A scoping review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of pan-tumour biomarkers (dMMR, MSI, high TMB) in different solid tumours

Randomized, open-label, phase 2 study of nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors of high tumor mutational burden

BACKGROUND

Checkpoint inhibitor therapy has demonstrated overall survival benefit in multiple tumor types. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a predictive biomarker for response to immunotherapies. This study evaluated the efficacy of nivolumab+ipilimumab in multiple tumor types based on TMB status evaluated using either tumor tissue (tTMB) or circulating tumor DNA in the blood (bTMB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors with high (≥10 mutations per megabase) tTMB (tTMB-H) and/or bTMB (bTMB-H) who were refractory to standard therapies were randomized 2:1 to receive nivolumab+ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy in an open-label, phase 2 study (CheckMate 848; NCT03668119). tTMB and bTMB were determined by the Foundation Medicine FoundationOne® CDx test and bTMB Clinical Trial Assay, respectively. The dual primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) in patients with tTMB-H and/or bTMB-H tumors treated with nivolumab+ipilimumab.

RESULTS

In total, 201 patients refractory to standard therapies were randomized: 135 had tTMB-H and 125 had bTMB-H; 82 patients had dual tTMB-H/bTMB-H. In patients with tTMB-H, ORR was 38.6% (95% CI 28.4% to 49.6%) with nivolumab+ipilimumab and 29.8% (95% CI 17.3% to 44.9%) with nivolumab monotherapy. In patients with bTMB-H, ORR was 22.5% (95% CI 13.9% to 33.2%) with nivolumab+ipilimumab and 15.6% (95% CI 6.5% to 29.5%) with nivolumab monotherapy. Early and durable responses to treatment with nivolumab+ipilimumab were seen in patients with tTMB-H or bTMB-H. The safety profile of nivolumab+ipilimumab was manageable, with no new safety signals.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors with TMB-H, as determined by tissue biopsy or by blood sample when tissue biopsy is unavailable, who have no other treatment options, may benefit from nivolumab+ipilimumab.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03668119.

Failure of immune checkpoint inhibitors for microsatellite instability-positive pancreatic adenocarcinoma with atypical pattern of short tandem repeat mutation

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is an important biomarker in cancer. While routine methods can detect MSI in certain tumor types, in other tumor types the results may be incorrect due to differences in the MSI loci pattern. Here, we report the case of a patient with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with confirmed MSI by two independent next-generation sequencing tests, but not by routine methods, who had progression on pembrolizumab. Comparison of the patient's MSI loci patterns with MSI+ colorectal adenocarcinoma samples showed a lower fraction of unstable loci, low resolution of a second peak in the repeat length spectrum of unstable short tandem repeats in the patient's sample, and a lower length of indels (3.7 vs 4.5 base pairs, p < 0.01).

PD-L1 expression and its correlation with tumor biomarkers in Chinese urothelial bladder cancer

Data on prevalence of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and its correlation with tumor biomarkers in Chinese patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (MIUBC) are scarce. We investigated the prevalence of PD-L1 expression, PD-L1 expression in tumor cells (TC) and immune cells (IC), and its correlation with tumor biomarkers (CD8+ T cells and tumor mutation burden [TMB]) in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed MIUBC (NCT03433924). Of 248 patients enrolled, 229 with PD-L1 data available were analysed. High PD-L1 expression (≥ 25% of TC or IC with PD-L1 expression) was observed in 120 (52.4%) patients. 59 cases showed positive staining in ≥ 25% of TC, and 82 cases had positive staining in ≥ 25% of IC. High expression of CD8+ T cell and TMB (> 10 mutations/megabase) was observed in 44.5% and 54.1% patients, respectively. A positive correlation was observed between percentage of TC with membrane PD-L1 positivity and CD8+ T cells (0.34; P < 0.001) and between IC with membrane PD-L1 positivity and CD8+ T cells (0.44; P < 0.001). There is high prevalence of PD-L1 expression in Chinese patients with MIUBC, suggesting that a sizable subset of patients could benefit from immunotherapy. The correlation of PD-L1 expression with tumor biomarkers provide clues for mechanisms underlying the effects of biomarkers for predicting efficacy.

Biomarker development for PD-(L)1 axis inhibition: a consensus view from the SITC Biomarkers Committee

Therapies targeting the programmed cell death protein-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (abbreviated as PD-(L)1) axis are a significant advancement in the treatment of many tumor types. However, many patients receiving these agents fail to respond or have an initial response followed by cancer progression. For these patients, while subsequent immunotherapies that either target a different axis of immune biology or non-immune combination therapies are reasonable treatment options, the lack of predictive biomarkers to follow-on agents is impeding progress in the field. This review summarizes the current knowledge of mechanisms driving resistance to PD-(L)1 therapies, the state of biomarker development along this axis, and inherent challenges in future biomarker development for these immunotherapies. Innovation in the development and application of novel biomarkers and patient selection strategies for PD-(L)1 agents is required to accelerate the delivery of effective treatments to the patients most likely to respond.

Establishing a model composed of immune-related gene-modules to predict tumor immunotherapy response

At present, tumor immunotherapy has been widely applied to treat various cancers. However, the accuracy of predicting treatment efficacy has not yet achieved a significant breakthrough. This study aimed to construct a prediction model based on the modified WGCNA algorithm to precisely judge the anti-tumor immune response. First, we used a murine colon cancer model to screen corresponding DEGs according to different groups. GSEA was used to analyze the potential mechanisms of the immune-related DEGs (irDEGs) in each group. Subsequently, the intersection of the irDEGs in every group was acquired, and 7 gene-modules were mapped. Finally, 4 gene-modules including cogenes, antiPD-1 immu-genes, chemo immu-genes and comb immu-genes, were selected for subsequent study. Furthermore, a clinical dataset of gastric cancer patients receiving immunotherapy was enrolled, and the irDEGs were identified. A total of 34 vital irDEGs were obtained from the intersections of the vital irDEGs and the four gene-modules. Next, the vital irDEGs were analyzed by the modified WGCNA algorithm, and the correlation coefficients between the 4 gene-modules and the response status to immunotherapy were calculated. Thus, a prediction model based on correlation coefficients was built, and the corresponding model scores were acquired. The AUC calculated according to the model score was 0.727, which was non-inferior to that of the ESTIMATE score and the TIDE score. Meanwhile, the AUC calculated according to the classification of the model scores was 0.705, which was non-inferior to that of the ESTIMATE classification and the TIDE classification. The prediction accuracy of the model was validated in clinical datasets of other cancers.

Extent of investigation and management of cases of 'unexplained' mismatch repair deficiency (u-dMMR): a UK Cancer Genetics Group consensus

BACKGROUND

Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a characteristic feature of cancers linked to Lynch syndrome. However, in most cases, it results from sporadic somatic events rather than hereditary factors. The term 'Lynch-like syndrome' (LLS) has been used to guide colorectal cancer surveillance for relatives of individuals with a dMMR tumour when somatic and germline genomic testing is uninformative. As the assessment of mismatch repair through immunohistochemistry and/or microsatellite instability is increasingly applied across various tumour types for treatment planning, dMMR is increasingly detected in tumours where suspicion of hereditary aetiology is low. Our objective was to establish current practices and develop national guidance for investigating, and managing relatives of, patients with cancers demonstrating unexplained dMMR.

METHODS

This was achieved through a virtual consensus meeting involving key stakeholders from the UK, through premeeting surveys, structured discussions and in-meeting polling to formulate best practice guidance.

RESULTS

We identified variability in the availability of diagnostic technologies across specialist centres. It was agreed that equitable access to baseline testing is required, acknowledging the need for a pragmatic approach to investigating dMMR cancers not traditionally associated with Lynch syndrome. Factors such as family history, age, tumour type, protein loss pattern and extent of the investigation were deemed crucial in guiding family management. The term 'unexplained dMMR' was recommended over LLS.

CONCLUSION

Decisions regarding investigations and future cancer risk management in patients and relatives should be nuanced, considering factors like clinical suspicion of hereditary predisposition to allocate limited resources efficiently and avoid unnecessary investigations in low-suspicion families.

Mutational variant allele frequency profile as a biomarker of response to immune checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Identifying new biomarkers for predicting immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crucial. We aimed to assess the variant allele frequency (VAF)-related profile as a novel biomarker for NSCLC personalized therapy.

METHODS

We utilized genomic data of 915 NSCLC patients via cBioPortal and a local cohort of 23 patients for model construction and mutational analysis. Genomic, transcriptomic data from 952 TCGA NSCLC patients, and immunofluorescence (IF) assessment with the local cohort supported mechanism analysis.

RESULTS

Utilizing the random forest algorithm, a 15-gene VAF-related model was established, differentiating patients with durable clinical benefit (DCB) from no durable benefit (NDB). The model demonstrated robust performance, with ROC-AUC values of 0.905, 0.737, and 0.711 across training (n = 313), internal validation (n = 133), and external validation (n = 157) cohorts. Stratification by the model into high- and low-score groups correlated significantly with both progression-free survival (PFS) (training: P < 0.0001, internal validation: P < 0.0001, external validation: P = 0.0066) and overall survival (OS) (n = 341) (P < 0.0001). Notably, the stratification system was independent of PD-L1 (P < 0.0001) and TMB (P < 0.0001). High-score patients exhibited an increased DCB ratio and longer PFS across both PD-L1 and TMB subgroups. Additionally, the high-score group appeared influenced by tobacco exposure, with activated DNA damage response pathways. Whereas, immune/inflammation-related pathways were enriched in the low-score group. Tumor immune microenvironment analyses revealed higher proportions of exhausted/effector memory CD8 + T cells in the high-score group.

CONCLUSIONS

The mutational VAF profile is a promising biomarker for ICI therapy in NSCLC, with enhanced therapeutic stratification and management as a supplement to PD-L1 or TMB.

Real-world prevalence of microsatellite instability testing and related status in women with advanced endometrial cancer in Europe

PURPOSE

To assess the real-world prevalence of microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair (MMR) testing and related tumor status in recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer patients in Europe.

METHODS

Data were from two multi-center, retrospective patient chart review studies conducted in the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, France and Spain: The Endometrial Cancer Health Outcomes-Europe-First-Line (ECHO-EU-1L) study and the ECHO-EU-Second-Line (ECHO-EU-2L) study. ECHO-EU-1L included recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer patients who received first-line systemic therapy between 1/JUN/2016 and 31/MAR/2020 after recurrent/advanced diagnosis. ECHO-EU-2L included patients with recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer who progressed between 1/JUN/2016 and 30/JUN/2019 following prior first-line systemic therapy. Data collected included patient demographics, MSI/MMR tumor testing and results, and clinical/treatment characteristics.

RESULTS

ECHO-EU-1L included 242 first-line patients and ECHO-EU-2L included 475 s-line patients. For all patients, median age at recurrent/advanced diagnosis was 69 years, roughly half had endometrioid carcinoma histology and over 75% had Stage IIIB-IV disease at initial diagnosis. The prevalence of MSI/MMR testing in the first-line and second-line cohorts was similar (36.4 and 34.9%, respectively). Among those tested, a majority had non-MSI-high/MMR proficient tumors (80.7 and 74.7% among first- and second-line patients, respectively). About 15% had MSI-high/MMR deficient tumors in both cohorts, and a few patients had discordant results (3.4 and 10.8% among first- and second-line patients, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Prior to the approvals of biomarker-directed therapies for recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer patients in Europe, there were low MSI/MMR testing rates for these patients of just over one-third. Given the availability of biomarker-directed therapies, increased MSI/MMR testing may help inform treatment decisions for recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer patients in Europe.

Nationwide Real-World Data of Microsatellite Instability and/or Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Cancer: Prevalence and Testing Patterns

Determination of microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair (MMR) status in cancer has several clinical implications. Our aim was to integrate MSI/MMR status from patients tested in Greece to assess the prevalence of MSI-high (MSI-H)/deficient MMR (dMMR) per tumor type, testing patterns over time and concordance between MSI and MMR status. We retrospectively recorded MSI/MMR testing data of patients with diverse tumor types performed in pathology and molecular diagnostics laboratories across Greece. Overall, 18 of 22 pathology and/or molecular diagnostics laboratories accepted our invitation to participate. In the 18 laboratories located across the country, 7916 tumor samples were evaluated for MSI/MMR status. MSI/MMR testing significantly increased in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and other tumor types overtime (p < 0.05). The highest prevalence was reported in endometrial cancer (47 of 225 patients, 20.9%). MSI-H/dMMR was observed in most tumor types, even in low proportions. Among 904 tumors assessed both for MSI and MMR status, 21 had discordant results (overall discordance rate, 2.3%). We reported MSI-H/dMMR prevalence rates in patients with diverse cancers, while demonstrating increasing referral patterns from medical oncologists in the country overtime. The anticipated high rate of concordance between MSI and MMR status in paired analysis was confirmed.

Microsatellite instability and mismatch repair protein deficiency: equal predictive markers?

Current clinical guidelines recommend mismatch repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) or molecular microsatellite instability (MSI) tests as predictive markers of immunotherapies. Most of the pathological guidelines consider MMR protein IHC as the gold standard test to identify cancers with MMR deficiency and recommend molecular MSI tests only in special circumstances or to screen for Lynch syndrome. However, there are data in the literature which suggest that the two test types may not be equal. For example, molecular epidemiology studies reported different rates of deficient MMR (dMMR) and MSI in various cancer types. Additionally, direct comparisons of the two tests revealed relatively frequent discrepancies between MMR IHC and MSI tests, especially in non-colorectal and non-endometrial cancers and in cases with unusual dMMR phenotypes. There are also scattered clinical data showing that the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is different if the patient selection was based on dMMR versus MSI status of the cancers. All these observations question the current dogma that dMMR phenotype and genetic MSI status are equal predictive markers of the immunotherapies.

Tissue-Agnostic Cancer Therapy Approvals

Tumor-agnostic, or histology-agnostic, cancer therapy marks a groundbreaking evolution in the realm of precision oncology. In stark contrast to conventional cancer treatments that categorize malignancies based on their tissue of origin (eg, breast, lung, renal cell, etc), tumor-agnostic therapies transcend histologic boundaries, honing in on the genetic and molecular attributes of tumors, regardless of their location. This article offers a comprehensive review of the current landscape of tissue-agnostic cancer therapies and provides clinical insights to empower surgical oncologists with a deeper understanding of these innovative therapeutic approaches.

Evaluation of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) Samples from Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer for Whole Genome, Whole Exome and Comprehensive Panel Sequencing

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is often the only source of tumor tissue from patients with advanced, inoperable lung cancer. EBUS-TBNA aspirates are used for the diagnosis, staging, and genomic testing to inform therapy options. Here we extracted DNA and RNA from 220 EBUS-TBNA aspirates to evaluate their suitability for whole genome (WGS), whole exome (WES), and comprehensive panel sequencing. For a subset of 40 cases, the same nucleic acid extraction was sequenced using WGS, WES, and the TruSight Oncology 500 assay. Genomic features were compared between sequencing platforms and compared with those reported by clinical testing. A total of 204 aspirates (92.7%) had sufficient DNA (100 ng) for comprehensive panel sequencing, and 109 aspirates (49.5%) had sufficient material for WGS. Comprehensive sequencing platforms detected all seven clinically reported tier 1 actionable mutations, an additional three (7%) tier 1 mutations, six (15%) tier 2-3 mutations, and biomarkers of potential immunotherapy benefit (tumor mutation burden and microsatellite instability). As expected, WGS was more suited for the detection and discovery of emerging novel biomarkers of treatment response. WGS could be performed in half of all EBUS-TBNA aspirates, which points to the enormous potential of EBUS-TBNA as source material for large, well-curated discovery-based studies for novel and more effective predictors of treatment response. Comprehensive panel sequencing is possible in the vast majority of fresh EBUS-TBNA aspirates and enhances the detection of actionable mutations over current clinical testing.

Challenges and Future Directions in the Management of Tumor Mutational Burden-High (TMB-H) Advanced Solid Malignancies

A standardized assessment of Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) poses challenges across diverse tumor histologies, treatment modalities, and testing platforms, requiring careful consideration to ensure consistency and reproducibility. Despite clinical trials demonstrating favorable responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), not all patients with elevated TMB exhibit benefits, and certain tumors with a normal TMB may respond to ICIs. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the intricate interplay between TMB and the tumor microenvironment, as well as genomic features, is crucial to refine its predictive value. Bioinformatics advancements hold potential to improve the precision and cost-effectiveness of TMB assessments, addressing existing challenges. Similarly, integrating TMB with other biomarkers and employing comprehensive, multiomics approaches could further enhance its predictive value. Ongoing collaborative endeavors in research, standardization, and clinical validation are pivotal in harnessing the full potential of TMB as a biomarker in the clinic settings.

Colorectal Cancer Immunotherapy: State of the Art and Future Directions

Cancer immunotherapy has become an indispensable mode of treatment for a multitude of solid tumor cancers. Colorectal cancer (CRC) has been one of the many cancer types to benefit from immunotherapy, especially in advanced disease where standard treatment fails to prevent recurrence or results in poor survival. The efficacy of immunotherapy in CRC has not been without challenge, as early clinical trials observed dismal responses in unselected CRC patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors. Many studies and clinical trials have since refined immunotherapies available for CRC, solidifying immunotherapy as a powerful asset for CRC treatment. This review article examines CRC immunotherapies, from their foundation, through emerging avenues for improvement, to future directions.

FDA Approvals of Oncology Drugs for Tissue-Agnostic Indications

BACKGROUND

The development of molecularly targeted oncology drugs for tissue-agnostic indications represents a new paradigm, but marketing authorization may carry additional risks due to uncertainties about extrapolating drug safety and efficacy, and biomarker test accuracy, to unstudied tumor types.

OBJECTIVE

To determine tumor types represented and method of mutation identification in trials supporting the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of tissue-agnostic drugs, and to describe post-marketing requirements and commitments (PMRs/PMCs) issued for studies to evaluate additional tumor types and to validate companion diagnostic devices.

METHODS

For each tissue-agnostic drug approval identified via the FDA's Hematology/Oncology Approvals and Safety Notifications website, prescribing information, approval packages, and letters were retrieved from the Drugs@FDA website. Characteristics of approvals, details of supporting trials, and PMRs/PMCs for clinical trials and diagnostic tests were extracted.

RESULTS

Six drugs were approved for seven tissue-agnostic indications between 2017 and 2022, with 9-15 different tumor types represented in trials supporting approvals. Only one approval prospectively utilized a commercial assay to identify the molecular alteration of interest in tumor samples. All seven approvals were issued PMRs for trials with additional tumor types, and six of seven were issued PMCs for studies to support labeling for companion diagnostic devices.

CONCLUSION

The number of patients and cancer subtypes in trials supporting tissue-agnostic oncology drug approvals varied by mutation. Most drug approvals did not have concurrent approval of a diagnostic test. Post-marketing studies play a critical role in confirming clinical benefit and ensuring companion diagnostic device performance across a broader range of tumor types.

The significance of tissue-agnostic biomarkers in solid tumors: the more the merrier?

INTRODUCTION

To date, several emerging biomarkers have gained considerable interest in the field of predictive molecular oncology. The advent of precision medicine has led to the development of innovative drugs targeting rare molecular pathways independently from histology, defined as tissue-agnostic drugs.

AREAS COVERED

Although there is a lot of promise for this new tissue-agnostic model in the oncological scenario, crucial issues from both the diagnostic and therapeutic standpoint are emerging. This review aims to critically examine the role of tissue-agnostic biomarkers in different solid tumors, focusing on the prevalence and methods of detection of agnostic biomarkers together with drug approvals to guide clinicians in this evolving landscape.

EXPERT OPINION

To strengthen the framework for tissue-agnostic approvals, the dialogue between regulatory, industrial, and academic parties should be intensified. Critical questions include the development of an efficient network system that can overcome the heterogeneity of patients' inclusion criteria along with the increasingly difficult interpretation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) profiling technologies. Cost-effectiveness and risk-benefit studies are needed in the national context considering the modalities of access to diagnostic tests and reimbursement of treatments.

Unveiling the interplay between mutational signatures and tumor microenvironment: a pan-cancer analysis

Background

While recent studies have separately explored mutational signatures and the tumor microenvironment (TME), there is limited research on the associations of both factors in a pan-cancer context.

Materials and methods

We performed a pan-cancer analysis of over 8,000 tumor samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project. Machine learning methods were employed to systematically explore the relationship between mutational signatures and TME and develop a risk score based on TME-associated mutational signatures to predict patient survival outcomes. We also constructed an interaction model to explore how mutational signatures and TME interact and influence cancer prognosis.

Results

Our analysis revealed a varied association between mutational signatures and TME, with the Clock-like signature showing the most widespread influence. Risk scores based on mutational signatures mainly induced by Clock-like and AID/APOBEC activity exhibited strong pan-cancer survival stratification ability. We also propose a novel approach to predict transcriptome decomposed infiltration levels using genome-derived mutational signatures as an alternative approach for exploring TME cell types when transcriptome data are unavailable. Our comprehensive analysis revealed that certain mutational signatures and their interaction with immune cells significantly impact clinical outcomes in particular cancer types. For instance, T cell infiltration levels only served as a prognostic biomarker in melanoma patients with high ultraviolet radiation exposure, breast cancer patients with high homologous recombination deficiency signature, and lung adenocarcinoma patients with high tobacco-associated mutational signature.

Conclusion

Our study comprehensively explains the complex interplay between mutational signatures and immune infiltration in cancer. The results highlight the importance of considering both mutational signatures and immune phenotypes in cancer research and their significant implications for developing personalized cancer treatments and more effective immunotherapy.

Complete remission in a patient with metastatic gastric cancer receiving tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy: a case report

The prognosis for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is poor, with limited treatment options available due to the difficulty of resection. In recent years, chemotherapy and immunotherapy for AGC have shown promising efficacy. However, there is a controversy regarding the surgery of primary tumors and/or metastases in patients with stage IV gastric cancer after systematic therapy. Here, we present a 63-year-old retired female of AGC with supraclavicular metastasis with positive PD-L1 and tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H). After receiving 8 cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) in combination with tislelizumab, the patient achieved complete remission (CR). No evidence of recurrence was identified during follow-up. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of AGC with supraclavicular metastasis who achieved CR after treatment with tislelizumab. The mechanism of CR was discussed by genomic and recent clinical studies. The results indicated that programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥5 may serve as a clinical indication and standard for chemo-immune combination therapy. In combination with other similar reports, patients with microsatellite instability-high/defective mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR), (TMB-H), and positive PD-L1 had better sensitivity to tislelizumab. The patient recovered successfully except for symptoms of gastrointestinal hemorrhage during treatment, which may be associated with the treatment cycle and age. Immunotherapy with tislelizumab has been well-established in the treatment of malignant melanoma, lung cancer, and clear-cell kidney cancer, but its efficacy and safety for esophageal and gastric cancers remain to be validated. The CR of our patient suggested the prospects of tislelizumab in the immunotherapy of gastric cancer. Additionally, a watch-and-wait (WW) method maybe offered for patients with AGC who achieved complete clinical remission (CCR) after immune combination therapy if the patient was older or in poor physical condition.

Microsatellite Instability: A Review of Molecular Epidemiology and Implications for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is one of the most important molecular characteristics of a tumor, which occurs among various tumor types. In this review article, we examine the molecular characteristics of MSI tumors, both sporadic and Lynch-associated. We also overview the risks of developing hereditary forms of cancer and potential mechanisms of tumor development in patients with Lynch syndrome. Additionally, we summarize the results of major clinical studies on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for MSI tumors and discuss the predictive role of MSI in the context of chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors. Finally, we briefly discuss some of the underlying mechanisms causing therapy resistance in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Identification and Biological Validation of a Chemokine/Chemokine Receptor-Based Risk Model for Predicting Immunotherapeutic Response and Prognosis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Over 80% of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients failed to respond to immunotherapy, which can likely be attributed to the tumor microenvironment (TME) remolding mediated by chemokines/chemokine receptors (C/CR). This study aimed to establish a C/CR-based risk model for better immunotherapeutic responses and prognosis. After assessing the characteristic patterns of the C/CR cluster from the TCGA-HNSCC cohort, a six-gene C/CR-based risk model was developed to stratify patients by LASSO Cox analysis. The screened genes were multidimensionally validated by RT-qPCR, scRNA-seq, and protein data. A total of 30.4% of patients in the low-risk group had better responses to anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy. A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in the low-risk group had longer overall survival. A time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve and Cox analyses indicated that risk score served as an independent predictive indicator. The robustness of the immunotherapy response and prognosis prediction was also validated in independent external datasets. Additionally, the TME landscape revealed that the low-risk group was immune activated. Furthermore, the cell communication analysis on the scRNA-seq dataset revealed that cancer-associated fibroblasts were the main communicators within the C/CR ligand-receptor network of TME. Collectively, The C/CR-based risk model simultaneously predicted immunotherapeutic response and prognosis, potentially optimizing personalized therapeutic strategies of HNSCC.