Optical coherence tomography and imaging biomarkers as outcome predictors in diabetic macular edema treated with dexamethasone implant

Management of treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema patients: Review of real-world clinical data

The high prevalence of Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a real global health problem. Its complex pathophysiology involves different pathways. Over the last decade, the introduction of intravitreal treatments has dramatically changed the management and prognosis of DME. Among the different treatment options, inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and intravitreal steroids implants represent the first-line therapy of DME. We conducted a review of electronic databases to compile the available evidence about the clinical management of DME in a clinical setting, with a special focus on treatment-naïve patients. Anti-VEGF therapies represent a valuable option for treating DME patients. However, many patients do not respond properly to this treatment and, due to its administration regimen, many patients receive suboptimal treatment in real life. Current evidence demonstrated that in patients with DME, DEX-i improved significantly both anatomic and visual outcomes. Besides eyes with insufficient anti-VEGF respond or recalcitrant DME cases, DEX-i can be effectively and safely used in treatment-naïve DME patients as first line therapy. DEX-i may be considered first line therapy in different clinical scenarios, such as DME eyes with a greater inflammatory component, patients with cardiovascular events, vitrectomized eyes, or those requiring cataract surgery. In conclusion, there are still many points for improvement pending in the clinical management of the patient with DME. Since DME treatment must follow a patient-tailored approach, selecting the best therapeutic approach for each patient requires a good understanding of the pathophysiology of DME.

Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema Eyes Treated with Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant

BACKGROUND

The aim was to evaluate predictive value of baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) parameters in diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with dexamethasone implant (DEXi).

METHODS

OCT and OCTA parameters were collected: central macular thickness (CMT), vitreomacular abnormalities (VMIAs), intraretinal and subretinal fluid (mixed DME pattern), hyper-reflective foci (HRF), microaneurysms (MAs) reflectivity, ellipsoid zone disruption, suspended scattering particles in motion (SSPiM), perfusion density (PD), vessel length density, and foveal avascular zone. Responders' (RES) and non-responders' (n-RES) eyes were classified considering morphological (CMT reduction ≥ 10%) and functional (BCVA change ≥ 5 ETDRS letters) changes after DEXi. Binary logistic regression OCT, OCTA, and OCT/OCTA-based models were developed.

RESULTS

Thirty-four DME eyes were enrolled (18 treatment-naïve). OCT-based model combining DME mixed pattern + MAs + HRF and OCTA-based model combining SSPiM and PD showed the best performance to correctly classify the morphological RES eyes. In the treatment-naïve eyes, VMIAs were included with a perfect fit for n-RES eyes.

CONCLUSION

The presence of DME mixed pattern, a high number of parafoveal HRF, hyper-reflective MAs, SSPiM in the outer nuclear layers, and high PD represent baseline predictive biomarkers for DEXi treatment responsiveness. The application of these models to treatment-naïve patients allowed a good identification of n-RES eyes.

Predictive impact of optical coherence tomography biomarkers in anti-vascular endothelial growth factor resistant macular edema treated with dexamethasone implant

PURPOSE

To perform a longitudinal analysis of the effect of optic coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers on macular thickness in patients with persistent macular edema secondary to diabetes mellitus and retinal vein occlusion who recieved intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant.

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients were included in the retrospective study. Patients with anti-VEGF-resistant macular edema were included in the study. The effect of the presence or absence of OCT biomarkers before intravitreal DEX implant therapy on central foveal thickness (CFT) was evaluated. In addition, the change in biomarkers from the baseline visit to the final visit was evaluated. The evaluated OCT biomarkers were as follows: ellipsoid zone and external limiting membrane (ELM) integrity, hyperreflective foci (HRF), disorganization of inner retinal layers (DRIL), hard exudates, serous macular detachment (SMD), pearl necklace, posterior vitreous detachment and the epiretinal membrane (ERM).

RESULTS

The mean age of the overall sample in the study was 64.4 ± 9.6. CFT decreased significantly from 625.3 ± 22.3 μm at baseline to 365.0 ± 21.7 μm in the 1st month but increased significantly to 430.2 ± 22.6 μm in the 3rd month. In the presence of HRF and SMD, recurrence of macular edema was significant in the 3rd month. The percentage of ELM disruption, DRIL, and ERM deteriorated significantly and the percentage of SMD improved significantly at the final visit.

CONCLUSIONS

DEX implant therapy resulted in a satisfactory reduction in CFT in patients with DME and RVO. The presence of HRF and SMD is a negative predictor of recurrence in CFT in short term. DEX implant therapy resulted in satisfactory improvement in SMD.