Increasing trend of radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis in rheumatoid arthritis patients before total knee arthroplasty

A socially interdependent choice framework for social influences in healthcare decision-making: a study protocol

OBJECTIVES

Current choice models in healthcare (and beyond) can provide suboptimal predictions of healthcare users' decisions. One reason for such inaccuracy is that standard microeconomic theory assumes that decisions of healthcare users are made in a social vacuum. Healthcare choices, however, can in fact be (entirely) socially determined. To achieve more accurate choice predictions within healthcare and therefore better policy decisions, the social influences that affect healthcare user decision-making need to be identified and explicitly integrated into choice models. The purpose of this study is to develop a socially interdependent choice framework of healthcare user decision-making.

DESIGN

A mixed-methods approach will be used. A systematic literature review will be conducted that identifies the social influences on healthcare user decision-making. Based on the outcomes of a systematic literature review, an interview guide will be developed that assesses which, and how, social influences affect healthcare user decision-making in four different medical fields. This guide will be used during two exploratory focus groups to assess the engagement of participants and clarity of questions and probes. The refined interview guide will be used to conduct the semistructured interviews with healthcare professionals and users. These interviews will explore in detail which, and how, social influences affect healthcare user decision-making. Focus group and interview transcripts will be analysed iteratively using a constant comparative approach based on a mix of inductive and deductive coding. Based on the outcomes, a social influence independent choice framework for healthcare user decision-making will be drafted. Finally, the Delphi technique will be employed to achieve consensus about the final version of this choice framework.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management Research Ethics Review Committee (ESHPM, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; reference ETH2122-0666).

Postoperative function of patients with rheumatoid arthritis after total knee arthroplasty in the last decade was comparable in the unadjusted cohort but inferior in the propensity score matched cohort with that of patients with osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

The perioperative pain and function of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) approach those in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). This study aimed to evaluate whether the clinical outcomes, especially functions, of patients with RA reached those of OA, utilizing a background-matched cohort.

METHODS

Patients who underwent TKA between 2013 and 2021 were enrolled. Preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative scores, specifically the Original Knee Society Score (OKSS) and New Knee Society Score (2011KSS), between RA and OA were compared. Clinical assessments were performed on unadjusted and propensity-score matched cohorts, ensuring age, sex, body mass index, and valgus deformity rate parity.

RESULTS

In an unadjusted cohort involving 98 patients with RA and 560 patients with OA, patients with RA demonstrated inferior preoperative OKSS-Function Score (FS) but similar postoperative functional scores to OA patients. In the matched cohort of 83, patients with RA displayed lower preoperative OKSS- FS (median difference: 20, P < 0.001) and 2011KSS functional activities (difference: 9, P = 0.01) beyond minimum clinically important differences than patients with OA. Patients with RA improved more in OKSS-FS, yielding no postoperative difference compared with patients with OA. However, postoperative 2011KSS functional activities remained lower in patients with RA (difference: 9.5, P = 0.03), especially in advanced functions, than in those with OA.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative function showed no difference between patients with RA and OA in the unadjusted cohort; within the background-matched cohort, postoperative function, especially advanced function, was inferior in patients with RA to those with OA.

Relationship of weight change patterns from young to middle adulthood with incident rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The relationship between weight change patterns and arthritis onset, specifically rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA), is unclear. We examined the association between weight changes from young adulthood to midlife and arthritis onset.

Methods

Using data from NHANES 1999-2018, participants with self-reported arthritis were selected. Age at diagnosis determined arthritis onset. Weight change patterns were based on BMI at age 25 and 10 years before the survey. Patterns were categorized as stable non-obese, non-obese to obese, obese to non-obese, and stable obese. Cox regression models and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis were employed, calculating hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) considering covariates.

Results

Out of 20,859 participants (male 11,017, 52.82%), 4922 developed arthritis over a mean 8.66-year follow-up. Compared to stable non-obese individuals, the HRs for arthritis were 1.55 (95% CI=1.45 to 1.66, P < 0.0001) for non-obese to obese and 1.74 (95% CI=1.56 to 1.95, P < 0.0001) for stable obese. Those gaining 10-20 kg had a HR of 1.33 (95% CI=1.22 to 1.46, P < 0.0001), and gains >20 kg had a HR of 1.56 (95% CI=1.42 to 1.71, P < 0.0001), compared to stable weight (change within 2.5 kg). Identical results observed for OA and RA. RCS showed a nonlinear relationship between weight change and arthritis (all P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Stable obesity and weight gain during adulthood increase arthritis risk. Maintaining a non-obese weight throughout adult years might reduce arthritis risk in later life.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes following total knee arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis versus for osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) are considered to be a successful procedure, but with little being known about outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of TKA in patients with RA versus OA.

METHODS

Data were obtained from PubMed, Cochrane Library, EBSCO and Scopus for all available studies comparing the outcomes of THA in RA and OA patients (From January 1, 2000 to October 15, 2022). Outcomes of interest included infection, revision, venous thromboembolism (VTE), mortality, periprosthetic fractures, prosthetic loosening, length of stay, and satisfaction. Two reviewers independently assessed each study for quality and extracted data. The quality of the studies was scored using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS).

RESULTS

Twenty-four articles with a total 8,033,554 patients were included in this review. The results found strong evidence for increased risk of overall infection (OR = 1.61, 95% CI, 1.24-2.07; P = 0.0003), deep infection (OR = 2.06, 95% CI, 1.37-3.09; P = 0.0005), VTE (OR = 0.76, 95% CI, 0.61-0.93; P = 0.008), pulmonary embolism (PE) (OR = 0.84, 95% CI, 0.78-0.90; P<0.00001), periprosthetic fractures (OR = 1.87, 95% CI, 1.60-2.17; P<0.00001); and reasonable evidence for increased risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (OR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.54-0.99; P = 0.05), and length of stay (OR = 0.07, 95% CI, 0.01-0.14; P = 0.03) after TKA in patients with RA versus OA. There were no significant differences in superficial site infection (OR = 0.84,95% CI, 0.47-1.52; P = 0.57), revision (OR = 1.33,95% CI, 0.79-2.23; P = 0.28), mortality (OR = 1.16,95% CI, 0.87-1.55; P = 0.32), and prosthetic loosening (OR = 1.75, 95% CI, 0.56-5.48; P = 0.34) between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that patients with RA have a higher risk of postoperative infection, VTE, periprosthetic fracture, and lengths of stay, but did not increase revision rate, prosthetic loosening and mortality compared to patients with OA following TKA. In conclusion, despite RA increased incidence of postoperative complications, TKA should continue to be presented as an effective surgical procedure for patients whose conditions are intractable to conservative and medical management of RA.