Quantitative action spectroscopy reveals ARPE19 sensitivity to ultraviolet radiation at 350 nm and 380 nm

Enhancing ocular protection against UVB: The role of irigenin in modulating oxidative stress and apoptotic pathways In Vivo

Oxidative damage contributes to age-related macular degeneration. Irigenin possesses diverse pharmacologic properties, including antioxidative and antiapoptotic effects. Our in vivo experiments indicated that irigenin mitigates UVB-induced histopathologic changes and oxidative DNA damage. Histologic analyses and TUNEL staining revealed that this compound dose-dependently ameliorated UVB-induced retinal damage and apoptosis. Furthermore, irigenin substantially reduced the level of 8-hydroxyguanosine, a biomarker of UVB-induced oxidative DNA damage. We further explored the molecular mechanisms that mediate the protective effects of irigenin. Our findings suggested that UVB-induced generation of ROS disrupts the stability of the mitochondrial membrane, activating intrinsic apoptotic pathways; the underlying mechanisms include the release of cytochrome c, activation of caspase-9 and caspase-3, and subsequent degradation of PARP-1. Notably, irigenin reversed mitochondrial disruption and apoptosis. It also modulated the Bax and Bcl-2 expression but influenced the mitochondrial apoptotic pathways. Our study highlights the role of the Nrf2 pathway in mitigating the effects of oxidative stress. We found that UVB exposure downregulated, but irigenin treatment upregulated the expression of Nrf2 and antioxidant enzymes. Therefore, irigenin activates the Nrf2 pathway to address oxidative stress. In conclusion, irigenin exhibits protective effects against UVB-induced ocular damage, evidenced by the diminution of histological alterations. It mitigates oxidative DNA damage and apoptosis in the retinal tissues by modulating the intrinsic apoptotic pathways and the AIF mechanisms. Furthermore, irigenin effectively reduces lipid peroxidation, enhancing the activity of antioxidant enzymes by stimulating the Nrf2 pathway. This protective mechanism underscores the potential benefit of irigenin in combating UVB-mediated ocular damage.

UVR and RPE - The Good, the Bad and the degenerate Macula

Ultraviolet Radiation (UVR) has a well-established causative influence within the aetiology of conditions of the skin and the anterior segment of the eye. However, a grounded assessment of the role of UVR within conditions of the retina has been hampered by a historical lack of quantitative, and spectrally resolved, assessment of how UVR impacts upon the retina in terms congruent with contemporary theories of ageing. In this review, we sought to summarise the key findings of research investigating the connection between UVR exposure in retinal cytopathology while identifying necessary avenues for future research which can deliver a deeper understanding of UVR's place within the retinal risk landscape.

Non-lethal exposure to short-wavelength light-emitting diodes modulates tight-junction structure in human corneal epithelial cells via cAMP-dependent signaling

Light-emitting diodes (LED)-derived lights have been widely used as a medical treatment in photobiomodulation (PBM). However, the PBM effects in ophthalmology are less well investigated. Herein, we explored the effect of LED-generated light on the tight-junction (TJ) formation in human corneal epithelial cells (HCEs). The HCEs were separately exposed to monochromatic LEDs at wavelengths of 365 nm (UVA), 420 nm (violet), 470 nm (blue), 530 nm (green), 590 nm (amber), 660 nm (deep red), and 740 nm (far red) at 10 J/cm2/day for 1 and 2 days. Long-term cultivation of HCEs without LED exposure for up to 14 days was established as a control. The effects of both LED wavelength and culture duration on cell morphology, cAMP-regulated proteins, TJ-associated proteins, and cell growth-associated proteins were also analyzed. Together with the increase in cell number during prolonged cultivation, cAMP, ZO-1, ZO-2, CLDN1, and CLDN4 all increased significantly during long-term cultivation without LED exposure. There was no difference in HCE viability after exposure to all monochromatic LEDs at an accumulated dose of 20 J/cm2. As determined by immunoblotting, UVA, violet, and blue light increased intracellular cAMP, ZO-1, ZO-2, CLDN1, and CLDN4 expression, respectively. UVA and violet, but not blue, light increased PKAreg-pS77 expression. However, none of the other treatments changed the expression of PKAcat-pT197, VASP-pS157, Bax, Bcl-2, or Bcl-xL. Immunofluorescence staining confirmed the formation of TJ structures. The expressions of ZO-1, ZO-2, CLDN1, and CLDN4 as well as TJ structures 2 days following UVA, violet, and blue exposure were similar to those of control cells after 9 days of cultivation. We conclude that short-wavelength LEDs at non-lethal exposure intensities accelerated the formation of TJ structure in HCEs via a cAMP-dependent regulatory cascade.