Association between survival and levetiracetam use in glioblastoma patients treated with temozolomide chemoradiotherapy

Neuronal Activity Promotes Glioma Progression by Inducing Proneural-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Glioma Stem Cells

Neuronal activity can drive progression of high-grade glioma by mediating mitogen production and neuron-glioma synaptic communications. Glioma stem cells (GSC) also play a significant role in progression, therapy resistance, and recurrence in glioma, which implicates potential cross-talk between neuronal activity and GSC biology. Here, we manipulated neuronal activity using chemogenetics in vitro and in vivo to study how it influences GSCs. Neuronal activity supported glioblastoma (GBM) progression and radioresistance through exosome-induced proneural-to-mesenchymal transition (PMT) of GSCs. Molecularly, neuronal activation led to elevated miR-184-3p in neuron-derived exosomes that were taken up by GSCs and reduced the mRNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) levels by inhibiting RBM15 expression. RBM15 deficiency decreased m6A modification of DLG3 mRNA and subsequently induced GSC PMT by activating the STAT3 pathway. Loss of miR-184-3p in cortical neurons reduced GSC xenograft growth, even when neurons were activated. Levetiracetam, an antiepileptic drug, reduced the neuronal production of miR-184-3p-enriched exosomes, inhibited GSC PMT, and increased radiosensitivity of tumors to prolong survival in xenograft mouse models. Together, these findings indicate that exosomes derived from active neurons promote GBM progression and radioresistance by inducing PMT of GSCs.

SIGNIFICANCE

Active neurons secrete exosomes enriched with miR-184-3p that promote glioblastoma progression and radioresistance by driving the proneural-to-mesenchymal transition in glioma stem cells, which can be reversed by antiseizure medication levetiracetam.

Effects of Levetiracetam and Lacosamide on survival and seizure control in IDH-wild type glioblastoma during temozolomide plus radiation adjuvant therapy

Introduction

There are no clear indications for the best choice of anti-seizure medications to control brain tumor related epilepsy. In vitro studies have shown an antitumoral effect of Levetiracetam and Lacosamide on glioblastoma IDH-wild type.

Research question

This study investigates whether the use of levetiracetam and/or lacosamide impacts survival rates. The secondary aim was to evaluate the efficacy of both ASMs in controlling seizures.

Materials and methods

In this observational retrospective single-cohort study, patients underwent chemoradiation protocol after GBM surgery. They were grouped as follows: (1) use of levetiracetam, (2) use of lacosamide, (3) simultaneous use of levetiracetam and lacosamide, (4) no ASM usage. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method coupled with a log-rank test for difference assesments. To evaluate the pharmacological efficacy of post-operative seizure control, a negative binomial regression was conducted.

Results

The study included 272 patients, 174 of which underwent adjuvant chemoradiation treatment. Patients without ASM therapy had a non-significant longer median OS (compared to the other groups (log-rank = 0.37). The IRR of seizure relapse was 2.57 (p = 0.007) times higher in lacosamide users, and MGMT promoter methylation demonstrated a protective effect against postoperative seizure onset (p = 0.05), regardless of the aforementioned confounding factors.

Discussion and conclusions

In patients diagnosed with GBM IDH-WT undergoing chemoradiation therapy, the use of levetiracetam or lacosamide for controlling BTRE does not seem to modify survival. Lacosamide users exhibited a higher IRR of postoperative seizures compared to levetiracetam users, and MGMT promoter methylation appears to be a protective factor.

The role of neurotransmitters in glioblastoma multiforme-associated seizures

GBM, or glioblastoma multiforme, is a brain tumor that poses a great threat to both children and adults, being the primary cause of death related to brain tumors. GBM is often associated with epilepsy, which can be debilitating. Seizures and the development of epilepsy are the primary symptoms that have a severe impact on the quality of life for GBM patients. It is increasingly apparent that the nervous system plays an essential role in the tumor microenvironment for all cancer types, including GBM. In recent years, there has been a growing understanding of how neurotransmitters control the progression of gliomas. Evidence suggests that neurotransmitters and neuromodulators found in the tumor microenvironment play crucial roles in the excitability, proliferation, quiescence, and differentiation of neurons, glial cells, and neural stem cells. The involvement of neurotransmitters appears to play a significant role in various stages of GBM. In this review, the focus is on presenting updated knowledge and emerging ideas regarding the interplay between neurotransmitters and neuromodulators, such as glutamate, GABA, norepinephrine, dopamine, serotonin, adenosine, and their relationship with GBM and the seizures induced by this condition. The review aims to explore the current understanding and provide new insights into the complex interactions between these neurotransmitters and neuromodulators in the context of GBM-related seizures.

Unexpected Transient Glioblastoma Regression in a Patient Previously Treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Therapy: A Case Report and Immunomodulatory Effects Hypothesis

(1) Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), a live attenuated strain of Mycobacterium bovis, has been used as an immunotherapeutic agent in bladder cancer and has shown non-specific beneficial effects. This report presents a unique case of GBM regression following BCG therapy for bladder cancer, suggesting the potential systemic immunomodulatory effects of BCG on GBM. (2) Case Presentation: A 67-year-old male with a history of bladder cancer treated with BCG presented with neurological symptoms. Imaging revealed two GBM lesions, and surgery was performed to remove one. Subsequently, the patient experienced complete tumor regression after initial stability. (3) Conclusions: This case highlights the potential of BCG or other immunotherapies in GBM treatment and underscores the need for further research. Understanding the immunomodulatory effects of BCG on GBM could lead to innovative therapies for this devastating disease; although, overcoming the immune evasion mechanisms in the brain is a significant challenge. Further investigation is warranted to explore this promising avenue of research.

Association of CDKN2A alterations with increased postoperative seizure risk after resection of brain metastases

OBJECTIVE

Seizures are common and significantly disabling for patients with brain metastases (BMs). Although resection can provide seizure control, a subset of patients with BMs may continue to suffer seizures postoperatively. Genomic BM characteristics may influence which patients are at risk for postoperative seizures. This work explores correlations between genomic alterations and risk of postoperative seizures following BM resection.

METHODS

All patients underwent BM resection at a single institution, with available clinical and sequencing data on more than 500 oncogenes. Clinical seizures were documented pre- and postoperatively. A random forest machine learning classification was used to determine candidate genomic alterations associated with postoperative seizures, and clinical and top genomic variables were correlated with postoperative seizures by using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

There were 112 patients with BMs who underwent 114 surgeries and had at least 1 month of postoperative follow-up. Seizures occurred preoperatively in 26 (22.8%) patients and postoperatively in 25 (21.9%). The Engel classification achieved at 6 months for those with preoperative seizures was class I in 13 (50%); class II in 6 (23.1%); class III in 5 (19.2%), and class IV in 2 (7.7%). In those with postoperative seizures, only 8 (32.0%) had seizures preoperatively, and preoperative seizures were not a significant predictor of postoperative seizures (HR 1.84; 95% CI 0.79-4.37; p = 0.156). On random forest classification and multivariate Cox analysis controlling for factors including recurrence, extent of resection, and number of BMs, CDKN2A alterations were associated with postoperative seizures (HR 3.22; 95% CI 1.27-8.16; p = 0.014). Melanoma BMs were associated with higher risk of postoperative seizures compared with all other primary malignancies (HR 5.23; 95% CI 1.37-19.98; p = 0.016). Of 39 BMs with CDKN2A alteration, 35.9% (14/39) had postoperative seizures, compared to 14.7% (11/75) without CDKN2A alteration. The overall rate of postoperative seizures in melanoma BMs was 42.9% (15/35), compared with 12.7% (10/79) for all other primary malignancies.

CONCLUSIONS

CDKN2A alterations and melanoma primary malignancy are associated with increased postoperative seizure risk following resection of BMs. These results may help guide postoperative seizure prophylaxis in patients undergoing resection of BMs.

Epilepsy and brain tumors: Two sides of the same coin

Epilepsy is the most common symptom in patients with brain tumors. The shared genetic, molecular, and cellular mechanisms between tumorigenesis and epileptogenesis represent 'two sides of the same coin'. These include augmented neuronal excitatory transmission, impaired inhibitory transmission, genetic mutations in the BRAF, IDH, and PIK3CA genes, inflammation, hemodynamic impairments, and astrocyte dysfunction, which are still largely unknown. Low-grade developmental brain tumors are those most commonly associated with epilepsy. Given this strict relationship, drugs able to target both seizures and tumors would be of extreme clinical usefulness. In this regard, anti-seizure medications (ASMs) are optimal candidates as they have well-characterized effects and safety profiles, do not increase the risk of developing cancer, and already offer well-defined seizure control. The most important ASMs showing preclinical and clinical efficacy are brivaracetam, lacosamide, perampanel, and especially valproic acid and levetiracetam. However, the data quality is low or limited to preclinical studies, and results are sometimes conflicting. Future trials with a prospective, randomized, and controlled design accounting for different prognostic factors will help clarify the role of these ASMs and the clinical setting in which they might be used. In conclusion, brain tumor-related epilepsies are clear examples of how close, multidisciplinary collaborations among investigators with different expertise are warranted for pursuing scientific knowledge and, more importantly, for the well-being of patients needing targeted and effective therapies.

Effect of Extent of Resection on Survival of Patients with Glioblastoma, IDH-Wild-Type, WHO Grade 4 (WHO 2021): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

In light of the recently updated World Health Organization (WHO) 2021 central nervous system tumor classifications, the aim of the present study was to establish the effect of the resection extent on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients who met the current diagnostic criteria for glioblastoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wild-type (WT), WHO grade 4.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify studies that had compared OS and PFS after gross total resection (GTR) versus subtotal resection (STR) or biopsy for glioblastoma IDH-WT.

RESULTS

We identified 1439 studies, of which 9 met the inclusion and/or exclusion criteria. Of the 2023 patients, 788 had undergone GTR. The meta-analysis showed a significant increase in the OS and PFS duration after GTR for glioblastoma IDH-WT, with a median OS of 20 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 17-25) after GTR versus 12 months (95% CI, 9-15) after STR (P < 0.0001). The median PFS was 11 months (95% CI, 9-12) after GTR versus 7 months (95% CI, 5-7) after STR (P < 0.0001). GTR was associated with a 51% reduction in the mortality risk (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36-0.65) and a 42% reduction in the progression risk (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.88) compared with STR.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from our systematic review suggest that GTR is associated with improved OS and PFS compared with STR for glioblastoma, IDH-WT, WHO grade 4 (WHO 2021). However, our findings were limited by the various study designs and significant clinical and methodologic heterogeneity among the studies.

Antitumor Potential of Antiepileptic Drugs in Human Glioblastoma: Pharmacological Targets and Clinical Benefits

Glioblastoma (GBM) is characterized by fast-growing cells, genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity, and radio-chemo-therapy resistance, contributing to its dismal prognosis. Various medical comorbidities are associated with the natural history of GBM. The most disabling and greatly affecting patients' quality of life are neurodegeneration, cognitive impairment, and GBM-related epilepsy (GRE). Hallmarks of GBM include molecular intrinsic mediators and pathways, but emerging evidence supports the key role of non-malignant cells within the tumor microenvironment in GBM aggressive behavior. In this context, hyper-excitability of neurons, mediated by glutamatergic and GABAergic imbalance, contributing to GBM growth strengthens the cancer-nervous system crosstalk. Pathogenic mechanisms, clinical features, and pharmacological management of GRE with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and their interactions are poorly explored, yet it is a potentially promising field of research in cancer neuroscience. The present review summarizes emerging cooperative mechanisms in oncogenesis and epileptogenesis, focusing on the neuron-to-glioma interface. The main effects and efficacy of selected AEDs used in the management of GRE are discussed in this paper, as well as their potential beneficial activity as antitumor treatment. Overall, although still many unclear processes overlapping in GBM growth and seizure onset need to be elucidated, this review focuses on the intriguing targeting of GBM-neuron mutual interactions to improve the outcome of the so challenging to treat GBM.

Management of brain tumour related epilepsy (BTRE): a narrative review and therapy recommendations

Brain Tumour Related Epilepsy (BTRE) has a significant impact on Quality of Life with implications for driving, employment, and social activities. Management of BTRE is complex due to the higher incidence of drug resistance and the potential for interaction between anti-cancer therapy and anti-seizure medications (ASMs). Neurologists, neurosurgeons, oncologists, palliative care physicians and clinical nurse specialists treating these patients would benefit from up-to-date clinical guidelines. We aim to review the current literature and to outline specific recommendations for the optimal treatment of BTRE, encompassing both Primary Brain Tumours (PBT) and Brain Metastases (BM). A comprehensive search of the literature since 1995 on BTRE was carried out in PubMed, MEDLINE and EMCARE. A broad search strategy was used, and the evidence evaluated and graded based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Seizure frequency varies between 10 and 40% in patients with Brain Metastases (BM) and from 30% (high-grade gliomas) to 90% (low-grade gliomas) in patients with PBT. In patients with BM, risk factors include number of BM and melanoma histology. In patients with PBT, BTRE is more common in patients with lower grade histology, frontal and temporal tumours, presence of an IDH mutation and cortical infiltration. All patients with BTRE should be treated with ASMs. Non-enzyme inducing ASMs are recommended as first line treatment for BTRE, but up to 50% of patients with BTRE due to PBT remain resistant. There is no proven benefit for the use of prophylactic ASMs, although there are no randomised trials testing newer agents. Surgical and oncological treatments i.e. radiotherapy and chemotherapy improve BTRE. Vagus Nerve Stimulation has been used with partial success. The review highlights the relative dearth of high-quality evidence for the management of BTRE and provides a framework for further studies aiming to improve seizure control, quality of life, and indications for ASMs.KEY POINTSOffer levetiracetam or lamotrigine to all patients with primary or metastatic brain tumours who have seizure(s), irrespective of whether these are partial or generalised.ASM withdrawal for patients in remission is not recommended due to high rates of seizure recurrence.ASM prophylaxis is not generally recommended in the management of seizure-naïve patients.Both levetiracetam and lamotrigine are safe in pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Quantitative measurement of peritumoral concentrations of glutamate, N-acetyl aspartate, and lactate on magnetic resonance spectroscopy predicts glioblastoma-related refractory epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Increased extracellular glutamate is known to cause epileptic seizures in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). However, predicting whether the seizure will be refractory is difficult. The present study investigated whether evaluation of the levels of various metabolites, including glutamate, can predict the occurrence of refractory seizure in GBM by quantitative measurement of metabolite concentrations on magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS).

METHODS

Forty patients were treated according to the same treatment protocol for primary GBM at Ehime University Hospital between April 2017 and July 2021. Of these patients, 23 underwent MRS to determine concentrations of metabolites, including glutamate, N-acetylaspartate, creatine, and lactate, in the tumor periphery by applying LC-Model. The concentration of each metabolite was expressed as a ratio to creatine concentration. Patients were divided into three groups: Type A, patients with no seizures; Type B, patients with seizures that disappeared after treatment; and Type C, patients with seizures that remained unrelieved or appeared after treatment (refractory seizures). Relationships between concentrations of metabolites and seizure types were investigated.

RESULTS

In 23 GBMs, seizures were confirmed in 11 patients, including Type B in four and Type C in seven. Patients with epilepsy (Type B or C) showed significantly higher glutamate and N-acetylaspartate values than did non-epilepsy patients (Type A) (p < 0.05). No significant differences in glutamate or N-acetylaspartate levels were seen between Types B and C. Conversely, Type C showed significantly higher concentrations of lactate than did Type B (p = 0.001). Cutoff values of lactate-to-creatine, glutamate-to-creatine, and N-acetylaspartate-to-creatine ratios for refractory seizure were > 1.25, > 1.09, and > 0.88, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Extracellular concentrations of glutamate, N-acetylaspartate, and lactate in the tumor periphery were significantly elevated in patients with GBM with refractory seizures. Measurement of these metabolites on MRS may predict refractory epilepsy in such patients and could be an indicator for continuing the use of antiepileptic drugs.

Converging Mechanisms of Epileptogenesis and Their Insight in Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and advanced form of primary malignant tumor occurring in the adult central nervous system, and it is frequently associated with epilepsy, a debilitating comorbidity. Seizures are observed both pre- and post-surgical resection, indicating that several pathophysiological mechanisms are shared but also prompting questions about how the process of epileptogenesis evolves throughout GBM progression. Molecular mutations commonly seen in primary GBM, i.e., in PTEN and p53, and their associated downstream effects are known to influence seizure likelihood. Similarly, various intratumoral mechanisms, such as GBM-induced blood-brain barrier breakdown and glioma-immune cell interactions within the tumor microenvironment are also cited as contributing to network hyperexcitability. Substantial alterations to peri-tumoral glutamate and chloride transporter expressions, as well as widespread dysregulation of GABAergic signaling are known to confer increased epileptogenicity and excitotoxicity. The abnormal characteristics of GBM alter neuronal network function to result in metabolically vulnerable and hyperexcitable peri-tumoral tissue, properties the tumor then exploits to favor its own growth even post-resection. It is evident that there is a complex, dynamic interplay between GBM and epilepsy that promotes the progression of both pathologies. This interaction is only more complicated by the concomitant presence of spreading depolarization (SD). The spontaneous, high-frequency nature of GBM-associated epileptiform activity and SD-associated direct current (DC) shifts require technologies capable of recording brain signals over a wide bandwidth, presenting major challenges for comprehensive electrophysiological investigations. This review will initially provide a detailed examination of the underlying mechanisms that promote network hyperexcitability in GBM. We will then discuss how an investigation of these pathologies from a network level, and utilization of novel electrophysiological tools, will yield a more-effective, clinically-relevant understanding of GBM-related epileptogenesis. Further to this, we will evaluate the clinical relevance of current preclinical research and consider how future therapeutic advancements may impact the bidirectional relationship between GBM, SDs, and seizures.

Effect of Levetiracetam Use Duration on Overall Survival of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Wild-Type Glioblastoma in Adults

Effect of Levetiracetam Use Duration on Overall Survival of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Wild-Type Glioblastoma in Adults: An Observational Study

Pallud J, Huberfeld G, Dezamis E, et al. Neurology. 2022;98(2):e125-e140. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000013005.

Background and Objectives:

The association between levetiracetam and survival with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild type glioblastomas is controversial. We investigated whether the duration of levetiracetam use during the standard chemoradiation protocol affects overall survival (OS) of patients with IDH wild-type glioblastoma.

Methods:

In this observational single-institution cohort study (2010-2018), inclusion criteria were (1) age=18 years; (2) newly diagnosed supratentorial tumor; (3) histomolecular diagnosis of IDH wild-type glioblastoma; and (4) standard chemoradiation protocol. To assess the survival benefit of levetiracetam use during the standard chemoradiation protocol (whole duration, part time, and never subgroups), a Cox proportional hazard model was constructed. We performed a case-matched analysis (1:1) between patients with levetiracetam use during the whole du ration of the standard chemoradiation protocol and patients with levetiracetam use part time or never according to the following criteria: sex, age, epileptic seizures at diagnosis, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RTOG-RPA) class, tumor location, preoperative volume, extent of resection, and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status. Patients with unavailable O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status (48.5%) were excluded.

Results:

A total of 460 patients were included. The median OS was longer in the 116 patients with levetiracetam use during the whole duration of the standard chemoradiation protocol (21.0 months; 95% confidence interval [CI] 17.2-24.0) than in the 126 patients with part-time levetiracetam use (16.8 months; 95% CI 12.4-19.0) and in the 218 patients who never received levetiracetam (16.0 months; 95% CI 15.5-19.4; P = .027). Levetiracetam use during the whole duration of the standard chemoradiation protocol (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] .69; 95% CI .52-.93; P = .014), MGMT promoter methylation (aHR .53; 95% CI .39-.71; P < .001), and gross total tumor resection (aHR .57; 95% CI .44-.74; P < .001) were independent predictors of longer OS. After case matching (n = 54 per group), a longer OS was found for levetiracetam use during the whole duration of the standard chemoradiation protocol (hazard ratio .63; 95% CI .42-.94; P = .023).

Discussion:

Levetiracetam use during the whole standard chemoradiation protocol possibly improves OS of patients with IDH wild-type glioblastoma. It should be considered in the antitumor strategy of future multicentric trials.

Classification of evidence:

This study provides Class III evidence that in individuals with IDH wild-type glioblastoma, levetiracetam use throughout the duration of standard chemotherapy is associated with longer median OS.

Impact of Levetiracetam Treatment on 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Fluorescence Expression in IDH1 Wild-Type Glioblastoma

Simple Summary

The amino acid 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is the benchmark regarding intraoperative imaging tools for glioblastoma (GB) surgery, and is known to facilitate the extent of resection, which results in an enhanced 6 month progression-free survival rate. Recent in vitro studies suggest that antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) result in a reduction in the fluorescence quality in gliomas. To date, there is no large clinical series investigating this issue in a homogeneous cohort. Approximately 25% of all GB patients have a symptomatic epilepsy as the initial symptom at presentation. Hence, this potential dilemma is of paramount importance. We found that the preoperative intake of levetiracetam is a significant risk factor for reduced intraoperative fluorescence in IDH1 wild-type GBs. We believe that this issue must be considered in future external validations, and physicians must carefully evaluate the indication of levetiracetam and avoid a prophylactic levetiracetam treatment in terms of the suspected diagnosis of glioblastoma.

Abstract

The amino acid 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is the most established neurosurgical fluorescent dye and facilitates the achievement of gross total resection. In vitro studies raised concerns that antiepileptic drugs (AED) reduce the quality of fluorescence. Between 2013 and 2018, 175 IDH1 wild-type glioblastoma (GB) patients underwent 5-ALA guided surgery. Patients’ data were retrospectively reviewed regarding demographics, comorbidities, medications, tumor morphology, neuropathological characteristics, and their association with intraoperative 5-ALA fluorescence. The fluorescence of 5-ALA was graded in a three point scaling system (grade 0 = no; grade 1 = weak; grade 2 = strong). Univariable analysis shows that the intake of dexamethasone or levetiracetam, and larger preoperative tumor area significantly reduce the intraoperative fluorescence activity (fluorescence grade: 0 + 1). Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis demonstrates the preoperative intake of levetiracetam (adjusted odds ratio: 12.05, 95% confidence interval: 3.91–37.16, p = 0.001) as the only independent and significant risk factor for reduced fluorescence quality. Preoperative levetiracetam intake significantly reduced intraoperative fluorescence. The indication for levetiracetam in suspected GB should be carefully reviewed and prophylactic treatment avoided for this tumor entity. Future comparative trials of neurosurgical fluorescent dyes need a special focus on the influence of levetiracetam on fluorescence intensity. Further trials must validate our findings.

The efficacy of temozolomide combined with levetiracetam for glioblastoma (GBM) after surgery: a study protocol for a double-blinded and randomized controlled trial

Background

Temozolomide is applied as the standard chemotherapy agent in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) after surgery. However, the benefit of this treatment for patients is limited by the invasive growth of gliomas and drug resistance. There are indications from fundamental experimental and retrospective studies that levetiracetam has the potential to improve the survival rate of patients with GBM. However, it has yet to be determined whether the combination of temozolomide and levetiracetam is more effective than standard temozolomide chemotherapy. Therefore, we designed a randomized clinical trial to investigate the therapeutic effect of the new combined regime for treating GBM.

Methods/design

This is a double-blind and randomized clinical trial conducted in a single center. One hundred forty-two patients will be recruited and screened for the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then, eligible participants will be randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group in a 1:1 ratio. Based on the administration of radiation therapy (RT), participants in the experimental group will be prescribed levetiracetam plus temozolomide chemotherapy for 34 weeks while participants in the control group will receive placebo tablets plus temozolomide for the same duration. A 3-year follow-up will be conducted on all patients after intervention. Accordingly, the primary outcome will be progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), the objective response rate (ORR), and adverse event incidence.

Discussion

It is expected that the results of this trial will provide high-level evidence regarding the clinical benefits of levetiracetam and temozolomide combined in the treatment of GBM.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100049941. Registered on 14 August 2021

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06168-1.

The effect of levetiracetam treatment on survival in patients with glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Levetiracetam (LEV) is an anti-epileptic drug (AED) that sensitizes glioblastoma (GBM) to temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy by inhibiting O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) expression. Adding LEV to the standard of care (SOC) for GBM may improve TMZ efficacy. This study aimed to pool the existing evidence in the literature to quantify LEV's effect on GBM survival and characterize its safety profile to determine whether incorporating LEV into the SOC is warranted.

METHOD

A search of CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception to May 2021 was performed to identify relevant articles. Hazard ratios (HR), median overall survival, and adverse events were pooled using random-effect models. Meta-regression, funnel plots, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were utilized to identify sources of heterogeneity, bias, and statistical influence.

RESULTS

From 20 included studies, 5804 GBM patients underwent meta-analysis, of which 1923 (33%) were treated with LEV. Administration of LEV did not significantly improve survival in the entire patient population (HR 0.89, p = 0.094). Significant heterogeneity was observed during pooling of HRs (I² = 75%, p < 0.01). Meta-regression determined that LEV treatment effect decreased with greater rates of MGMT methylation (RC = 0.03, p = 0.02) and increased with greater proportions of female patients (RC = - 0.05, p = 0.002). Concurrent LEV with the SOC for GBM did not increase odds of adverse events relative to other AEDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Levetiracetam treatment may not be effective for all GBM patients. Instead, LEV may be better suited for treating specific molecular profiles of GBM. Further studies are necessary to identify optimal GBM candidates for LEV.

Antitumor Effect of Traditional Drugs for Neurological Disorders: Preliminary Studies in Neural Tumor Cell Lines

Glioblastoma multiforme is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Despite new treatments developed including immunomodulation using vaccines and cell therapies, mortality remains high due to the resistance mechanisms presented by these tumor cells and the function of the blood-brain barrier that prevents the entry of most drugs. In this context of searching for new glioblastoma therapies, the study of the existing drugs to treat neurological disorder is gaining great relevance. The aim of this study was to determine, through a preliminary in vitro study on human glioblastoma (A172, LN229), anaplastic glioma (SF268) and neuroblastoma (SK-N-SH) cell lines, the possible antitumor activity of the active principles of several drugs (levomepromazine, haloperidol, lacosamide, valproic acid, levetiracetam, glatiramer acetate, fingolimod, biperiden and dextromethorphan) with the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier and that are commonly used in neurological disorders. Results showed that levetiracetam, valproic acid, and haloperidol were able to induce a relevant synergistic antitumor effect when associated with the chemotherapy currently used in clinic (temozolomide). Regarding the mechanism of action, haloperidol, valproic acid and levomepromazine caused cell death by apoptosis, while biperiden and dextromethorphan induced autophagy. Fingolimod appeared to have anoikis-related cell death. Thus, the assayed drugs which are able to cross the blood-brain barrier could represent a possibility to improve the treatment of neural tumors, though future in vivo studies and clinical trials will be necessary to validate it.

Levetiracetam as a sensitizer of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: An open-label phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

An open-label single-arm phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate the role of levetiracetam as a sensitizer of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. This study aimed to determine the survival benefit of levetiracetam in conjunction with the standard treatment for glioblastoma.

METHODS

Major eligibility requirements included histologically proven glioblastoma in the supratentorial region, patients 18 years or older, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2. Levetiracetam was given at 1,000-2,000 mg daily in two divided doses during CCRT and adjuvant chemotherapy thereafter. The primary and the secondary endpoints were 6-month progression-free survival (6mo-PFS) and 24-month overall survival (24mo-OS), respectively. Outcomes of the study group were compared to those of an external control group.

RESULTS

Between July 2016 and January 2019, 76 patients were enrolled, and 73 patients were included in the final analysis. The primary and secondary outcomes were improved in the study population compared to the external control (6mo-PFS, 84.9% vs. 72.3%, p = 0.038; 24mo-OS, 58.0% vs. 39.9%, p = 0.018), but the differences were less prominent in a propensity score-matched analysis (6mo-PFS, 88.0% vs. 76.9%, p = 0.071; 24mo-OS, 57.1% vs. 38.8%, p = 0.054). In exploratory subgroup analyses, some results suggested that patients with ages under 65 years or unmethylated MGMT promoter might have a greater survival benefit from the use of levetiracetam.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of levetiracetam during CCRT in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma may result in improved outcomes, but further investigations are warranted.

Effect of Levetiracetam Use Duration on Overall Survival of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Wildtype Glioblastoma in Adults: An Observational Study

OBJECTIVES

The association between Levetiracetam and survival of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype glioblastomas is controversial. We investigated whether the duration of Levetiracetam use during the standard chemoradiation protocol impacts overall survival of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients.

METHODS

Observational single-institution cohort study (2010-2018). Inclusion criteria were: 1) patients ≥18 years old; 2) newly diagnosed supratentorial tumor; 3) histomolecular diagnosis of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma; 4) standard chemoradiation protocol. To assess the survival benefit of Levetiracetam use during the standard chemoradiation protocol (whole duration, part time, and never subgroups), a Cox proportional hazard model was constructed. We performed a case-matched analysis (1:1) between patients with Levetiracetam use during the whole duration of the standard chemoradiation protocol and patients with Levetiracetam use part time or never according to the following criteria: sex, age, epileptic seizures at diagnosis, RTOG-RPA class, tumor location, preoperative volume, extent of resection, and O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status. Patients with unavailable O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status (48.5%) were excluded.

RESULTS

460 patients were included. The median overall survival was longer in the 116 patients with Levetiracetam use during the whole duration of the standard chemoradiation protocol (21.0 months; 95%CI, 17.2-24.0) than in the 126 patients with part time Levetiracetam use (16.8 months; 95%CI, 12.4-19.0], and in the 218 patients who never received Levetiracetam (16.0 months; 95%CI, 15.5-19.4; p=0.027). Levetiracetam use during the whole duration of the standard chemoradiation protocol (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 0.69; 95%CI, 0.52-0.93; p=0.014), O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation (aHR 0.53; 95%CI, 0.39-0.71; p<0.001), and gross total tumor resection (aHR 0.57; 95%CI, 0.44-0.74; p<0.001) were independent predictors of a longer overall survival. After case matching (n=54 per group), a longer overall survival was found for Levetiracetam use during the whole duration of the standard chemoradiation protocol (HR=0.63; 95%CI, 0.42-0.94, p=0.023).

DISCUSSION

Levetiracetam use during the whole standard chemoradiation protocol possibly improves overall survival of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients. It should be considered in the anti-tumor strategy of future multicentric trials.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that in individuals with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, levetiracetam use throughout the duration of standard chemotherapy is associated with longer median overall survival.

Non-invasively measured brain activity and radiological progression in diffuse glioma

Non-invasively measured brain activity is related to progression-free survival in glioma patients, suggesting its potential as a marker of glioma progression. We therefore assessed the relationship between brain activity and increasing tumor volumes on routine clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in glioma patients. Postoperative magnetoencephalography (MEG) was recorded in 45 diffuse glioma patients. Brain activity was estimated using three measures (absolute broadband power, offset and slope) calculated at three spatial levels: global average, averaged across the peritumoral areas, and averaged across the homologues of these peritumoral areas in the contralateral hemisphere. Tumors were segmented on MRI. Changes in tumor volume between the two scans surrounding the MEG were calculated and correlated with brain activity. Brain activity was compared between patient groups classified into having increasing or stable tumor volume. Results show that brain activity was significantly increased in the tumor hemisphere in general, and in peritumoral regions specifically. However, none of the measures and spatial levels of brain activity correlated with changes in tumor volume, nor did they differ between patients with increasing versus stable tumor volumes. Longitudinal studies in more homogeneous subgroups of glioma patients are necessary to further explore the clinical potential of non-invasively measured brain activity.

How about Levetiracetam in Glioblastoma? An Institutional Experience and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

To date, there is a discrepancy regarding the role of antiepileptic drugs on glioblastoma survival. In the present study, based on large institutional cohort and enhanced with a meta-analysis of seven previously published studies, we show a robust association between the perioperative start of levetiracetam treatment with increased overall and progression-free survival in glioblastoma. Our results encourage the initiation of a prospective clinical trial to analyze the antitumor effect of levetiracetam in glioblastoma patients.

Abstract

Despite multimodal treatment, the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains poor. Previous studies showed conflicting results on the effect of antiepileptic drugs (AED) on GBM survival. We investigated the associations of different AED with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in a large institutional GBM cohort (n = 872) treated January 2006 and December 2018. In addition, we performed a meta-analysis of previously published studies, including this study, to summarize the evidence on the value of AED for GBM prognosis. Of all perioperatively administered AED, only the use of levetiracetam (LEV) was associated with longer OS (median: 12.8 vs. 8.77 months, p < 0.0001) and PFS (7 vs. 4.5 months, p = 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, LEV was independently associated with longer OS (aHR = 0.74, p = 0.017) and PFS (aHR = 0.68, p = 0.008). In the meta-analysis with 5614 patients from the present and seven previously published studies, outcome benefit for OS (HR = 0.83, p = 0.02) and PFS (HR = 0.77, p = 0.02) in GBM individuals with LEV was confirmed. Perioperative treatment with LEV might improve the prognosis of GBM patients. We recommend a prospective randomized controlled trial addressing the efficacy of LEV in GBM treatment.

Can we rely on synthetic pharmacotherapy for the treatment of glioblastoma?

Introduction: Despite decades of clinical trials utilizing conventional and novel therapeutics, the effective treatment of glioblastoma remains one of the most formidable challenges in oncology. Current standard of care includes surgery and chemoradiation. Synthetic pharmacotherapies continue to be explored as potential therapeutic options for glioblastoma patients.Areas covered: This study reviews synthetic pharmacotherapies that are currently under investigation in phase I-III clinical trials. The authors of this study highlight the mechanisms of action of the synthetic pharmacotherapy agents under investigation, outline the available evidence for their utility based on the literature, and summarize the current landscape.Expert opinion: Although warranting further investigation, the studies generally highlighted here have not shown remarkable changes in clinical benefits beyond what has already been established with radiochemotherapy. As we develop more synthetics, we will likely need to combine them with other synthetics to target multiple separate molecular pathways. There is considerable potential when this treatment strategy is guided by molecular profiling approaches which seek to stratify patients based on treatments that would be most efficacious for them.

Glutamatergic Mechanisms in Glioblastoma and Tumor-Associated Epilepsy

The progression of glioblastomas is associated with a variety of neurological impairments, such as tumor-related epileptic seizures. Seizures are not only a common comorbidity of glioblastoma but often an initial clinical symptom of this cancer entity. Both, glioblastoma and tumor-associated epilepsy are closely linked to one another through several pathophysiological mechanisms, with the neurotransmitter glutamate playing a key role. Glutamate interacts with its ionotropic and metabotropic receptors to promote both tumor progression and excitotoxicity. In this review, based on its physiological functions, our current understanding of glutamate receptors and glutamatergic signaling will be discussed in detail. Furthermore, preclinical models to study glutamatergic interactions between glioma cells and the tumor-surrounding microenvironment will be presented. Finally, current studies addressing glutamate receptors in glioma and tumor-related epilepsy will be highlighted and future approaches to interfere with the glutamatergic network are discussed.