Transcriptome-guided annotation and functional classification of long non-coding RNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana

The role of long noncoding RNAs in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with a poor prognosis leading to death. The diagnosis and treatment of ALS are inherently challenging due to its complex pathomechanism. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides involved in different cellular processes, incisively gene expression. In recent years, more studies have been conducted on lncRNA classes and interference in different disease pathologies, showing their promising contribution to diagnosing and treating neurodegenerative diseases. In this review, we discussed the role of lncRNAs like NEAT1 and C9orf72-as in ALS pathogenesis mechanisms caused by mutations in different genes, including TAR DNA-binding protein-43 (TDP-43), fused in sarcoma (FUS), superoxide dismutase type 1 (SOD1). NEAT1 is a well-established lncRNA in ALS pathogenesis; hence, we elaborate on its involvement in forming paraspeckles, stress response, inflammatory response, and apoptosis. Furthermore, antisense lncRNAs (as-lncRNAs), a key group of transcripts from the opposite strand of genes, including ZEB1-AS1 and ATXN2-AS, are discussed as newly identified components in the pathology of ALS. Ultimately, we review the current standing of using lncRNAs as biomarkers and therapeutic agents and the future vision of further studies on lncRNA applications.

Population-level annotation of lncRNAs in Arabidopsis reveals extensive expression variation associated with transposable element-like silencing

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are understudied and underannotated in plants. In mammals, lncRNA loci are nearly as ubiquitous as protein-coding genes, and their expression is highly variable between individuals of the same species. Using Arabidopsis thaliana as a model, we aimed to elucidate the true scope of lncRNA transcription across plants from different regions and study its natural variation. We used transcriptome deep sequencing data sets spanning hundreds of natural accessions and several developmental stages to create a population-wide annotation of lncRNAs, revealing thousands of previously unannotated lncRNA loci. While lncRNA transcription is ubiquitous in the genome, most loci appear to be actively silenced and their expression is extremely variable between natural accessions. This high expression variability is largely caused by the high variability of repressive chromatin levels at lncRNA loci. High variability was particularly common for intergenic lncRNAs (lincRNAs), where pieces of transposable elements (TEs) present in 50% of these lincRNA loci are associated with increased silencing and variation, and such lncRNAs tend to be targeted by the TE silencing machinery. We created a population-wide lncRNA annotation in Arabidopsis and improve our understanding of plant lncRNA genome biology, raising fundamental questions about what causes transcription and silencing across the genome.

Transcription factors KANADI 1, MYB DOMAIN PROTEIN 44, and PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 4 regulate long intergenic noncoding RNAs expressed in Arabidopsis roots

Thousands of long intergenic noncoding RNAs (lincRNAs) have been identified in plant genomes. While some lincRNAs have been characterized as important regulators in different biological processes, little is known about the transcriptional regulation for most plant lincRNAs. Through the integration of 8 annotation resources, we defined 6,599 high-confidence lincRNA loci in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). For lincRNAs belonging to different evolutionary age categories, we identified major differences in sequence and chromatin features, as well as in the level of conservation and purifying selection acting during evolution. Spatiotemporal gene expression profiles combined with transcription factor (TF) chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) data were used to construct a TF-lincRNA regulatory network containing 2,659 lincRNAs and 15,686 interactions. We found that properties characterizing lincRNA expression, conservation, and regulation differ between plants and animals. Experimental validation confirmed the role of 3 TFs, KANADI 1, MYB DOMAIN PROTEIN 44, and PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 4, as key regulators controlling root-specific lincRNA expression, demonstrating the predictive power of our network. Furthermore, we identified 58 lincRNAs, regulated by these TFs, showing strong root cell type-specific expression or chromatin accessibility, which are linked with genome-wide association studies genetic associations related to root system development and growth. The multilevel genome-wide characterization covering chromatin state information, promoter conservation, and chromatin immunoprecipitation-based TF binding, for all detectable lincRNAs across 769 expression samples, permits rapidly defining the biological context and relevance of Arabidopsis lincRNAs through regulatory networks.

Targeting long non-coding RNA MALAT1 reverses cancerous phenotypes of breast cancer cells through microRNA-561-3p/TOP2A axis

Non-coding RNAs, including Inc-RNA and miRNA, have been reported to regulate gene expression and are associated with cancer progression. MicroRNA-561-3p (miR-561-3p), as a tumor suppressor, has been reported to play a role in preventing cancer cell progression, and MALAT1 (Lnc-RNA) have also been demonstrated to promote malignancy in various cancers, such as breast cancer (BC). In this study, we aimed to determine the correlation between miR-561-3p and MALAT1 and their roles in breast cancer progression. The expression of MALAT1, mir-561-3p, and topoisomerase alpha 2 (TOP2A) as a target of miR-561-3p was determined in BC clinical samples and cell lines via qRT-PCR. The binding site between MALAT1, miR-561-3p, and TOP2A was investigated by performing the dual luciferase reporter assay. MALAT1 was knocked down by siRNA, and cell proliferation, apoptotic assays, and cell cycle arrest were evaluated. MALAT1 and TOP2A were significantly upregulated, while mir-561-3p expression was downregulated in BC samples and cell lines. MALAT1 knockdown significantly increased miR-561-3p expression, which was meaningfully inverted by co-transfection with the miR 561-3p inhibitor. Furthermore, the knockdown of MALAT1 by siRNA inhibited proliferation, induced apoptosis, and arrested the cell cycle at the G1 phase in BC cells. Notably, the mechanistic investigation revealed that MALAT1 predominantly acted as a competing endogenous RNA in BC by regulating the miR-561-3p/TOP2A axis. Based on our results, MALAT1 upregulation in BC may function as a tumor promoter in BC via directly sponging miRNA 561-3p, and MALAT1 knockdown serves a vital antitumor role in BC cell progression through the miR-561-3p/TOP2A axis.

Long Non-Coding RNAs of Plants in Response to Abiotic Stresses and Their Regulating Roles in Promoting Environmental Adaption

Abiotic stresses triggered by climate change and human activity cause substantial agricultural and environmental problems which hamper plant growth. Plants have evolved sophisticated mechanisms in response to abiotic stresses, such as stress perception, epigenetic modification, and regulation of transcription and translation. Over the past decade, a large body of literature has revealed the various regulatory roles of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in the plant response to abiotic stresses and their irreplaceable functions in environmental adaptation. LncRNAs are recognized as a class of ncRNAs that are longer than 200 nucleotides, influencing a variety of biological processes. In this review, we mainly focused on the recent progress of plant lncRNAs, outlining their features, evolution, and functions of plant lncRNAs in response to drought, low or high temperature, salt, and heavy metal stress. The approaches to characterize the function of lncRNAs and the mechanisms of how they regulate plant responses to abiotic stresses were further reviewed. Moreover, we discuss the accumulating discoveries regarding the biological functions of lncRNAs on plant stress memory as well. The present review provides updated information and directions for us to characterize the potential functions of lncRNAs in abiotic stresses in the future.