Real-World Activity and Safety of Trifluridine-Tipiracil Plus Bevacizumab Therapy in Patients with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The combination of trifluridine-tipiracil and bevacizumab was compared with trifluridine-tipiracil monotherapy in a randomized, open-label, phase II trial, resulting in a statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), with tolerable toxicity in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, evidence supporting the role of this combination in a real-world setting is limited.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our work was to provide further evidence on the activity and safety of this combination in a real-world series of Western mCRC patients refractory or intolerant to previous therapies.

PATIENT AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational study of patients with mCRC refractory or intolerant to standard therapies. Patients were treated with trifluridine-tipiracil and bevacizumab. Previous therapy with fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, aflibercept, regorafenib, and cetuximab or panitumumab (only RAS wild-type) was allowed, as was previous participation in clinical trials. Clinicopathological characteristics, overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), PFS, and safety data were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

We recorded 31 patients treated between 1 December 2017 and 30 June 2022. Median age was 69 years (range 38-82 years), 39% were male, 100% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0-1, tumor location was left-sided in 77% of cases, 54% had synchronous presentation, 35% were RAS mutant, 3% were BRAF mutant, and 71% underwent primary tumor resection; 64% of patients had liver metastases, 55% had lung metastases, and 23% had peritoneal carcinomatosis. The median number of previous treatment lines was 2 (range 0-5), and 84% of patients received at least one previous anti-angiogenic agent. The ORR and DCR were 3% and 71%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 8 months (range 2-39), median PFS was 6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1-8.9 months) and median OS was 14 months (95% CI 10.1-17.8 months). Adverse events of any grade were reported in 58% of patients. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (19%) and anemia (6%); 35% of patients required either dose delays or dose reductions due to toxicity. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis was administered either on first or subsequent cycles of treatment in 35% of patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Sixty percent of the patients who discontinued treatment eventually received one or more lines of subsequent therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our series provides further evidence on the activity and safety of the combination of trifluridine-tipiracil and bevacizumab in a real-world series of Western refractory mCRC patients.

Beyond N staging in colorectal cancer: Current approaches and future perspectives

Traditionally, lymph node metastases (LNM) evaluation is essential to the staging of colon cancer patients according to the TNM (tumor–node–metastasis) system. However, in recent years evidence has accumulated regarding the role of emerging pathological features, which could significantly impact the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients. Lymph Node Ratio (LNR) and Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes (LODDS) have been shown to predict patients’ prognosis more accurately than traditional nodal staging and it has been suggested that their implementation in existing classification could help stratify further patients with overlapping TNM stage. Tumor deposits (TD) are currently factored within the N1c category of the TNM classification in the absence of lymph node metastases. However, studies have shown that presence of TDs can affect patients’ survival regardless of LNM. Moreover, evidence suggest that presence of TDs should not be evaluated as dichotomic but rather as a quantitative variable. Extranodal extension (ENE) has been shown to correlate with presence of other adverse prognostic features and to impact survival of colorectal cancer patients. In this review we will describe current staging systems and prognostic/predictive factors in colorectal cancer and elaborate on available evidence supporting the implementation of LNR/LODDS, TDs and ENE evaluation in existing classification to improve prognosis estimation and patient selection for adjuvant treatment.

Liquid biopsy in biliary tract cancer from blood and bile samples: current knowledge and future perspectives

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is an aggressive tumor characterized by a poor prognosis. In the latest years, targetable genetic alterations have been discovered in BTC patients, leading to the approval of new targeted therapies. Liquid biopsy, which is a non-invasive method for detecting tumor biomarkers from fluid samples, is a useful tool for diagnosis and molecular characterization, but also for prognosis assessment and monitoring of treatment response. In this review, recent works on liquid biopsy in BTC patients were analyzed, focusing on some relevant aspects for clinical use and trying to depict the future role of this technique. Moreover, differences between plasma and bile samples were pointed out, in light of the peculiar biology of BTC and the possibility of using bile as an alternative source of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for genomic analysis. In the era of precision oncology, the increasing adoption of liquid biopsy in BTC patients will certainly improve the management of this disease.

How Immunotherapy Has Changed the Continuum of Care in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. The use of local treatment, such as surgical resection, liver transplant, and local ablation, has improved the survival of patients with HCC detected at an early stage. Until recently, the treatment of patients with metastatic disease was limited to the use of the multikinase inhibitor (MKI) sorafenib with a marginal effect on survival outcome. New target approaches, such as the oral MKI lenvatinib in first-line treatment and regorafenib, ramucirumab, and cabozantinib in later lines of therapy, have demonstrated efficacy in patients with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh class A) and good performance status. On the other hand, the implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors directed against PD-1 (nivolumab and pembrolizumab), PD-L1 (atezolizumab), and anti-CTLA4 (ipilimumab) in the management of advanced HCC has strongly changed the continuum of care of HCC. Future research should include the evaluation of molecular biomarkers that can help patient selection and provide new insight on potential combined approaches. In this review, we provide an overview of the clinical evidence of the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in HCC, and discuss how immunotherapy has been implemented into the continuum of HCC care.

Immunotherapy in colorectal cancer: is the long-awaited revolution finally happening?

Immunotherapy has recently become a major treatment modality for several types of solid tumours, achieving remarkable and long-lasting remissions. In metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were found to be effective as treatment for deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/ microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) tumours and received regulatory approval for this indication. However, mCRC is a complex disease and dMMR/MSI-H tumours represent a minority of the cases; therefore, new strategies are needed to extend the benefits of immunotherapy to a larger population of patients. This review explores the immunological differences between dMMR/MSI-H and proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/ microsatellite instability low (MSI-L) tumours, focuses on new proposed biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy and illustrates results reported from the main clinical trials with immunotherapeutic agents in CRC, addressing the most promising approaches being currently developed.

Pancreatic Cancer Molecular Classifications: From Bulk Genomics to Single Cell Analysis

Pancreatic cancer represents one of the most lethal disease worldwide but still orphan of a molecularly driven therapeutic approach, although many genomic and transcriptomic classifications have been proposed over the years. Clinical heterogeneity is a hallmark of this disease, as different patients show different responses to the same therapeutic regimens. However, genomic analyses revealed quite a homogeneous disease picture, with very common mutations in four genes only (KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4) and a long tail of other mutated genes, with doubtful pathogenic meaning. Even bulk transcriptomic classifications could not resolve this great heterogeneity, as many informations related to small cell populations within cancer tissue could be lost. At the same time, single cell analysis has emerged as a powerful tool to dissect intratumoral heterogeneity like never before, with possibility of generating a new disease taxonomy at unprecedented molecular resolution. In this review, we summarize the most relevant genomic, bulk and single-cell transcriptomic classifications of pancreatic cancer, and try to understand how novel technologies, like single cell analysis, could lead to novel therapeutic strategies for this highly lethal disease.