Predictors of new-onset heart failure and overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with liposomal doxorubicin

Natural Products for Preventing and Managing Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity: A Comprehensive Review

Doxorubicin (DOX) is an anthracycline anticancer agent that is highly effective in the treatment of solid tumors. Given the multiplicity of mechanisms involved in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity, it is difficult to identify a precise molecular target for toxicity. The findings of a literature review suggest that natural products may offer cardioprotective benefits against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity, both in vitro and in vivo. However, further confirmatory studies are required to substantiate this claim. It is of the utmost importance to direct greater attention towards the intricate signaling networks that are of paramount importance for the survival and dysfunction of cardiomyocytes. Notwithstanding encouraging progress made in preclinical studies of natural products for the prevention of DOX-induced cardiotoxicity, these have not yet been translated for clinical use. One of the most significant obstacles hindering the development of cardioprotective adjuvants based on natural products is the lack of adequate bioavailability in humans. This review presents an overview of current knowledge on doxorubicin DOX-induced cardiotoxicity, with a focus on the potential benefits of natural compounds and herbal preparations in preventing this adverse effect. As literature search engines, the browsers in the Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science databases and the ClinicalTrials.gov register were used.

Cardiac Safety of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin After Conventional Doxorubicin Exposure in Patients With Sarcoma and Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lifetime cumulative doses of conventional doxorubicin (>450 mg/m2) are associated with dose-dependent cardiotoxicity. In sarcoma and breast cancer, conventional doxorubicin is often utilized in the adjuvant setting, whereas pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is typically reserved for recurrent and metastatic disease. PLD is believed to be associated with reduced cardiotoxicity compared to conventional doxorubicin. Limited data exists evaluating the cardiotoxicity associated with PLD treatment after conventional doxorubicin, especially when doxorubicin lifetime doses approach the established cumulative total lifetime dose of 450-550 mg/m2. This study aims to further qualify the cardiac safety of PLD use in patients who have had prior exposure to conventional doxorubicin.

METHODS

This was a single-center, observational, retrospective cohort study conducted in patients ≥18 years with sarcoma or breast cancer who were exposed to conventional doxorubicin from an earlier line of treatment before PLD between January 2010 to May 2022. Patients were evaluated for the presence of cardiac toxicity at any point in their treatment course. Cardiac toxicity was defined as ≥ 10% decrease in left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) or a new diagnosis of heart failure within six months after PLD cessation. The time interval between the last conventional doxorubicin exposure and PLD initiation and the time interval between PLD initiation and LVEF monitoring were also analyzed.

RESULTS

494 patients were screened, and 50 met inclusion criteria: eight with sarcoma and 42 with breast cancer. The median lifetime cumulative conventional doxorubicin dose in patients with sarcoma was 450 mg/m2 with a maximum dose of 825 mg/m2 and 240 mg/m2 with a maximum dose of 300 mg/m2 in breast cancer patients. The median lifetime cumulative PLD dose was 105 mg/m2 (range: 35-150 mg/m2) in the sarcoma group and 105 mg/m2 (range: 35-510 mg/m2) in the breast cancer group. A decrease of ≥ 10% in LVEF was not observed in the sarcoma group. Patients with breast cancer had available LVEF data on PLD, and three of these patients experienced ≥ 10% in LVEF drop, with one of these patients diagnosed with heart failure. The average cumulative dose of PLD administered in patients with > 10% decrease in LVEF was 177 mg/m2 and had an average of 3.5 cycles. Five sarcoma patients initiated PLD treatment within two years after conventional doxorubicin exposure, while most breast patients initiated PLD treatment at least 10 years following conventional doxorubicin exposure. The average time from PLD initiation to first and second available LVEF monitoring was one and five months in the sarcoma group and three and eight months in the breast cancer group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

PLD administration in patients with prior exposure to conventional doxorubicin appears to be safe, with limited cardiotoxicity in patients with sarcoma and breast cancer. Future research is needed to determine if and how often routine cardiac monitoring is needed for patients on PLD without existing cardiac risk.

Anthracyclines Strike Back: Rediscovering Non-Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Current Therapeutic Scenarios of Breast Cancer

Anthracyclines are among the most active chemotherapies (CT) in breast cancer (BC). However, cardiotoxicity is a risk and peculiar side effect that has been limiting their use in clinical practice, especially after the introduction of taxanes. Non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) has been developed to optimize the toxicity profile induced by anthracyclines, while maintaining its unquestionable therapeutic index, thanks to its delivering characteristics that increase its diffusion in tumor tissues and reduce it in normal tissues. This feature allows NPLD to be safely administered beyond the standard doxorubicin maximum cumulative dose of 450-480 mg/m2. Following three pivotal first-line phase III trials in HER2-negative metastatic BC (MBC), this drug was finally approved in combination with cyclophosphamide in this specific setting. Given the increasing complexity of the therapeutic scenario of HER2-negative MBC, we have carefully revised the most updated literature on the topic and dissected the potential role of NPLD in the evolving therapeutic algorithms.

Reaching Across the Aisle: Cardio-Oncology Advocacy and Program Building

Purpose of Review

This study aims to assess the current state of cardio-oncology in reference to advocacy efforts, access to care, and perspective of stakeholders in their ability to provide patient care as well as development of “across the aisle” synergy among cardiologists and oncologists and academic and non-academic centers in various worldwide locations.

Recent Findings

During the last decade, there has been a significant and diverse growth in cardio-oncology. We reviewed the experience from cardiologists and oncologists across different healthcare systems, the global trends, the role of collaborative networks, and the importance of advocacy efforts.

Summary

Cardio-oncology will continue to grow, but there is an unmet need to increase awareness, improve education, and expand access to care to larger segments of the cancer population in order to have a more significant impact on their health. The growing collaboration through professional societies and collaborative networks provides an opportunity to advance the cardiovascular care of cancer patients to meet the projected needs in a growing and more diverse population.