Targeting mTOR and DNA repair pathways in residual triple negative breast cancer post neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Small molecule agents for triple negative breast cancer: Current status and future prospects

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer with poor prognosis. The number of cases increased by 2.26 million in 2020, making it the most commonly diagnosed cancer type in the world. TNBCs lack hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), which limits treatment options. Currently, paclitaxel-based drugs combined with other chemotherapeutics remain the main treatment for TNBC. There is currently no consensus on the best therapeutic regimen for TNBC. However, there have been successful clinical trials exploring large-molecule monoclonal antibodies, small-molecule targeted drugs, and novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). Although monoclonal antibodies have produced clinical success, their large molecular weight can limit therapeutic benefits. It is worth noting that in the past 30 years, the FDA has approved small molecule drugs for HER2-positive breast cancers. The lack of effective targets and the occurrence of drug resistance pose significant challenges in the treatment of TNBC. To improve the prognosis of TNBC, it is crucial to search for effective targets and to overcome drug resistance. This review examines the clinical efficacy, adverse effects, resistance mechanisms, and potential solutions of targeted small molecule drugs in both monotherapies and combination therapies. New therapeutic targets, including nuclear export protein 1 (XPO1) and hedgehog (Hh), are emerging as potential options for researchers and become integrated into clinical trials for TNBC. Additionally, there is growing interest in the potential of targeted protein degradation chimeras (PROTACs), degraders of rogue proteins, as a future therapy direction. This review provides potentially valuable insights with clinical implications.

Recent Advances in Drug Discovery for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is one of the most heterogeneous and aggressive breast cancer subtypes with a high risk of death on recurrence. To date, TNBC is very difficult to treat due to the lack of an effective targeted therapy. However, recent advances in the molecular characterization of TNBC are encouraging the development of novel drugs and therapeutic combinations for its therapeutic management. In the present review, we will provide an overview of the currently available standard therapies and new emerging therapeutic strategies against TNBC, highlighting the promises that newly developed small molecules, repositioned drugs, and combination therapies have of improving treatment efficacy against these tumors.

Pilot clinical trial and phenotypic analysis in chemotherapy-pretreated, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with oral TAK-228 and TAK-117 (PIKTOR) to increase DNA damage repair deficiency followed by cisplatin and nab paclitaxel

BACKGROUND

A subset of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) have homologous recombination deficiency with upregulation of compensatory DNA repair pathways. PIKTOR, a combination of TAK-228 (TORC1/2 inhibitor) and TAK-117 (PI3Kα inhibitor), is hypothesized to increase genomic instability and increase DNA damage repair (DDR) deficiency, leading to increased sensitivity to DNA-damaging chemotherapy and to immune checkpoint blockade inhibitors.

METHODS

10 metastatic TNBC patients received 4 mg TAK-228 and 200 mg TAK-117 (PIKTOR) orally each day for 3 days followed by 4 days off, weekly, until disease progression (PD), followed by intravenous cisplatin 75 mg/m2 plus nab paclitaxel 220 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles. Patients received subsequent treatment with pembrolizumab and/or chemotherapy. Primary endpoints were objective response rate with cisplatin/nab paclitaxel and safety. Biopsies of a metastatic lesion were collected prior to and at PD on PIKTOR. Whole exome and RNA-sequencing and reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA) were used to phenotype tumors pre- and post-PIKTOR for alterations in DDR, proliferation, and immune response.

RESULTS

With cisplatin/nab paclitaxel (cis/nab pac) therapy post PIKTOR, 3 patients had clinical benefit (1 partial response (PR) and 2 stable disease (SD) ≥ 6 months) and continued to have durable benefit in progression-free survival with pembrolizumab post-cis/nab pac for 1.2, 2, and 3.6 years. Their post-PIKTOR metastatic tissue displayed decreased mismatch repair (MMR), increased tumor mutation burden, and significantly lower levels of 53BP1, DAG Lipase β, GCN2, AKT Ser473, and PKCzeta Thr410/403 compared to pre-PIKTOR tumor tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

Priming patients' chemotherapy-pretreated metastatic TNBC with PIKTOR led to very prolonged response/disease control with subsequent cis/nab pac, followed by pembrolizumab, in 3 of 10 treated patients. Our multi-omics approach revealed a higher number of genomic alterations, reductions in MMR, and alterations in immune and stress response pathways post-PIKTOR in patients who had durable responses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This clinical trial was registered on June 21, 2017, at ClinicalTrials.gov using identifier NCT03193853.

Therapeutic Potential of Tumor Metabolic Reprogramming in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, with clinical features of high metastatic potential, susceptibility to relapse, and poor prognosis. TNBC lacks the expression of the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). It is characterized by genomic and transcriptional heterogeneity and a tumor microenvironment (TME) with the presence of high levels of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), immunogenicity, and an important immunosuppressive landscape. Recent evidence suggests that metabolic changes in the TME play a key role in molding tumor development by impacting the stromal and immune cell fractions, TME composition, and activation. Hence, a complex inter-talk between metabolic and TME signaling in TNBC exists, highlighting the possibility of uncovering and investigating novel therapeutic targets. A better understanding of the interaction between the TME and tumor cells, and the underlying molecular mechanisms of cell-cell communication signaling, may uncover additional targets for better therapeutic strategies in TNBC treatment. In this review, we aim to discuss the mechanisms in tumor metabolic reprogramming, linking these changes to potential targetable molecular mechanisms to generate new, physical science-inspired clinical translational insights for the cure of TNBC.

Current landscape of personalized clinical treatments for triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly malignant subtype of breast cancer (BC) with vicious behaviors. TNBC is usually associated with relatively poor clinical outcomes, earlier recurrence, and high propensity for visceral metastases than other BC types. TNBC has been increasingly recognized to constitute a very molecular heterogeneous subtype, which may offer additional therapeutic opportunities due to newly discovered cancer-causing drivers and targets. At present, there are multiple novel targeted therapeutic drugs in preclinical researches, clinical trial designs, and clinical practices, such as platinum drugs, poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, immunocheckpoint inhibitors, androgen receptor inhibitors as well as PI3K/AKT/mTOR targeted inhibitors. These personalized, single, or combinational therapies based on molecular heterogeneity are currently showing positive results. The scope of this review is to highlight the latest knowledge about these potential TNBC therapeutic drugs, which will provide comprehensive insights into the personalized therapeutic strategies and options for combating TNBC.

Recent advances in therapeutic strategies for triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most malignant subtype of breast cancer (BC) with a poor prognosis. Current treatment options are limited to surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy; however, a proportion of patients have missed the surgical window at the time of diagnosis. TNBC is a highly heterogeneous cancer with specific mutations and aberrant activation of signaling pathways. Hence, targeted therapies, such as those targeting DNA repair pathways, androgen receptor signaling pathways, and kinases, represent promising treatment options against TNBC. In addition, immunotherapy has also been demonstrated to improve overall survival and response in TNBC. In this review, we summarize recent key advances in therapeutic strategies based on molecular subtypes in TNBC.

CircINTS4 Facilitates Chemoresistance of TNBC by Competitively Binding miR-129-5p/POM121 Axis

Objectives. To detect the expression of circular RNA (circRNA) circINTS4 in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and to analyze the relationship between the expression of circRNA circINTS4 and the clinicopathological characteristics and chemotherapy resistance of patients with TNBC. Methods. Bioinformatics was used to predict that circINTS4 and POM121 could bind to miR-129-5p, and dual luciferase reporter genes proved that circINTS4 could bind to miR-129-5p and miR-129-5p could bind to POM121. RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) and RNA pull-down experiments confirmed that circINTS4 binds to miR-129-5p. The correlation among circINTS4, miR-129-5p, and POM121 was detected by qRT-PCR. Results. In ADR-resistant TNB cells, circINTS4 was significantly up-regulated, miR-129-5p was down-regulated, and POM121 protein expression was significantly up-regulated. Experimental results showed that circINTS4 knockdown inhibited proliferation, migration, invasion, and autophagy. Knocking down miR-129-5p or overexpression of POM121 reversed the inhibitory effect of sh-circints4 on the development of ADR-resistant TNBC cells. In addition, CIRCINTS4 regulates POM121 expression by sponge-adsorbed miR-129-5p. CIRCINTS4 knockdown prevents ADR-resistant tumor growth by regulating the miR-129-5p/POM121 axis in vivo. Conclusions. CircRNA circINTS4 may act as the ceRNA of miR-129-5p to regulate the expression of target gene POM121, thereby promoting the progress of TNBC molecular mechanism and providing scientific basis for circINTS4 as a new molecular target for clinical diagnosis and drug resistance therapy of TNBC.

Therapeutic progress and challenges for triple negative breast cancer: targeted therapy and immunotherapy

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer, with estrogen receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and progesterone receptor negative. TNBC is characterized by high heterogeneity, high rates of metastasis, poor prognosis, and lack of therapeutic targets. Now the treatment of TNBC is still based on surgery and chemotherapy, which is effective only in initial stage but almost useless in advanced stage. And due to the lack of hormone target, hormonal therapies have little beneficial effects. In recent years, signaling pathways and receptor-specific targets have been reported to be effective in TNBC patients under specific clinical conditions. Now targeted therapies have been approved for many other cancers and even other subtypes of breast cancer, but treatment options for TNBC are still limited. Most of TNBC patients showed no response, which may be related to the heterogeneity of TNBC, therefore more effective treatments and predictive biomarkers are needed. In the present review, we summarize potential treatment opinions for TNBC based on the dysregulated receptors and signaling pathways, which play a significant role in multiple stages of TNBC development. We also focus on the application of immunotherapy in TNBC, and summarize the preclinical and clinical trials of therapy for patients with TNBC. We hope to accelerate the research and development of new drugs for TNBC by understanding the relevant mechanisms, and to improve survival.

Post-Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies in Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

In the treatment of patients with breast cancer, post-neoadjuvant approaches represent an attractive opportunity to improve patient outcomes by stratifying adjuvant treatment according to tumor response. Thus, these concepts represent a step towards our vision of individualized adaptive tumor treatment. Although apparently in its early stages, increasing evidence indicates an important change to our historical treatment strategies.

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy enables close monitoring of tumor response in patients with breast cancer. Being able to assess tumor response during treatment provides an opportunity to evaluate new therapeutic strategies. Thus, for triple-negative breast tumors, it was demonstrated that additional immunotherapy could improve prognosis compared with chemotherapy alone. Furthermore, adjuvant therapy can be escalated or de-escalated correspondingly. The CREATE-X trial randomly assigned HER2-negative patients with residual tumor after neoadjuvant therapy to either observation or capecitabine. In HER2-negative patients with positive BRCA testing, the OlympiA study randomly assigned patients to either observation or olaparib. HER2-positive patients without pathologic remission were randomly assigned to trastuzumab or trastuzumab–emtansine within the KATHERINE study. These studies were all able to show an improvement in oncologic outcome associated with the escalation of therapy in patients presenting with residual tumor after neoadjuvant treatment. On the other hand, this individualization of therapy may also offer the possibility to de-escalate treatment, and thereby reduce morbidity. Among WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR-, HER2-positive patients achieved comparable results without chemotherapy after complete remission following neoadjuvant treatment. In summary, the concept of post-neoadjuvant therapy constitutes a great opportunity for individualized cancer treatment, potentially improving outcome. In this review, the most important trials of post-neoadjuvant therapy are compiled and discussed.

Development of Gene Expression-Based Random Forest Model for Predicting Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

Only 20–50% of patients with triple negative breast cancer achieve a pathological complete response from neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a strong indicator of patient survival. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a reliable predictive model of the patient’s pathological complete response prior to actual treatment. The purpose of this study was to develop such a model based on random forest recursive feature elimination and to benchmark the performance of the proposed model against existing predictive models. Our study suggests that an 86-gene-based random forest model associated to DNA repair and cell cycle mechanisms can provide reliable predictions of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in patients with triple negative breast cancer.

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response is an important indicator of patient survival in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), but predicting chemosensitivity remains a challenge in clinical practice. We developed an 86-gene-based random forest (RF) classifier capable of predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response (pathological Complete Response (pCR) or Residual Disease (RD)) in TNBC patients. The performance of pCR classification of the proposed model was evaluated by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and Precision Recall (PR) curve. The AUROC and AUPRC of the proposed model on the test set were 0.891 and 0.829, respectively. At a predefined specificity (>90%), the proposed model shows a superior sensitivity compared to the best performing reported NAC response prediction model (69.2% vs. 36.9%). Moreover, the predicted pCR status by the model well explains the distance recurrence free survival (DRFS) of TNBC patients. In addition, the pCR probabilities of the proposed model using the expression profiles of the CCLE TNBC cell lines show a high Spearman rank correlation with cyclophosphamide sensitivity in the TNBC cell lines (SRCC =0.697, p-value =0.031). Associations between the 86 genes and DNA repair/cell cycle mechanisms were provided through function enrichment analysis. Our study suggests that the random forest-based prediction model provides a reliable prediction of the clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and may explain chemosensitivity in TNBC.

A phase 1/2 clinical trial of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NMMA and taxane for treating chemoresistant triple-negative breast cancer

[Figure: see text].

Effector Mechanisms of CD8+ HLA-DR+ T Cells in Breast Cancer Patients Who Respond to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Simple Summary

This study contributes to the characterization of CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cell mediated-mechanisms involved in the anti-tumor response in breast cancer patients who respond to neoadyuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Cultures with plasma from responder (R), but not from non-responder (NR), patients increased the intracellular production of cytotoxic molecules and pro-inflammatory cytokines in CD8+HLA-DR+ T cells. However, the addition of neutralizing anti-IFN-γ or anti-IL-12 antibodies to cultures with plasma from R patients decreased this effector function on CD8+HLA-DR+ T cells. These results suggest the presence of soluble factors in the plasma of R patients inducing the effector function of CD8+HLA-DR+ T cells.

Abstract

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTLs) activation is an independent predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in breast cancer (BC) patients. Here, we go deeper into the function of CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cells from NACT treated HER2 negative BC patients. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cell percentage was increased in NACT responder (R) compared to non-responder (NR) patients. R patients with ER-/PR- hormone receptors had the highest CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cell frequencies, while no differences were found when patients were classified according to cancer stage or menopause status. Interestingly, the cytotoxicity and production of anti-tumor cytokines were enhanced when CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cells from healthy donors were cultured with plasma from R, but not from NR patients. The induced anti-tumor profile of CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cells was associated with plasmatic IL-12 and IFN-γ levels, increased cytokines in R patients. IL-12 or IFN-γ neutralization decreased cytotoxic activity and TNF-α production by cultured CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cells in R plasma presence. All these data suggest that an effective response to NACT in BC patients is associated with increased IL-12 or IFN-γ levels involved in the induction of cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory mechanisms in CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cells.

Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition and Immune Response in Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma

Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) is a heterogeneous group of infrequent triple negative (TN) invasive carcinomas with poor prognosis. MBCs have a different clinical behavior from other types of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), being more resistant to standard chemotherapy. MBCs are an example of tumors with activation of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). The mechanisms involved in EMT could be responsible for the increase in the infiltrative and metastatic capacity of MBCs and resistance to treatments. In addition, a relationship between EMT and the immune response has been seen in these tumors. In this sense, MBC differ from other TN tumors showing a lower number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILS) and a higher percentage of tumor cells expressing programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). A better understanding of the relationship between the immune system and EMT could provide new therapeutic approaches in MBC.