Metformin use and the risk of total knee replacement among diabetic patients: a propensity-score-matched retrospective cohort study

Metformin as adjuvant therapy in obese knee osteoarthritis patients

AIMS

This study aimed at investigating the efficacy of metformin as adjuvant therapy for obese knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients, considering its anti-inflammatory and cartilage-protective effects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 50 obese knee OA patients were assigned randomly to two groups, the metformin group (n = 25) which was treated with metformin 500 mg orally BID plus celecoxib 200 mg orally once daily, and the placebo group (n = 25) which was treated with placebo tablets BID plus celecoxib 200 mg orally once daily for 12 weeks. Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein (COMP), C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-1), and Interleukin 1-beta (IL-1β) serum levels were measured, while Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score assessed knee pain, stiffness, and physical function at baseline and after 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Following a 12-week treatment, the metformin group exhibited significantly reduced levels of COMP, CTX-1, and IL-1β in the serum compared to the placebo group (p = 0.0081, p = 0.0106, and p = 0.0223, respectively). Furthermore, metformin group produced significant improvements in WOMAC total scale (p < 0.0001), specifically in knee pain, stiffness, and physical function compared to placebo group (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, and p < 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Metformin as an adjuvant therapy in obese knee OA patients may have beneficial effects on cartilage degradation and inflammation, as evidenced by the significant decreases in serum COMP, CTX-1, and IL-1β levels. Additionally, metformin may improve clinical outcomes, as shown by the significant improvements in WOMAC scores.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV ID

NCT05638893/Registered December 6, 2022 - Retrospectively.

Repurposing drugs for the treatment of osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

Currently, no disease-modifying therapies for osteoarthritis (OA) exist, and attempts to identify novel cellular targets have been challenging. Risk factors for OA include advanced age, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. This creates an attractive opportunity to repurpose existing drugs that are used to treat comorbidities commonly encountered in patients with OA, if those drugs possess OA disease modifying properties.

METHODS

This narrative review incorporates findings from knee or hand OA randomized clinical trials, post-hoc clinical trial analyses, prospective cohort studies, and observational data.

RESULTS

Drugs used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (methotrexate; TNFa, IL-1, and IL-6 pathway inhibitors; hydroxychloroquine), atopic/allergic disease (anti-histamines), osteoporosis (bisphosphonates and vitamin D), type 2 diabetes (metformin and GLP-1 agonists), and cardiovascular disease (atorvastatin, fish oil, and beta blockers) were reviewed for their potential benefit in OA. This review outlines the successful attributes of repurposed drugs, the challenges in repurposing drugs, and strategies for future clinical trials to support OA drug repurposing. Potential drug candidates for OA may be identified through the use of existing datasets and via collaborations with researchers in other fields to include OA endpoints in future clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

Given the association of OA with several commonly treated comorbidities, drug repurposing is an appealing approach that could provide a favorable benefit-to-risk ratio for chronic OA treatment.

Osteoarthritis year in review 2023: Epidemiology & therapy

OBJECTIVE

To highlight some important findings from osteoarthritis (OA) epidemiology and therapy research undertaken over the past year.

METHODS

Search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases between April 1, 2022 to March 3, 2023 using "exp *Osteoarthritis/" as the preliminary search term. The search was limited to articles published in English and including human subjects. Final inclusions were based on perceived importance and results that may inform improved identification of risk factors or OA treatments, as well as OA subgroups of potential relevance to risk factors or treatment approaches.

RESULTS

3182 studies were screened, leaving 208 eligible for inclusion. This narrative review of thirty-three selected studies was arranged into: a) OA predictors - population-based studies, b) Specific predictors of OA and OA outcome; c) Intra-articular injections, and d) OA phenotypes. There was some suggestion of sex differences in predictors of incidence or outcomes. Body mass index changes appear largely to affect knee OA outcomes. Evidence points to a lack of benefit of viscosupplementation in knee OA; findings were variable for other injectables. Studies of OA phenotypes reveal potentially relevant clinical and pathophysiological differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying risk factors for the incidence/progression of OA represents an ongoing and important area of OA research. Sex may play a role in this understanding and bears consideration and further study. For knee injectables other than viscosupplementation, additional high-quality trials appear warranted. Continued investigation and application of phenotyping across the OA disease, illness and care spectrum may be key to developing disease-modifying agents and their appropriate selection for individuals.

Metformin Reduces the Risk of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Elderly Patients with Hip Osteoarthritis and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Purpose

To assess if metformin could reduce the risk of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly patients with hip osteoarthritis and type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Patients and Methods

It is a retrospective study among elderly patients (≥65 years) with hip osteoarthritis and T2DM. All included patients were divided into metformin group and non-metformin group, then propensity-score match (PSM) was performed to control potential confounding factors. The primary endpoint was the incidence of the first THA during the study period. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was employed to evaluate the association of metformin with the risk of THA.

Results

A matched cohort of 716 patients were finally included, with 308 metformin users and 308 metformin non-users. During a maximum follow-up of 10 years, the incidence of THA in metformin users was significantly lower than that in non-users (4.9% vs 25.0%, P<0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that metformin users were significantly associated with a lower risk of THA compared with non-users (HR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.10-0.30; P<0.01). In addition, further analyses indicated that participants with long-term metformin use (HR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.02-0.46; P<0.01) or high metformin dosage (HR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04-0.57; P<0.01) had a lower risk of THA.

Conclusion

Metformin use could reduce the risk of THA in patients with hip osteoarthritis and T2DM, and the effect is accumulative and dose dependent.

What is new in pharmacological treatment for osteoarthritis?

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease in which structural changes of hyaline articular cartilage, subchondral bone, ligaments, capsule, synovium, muscles, and periarticular changes are involved. The knee is the most commonly affected joint, followed by the hand, hip, spine, and feet. Different pathological mechanisms are at play in each of these various involvement sites. Although systemic inflammation is more prominent in hand OA, knee and hip OA have been associated with excessive joint load and injury. As OA has varied phenotypes and the primarily affected tissues differ, treatment options must be tailored accordingly. In recent years, ongoing efforts have been made to develop disease-modifying options that halt or slow disease progression. Many are still in clinical trials, and as insights into the pathogenesis of OA evolve, novel therapeutic strategies will be developed. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the novel and emerging strategies in the management of OA.

Development of Osteoarthritis in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Metformin vs a Sulfonylurea

IMPORTANCE

Metformin may have a protective association against developing osteoarthritis (OA), but robust epidemiological data are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk of OA and joint replacement in individuals with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin compared with a sulfonylurea.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study used claims data from the Optum deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database between December 2003 and December 2019. Participants included individuals aged 40 years or older with at least 1 year of continuous enrollment and type 2 diabetes. Individuals with type 1 diabetes or a prior diagnosis of OA, inflammatory arthritis, or joint replacement were excluded. Time-conditional propensity score matching was conducted using age, sex, race, Charlson comorbidity score, and treatment duration to create a prevalent new-user cohort. Data were analyzed from April to December 2021.

EXPOSURES

Treatment with metformin or a sulfonylurea.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The outcomes of interest were incident OA and joint replacement. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of incident OA and joint replacement. In a sensitivity analysis, individuals only ever treated with metformin were compared with individuals only ever treated with a sulfonylurea, allowing for longer-term follow up of the outcome (even after stopping the medication of interest).

RESULTS

After time-conditional propensity score matching, the metformin and control groups each included 20 937 individuals (mean [SD] age 62.0 [11.5] years; 24 379 [58.2%] males). In the adjusted analysis, the risk of developing OA was reduced by 24% for individuals treated with metformin compared with a sulfonylurea (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.85; P < .001), but there was no significant difference for risk of joint replacement (aHR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.50-1.27; P = .34). In the sensitivity analysis, the risk of developing OA remained lower in individuals treated with metformin compared with a sulfonylurea (aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65-0.90; P < .001) and the risk of joint replacement remained not statistically significant (aHR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.60-1.82; P = .89).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of individuals with diabetes, metformin treatment was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of developing OA compared with sulfonylurea treatment. These results further support preclinical and observational data that suggest metformin may have a protective association against the development of OA; future interventional studies with metformin for the treatment or prevention of OA should be considered.

Metformin use and associated risk of total joint replacement in patients with type 2 diabetes: a population-based matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

It is uncertain whether metformin use is associated with reduced risk of joint replacement in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We aimed to establish whether metformin use was associated with a reduced risk of total knee replacement (TKR) or total hip replacement (THR) among these patients.

METHODS

We selected patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus that was diagnosed between 2000 and 2012 from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. We used prescription time-distribution matching and propensity-score matching to balance potential confounders between metformin users and nonusers. We assessed the risks of TKR or THR using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

We included 20 347 participants who were not treated with metformin and 20 347 who were treated with metformin, for a total of 40 694 participants (mean age 63 yr, standard deviation 11 yr; 49.8% were women) after prescription time-distribution matching. Compared with participants who did not use metformin, those who used metformin had lower risks of TKR or THR (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.81 for TKR or THR; adjusted HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61-0.84 for TKR; adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.92 for THR) after adjustment for covariates. Propensity-score matching analyses (10 163 participants not treated with metformin v. 10 163 treated with metformin) and sensitivity analyses using inverse probability of treatment weighting and competing risk regression showed similar results.

INTERPRETATION

Metformin use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus was associated with a significantly reduced risk of total joint replacement. Randomized controlled clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis are warranted to determine whether metformin is effective in decreasing the need for joint replacement.