Effect of initial switch-on within 24 hours of cochlear implantation using slim modiolar electrodes

Loudness Balancing Optimization for Better Speech Intelligibility, Music Perception, and Spectral Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users

HYPOTHESIS

The behaviorally based programming with loudness balancing (LB) would result in better speech understanding, spectral-temporal resolution, and music perception scores, and there would be a relationship between these scores.

BACKGROUND

Loudness imbalances at upper stimulation levels may cause sounds to be perceived as irregular, gravelly, or overly echoed and may negatively affect the listening performance of the cochlear implant (CI) user. LB should be performed after fitting to overcome these problems.

METHODS

The study included 26 unilateral Med-EL CI users. Two different CI programs based on the objective electrically evoked stapedial reflex threshold (P1) and the behaviorally program with LB (P2) were recorded for each participant. The Turkish Matrix Sentence Test (TMS) was applied to evaluate speech perception; the Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) and Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test (SMRT) were applied to evaluate spectral temporal resolution skills; the Mini Profile of Music Perception Skills (mini-PROMS) and Melodic Contour Identification (MCI) tests were applied to evaluate music perception, and the results were compared.

RESULTS

Significantly better scores were obtained with P2 in TMS tests performed in noise and quiet. SMRT scores were significantly correlated with TMS in quiet and noise, and mini-PROMS sound perception results. Although better scores were obtained with P2 in the mini-PROMS total score and MCI, a significant difference was found only for MCI.

CONCLUSION

The data from the current study showed that equalization of loudness across CI electrodes leads to better perceptual acuity. It also revealed the relationship between speech perception, spectral-temporal resolution, and music perception.

Improved Postoperative Speech Recognition and Processor Use With Early Cochlear Implant Activation

OBJECTIVE

To report speech recognition outcomes and processor use based on timing of cochlear implant (CI) activation.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 604 adult CI recipients from October 2011 to March 2022, stratified by timing of CI activation (group 1: ≤10 d, n = 47; group 2: >10 d, n = 557).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Average daily processor use; Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) and Arizona Biomedical (AzBio) in quiet at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month visits; time to peak performance.

RESULTS

The groups did not differ in sex ( p = 0.887), age at CI ( p = 0.109), preoperative CNC ( p = 0.070), or preoperative AzBio in quiet ( p = 0.113). Group 1 had higher median daily processor use than group 2 at the 1-month visit (12.3 versus 10.7 h/d, p = 0.017), with no significant differences at 3, 6, and 12 months. The early activation group had superior median CNC performance at 3 months (56% versus 46%, p = 0.007) and 12 months (60% versus 52%, p = 0.044). Similarly, the early activation group had superior median AzBio in quiet performance at 3 months (72% versus 59%, p = 0.008) and 12 months (75% versus 68%, p = 0.049). Both groups were equivalent in time to peak performance for CNC and AzBio. Earlier CI activation was significantly correlated with higher average daily processor use at all follow-up intervals.

CONCLUSION

CI activation within 10 days of surgery is associated with increased early device usage and superior speech recognition at both early and late follow-up visits. Timing of activation and device usage are modifiable factors that can help optimize postoperative outcomes in the CI population.

Early fitting in cochlear implant surgery: preliminary results

PURPOSE

Cochlear implants are usually activated 3-5 weeks after surgery; to date, no universal protocol exists regarding switch on and fitting of these devices. The aim of the study was to assess safety and functional results of activation and fitting of cochlear implant within 24 h following surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective case-control study, 15 adult patients who underwent cochlear implant surgery, for a total of 20 cochlear implant procedures were analyzed. In particular, clinical safety and feasibility were investigated by examinating patients at activation and at each follow-up. Values of electrodes' impedance and most comfortable loudness (MCL) were analyzed from the time of surgery to 12 months after activation. Free-field pure tone average (PTA) was also recorded.

RESULTS

No major or minor complications were reported and all patients could perform the early fitting. Activation modality influenced impedance values only in the short term but the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Mean MCL values in the early fitting group were lower than MCL of the late fitting in all follow-up sessions, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The mean PTA was lower in the early fitting group but the difference was not statistically significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Early fitting of cochlear implants is safe, allows for an early rehabilitation and can have possible beneficial effects on stimulation levels and dynamic range.

Early activation of cochlear implants: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

BACKGROUND

Device activation typically occurs four weeks post cochlear implant surgery. Emerging evidence suggests earlier activation is feasible and beneficial, giving patients quicker access to sound and rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVES

Assess current literature for effects of early cochlear implant activation.

METHODS

Electronic searches of Medline/PubMed, AMED, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library following PRISMA guidelines. Studies investigating any aspect of early activation were included for review.

RESULTS

From 15 studies, 625 patients received early activation, compared with 243 patients in the control groups. Early activation was considered as within 7 days post-operatively with 12 studies reporting within 1 day post-operatively, compared with standard activation of 9-46 days post-operatively in the control group. Some studies indicated earlier low levels of impedance in the early activation group. Magnet strength adjustment or off-ear processor wear was often recommended within the early activation cohort. Complication rates were low in both groups. Early activation improved patient satisfaction and anxiety levels without detriment to speech recognition or rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

Early cochlear implant activation is feasible and allows patients with no contraindications, earlier access to auditory perception and rehabilitation and reduces anxiety linked to delay in activation. Further evidence is required to monitor long-term effects of early activation.

Tissue-Engineered Cochlear Fibrosis Model Links Complex Impedance to Fibrosis Formation for Cochlear Implant Patients

Cochlear implants are a life-changing technology for those with severe sensorineural hearing loss, partially restoring hearing through direct electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. However, they are known to elicit an immune response resulting in fibrotic tissue formation in the cochlea that is linked to residual hearing loss and suboptimal outcomes. Intracochlear fibrosis is difficult to track without postmortem histology, and no specific electrical marker for fibrosis exists. In this study, a tissue-engineered model of cochlear fibrosis is developed following implant placement to examine the electrical characteristics associated with fibrotic tissue formation around electrodes. The model is characterized using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and an increase in the resistance and a decrease in capacitance of the tissue using a representative circuit are found. This result informs a new marker of fibrosis progression over time that is extractable from voltage waveform responses, which can be directly measured in cochlear implant patients. This marker is tested in a small sample size of recently implanted cochlear implant patients, showing a significant increase over two postoperative timepoints. Using this system, complex impedance is demonstrated as a marker of fibrosis progression that is directly measurable from cochlear implants to enable real-time tracking of fibrosis formation in patients, creating opportunities for earlier treatment intervention to improve cochlear implant efficacy.

A Literature Review on Cochlear Implant Activation: From Weeks to Hours

Objectives: The present literature review discusses the chronological evolution of Cochlear Implant (CI) activation and its definition among the relevant studies in the literature. In addition, the benefits of standardizing the early activation process in implantation centers worldwide are discussed. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the major databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Embase to retrieve all the relevant articles that reported early activation approaches following CI. Results: The evolution of the timing of early activation after CI has been remarkable in the past few years. Some studies reported the feasibility of early activation 1 day after the CI surgery in their users. Conclusions: Within the last decade, some studies have been published to report the feasibility and outcomes of its early activation. However, the process of early activation was not adequately defined, and no apparent guidelines could be found in the literature.

Early activation after cochlear implantation: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To systematically review the outcomes of early activation following cochlear implantation (CI) based on the findings from different studies in the literature.

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy was conducted through different databases to identify relevant articles. Our outcomes included impedance levels, rates of complications, hearing and speech perception performance, and patients' satisfaction levels.

RESULTS

The total number of included studies in this systematic review is 19, which recruited 1157 patients, including 857 who underwent early activation following CI. Seventeen studies investigated impedance levels or feasibility rates of early activation approaches. Most of these studies (n = 10) reported that mean impedance levels remarkably decreased within the first day-to-month (first measurement) post-activation. In addition, all 17 studies showed that impedance levels finally normalize and become comparable with intraoperative levels or the conventional activation group. Seventeen studies reported the occurrence of complications in their population. Ten of these studies indicated that none of their patients developed any post-operative complications after early activation. Seven studies reported the development of some minor complications, including pain 9.2% (28/304), infection 4.7% (13/275), swelling 8.2% (25/304), vertigo 15.1% (8/53), skin hyperemia 2.2% (5/228), and others 16.4% (9/55). Hearing and speech perception was assessed in six studies, which showed a remarkable improvement in their patients. Three studies investigated patients' satisfaction and showed high satisfaction levels. Only one report investigated the economic advantages of early activation.

CONCLUSION

Early activation is safe and feasible and does not impact the hearing and speech outcomes of the patients undergoing CI procedures.

Very early activation of cochlear implants: A review of the literature

Cochlear implantation (CI) has become the standard treatment for patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss. To date, an estimated 750,000 individuals spanning the entire lifecycle have benefited from this life-changing technology. Traditionally, the device is not "activated" for 3 to 4 weeks after surgery. However, an increasing number of centers have recently begun to question the conventional wisdom that several weeks are necessary and are activating their patients' device sooner after CI. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive insight to better understand the feasibility, outcomes, benefits, and limitations of very early cochlear implant activation. Data sources from published medical literature were reviewed. A detailed examination and summary were provided. History and safety were also emphasized. It was observed that approximately 20 studies have reported their experience with very early cochlear implant activation, ranging from the day of surgery to 1 week. Outcome measures are disparate, although there is general agreement that early activation is not only feasible but also provides some real-life benefits to patients and caregivers. The surgical, electrophysiological, audiological, and other outcomes were also reviewed. Very early activation is safe and beneficial in patients with cochlear implants. Many CI centers believe that such a process can lead to improvements in both patient-centered and fiscally responsible care. Although not ideal for all patients, cochlear implant programs may consider this option for their patients.

Precision Medicine Approach to Cochlear Implantation

In the early days of cochlear implantation (CI) surgery, when the types of electrodes were limited and the etiology of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was not well understood, the one-size-fits-all approach to CI held true, as in all other fields. However, in the era of personalized medicine, there have been attempts to associate CI performance with the etiology of SNHL and to establish customized surgical techniques that can maximize performance according to individual cochlear dimensions. Personalized genomic-driven assessments of CI candidates and a better understanding of genotype-phenotype correlations could provide clinically applicable diagnostic and prognostic information about questions such as who, how, and when to implant. Rigorous and strategic imaging assessments also provide better insights into the anatomic etiology of SNHL and cochlear dimensions, leading to individualized surgical techniques to augment CI outcomes. Furthermore, the precision medicine approach to CI is not necessarily limited to preoperative planning, but can be extended to either intraoperative electrode positioning or even the timing of the initial switch-on. In this review, we discuss the implications of personalized diagnoses (both genetic and nongenetic) on the planning and performance of CI in patients with prelingual and postlingual SNHL.