Preliminary clinical experience applying donor-derived cell-free DNA to discern rejection in pediatric liver transplant recipients

miRNAs, dd-cf-DNA, and Chemokines as Potential Noninvasive Biomarkers for the Assessment of Clinical Graft Evolution and Personalized Immunosuppression Requirement in Solid Organ Transplantation

ABSTRACT

The use of noninvasive biomarkers may reduce the need for biopsy and guide immunosuppression adjustments during transplantation. The scientific community in solid organ transplantation currently considers that chemokines, T- and B-cell immunophenotypes, and gene expression, among other molecular biomarkers, have great potential as diagnostic and predictive biomarkers for graft evolution; however, in clinical practice, few valid early biomarkers have emerged. This review focuses on the most relevant scientific advances in this field in the last 5 years regarding the role of 3 biomarkers: miRNAs, chemokines, and ddcf-DNA, in both adult and pediatric populations. An update was provided on the scores based on the combination of these biomarkers. The most-featured articles were identified through a literature search of the PubMed database. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the potential clinical applications of these biomarkers in the diagnosis and prediction of graft outcomes and discusses the reasons why none have been implemented in clinical practice to date. Translating these biomarkers into routine clinical practice and combining them with pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetic monitoring is challenging; however, it is the key to present/future individualized immunosuppressive therapies. It is essential that they be shown to be applicable and robust in real-life patient conditions and properly evaluate their added value when combined with the standard-of-care factor monitoring for graft clinical assessment. Partnership strategies among scientists, academic institutions, consortia, including expert working groups and scientific societies, and pharmaceutical and/or biotechnology companies should promote the development of prospective, randomized, multicenter intervention studies for adequate clinical validation of these biomarkers and their monitoring frequency, and their commercialization to make them available to transplant physicians.

Role of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA In Predicting Short-term Allograft Health In Liver Transplant Recipients

Background/Aims

Predicting allograft dysfunction prior to clinical or biochemical evidence remains one of the challenges in transplantation, and a preclinical detection and early management of its cause allows for improved post-transplant outcomes. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) has been proposed as an important biomarker of allograft injury and has shown to predict dysfunction prior to any biochemical derangements. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of ddcfDNA in detecting and differentiating the causes of early pre-biochemical detection of graft injury and in predicting the short-term outcomes of graft health using a patented protocol and proprietary set of single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

Methods

Blood samples were collected on defined postoperative days (1, 3, 7, and at 3 months) and were analysed through relatively economical patented protocol (Trunome™). Biopsy, biochemical tests, and clinical criteria were analysed between various subgroups.

Results

Of a total 50 patients, percentage ddcfDNA (%ddcfDNA) levels were significantly elevated in the rejection group (n = 8) as compared to that in the non-rejection group (n = 42; median elevation: 12.8% vs 4.3%, respectively), with a significant correlation (r = 0.92, P < 0.0001). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) analysis revealed that the %ddcfDNA levels can predict graft health more precisely than the conventional liver function tests (AUC for %ddcfDNA: 0.86; P < 0.001; AUC for aspartate transaminase 0.65, P = 0.08; AUC for alanine transaminase: 0.75, P < 0.01). Moreover, %ddcfDNA levels (with a threshold of >10.2%) on post-operative day 7 accurately predicted short-term (3 months) health status of the graft with 93.33% sensitivity, 94.44% specificity, 87.50% positive predictive value, 97.14% negative predictive value, and 94.12% accuracy.

Conclusion

A single-timepoint ddcfDNA on postoperative day 7 accurately predicts graft health and improves risk stratification in the short-term.

Application of graft-derived cell-free DNA for solid organ transplantation

Monitoring the status of grafts and the occurrence of postoperative complications, such as rejection, is crucial for ensuring the success and long-term survival of organ transplants. Traditional histopathological examination, though effective, is an invasive procedure and poses risks of complications, making frequent use impractical. In recent years, graft-derived cell-free DNA (gd-cfDNA) has emerged as a promising non-invasive biomarker. It not only provides early warnings of rejection and other types of graft injury but also offers important information about the effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy and prognosis. gd-cfDNA shows potential in the monitoring of organ transplants. The early, real-time information on graft injury provided by gd-cfDNA facilitates timely individualized treatment and improves patient outcomes. However, the progress of research on gd-cfDNA varies across different organs. Therefore, this article will comprehensively review the application and findings of gd-cfDNA in monitoring various solid organs, discussing the advantages, limitations, and some future research directions to aid in its clinical application.

Analysis of the primary factors influencing donor derived cell-free DNA testing in kidney transplantation

The donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) is found in the plasma and urine of kidney transplant recipients and displays notable potential in diagnosing rejection, specifically antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Nonetheless, the quantitative methods of ddcfDNA lacking standardization and diverse detection techniques can impact the test outcomes. Besides, both the fraction and absolute values of ddcfDNA have been reported as valuable markers for rejection diagnosis, but they carry distinct meanings and are special in various pathological conditions. Additionally, ddcfDNA is highly sensitive to kidney transplant injury. The various sampling times and combination with other diseases can indeed impact ddcfDNA detection values. This review comprehensively analyses the various factors affecting ddcfDNA detection in kidney transplantation, including the number of SNPs and sequencing depths. Furthermore, different pathological conditions, distinct sampling time points, and the presence of complex heterologous signals can influence ddcfDNA testing results in kidney transplantation. The review also provides insights into ddcfDNA testing on different platforms along with key considerations.

The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in the differential diagnosis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder after pediatric liver transplantation

Background

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a significant complication after liver transplantation. Research on the diagnostic value of the Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) metabolic parameters of PTLD in pediatric liver transplantation (pLT) recipients is limited. This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating between PTLD and non-PTLD lymphadenopathy in pLT recipients.

Methods

This retrospective study collected the 18F-FDG PET/CT scans with clinical and pathological information of all consecutive children who were clinically suspected of PTLD from November 2016 to September 2022 at the Beijing Friendship Hospital. The 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters of the two groups were analyzed. We then established a diagnostic model composed of the clinical characteristics and metabolic parameters.

Results

In total, 57 eligible patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 40 had PTLD and 17 had non-PTLD lymphadenopathy. Of the metabolic parameters examined in this study, total lesion glycolysis (TLG) had the highest area under the curve (AUC) value [0.757, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.632-0.883, P=0.002]. The AUCs of the other metabolic parameters were all less than the AUC of TLG, including the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) (AUC: 0.725, 95% CI: 0.597-0.853, P=0.008), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) (AUC: 0.701, 95% CI: 0.568-0.834, P=0.017), metabolic tumor volume total (MTVtotal) (AUC: 0.688, 95% CI: 0.549-0.827, P=0.040), TLG total (AUC: 0.674, 95% CI: 0.536-0.812, P=0.026). The diagnostic model, which was composed of clinical characteristics (digestive symptoms), the SUVmax, TLG, and the MTVtotal, showed excellent performance in the differential diagnosis (sensitivity: 0.675, 95% CI: 0.508-0.809; specificity: 0.941, 95% CI: 0.692-0.997; positive predictive value: 0.964, 95% CI: 0.798-0.998; and negative predictive value: 0.552, 95% CI: 0.360-0.730).

Conclusions

The 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters can be used to distinguishing between PTLD and non-PTLD lymphadenopathy in pLT recipients.

European Society of Organ Transplantation Consensus Statement on Testing for Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Kidney Allograft Rejection

To address the need for improved biomarkers for kidney transplant rejection, European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated working group comprised of experts in kidney transplant biomarkers to review literature pertaining to clinical and subclinical acute rejection to develop guidelines in the screening and diagnosis of acute rejection that were subsequently discussed and voted on during the Consensus Conference that took place in person in Prague. The findings and recommendations of the Working Group on Molecular Biomarkers of Kidney Transplant Rejection are presented in this article.

Novel Noninvasive Biomarkers in Liver Transplantation: A Tool on the Doorstep of Clinical Utilization

Biomarkers have the potential to transform the detection, treatment, and outcomes of liver transplant complications, though their application is limited because of the lack of prospective validation. Although many genetic, proteomic, and immune markers correlating with allograft rejection and graft dysfunction have been described, evaluation of these markers in combination and validation among a broad liver transplant recipient population remain understudied. In this review, we present evidence supporting biomarker applications in 5 clinical liver transplant scenarios: (i) diagnosis of allograft rejection, (ii) prediction of allograft rejection, (iii) minimization of immunosuppression, (iv) detection of fibrosis and recurrent disease, and (v) prediction of renal recovery following liver transplantation. Current limitations for biomarker utilization and opportunities for further investigation are discussed. Accurate risk assessment, diagnosis, and evaluation of treatment responses using such noninvasive tools will pave the way for a more personalized and precise approach to management of the liver transplant patients that has profound potential to reduce morbidity and improve graft and patient longevity.

Free-Circulating Nucleic Acids as Biomarkers in Patients After Solid Organ Transplantation

A number types of extracellular DNA (eg, cell-free, cfDNA) circulate in human blood, including mitochondrial, transcriptome, and regulatory DNA, usually at low concentrations. Larger amounts of cfDNA appear in any inflammatory condition, including organ damage due to a variety of reasons. The role of cfDNA in solid organ transplantation is discussed in this review as a valuable additional tool in the standard of care of transplant patients. Post-transplant monitoring requires the use of high-quality biomarkers for early detection of graft damage or rejection to be able to apply early therapeutic intervention. CfDNA complements the traditional monitoring strategies, being a risk stratification tool and an important prognostic marker. However, improving the sensitivity and specificity of cfDNA detection is necessary to facilitate personalized patient management, warranting further research in terms of measurement, test standardization, and storage, processing, and shipping. A diagnostic test (Allosure, CareDx, Inc., Brisbane, CA) for kidney, heart and lung transplant patients is now commercially available, and validation for other organs (eg, liver) is pending. To date, donor-derived cfDNA in combination with other biomarkers appears to be a promising tool in graft rejection as it is minimally invasive, time-sensitive, and cost-effective. However, improvement of sensitivity and specificity is required to facilitate personalized patient management. Whether it could be an alternate to graft biopsy remains unclear.

Graft-Derived Cell-Free DNA Quantification following Liver Transplantation Using Tissue-Specific DNA Methylation and Donor-Specific Genotyping Techniques: An Orthogonal Comparison Study

Background: Graft-derived cell-free DNA (gdcfDNA) analysis has shown promise as a non-invasive tool for monitoring organ health following solid organ transplantation. A number of gdcfDNA analysis techniques have been described; however, the majority rely on sequencing or prior genotyping to detect donor-recipient mis-matched genetic polymorphisms. Differentially methylated regions of DNA can be used to identify the tissue-of-origin of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragments. In this study, we aimed to directly compare the performance of gdcfDNA monitoring using graft-specific DNA methylation analysis and donor-recipient genotyping techniques in a pilot cohort of clinical samples from patients post-liver transplantation. Results: 7 patients were recruited prior to LT, 3 developed early, biopsy-proven TCMR in the first 6 weeks post-LT. gdcfDNA was successfully quantified in all samples using both approaches. There was a high level of technical correlation between results using the two techniques (Spearman testing, r_s = 0.87, p < 0.0001). gdcfDNA levels quantified using the genotyping approach were significantly greater across all timepoints in comparison to the tissue-specific DNA methylation-based approach: e.g., day 1 post-LT median 31,350 copies/mL (IQR 6731-64,058) vs. 4133 copies/mL (IQR 1100-8422), respectively. Qualitative trends in gdcfDNA levels for each patient were concordant between the two assays. Acute TCMR was preceded by significant elevations in gdcfDNA as quantified by both techniques. Elevations in gdcfDNA, using both techniques, were suggestive of TCMR in this pilot study with a 6- and 3-day lead-time prior to histological diagnosis in patients 1 and 2. Conclusions: Both the graft-specific methylation and genotyping techniques successfully quantified gdcfDNA in patients post-LT with statistically significant concordance. A direct comparison of these two techniques is not only important from a technical perspective for orthogonal validation, but significantly adds weight to the evidence that gdcfDNA monitoring reflects the underlying biology. Both techniques identified LT recipients who developed acute TCMR, with several days lead-time in comparison to conventional diagnostic workflows. Whilst the two assays performed comparably, gdcfDNA monitoring based on graft-specific DNA methylation patterns in cfDNA offers major practical advantages over the donor-recipient genotyping, and hence enhances the potential to translate this emerging technology into clinical practice.

Assessing Donor Liver Quality and Restoring Graft Function in the Era of Extended Criteria Donors

Liver transplantation (LT) is the final treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease. The increasing donor shortage results in the wide usage of grafts from extended criteria donors across the world. Using such grafts is associated with the elevated incidences of post-transplant complications including initial nonfunction and ischemic biliary tract diseases, which significantly reduce recipient survival. Although several clinical factors have been demonstrated to impact donor liver quality, accurate, comprehensive, and effective assessment systems to guide decision-making for organ usage, restoration or discard are lacking. In addition, the development of biochemical technologies and bioinformatic analysis in recent years helps us better understand graft injury during the perioperative period and find potential ways to restore graft function. Moreover, such advances reveal the molecular profiles of grafts or perfusate that are susceptible to poor graft function and provide insight into finding novel biomarkers for graft quality assessment. Focusing on donors and grafts, we updated potential biomarkers in donor blood, liver tissue, or perfusates that predict graft quality following LT, and summarized strategies for restoring graft function in the era of extended criteria donors. In this review, we also discuss the advantages and drawbacks of these potential biomarkers and offer suggestions for future research.

Liver Transplantation and dd-cfDNA: A Small Solution for a Big Problem

Dd-cfDNA is a novel biomarker with many diagnostic applications in various areas of medicine. In this review of the literature, we investigate its role in the diagnosis of many complications that occur in liver transplantations. In our review, we retrieved data from the medical databases PubMed and Scopus. In our bibliography, many areas concerning the contributions of dd-cfDNA to the field of liver transplantation, such as in the diagnosis of complications that include signsof rejection or graft injury, are mentioned. Dd-cfDNA, which are correlated with other biomarkers such as liver enzymes, can have a high diagnostic value. Measurements of Dd-cfDNA also depend on the graft’s size and origin; therefore, these data should be taken into account for the estimation and explanation of dd-cfDNA values. Despite the utility of this novel diagnostic technique, it comes with some limitations and applicational exclusions, such as cases where there is a blood relation between the donor and recipient.

Application of plasma donor-derived cell free DNA for lung allograft rejection diagnosis in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has been applied to monitor acute rejection (AR) in kidney and heart transplantation. This study was aimed to investigate the application of dd-cfDNA levels in the diagnosis of AR and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) among the lung transplantation recipients (LTRs).

METHODS

One hundred and seventy LTRs were enrolled at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between 1 June 2015 and 30 March 2021. Patients were divided into 4 groups: stable group, AR group, infection group and CLAD group. The level of dd-cfDNA was analyzed using target region sequencing and the performance characteristics of dd-cfDNA for diagnosis of AR and CLAD were determined, respectively.

RESULTS

Kruskal-Wallis test showed that there were some significant differences in the level of dd-cfDNA (%) among the 4 groups, with p < 0.001. Among them, the level of dd-cfDNA (%) was highest (median 2.17, IQR [1.40-3.82]) in AR group, and higher in CLAD group (median 1.07, IQR [0.98-1.31]), but lower in infection group (median 0.71, IQR [0.57-1.07]) and lowest in stable group (median 0.71, IQR [0.61-0.84]). AUC-ROC curve analysis showed that the threshold of dd-cfDNA for AR was 1.17%, with sensitivity being 89.19% and specificity being 86.47%, and the optimal threshold of 0.89% was determined of CLAD, with sensitivity being 95.00% and specificity of 76.99%.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma dd-cfDNA could be a useful tool for the assessment of lung allograft rejection, including AR and CLAD, and holds promise as a noninvasive biomarker for "allograft injury" in both acute and chronic rejection following lung transplantation.

The methylome and cell-free DNA: current applications in medicine and pediatric disease

DNA methylation is an epigenetic mechanism that contributes to cell regulation and development, and different methylation patterns allow for the identification of cell and tissue type. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is composed of small circulating fragments of DNA found in plasma and urine. Total cfDNA levels correlate with the presence of inflammation and tissue injury in a variety of disease states. Unfortunately, the utility of cfDNA is limited by its lack of tissue or cell-type specificity. However, methylome analysis of cfDNA allows the identification of the tissue or cell type from which cfDNA originated. Thus, methylation patterns in cfDNA from tissues isolated from direct study may provide windows into health and disease states, thereby serving as a "liquid biopsy". This review will discuss methylation and its role in establishing cellular identity, cfDNA as a biomarker and its pathophysiologic role in the inflammatory process, and the ways cfDNA and methylomics can be jointly applied in medicine. IMPACT: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is increasingly being used as a noninvasive diagnostic and disease-monitoring tool in pediatric medicine. However, the lack of specificity of cfDNA limits its utility. Identification of cell type-specific methylation signatures can help overcome the limited specificity of cfDNA. As knowledge of the cfDNA methylome improves, cfDNA will be more broadly applied in medicine, such that clinicians will need to understand the methods and applications of its use.

Current Status of Biomarkers and Molecular Diagnostic Tools for Rejection in Liver Transplantation: Light at the End of the Tunnel?

Strategies to minimize immune-suppressive medications after liver transplantation are limited by allograft rejection. Biopsy of liver is the current standard of care in diagnosing rejection. However, it adds to physical and economic burden to the patient and has diagnostic limitations. In this review, we aim to highlight the different biomarkers to predict and diagnose acute rejection. We also aim to explore recent advances in molecular diagnostics to improve the diagnostic yield of liver biopsies.

Elevated fractional donor-derived cell-free DNA during subclinical graft injury after liver transplantation

Personalized immunosuppression (IS) promises to improve the balance of necessary control of alloreactivity and dose-dependent adverse effects of long-term IS such as kidney insufficiency, infections, and malignancies. The majority of liver transplantation (LT) recipients exhibit graft injuries (graft inflammation and/or fibrosis) that are not eligible for an IS reduction according to current Banff criteria, even when liver enzymes are normal or only marginally elevated. This cross-sectional study evaluated the noninvasive prediction of such subclinical graft injuries in surveillance liver biopsies via donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA). Absolute and fractional dd-cfDNA increased stepwise from patients without histological signs of rejection (n = 26) over subclinical graft injury (n = 61), including subclinical T cell-mediated rejection to clinical overt T cell-mediated rejection (n = 21). Thus, fractional plasma dd-cfDNA was significantly elevated paired to surveillance biopsies with relevant subclinical graft injury according to 2016 Banff criteria compared with those with minimal or absent histological graft injury. In contrast, the presence of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies was not associated with the amount of dd-cfDNA. The sensitivity and specificity of fractional dd-cfDNA to noninvasively predict relevant subclinical graft injury was rather limited with 73% and 52% at the cutoff value of 2.1% fractional dd-cfDNA. The positive predictive value of fractional dd-cfDNA above 2.1% was 76% to noninvasively predict subclinical graft injury, calculated on the prevalence of graft injury in our prospective surveillance biopsy program, whereas the negative predictive values was not predictive (47%). In conclusion, dd-cfDNA has a rather limited diagnostic fidelity in addition to other noninvasive markers for the assessment of subclinical graft injury in personalized IS approaches after LT in a cross-sectional setting.

The integrated comprehension of lncRNA HOXA-AS3 implication on human diseases

Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) is a non-protein-coding RNA with a length of more than 200 nucleotides. Studies have shown that lncRNAs have vital impacts on various pathological processes and participate in the development of human diseases, usually through acting as competing endogenous RNAs to modulate miRNA expression and biological functions. lncRNA HOXA Cluster Antisense RNA 3 (HOXA-AS3) was a newly discovered lncRNA and has been demonstrated to be abnormally expressed in many diseases. Moreover, HOXA-AS3 expression was closely correlated with the clinicopathologic characteristics in cancer patients. In addition, HOXA-AS3 exhibited significant properties in regulating several biological processes, including cell proliferation, invasion, and migration. Furthermore, HOXA-AS3 has provided promising values in the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic strategies of several diseases such as liver cancer, glioma, lung cancer, oral cancer, gastric cancer, and even atherosclerosis. In this review, we discuss the abnormal expression of HOXA-AS3 in several human disorders and some pathobiological processes and its clinical characteristics, followed by a summary of HOXA-AS3 functions, regulatory mechanisms, and clinical application potential.

Low Levels of Hepatocyte-Specific Methylation in Cell-Free DNA Are a Strong Negative Predictor for Acute T Cell-Mediated Rejection Requiring Treatment Following Liver Transplantation

Graft-derived cell-free DNA (gdcfDNA) quantification is a promising, minimally invasive tool for detecting acute T cell-mediated rejection (ATCMR) following liver transplantation (LT). We investigated the utility of measuring hepatocyte-specific methylation in cfDNA (HS-cfDNA) to quantify gdcfDNA, examining its accuracy in detecting ATCMR in a prospective, cross-sectional study. Blood was collected from LT recipients immediately prior to graft biopsy for suspected rejection. HS-cfDNA was quantified using droplet-digital polymerase chain reaction. Prebiopsy liver function tests (LFTs) and HS-cfDNA levels were correlated with biopsy results and the primary outcome of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (tBPAR). A total of 51 patients were recruited; 37 had evidence of rejection on biopsy and 20 required treatment. As much as 11 patients needed inpatient treatment for rejection. HS-cfDNA significantly outperformed LFTs in identifying patients with tBPAR, particularly those needing inpatient treatment (area under the curve, 73.0%; 95% confidence interval, 55.4%-90.6%; P = 0.01). At a threshold of <33.5% of the total cfDNA fraction, HS-cfDNA had a specificity of 97%, correctly excluding tBPAR in 30/31 patients. Quantifying graft-specific methylation in cfDNA has a major advantage over previous gdcfDNA techniques: it does not require genotyping/sequencing, lending it greater feasibility for translation into transplantation care. Low levels of HS-cfDNA were a strong negative predictor for tBPAR (negative predictive value, 86%) and may have a future role in triaging patients prior to invasive graft biopsies.

Cell-free DNA as a solid-organ transplant biomarker: technologies and approaches

High-quality biomarkers that detect emergent graft damage and/or rejection after solid-organ transplantation offer new opportunities to improve post-transplant monitoring, allow early therapeutic intervention and facilitate personalized patient management. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (DD-cfDNA) is a particularly exciting minimally invasive biomarker because it has the potential to be quantitative, time-sensitive and cost-effective. Increased DD-cfDNA has been associated with graft damage and rejection episodes. Efforts are underway to further improve sensitivity and specificity. This review summarizes the procedures used to process and detect DD-cfDNA, measurement of DD-cfDNA in clinical transplantation, approaches for improving sensitivity and specificity and long-term prospects as a transplant biomarker to supplement traditional organ monitoring and invasive biopsies.

Donor-derived cell-free DNA levels predict graft injury in liver transplant recipients

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has been evaluated as a rejection marker in organ transplantation. This study sought to assess the utility of dd-cfDNA to diagnose graft injury in liver transplant recipients (LTR) and as a predictive biomarker prior to different causes of graft dysfunction. Plasma from single and multicenter LTR cohorts was analyzed for dd-cfDNA. Phenotypes of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (AR, N = 57), normal function (TX, N = 94), and acute dysfunction no rejection (ADNR; N = 68) were divided into training and test sets. In the training set, dd-cfDNA was significantly different between AR versus TX (AUC 0.95, 5.3% cutoff) and AR versus ADNR (AUC 0.71, 20.4% cutoff). Using these cutoffs in the test set, the accuracy and NPV were 87% and 100% (AR vs. TX) and 66.7% and 87.8% (AR vs. ADNR). Blood samples collected serially from LTR demonstrated incremental elevations in dd-cfDNA prior to the onset of graft dysfunction (AR > ADNR), but not in TX. Dd-cfDNA also decreased following treatment of rejection. In conclusion, the serial elevation of dd-cfDNA identifies pre-clinical graft injury in the context of normal liver function tests and is greatest in rejection. This biomarker may help detect early signs of graft injury and rejection to inform LTR management strategies.

Progress and challenges in diagnosis and treatment of rejection following liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver biopsy remains the most widely utilized method for diagnosis of allograft rejection following liver transplantation. However, associated risks and limitations present an opportunity for emerging noninvasive diagnostic techniques to improve upon the current standard of care. This review evaluates progress toward development of new noninvasive methods for the monitoring and diagnosing of allograft rejection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies investigate the potential of a variety of analytes. Quantification of dd-cfDNA and of DSA show potential to indicate status of allograft rejection and aid in immunosuppression modulation. Moreover, mRNA microarray profiling of differentially expressed genes, as well as characterization of cytokine responses and immunophenotypic shifts following liver transplantation, may predict and recognize rejection events.

SUMMARY

Noninvasive methods are not yet ready to replace liver biopsy as the standard of care for diagnosis of allograft rejection, though several assays and biomarkers have shown promising preliminary results. As noninvasive techniques become validated in clinical settings, their integration with current diagnostic methods is likely to foster increased sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of diagnosis.

Novel biomarkers useful in surveillance of graft rejection after heart transplantation

Heart transplantation (HTx) is considered the gold-standard therapy for the treatment of advanced heart failure (HF). The long-term survival in HTx is hindered by graft failure which represents one of the major limitations of the long-term efficacy of HTx. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and the evaluation of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are currently considered the essential diagnostic tools for surveillance of graft rejection. Recently, new molecular biomarkers (including cell-free DeoxyriboNucleic Acid, exosomes, gene profiling microarray, nanostring, reverse transcriptase multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, proteomics and immune profiling by quantitative multiplex immunofluorescence) provide useful information on mechanisms of graft rejection. The ambitious role of a similar change of perspective is aimed at a better and longer graft preservation.