Blood pressure variability and plasma Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in older adults

Amyloid-β and Phosphorylated Tau are the Key Biomarkers and Predictors of Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a age-related neurodegenerative disease and is a major public health concern both in Texas, US and Worldwide. This neurodegenerative disease is mainly characterized by amyloid-beta (Aβ) and phosphorylated Tau (p-Tau) accumulation in the brains of patients with AD and increasing evidence suggests that these are key biomarkers in AD. Both Aβ and p-tau can be detected through various imaging techniques (such as positron emission tomography, PET) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. The presence of these biomarkers in individuals, who are asymptomatic or have mild cognitive impairment can indicate an increased risk of developing AD in the future. Furthermore, the combination of Aβ and p-tau biomarkers is often used for more accurate diagnosis and prediction of AD progression. Along with AD being a neurodegenerative disease, it is associated with other chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease, obesity, depression, and diabetes because studies have shown that these comorbid conditions make people more vulnerable to AD. In the first part of this review, we discuss that biofluid-based biomarkers such as Aβ, p-Tau in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and Aβ & p-Tau in plasma could be used as an alternative sensitive technique to diagnose AD. In the second part, we discuss the underlying molecular mechanisms of chronic conditions linked with AD and how they affect the patients in clinical care.

Short-term blood pressure variability and brain functional network connectivity in older adults

Background

Blood pressure variability is increasingly linked with cerebrovascular disease and Alzheimer's disease, independent of mean blood pressure levels. Elevated blood pressure variability is also associated with attenuated cerebrovascular reactivity, which may have implications for functional hyperemia underpinning brain network connectivity. It remains unclear whether blood pressure variability is related to functional network connectivity. We examined relationships between beat-to-beat blood pressure variability and functional connectivity in brain networks vulnerable to aging and Alzheimer's disease.

Methods

53 community-dwelling older adults (mean [SD] age = 69.9 [7.5] years, 62.3% female) without history of dementia or clinical stroke underwent continuous blood pressure monitoring and resting state fMRI scan. Blood pressure variability was calculated as variability independent of mean. Functional connectivity was determined by resting state fMRI for several brain networks: default, salience, dorsal attention, fronto-parietal, and language. Multiple linear regression examined relationships between short-term blood pressure variability and functional network connectivity.

Results

Elevated short-term blood pressure variability was associated with lower functional connectivity in the default network (systolic: standardized ß = -0.30 [95% CI -0.59, -0.01], p = .04). There were no significant associations between blood pressure variability and connectivity in other functional networks or between mean blood pressure and functional connectivity in any network.

Discussion

Older adults with elevated short-term blood pressure variability exhibit lower resting state functional connectivity in the default network. Findings support the role of blood pressure variability in neurovascular dysfunction and Alzheimer's disease. Blood pressure variability may represent an understudied early vascular risk factor for neurovascular dysfunction relevant to Alzheimer's disease, with potential therapeutic implications.

Blood Pressure Variability and Plasma Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers in the SPRINT Trial

Background

Recent observational studies suggest higher blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) is associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers amyloid-beta (Aβ) and tau. Less is known about relationships in interventional cohorts with strictly controlled mean BP levels.

Objective

Investigate the longitudinal relationship between BPV and change in plasma AD biomarkers under standard versus intensive BP treatment.

Methods

In this post hoc analysis of the SPRINT trial, 457 participants (n = 206 in standard group, n = 251 in intensive group) underwent repeated BP measurement between baseline and 12-months follow-up, and venipuncture at baseline and median (IQR) 3.5 (3.0-4.0) years later to determine plasma AD biomarkers total tau and Aβ1-42:Aβ1-40 ratio. BPV was calculated as tertiles of variability independent of mean. Linear mixed models investigated the effect of BPV×time on AD biomarker levels.

Results

Higher BPV was associated with increased levels of total tau in the standard group (β [95% CI] 1st versus 3rd tertiles of BPV: 0.21 [0.02, 0.41], p = 0.035), but not in the intensive group (β [95% CI] 1st versus 3rd tertiles of BPV: -0.02 [-0.19, 0.16], p = 0.843). BPV was not associated with Aβ 1-42:Aβ 1-40 ratio in either group. Mean BP was not associated with biomarkers.

Conclusions

Higher BPV was associated with increased plasma total tau under standard BP treatment. Findings add new evidence to prior observational work linking BPV to AD pathophysiology and suggest that, despite strict control of mean BP, BPV remains a risk for pathophysiological change underlying risk for AD.

Blood Pressure Variability and Plasma Biomarkers of Neuronal Injury and Alzheimer's Disease: A Clinic-Based Study of Patients with Diseases Along the Heart-Brain Axis

 Higher blood pressure variability (BPV) predisposes to cognitive decline. To investigate underlying mechanisms, we measured 24-h ambulatory BPV, nocturnal dipping and orthostatic hypotension in 518 participants with vascular cognitive impairment, carotid occlusive disease, heart failure, or reference participants. We determined cross-sectional associations between BPV indices and plasma biomarkers of neuronal injury (neurofilament light chain) and Alzheimer's disease (phosphorylated-tau-181 and Aβ42/Aβ40). None of the BPV indices were significantly associated with any of the biomarkers. Hence, in patients with diseases along the heart-brain axis, we found no evidence for an association between BPV and selected markers of neuronal injury or Alzheimer's disease.

24-Hour Blood Pressure Variability Via Ambulatory Monitoring and Risk for Probable Dementia in the SPRINT Trial

BACKGROUND

Blood pressure variability is an emerging risk factor for dementia, independent and oftentimes beyond mean blood pressure levels. Recent evidence from interventional cohorts with rigorously controlled mean blood pressure levels suggest blood pressure variability over months to years remains a risk for dementia, but no prior studies have investigated relationships with blood pressure variability over shorter time periods.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the potential effect of ambulatory blood pressure variability on the rate of cognitive outcomes under intensive vs standard blood pressure lowering.

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of the randomized, controlled, open-label Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial clinical trial.

SETTING

Multisite Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.

PARTICIPANTS

793 participants at increased risk for cardiovascular disease and without history of dementia at study randomization.

INTERVENTION

Standard (<140 mmHg systolic blood pressure target) vs intensive (<120 mmHg systolic blood pressure target) lowering of mean blood pressure.

MEASUREMENTS

24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 27 months after treatment randomization (standard vs intensive) and follow-up cognitive testing. Intraindividual blood pressure variability was calculated as the average real variability over 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime periods. Participants were categorized into 3 adjudicated clinical outcomes: no cognitive impairment, mild cognitive impairment, probable dementia. Cox proportional hazards models examined the potential effect of ambulatory blood pressure variability on the rate of cognitive outcomes under intensive vs standard blood pressure lowering. Associations with mean blood pressure were also explored.

RESULTS

Higher systolic 24-hour blood pressure variability was associated with increased risk for probable dementia in the standard group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.56 [95% CI 1.16, 5.62], p = 0.019) but not in the intensive group (HR: 0.54 [95% CI 0.24, 1.23], p = 0.141). Similar findings were observed with daytime systolic blood pressure variability but not nighttime blood pressure variability. Mean blood pressure was not associated with cognitive outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher systolic 24-hour and daytime blood pressure variability via ambulatory monitoring is associated with risk for dementia under standard blood pressure treatment. Findings support prior evidence that blood pressure variability remains a risk for dementia despite strict control of mean blood pressure levels.

Blood pressure variability, central autonomic network dysfunction and cerebral small vessel disease in APOE4 carriers

Background

Increased blood pressure variability (BPV) is a risk factor for cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) and neurodegeneration, independent of age and average blood pressure, particularly in apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) carriers. However, it remains uncertain whether BPV elevation is a cause or a consequence of vascular brain injury, or to what degree injury to the central autonomic network (CAN) may contribute to BPV-associated risk in APOE4 carriers.

Methods

Independently living older adults (n=70) with no history of stroke or dementia were recruited from the community and underwent 5 minutes of resting beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring, genetic testing, and brain MRI. Resting BPV, APOE genotype, CSVD burden on brain MRI, and resting state CAN connectivity by fMRI were analyzed. Causal mediation and moderation analysis evaluated BPV and CAN effects on CSVD in APOE4 carriers (n=37) and non-carriers (n=33).

Results

Higher BPV was associated with the presence and extent of CSVD in APOE4 carriers, but not non-carriers, independent of CAN connectivity (B= 18.92, P= .02), and CAN connectivity did not mediate the relationship between BPV and CSVD. In APOE4 carriers, CAN connectivity moderated the relationship between BPV and CSVD, whereby BPV effects on CSVD were greater in those with lower CAN connectivity (B= 36.43, P= .02).

Conclusions

Older APOE4 carriers with higher beat-to-beat BPV exhibit more extensive CSVD, independent of average blood pressure, and the strength of CAN connectivity does not mediate these effects. Findings suggest increased BPV is more likely a cause, not a consequence, of CSVD. BPV is more strongly associated with CSVD in APOE4 carriers with lower rsCAN connectivity, suggesting CAN dysfunction and BPV elevation may have synergistic effects on CSVD. Further studies are warranted to understand the interplay between BPV and CAN function in APOE4 carriers.

Long-term blood pressure patterns in midlife and dementia in later life: Findings from the Framingham Heart Study

INTRODUCTION

Long-term blood pressure (BP) measures, such as visit-to-visit BP variability (BPV) and cumulative BP, are strong indicators of cardiovascular risks. This study modeled up to 20 years of BP patterns representative of midlife by using BPV and cumulative BP, then examined their associations with development of dementia in later life.

METHODS

For 3201 individuals from the Framingham Heart Study, multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between long-term BP patterns during midlife and the development of dementia (ages ≥ 65).

RESULTS

After adjusting for covariates, every quartile increase in midlife cumulative BP was associated with a sequential increase in the risk of developing dementia (e.g., highest quartile of cumulative systolic blood pressure had approximately 2.5-fold increased risk of all-cause dementia). BPV was not significantly associated with dementia.

DISCUSSION

Findings suggest that cumulative BP over the course of midlife predicts risk of dementia in later life. HIGHLIGHTS Long-term blood pressure (BP) patterns are strong indicators of vascular risks. Cumulative BP and BP variability (BPV) were used to reflect BP patterns across midlife. High cumulative BP in midlife is associated with increased dementia risk. Visit-to-visit BPV was not associated with the onset of dementia.