Evaluation of the dose-related concentration approach in therapeutic drug monitoring of diuretics and β-blockers - drug classes with low adherence in antihypertensive therapy

Towards clinical adherence monitoring of oral endocrine breast cancer therapies by LC-HRMS-method development, validation, comparison of four sample matrices, and proof of concept

Oral endocrine therapies (OET) for breast cancer treatment need to be taken over a long period of time and are associated with considerable side effects. Therefore, adherence to OET is an important issue and of high clinical significance for breast cancer patients' caregivers. We hypothesized that a new bioanalytical strategy based on liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry might be suitable for unbiased adherence monitoring (AM) of OET. Four different biomatrices (plasma, urine, finger prick blood by volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), oral fluid (OF)) were evaluated regarding their suitability for AM of the OET abemaciclib, anastrozole, exemestane, letrozole, palbociclib, ribociclib, tamoxifen, and endoxifen. An analytical method was developed and validated according to international recommendations. The analytical procedures were successfully validated in all sample matrices for most analytes, even meeting requirements for therapeutic drug monitoring. Chromatographic separation of analytes was achieved in less than 10 min and limits of quantification ranged from 1 to 1000 ng/mL. The analysis of 25 matching patient samples showed that AM of OET is possible using all four matrices with the exception of, e.g., letrozole and exemestane in OF. We were able to show that unbiased bioanalytical AM of OET was possible using different biomatrices with distinct restrictions. Sample collection of VAMS was difficult in most cases due to circulatory restraints and peripheral neuropathy in fingers and OF sampling was hampered by dry mouth syndrome in some cases. Although parent compounds could be detected in most of the urine samples, metabolites should be included when analyzing urine or OF. Plasma is currently the most suitable matrix due to available reference concentrations.

Sample Matrices for Mass Spectrometry-Based Adherence Monitoring: A Systematic Critical Review

BACKGROUND

Analytical monitoring of adherence using mass spectrometry (MS) plays an important role in clinical toxicology. Unambiguous detection of drugs (of abuse) and/or their metabolites in body fluids is needed to monitor intake of medication as prescribed or to monitor abstinence as a follow-up to detoxification procedures. This study focused on the advantages and disadvantages of different sample matrices used for MS-based adherence monitoring.

METHODS

Relevant articles were identified through a literature search in the PubMed database. English articles published between January 01, 2017, and December 31, 2022, were selected using the keywords "adherence assess*" or "adherence monit*" or "compliance assess*" or "compliance monit*" in combination with "mass spectrom*" in the title or abstract.

RESULTS

A total of 51 articles were identified, 37 of which were within the scope of this study. MS-based monitoring was shown to improve patient adherence to prescribed drugs. However, MS analysis may not be able to assess whether treatment was rigorously followed beyond the last few days before the sampling event, except when hair is the sample matrix. For medication adherence monitoring, blood-based analyses may be preferred because reference plasma concentrations are usually available, whereas for abstinence control, urine and hair samples have the advantage of extended detection windows compared with blood. Alternative sample matrices, such as dried blood samples, oral fluid, and exhaled breath, are suitable for at-home sampling; however, little information is available regarding the pharmacokinetics and reference ranges of drug (of abuse) concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Each sample matrix has strengths and weaknesses, and no single sample matrix can be considered the gold standard for monitoring adherence. It is important to have sufficient information regarding the pharmacokinetics of target substances to select a sample matrix in accordance with the desired purpose.

Development of an immunochromatographic assay for the rapid screening of torasemide in health food

Torasemide is a new loop diuretic agent added illegally to health foods for weight loss, which can result in serious health risks for consumers. A rapid and sensitive immunochromatographic assay for detection of torasemide (ICA) based on a new monoclonal antibody (mAb) was developed. The mAb IC50 for torasemide was 0.93 ng/mL, and the mAb did not cross-react with other analogues. In PBS, the cut-off value and limit of detection were 1 ng/mL and 0.11 ng/mL, respectively, with a linear range between 0.61 and 6.13 ng/mL. In slimming tablet and capsule samples, the cut-off value was 5 ng/g. Recoveries were 101.1% ± 1.7%-106.1% ± 1.3% in tablet samples and 101.2% ± 2.2%-109.1% ± 3.9% in capsule samples, with coefficients of variation 2.1%-3.1% and 1.8%-3.6%, respectively, consistent with existing LC-MS/MS methods. Therefore, the ICA is suitable for use in slimming tablet and capsule samples.

Lab-in-syringe automated protein precipitation and salting-out homogenous liquid-liquid extraction coupled online to UHPLC-MS/MS for the determination of beta-blockers in serum

A sample preparation method involving tandem implementation of protein precipitation and salting-out homogenous liquid-liquid extraction was developed for the determination of beta-blockers in serum. The entire procedure was automated using a computer-controlled syringe pump following the Lab-In-Syringe approach. It is based on the denaturation of serum proteins with acetonitrile followed by salt-induced phase separation upon which the proteins accumulate as a compact layer at the interphase of the solutions. The extract is then separated and diluted in-syringe before being submitted to online coupled UHPLC-MS/MS. A 1 mL glass syringe containing a small stir bar for solution mixing at up to 3000 rpm, was used to deal with sample volumes as small as 100 μL. A sample throughput of 7 h^-1 was achieved by performing the chromatographic run and sample preparation procedure in parallel. Linear working ranges were obtained for all analytes between 5 and 100 ng mL^-1, with LOD values ranging from 0.4 to 1.5 ng mL^-1. Accuracy values in the range of 88.2-106% and high precision of <11% RSD suggest applicability for routine analysis that can be further improved using deuterated standards.

Closing the gap - development of an analytical methodology using volumetric absorptive microsampling of finger prick blood followed by LC-HRMS/MS for adherence monitoring of antihypertensive drugs

Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), an emerging microsampling technique, is a promising tool for adherence monitoring. This study focused on development of an analytical methodology to improve VAMS-based strategies for adherence assessment by analyzing angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, loop diuretics, a potassium-sparing diuretic, and a thiazide diuretic. Development included sample preparation, chromatographic conditions, mass spectrometry settings, validation, and demonstrating proof of concept. Quantification of analytes, by name furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide, lisinopril, torasemide, and the active metabolites, canrenone, enalaprilat, and ramiprilat in finger prick blood (FPB), was validated based on international guidelines. Selectivity, carryover, and within/between-run accuracy and precision were in accordance with the recommendations. The matrix effect was evaluated at three different hematocrit levels (HT: 20%, 40%, 60%) and the coefficients of variation did not exceed 15%. Dilution integrity (1:10 and 1:20) was given for all analytes except lisinopril, yet for lisinopril, the therapeutic range was already covered by the calibration range. Long-term stability in VAMS tips was tested for 2 weeks at 24 °C in the dark and revealed no degradation of analytes. The proof of concept was performed by analyzing 35 intakes of ACE-inhibitors and diuretics in 18 VAMS and matched plasma samples. Hereby, determined concentration in FPB and plasma cannot be used interchangeably, and thus specific reference ranges for whole blood must be established. Nevertheless, the VAMS-based strategy was shown to be suitable for assessing adherence of all classes of antihypertensive drugs used in the guidelines to manage hypertension.

A whole blood microsampling furosemide assay: development, validation and use in a pediatric pharmacokinetic study

Background: Furosemide is a commonly used diuretic for the treatment of edema. The pharmacokinetics of furosemide in neonates as they mature remains poorly understood. Microsampling assays facilitate research in pediatric populations. Results: We developed and validated a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantitation of furosemide in human whole blood with volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) devices (10 μl). Furosemide was stable in human whole blood VAMS under the study's assay conditions. This work established stability for furosemide for 161 days when stored as dried microsamples at -78°C. Conclusion: This method is being applied for the quantitation of furosemide in whole blood VAMS in an ongoing prospective pediatric clinical study. Representative clinical data are reported.

Dose-Related Reference Range as a Tool in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) aims to individualize drug therapy. This systematic review provides a state-of-the-art overview of the benefits of adding the dose-related reference range (DRR) as a second reference range to the set of tools used by TDM for measurement and evaluation. It discusses alternative pharmacokinetic approaches for individualization of drug therapy.

METHODS

Literature was searched in PubMed. Textbooks provided Bateman transformations for calculating expected drug concentrations at various times after drug application in "normal patients," that is, the population of phase II clinical trials. The review compiles conditions and prerequisites for these transformations to be valid.

RESULTS

Relating a measured drug concentration to the orienting therapeutic reference range provides pharmacodynamic information for improving the benefit-to-risk ratio of desired drug effects versus adverse drug effects. The discriminating DRR considers a patient's individual pharmacokinetic situation. DRR is statistically based on the pharmacokinetic parameters total clearance, time to reach maximal concentrations, and elimination half-life. Relating the measured drug concentration to a range rather than a particular value, DRR determines if individual patients do or do not belong to the population of "normal patients." Once a patient is identified to be outside the population of "normal patients," the clinical-pharmacological TDM report elaborates the cause. It consists of the measured value, the TDM 9-field-board, the elimination pathways table, and a medication recommendation taking into account clinical information. The internet-based platform KONBEST supports editing of the clinical-pharmacological TDM report. It is personally signed and send to the therapist.

CONCLUSIONS

The DRR embedded into a clinical-pharmacological TDM report allows adjusting a patient's medication to the patient's individual needs (individualization of drug therapy).

Development, validation, and implementation of an UHPLC-MS/MS method for the quantitation of furosemide in infant urine samples

Furosemide is a diuretic drug used to increase urine flow in order to reduce the amount of salt and water in the body. It is commonly utilized to treat preterm infants with chronic lung disease of prematurity. There is a need for a simple and reliable quantitation of furosemide in human urine. We have developed and validated an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for furosemide quantitation in human urine with an assay range of 0.100-50.0 μg/ml. Sample preparation involved solid-phase extraction with 10 μl of urine. Intra-day accuracies and precisions for the quality control samples were 94.5-106 and 1.86-10.2%, respectively, while inter-day accuracies and precision were 99.2-102 and 3.38-7.41%, respectively. Recovery for furosemide had an average of 23.8%, with an average matrix effect of 101%. Furosemide was stable in human urine under the assay conditions. Stability for furosemide was shown at 1 week (room temperature, 4, -20 and -78°C), 6 months (-78°C), and through three freeze-thaw cycles. This robust assay demonstrates accurate and precise quantitation of furosemide in a small volume (10 μl) of human urine. It is currently being implemented in an ongoing pediatric clinical study.

Nonadherence in Hypertension: How to Develop and Implement Chemical Adherence Testing

Nonadherence to antihypertensive medication is common, especially in those with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (true treatment-resistant hypertension requires exclusion of nonadherence), and its routine detection is supported by clinical guidelines. Chemical adherence testing is a reliable and valid method to detect adherence, yet methods are unstandardized and are not ubiquitous. This article describes the principles of chemical adherence testing for hypertensive patients and provides a set of recommendations for centers wishing to develop the test. We recommend testing should be done in either of two instances: (1) in those who have resistant hypertension or (2) in those on 2 antihypertensives who have a less than 10 mm Hg drop in systolic blood pressure on addition of the second antihypertensive medication. Furthermore, we recommend that verbal consent is secured before undertaking the test, and the results should be discussed with the patient. Based on medications prescribed in United Kingdom, European Union, and United States, we list top 20 to 24 drugs that cover >95% of hypertension prescriptions which may be included in the testing panel. Information required to identify these medications on mass spectrometry platforms is likewise provided. We discuss issues related to ethics, sample collection, transport, stability, urine versus blood samples, qualitative versus quantitative testing, pharmacokinetics, instrumentation, validation, quality assurance, and gaps in knowledge. We consider how to best present, interpret, and discuss chemical adherence test results with the patient. In summary, this guidance should help clinicians and their laboratories in the development of chemical adherence testing of prescribed antihypertensive drugs.

Evaluation and analytical applicability of a novel volumetric absorptive microsampling strategy for adherence monitoring of antihypertensive drugs by means of LC-HRMS/MS

Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), an emerging microsampling technique, is expected to overcome some disadvantages of dried blood spots. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a VAMS-based strategy for quantifying ten frequently prescribed antihypertensive drugs (AHD) (amlodipine, bisoprolol, candesartan, carvedilol, lercanidipine, losartan carboxylic acid, metoprolol, nebivolol, telmisartan, valsartan) in finger prick blood (FPB) within the scope of adherence monitoring. The straightforward workflow consisted of VAMS tip hydration and subsequent precipitation. Samples were analyzed by using reversed phase ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to orbitrap mass spectrometry operating in parallel reaction monitoring mode. The analytical procedure was successfully validated based on international recommendations for most of the analytes. Selectivity and within/between-run accuracy and precision were in accordance with the recommendations. Internal standard normalized matrix factor met recommended criteria for all analytes at HT 20%, 40%, and 60% except for amlodipine were the CV exceeded 15% at HT 20% (CV 18%). Dilution integrity was given for all substances, covering the quantification in the upper part of the therapeutic range of selected AHD. Long-term stability in VAMS tips was tested and revealed degradation of lercanidipine after one week of storage at 24 °C. A proof of concept of the analytical applicability was done by quantification of selected AHD in VAMS tips and matched plasma samples. Results revealed that determined concentration in FPB by VAMS and plasma cannot be used interchangeably, and thus that specific reference ranges have to be established. However, a novel VAMS application was implemented in the context of adherence monitoring for at least the investigated AHD.

Assessing Adherence to Antihypertensive Medication by Means of Dose-Dependent Reference Plasma Concentration Ranges and Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Poor adherence to antihypertensive drug therapy is a well-recognized problem and can be assessed by mass spectrometry-based analyses of body fluids. However, contrary statements exist whether drug quantification in blood or qualitative screening in urine is more suitable. The present pilot study aimed to further elucidate the power of blood plasma drug concentrations for adherence monitoring by developing and validating a quantification procedure for nine antihypertensive drugs (amlodipine, bisoprolol, candesartan, canrenone, carvedilol, metoprolol, olmesartan, torasemide, and valsartan) in blood plasma using liquid–liquid extraction and an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry analysis. The procedure should then be used for an adherence assessment and compared with the results of an established qualitative urine screening. Selectivity, carryover, matrix effect, accuracy, precision, dilution integrity, and stability were successfully validated, except for amlodipine. The applicability was demonstrated by analyzing 19 plasma samples containing 28 antihypertensive drugs and comparing the measured concentrations with calculated dose-dependent reference plasma concentration ranges. The interpretation of plasma concentrations was found to be more sophisticated and time-consuming than that of urine screening results, and adherence could not be assessed in two cases (10%) due to measured plasma concentrations below the lower limit of quantification. However, 14 out of 19 subjects were classified as adherent (75%) and three as nonadherent (15%), in contrast to 19 (100%) that were claimed to be adherent based on the results of the qualitative urine screening. Nevertheless, further data is needed to estimate whether plasma quantification is superior in terms of assessing adherence to antihypertensive medication.

Establishing Serum Reference Ranges for Antihypertensive Drugs

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) involves the measurement of serum drug concentrations to optimize pharmacotherapy. Traditionally, blood pressure measurements alone, and not TDM, have been used to evaluate the antihypertensive drug response. However, approximately 50% of hypertensive patients treated with lifestyle changes and antihypertensive drugs fail to achieve blood pressure control. Serum drug concentration measurements could be useful to select the optimal drugs in adjusted doses and to identify nonadherence. Implementation of TDM in clinical routine for antihypertensive drugs depends on established serum reference ranges.

METHODS

Commonly used antihypertensive drugs were identified based on prescription data. The authors performed a review of authoritative literature on reported serum drug concentrations and calculated expected concentrations from previously reported pharmacokinetic parameters with commonly prescribed daily doses. Finally, serum drug concentrations in samples from patients undergoing antihypertensive treatment were measured.

RESULTS

Serum reference ranges for 24 frequently used antihypertensive drugs were established based on results from 3 approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum drug concentration measurements, interpreted in light of the established reference ranges, together with blood pressure measurements and other clinical data, may help identify nonadherent patients and tailor individual antihypertensive treatment when deviant drug responses appear in line with the concept of personalized medicine.

Plasma Trough Concentrations of Antihypertensive Drugs for the Assessment of Treatment Adherence: A Meta-Analysis

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Biochemical drug screening by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in plasma is an accurate method for the quantification of plasma concentrations of antihypertensive medications in patients with hypertension. Trough concentrations could possibly be used as drug-specific cutoff values in the biochemical assessment of (non-)adherence. We performed a literature review and meta-analysis of pharmacokinetic studies to determine plasma trough concentrations of amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, and valsartan. PubMed was searched for pharmacokinetic studies up to September 2020. Eligible studies reported steady-state mean trough concentration and their variance. Pooled trough concentrations were estimated using a three-level random effects meta-analytic model. Moderator analyses were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity. One thousand three hundred eighteen potentially relevant articles were identified of which 45 were eligible for inclusion. The pooled mean trough concentration was 9.2 ng/mL (95% CI, 7.5–10.8) for amlodipine, 41.0 ng/mL (95% CI, 17.4–64.7) for hydrochlorothiazide, and 352.9 ng/mL (95% CI, 243.5–462.3) for valsartan. Substantial heterogeneity was present for all 3 pooled estimates. Moderator analyses identified dosage as a significant moderator for the pooled trough concentration of amlodipine (β₁=0.9; P<0.05), mean age, and mean body weight for the mean trough concentration of hydrochlorothiazide (β₁=2.2, P<0.05, respectively, β₁=−4.0, P<0.05) and no significant moderators for valsartan. Plasma trough concentrations of amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, and valsartan, measured with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, are highly heterogeneous over the different studies. Use of the pooled trough concentration as a cutoff in the biochemical assessment of adherence can result in inaccurate diagnosis of (non-)adherence, which may seriously harm the patient-physician relationship, and is therefore not recommended.

Metoprolol Impairs β1-Adrenergic Receptor-Mediated Vasodilation in Rat Cerebral Arteries: Implications for β-Blocker Therapy

The practice of prescribing β-blockers to lower blood pressure and mitigate perioperative cardiovascular events has been questioned because of reports of an increased risk of stroke. The benefit of β-blocker therapy primarily relies on preventing activation of cardiac β1-adrenergic receptors (ARs). However, we reported that β1ARs also mediate vasodilator responses of rat cerebral arteries (CAs), implying that β-blockers may impair cerebral blood flow under some conditions. Here, we defined the impact of metoprolol (MET), a widely prescribed β1AR-selective antagonist, on adrenergic-elicited diameter responses of rat CAs ex vivo and in vivo. MET (1-10 µmol/l) prevented β1AR-mediated increases in diameter elicited by dobutamine in cannulated rat CAs. The β1AR-mediated dilation elicited by the endogenous adrenergic agonist norepinephrine (NE) was reversed to a sustained constriction by MET. Acute oral administration of MET (30 mg/kg) to rats in doses that attenuated resting heart rate and dobutamine-induced tachycardia also blunted β1AR-mediated dilation of CAs. In the same animals, NE-induced dilation of CAs was reversed to sustained constriction. Administration of MET for 2 weeks in drinking water (2 mg/ml) or subcutaneously (15 mg/kg per day) also resulted in NE-induced constriction of CAs in vivo. Thus, doses of MET that protect the heart from adrenergic stimulation also prevent β1AR-mediated dilation of CAs and favor anomalous adrenergic constriction. Our findings raise the possibility that the increased risk of ischemic stroke in patients on β-blockers relates in part to adrenergic dysregulation of cerebrovascular tone. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: β-Blocker therapy using second-generation, cardioselective β-blockers is associated with an increased risk of stroke, but the responsible mechanisms are unclear. Here, we report that either acute or chronic systemic administration of a cardioselective β-blocker, metoprolol, mitigates adrenergic stimulation of the heart as an intended beneficial action. However, metoprolol concomitantly eliminates vasodilator responses to adrenergic stimuli of rat cerebral arteries in vivo as a potential cause of dysregulated cerebral blood flow predisposing to ischemic stroke.

Benefit of serum drug monitoring complementing urine analysis to assess adherence to antihypertensive drugs in first-line therapy

With obesity having doubled in the last decade, hypertension is on the rise. In one-third of hypertensive patients the metabolic syndrome is present. This might be one factor for the increasing number of prescriptions for angiotensin receptor blockers and calcium-channel blockers besides a more favorable risk-to-benefit ratio. The aim of the present study was to evaluate a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) method for assessment of adherence based on cut-offs in inpatients and to compare it to an established urine drug screening in outpatients. A method for quantification of calcium-channel blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric analysis (LC-MS/MS) was developed and validated. The method was applied to serum samples of 32 patients under supervised medication to establish cut-off values for adherence assessment based on dose-related concentrations (DRC, calculated from pharmacokinetic data). Furthermore, corresponding urine and blood samples of 42 outpatients without supervised medication were analysed and the results compared with regard to adherence assessment. All serum concentrations measured for amlodipine (n = 40), lercanidipine (n = 14), candesartan (n = 10), telmisartan (n = 4) and valsartan (n = 10) in inpatients were above the patient specific lower DRC confirming adherence. Of 42 outpatients the identification of analytes in urine as well as the quantification in serum exhibited differing results. According to urinalysis, adherence was demonstrated in only 87.0% of prescriptions, compared to 91.3% for serum analyses. Differences were observed for amlodipine, lercanidipine and candesartan which can be explained by a higher specificity of the serum analysis approach due to pharmacokinetics. The present study confirms that assessing adherence based on serum drug concentrations with individually calculated lower DRCs is more accurate than using qualitative urine analysis. In particular, drugs with low bioavailability, low renal excretion or high metabolism rate such as lercanidipine and candesartan may lead to underestimation of adherence via urine analysis.

Assessment of adherence to diuretics and β-blockers by serum drug monitoring in comparison to urine analysis

Purpose: Toxicological screenings for identifying antihypertensive drugs proved to be a useful tool for assessing adherence. However, misinterpretation may occur in case of highly metabolised drugs with low renal excretion, as well as for drugs with a prolonged detectability. The aim of the present study was to compare a recently developed therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) method based on serum concentrations to an urine drug detection method for assessing adherence in outpatients.Materials and methods: Corresponding urine and blood samples were obtained at the same time from 26 outpatients without supervised medication. Urine and serum analyses were performed using established high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methodologies. Adherence was assumed if drugs were detectable in urine or if serum concentrations were above individually calculated lower dose-related concentrations (DRC) or literature-based therapeutic reference ranges (TRR) used as cut-off, respectively.Results: The identification of analytes in urine as well as the quantitative serum assay were performed for atenolol (n = 6 patients), bisoprolol (n = 8), nebivolol (n = 6), canrenone (n = 6, metabolite of spironolactone), hydrochlorothiazide (n = 12) and furosemide (n = 2). On the basis of drug detectability in urine, adherence was assumed in 88% of prescriptions. In 81% (DRC) and 50% (TRR) of the serum analyses the cut-off value was exceeded, which confirms patients' adherence in a lower number. Differences in adherence rates were found in five patients, mainly for β-blockers.Conclusion: This study suggests that assessment of adherence can be performed more precisely on the basis of serum drug concentrations with individually calculated lower DRC than by using the TRR or qualitative urinalysis.