Risk of Kidney Dysfunction from Polypharmacy among Older Patients: A Nested Case-Control Study of the South Korean Senior Cohort

What is Polypharmacy in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease? A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Polypharmacy presents an increasing therapeutic challenge for physicians managing patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the specific medication count threshold that defines polypharmacy in this population. The objective of this review is to establish a unified definition of polypharmacy in the CKD population by examining the diverse definitions used in previously published studies.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in relevant databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane, and disease-specific databases) from 2000 to May 2022 to identify studies with polypharmacy threshold definitions in patients with CKD. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included in this review, and their methodologic quality was assessed.

FINDINGS

Following the screening of the search results, duplicate records and studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria were removed, resulting in a total of 18 studies included in this review. Among these, 61.1% specified the polypharmacy definition to be a threshold of ≥5 medications. In addition, 22.2% specified a high polypharmacy definition at a threshold of ≥10 medications. However, none of the studies reported on the dichotomy between kidney-related and non-kidney-related polypharmacy.

IMPLICATIONS

This review indicates that a numerical threshold of ≥5 medications is commonly used to define polypharmacy in patients with CKD. Nevertheless, it remains uncertain whether a kidney-related polypharmacy definition or a high polypharmacy definition would better identify patients with CKD at risk for polypharmacy-related complications.

Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a single-centre, cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify factors associated with polypharmacy, including social aspects, among patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

We conducted this single-centre, cross-sectional study at a 715-bed regional tertiary care teaching hospital in Japan from 1 September to 30 November 2020. Polypharmacy was defined as having five or more medications administered orally regularly, and excessive polypharmacy was defined as having 10 or more medications administered orally regularly. The prevalence of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy, distribution of medication types, and factors associated with polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were investigated among patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

RESULTS

The proportions of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were 61% and 15%, respectively, in 991 patients. Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were associated with older age (odds ratio, 1.03 and 1.03, respectively), high Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (odds ratio, 1.45 and 2.03, respectively), medication with glucocorticoids (odds ratio, 5.57 and 2.42, respectively), high Charlson comorbidity index (odds ratio, 1.28 and 1.36, respectively), and a history of hospitalisation in internal medicine (odds ratio, 1.92 and 1.87, respectively) and visits to other internal medicine clinics (odds ratio, 2.93 and 2.03, respectively). Moreover, excessive polypharmacy was associated with the presence of public assistance (odds ratio, 3.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering that polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy are associated with a history of hospitalisation and glucocorticoid medication in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, medications during hospitalisation should be monitored, and glucocorticoids should be discontinued. Key points • The proportion of polypharmacy (five or more medications administered orally regularly) was 61%. • The proportion of excessive polypharmacy (10 or more medications administered orally regularly) was 15%. • Medications during hospitalisation should be reviewed and examined, and glucocorticoids should be discontinued.

Association of polypharmacy with incidence of CKD: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with a decline in kidney function. However, its impact on patients without CKD has not been adequately elucidated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between polypharmacy and the incidence of CKD.

METHODS

We conducted retrospective cohort study using 1221 participants who were enrolled in the Fukushima Cohort Study with one or more risk factors of CKD, an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m², and without proteinuria. Participants were categorized into three groups based on the number of medications: non-polypharmacy, 0-4 medications; polypharmacy, 5-9 medications; and hyper-polypharmacy, ≥ 10 medications.

RESULTS

The median age was 62 years, 49% were men, the median eGFR was 75.4 ml/min/1.73 m², and the median number of medications was 5. Polypharmacy and hyper-polypharmacy were noted in 506 (41%) and 250 (20%) participants, respectively. During follow-up, 288 participants developed CKD and 67 cardiovascular events were observed. Compared to the non-polypharmacy group, the hyper-polypharmacy group had a higher risk of CKD and cardiovascular events. The adjusted hazard ratios were 1.41 (95% CI1.01-1.99) and 2.24 (95% CI1.05-4.78) for the incidence of CKD and cardiovascular events, respectively. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar findings for the restricted cubic spline function models.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyper-polypharmacy is associated with a higher risk of CKD and cardiovascular events.

Potentially inappropriate medication among older patients with diabetic kidney disease

Objective: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) contribute to poor outcomes in older patients, making it a widespread health problem. The study explored the occurrence and risk factors of PIM in older diabetic kidney disease (DKD) patients during hospitalization and investigated whether polypharmacy was associated with it. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the patients ≥ 65 years old diagnosed with DKD from July to December 2020; the PIM was evaluated according to the American Beers Criteria (2019). Factors with statistical significance in univariate analysis were included in Logistic multivariate analysis to explore the potential risk factors related to PIM. Results: Included 186 patients, 65.6% of patients had PIM, and 300 items were confirmed. The highest incidence of PIM was 41.7% for drugs that should be carefully used by the older, followed by 35.3% that should be avoided during hospitalization. The incidence of PIM related to diseases or symptoms, drug interactions to avoid, and drugs to avoid or reduce dose for renal insufficiency patients were 6.3%, 4.0% and 12.7%, respectively. The medications with a high incidence of PIM were diuretics (35.0%), benzodiazepines (10.7%) and peripheral ɑ1 blockers (8.7%). Compared with hospitalization, there were 26% of patients had increased PIM at discharge. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that polypharmacy during hospitalization was an independent risk factor for PIM, OR = 4.471 (95% CI: 2.378, 8.406). Conclusion: The incidence of PIM in hospitalized older DKD patients is high; we should pay more attention to the problem of polypharmacy in these patients. Pharmacists identifying the subtypes and risk factors for PIM may facilitate risk reduction for older DKD patients.

Geriatric Medicine Principles in Conservative Kidney Management: Frailty, Functional Assessments, and Selective Deprescribing

Conservative kidney management is a nondialytic treatment option for advanced chronic kidney disease that involves interventions to delay kidney function loss, medications to treat symptoms, and psychosocial support for patients and their loved ones. Several geriatric medicine principles are applicable to patients who are considering or receiving conservative kidney management, including the integration of physical, psychological, and social factors into medical care and medical decisions; careful review of medication lists with selective deprescribing; and screening for geriatric syndromes such as frailty and functional impairment. In this review, we discuss how functional and frailty assessments as well as selective deprescribing can be useful for patients considering or receiving conservative kidney management.

Polypharmacy, chronic kidney disease, and mortality among older adults: A prospective study of National Health and nutrition examination survey, 1999-2018

Introduction

Polypharmacy might contribute to a range of adverse outcomes, which could get worse in the elderly with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Evidence on polypharmacy, CKD, and mortality is scarce. We aimed to investigate the prospective association between polypharmacy, CKD and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in adults aged ≥65 years.

Methods

A total of 13,513 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys were included, following up from 1999 to 2018 until December 31, 2019. The simultaneous use of ≥5 medications by one individual was defined as polypharmacy. Survey-weighted Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HRs) for mortality from all-cause, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and cancer after adjusting for potential confounding factors.

Results

Among the elderly with CKD, we identified 3,825 total deaths (1,325 CVD and 714 cancer) during a median follow-up of 7.7 years. Participants with polypharmacy had a 27% (HR = 1.27 [1.15, 1.39]) and 39% (HR = 1.39 [1.19, 1.62]) higher risk of all-cause and CVD mortality, respectively, but not for cancer mortality. Compared with the elderly with no polypharmacy and no CKD, the corresponding HRs (95%CIs) for all-cause mortality were 1.04 (0.96, 1.14) for those with no polypharmacy but CKD, 1.24 (1.11, 1.39) for with polypharmacy but no CKD, and 1.34 (1.21, 1.49) for those with both polypharmacy and CKD. A similar pattern was detected for CVD mortality.

Discussion

Polypharmacy was associated with elevated risks of all-cause and CVD mortality among the elderly CKD patients. More evidence-based approaches should be promoted for the appropriate deprescribing in the older adults with CKD.

Safety of Mexidol® (ethylmethylhydroxypyridine succinate) in adult patients of different age groups

To reduce the risk of developing adverse events (AEs) and increase the adherence of elderly patients to treatment, it is recommended to limit maximally the total number of prescribed drugs (DR), using one drug for the treatment of two or more pathologies if possible. The drugs that meet the criteria for use in elderly patients and / or patients with comorbidity include the original Russian drug Mexidol® (ethylmethylhydroxypyridine succinate), which has a multimodal mechanism of action and has multiple pharmacological effects. In order to study the safety of Mexidol in comparison with placebo in different age groups of patients with chronic cerebral ischemia, a post hoc analysis of the international multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled MEMO study with an adaptive design was carried out, which assessed the efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with Mexidol®, a solution for intravenous and intramuscular injection, 50 mg/ml (NPK PHARMASOFT, Russia) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 film-coated tablets, 250 mg (NPK PHARMASOFT, Russia) in patients with chronic cerebral ischemia. The study involved 318 patients aged from 40 to 90 years.

Comparable safety and tolerability of Mexidol was demonstrated in middle-aged and elderly people with chronic cerebral ischemia, including patients over 75 years of age. 

Calidad de vida asociada con polifarmacia en personas con lesiones cutáneas crónicas

Objetivo:

Analizar la asociación entre el uso de polifarmacia y la calidad de vida de personas con lesiones cutáneas crónicas.

Método:

Estudio transversal con una muestra conformada por 146 personas afectadas por lesiones cutáneas crónicas, vinculadas con la atención primaria de salud. La recolección de datos se realizó entre julio de 2017 y febrero de 2018. La información se recopiló mediante un cuestionario sociodemográfico y el cuestionario Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule (CWIS).

Resultados:

Hubo predominio de hipertensión arterial sistémica en 86 personas (58,9%) y de diabetes mellitus en 50 (34,2%). La etiología de la lesión cutánea predominante fue vasculogénica (38,4%), y se identificó polifarmacia en el 46,7% de los pacientes. En el cuestionario CWIS, el dominio con el puntaje promedio más bajo fue el bienestar (promedio de 46,2±17,9). Hubo asociación estadísticamente significativa (p<0.05) entre polifarmacia y las siguientes variables: dominio de “síntomas físicos/vida diaria", dominio de “vida social” y “autosatisfacción con la calidad de vida".

Conclusión:

La polifarmacia está asociada con un detrimento en la calidad de vida de personas con lesiones cutáneas crónicas. Por lo tanto, los profesionales de la salud que trabajan en la atención primaria deberían considerar la terapia farmacológica en sus planes de atención, coordinar con asistencia médica y farmacéutica la elaboración de estrategias de monitoreo de los riesgos que involucran la polifarmacia, y evaluar sus impactos en la calidad de vida.

Conflicto de interés:

Ninguno.

Calidad de vida asociada con polifarmacia en personas con lesiones cutáneas crónicas

Objetivo:

Analizar la asociación entre el uso de polifarmacia y la calidad de vida de personas con lesiones cutáneas crónicas.

Método:

Estudio transversal con una muestra conformada por 146 personas afectadas por lesiones cutáneas crónicas, vinculadas con la atención primaria de salud. La recolección de datos se realizó entre julio de 2017 y febrero de 2018. La información se recopiló mediante un cuestionario sociodemográfico y el cuestionario Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule (CWIS).

Resultados:

Hubo predominio de hipertensión arterial sistémica en 86 personas (58,9%) y de diabetes mellitus en 50 (34,2%). La etiología de la lesión cutánea predominante fue vasculogénica (38,4%), y se identificó polifarmacia en el 46,7% de los pacientes. En el cuestionario CWIS, el dominio con el puntaje promedio más bajo fue el bienestar (promedio de 46,2±17,9). Hubo asociación estadísticamente significativa (p<0.05) entre polifarmacia y las siguientes variables: dominio de “síntomas físicos/vida diaria", dominio de “vida social” y “autosatisfacción con la calidad de vida".

Conclusión:

La polifarmacia está asociada con un detrimento en la calidad de vida de personas con lesiones cutáneas crónicas. Por lo tanto, los profesionales de la salud que trabajan en la atención primaria deberían considerar la terapia farmacológica en sus planes de atención, coordinar con asistencia médica y farmacéutica la elaboración de estrategias de monitoreo de los riesgos que involucran la polifarmacia, y evaluar sus impactos en la calidad de vida.

Conflicto de interés:

Ninguno.

Association of Polypharmacy with Kidney Disease Progression in Adults with CKD

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Polypharmacy is common in patients with CKD and reportedly associated with adverse outcomes. However, its effect on kidney outcomes among patients with CKD has not been adequately elucidated. Hence, this investigation was aimed at exploring the association between polypharmacy and kidney failure requiring KRT.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS

We retrospectively examined 1117 participants (median age, 66 years; 56% male; median eGFR, 48 ml/min per 1.73 m²) enrolled in the Fukushima CKD Cohort Study to investigate the association between the number of prescribed medications and adverse outcomes such as kidney failure, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular events in Japanese patients with nondialysis-dependent CKD. Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy were defined as the regular use of 5-9 and ≥10 medications per day, respectively.

RESULTS

The median number of medications was eight; the prevalence of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy was each 38%. During the observation period (median, 4.8 years), 120 developed kidney failure, 153 developed cardiovascular events, and 109 died. Compared with the use of fewer than five medications, adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) associated with polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy were 2.28 (1.00 to 5.21) and 2.83 (1.21 to 6.66) for kidney failure, 1.60 (0.85 to 3.04) and 3.02 (1.59 to 5.74) for cardiovascular events, and 1.25 (0.62 to 2.53) and 2.80 (1.41 to 5.54) for all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a high number of medications was associated with a high risk of kidney failure, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality in Japanese patients with nondialysis-dependent CKD under nephrology care.

Effectiveness of polypharmacy reduction policy in Japan: nationwide retrospective observational study

Background Polypharmacy is an important global health issue. In Japan, an amended policy has been implemented since April 2016 to offer incentives that allow claiming a payment of approximately 22.5 US$ per patient to hospitals and clinics that succeed to reduce two or more medications. However, there is no evidence on the nationwide effectiveness of polypharmacy reduction policy. Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of the polypharmacy reduction policy in Japan using nationwide outpatient prescription fee reimbursement claims data in Open Data of the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan. Method This nationwide retrospective observational study was conducted over 3 years (April 2015 to March 2018). The primary outcome was the polypharmacy reduction ratio calculated by the polypharmacy proportion. Factors associated with policy effectiveness were identified by performing a multiple linear regression analysis using independent variables. Results After implementing the new policy, a 7.3 % polypharmacy reduction ratio was observed, particularly in the elderly (8.2 %). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the proportion of elderly residents (aged ≥65 years), number of hospitals per 100,000 residents, and number of clinics per 100,000 residents were statistically significantly associated with this reduction. Conclusion The polypharmacy reduction policy indicated an association with polypharmacy reduction in Japan. The proportion of elderly residents and availability of hospitals and clinics are important factors to enhance the effectiveness of the polypharmacy reduction policy.

Polypharmacy and the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease: Korean Cohort Study for Outcome in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

INTRODUCTION

The renal hazard of polypharmacy has never been evaluated in predialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to analyze the renal hazard of polypharmacy in predialysis CKD patients with stage 1-5.

METHOD

The data of 2,238 patients from a large-scale multicenter prospective Korean study (2011-2016), excluding 325 patients with various missing data, were reviewed. Polypharmacy was defined as taking 6 or more medications at the time of enrollment; renal events were defined as a ≥50% decrease in kidney function from baseline values, doubling of the serum creatinine levels, or initiation of renal replacement treatment. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using Cox proportional-hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 1,913 patients, the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 53.6 mL/min/1.73 m2. The mean medication count was 4.1, and the prevalence of polypharmacy was 27.1%. During the average period of 3.6 years, 520 patients developed renal events (27.2%). Although increased medication counts were associated with increased renal hazard with HR (95% CI) of 1.056 (1.007-1.107, p = 0.025), even after adjusting for various confounders, adding comorbidity score and kidney function nullified the statistical significance. In mediation analysis, 55.6% (p = 0.016) of renal hazard in increased medication counts was mediated by the kidney function, and there was no direct effect of medication counts on renal event development. In subgroup analysis, the renal hazard of the medication counts was evident only in stage 1-3 of CKD patients (p for interaction = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

We cannot identify the direct renal hazard of multiple medications, and most of the potential renal hazard was derived from intimate relationship with disease burden and kidney function.

Influencing factors and their relationships of risk perception and decision-making behaviour of polypharmacy in patients with chronic diseases: a qualitative descriptive study

OBJECTIVES

In order to understand the influencing factors of the medication-taking behaviour in patients with chronic diseases, reveal the deep-seated causes underlying the phenomenon of polypharmacy, explore the formation rules of the risk perception of polypharmacy and how risk perception affect the medication decision-making behaviour of patients with chronic diseases.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive design was used. Study data were collected through semi-structured interviews with patients and physicians. We used the grounded theory approach to refine influencing factors, followed by interpretative structural modelling that analysed the interaction between these factors.

SETTING

Patients from two hospitals, two nursing homes and two communities. Physicians from two community hospitals in Wuhan, China.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with chronic diseases with high willingness to cooperate and good communication ability. Physicians with rich experience in the treatment of chronic diseases.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine interviews were conducted (20 patients and 9 physicians). A total of 35 influencing factors of the medication-taking behaviours in patients with chronic diseases were extracted from the interview data, further integrated into 10 integrated influencing factors and ultimately clustered into three aspects: 'medication benefit', 'medication risk' and 'medication strategy'. Medication risk can be divided into four specific dimensions: economic risk, physical risk, psychosocial risk and time risk. 10 integrated influencing factors constituted the interpretative structural model of the medication decision-making behaviours in patients with chronic diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

The causes underlying the medication decision-making behaviour of patients with chronic diseases are complex, involving a series of influencing factors such as their risk perception of the medication-taking behaviour. In order to alleviate the adverse effects of polypharmacy on patients' health and medical costs, further safety measures should be proposed to improve the medication-taking behaviour in patients with chronic diseases based on the relationship and internal mechanism of the influencing factors of the medication decision-making behaviour.

Onset of Hyperkalemia following the Administration of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker

Introduction

In spite of the established importance of detecting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker- (ARB-) induced hyperkalemia, there have not been many studies on the time of its occurrence.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed electronic medical records to determine the onset time and incidence rate of hyperkalemia (serum potassium > 5.5 mEq/L or 6.0 mEq/L) among hospitalized patients newly started on a 15-day ACEI or ARB therapy.

Results

Among 3101 hospitalized patients, hyperkalemia incidence was 0.5%–0.9% and 0.8%–2.1% in the ACEI and ARB groups, respectively. However, it was not significantly different among different ARB types. Hyperkalemia's onset was distributed throughout 15 days, without any trend. Hyperkalemia incidence was 7.3 and 35.1 times higher at 5.5 mEq/L (hazard ratio (HR) = 7.31, 95%confidence interval (CI) = 4.19–12.76, p < 0.001) and 6.0 mEq/L (HR = 35.11, 95%CI = 8.25–149.52, p < 0.001), respectively, than the baseline creatinine level. Hyperkalemia incidence in patients with chronic renal failure was 5.7 and 9.2 times higher at 5.5 mEq/L (HR = 5.72, 95%CI = 3.24–10.12, p < 0.001) and 6.0 mEq/L (HR = 9.16, 95%CI = 4.02–20.88, p < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions

It is unlikely that it is necessary to monitor hyperkalemia immediately after administration of ACEI or ARB. However, when prescribed for patients with abnormal kidney function, clinicians should always consider the possibility of developing hyperkalemia.