Anthrax toxin translocation complex reveals insight into the lethal factor unfolding and refolding mechanism

Anthrax Toxin: Model System for Studying Protein Translocation

Dedicated translocase channels are nanomachines that often, but not always, unfold and translocate proteins through narrow pores across the membrane. Generally, these molecular machines utilize external sources of free energy to drive these reactions, since folded proteins are thermodynamically stable, and once unfolded they contain immense diffusive configurational entropy. To catalyze unfolding and translocate the unfolded state at appreciable timescales, translocase channels often utilize analogous peptide-clamp active sites. Here we describe how anthrax toxin has been used as a biophysical model system to study protein translocation. The tripartite bacterial toxin is composed of an oligomeric translocase channel, protective antigen (PA), and two enzymes, edema factor (EF) and lethal factor (LF), which are translocated by PA into mammalian host cells. Unfolding and translocation are powered by the endosomal proton gradient and are catalyzed by three peptide-clamp sites in the PA channel: the α clamp, the ϕ clamp, and the charge clamp. These clamp sites interact nonspecifically with the chemically complex translocating chain, serve to minimize unfolded state configurational entropy, and work cooperatively to promote translocation. Two models of proton gradient driven translocation have been proposed: (i) an extended-chain Brownian ratchet mechanism and (ii) a proton-driven helix-compression mechanism. These models are not mutually exclusive; instead the extended-chain Brownian ratchet likely operates on β-sheet sequences and the helix-compression mechanism likely operates on α-helical sequences. Finally, we compare and contrast anthrax toxin with other related and unrelated translocase channels.

Overview of Bacterial Protein Toxins from Pathogenic Bacteria: Mode of Action and Insights into Evolution

Bacterial protein toxins are secreted by certain bacteria and are responsible for mild to severe diseases in humans and animals. They are among the most potent molecules known, which are active at very low concentrations. Bacterial protein toxins exhibit a wide diversity based on size, structure, and mode of action. Upon recognition of a cell surface receptor (protein, glycoprotein, and glycolipid), they are active either at the cell surface (signal transduction, membrane damage by pore formation, or hydrolysis of membrane compound(s)) or intracellularly. Various bacterial protein toxins have the ability to enter cells, most often using an endocytosis mechanism, and to deliver the effector domain into the cytosol, where it interacts with an intracellular target(s). According to the nature of the intracellular target(s) and type of modification, various cellular effects are induced (cell death, homeostasis modification, cytoskeleton alteration, blockade of exocytosis, etc.). The various modes of action of bacterial protein toxins are illustrated with representative examples. Insights in toxin evolution are discussed.

Unconventional structure and mechanisms for membrane interaction and translocation of the NF-κB-targeting toxin AIP56

Bacterial AB toxins are secreted key virulence factors that are internalized by target cells through receptor-mediated endocytosis, translocating their enzymatic domain to the cytosol from endosomes (short-trip) or the endoplasmic reticulum (long-trip). To accomplish this, bacterial AB toxins evolved a multidomain structure organized into either a single polypeptide chain or non-covalently associated polypeptide chains. The prototypical short-trip single-chain toxin is characterized by a receptor-binding domain that confers cellular specificity and a translocation domain responsible for pore formation whereby the catalytic domain translocates to the cytosol in an endosomal acidification-dependent way. In this work, the determination of the three-dimensional structure of AIP56 shows that, instead of a two-domain organization suggested by previous studies, AIP56 has three-domains: a non-LEE encoded effector C (NleC)-like catalytic domain associated with a small middle domain that contains the linker-peptide, followed by the receptor-binding domain. In contrast to prototypical single-chain AB toxins, AIP56 does not comprise a typical structurally complex translocation domain; instead, the elements involved in translocation are scattered across its domains. Thus, the catalytic domain contains a helical hairpin that serves as a molecular switch for triggering the conformational changes necessary for membrane insertion only upon endosomal acidification, whereas the middle and receptor-binding domains are required for pore formation.

The Clostridium botulinum C2 Toxin Subunit C2IIa Delivers Enzymes with Positively Charged N-Termini into the Cytosol of Target Cells

The binary Clostridium (C.) botulinum C2 toxin consists of two non-linked proteins. The proteolytically activated binding/transport subunit C2IIa forms barrel-shaped homoheptamers, which bind to cell surface receptors, mediate endocytosis, and translocate the enzyme subunit C2I into the cytosol of target cells. Here, we investigate whether C2IIa can be harnessed as a transporter for proteins/enzymes fused to polycationic tags, as earlier demonstrated for the related anthrax toxin transport subunit PA₆₃. To test C2IIa-mediated transport in cultured cells, reporter enzymes are generated by fusing different polycationic tags to the N- or C-terminus of other bacterial toxins' catalytic A subunits. C2IIa as well as PA₆₃ deliver N-terminally polyhistidine-tagged proteins more efficiently compared to C-terminally tagged ones. However, in contrast to PA₆₃, C2IIa does not efficiently deliver polylysine-tagged proteins into the cytosol of target cells. Moreover, untagged enzymes with a native cationic N-terminus are efficiently transported by both C2IIa and PA₆₃. In conclusion, the C2IIa-transporter serves as a transport system for enzymes that harbor positively charged amino acids at their N-terminus. The charge distribution at the N-terminus of cargo proteins and their ability to unfold in the endosome and subsequently refold in the cytosol determine transport feasibility and efficiency.

DARPins bind their cytosolic targets after having been translocated through the protective antigen pore of anthrax toxin

Intracellular protein-protein interactions in aberrant signaling pathways have emerged as a prime target in several diseases, particularly cancer. Since many protein-protein interactions are mediated by rather flat surfaces, they can typically not be interrupted by small molecules as they require cavities for binding. Therefore, protein drugs might be developed to compete with undesired interactions. However, proteins in general are not able to translocate from the extracellular side to the cytosolic target site by themselves, and thus an efficient protein translocation system, ideally combining efficient translocation with receptor specificity, is in high demand. Anthrax toxin, the tripartite holotoxin of Bacillus anthracis, is one of the best studied bacterial protein toxins and has proven to be a suitable candidate for cell-specific translocation of cargoes in vitro and in vivo. Our group recently developed a retargeted protective antigen (PA) variant fused to different Designed Ankyrin Repeat Proteins (DARPins) to achieve receptor specificity, and we incorporated a receptor domain to stabilize the prepore and prevent cell lysis. This strategy had been shown to deliver high amounts of cargo DARPins fused behind the N-terminal 254 amino acids of Lethal Factor (LF_N). Here, we established a cytosolic binding assay, demonstrating the ability of DARPins to refold in the cytosol and bind their target after been translocated by PA.

Cryo-EM elucidates mechanism of action of bacterial pore-forming toxins

Pore-forming toxins (PFTs) rupture plasma membranes and kill target cells. PFTs are secreted as soluble monomers that undergo drastic structural rearrangements upon interacting with the target membrane and generate transmembrane oligomeric pores. A detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the pore-formation process remains unclear due to limited structural insights regarding the transmembrane oligomeric pore states of the PFTs. However, recent advances in the field of cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) have led to the high-resolution structure determination of the oligomeric pore forms of diverse PFTs. Here, we discuss the pore-forming mechanisms of various PFTs, specifically the mechanistic details contributed by the cryo-EM-based structural studies.

Challenges and approaches to studying pore-forming proteins

Pore-forming proteins (PFPs) are a broad class of molecules that comprise various families, structural folds, and assembly pathways. In nature, PFPs are most often deployed by their host organisms to defend against other organisms. In humans, this is apparent in the immune system, where several immune effectors possess pore-forming activity. Furthermore, applications of PFPs are found in next-generation low-cost DNA sequencing, agricultural crop protection, pest control, and biosensing. The advent of cryoEM has propelled the field forward. Nevertheless, significant challenges and knowledge-gaps remain. Overcoming these challenges is particularly important for the development of custom, purpose-engineered PFPs with novel or desired properties. Emerging single-molecule techniques and methods are helping to address these unanswered questions. Here we review the current challenges, problems, and approaches to studying PFPs.