Ju Y, Nie X, Zhu Y, Wang K, Zhou H, Ge S. Stress distribution and roof subsidence of surrounding strata considering in situ coal conversion and CO
2 mineralization backfilling: Photoelastic experiments using 3D-printed models of mining faces and goafs.
THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024;
912:169368. [PMID:
38104844 DOI:
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169368]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Coal, a reliable and economical fuel, is expected to remain the primary energy source for power generation for the foreseeable future. However, conventional mining and utilization of coal has caused environmental degradation and infrastructure damage. An in situ coal conversion method has been proposed to mitigate environmental problems and reduce CO2 emissions resulting from coal extraction and utilization. This method involves the in situ conversion and utilization of coal, backfilling of waste rock, and CO2 mineralization to backfill the goaf. In this study, the impact of mining and conversion activities on the surrounding strata was evaluated to ascertain the effectiveness and advantages of the in situ coal conversion method. Transparent stope models were created using three-dimensional printing technology. The stress distribution and deformation characteristics of the surrounding strata were examined using photoelasticity and digital image correlation methods. The results were compared with those obtained using the traditional backfill mining method. The comparison revealed that the disturbance to the surrounding strata was 14.4 times less in the in situ conversion method than in the traditional backfill mining method. Additionally, the disturbance height at the roof and the disturbance depth at the floor were 4.2 and 2.1 times lower, respectively. The roof subsidence in the in situ conversion method was 1.97 times less than that in the traditional backfill mining method. These results confirm the advantages of minimizing the disturbance to surrounding rocks and controlling the subsidence of roof strata.
Collapse