The molecular etiology of deafness and auditory performance in the postlingually deafened cochlear implantees

Clinical characteristics and hearing loss etiology of cochlear implantees undergoing surgery in their teens, 20s, and 30s

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the etiology of hearing loss, including genetic variants, in individuals who underwent cochlear implantation (CI) in their teens to thirties. It also sought to analyze post-CI speech performance and identify prognostic factors affecting CI outcomes in this age group.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 421 cochlear implant patients at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, focusing on 63 subjects aged 10-39 years who underwent their first CI by a single surgeon between July 2018 and June 2022. The study included audiologic evaluation, molecular genetic testing, and analysis of speech performance post-CI. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25 and GraphPad Prism 7.

RESULTS

Among 63 participants (M:F, 24:39), nine underwent CI in their teens, 24 in their 20 s, and 30 in their 30 s. Most of them (40, 63.5%) had postlingual deafness. The study found that 65.2% (40/63) of subjects received a genetic diagnosis, with DFNB4 being the most common etiology (37.5%, 15/40). Post-CI speech evaluation showed an average sentence score of 80% across all subjects. Factors such as the onset of hearing loss, duration of deafness (DoD), and preoperative Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) significantly influenced CI outcomes. Notably, longer DoD was associated with poorer CI outcomes, but this did not affect individuals with postlingual hearing loss as much.

CONCLUSION

The study concludes that in individuals aged 10-39 undergoing CI, the onset of hearing loss and preoperative SIR are critical predictors of postoperative outcomes. CI is recommended for those with postlingual hearing loss in this age group, irrespective of the DoD. The study highlights the importance of genetic factors especially DFNB4 in hearing loss etiology and underscores the value of the relatively easy-to-evaluate factor, preoperative SIR in predicting CI outcomes.

Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Patients With TMTC2 -Associated Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Auditory Neuropathy/Auditory Dys-Synchrony

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with TMTC2 -associated sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy/auditory dys-synchrony.

PATIENTS

Adult and pediatric cochlear implant (CI) patients followed in an academic center who tested positive for TMTC2 genetic variant rs35725509.

INTERVENTION

Cochlear implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Speech perception scores in quiet.

RESULTS

Ten CI patients were identified with TMTC2 variant rs35725509 out of 157 patients who underwent genetic testing (i.e., 6.3% of patients tested). All demonstrated progressive, bilateral hearing loss with severe-to-profound audiometric thresholds preoperatively. Pre-CI and 1-year post-CI speech recognition percent correct scores were compared. Post-CI speech perception (mean 61.0%, standard deviation 31.4%) was significantly higher than pre-CI speech perception (mean 21.0%, standard deviation 27.0%) ( p = 0.002). Individually, 9 of the 10 subjects experienced significant improvements in speech perception pre- to post-CI ( p < 0.05). Electrically evoked compound action potential measures were available for five patients, and all showed normal electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds.

CONCLUSION

Patients with TMTC2 -associated sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy/auditory dys-synchrony have significantly improved speech perception outcomes with cochlear implantation and should be considered candidates for this intervention if there are no other contraindications.

Navigating the Usher Syndrome Genetic Landscape: An Evaluation of the Associations between Specific Genes and Quality Categories of Cochlear Implant Outcomes

Usher syndrome (US) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorder that involves three main features: sensorineural hearing loss, retinitis pigmentosa (RP), and vestibular impairment. With a prevalence of 4-17/100,000, it is the most common cause of deaf-blindness worldwide. Genetic research has provided crucial insights into the complexity of US. Among nine confirmed causative genes, MYO7A and USH2A are major players in US types 1 and 2, respectively, whereas CRLN1 is the sole confirmed gene associated with type 3. Variants in these genes also contribute to isolated forms of hearing loss and RP, indicating intersecting molecular pathways. While hearing loss can be adequately managed with hearing aids or cochlear implants (CIs), approved RP treatment modalities are lacking. Gene replacement and editing, antisense oligonucleotides, and small-molecule drugs hold promise for halting RP progression and restoring vision, enhancing patients' quality of life. Massively parallel sequencing has identified gene variants (e.g., in PCDH15) that influence CI results. Accordingly, preoperative genetic examination appears valuable for predicting CI success. To explore genetic mutations in CI recipients and establish correlations between implant outcomes and involved genes, we comprehensively reviewed the literature to gather data covering a broad spectrum of CI outcomes across all known US-causative genes. Implant outcomes were categorized as excellent or very good, good, poor or fair, and very poor. Our review of 95 cochlear-implant patients with US, along with their CI outcomes, revealed the importance of presurgical genetic testing to elucidate potential challenges and provide tailored counseling to improve auditory outcomes. The multifaceted nature of US demands a comprehensive understanding and innovative interventions. Genetic insights drive therapeutic advancements, offering potential remedies for the retinal component of US. The synergy between genetics and therapeutics holds promise for individuals with US and may enhance their sensory experiences through customized interventions.

American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force: Recommendations for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Adults

The indications for cochlear implantation have expanded over time due to evidence demonstrating identification and implantation of appropriate cochlear implant (CI) candidates lead to significant improvements in speech recognition and quality of life (QoL). However, clinical practice is variable, with some providers using outdated criteria and others exceeding current labeled indications. As a results, only a fraction of those persons who could benefit from CI technology receive it. This document summarizes the current evidence for determining appropriate referrals for adults with bilateral hearing loss into CI centers for formal evaluation by stressing the importance of treating each ear individually and a "revised 60/60 rule". By mirroring contemporary clinical practice and available evidence, these recommendations will also provide a standardized testing protocol for CI candidates using a team-based approach that prioritizes individualized patient care. This manuscript was developed by the Adult Cochlear Implantation Candidacy Task Force of the American Cochlear Implant Alliance using review of the existing literature and clinical consensus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 134:S1-S14, 2024.

Structural analysis of pathogenic TMPRSS3 variants and their cochlear implantation outcomes of sensorineural hearing loss

TMPRSS3, a type II transmembrane serine protease, is involved in various biological processes including the development and maintenance of the inner ear. Biallelic variants in TMPRSS3 typically result in altered protease activity, causing autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss (ARNSHL). Structural modeling has been conducted to predict the pathogenicity of TMPRSS3 variants and to gain a better understanding of their prognostic correlation. The mutant-driven changes in TMPRSS3 had substantial impacts on neighboring residues, and the pathogenicity of variants was predicted based on their distance from the active site. However, a more in-depth analysis of other factors, such as intramolecular interactions and protein stability, which affect proteolytic activities is yet to be conducted for TMPRSS3 variants. Among 620 probands who provided genomic DNA for molecular genetic testing, eight families with biallelic TMPRSS3 variants that were segregated in a trans configuration were included. Seven different mutant alleles, either homozygous or compound heterozygous, contributed to TMPRSS3-associated ARNSHL, expanding the genotypic spectrum of disease-causing TMPRSS3 variants. Through three-dimensional modeling and structural analysis, TMPRSS3 variants compromise protein stability by altering intramolecular interactions, and each mutant differently interacts with the serine protease active site. Furthermore, the changes in intramolecular interactions leading to regional instability correlate with the results of functional assay and residual hearing function, but overall stability predictions do not. Our findings also build on previous evidence indicating that most recipients with TMPRSS3 variants have favorable cochlear implantation (CI) outcomes. We found that age at CI was significantly correlated with speech performance outcomes; genotype was not correlated with these outcomes. Collectively, the results of this study contribute to a more structural understanding of the underlying mechanisms of ARNSHL caused by TMPRSS3 variants.

Comprehensive Prediction Model, Including Genetic Testing, for the Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVES

Despite growing interest in the genetic contribution to cochlear implant (CI) outcomes, only a few studies with limited samples have examined the association of CI outcomes with genetic etiologies. We analyzed CI outcomes using known predictors and genetic testing results to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the impact of genetic etiologies.

DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and images of patients who underwent cochlear implantation and genetic testing at a single tertiary medical institution, between May 2008 and December 2020. After excluding those whose speech test results were unavailable, and those in whom the implant was removed due to complications, such as infection or device failure, 203 patients were included in this study. The participants were categorized into adult (≥19 years), child (2-18 years), and infant (<24 months) groups. Outcomes were measured based on categories of auditory perception, monosyllable, disyllable, and sentence scores. For the infant group, the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale score was used.

RESULTS

Among the 203 participants, a causative genetic variant was identified in 117 (57.6%) individuals. The presence of a causative variant was significantly associated with better CI outcomes in the infant group (β = 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.01 to 0.47; p = 0.044), but not in the child and adult groups. In the genetically confirmed patients without cochlear malformation, genetic variants involving the spiral ganglion was a poor prognostic factor in the child group (β = -57.24; 95% confidence interval, -90.63 to -23.75; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of known genetic etiology of hearing loss was associated with better CI outcomes in the infant group, but not in the child and adult groups. A neural-type genetic variant was a poor prognostic factor in the genetically diagnosed child subgroup without cochlear malformation. Careful genetic counseling should be performed before cochlear implantation.

Novel Molecular Genetic Etiology of Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Autosomal-Dominant LMX1A Variants

INTRODUCTION

Sensorineural hearing loss is the most common sensory disorder in humans. Genetic analyses have greatly increased our understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms in play. Thus, characterization of audiologic phenotypes by the genetic etiology may aid elucidation of the etiologies of certain types of inherited hearing loss. Further, delineation of specific audiologic phenotypes based on the genetic etiology aids our understanding of some types of inherited hearing loss in terms of the prediction of clinical course, revelation of genotype-phenotype correlations, and application of appropriate audiologic rehabilitation. Here, we describe the interesting audiologic characteristics of LMX1A -associated deafness, which revealed significant asymmetry between two ears.

METHODS

Among 728 probands of which genomic DNA went through exome sequencing regardless of any specific audiologic phenotypes, probands for which exome sequencing was performed and a causative LMX1A variant was found were all included. Five LMX1A -associated DFNA7 families (approximately 0.7%), the pedigrees of whom indicated autosomal-dominant hearing loss, were identified, and segregation was studied using Sanger sequencing. The affected individuals underwent comprehensive evaluations, including medical history reviews, physical examinations, imaging, and auditory phenotyping. We functionally characterized the novel LMX1A variants via computational structural modeling and luciferase reporter assays.

RESULTS

Among 728 probands of which genomic DNA went through exome sequencing, we identified four novel LMX1A heterozygous variants related to DFNA7 (c.622C>T:p.Arg208*, c.719A>G:p.Gln240Arg, c.721G>A:p.Val241Met, and c.887dup:p.Gln297Thrfs*41) and one harboring a de novo heterozygous missense LMX1A variant (c.595A>G;p.Arg199Gly) previously reported. It is important to note that asymmetric hearing loss was identified in all probands and most affected individuals, although the extent of asymmetry varied. Structural modeling revealed that the two missense variants, p.Gln240Arg and p.Val241Met, affected conserved residues of the homeodomain, thus attenuating LMX1A-DNA interaction. In addition, Arg208*-induced premature termination of translation destroyed the structure of the LMX1A protein, including the DNA-binding homeodomain, and p.Gln297Thrfs*41 led to the loss of the C-terminal helix involved in LIM2 domain interaction. Compared with the wild-type protein, all mutant LMX1A proteins had significantly reduced transactivation efficiency, indicating that the ability to elicit transcription of the downstream target genes of LMX1A was severely compromised. Thus, in line with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guideline specified to genetic hearing loss, the four novel LMX1A variants were identified as "pathogenic" (p.Arg208* and p.Gln297Thrfs*41), "likely pathogenic" (p.Val241Met), and as a "variant of uncertain significance'' (p.Gln240Arg).

CONCLUSION

For the first time, we suggest that LMX1A is one of the candidate genes which, if altered, could be associated with dominantly inherited asymmetric hearing loss. We also expand the genotypic spectrum of disease-causing variants of LMX1A causing DFNA7 by doubling the number of LMX1A variants reported thus far in the literature.

Precision Medicine Approach to Cochlear Implantation

In the early days of cochlear implantation (CI) surgery, when the types of electrodes were limited and the etiology of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was not well understood, the one-size-fits-all approach to CI held true, as in all other fields. However, in the era of personalized medicine, there have been attempts to associate CI performance with the etiology of SNHL and to establish customized surgical techniques that can maximize performance according to individual cochlear dimensions. Personalized genomic-driven assessments of CI candidates and a better understanding of genotype-phenotype correlations could provide clinically applicable diagnostic and prognostic information about questions such as who, how, and when to implant. Rigorous and strategic imaging assessments also provide better insights into the anatomic etiology of SNHL and cochlear dimensions, leading to individualized surgical techniques to augment CI outcomes. Furthermore, the precision medicine approach to CI is not necessarily limited to preoperative planning, but can be extended to either intraoperative electrode positioning or even the timing of the initial switch-on. In this review, we discuss the implications of personalized diagnoses (both genetic and nongenetic) on the planning and performance of CI in patients with prelingual and postlingual SNHL.

Effects of CoQ10 Replacement Therapy on the Audiological Characteristics of Pediatric Patients with COQ6 Variants

Primary coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) deficiency refers to a group of mitochondrial cytopathies caused by genetic defects in CoQ10 biosynthesis. Primary coenzyme Q10 deficiency-6 (COQ10D6) is an autosomal recessive disorder attributable to biallelic COQ6 variants; the cardinal phenotypes are steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS), which inevitably progresses to kidney failure, and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Here, we describe the phenotypes and genotypes of 12 children with COQ10D6 from 11 unrelated Korean families and quantitatively explore the beneficial effects of CoQ10 replacement therapy on SNHL. A diagnosis of SRNS generally precedes SNHL documentation. COQ10D6 is associated with progressive SNHL. Four causative COQ6 variants were identified in either homozygotes or compound heterozygotes: c.189_191delGAA, c.484C>T, c.686A>C, and c.782C>T. The response rate (no further hearing loss or improvement) was 42.9%; CoQ10 replacement therapy may thus limit and even improve hearing loss. Notably, the audiological benefit appeared to be genotype-specific, suggesting a genotype–phenotype correlation. The results of cochlear implantation were generally favorable, and the effects were sustained over time. Our results thus propose the beneficial effects of CoQ10 replacement therapy on hearing loss. Our work with COQ10D6 patients is a good example of personalized, genetically tailored, audiological rehabilitation of patients with syndromic deafness.

Neural Adaptation of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Is Not Affected by Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened, Middle-aged, and Elderly Adult Cochlear Implant Users

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the associations between advanced age and the amount and the speed of neural adaptation of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve (AN) in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant (CI) users.

DESIGN

Study participants included 26 postlingually deafened adult CI users, ranging in age between 28.7 and 84.0 years (mean: 63.8 years, SD: 14.4 years) at the time of testing. All study participants used a Cochlear Nucleus device with a full electrode array insertion in the test ear. The stimulus was a 100-ms pulse train with a pulse rate of 500, 900, 1800, or 2400 pulses per second (pps) per channel. The stimulus was presented at the maximum comfortable level measured at 2400 pps with a presentation rate of 2 Hz. Neural adaptation of the AN was evaluated using electrophysiological measures of the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP). The amount of neural adaptation was quantified by the adaptation index (AI) within three time windows: around 0 to 8 ms (window 1), 44 to 50 ms (window 2), and 94 to 100 ms (window 3). The speed of neural adaptation was quantified using a two-parameter power law estimation. In 23 participants, four electrodes across the electrode array were tested. In three participants, three electrodes were tested. Results measured at different electrode locations were averaged for each participant at each pulse rate to get an overall representation of neural adaptation properties of the AN across the cochlea. Linear-mixed models (LMMs) were used (1) to evaluate the effects of age at testing and pulse rate on the speed of neural adaptation and (2) to assess the effects of age at testing, pulse rate, and duration of stimulation (i.e., time window) on the amount of neural adaptation in these participants.

RESULTS

There was substantial variability in both the amount and the speed of neural adaptation of the AN among study participants. The amount and the speed of neural adaptation increased at higher pulse rates. In addition, larger amounts of adaptation were observed for longer durations of stimulation. There was no significant effect of age on the speed or the amount of neural adaptation.

CONCLUSIONS

The amount and the speed of neural adaptation of the AN are affected by both the pulse rate and the duration of stimulation, with higher pulse rates and longer durations of stimulation leading to faster and greater neural adaptation. Advanced age does not affect neural adaptation of the AN in postlingually deafened, middle-aged and elderly adult CI users.

Genetic Causes of Hearing Loss in a Large Cohort of Cochlear Implant Recipients

Understanding genetic causes of hearing loss can determine the pattern and course of a patient's hearing loss and may also predict outcomes after cochlear implantation. Our goal in this study was to evaluate genetic causes of hearing loss in a large cohort of adults and children with cochlear implants. We performed comprehensive genetic testing on all patients undergoing cochlear implantation. Of the 459 patients included in the study, 128 (28%) had positive genetic testing. In total, 44 genes were identified as causative. The top 5 genes implicated were GJB2 (20, 16%), TMPRSS3 (13, 10%), SLC26A4 (10, 8%), MYO7A (9, 7%), and MT-RNR1 (7, 5%). Pediatric patients had a higher diagnostic rate. This study lays the groundwork for future studies evaluating the relationship between genetic variation and cochlear implant performance.

Central auditory maturation and behavioral outcomes after cochlear implantation in prelingual auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder related to OTOF variants (DFNB9): Lessons from pilot study

The cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP)-based P1 component acts as a biomarker for cochlear implantation (CI) outcomes in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). To date, early intervention primarily before the age of two years and six months of CI usage is necessary and sufficient to achieve age-appropriate cortical maturation and good prognosis. However, varying degrees of neural dyssynchrony, resulting from the etiological heterogeneity of ANSD, may preclude uniform application of this hypothesis to ensure auditory cortical maturation. Thus, a focused evaluation of those carrying OTOF variants, which may be the salient molecular etiology of prelingual ANSD, would circumvent the issue of heterogeneity. Here, we sought to provide a much better understanding of the brain perspectives (i.e., P1 maturation) in OTOF-associated ANSD subjects and set the stage for an optimal strategy to enhance language development. We conducted a preliminary study comprising 10 subjects diagnosed with OTOF-related ANSD who underwent CI by a single surgeon and subsequently underwent measurements of the P1 component. We observed that DFNB9 subjects who received CI after 2 years of age exhibited “absent” or “anomalous” P1 components that correspond to delayed language development. However, timely implantation, as early as 12 months of age per se, might be insufficient to achieve age-appropriate cortical maturation of DFNB9 in cases with six to seven months of device use. This suggests the importance of sustained rehabilitation in DFNB9 than in other etiologies. Indeed, an additional follow-up study showed that a reduction in P1 latency was linked to an improvement in auditory performance. Collectively, our results suggest that central auditory maturation and successful outcome of CI in DFNB9 may have more demanding requirements, that is, earlier implantation and more sustained rehabilitation. We believe that the current study opens a new path toward genome-based neuroimaging in the field of hearing research.

Outcome of Cochlear Implantation in NLRP3-related Autoinflammatory Inner Ear Disorders

OBJECTIVE

Hearing loss is a highly penetrant phenotype in NLRP3 (Nod-Like-Receptor-Pyrin containing 3) gene-related autoinflammatory disorders. A recent study revealed potential medical treatment of hearing loss with anakinra (anti-interleukin 1 receptor antagonist) in selected cases. However, for severely aggravated hearing loss not responsive to anakinra, cochlear implantation (CI) would be the last resort for hearing rehabilitation. Outcome of CI is not clearly elucidated yet in this emerging type of hearing loss related to NLRP3-related autoinflammatory disorders, which has a systemic nature and ubiquitous distribution of resident macrophages involving the spiral ganglion neuron and the cochlear nerve. Here, we report the successful outcome of CI in NLRP3-related autoinflammatory disorder.

PATIENTS

Three subjects representing each type of NLRP3-related autoinflammatory disorder: chronic infantile, neurological, cutaneous, and articular syndrome; Muckle-Wells syndrome; and DFNA34, who underwent CI for auditory rehabilitation, were recruited.

INTERVENTIONS

Phenotypes as well as genotypes were reviewed in the subjects.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Audiologic performances before/after CI over time were evaluated.

RESULTS

All three subjects showed excellent audiological outcomes with rapid improvement of speech perception test result reaching plateau at 3 months after CI, although distribution of the disease predicted poor outcome based on theoretical analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report to present outcome of CI among subjects with a confirmed NLRP3 genetic etiology and resultant systemic inflammation, and suggests that CI is a viable treatment option in this disease entity.

Auditory Outcome after Cochlear Implantation in Children with DFNB7/11 Caused by Pathogenic Variants in TMC1 Gene

INTRODUCTION

Non-syndromic hereditary hearing loss is characterized by extreme genetic heterogeneity. So far, more than 100 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in TMC1 gene have been reported in patients with autosomal recessive hearing loss (HL) DFNB7/11. The prevailing auditory phenotype of individuals with DFNB7/11 is congenital, profound, bilateral HL, but the functional outcome after cochlear implantation (CI) described in the literature is variable. The objective of this work is to evaluate the auditory outcome after CI in pediatric patients with DFNB7/11, born to non-consanguineous parents.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of genetic and audiological data of DFNB7/11 patients followed up in a single Italian otolaryngology clinic was performed. Cases with biallelic pathogenic variants in TMC1 were selected from the cohort of children with non-syndromic hearing loss who had undergone CI and had been molecularly characterized by multigene panel testing. All patients underwent extensive audiological assessment, and the auditory outcome after CI was evaluated.

RESULTS

DFNB7/11 was diagnosed in a total of 3 patients from 2 non-consanguineous families; a novel disease-causing variant in TMC1 was detected [c.962G>A p.(Trp321*)]. All the affected children showed the typical DFNB7/11 phenotype characterized by prelingual, severe-to-profound HL. The patients showed an excellent functional outcome after CI; speech perception, nonverbal cognition, and speech performance were comparable to those of patients with DFNB1 deafness.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Our results do not support the variable auditory outcome reported in the literature, which may be affected by several social and environmental factors and by the genetic background.

Flexible Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Platforms for Detecting Deafness Mutations in Koreans: A Proposed Guideline for the Etiologic Diagnosis of Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder

Routine application of next-generation sequencing in clinical settings is often limited by time- and cost-prohibitive complex filtering steps. Despite the previously introduced genotyping kit that allows screening of the 11 major recurring variants of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) genes in the Korean population, the demand for phenotype- and variant-specific screening kits still remains. Herein, we developed a new real-time PCR-based kit (U-TOP™ HL Genotyping Kit Ver2), comprising six variants from two auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) genes (OTOF and ATP1A3) and five variants from three SNHL genes (MPZL2, COCH, and TMC1), with a distinct auditory phenotype, making this the first genotyping kit dedicated to ANSD. The concordance rate with Sanger sequencing, sensitivity, and specificity of this genotyping kit were all 100%, suggesting reliability. The kit not only allows timely and cost-effective identification of recurring OTOF variants, but it also allows timely detection of cochlear nerve deficiency for those without OTOF variants. Herein, we provide a clinical guideline for an efficient, rapid, and cost-effective etiologic diagnosis of prelingual ANSD. Our study provides a good example of continuing to update new key genetic variants, which will continuously be revealed through NGS, as targets for the newly developed genotyping kit.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlation for Predicting Cochlear Implant Outcome: Current Challenges and Opportunities

The use and utility of cochlear implantation has rapidly increased in recent years as technological advances in the field have expanded both the efficacy and eligible patient population for implantation. This review aims to serve as a general overview of the most common hearing disorders that have favorable auditory outcomes with cochlear implants (CI). Hearing loss in children caused by congenital cytomegalovirus infection, syndromic conditions including Pendred Syndrome, and non-syndromic genetic conditions such as hearing impairment associated with GJB2 mutations have shown to be successfully managed by CI. Furthermore, cochlear implantation provides the auditory rehabilitation for the most common etiology of hearing loss in adults and age-related hearing loss (ARHL) or presbycusis. However, in some cases, cochlear implantation have been associated with some challenges. Regarding implantation in children, studies have shown that sometimes parents seem to have unrealistic expectations regarding the ability of CI to provide auditory rehabilitation and speech improvement. Given the evidence revealing the beneficial effects of early intervention via CI in individuals with hearing disorders especially hearing loss due to genetic etiology, early auditory and genetic screening efforts may yield better clinical outcomes. There is a need to better understand genotype-phenotype correlations and CI outcome, so that effective genetic counseling and successful treatment strategies can be developed at the appropriate time for hearing impaired individuals.