Prognostic value of extranodal extension in axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer

Size of Extranodal Extension in the Sentinel Lymph Node as a Predictor of Prognosis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The presence of extranodal extension (ENE) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) can predict non-SLN metastases in breast cancer (BC) patients; however, the prognostic relevance of its extent remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to examine the predictive role of ENE in SLNs measured by its widest dimension (WD), highest dimension (HD), and the WD/HD ratio for non-SLN involvement, overall, and disease-free survival (OS, DFS) in cT1-2N0 BC patients with positive SLNs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 511 women with cT1-2N0 BC and positive SLNs undergoing axillary lymph node dissection were retrospectively enrolled. The associations of ENE's WD, HD, and WD/HD ratio with non-SLN metastases, 5-year OS, and DFS were established through a multivariable modeling approach.

RESULTS

SLNs were ENE-positive in 149 (29.16%) participants, and 133 (26.03%) had non-SLN metastases. During the median 60 (16-60)-month follow-up, 69 (13.50%) patients experienced recurrences, and 62 (12.13%) died. The numbers of SLNs, non-SLNs, and total axillary LNs involved differed between the ENE-negative and ENE-positive groups, as well as between the WD/HD ≤ 1.2 and WD/HD > 1.2 subgroups (all P-values were < .001). Multivariable analyses showed significant associations of the WD/HD ratio > 1.2 with non-SLN involvement, OS, and DFS (P-values were .003, < .001, and .005, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Despite no predictive value of ENE's WD and HD, the WD/HD ratio > 1.2 was an independent predictor of non-SLN involvement, mortality, and recurrence. ENE's WD/HD ratio could be a valuable indicator for cT1-2N0 BC individuals with positive SLNs for whom further axillary treatment may be beneficial.

Predictors of recurrence in breast cancer patients with pathological partial response

OBJECTIVE

Patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a relative risk of developing recurrence. This study investigates the risk factors for recurrence in locally advanced breast cancer patients with residual disease and evaluates survival analysis.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center study. Breast cancer patients who failed to achieve a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included. Demographic, clinicopathological, and treatment characteristics were evaluated to identify predictive factors of recurrence and survival analysis.

RESULTS

We included 205 patients in this study. After a median of 31 months of follow-up, 10 patients died, and 20 developed distant metastasis. Disease-free survival and disease-specific survival were 73.8% and 83.1%, respectively. Lymphovascular invasion and non-luminal subtype were independent predictors of locoregional recurrence. In situ carcinoma, lymphovascular invasion, ypTIII stage, and non-luminal molecular subtypes were independent predictors of disease-free survival. The only independent factor affecting disease-specific survival was cNII-III. The number of involved lymph nodes was an independent predictor of disease-free survival in patients without complete axillary response.

CONCLUSION

Factors affecting disease-specific survival and disease-free survival were cNII-III and the number of involved lymph nodes, respectively. Patients with non-luminal, large residual tumors with in situ carcinoma, lymphovascular invasion, clinically positive axilla, and residual nodal involvement have a high relative risk for recurrence and may benefit from additional treatments.

Pathologic Exploration of the Axillary Soft Tissue Microenvironment and Its Impact on Axillary Management and Breast Cancer Outcomes

PURPOSE

Axillary soft tissue (AXT) involvement with tumor cells extending beyond the positive lymph node (LN+) and extracapsular extension (ECE) has been overlooked in breast pathology specimen analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 2,162 LN+ patients, dividing them into four groups on the basis of axillary pathology: (1) LN+ only, (2) LN+ and ECE only, (3) LN+ and AXT without ECE, and (4) LN+ with both AXT and ECE. The primary end points were 10-year locoregional failure (LRF), the 10-year axillary failure, and 10-year distant metastasis rates. Multivariable Cox models, accounting for clinical factors, were fitted using the entire cohort, and subgroups analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 9.4 years. The 10-year distant metastasis incidence was 42% for LN + AXT + ECE, 23% for both LN + AXT and LN + ECE only, and 13% for LN+ only. The 10-year axillary failure rates were 4.5% for LN + AXT + ECE, 4.6% for LN + AXT, 0.8% for LN + ECE only, and 1.6% for LN+ only. The 10-year LRF rates were 14% for LN + AXT + ECE, 10% for LN + AXT, 5.7% for LN + ECE only, and 6.2% for LN+ only. Multivariable analysis revealed that AXT was significantly associated with distant metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6; P < .001), locoregional failure (HR, 2.3; P < .001), and axillary failure (HR, 3.3; P = .003). Subgroup analyses showed that regional LN radiation (RLNR) improved locoregional tumor outcomes with AXT, ECE, or both (HR, 0.5; P = .03). Delivering ≤50 Gy to the axilla in the presence of AXT/ECE increased axillary failure (HR, 3.0; P = .04). Moreover, when delivering RLNR, axillary LN dissection could be de-escalated to sentinel node biopsy even in the presence of features such as AXT or ECE without significantly increasing any failure outcome: (HR, 1.0; P = .92) for LRF, (HR, 1.1; P = .94) axillary failure, and (HR, 0.4; P = .01) distant metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Routine reporting of axillary tissue involvement, beyond LNs and ECE, is crucial in predicting breast cancer outcomes. Ruling out the presence of AXT is imperative before any form of axillary de-escalation, especially RLNR omission.

Advances in Early Breast Cancer Risk Profiling: From Histopathology to Molecular Technologies

Early breast cancer (BC) is the definition applied to breast-confined tumors with or without limited involvement of locoregional lymph nodes. While risk stratification is essential for guiding clinical decisions, it can be a complex endeavor in these patients due to the absence of comprehensive guidelines. Histopathological analysis and biomarker assessment play a pivotal role in defining patient outcomes. Traditional histological criteria such as tumor size, lymph node involvement, histological type and grade, lymphovascular invasion, and immune cell infiltration are significant prognostic indicators. In addition to the hormone receptor, HER2, and-in specific scenarios-BRCA1/2 testing, molecular subtyping through gene expression profiling provides valuable insights to tailor clinical decision-making. The emergence of "omics" technologies, applicable to both tissue and liquid biopsy samples, has broadened our arsenal for evaluating the risk of early BC. However, a pressing need remains for standardized methodologies and integrated pathological models that encompass multiple analytical dimensions. In this study, we provide a detailed examination of the existing strategies for early BC risk stratification, intending to serve as a practical guide for histopathologists and molecular pathologists.

Study on the Relationship Between Differentially Expressed Proteins in Breast Cancer and Lymph Node Metastasis

INTRODUCTION

Lymph node metastasis is a cause of poor prognosis in breast cancer. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics aims to map the protein landscapes of biological samples and profile tumors more comprehensively. Here, proteomics was employed to identify differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) that were associated with lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

Tandem mass tag (TMT) quantitative proteomic approaches were applied for extensive profiling of conditioned medium of MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 cell lines and serums of patients who did or did not have lymph node metastasis, and DEPs were analyzed by bioinformatics. Furthermore, potential secreted or membrane proteins MUC5AC, ITGB4, CTGF, EphA2, S100A4, PRDX2, and PRDX6 were selected for verification in 114 tissue microarray samples of breast cancer using the immunohistochemical method. The relevant data was analyzed and processed by independent sample t test, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test using SPSS 22.0 software.

RESULTS

In the conditioned medium of MDA-MB-231 cell lines, 154 proteins were upregulated, while 136 were downregulated compared to those of MCF7. In the serum of patients with breast cancer and lymph node metastasis, 17 proteins were upregulated, and 5 proteins were downregulated compared to those without lymph node metastasis. Furthermore, according to tissue verification, CTGF, EphA2, S100A4, and PRDX2 were associated with breast cancer lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides a new perspective for the understanding of the role of DEPs (especially CTGF, EphA2, S100A4, and PRDX2) in the development and metastasis of breast cancer. They could become potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Emerging Roles of Circulating Tumor DNA for Increased Precision and Personalization in Radiation Oncology

Recent breakthroughs in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) technologies present a compelling opportunity to combine this emerging liquid biopsy approach with the field of radiogenomics, the study of how tumor genomics correlate with radiotherapy response and radiotoxicity. Canonically, ctDNA levels reflect metastatic tumor burden, although newer ultrasensitive technologies can be used after curative-intent radiotherapy of localized disease to assess ctDNA for minimal residual disease (MRD) detection or for post-treatment surveillance. Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated the potential utility of ctDNA analysis across various cancer types managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, including sarcoma and cancers of the head and neck, lung, colon, rectum, bladder, and prostate . Additionally, because peripheral blood mononuclear cells are routinely collected alongside ctDNA to filter out mutations associated with clonal hematopoiesis, these cells are also available for single nucleotide polymorphism analysis and could potentially be used to detect patients at high risk for radiotoxicity. Lastly, future ctDNA assays will be utilized to better assess locoregional MRD in order to more precisely guide adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery in cases of localized disease, and guide ablative radiotherapy in cases of oligometastatic disease.

Contemporary approaches to the axilla in breast cancer

Over the past decade, axillary management in breast cancer has fundamentally shifted. The former notion that any degree of axillary nodal involvement warrants axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has been challenged. Following publication of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial, national trends demonstrated significant reductions in ALND performance. Axillary radiotherapy in lieu of ALND is a consideration for select patients with a positive sentinel lymph node, while ongoing studies are investigating the role of adjuvant regional radiotherapy in women with positive nodes prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Efforts toward de-escalation of axillary surgery continue to evolve, as do the indications for sentinel node biopsy omission in select subsets of patients. This review highlights the recent advances and neoteric approaches to local therapy of the axilla in breast cancer.

Beyond N staging in colorectal cancer: Current approaches and future perspectives

Traditionally, lymph node metastases (LNM) evaluation is essential to the staging of colon cancer patients according to the TNM (tumor–node–metastasis) system. However, in recent years evidence has accumulated regarding the role of emerging pathological features, which could significantly impact the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients. Lymph Node Ratio (LNR) and Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes (LODDS) have been shown to predict patients’ prognosis more accurately than traditional nodal staging and it has been suggested that their implementation in existing classification could help stratify further patients with overlapping TNM stage. Tumor deposits (TD) are currently factored within the N1c category of the TNM classification in the absence of lymph node metastases. However, studies have shown that presence of TDs can affect patients’ survival regardless of LNM. Moreover, evidence suggest that presence of TDs should not be evaluated as dichotomic but rather as a quantitative variable. Extranodal extension (ENE) has been shown to correlate with presence of other adverse prognostic features and to impact survival of colorectal cancer patients. In this review we will describe current staging systems and prognostic/predictive factors in colorectal cancer and elaborate on available evidence supporting the implementation of LNR/LODDS, TDs and ENE evaluation in existing classification to improve prognosis estimation and patient selection for adjuvant treatment.

Update on sentinel node pathology in breast cancer

Pathologic examination of the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast cancer has been impacted by the publication of practicing changing trials over the last decade. With evidence from the ACOSOG Z0011 trial to suggest that there is no significant benefit to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in early-stage breast cancer patients with up to 2 positive SLNs, the rate of ALND, and in turn, intraoperative evaluation of SLNs has significantly decreased. It is of limited clinical significance to pursue multiple levels and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry to detect occult small metastases, such as isolated tumor cells and micrometastases, in this setting. Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy, who represent a population with more extensive disease and aggressive tumor biology, were not included in Z0011 and similar trials, and thus, the evidence cannot be extrapolated to them. Recent trials have supported the safety and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in these patients when clinically node negative at the time of surgery. ALND remains the standard of care for any amount of residual disease in the SLNs and intraoperative evaluation of SLNs is still of value for real time surgical decision making. Given the potential prognostic significance of residual small metastases in treated lymph nodes, as well as the decreased false negative rate with the use of cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (IHC), it may be reasonable to maintain a low threshold for the use of cytokeratin IHC in post-neoadjuvant cases. Further recommendations for patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy await outcomes data from ongoing clinical trials. This review will provide an evidence-based discussion of best practices in SLN evaluation.