Choice of antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing carotid angioplasty and stenting: a nationwide population-based study

Antithrombotic Therapy in High Bleeding Risk, Part II: Noncardiac Percutaneous Interventions

Over the past decades, there have been great advancements in the antithrombotic management of patients undergoing percutaneous interventions, but most of the available evidence derives from studies conducted in the setting of cardiac interventions. Antithrombotic treatment regimens used in patients undergoing percutaneous cardiac interventions, in particular coronary, are frequently extrapolated to patients undergoing noncardiac interventions. However, the differences in risk profile of the population treated and the types of interventions performed may translate into differences is the safety and efficacy associated with antithrombotic therapy. Noncardiac percutaneous interventions are commonly performed in patients at high bleeding risk, which may indeed impact outcomes, hence underscoring the importance of risk stratification to guide clinical decision-making processes. In this review, we appraise the available evidence on antithrombotic therapy in high-bleeding-risk patients undergoing noncardiac percutaneous interventions.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Carotid Artery and Intracranial Artery Stent

Optimal platelet inhibition is critical in patients with carotid and intracranial artery stenosis undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) and intracranial artery stenting (ICS). Many reports have highlighted the importance of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in reducing adverse neurological outcomes without a significant increase in bleeding complications during CAS. DAPT has commonly used CAS and ICS, typically with aspirin and clopidogrel, but clopidogrel resistance occurs in approximately 20% of Japanese and other Asian populations. One solution to clopidogrel resistance is using adjunctive cilostazol to suppress the frequency of stroke events and in-stent restenosis after CAS. Other antiplatelet agents such as prasugrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor, and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors are under investigation. The duration of DAPT after CAS remains controversial, as a longer duration of DAPT after CAS is associated with lower rates of readmission for stroke, but increased risk of hemorrhagic complications. Regarding antithrombotic therapy in CAS with concomitant atrial fibrillation, the use of direct oral anticoagulants plus a P2Y12 inhibitor may be suggested for the optimal safety and efficacy of antithrombotic management. For emergent CAS in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), intraprocedural DAPT loading and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, as necessary, may improve stent patency without increasing the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. In ICS, aggressive antiplatelet therapy based on an assessment of platelet aggregation is also important to improve clinical outcomes. In addition, rescue stenting for AIS caused by intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related large vessel occlusion is gaining attention. GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have shown promise, but are not approved in Japan. In conclusion, DAPT is essential for the perioperative management of CAS and ICS. Specific perioperative antithrombotic management remains unclear, but the potential benefits of antithrombotic agents must be weighed against the corresponding increased risk of bleeding complications.

Antithrombotic treatment and outcome after endovascular treatment and acute carotid artery stenting in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the mainstay of secondary prevention in ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, in AF patients with large vessel occlusion stroke treated by endovascular therapy (ET) and acute carotid artery stenting (CAS), the optimal antithrombotic medication remains unclear.

METHODS

This is a subgroup analysis of the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment (GSR-ET), a prospective multicenter cohort of patients with large vessel occlusion stroke undergoing ET. Patients with AF and CAS during ET were included. We analyzed baseline and periprocedural characteristics, antithrombotic strategies and functional outcome at 90 days.

RESULTS

Among 6635 patients in the registry, a total of 82 patients (1.2%, age 77.9 ± 8.0 years, 39% female) with AF and extracranial CAS during ET were included. Antithrombotic medication at admission, during ET, postprocedural and at discharge was highly variable and overall mortality in hospital (21%) and at 90 days (39%) was high. Among discharged patients (n = 65), most frequent antithrombotic regimes were dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, 37%), single APT + OAC (25%) and DAPT + OAC (20%). Comparing DAPT to single or dual APT + OAC, clinical characteristics at discharge were similar (median NIHSS 7.5 [interquartile range, 3-10.5] vs 7 [4-11], p = 0.73, mRS 4 [IQR 3-4] vs. 4 [IQR 3-5], p = 0.79), but 90-day mortality was higher without OAC (32 vs 4%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In AF patients who underwent ET and CAS, 90-day mortality was higher in patients not receiving OAC.

REGISTRATION

https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03356392.

OUP accepted manuscript

The management of patients with stroke is often multidisciplinary, involving various specialties and healthcare professionals. Given the common shared risk factors for stroke and cardiovascular disease, input may also be required from the cardiovascular teams, as well as patient caregivers and next-of-kin. Ultimately, the patient is central to all this, requiring a coordinated and uniform approach to the priorities of post-stroke management, which can be consistently implemented by different multidisciplinary healthcare professionals, as part of the patient ‘journey’ or ‘patient pathway,’ supported by appropriate education and tele-medicine approaches. All these aspects would ultimately aid delivery of care and improve patient (and caregiver) engagement and empowerment. Given the need to address the multidisciplinary approach to holistic or integrated care of patients with heart disease and stroke, the European Society of Cardiology Council on Stroke convened a Task Force, with the remit to propose a consensus on Integrated care management for optimizing the management of stroke and associated heart disease. The present position paper summarizes the available evidence and proposes consensus statements that may help to define evidence gaps and simple practical approaches to assist in everyday clinical practice. A post-stroke ABC pathway is proposed, as a more holistic approach to integrated stroke care, would include three pillars of management:

A: Appropriate Antithrombotic therapy.

B: Better functional and psychological status.

C: Cardiovascular risk factors and Comorbidity optimization (including lifestyle changes).