F1 score, accuracy, and AUC values were found as 1, 0.995, 0.997, 0.994, 0.951 for total alveolar bone loss; found as 0.947, 0.939, 0.943, 0.892, 0.910 for horizontal bone losses; found as 0.558, 0.846, 0.673, 0.506, 0.733 for vertical bone losses and found as 0.892, 0.933, 0.912, 0.837, 0.868 for furcation defects (respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

AI systems offer promising results in determining periodontal bone loss patterns and furcation defects from dental radiographs. This suggests that CNN algorithms can also be used to provide more detailed information such as automatic determination of periodontal disease severity and treatment planning in various dental radiographs.

Diagnosing oral and maxillofacial diseases using deep learning

The classification and localization of odontogenic lesions from panoramic radiographs is a challenging task due to the positional biases and class imbalances of the lesions. To address these challenges, a novel neural network, DOLNet, is proposed that uses mutually influencing hierarchical attention across different image scales to jointly learn the global representation of the entire jaw and the local discrepancy between normal tissue and lesions. The proposed approach uses local attention to learn representations within a patch. From the patch-level representations, we generate inter-patch, i.e., global, attention maps to represent the positional prior of lesions in the whole image. Global attention enables the reciprocal calibration of path-level representations by considering non-local information from other patches, thereby improving the generation of whole-image-level representation. To address class imbalances, we propose an effective data augmentation technique that involves merging lesion crops with normal images, thereby synthesizing new abnormal cases for effective model training. Our approach outperforms recent studies, enhancing the classification performance by up to 42.4% and 44.2% in recall and F1 scores, respectively, and ensuring robust lesion localization with respect to lesion size variations and positional biases. Our approach further outperforms human expert clinicians in classification by 10.7 % and 10.8 % in recall and F1 score, respectively.

Convolutional neural network-based measurement of crown-implant ratio for implant-supported prostheses

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Research has revealed that the crown-implant ratio (CIR) is a critical variable influencing the long-term stability of implant-supported prostheses in the oral cavity. Nevertheless, inefficient manual measurement and varied measurement methods have caused significant inconvenience in both clinical and scientific work.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop an automated system for detecting the CIR of implant-supported prostheses from radiographs, with the objective of enhancing the efficiency of radiograph interpretation for dentists.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The method for measuring the CIR of implant-supported prostheses was based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and was designed to recognize implant-supported prostheses and identify key points around it. The experiment used the You Only Look Once version 4 (Yolov4) to locate the implant-supported prosthesis using a rectangular frame. Subsequently, two CNNs were used to identify key points. The first CNN determined the general position of the feature points, while the second CNN finetuned the output of the first network to precisely locate the key points. The network underwent testing on a self-built dataset, and the anatomic CIR and clinical CIR were obtained simultaneously through the vertical distance method. Key point accuracy was validated through Normalized Error (NE) values, and a set of data was selected to compare machine and manual measurement results. For statistical analysis, the paired t test was applied (α=.05).

RESULTS

A dataset comprising 1106 images was constructed. The integration of multiple networks demonstrated satisfactory recognition of implant-supported prostheses and their surrounding key points. The average NE value for key points indicated a high level of accuracy. Statistical studies confirmed no significant difference in the crown-implant ratio between machine and manual measurement results (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning proved effective in identifying implant-supported prostheses and detecting their crown-implant ratios. If applied as a clinical tool for analyzing radiographs, this research can assist dentists in efficiently and accurately obtaining crown-implant ratio results.

Comparison of deep learning methods for the radiographic detection of patients with different periodontitis stages

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to assess the accuracy of computer-assisted periodontal classification bone loss staging using deep learning (DL) methods on panoramic radiographs and to compare the performance of various models and layers.

METHODS

Panoramic radiographs were diagnosed and classified into 3 groups, namely "healthy," "Stage1/2," and "Stage3/4," and stored in separate folders. The feature extraction stage involved transferring and retraining the feature extraction layers and weights from 3 models, namely ResNet50, DenseNet121, and InceptionV3, which were proposed for classifying the ImageNet dataset, to 3 DL models designed for classifying periodontal bone loss. The features obtained from global average pooling (GAP), global max pooling (GMP), or flatten layers (FL) of convolutional neural network (CNN) models were used as input to the 8 different machine learning (ML) models. In addition, the features obtained from the GAP, GMP, or FL of the DL models were reduced using the minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) method and then classified again with 8 ML models.

RESULTS

A total of 2533 panoramic radiographs, including 721 in the healthy group, 842 in the Stage1/2 group, and 970 in the Stage3/4 group, were included in the dataset. The average performance values of DenseNet121 + GAP-based and DenseNet121 + GAP + mRMR-based ML techniques on 10 subdatasets and ML models developed using 2 feature selection techniques outperformed CNN models.

CONCLUSIONS

The new DenseNet121 + GAP + mRMR-based support vector machine model developed in this study achieved higher performance in periodontal bone loss classification compared to other models in the literature by detecting effective features from raw images without the need for manual selection.

Convolutional-neural-network-based radiographs evaluation assisting in early diagnosis of the periodontal bone loss via periapical radiograph

Background/Purpose

The preciseness of detecting periodontal bone loss is examiners dependent, and this leads to low reliability. The need for automated assistance systems on dental radiographic images has been increased. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have quantitatively and automatically staged periodontitis using dental periapical radiographs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate periodontal bone loss and periodontitis stage on dental periapical radiographs using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs).

Materials and methods

336 periapical radiographic images (teeth: 390) between January 2017 and December 2019 were collected and de-identified. All periapical radiographic image datasets were divided into training dataset (n = 82, teeth: 123) and test dataset (n = 336, teeth: 390). For creating an optimal deep CNN algorithm model, the training datasets were directly used for the segmentation and individual tooth detection. To evaluate the diagnostic power, we calculated the degree of alveolar bone loss deviation between our proposed method and ground truth, the Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC), and the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed method in the test datasets.

Results

The periodontal bone loss degree deviation between our proposed method and the ground truth drawn by the three periodontists was 6.5 %. In addition, the overall PCC value of our proposed system and the periodontists' diagnoses was 0.828 (P < 0.01). The total diagnostic accuracy of our proposed method was 72.8 %. The diagnostic accuracy was highest for stage III (97.0 %).

Conclusion

This tool helps with diagnosis and prevents omission, and this may be especially helpful for inexperienced younger doctors and doctors in underdeveloped countries. It could also dramatically reduce the workload of clinicians and timely access to periodontist care for people requiring advanced periodontal treatment.

Deep learning for classifying the stages of periodontitis on dental images: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The development of deep learning (DL) algorithms for use in dentistry is an emerging trend. Periodontitis is one of the most prevalent oral diseases, which has a notable impact on the life quality of patients. Therefore, it is crucial to classify periodontitis accurately and efficiently. This systematic review aimed to identify the application of DL for the classification of periodontitis and assess the accuracy of this approach.

METHODS

A literature search up to November 2023 was implemented through EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to screen eligible studies, and the quality of the studies was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology with the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) tool. Random-effects inverse-variance model was used to perform the meta-analysis of a diagnostic test, with which pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR), negative LR, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated, and a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) plot was constructed.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. After excluding an outlier, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive LR, negative LR and DOR were 0.88 (95%CI 0.82-0.92), 0.82 (95%CI 0.72-0.89), 4.9 (95%CI 3.2-7.5), 0.15 (95%CI 0.10-0.22) and 33 (95%CI 19-59), respectively. The area under the SROC was 0.92 (95%CI 0.89-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of DL-based classification of periodontitis is high, and this approach could be employed in the future to reduce the workload of dental professionals and enhance the consistency of classification.

Applying artificial intelligence to detect and analyse oral and maxillofacial bone loss-A scoping review

Radiographic evaluation of bone changes is one of the main tools in the diagnosis of many oral and maxillofacial diseases. However, this approach to assessment has limitations in accuracy, inconsistency and comparatively low diagnostic efficiency. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms like deep learning networks have been introduced as a solution to overcome these challenges. Based on recent studies, AI can improve the detection accuracy of an expert clinician for periapical pathology, periodontal diseases and their prognostication, as well as peri-implant bone loss. Also, AI has been successfully used to detect and diagnose oral and maxillofacial lesions with a high predictive value. This study aims to review the current evidence on artificial intelligence applications in the detection and analysis of bone loss in the oral and maxillofacial regions.

Artificial intelligence models for diagnosing gingivitis and periodontal disease: A systematic review

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Artificial intelligence (AI) models have been developed for periodontal applications, including diagnosing gingivitis and periodontal disease, but their accuracy and maturity of the technology remain unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the performance of the AI models for detecting dental plaque and diagnosing gingivitis and periodontal disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A review was performed in 4 databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, World of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus. A manual search was also conducted. Studies were classified into 4 groups: detecting dental plaque, diagnosis of gingivitis, diagnosis of periodontal disease from intraoral images, and diagnosis of alveolar bone loss from periapical, bitewing, and panoramic radiographs. Two investigators evaluated the studies independently by applying the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal. A third examiner was consulted to resolve any lack of consensus.

RESULTS

Twenty-four articles were included: 2 studies developed AI models for detecting plaque, resulting in accuracy ranging from 73.6% to 99%; 7 studies assessed the ability to diagnose gingivitis from intraoral photographs reporting an accuracy between 74% and 78.20%; 1 study used fluorescent intraoral images to diagnose gingivitis reporting 67.7% to 73.72% accuracy; 3 studies assessed the ability to diagnose periodontal disease from intraoral photographs with an accuracy between 47% and 81%, and 11 studies evaluated the performance of AI models for detecting alveolar bone loss from radiographic images reporting an accuracy between 73.4% and 99%.

CONCLUSIONS

AI models for periodontology applications are still in development but might provide a powerful diagnostic tool.

Deep learning for the early identification of periodontitis: a retrospective, multicentre study

AIM

To develop a deep-learning model to help general dental practitioners diagnose periodontitis accurately and at an early stage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

First, the panoramic radiographs (PARs) from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were input into the convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture to establish the PAR-CNN model for healthy controls and periodontitis patients. Then, the PARs from the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine were included in the second testing set to validate the effectiveness of the model with data from two centres. Heat maps were produced using a gradient-weighted class activation mapping method to visualise the regions of interest of the model. The accuracy and time required to read the PARs were compared between the model, periodontal experts, and general dental practitioners. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were used to evaluate the performance of the model.

RESULTS

The AUC of the PAR-CNN model was 0.843, and the AUC of the second test set was 0.793. The heat map showed that the regions of interest predicted by the model were periodontitis bone lesions. The accuracy of the model, periodontal experts, and general dental practitioners was 0.800, 0.813, and 0.693, respectively. The time required to read each PAR by periodontal experts (6.042 ± 1.148 seconds) and general dental practitioners (13.105 ± 3.153 seconds), which was significantly longer than the time required by the model (0.027 ± 0.002 seconds).

CONCLUSION

The ability of the CNN model to diagnose periodontitis approached the level of periodontal experts. Deep-learning methods can assist general dental practitioners to diagnose periodontitis quickly and accurately.

Automatized Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs by Vision Transformer Networks

Several artificial intelligence-based models have been presented for the detection of periodontal bone loss (PBL), mostly using convolutional neural networks, which are the state of the art in deep learning. Given the emerging breakthrough of transformer networks in computer vision, we aimed to evaluate various models for automatized PBL detection. An image data set of 21,819 anonymized periapical radiographs from the upper/lower and anterior/posterior regions was assessed by calibrated dentists according to PBL. Five vision transformer networks (ViT-base/ViT-large from Google, BEiT-base/BEiT-large from Microsoft, DeiT-base from Facebook/Meta) were utilized and evaluated. Accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive/negative predictive value (PPV/NPV) and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were statistically determined. The overall diagnostic ACC and AUC values ranged from 83.4 to 85.2% and 0.899 to 0.918 for all evaluated transformer networks, respectively. Differences in diagnostic performance were evident for lower (ACC 94.1-96.7%; AUC 0.944-0.970) and upper anterior (86.7-90.2%; 0.948-0.958) and lower (85.6-87.2%; 0.913-0.937) and upper posterior teeth (78.1-81.0%; 0.851-0.875). In this study, only minor differences among the tested networks were detected for PBL detection. To increase the diagnostic performance and to support the clinical use of such networks, further optimisations with larger and manually annotated image data sets are needed.

Current Progress and Challenges of Using Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Dentistry-A Narrative Review

The concept of machines learning and acting like humans is what is meant by the phrase "artificial intelligence" (AI). Several branches of dentistry are increasingly relying on artificial intelligence (AI) tools. The literature usually focuses on AI models. These AI models have been used to detect and diagnose a wide range of conditions, including, but not limited to, dental caries, vertical root fractures, apical lesions, diseases of the salivary glands, maxillary sinusitis, maxillofacial cysts, cervical lymph node metastasis, osteoporosis, cancerous lesions, alveolar bone loss, the need for orthodontic extractions or treatments, cephalometric analysis, age and gender determination, and more. The primary contemporary applications of AI in the dental field are in undergraduate teaching and research. Before these methods can be used in everyday dentistry, however, the underlying technology and user interfaces need to be refined.

Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs-A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks

Interest in machine learning models and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for diagnostic purposes is steadily increasing in dentistry. Here, CNNs can potentially help in the classification of periodontal bone loss (PBL). In this study, the diagnostic performance of five CNNs in detecting PBL on periapical radiographs was analyzed. A set of anonymized periapical radiographs (N = 21,819) was evaluated by a group of trained and calibrated dentists and classified into radiographs without PBL or with mild, moderate, or severe PBL. Five CNNs were trained over five epochs. Statistically, diagnostic performance was analyzed using accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Here, overall ACC ranged from 82.0% to 84.8%, SE 88.8-90.7%, SP 66.2-71.2%, and AUC 0.884-0.913, indicating similar diagnostic performance of the five CNNs. Furthermore, performance differences were evident in the individual sextant groups. Here, the highest values were found for the mandibular anterior teeth (ACC 94.9-96.0%) and the lowest values for the maxillary posterior teeth (78.0-80.7%). It can be concluded that automatic assessment of PBL seems to be possible, but that diagnostic accuracy varies depending on the location in the dentition. Future research is needed to improve performance for all tooth groups.

The role of deep learning for periapical lesion detection on panoramic radiographs

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to detect automatically periapical lesion on panoramic radiographs (PRs) using deep learning.

METHODS

454 objects in 357 PRs were anonymized and manually labeled. They are then pre-processed to improve image quality and enhancement purposes. The data were randomly assigned into the training, validation, and test folders with ratios of 0.8, 0.1, and 0.1, respectively. The state-of-art 10 different deep learning-based detection frameworks including various backbones were applied to periapical lesion detection problem. Model performances were evaluated by mean average precision, accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, precision-recall curves, area under curve and several other Common Objects in Context detection evaluation metrics.

RESULTS

Deep learning-based detection frameworks were generally successful in detecting periapical lesions on PRs. Detection performance, mean average precision, varied between 0.832 and 0.953 while accuracy was between 0.673 and 0.812 for all models. F1 score was between 0.8 and 0.895. RetinaNet performed the best detection performance, similarly Adaptive Training Sample Selection provided F1 score of 0.895 as highest value. Testing with external data supported our findings.

CONCLUSION

This work showed that deep learning models can reliably detect periapical lesions on PRs. Artificial intelligence-based on deep learning tools are revolutionizing dental healthcare and can help both clinicians and dental healthcare system.

Deep learning and clustering approaches for dental implant size classification based on periapical radiographs

This study investigated two artificial intelligence (AI) methods for automatically classifying dental implant diameter and length based on periapical radiographs. The first method, deep learning (DL), involved utilizing the pre-trained VGG16 model and adjusting the fine-tuning degree to analyze image data obtained from periapical radiographs. The second method, clustering analysis, was accomplished by analyzing the implant-specific feature vector derived from three key points coordinates of the dental implant using the k-means++ algorithm and adjusting the weight of the feature vector. DL and clustering model classified dental implant size into nine groups. The performance metrics of AI models were accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). The final DL model yielded performances above 0.994, 0.950, 0.994, 0.974, 0.952, 0.994, and 0.975, respectively, and the final clustering model yielded performances above 0.983, 0.900, 0.988, 0.923, 0.909, 0.988, and 0.947, respectively. When comparing the AI model before tuning and the final AI model, statistically significant performance improvements were observed in six out of nine groups for DL models and four out of nine groups for clustering models based on AUC-ROC. Two AI models showed reliable classification performances. For clinical applications, AI models require validation on various multicenter data.

Teeth and prostheses detection in dental panoramic X-rays using CNN-based object detector and a priori knowledge-based algorithm

Deep learning techniques for automatically detecting teeth in dental X-rays have gained popularity, providing valuable assistance to healthcare professionals. However, teeth detection in X-ray images is often hindered by alterations in tooth appearance caused by dental prostheses. To address this challenge, our paper proposes a novel method for teeth detection and numbering in dental panoramic X-rays, leveraging two separate CNN-based object detectors, namely YOLOv7, for detecting teeth and prostheses, alongside an optimization algorithm to refine the outcomes. The study utilizes a dataset of 3138 radiographs, of which 2553 images contain prostheses, to build a robust model. The tooth and prosthesis detection algorithms perform excellently, achieving mean average precisions of 0.982 and 0.983, respectively. Additionally, the trained tooth detection model is verified using an external dataset, and six-fold cross-validation is conducted to demonstrate the proposed method's feasibility and robustness. Moreover, the investigation of performance improvement resulting from the inclusion of prosthesis information in the teeth detection process reveals a marginal increase in the average F1-score, rising from 0.985 to 0.987 compared to the sole teeth detection method. The proposed method is unique in its approach to numbering teeth as it incorporates prosthesis information and considers complete restorations such as dental implants and dentures of fixed bridges during the teeth enumeration process, which follows the universal tooth numbering system. These advancements hold promise for automating dental charting processes.

Revolutionizing Dental Care: A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications Among Various Dental Specialties

Since the beginning of recorded history, the human brain has been one of the most intriguing structures for scientists and engineers. Over the centuries, newer technologies have been developed based on principles that seek to mimic their functioning, but the creation of a machine that can think and behave like a human remains an unattainable fantasy. This idea is now known as "artificial intelligence". Dentistry has begun to experience the effects of artificial intelligence (AI). These include image enhancement for radiology, which improves the visibility of dental structures and facilitates disease diagnosis. AI has also been utilized for the identification of periapical lesions and root anatomy in endodontics, as well as for the diagnosis of periodontitis. This review is intended to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of AI in modern dentistry's numerous specialties. The relevant publications published between March 1987 and July 2023 were identified through an exhaustive search. Studies published in English were selected and included data regarding AI applications among various dental specialties. Dental practice involves more than just disease diagnosis, including correlation with clinical findings and administering treatment to patients. AI cannot replace dentists. However, a comprehensive understanding of AI concepts and techniques will be advantageous in the future. AI models for dental applications are currently being developed.

Machine learning techniques for periodontitis and dental caries detection: A narrative review

OBJECTIVES

In recent years, periodontitis, and dental caries have become common in humans and need to be diagnosed in the early stage to prevent severe complications and tooth loss. These dental issues are diagnosed by visual inspection, measuring pocket probing depth, and radiographs findings from experienced dentists. Though a glut of machine learning (ML) algorithms has been proposed for the automated detection of periodontitis, and dental caries, determining which ML techniques are suitable for clinical practice remains under debate. This review aims to identify the research challenges by analyzing the limitations of current methods and how to address these to obtain robust systems suitable for clinical use or point-of-care testing.

METHODS

An extensive search of the literature published from 2015 to 2022 written in English, related to the subject of study was sought by searching the electronic databases: PubMed, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore, and ScienceDirect.

RESULTS

The initial electronic search yielded 1743 titles, and 55 studies were eventually included based on the selection criteria adopted in this review. Studies selected were on ML applications for the automatic detection of periodontitis and dental caries and related dental issues: Apical lessons, Periodontal bone loss, and Vertical root fracture.

CONCLUSION

While most of the ML-based studies use radiograph images for the detection of periodontitis and dental caries, few pieces of the literature revealed that good diagnostic accuracy could be achieved by training the ML model even with mobile photos representing the images of dental issues. Nowadays smartphones are used in every sector for different applications. Training the ML model with as many images of dental issues captured by the smartphone can achieve good accuracy, reduce the cost of clinical diagnosis, and provide user interaction.

Denoised encoder-based residual U-net for precise teeth image segmentation and damage prediction on panoramic radiographs

OBJECTIVES

This research focuses on performing teeth segmentation with panoramic radiograph images using a denoised encoder-based residual U-Net model, which enhances segmentation techniques and has the capacity to adapt to predictions with different and new data in the dataset, making the proposed model more robust and assisting in the accurate identification of damages in individual teeth.

METHODS

The effective segmentation starts with pre-processing the Tufts dataset to resize images to avoid computational complexities. Subsequently, the prediction of the defect in teeth is performed with the denoised encoder block in the residual U-Net model, in which a modified identity block is provided in the encoder section for finer segmentation on specific regions in images, and features are identified optimally. The denoised block aids in handling noisy ground truth images effectively.

RESULTS

Proposed module achieved greater values of mean dice and mean IoU with 98.90075 and 98.74147 CONCLUSIONS: Proposed AI enabled model permitted a precise approach to segment the teeth on Tuffs dental dataset in spite of the existence of densed dental filling and the kind of tooth.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The proposed model is pivotal for improved dental diagnostics, offering precise identification of dental anomalies. This could revolutionize clinical dental settings by facilitating more accurate treatments and safer examination processes with lower radiation exposure, thus enhancing overall patient care.