Comparison between two- and three-dimensional methods for offset measurements after total hip arthroplasty

Two- and three-dimensional measurements of leg length change using an accelerometer-based portable navigation system in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was examining the accuracy of accelerometer-based portable navigation systems (HipAlign) when measuring leg length changes using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) methods.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were patients ≥ 20 years old with symptomatic hip disease who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the supine position using HipAlign between June 2019 and April 2020. The exclusion criteria were patients who underwent THA via a posterior approach. We examined correlations between the leg length change measurement with HipAlign and either 2D or 3D measurement. We performed a multivariate analysis to determine which factors may have influenced the absolute error results.

RESULTS

This study included 34 patients. The absolute error in leg length change between the HipAlign and 3D measurement (4.0 mm) was greater than the HipAlign and 2D measurement (1.7 mm). There were positive correlations between leg length change with HipAlign and 2D and 3D measurements. Male patients had larger errors with 2D measurement. No significant factors were identified for 3D measurement.

CONCLUSION

HipAlign provided acceptable measurement accuracy for leg length changes.

Accuracy analysis of artificial intelligence-assisted three-dimensional preoperative planning in total hip replacement

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning technology in terms of predicting prosthesis size, acetabular cup positioning, and lowerlimb length restoration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2020 and July 2022, a total of 161 patients (101 males, 60 females; mean age: 57.6±10.5 years; range, 31 to 80 years) who underwent primary unilateral THA were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups as those who were treated with AI-assisted 3D preoperative planning technology (the observation group, n=95) and patients who were treated with traditional two-dimensional (2D) X-ray template planning technology (the control group, n=66).

RESULTS

The accuracy of the planning was based on the consistency of the preoperative planning and intraoperative models. The difference between the observation group and the control group was statistically significant in terms of the accuracy of the preoperative planning of acetabular prostheses (54% vs. 38%, p=0.048) and femoral prostheses (64% vs. 44%, p=0.011), with both values significantly higher in the observation group. The mean inclination angle, anteversion angle, and limb length discrepancy (LLD) in the observation group were 36.85°±4.82°, 12.10°±5.33°, and 2.18±2.70 mm, respectively, while those in the control group were 35.06°±6.07°, 10.95°±5.09°, and 4.42±3.85 mm, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of inclination angle and LLD (p<0.05 for both), but there was no significant difference in terms of anteversion angle (p>0.05). In the observation group, 86.3% (82/95) of acetabular cups were implanted within the Lewinnek safe zone (72.7% [48/66] in the control group), while 83.2% (79/95) were within the Callanan safe zone (69.7% [46/66] in the control group), with both values higher in the observation group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Overall, AI-assisted 3D preoperative planning is superior to traditional 2D X-ray template planning for predicting prosthesis size, and it also has the advantage in terms of acetabular cup positioning and lower-limb length restoration.

The association of postoperative global femoral offset with total hip arthroplasty outcomes

Global femoral offset (GFO) and femoral offset (FO) reportedly affect outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, FO assessed using plain radiography is affected by internal and external rotations of the hip joint. We investigated the relationship between leg length discrepancy and Harris hip score (HHS), and their influence on acetabular offset (AO), FO, GFO, anterior femoral offset, and outcomes after THA. We retrospectively evaluated 140 patients with hip osteoarthritis who underwent THA. A three-dimensional (3D) pelvis and femur model created from computed tomography (data using ZedHip software was used to investigate these parameters. The modified (m)HHS scores were significantly improved from 49.0 to 88.8 in total mHHS, 20.0-44.5 in pain, and 28.9-44.4 points in function. Significant correlations were found between the differences in AO, FO, GFO, and pain score in binominal, with maximum values of - 1.24, + 1.54, and + 0.90 mm/100 cm body height, respectively. The maximum value of GFO and mHHS in binominal was + 1.17 mm/100 cm body height (BH). The optimal range of difference of GFO was - 1.75 to 4.09 mm/100 cm BH. This is the first report using a 3D method for assessing FO. Preoperative planning using the system could improve postoperative function.

Minimum 10-Year Results of Modular Metal-On-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background: this study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of (a minimum of 10-years) total hip arthroplasty with a metal-on-metal acetabular prosthesis. Methods: Eighty-nine primary total hip arthroplasties (82 patients) were performed using a Pinnacle modular metal-on-metal acetabular prosthesis. Clinical hip function outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip score preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Radiological analysis was performed at the final follow-up and magnetic resonance imaging in all hips postoperatively. Results: Out of 82 patients, 17 were excluded who were followed up for <10 years. Of the remaining 65 patients (70 hips), 19 (20 hips) developed pseudotumors during 2−10 years postoperatively. After 10 and 13 years, the survival rates of revision endpoint were 93.6% and 90.4%, respectively. Clinical hip function outcomes had improved significantly at the final follow-up. In the radiological analysis, the mean cup angle of inclination and mean ratio of femoral offset on the operated hip to the contralateral hip was highest in patients with revision surgery for adverse reactions to metal debris. Conclusions: This study showed a 29.0% prevalence of pseudotumors. Some cases required revisions even after 10 years following surgery. Regular clinical surveillance is recommended for the early detection of adverse reactions to metal debris.